Download citation
Download citation
link to html
The title compound, C16H6N6·C2H6O, is an ethanol solvate of an aromatic phenanthroline-based flat ligand. The latter exhibits a remarkable π–π stacking in the crystal structure, with inter­planar distances of 3.27 and 3.40 Å, which directs the columnar organization of the ligands. The ethanol solvent mol­ecule is located in channels between these columns, being hydrogen bonded to one of the N-atom sites of the phenanthroline fragment.

Supporting information

cif

Crystallographic Information File (CIF) https://doi.org/10.1107/S0108270107058064/hj3061sup1.cif
Contains datablocks I, global

hkl

Structure factor file (CIF format) https://doi.org/10.1107/S0108270107058064/hj3061Isup2.hkl
Contains datablock I

CCDC reference: 677208

Comment top

6,7-Dicyanodipyridoquinoxaline (DICNQ) has been widely used as a coordination multidentate ligand in the synthesis of various transition metal complexes (Stephensen & Hardie, 2006; Xu et al., 2002; Liu et al., 2001). It has also been employed as an efficient antenna chromophore in the design of photonic and biochemical sensors (Arounaguiri & Maiya, 1999; Ambroize & Maiya, 2000; van der Tol et al., 1998). Redox chemistry of RuI complexes of DICNQ has also been investigated (Kulkarni et al., 2004). During our attempts to synthesize new metal-organic frameworks based on 1,10-phenanthroline and its derivatives with transition metal ions we synthesized DICNQ by a literature procedure (Arounaguiri & Maiya, 1999; van der Tol et al., 1998). Surprisingly, the structure of this important ligand has not been characterized before in its uncomplexed form. Correspondingly, we report here the crystal structure of DICNQ at ca 110 K, which crystallized as an ethanol solvate, (I), with an emphasis on its supramolecular self-organization. The latter is a measure of optimal ligand–ligand interactions in the absence of foreign metal ions, the coordination preference of which dominates the topology of the metal complexes of DICNQ in the previously published structures.

An ORTEPIII (Burnett & Johnson, 1996) representation of (I) is shown in Fig. 1. The molecular framework consists of four fused six-membered rings and is aromatic. This 18-membered delocalized system (excluding the two –CN substituents) is essentially planar, the deviations of the individual atoms from its mean plane not exceeding ±0.07 Å (with an r.m.s. deviation of the fitted atoms of 0.040 Å). The cyano groups are bent to a minor extent with respect to this plane. As commonly observed in crystals of large aromatic molecules, the intermolecular assembly is dominated by ππ stacking of overlapping flat molecular entities. Thus, the crystal structure of (I) can be best described as composed of columns of tightly stacked DICNQ ligands. The stacking direction is along the a axis, though the molecular units are slightly inclined with respect to a (the angle between the normal to the molecular plane and a is about 15°). Along the stacks, the individual species are oriented in alternating directions; the –CN dipoles of adjacent overlapping units related by inversion are aligned in an antiparallel manner. Fig. 2 illustrates the two modes of intermolecular overlap along the stacks. Molecules paired around the inversion center at x = 0, y = 0, z = 1.0 at an interplanar distance of 3.269 (3) Å exhibit a more extensive overlap. Those paired around the x = 1/2, y = 0, z = 1.0 inversion with an interplanar distance of 3.397 (3) Å overlap only through their phenathroline fragments. The almost equidistant intermolecular separation of up to 3.4 Å along these supramolecular arrays indicate that strong ππ stacking interactions assisted by the antiparallel arrangements of the polar species hold together the columnar structure (Fig. 3a).

The packing of the oval stacks in the b and c directions is stabilized mostly by dispersion, including long-range electrostatic (dipolar) interactions between the laterally oriented cyano substituents and van der Waals C—H···NC contacts. The packing leaves channel voids centered at (x, 1/2, 1/2). These channels contain the ethanol solvent molecules, which hydrogen bond to one of the N-atom sites of the phenanthroline fragments (Table 1 and Fig. 3b). The tight packing of DICNQ along one direction and the loose packing in another, associated with the incorporation of the solvent into the crystal structure, illustrates the significance of ππ stacking as a structure directing interaction. Similar stacking patterns have been observed in a large number of crystal structures that contain similar extended aromatic fragments (e.g. Gupta et al., 2004; Gut et al., 2002; Bergman et al., 2002).

Related literature top

For related literature, see: Arounaguiri & Maiya (1999); Bergman et al. (2002); Gupta et al. (2004); Gut et al. (2002); Kulkarni et al. (2004); Liu et al. (2001); Stephensen & Hardie (2006); van der Tol et al. (1998); Xu et al. (2002).

Experimental top

DICNQ was synthesized by previously reported procedures (Arounaguiri & Maiya, 1999; van der Tol et al., 1998) and crystallized from ethanol by slow evaporation.

Refinement top

H atoms bound to C atoms were located in calculated positions and were constrained to ride on their parent atoms, with C—H distances of 0.95, 0.98 and 0.99 Å and with Uiso(H) values of 1.2 and 1.5 times Ueq(C). That bound to the O atom was located in a difference Fourier map; its atomic coordinates were refined freely with a Uiso(H) value of 1.5 Ueq(O).

Computing details top

Data collection: Collect (Nonius, 1999); cell refinement: DENZO (Otwinowski & Minor, 1997); data reduction: DENZO (Otwinowski & Minor, 1997); program(s) used to solve structure: SIR97 (Altomare et al., 1999); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997); molecular graphics: ORTEPIII (Burnett & Johnson, 1996) and Mercury (Macrae et al., 2006); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997).

Figures top
[Figure 1] Fig. 1. The molecular structure of the title compound, showing the atom labeling scheme. The atomic ellipsoids represent displacement parameters at the 50% probability level at ca 110 K.
[Figure 2] Fig. 2. Modes of overlap between neighboring DICNQ molecules within the stacked arrays: (a) molecules related by inversion at (0, 0, 1), spaced at 3.269 (3) Å; (b) molecules related by inversion at (1/2, 0, 1), spaced at 3.397 (3) Å.
[Figure 3] Fig. 3. The crystal packing of (I). (a) An illustration of two adjacent stacks of the DICNQ species (wireframe). The alternating interplanar distances along the stacks are indicated, and the ethanol solvent molecule had been omitted. (b) The intermolecular organization projected down the a axis, showing molecules of the ethanol solvent located in the channels between the stacks (DICNQ is given in wireframe and ethanol in ball-and-stick form). Hydrogen bonds are denoted by dashed lines.
dipyrido[f,h]quinoxaline-6,7-dicarbonitrile ethanol solvate top
Crystal data top
C16H6N6·C2H6OZ = 2
Mr = 328.34F(000) = 340
Triclinic, P1Dx = 1.381 Mg m3
a = 7.1090 (4) ÅMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
b = 10.2326 (5) ÅCell parameters from 2590 reflections
c = 11.1591 (7) Åθ = 2.0–25.7°
α = 93.2852 (19)°µ = 0.09 mm1
β = 102.9380 (18)°T = 110 K
γ = 90.9640 (18)°Plate, brown
V = 789.48 (8) Å30.25 × 0.20 × 0.10 mm
Data collection top
Nonius KappaCCD
diffractometer
1842 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tubeRint = 0.049
Graphite monochromatorθmax = 25.7°, θmin = 2.0°
Detector resolution: 12.8 pixels mm-1h = 88
1 deg. ϕ & ω scansk = 1212
6564 measured reflectionsl = 1313
2958 independent reflections
Refinement top
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.058Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.155H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
S = 1.00 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0815P)2]
where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
2958 reflections(Δ/σ)max = 0.001
230 parametersΔρmax = 0.32 e Å3
0 restraintsΔρmin = 0.25 e Å3
Crystal data top
C16H6N6·C2H6Oγ = 90.9640 (18)°
Mr = 328.34V = 789.48 (8) Å3
Triclinic, P1Z = 2
a = 7.1090 (4) ÅMo Kα radiation
b = 10.2326 (5) ŵ = 0.09 mm1
c = 11.1591 (7) ÅT = 110 K
α = 93.2852 (19)°0.25 × 0.20 × 0.10 mm
β = 102.9380 (18)°
Data collection top
Nonius KappaCCD
diffractometer
1842 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
6564 measured reflectionsRint = 0.049
2958 independent reflections
Refinement top
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.0580 restraints
wR(F2) = 0.155H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
S = 1.00Δρmax = 0.32 e Å3
2958 reflectionsΔρmin = 0.25 e Å3
230 parameters
Special details top

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.

Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/Ueq
N10.3721 (3)0.25824 (17)1.03785 (19)0.0316 (5)
C20.3360 (4)0.3510 (2)0.9460 (3)0.0359 (6)
H20.37500.43720.96460.043*
C30.2449 (4)0.3301 (2)0.8247 (2)0.0344 (6)
H30.22500.39990.76280.041*
C40.1850 (3)0.2072 (2)0.7967 (2)0.0298 (6)
H40.12320.19000.71470.036*
C50.2158 (3)0.1067 (2)0.8907 (2)0.0254 (5)
C60.1481 (3)0.02402 (19)0.8684 (2)0.0234 (5)
C70.1738 (3)0.12118 (19)0.9664 (2)0.0232 (5)
C80.2740 (3)0.0922 (2)1.0894 (2)0.0243 (5)
C90.3035 (3)0.1862 (2)1.1888 (2)0.0282 (6)
H90.25710.27221.17770.034*
C100.4009 (4)0.1512 (2)1.3026 (2)0.0339 (6)
H100.42320.21271.37160.041*
C110.4666 (4)0.0239 (2)1.3152 (2)0.0340 (6)
H110.53590.00201.39420.041*
N120.4385 (3)0.06891 (17)1.22374 (18)0.0301 (5)
C130.3107 (3)0.1369 (2)1.0102 (2)0.0252 (5)
C140.3431 (3)0.0348 (2)1.1112 (2)0.0251 (5)
N150.0568 (3)0.04955 (17)0.75295 (17)0.0266 (5)
N160.1019 (3)0.24223 (16)0.94864 (18)0.0262 (5)
C170.0108 (3)0.1685 (2)0.7370 (2)0.0261 (5)
C180.0100 (3)0.2647 (2)0.8349 (2)0.0253 (5)
C190.1092 (4)0.1961 (2)0.6136 (2)0.0315 (6)
C200.0752 (4)0.3912 (2)0.8144 (2)0.0320 (6)
N210.1868 (3)0.2187 (2)0.5159 (2)0.0436 (6)
N220.1468 (3)0.48930 (19)0.7943 (2)0.0414 (6)
C230.7334 (5)0.4303 (3)1.4540 (3)0.0500 (8)
H23A0.86900.42801.44840.075*
H23B0.67640.51781.42650.075*
H23C0.72540.41001.53960.075*
C240.6255 (4)0.3314 (3)1.3739 (3)0.0461 (7)
H24A0.48700.33701.37560.055*
H24B0.67590.24231.40550.055*
O250.6470 (3)0.35486 (16)1.25190 (17)0.0373 (5)
H250.562 (5)0.304 (3)1.203 (3)0.056*
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top
U11U22U33U12U13U23
N10.0297 (12)0.0272 (10)0.0386 (13)0.0065 (8)0.0074 (10)0.0079 (9)
C20.0356 (15)0.0254 (12)0.0484 (18)0.0070 (10)0.0115 (13)0.0072 (11)
C30.0340 (15)0.0319 (13)0.0386 (16)0.0040 (10)0.0117 (12)0.0017 (11)
C40.0281 (14)0.0306 (12)0.0321 (14)0.0044 (9)0.0086 (11)0.0043 (10)
C50.0206 (12)0.0264 (12)0.0313 (14)0.0028 (9)0.0099 (10)0.0028 (10)
C60.0198 (12)0.0268 (12)0.0243 (13)0.0005 (9)0.0053 (10)0.0060 (9)
C70.0195 (12)0.0262 (11)0.0255 (13)0.0011 (8)0.0083 (10)0.0035 (9)
C80.0211 (13)0.0277 (11)0.0255 (13)0.0032 (9)0.0073 (10)0.0052 (9)
C90.0255 (13)0.0285 (12)0.0310 (14)0.0026 (9)0.0060 (11)0.0051 (10)
C100.0316 (14)0.0414 (14)0.0275 (14)0.0017 (10)0.0042 (11)0.0016 (11)
C110.0327 (15)0.0440 (14)0.0240 (14)0.0032 (11)0.0016 (11)0.0088 (11)
N120.0303 (12)0.0329 (10)0.0279 (12)0.0040 (8)0.0063 (9)0.0099 (9)
C130.0203 (13)0.0277 (11)0.0286 (14)0.0029 (9)0.0060 (10)0.0084 (10)
C140.0189 (12)0.0327 (12)0.0253 (14)0.0003 (9)0.0069 (10)0.0084 (10)
N150.0235 (11)0.0315 (10)0.0250 (11)0.0006 (8)0.0054 (9)0.0047 (8)
N160.0256 (11)0.0255 (10)0.0279 (12)0.0030 (8)0.0060 (9)0.0068 (8)
C170.0232 (13)0.0280 (12)0.0275 (14)0.0032 (9)0.0045 (11)0.0089 (10)
C180.0225 (13)0.0259 (11)0.0279 (14)0.0012 (9)0.0049 (11)0.0075 (10)
C190.0310 (14)0.0313 (13)0.0309 (15)0.0033 (10)0.0027 (12)0.0071 (10)
C200.0326 (14)0.0310 (13)0.0302 (14)0.0006 (10)0.0015 (11)0.0052 (10)
N210.0497 (15)0.0469 (13)0.0321 (14)0.0082 (10)0.0029 (12)0.0084 (10)
N220.0466 (15)0.0334 (12)0.0425 (14)0.0085 (10)0.0042 (11)0.0105 (9)
C230.063 (2)0.0504 (16)0.0401 (18)0.0223 (14)0.0141 (15)0.0143 (13)
C240.0472 (18)0.0557 (16)0.0369 (17)0.0188 (13)0.0105 (14)0.0082 (13)
O250.0406 (11)0.0395 (10)0.0344 (11)0.0142 (8)0.0109 (9)0.0105 (7)
Geometric parameters (Å, º) top
N1—C21.334 (3)C11—N121.332 (3)
N1—C131.352 (3)C11—H110.9500
C2—C31.394 (4)N12—C141.355 (3)
C2—H20.9500C13—C141.469 (3)
C3—C41.365 (3)N15—C171.323 (3)
C3—H30.9500N16—C181.326 (3)
C4—C51.404 (3)C17—C181.409 (3)
C4—H40.9500C17—C191.444 (3)
C5—C131.407 (3)C18—C201.447 (3)
C5—C61.445 (3)C19—N211.145 (3)
C6—N151.348 (3)C20—N221.144 (3)
C6—C71.413 (3)C23—C241.494 (3)
C7—N161.356 (3)C23—H23A0.9800
C7—C81.448 (3)C23—H23B0.9800
C8—C91.402 (3)C23—H23C0.9800
C8—C141.412 (3)C24—O251.411 (3)
C9—C101.373 (3)C24—H24A0.9900
C9—H90.9500C24—H24B0.9900
C10—C111.395 (3)O25—H250.91 (3)
C10—H100.9500
C2—N1—C13116.8 (2)C11—N12—C14116.88 (19)
N1—C2—C3124.5 (2)N1—C13—C5122.8 (2)
N1—C2—H2117.7N1—C13—C14117.5 (2)
C3—C2—H2117.7C5—C13—C14119.77 (19)
C4—C3—C2118.5 (2)N12—C14—C8122.7 (2)
C4—C3—H3120.7N12—C14—C13117.15 (19)
C2—C3—H3120.7C8—C14—C13120.1 (2)
C3—C4—C5119.2 (2)C17—N15—C6116.76 (19)
C3—C4—H4120.4C18—N16—C7116.57 (19)
C5—C4—H4120.4N15—C17—C18122.2 (2)
C4—C5—C13118.2 (2)N15—C17—C19116.9 (2)
C4—C5—C6121.9 (2)C18—C17—C19120.84 (19)
C13—C5—C6119.9 (2)N16—C18—C17121.93 (19)
N15—C6—C7121.25 (19)N16—C18—C20117.7 (2)
N15—C6—C5118.4 (2)C17—C18—C20120.3 (2)
C7—C6—C5120.3 (2)N21—C19—C17179.6 (3)
N16—C7—C6121.2 (2)N22—C20—C18177.5 (3)
N16—C7—C8118.3 (2)C24—C23—H23A109.5
C6—C7—C8120.40 (19)C24—C23—H23B109.5
C9—C8—C14118.5 (2)H23A—C23—H23B109.5
C9—C8—C7122.10 (19)C24—C23—H23C109.5
C14—C8—C7119.4 (2)H23A—C23—H23C109.5
C10—C9—C8118.6 (2)H23B—C23—H23C109.5
C10—C9—H9120.7O25—C24—C23109.8 (2)
C8—C9—H9120.7O25—C24—H24A109.7
C9—C10—C11119.0 (2)C23—C24—H24A109.7
C9—C10—H10120.5O25—C24—H24B109.7
C11—C10—H10120.5C23—C24—H24B109.7
N12—C11—C10124.3 (2)H24A—C24—H24B108.2
N12—C11—H11117.8C24—O25—H25107.9 (19)
C10—C11—H11117.8
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
O25—H25···N10.91 (3)2.11 (3)2.958 (3)155 (3)

Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formulaC16H6N6·C2H6O
Mr328.34
Crystal system, space groupTriclinic, P1
Temperature (K)110
a, b, c (Å)7.1090 (4), 10.2326 (5), 11.1591 (7)
α, β, γ (°)93.2852 (19), 102.9380 (18), 90.9640 (18)
V3)789.48 (8)
Z2
Radiation typeMo Kα
µ (mm1)0.09
Crystal size (mm)0.25 × 0.20 × 0.10
Data collection
DiffractometerNonius KappaCCD
diffractometer
Absorption correction
No. of measured, independent and
observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections
6564, 2958, 1842
Rint0.049
(sin θ/λ)max1)0.610
Refinement
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S 0.058, 0.155, 1.00
No. of reflections2958
No. of parameters230
H-atom treatmentH atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å3)0.32, 0.25

Computer programs: Collect (Nonius, 1999), DENZO (Otwinowski & Minor, 1997), SIR97 (Altomare et al., 1999), SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997), ORTEPIII (Burnett & Johnson, 1996) and Mercury (Macrae et al., 2006).

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
O25—H25···N10.91 (3)2.11 (3)2.958 (3)155 (3)
 

Follow Acta Cryst. C
Sign up for e-alerts
Follow Acta Cryst. on Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds