Supporting information
Crystallographic Information File (CIF) https://doi.org/10.1107/S0108270109000092/em3021sup1.cif | |
Structure factor file (CIF format) https://doi.org/10.1107/S0108270109000092/em3021Isup2.hkl |
CCDC reference: 724186
Crystals of (I) were obtained accidentally while storing DMF solvent in a glass bottle with an aluminium-covered cork.
All H atoms were placed in their idealized positions and refined as riding on their carrier atoms, with methyl C—H = 0.96 Å with Uiso(H)= 1.5Ueq(C), formate C—H = 0.96 Å with Uiso(H) = 1.2Ueq(C), and ammonium N—H = 0.90 Å with Uiso(H) = 1.2Ueq(N). Geometric restraints were applied to the N—C bonds and C···C intramolecular contacts within the DMA cation.
Data collection: KM-4 Software (Kuma, 1997); cell refinement: KM-4 Software (Kuma, 1997); data reduction: KM-4 Software (Kuma, 1997) and XEMP (Siemens, 1989); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: Mercury (Macrae et al., 2006); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008).
(C2H8N)2[AlNa(HCO2)6] | Dx = 1.518 Mg m−3 |
Mr = 412.27 | Cu Kα radiation, λ = 1.54178 Å |
Trigonal, R3 | Cell parameters from 1265 reflections |
Hall symbol: -R 3 | θ = 9.9–68.0° |
a = 8.251 (1) Å | µ = 1.83 mm−1 |
c = 22.949 (3) Å | T = 296 K |
V = 1353.0 (3) Å3 | Prismatic, colourless |
Z = 3 | 0.20 × 0.20 × 0.10 mm |
F(000) = 647.9 |
Kuma KM-4 κ-geometry diffractometer | 443 reflections with I > 2σ(I) |
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube | Rint = 0.023 |
Graphite monochromator | θmax = 68.0°, θmin = 9.9° |
ω scans | h = 0→9 |
Absorption correction: multi-scan (XEMP; Siemens,1989) | k = −9→0 |
Tmin = 0.635, Tmax = 0.833 | l = −27→27 |
1164 measured reflections | 2 standard reflections every 50 reflections |
553 independent reflections | intensity decay: none |
Refinement on F2 | Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods |
Least-squares matrix: full | Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.034 | Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites |
wR(F2) = 0.104 | H-atom parameters constrained |
S = 1.07 | w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0658P)2 + 0.8037P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3 |
553 reflections | (Δ/σ)max < 0.001 |
47 parameters | Δρmax = 0.39 e Å−3 |
3 restraints | Δρmin = −0.21 e Å−3 |
(C2H8N)2[AlNa(HCO2)6] | Z = 3 |
Mr = 412.27 | Cu Kα radiation |
Trigonal, R3 | µ = 1.83 mm−1 |
a = 8.251 (1) Å | T = 296 K |
c = 22.949 (3) Å | 0.20 × 0.20 × 0.10 mm |
V = 1353.0 (3) Å3 |
Kuma KM-4 κ-geometry diffractometer | 443 reflections with I > 2σ(I) |
Absorption correction: multi-scan (XEMP; Siemens,1989) | Rint = 0.023 |
Tmin = 0.635, Tmax = 0.833 | 2 standard reflections every 50 reflections |
1164 measured reflections | intensity decay: none |
553 independent reflections |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.034 | 3 restraints |
wR(F2) = 0.104 | H-atom parameters constrained |
S = 1.07 | Δρmax = 0.39 e Å−3 |
553 reflections | Δρmin = −0.21 e Å−3 |
47 parameters |
Experimental. The structure was solved by direct method and refined by a full-matrix least-squares technique based on F2 (SHELXL97). |
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes. |
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger. |
x | y | z | Uiso*/Ueq | Occ. (<1) | |
Al1 | 0.3333 | 0.6667 | 0.1667 | 0.0268 (4) | |
Na1 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0219 (4) | |
O1 | 0.3442 (2) | 0.4831 (2) | 0.11946 (7) | 0.0379 (5) | |
C1 | 0.2160 (3) | 0.3459 (3) | 0.09229 (10) | 0.0414 (6) | |
H1 | 0.0945 | 0.3311 | 0.0990 | 0.050* | |
O2 | 0.2358 (3) | 0.2373 (3) | 0.06147 (9) | 0.0606 (6) | |
N1 | 0.5874 (9) | 0.2473 (9) | 0.0742 (3) | 0.0545 (16) | 0.3333 |
H1N | 0.4687 | 0.2244 | 0.0740 | 0.065* | 0.33333 |
H2N | 0.5814 | 0.1353 | 0.0740 | 0.065* | 0.33333 |
C2 | 0.6667 | 0.3333 | 0.1288 (2) | 0.0673 (14) | |
H2A | 0.7945 | 0.3616 | 0.1295 | 0.101* | 0.33333 |
H2B | 0.5993 | 0.2521 | 0.1607 | 0.101* | 0.33333 |
H2C | 0.6615 | 0.4465 | 0.1328 | 0.101* | 0.33333 |
C3 | 0.6667 | 0.3333 | 0.0219 (2) | 0.106 (3) | |
H3A | 0.7978 | 0.3738 | 0.0214 | 0.158* | 0.33333 |
H3B | 0.6490 | 0.4384 | 0.0153 | 0.158* | 0.33333 |
H3C | 0.6042 | 0.2440 | −0.0087 | 0.158* | 0.33333 |
U11 | U22 | U33 | U12 | U13 | U23 | |
Al1 | 0.0271 (5) | 0.0271 (5) | 0.0261 (7) | 0.0135 (3) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Na1 | 0.0236 (6) | 0.0236 (6) | 0.0184 (8) | 0.0118 (3) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
O1 | 0.0371 (8) | 0.0365 (8) | 0.0391 (9) | 0.0177 (7) | −0.0027 (6) | −0.0077 (6) |
C1 | 0.0408 (12) | 0.0354 (12) | 0.0469 (13) | 0.0181 (10) | −0.0062 (10) | −0.0089 (10) |
O2 | 0.0613 (12) | 0.0561 (12) | 0.0616 (12) | 0.0272 (10) | −0.0118 (10) | −0.0301 (9) |
N1 | 0.050 (4) | 0.041 (3) | 0.074 (4) | 0.024 (3) | −0.010 (3) | −0.004 (3) |
C2 | 0.077 (2) | 0.077 (2) | 0.048 (3) | 0.0385 (11) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
C3 | 0.135 (4) | 0.135 (4) | 0.048 (3) | 0.067 (2) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Al1—O1 | 1.8999 (14) | N1—H2N | 0.9001 |
Na1—O2 | 2.4082 (18) | C2—H2A | 0.9600 |
C1—O1 | 1.262 (3) | C2—H2B | 0.9599 |
C1—O2 | 1.215 (3) | C2—H2C | 0.9600 |
C1—H1 | 0.9600 | C3—H3A | 0.9600 |
N1—C3 | 1.380 (6) | C3—H3B | 0.9600 |
N1—C2 | 1.428 (6) | C3—H3C | 0.9601 |
N1—H1N | 0.9000 | ||
O1—Al1—O1i | 180.0 | C2—N1—H1N | 106.8 |
O1—Al1—O1ii | 90.71 (7) | C3—N1—H2N | 107.0 |
O1—Al1—O1iii | 90.71 (7) | C2—N1—H2N | 107.0 |
O1—Al1—O1iv | 89.29 (7) | H1N—N1—H2N | 106.8 |
O1—Al1—O1v | 89.29 (7) | N1—C2—H2A | 108.0 |
O2—Na1—O2vi | 180 | N1—C2—H2B | 111.2 |
O2—Na1—O2vii | 90.84 (7) | H2A—C2—H2B | 109.9 |
O2—Na1—O2viii | 89.16 (7) | N1—C2—H2C | 109.6 |
O2—Na1—O2ix | 90.84 (7) | H2A—C2—H2C | 109.9 |
O2—Na1—O2x | 89.16 (7) | H2B—C2—H2C | 108.3 |
C1—O1—Al1 | 130.15 (16) | N1—C3—H3A | 110.5 |
O2—C1—O1 | 126.0 (3) | N1—C3—H3B | 110.7 |
O2—C1—H1 | 121.1 | H3A—C3—H3B | 109.8 |
O1—C1—H1 | 112.8 | N1—C3—H3C | 107.8 |
C1—O2—Na1 | 126.08 (18) | H3A—C3—H3C | 109.8 |
C3—N1—C2 | 121.7 (5) | H3B—C3—H3C | 108.2 |
C3—N1—H1N | 106.8 | ||
Al1—O1—C1—O2 | 177.75 (19) | O1—C1—O2—Na1 | −171.65 (18) |
Symmetry codes: (i) −x+2/3, −y+4/3, −z+1/3; (ii) −x+y, −x+1, z; (iii) −y+1, x−y+1, z; (iv) x−y+2/3, x+1/3, −z+1/3; (v) y−1/3, −x+y+1/3, −z+1/3; (vi) −x, −y, −z; (vii) x−y, x, −z; (viii) −x+y, −x, z; (ix) y, −x+y, −z; (x) −y, x−y, z. |
D—H···A | D—H | H···A | D···A | D—H···A |
N1—H1N···O2 | 0.90 | 2.00 | 2.876 (7) | 165 |
N1—H2N···O2xi | 0.90 | 2.30 | 3.059 (7) | 142 |
N1—H2N···O1xi | 0.90 | 2.30 | 3.118 (6) | 151 |
Symmetry code: (xi) −y+1, x−y, z. |
Experimental details
Crystal data | |
Chemical formula | (C2H8N)2[AlNa(HCO2)6] |
Mr | 412.27 |
Crystal system, space group | Trigonal, R3 |
Temperature (K) | 296 |
a, c (Å) | 8.251 (1), 22.949 (3) |
V (Å3) | 1353.0 (3) |
Z | 3 |
Radiation type | Cu Kα |
µ (mm−1) | 1.83 |
Crystal size (mm) | 0.20 × 0.20 × 0.10 |
Data collection | |
Diffractometer | Kuma KM-4 κ-geometry diffractometer |
Absorption correction | Multi-scan (XEMP; Siemens,1989) |
Tmin, Tmax | 0.635, 0.833 |
No. of measured, independent and observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections | 1164, 553, 443 |
Rint | 0.023 |
(sin θ/λ)max (Å−1) | 0.601 |
Refinement | |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S | 0.034, 0.104, 1.07 |
No. of reflections | 553 |
No. of parameters | 47 |
No. of restraints | 3 |
H-atom treatment | H-atom parameters constrained |
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å−3) | 0.39, −0.21 |
Computer programs: , KM-4 Software (Kuma, 1997) and XEMP (Siemens, 1989), SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008), SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008), Mercury (Macrae et al., 2006).
Al1—O1 | 1.8999 (14) | C1—O1 | 1.262 (3) |
Na1—O2 | 2.4082 (18) | C1—O2 | 1.215 (3) |
O1—Al1—O1i | 90.71 (7) | C1—O1—Al1 | 130.15 (16) |
O1—Al1—O1ii | 89.29 (7) | O2—C1—O1 | 126.0 (3) |
O2—Na1—O2iii | 90.84 (7) | C1—O2—Na1 | 126.08 (18) |
O2—Na1—O2iv | 89.16 (7) | C3—N1—C2 | 121.7 (5) |
Al1—O1—C1—O2 | 177.75 (19) | O1—C1—O2—Na1 | −171.65 (18) |
Symmetry codes: (i) −x+y, −x+1, z; (ii) x−y+2/3, x+1/3, −z+1/3; (iii) x−y, x, −z; (iv) −x+y, −x, z. |
D—H···A | D—H | H···A | D···A | D—H···A |
N1—H1N···O2 | 0.90 | 2.00 | 2.876 (7) | 165 |
N1—H2N···O2v | 0.90 | 2.30 | 3.059 (7) | 142 |
N1—H2N···O1v | 0.90 | 2.30 | 3.118 (6) | 151 |
Symmetry code: (v) −y+1, x−y, z. |
The crystal structure of the title compound, (I), contains a decomposition product of DMF and constitutes the first example of a highly symmetrical three-dimensional network built solely of heterometallic M–(µ2-formato-O,O')–M' units. Compound (I) displays R3 symmetry, with NaI and AlIII cations occupying special position sites 3a and 3b, respectively, a formate anion in a general position (18f) and two dimethylammonium (DMA) cations disordered around the threefold axis. The disorder model for each cation comprises both dimethylammonium C atoms lying on a threefold axis (Wyckoff notation 6c) and the NH2 fragment in a general position (18f) statistically distributed around this axis. DMF hydrolysis leading to formic acid and DMA has been reported previously (Sletten & Jensen, 1973; Liu et al., 2003; Wang et al., 2004, 2006; Burrows et al., 2005; Clausen et al., 2005; Chen et al., 2006; Hawxwell & Brammer, 2006). In the resulting crystal structures, formic acid often serves as an anionic ligand in the construction of metal–organic frameworks and DMA acts as a counter-cation to balance the charge.
The structure of (I) contains DMA cations included in voids in the three-dimensional [NaAl(HCOO)6]- network. It is inferred that the source of AlIII cations is the aluminium foil and of NaI cations is the glass container. Reports on the ability of formate solutions to extract NaI cations have appeared in the literature previously (Alcock et al., 2006, and references therein).
Each AlIII and NaI cation is surrounded by six formate anions in an octahedral arrangement (Fig. 1). The trans O—M—O angles are all 180°, while the cis O—M—O angles can be divided into two groups: those related by a threefold axis (smaller than 90° in the case of AlIII and larger than 90° in the case of NaI), and their supplementary angles (Table 1). For these cis O—M—O angles, the maximum deviation in the bond angles from a perfect octahedral geometry amounts to 0.71° around AlIII and 0.84° around NaI. There is one unique Al—O and one Na—O bond length (Table 1). Hence, the coordination polyhedron around each metal ion can be described as a trigonally distorted (MO3O'3) octahedron. Each formate anion connects two metal atoms in the anti–anti coordination mode, which results in infinite AlIII—O—C—O—NaI chains forming a three-dimensional anionic network, similar to the reported homometallic coordination networks with formate as the only bridging ligand (Wang et al., 2004, 2006).
In the structure of (I), one can distinguish corrugated (001) anionic layers containing both metal atoms connected by the formate bridges (Fig. 1). These anionic layers are separated by the cationic [NH2(CH3)2]+ layers. Viewed approximately along the [102] direction, a cubic network formed by heterometallic centres with interpenetrating channels occupied by DMA cations is observed (Fig. 2). The cross-section of the channels, measured between the midpoints of the AlIII and NaI centres, has dimensions of 6.11 × 6.11 Å. A search of the Cambridge Structural Database (Version 5.29, November 2007; Allen, 2002) reveals that such a highly symmetric three-dimensional arrangement of heterometallic centres bridged solely by the formate units, each utilizing its two O atoms to join to only two metals, has not been observed previously. This type of high-symmetry arrangement has so far appeared only in homometallic formates. The heterometallic formates reported in the literature display lower crystal symmetry and contain some of the formate anions linked to more than two metal ions or doubly linked to the same metal centre (Alcock et al., 2006).
The electrostatic interactions between the anionic framework and the cationic solvent molecules are augmented by hydrogen bonding. The H atoms of the DMA cation are involved in the formation of hydrogen bonds with both O atoms of the formate anions. Hydrogen-bond parameters are presented in Table 2.