


Supporting information
![]() | Crystallographic Information File (CIF) https://doi.org/10.1107/S160053680703156X/is2183sup1.cif |
![]() | Structure factor file (CIF format) https://doi.org/10.1107/S160053680703156X/is2183Isup2.hkl |
CCDC reference: 657878
The title compound was isolated during the slow diffusion of dioxane into a methanol solution of the lanthanum(III) chloride Schiff base complex – product of the template condensation reaction of one molecule of putrescine with two molecules of salicylaldehyde.
Putrescine is involved in proliferation and differentiation of cells in DNA replication and membrane stabilization, in addition to being present in high intercellular concentration in carcinogenetic states of cells. The negative charge of the DNA backbone makes it target for cationic species, so positively charged putrescine and the other biogenic polyamines may interact directly with DNA (Karigiannis & Papaioannou, 2000). During our study on design and synthesis of self-assembled supramolecular architectures incorporating biogenic polyamine fragments with flexibility and strong affinity to nucleic acids, therefore displaying interesting properties and potential applications (Radecka-Paryzek et al., 2007), we isolated the crystals of putrescine dichloride.
The crystal structure of putrescinium chloride was investigated by Ashida & Hirokawa (1963) using visually estimated intensities, and then by Chandrasekhar & Pattabhi (1980). This last determination was performed at room temperature, and H atom positions and thermal parameters were not refined. R factor of this determination was also quite high, 6.4%. The hydrogen bond system is extensive in this crystal structure, so the positions of H atoms are important. We have repeated this structure determination at 100 (1) K and with the new data we were able to refine all parameters of H atoms. The overall features of the crystal structure are similar to those of Ashida & Hirokawa (1963). The elongation of the bond lengths at 100 K is probably connected with the minimalization of libration effect. The N—H···Cl and C—H···Cl hydrogen bonds connect cations and anions into layers (Fig. 2). These layers in turn by means of electrostatic interactions and weaker C—H···Cl hydrogen bonds make a three-dimensional structure with alternate cation and anion layers (Fig. 3).
For related literature, see: Ashida & Hirokawa (1963); Karigiannis & Papaioannou (2000); Radecka-Paryzek et al. (2007).
Data collection: CrysAlis CCD (Oxford Diffraction, 2002); cell refinement: CrysAlis CCD; data reduction: CrysAlis RED (Oxford Diffraction, 2002); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 1997); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997); molecular graphics: Stereochemical Workstation Operation Manual (Siemens, 1989); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXL97.
C4H14N22+·2Cl− | F(000) = 172 |
Mr = 161.07 | Dx = 1.314 Mg m−3 |
Monoclinic, P21/c | Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å |
Hall symbol: -P 2ybc | Cell parameters from 1321 reflections |
a = 4.5625 (9) Å | θ = 3–25° |
b = 8.3514 (16) Å | µ = 0.71 mm−1 |
c = 10.696 (2) Å | T = 100 K |
β = 92.472 (16)° | Prism, colourless |
V = 407.16 (14) Å3 | 0.3 × 0.15 × 0.1 mm |
Z = 2 |
Kuma KM4 CCD four-circle diffractometer | 716 reflections with I > 2σ(I) |
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube | Rint = 0.045 |
Graphite monochromator | θmax = 28.0°, θmin = 3.1° |
ω scans | h = −6→5 |
2576 measured reflections | k = −9→11 |
970 independent reflections | l = −14→12 |
Refinement on F2 | Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods |
Least-squares matrix: full | Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.037 | Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites |
wR(F2) = 0.085 | All H-atom parameters refined |
S = 1.06 | w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.041P)2] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3 |
970 reflections | (Δ/σ)max < 0.001 |
65 parameters | Δρmax = 0.52 e Å−3 |
0 restraints | Δρmin = −0.43 e Å−3 |
C4H14N22+·2Cl− | V = 407.16 (14) Å3 |
Mr = 161.07 | Z = 2 |
Monoclinic, P21/c | Mo Kα radiation |
a = 4.5625 (9) Å | µ = 0.71 mm−1 |
b = 8.3514 (16) Å | T = 100 K |
c = 10.696 (2) Å | 0.3 × 0.15 × 0.1 mm |
β = 92.472 (16)° |
Kuma KM4 CCD four-circle diffractometer | 716 reflections with I > 2σ(I) |
2576 measured reflections | Rint = 0.045 |
970 independent reflections |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.037 | 0 restraints |
wR(F2) = 0.085 | All H-atom parameters refined |
S = 1.06 | Δρmax = 0.52 e Å−3 |
970 reflections | Δρmin = −0.43 e Å−3 |
65 parameters |
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes. |
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger. |
x | y | z | Uiso*/Ueq | ||
N1 | 0.6183 (4) | 0.1691 (3) | 0.37234 (18) | 0.0161 (4) | |
H1A | 0.516 (5) | 0.089 (3) | 0.345 (2) | 0.013 (6)* | |
H1B | 0.714 (6) | 0.209 (3) | 0.307 (2) | 0.033 (7)* | |
H1C | 0.751 (6) | 0.141 (3) | 0.426 (3) | 0.029 (7)* | |
C2 | 0.4232 (5) | 0.2942 (3) | 0.4245 (2) | 0.0149 (5) | |
H2A | 0.275 (5) | 0.325 (3) | 0.356 (2) | 0.013 (5)* | |
H2B | 0.319 (5) | 0.247 (3) | 0.492 (2) | 0.019 (6)* | |
C3 | 0.6007 (5) | 0.4371 (3) | 0.4727 (2) | 0.0156 (5) | |
H3A | 0.713 (5) | 0.483 (3) | 0.399 (2) | 0.019 (6)* | |
H3B | 0.754 (5) | 0.397 (3) | 0.538 (2) | 0.020 (6)* | |
Cl1 | 0.87455 (11) | 0.10103 (6) | 0.65756 (5) | 0.01548 (18) |
U11 | U22 | U33 | U12 | U13 | U23 | |
N1 | 0.0167 (10) | 0.0156 (10) | 0.0160 (9) | −0.0009 (8) | 0.0007 (8) | −0.0012 (8) |
C2 | 0.0149 (11) | 0.0153 (11) | 0.0147 (10) | 0.0021 (9) | 0.0014 (8) | −0.0008 (9) |
C3 | 0.0142 (11) | 0.0184 (13) | 0.0141 (11) | −0.0006 (9) | 0.0011 (8) | −0.0007 (9) |
Cl1 | 0.0164 (3) | 0.0166 (3) | 0.0135 (3) | 0.0006 (2) | 0.00115 (17) | −0.0010 (2) |
N1—C2 | 1.496 (3) | C2—H2A | 1.01 (2) |
N1—H1A | 0.86 (2) | C2—H2B | 0.97 (2) |
N1—H1B | 0.90 (3) | C3—C3i | 1.528 (4) |
N1—H1C | 0.85 (3) | C3—H3A | 1.03 (2) |
C2—C3 | 1.520 (3) | C3—H3B | 1.02 (2) |
C2—N1—H1A | 110.6 (16) | N1—C2—H2B | 108.2 (15) |
C2—N1—H1B | 110.3 (17) | C3—C2—H2B | 109.9 (14) |
H1A—N1—H1B | 107 (2) | H2A—C2—H2B | 108.1 (18) |
C2—N1—H1C | 110.8 (19) | C2—C3—C3i | 110.4 (2) |
H1A—N1—H1C | 112 (2) | C2—C3—H3A | 108.0 (13) |
H1B—N1—H1C | 106 (2) | C3i—C3—H3A | 111.3 (14) |
N1—C2—C3 | 110.96 (17) | C2—C3—H3B | 108.4 (14) |
N1—C2—H2A | 107.4 (13) | C3i—C3—H3B | 111.7 (14) |
C3—C2—H2A | 112.2 (13) | H3A—C3—H3B | 107.0 (18) |
N1—C2—C3—C3i | −179.2 (2) |
Symmetry code: (i) −x+1, −y+1, −z+1. |
D—H···A | D—H | H···A | D···A | D—H···A |
N1—H1C···Cl1 | 0.85 (3) | 2.53 (3) | 3.269 (2) | 145 (2) |
C3—H3B···Cl1 | 1.02 (2) | 2.83 (2) | 3.624 (2) | 135.0 (17) |
N1—H1A···Cl1ii | 0.86 (2) | 2.38 (3) | 3.192 (2) | 156 (2) |
N1—H1B···Cl1iii | 0.90 (3) | 2.39 (3) | 3.250 (2) | 159 (2) |
C3—H3A···Cl1iii | 1.03 (2) | 2.80 (2) | 3.659 (2) | 140.2 (17) |
N1—H1C···Cl1iv | 0.85 (3) | 2.82 (3) | 3.258 (2) | 114 (2) |
C2—H2A···Cl1v | 1.01 (2) | 2.81 (2) | 3.816 (2) | 177.0 (17) |
C2—H2B···Cl1vi | 0.97 (2) | 3.00 (2) | 3.952 (2) | 166.3 (17) |
Symmetry codes: (ii) −x+1, −y, −z+1; (iii) x, −y+1/2, z−1/2; (iv) −x+2, −y, −z+1; (v) x−1, −y+1/2, z−1/2; (vi) x−1, y, z. |
Experimental details
Crystal data | |
Chemical formula | C4H14N22+·2Cl− |
Mr | 161.07 |
Crystal system, space group | Monoclinic, P21/c |
Temperature (K) | 100 |
a, b, c (Å) | 4.5625 (9), 8.3514 (16), 10.696 (2) |
β (°) | 92.472 (16) |
V (Å3) | 407.16 (14) |
Z | 2 |
Radiation type | Mo Kα |
µ (mm−1) | 0.71 |
Crystal size (mm) | 0.3 × 0.15 × 0.1 |
Data collection | |
Diffractometer | Kuma KM4 CCD four-circle |
Absorption correction | – |
No. of measured, independent and observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections | 2576, 970, 716 |
Rint | 0.045 |
(sin θ/λ)max (Å−1) | 0.661 |
Refinement | |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S | 0.037, 0.085, 1.06 |
No. of reflections | 970 |
No. of parameters | 65 |
H-atom treatment | All H-atom parameters refined |
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å−3) | 0.52, −0.43 |
Computer programs: CrysAlis CCD (Oxford Diffraction, 2002), CrysAlis CCD, CrysAlis RED (Oxford Diffraction, 2002), SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 1997), SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997), Stereochemical Workstation Operation Manual (Siemens, 1989), SHELXL97.
D—H···A | D—H | H···A | D···A | D—H···A |
N1—H1C···Cl1 | 0.85 (3) | 2.53 (3) | 3.269 (2) | 145 (2) |
C3—H3B···Cl1 | 1.02 (2) | 2.83 (2) | 3.624 (2) | 135.0 (17) |
N1—H1A···Cl1i | 0.86 (2) | 2.38 (3) | 3.192 (2) | 156 (2) |
N1—H1B···Cl1ii | 0.90 (3) | 2.39 (3) | 3.250 (2) | 159 (2) |
C3—H3A···Cl1ii | 1.03 (2) | 2.80 (2) | 3.659 (2) | 140.2 (17) |
N1—H1C···Cl1iii | 0.85 (3) | 2.82 (3) | 3.258 (2) | 114 (2) |
C2—H2A···Cl1iv | 1.01 (2) | 2.81 (2) | 3.816 (2) | 177.0 (17) |
C2—H2B···Cl1v | 0.97 (2) | 3.00 (2) | 3.952 (2) | 166.3 (17) |
Symmetry codes: (i) −x+1, −y, −z+1; (ii) x, −y+1/2, z−1/2; (iii) −x+2, −y, −z+1; (iv) x−1, −y+1/2, z−1/2; (v) x−1, y, z. |
Putrescine is involved in proliferation and differentiation of cells in DNA replication and membrane stabilization, in addition to being present in high intercellular concentration in carcinogenetic states of cells. The negative charge of the DNA backbone makes it target for cationic species, so positively charged putrescine and the other biogenic polyamines may interact directly with DNA (Karigiannis & Papaioannou, 2000). During our study on design and synthesis of self-assembled supramolecular architectures incorporating biogenic polyamine fragments with flexibility and strong affinity to nucleic acids, therefore displaying interesting properties and potential applications (Radecka-Paryzek et al., 2007), we isolated the crystals of putrescine dichloride.
The crystal structure of putrescinium chloride was investigated by Ashida & Hirokawa (1963) using visually estimated intensities, and then by Chandrasekhar & Pattabhi (1980). This last determination was performed at room temperature, and H atom positions and thermal parameters were not refined. R factor of this determination was also quite high, 6.4%. The hydrogen bond system is extensive in this crystal structure, so the positions of H atoms are important. We have repeated this structure determination at 100 (1) K and with the new data we were able to refine all parameters of H atoms. The overall features of the crystal structure are similar to those of Ashida & Hirokawa (1963). The elongation of the bond lengths at 100 K is probably connected with the minimalization of libration effect. The N—H···Cl and C—H···Cl hydrogen bonds connect cations and anions into layers (Fig. 2). These layers in turn by means of electrostatic interactions and weaker C—H···Cl hydrogen bonds make a three-dimensional structure with alternate cation and anion layers (Fig. 3).