
Supporting information
![]() | Crystallographic Information File (CIF) https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600536801001283/cf6040sup1.cif |
![]() | Structure factor file (CIF format) https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600536801001283/cf6040Isup2.hkl |
CCDC reference: 159711
The title compound was prepared by the reaction of Cu2I2–4,4'-bipyridine [freshly prepared by the reaction of 4,4'-bipyridine and copper(I) iodide] with an excess of diluted hydrochloric acid. After one day standing at room temperature, light orange needles had formed in 60% yield. The homogeneity was checked by X-ray powder diffraction.
All H atoms were located by difference Fourier synthesis and refined with fixed individual displacement parameters [U(H) = 1.2Ueq(C) or U(H) = 1.2Ueq(N)] using a riding model with aromatic C—H = 0.93 Å or N—H = 0.86 Å.
Data collection: DIF4 (Stoe & Cie, 1992); cell refinement: DIF4; data reduction: REDU4 (Stoe & Cie, 1992); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 1990); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997); molecular graphics: XP in SHELXTL-Plus (Siemens, 1991); software used to prepare material for publication: CIFTAB in SHELXL97.
(C10H10N2)[Cu2Cl6] | Z = 1 |
Mr = 497.98 | F(000) = 244 |
Triclinic, P1 | Dx = 2.190 Mg m−3 |
a = 3.9158 (8) Å | Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å |
b = 10.021 (2) Å | Cell parameters from 70 reflections |
c = 10.698 (2) Å | θ = 11–19° |
α = 113.92 (3)° | µ = 3.86 mm−1 |
β = 95.16 (3)° | T = 293 K |
γ = 96.06 (3)° | Needle, light orange |
V = 377.51 (13) Å3 | 0.15 × 0.07 × 0.07 mm |
Phillips PW-1100 four-circle diffractometer | 1716 reflections with I > 2σ(I) |
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube | Rint = 0.018 |
Graphite monochromator | θmax = 30.0°, θmin = 3.7° |
ω/θ scans | h = 0→5 |
Absorption correction: numerical X-SHAPE (Stoe & Cie, 1998) | k = −14→14 |
Tmin = 0.549, Tmax = 0.599 | l = −14→14 |
2500 measured reflections | 4 standard reflections every 120 min |
2205 independent reflections | intensity decay: none |
Refinement on F2 | Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map |
Least-squares matrix: full | Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.028 | H-atom parameters constrained |
wR(F2) = 0.068 | w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.023P)2 + 0.415P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3 |
S = 1.03 | (Δ/σ)max = 0.001 |
2205 reflections | Δρmax = 0.53 e Å−3 |
92 parameters | Δρmin = −0.46 e Å−3 |
0 restraints | Extinction correction: SHELXL97, Fc*=kFc[1+0.001xFc2λ3/sin(2θ)]-1/4 |
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods | Extinction coefficient: 0.0084 (12) |
(C10H10N2)[Cu2Cl6] | γ = 96.06 (3)° |
Mr = 497.98 | V = 377.51 (13) Å3 |
Triclinic, P1 | Z = 1 |
a = 3.9158 (8) Å | Mo Kα radiation |
b = 10.021 (2) Å | µ = 3.86 mm−1 |
c = 10.698 (2) Å | T = 293 K |
α = 113.92 (3)° | 0.15 × 0.07 × 0.07 mm |
β = 95.16 (3)° |
Phillips PW-1100 four-circle diffractometer | 1716 reflections with I > 2σ(I) |
Absorption correction: numerical X-SHAPE (Stoe & Cie, 1998) | Rint = 0.018 |
Tmin = 0.549, Tmax = 0.599 | 4 standard reflections every 120 min |
2500 measured reflections | intensity decay: none |
2205 independent reflections |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.028 | 0 restraints |
wR(F2) = 0.068 | H-atom parameters constrained |
S = 1.03 | Δρmax = 0.53 e Å−3 |
2205 reflections | Δρmin = −0.46 e Å−3 |
92 parameters |
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes. |
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger. |
x | y | z | Uiso*/Ueq | ||
Cu1 | 0.33110 (8) | 0.90348 (3) | 0.08873 (3) | 0.02544 (10) | |
Cl1 | 0.25990 (16) | 0.89121 (6) | −0.13317 (6) | 0.02760 (14) | |
Cl2 | −0.10035 (18) | 0.71109 (7) | 0.02790 (6) | 0.03439 (16) | |
Cl3 | 0.40337 (16) | 0.94513 (7) | 0.31191 (6) | 0.02755 (13) | |
N1 | 0.8566 (6) | 0.6889 (2) | 0.3197 (2) | 0.0296 (5) | |
H1N | 0.9459 | 0.7353 | 0.2752 | 0.036* | |
C1 | 0.5769 (6) | 0.5406 (2) | 0.4613 (2) | 0.0210 (4) | |
C2 | 0.7537 (7) | 0.6839 (3) | 0.5304 (3) | 0.0307 (5) | |
H2 | 0.7767 | 0.7311 | 0.6263 | 0.037* | |
C3 | 0.8957 (7) | 0.7566 (3) | 0.4573 (3) | 0.0317 (6) | |
H3 | 1.0176 | 0.8521 | 0.5037 | 0.038* | |
C4 | 0.6850 (8) | 0.5523 (3) | 0.2483 (3) | 0.0352 (6) | |
H4 | 0.6619 | 0.5090 | 0.1523 | 0.042* | |
C5 | 0.5414 (8) | 0.4751 (3) | 0.3175 (3) | 0.0313 (6) | |
H5 | 0.4213 | 0.3797 | 0.2682 | 0.038* |
U11 | U22 | U33 | U12 | U13 | U23 | |
Cu1 | 0.02994 (17) | 0.02633 (16) | 0.01819 (15) | −0.00603 (11) | 0.00114 (11) | 0.01042 (12) |
Cl1 | 0.0324 (3) | 0.0278 (3) | 0.0196 (3) | −0.0069 (2) | −0.0009 (2) | 0.0107 (2) |
Cl2 | 0.0403 (4) | 0.0325 (3) | 0.0249 (3) | −0.0130 (3) | 0.0015 (2) | 0.0117 (2) |
Cl3 | 0.0310 (3) | 0.0318 (3) | 0.0196 (3) | −0.0013 (2) | 0.0025 (2) | 0.0123 (2) |
N1 | 0.0340 (12) | 0.0306 (11) | 0.0311 (11) | 0.0032 (9) | 0.0093 (9) | 0.0193 (9) |
C1 | 0.0215 (11) | 0.0215 (10) | 0.0206 (10) | 0.0024 (8) | 0.0026 (8) | 0.0097 (9) |
C2 | 0.0408 (15) | 0.0237 (11) | 0.0216 (11) | −0.0059 (10) | 0.0010 (10) | 0.0068 (9) |
C3 | 0.0359 (14) | 0.0249 (11) | 0.0316 (13) | −0.0036 (10) | 0.0040 (11) | 0.0114 (10) |
C4 | 0.0478 (17) | 0.0338 (13) | 0.0219 (12) | −0.0008 (12) | 0.0080 (11) | 0.0107 (10) |
C5 | 0.0429 (15) | 0.0250 (11) | 0.0227 (12) | −0.0026 (11) | 0.0065 (11) | 0.0080 (10) |
Cu1—Cl3 | 2.2361 (8) | C1—C5 | 1.393 (3) |
Cu1—Cl2 | 2.2566 (11) | C1—C1ii | 1.498 (4) |
Cu1—Cl1 | 2.3163 (8) | C2—C3 | 1.381 (3) |
Cu1—Cl1i | 2.3234 (11) | C2—H2 | 0.930 |
Cl1—Cu1i | 2.3234 (11) | C3—H3 | 0.930 |
N1—C4 | 1.332 (3) | C4—C5 | 1.381 (4) |
N1—C3 | 1.334 (3) | C4—H4 | 0.930 |
N1—H1N | 0.860 | C5—H5 | 0.930 |
C1—C2 | 1.388 (3) | ||
Cl3—Cu1—Cl2 | 93.96 (4) | C3—C2—C1 | 120.2 (2) |
Cl3—Cu1—Cl1 | 173.01 (3) | C3—C2—H2 | 119.9 |
Cl2—Cu1—Cl1 | 91.00 (4) | C1—C2—H2 | 119.9 |
Cl3—Cu1—Cl1i | 91.25 (4) | N1—C3—C2 | 119.5 (2) |
Cl2—Cu1—Cl1i | 173.43 (3) | N1—C3—H3 | 120.3 |
Cl1—Cu1—Cl1i | 83.48 (4) | C2—C3—H3 | 120.3 |
Cu1—Cl1—Cu1i | 96.52 (4) | N1—C4—C5 | 119.7 (2) |
C4—N1—C3 | 122.6 (2) | N1—C4—H4 | 120.1 |
C4—N1—H1N | 118.7 | C5—C4—H4 | 120.1 |
C3—N1—H1N | 118.7 | C4—C5—C1 | 119.8 (2) |
C2—C1—C5 | 118.1 (2) | C4—C5—H5 | 120.1 |
C2—C1—C1ii | 121.0 (3) | C1—C5—H5 | 120.1 |
C5—C1—C1ii | 120.9 (3) | ||
Cl2—Cu1—Cl1—Cu1i | 176.44 (3) | C3—N1—C4—C5 | −0.4 (4) |
C5—C1—C2—C3 | −1.5 (4) | N1—C4—C5—C1 | 0.0 (4) |
C1ii—C1—C2—C3 | 179.6 (3) | C2—C1—C5—C4 | 0.9 (4) |
C4—N1—C3—C2 | −0.1 (4) | C1ii—C1—C5—C4 | 179.9 (3) |
C1—C2—C3—N1 | 1.1 (4) |
Symmetry codes: (i) −x+1, −y+2, −z; (ii) −x+1, −y+1, −z+1. |
D—H···A | D—H | H···A | D···A | D—H···A |
N1—H1N···Cl2iii | 0.86 | 2.54 | 3.236 (2) | 138 |
N1—H1N···Cl3iii | 0.86 | 2.49 | 3.198 (2) | 140 |
Symmetry code: (iii) x+1, y, z. |
Experimental details
Crystal data | |
Chemical formula | (C10H10N2)[Cu2Cl6] |
Mr | 497.98 |
Crystal system, space group | Triclinic, P1 |
Temperature (K) | 293 |
a, b, c (Å) | 3.9158 (8), 10.021 (2), 10.698 (2) |
α, β, γ (°) | 113.92 (3), 95.16 (3), 96.06 (3) |
V (Å3) | 377.51 (13) |
Z | 1 |
Radiation type | Mo Kα |
µ (mm−1) | 3.86 |
Crystal size (mm) | 0.15 × 0.07 × 0.07 |
Data collection | |
Diffractometer | Phillips PW-1100 four-circle diffractometer |
Absorption correction | Numerical X-SHAPE (Stoe & Cie, 1998) |
Tmin, Tmax | 0.549, 0.599 |
No. of measured, independent and observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections | 2500, 2205, 1716 |
Rint | 0.018 |
(sin θ/λ)max (Å−1) | 0.703 |
Refinement | |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S | 0.028, 0.068, 1.03 |
No. of reflections | 2205 |
No. of parameters | 92 |
H-atom treatment | H-atom parameters constrained |
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å−3) | 0.53, −0.46 |
Computer programs: DIF4 (Stoe & Cie, 1992), DIF4, REDU4 (Stoe & Cie, 1992), SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 1990), SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997), XP in SHELXTL-Plus (Siemens, 1991), CIFTAB in SHELXL97.
D—H···A | D—H | H···A | D···A | D—H···A |
N1—H1N···Cl2i | 0.86 | 2.54 | 3.236 (2) | 138.1 |
N1—H1N···Cl3i | 0.86 | 2.49 | 3.198 (2) | 140.3 |
Symmetry code: (i) x+1, y, z. |
The structure determination of the title compound, (I), was undertaken within a project on the preparation and structural investigation of new coordination polymers based on copper(I) halides and aromatic bases. Our results are of a significantly higher precision than the previously determined structure (Bukowska-Strzyzewska & Tosik, 1979) and we have been able to locate all H atoms.
The title compound crystallizes in parallel sheets which are composed of rows of alternating bipyridyl cations and Cu2Cl62- anions. These rows run approximately along the [145] vector and are stabilized by bifurcated N—H···Cl hydrogen bonds (Fig. 1). The cation and anion are located on crystallographic centres of inversion and, as a consequence of that, the pyridyl rings are coplanar. Bond lengths and angles are in the usual ranges compared with structures retrieved from the Cambridge Structural Database (Version 5.20 of October 2000; Allen & Kennard, 1993). The bonds between the terminal Cl atoms and the Cu atoms are significantly shorter than the bridging Cu—Cl bonds.