addenda and errata
Setting ambiguity in C2/c with dibromidotetrakis(1H-pyrazole-κN2)manganese(II) as an example. Addendum
aInstitut für Anorganische Chemie, J. W. Goethe-Universität Frankfurt, Max-von-Laue-Strasse 7, 60438 Frankfurt/Main, Germany
*Correspondence e-mail: bolte@chemie.uni-frankfurt.de
In the paper by Ruth et al. [Acta Cryst. (2007), C63, m566–m569 ], remarks regarding the results of Bolotina et al. [J. Appl. Cryst. (2003), 36, 1334–1341] are withdrawn.
We wish to withdraw from our paper (Ruth et al., 2007) our remarks concerning the results of Bolotina et al. (2003). Their results do not need to be revised because the same setting has been used for all structure determinations. Although three cells can be transformed to one with a shorter c axis and a smaller angle β, this transformation would change the setting and the six determinations would no longer be comparable.
References
Bolotina, N. B., Hardie, M. J. & Pinkerton, A. A. (2003). J. Appl. Cryst. 36, 1334–1341. Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Ruth, K., Kunz, K., Lerner, H.-W. & Bolte, M. (2007). Acta Cryst. C63, m566–m569. Web of Science CSD CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
© International Union of Crystallography. Prior permission is not required to reproduce short quotations, tables and figures from this article, provided the original authors and source are cited. For more information, click here.