Supporting information
Crystallographic Information File (CIF) https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600536801016920/cf6113sup1.cif | |
Structure factor file (CIF format) https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600536801016920/cf6113Isup2.hkl |
CCDC reference: 176006
γ-Terpinene (97%) was obtained from the Aldrich company and used without further purification. The crystal was grown in a 0.3 mm glass capillary tube at 210 K (a temperature only slightly less than the melting point of the solid in the capillary tube). With the axis of the capillary parallel to the ϕ axis and horizontal on the instrument, the crystal was obtained by moving a plug of solid material up and down the tube (the movement being controlled with the standard height adjustment of the goniometer head). The length of the cylindrical crystal was not estimated, but it exceeded the 0.35 mm collimator diameter. Data were collected at 150 K.
Hydrogen atoms were placed geometrically and refined using a riding model with an isotropic displacement parameter fixed at 1.2 times Ueq for the carbon to which they are attached.
Data collection: COLLECT (Nonius, 1998); cell refinement: HKL SCALEPACK (Otwinowski & Minor, 1997); data reduction: HKL DENZO (Otwinowski & Minor, 1997) and SCALEPACK; program(s) used to solve structure: SIR92 (Altomare et al., 1994); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997); molecular graphics: XP (Sheldrick, 1993) and CAMERON (Watkin et al., 1996); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXL97.
C10H16 | Dx = 1.015 Mg m−3 |
Mr = 136.23 | Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.7107 Å |
Orthorhombic, Pnma | Cell parameters from 4398 reflections |
a = 18.1968 (13) Å | θ = 1.0–27.5° |
b = 7.2601 (5) Å | µ = 0.06 mm−1 |
c = 6.7498 (3) Å | T = 150 K |
V = 891.72 (10) Å3 | Cylinder, colourless |
Z = 4 | 0.15 mm (radius) |
F(000) = 304 |
Nonius KappaCCD diffractometer | 829 reflections with I > 2σ(I) |
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube | Rint = 0.056 |
Thin–slice ω and ϕ scans | θmax = 27.5°, θmin = 3.6° |
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SORTAV; Blessing, 1995) | h = −21→23 |
Tmin = 0.809, Tmax = 0.986 | k = −7→9 |
5877 measured reflections | l = −8→7 |
1102 independent reflections |
Refinement on F2 | Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods |
Least-squares matrix: full | Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.049 | Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites |
wR(F2) = 0.139 | H-atom parameters constrained |
S = 1.06 | w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0688P)2 + 0.1715P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3 |
1102 reflections | (Δ/σ)max = 0.001 |
70 parameters | Δρmax = 0.19 e Å−3 |
0 restraints | Δρmin = −0.23 e Å−3 |
C10H16 | V = 891.72 (10) Å3 |
Mr = 136.23 | Z = 4 |
Orthorhombic, Pnma | Mo Kα radiation |
a = 18.1968 (13) Å | µ = 0.06 mm−1 |
b = 7.2601 (5) Å | T = 150 K |
c = 6.7498 (3) Å | 0.15 mm (radius) |
Nonius KappaCCD diffractometer | 1102 independent reflections |
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SORTAV; Blessing, 1995) | 829 reflections with I > 2σ(I) |
Tmin = 0.809, Tmax = 0.986 | Rint = 0.056 |
5877 measured reflections |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.049 | 0 restraints |
wR(F2) = 0.139 | H-atom parameters constrained |
S = 1.06 | Δρmax = 0.19 e Å−3 |
1102 reflections | Δρmin = −0.23 e Å−3 |
70 parameters |
Experimental. Grown in situ in a 0.30 mm Lindemann tube at 210 K. |
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes. |
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger. |
x | y | z | Uiso*/Ueq | ||
C1 | 1.02376 (10) | 0.2500 | 0.3824 (3) | 0.0310 (4) | |
C2 | 1.02268 (10) | 0.2500 | 0.1860 (3) | 0.0314 (4) | |
H2 | 1.0685 | 0.2500 | 0.1187 | 0.038* | |
C3 | 0.95400 (9) | 0.2500 | 0.0626 (2) | 0.0301 (4) | |
H3 | 0.9554 (7) | 0.139 (2) | −0.0279 (19) | 0.036* | |
C4 | 0.88415 (9) | 0.2500 | 0.1816 (2) | 0.0244 (4) | |
C5 | 0.88555 (10) | 0.2500 | 0.3789 (2) | 0.0285 (4) | |
H5 | 0.8398 | 0.2500 | 0.4467 | 0.034* | |
C6 | 0.95421 (10) | 0.2500 | 0.5016 (3) | 0.0322 (5) | |
H6 | 0.9537 (8) | 0.139 (2) | 0.5946 (19) | 0.039* | |
C7 | 1.09428 (13) | 0.2500 | 0.4999 (4) | 0.0453 (6) | |
H7A | 1.1403 (15) | 0.2500 | 0.411 (4) | 0.068* | |
H7B | 1.0948 (10) | 0.363 (3) | 0.585 (2) | 0.068* | |
C8 | 0.81188 (9) | 0.2500 | 0.0692 (2) | 0.0283 (4) | |
H8 | 0.7716 | 0.2500 | 0.1699 | 0.034* | |
C9 | 0.80236 (7) | 0.4234 (2) | −0.0569 (2) | 0.0406 (4) | |
H9A | 0.7528 | 0.4252 | −0.1137 | 0.061* | |
H9B | 0.8388 | 0.4233 | −0.1639 | 0.061* | |
H9C | 0.8094 | 0.5327 | 0.0261 | 0.061* |
U11 | U22 | U33 | U12 | U13 | U23 | |
C1 | 0.0365 (10) | 0.0192 (9) | 0.0373 (10) | 0.000 | −0.0112 (7) | 0.000 |
C2 | 0.0285 (9) | 0.0297 (10) | 0.0359 (10) | 0.000 | −0.0009 (7) | 0.000 |
C3 | 0.0309 (9) | 0.0366 (10) | 0.0226 (8) | 0.000 | 0.0003 (7) | 0.000 |
C4 | 0.0301 (9) | 0.0211 (8) | 0.0221 (8) | 0.000 | 0.0006 (6) | 0.000 |
C5 | 0.0347 (9) | 0.0277 (9) | 0.0231 (8) | 0.000 | 0.0026 (7) | 0.000 |
C6 | 0.0486 (11) | 0.0262 (10) | 0.0216 (8) | 0.000 | −0.0071 (7) | 0.000 |
C7 | 0.0488 (12) | 0.0324 (11) | 0.0548 (13) | 0.000 | −0.0247 (10) | 0.000 |
C8 | 0.0266 (8) | 0.0326 (10) | 0.0256 (8) | 0.000 | −0.0003 (6) | 0.000 |
C9 | 0.0361 (7) | 0.0469 (9) | 0.0390 (7) | 0.0057 (6) | −0.0043 (5) | 0.0103 (6) |
C1—C2 | 1.326 (2) | C4—C5 | 1.332 (2) |
C1—C6 | 1.499 (3) | C4—C8 | 1.518 (2) |
C1—C7 | 1.508 (2) | C5—C6 | 1.499 (2) |
C2—C3 | 1.502 (2) | C8—C9i | 1.5294 (17) |
C3—C4 | 1.503 (2) | C8—C9 | 1.5294 (17) |
C2—C1—C6 | 121.58 (15) | C3—C4—C8 | 117.74 (13) |
C2—C1—C7 | 122.55 (18) | C4—C5—C6 | 124.64 (16) |
C6—C1—C7 | 115.87 (16) | C5—C6—C1 | 114.04 (14) |
C1—C2—C3 | 124.52 (16) | C4—C8—C9i | 112.10 (9) |
C2—C3—C4 | 114.05 (14) | C4—C8—C9 | 112.10 (9) |
C5—C4—C3 | 121.18 (15) | C9i—C8—C9 | 110.77 (15) |
C5—C4—C8 | 121.08 (15) | ||
C6—C1—C2—C3 | 0.0 | C4—C5—C6—C1 | 0.0 |
C7—C1—C2—C3 | 180.0 | C2—C1—C6—C5 | 0.0 |
C1—C2—C3—C4 | 0.0 | C7—C1—C6—C5 | 180.0 |
C2—C3—C4—C5 | 0.0 | C5—C4—C8—C9i | −117.34 (10) |
C2—C3—C4—C8 | 180.0 | C3—C4—C8—C9i | 62.66 (10) |
C3—C4—C5—C6 | 0.0 | C5—C4—C8—C9 | 117.34 (10) |
C8—C4—C5—C6 | 180.0 | C3—C4—C8—C9 | −62.66 (10) |
Symmetry code: (i) x, −y+1/2, z. |
Experimental details
Crystal data | |
Chemical formula | C10H16 |
Mr | 136.23 |
Crystal system, space group | Orthorhombic, Pnma |
Temperature (K) | 150 |
a, b, c (Å) | 18.1968 (13), 7.2601 (5), 6.7498 (3) |
V (Å3) | 891.72 (10) |
Z | 4 |
Radiation type | Mo Kα |
µ (mm−1) | 0.06 |
Crystal size (mm) | 0.15 (radius) |
Data collection | |
Diffractometer | Nonius KappaCCD diffractometer |
Absorption correction | Multi-scan (SORTAV; Blessing, 1995) |
Tmin, Tmax | 0.809, 0.986 |
No. of measured, independent and observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections | 5877, 1102, 829 |
Rint | 0.056 |
(sin θ/λ)max (Å−1) | 0.649 |
Refinement | |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S | 0.049, 0.139, 1.06 |
No. of reflections | 1102 |
No. of parameters | 70 |
H-atom treatment | H-atom parameters constrained |
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å−3) | 0.19, −0.23 |
Computer programs: COLLECT (Nonius, 1998), HKL SCALEPACK (Otwinowski & Minor, 1997), HKL DENZO (Otwinowski & Minor, 1997) and SCALEPACK, SIR92 (Altomare et al., 1994), SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997), XP (Sheldrick, 1993) and CAMERON (Watkin et al., 1996), SHELXL97.
γ-Terpinene (I) occurs in nature and can be obtained, for example, from coriander oil, lemon oil and cumin oil. An account of its history and the determination of its structure using the techniques of classical organic chemistry is given by Simonsen & Owen (1947). This work forms part of a continuing study devoted to improving the techniques for determining the crystal structures of substances which are liquids at room temperature (see, for example, Davies & Bond, 2001).