Download citation
Download citation
link to html
In the structure of the title compound (23DMPMSA), C9H13NO2S, the conformation of the N—H bond lies between syn and anti to the methyl substituents at the ortho and meta positions, in contrast to the syn and anti conformations observed, respectively, for N-(2-methyl­phenyl)­methane­sulfonamide (2MPMSA) and N-(3-methyl­phenyl)­methane­sulfonamide (3MPMSA). The bond parameters in N-phenyl­methane­sulfonamide (PMSA), 2MPMSA, 3MPMSA and 23DMPMSA are similar except for some differences in the torsion angles. The H atom on N is on one side of the plane of the benzene ring, while the methane­sulfonyl group is on the opposite side of the plane, as in PMSA, 2MPMSA and 3MPMSA. The amide H atom is thus available to a receptor mol­ecule during its biological activity. The mol­ecules in the title compound are packed into chains through N—H...O hydrogen bonding.

Supporting information

cif

Crystallographic Information File (CIF) https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600536807025202/lw2017sup1.cif
Contains datablocks I, global

hkl

Structure factor file (CIF format) https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600536807025202/lw2017Isup2.hkl
Contains datablock I

CCDC reference: 614672

Key indicators

  • Single-crystal X-ray study
  • T = 301 K
  • Mean [sigma](C-C) = 0.005 Å
  • R factor = 0.054
  • wR factor = 0.130
  • Data-to-parameter ratio = 16.6

checkCIF/PLATON results

No syntax errors found



Alert level C PLAT340_ALERT_3_C Low Bond Precision on C-C Bonds (x 1000) Ang ... 6
Alert level G REFLT03_ALERT_4_G Please check that the estimate of the number of Friedel pairs is correct. If it is not, please give the correct count in the _publ_section_exptl_refinement section of the submitted CIF. From the CIF: _diffrn_reflns_theta_max 26.36 From the CIF: _reflns_number_total 2023 Count of symmetry unique reflns 1242 Completeness (_total/calc) 162.88% TEST3: Check Friedels for noncentro structure Estimate of Friedel pairs measured 781 Fraction of Friedel pairs measured 0.629 Are heavy atom types Z>Si present yes PLAT860_ALERT_3_G Note: Number of Least-Squares Restraints ....... 1
0 ALERT level A = In general: serious problem 0 ALERT level B = Potentially serious problem 1 ALERT level C = Check and explain 2 ALERT level G = General alerts; check 0 ALERT type 1 CIF construction/syntax error, inconsistent or missing data 0 ALERT type 2 Indicator that the structure model may be wrong or deficient 2 ALERT type 3 Indicator that the structure quality may be low 1 ALERT type 4 Improvement, methodology, query or suggestion 0 ALERT type 5 Informative message, check

Comment top

The biological activity of alkyl sulfonanilides is thought to be due to the hydrogen of the phenyl N—H portion of the sulfonanilide molecules as it can align itself, in relation to a receptor site. Therefore the structural studies of sulfonanilides are of interest. In the present work, the structure of N-(2,3-dimethylphenyl)-methanesulfonamide (23DMPMSA) has been determined to explore the substituent effects on the solid state structures of sulfonanilides (Gowda et al., 2007a-g). The structure of 23DMPMSA (Fig. 1) resembles those of N-(phenyl)-methanesulfonamide (PMSA) (Klug, 1968), N-(2-methylphenyl)-methanesulfonamide (2MPMSA) (Gowda et al., 2007d), N-(3-methylphenyl)- methanesulfonamide (3MPMSA)(Gowda et al., 2007b) and other alkyl sulfonanilides (Gowda et al., 2007a,c,e-g). The conformation of the N—H bond lies between syn and anti conformations to the methyl substituents at ortho and meta positions, in contrast to the syn and anti conformations observed, respectively, for the 2MPMSA and 3MPMSA. Dimethyl substitutions at both ortho and meta positions in PMSA changes its space group from monoclinic P21/c to orthorhombic P212121, compared to the change over from monoclinic P21/c to triclinic P-1 on ortho methyl substitution in PMSA and from monoclinic P21/c to orthorhombic Pccn on meta substitution in PMSA. The geometric parameters in PMSA, 2MPMSA, 3MPMSA and 23DMPMSA are similar except for some difference in the torsional angles, C1S2N5C6, S2N5C6C7, S2N5C6C11, O3S2N5C6, O4S2N5C6: 62.2 (2)°, 75.5 (2)°, -106.6 (2)°, -54.4 (2)°, 177.7 (2)° (PMSA); -64.5 (2)°, 117.1 (2)°, -65.3 (3)°, 51.3 (2)°, 179.1 (2)° (2MPMSA); 57.9 (3)°, 68.1 (4)°, -114.3 (3)°, -57.7 (3)°, 174.7 (3)° (3MPMSA); 71.4 (3)°, 70.1 (4)°, -110.8 (3)°, -44.9 (3)°, -172.6 (3)° (23DMPMSA), respectively. The data included for PMSA are the values determined under the present conditions as the literature values were determined in Klug, 1968. The N—H hydrogen sits alone on one side of the plane of the phenyl group, while the whole methanesulfonyl group is on the opposite side of the plane, similar to that in PMSA, 2MPMSA and 3MPMSA. The amide hydrogen is thus available to a receptor molecule during its biological activity. The molecules in 23DMPMSA are packed into chains in the direction of b axis (Fig. 2) through N—H···O hydrogen bonds (Fig. 3 and Table 1).

Related literature top

For related literature, see: Gowda et al. (2007a,b,c,d,e,f,g); Jayalakshmi & Gowda (2004); Klug (1968).

Experimental top

The title compound was prepared according to the literature method (Jayalakshmi & Gowda, 2004). The purity of the compound was checked by determining its melting point. It was characterized by recording its infrared and NMR spectra (Jayalakshmi & Gowda, 2004). Single crystals of the title compound were obtained from a slow evaporation of its ethanolic solution and used for X-ray diffraction studied at room temperature.

Refinement top

The H atom of the NH group was located in a diffrerence map and its position refined. The carbon-bound H atoms were positioned with idealized geometry and refined using a riding model with C—H = 0.93 Å (CH aromatic) or 0.96 Å (CH3). Isotropic displacement parameters for all H atoms were set equal to 1.2 Ueq (parent atom).

Structure description top

The biological activity of alkyl sulfonanilides is thought to be due to the hydrogen of the phenyl N—H portion of the sulfonanilide molecules as it can align itself, in relation to a receptor site. Therefore the structural studies of sulfonanilides are of interest. In the present work, the structure of N-(2,3-dimethylphenyl)-methanesulfonamide (23DMPMSA) has been determined to explore the substituent effects on the solid state structures of sulfonanilides (Gowda et al., 2007a-g). The structure of 23DMPMSA (Fig. 1) resembles those of N-(phenyl)-methanesulfonamide (PMSA) (Klug, 1968), N-(2-methylphenyl)-methanesulfonamide (2MPMSA) (Gowda et al., 2007d), N-(3-methylphenyl)- methanesulfonamide (3MPMSA)(Gowda et al., 2007b) and other alkyl sulfonanilides (Gowda et al., 2007a,c,e-g). The conformation of the N—H bond lies between syn and anti conformations to the methyl substituents at ortho and meta positions, in contrast to the syn and anti conformations observed, respectively, for the 2MPMSA and 3MPMSA. Dimethyl substitutions at both ortho and meta positions in PMSA changes its space group from monoclinic P21/c to orthorhombic P212121, compared to the change over from monoclinic P21/c to triclinic P-1 on ortho methyl substitution in PMSA and from monoclinic P21/c to orthorhombic Pccn on meta substitution in PMSA. The geometric parameters in PMSA, 2MPMSA, 3MPMSA and 23DMPMSA are similar except for some difference in the torsional angles, C1S2N5C6, S2N5C6C7, S2N5C6C11, O3S2N5C6, O4S2N5C6: 62.2 (2)°, 75.5 (2)°, -106.6 (2)°, -54.4 (2)°, 177.7 (2)° (PMSA); -64.5 (2)°, 117.1 (2)°, -65.3 (3)°, 51.3 (2)°, 179.1 (2)° (2MPMSA); 57.9 (3)°, 68.1 (4)°, -114.3 (3)°, -57.7 (3)°, 174.7 (3)° (3MPMSA); 71.4 (3)°, 70.1 (4)°, -110.8 (3)°, -44.9 (3)°, -172.6 (3)° (23DMPMSA), respectively. The data included for PMSA are the values determined under the present conditions as the literature values were determined in Klug, 1968. The N—H hydrogen sits alone on one side of the plane of the phenyl group, while the whole methanesulfonyl group is on the opposite side of the plane, similar to that in PMSA, 2MPMSA and 3MPMSA. The amide hydrogen is thus available to a receptor molecule during its biological activity. The molecules in 23DMPMSA are packed into chains in the direction of b axis (Fig. 2) through N—H···O hydrogen bonds (Fig. 3 and Table 1).

For related literature, see: Gowda et al. (2007a,b,c,d,e,f,g); Jayalakshmi & Gowda (2004); Klug (1968).

Computing details top

Data collection: CrysAlis CCD (Oxford Diffraction, 2004); cell refinement: CrysAlis CCD; data reduction: CrysAlis RED (Oxford Diffraction, 2004); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 1997); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997); molecular graphics: PLATON (Spek, 2003); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXL97.

Figures top
[Figure 1] Fig. 1. Molecular structure of the title compound showing the atom labelling scheme. Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 50% probability level. H atoms are represented as small spheres of arbitrary radii.
[Figure 2] Fig. 2. The crystal packing of the title compound, viewed down the b axis.
[Figure 3] Fig. 3. Hydrogen bonding in the title compound. Hydrogen bonds are shown as dashed lines.
N-(2,3-dimethylphenyl)methanesulfonamide top
Crystal data top
C9H13NO2SF(000) = 424
Mr = 199.26Dx = 1.338 Mg m3
Orthorhombic, P212121Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: P 2ac 2abCell parameters from 2323 reflections
a = 5.2259 (6) Åθ = 3.6–23.2°
b = 5.5567 (8) ŵ = 0.30 mm1
c = 34.056 (1) ÅT = 301 K
V = 988.94 (18) Å3Prism, gray
Z = 40.50 × 0.44 × 0.22 mm
Data collection top
Oxford Diffraction Xcalibur
diffractometer with a Sapphire CCD detector
1831 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tubeRint = 0.068
Graphite monochromatorθmax = 26.4°, θmin = 4.1°
Rotation method data acquisition using ω scansh = 65
6529 measured reflectionsk = 66
2023 independent reflectionsl = 4042
Refinement top
Refinement on F2Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
Least-squares matrix: fullH atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.054 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0485P)2 + 0.7116P]
where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
wR(F2) = 0.130(Δ/σ)max = 0.035
S = 1.07Δρmax = 0.27 e Å3
2023 reflectionsΔρmin = 0.24 e Å3
122 parametersExtinction correction: SHELXL97, Fc*=kFc[1+0.001xFc2λ3/sin(2θ)]-1/4
1 restraintExtinction coefficient: 0.016 (4)
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methodsAbsolute structure: Flack (1983), 781 Friedel pairs
Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier mapAbsolute structure parameter: 0.22 (16)
Crystal data top
C9H13NO2SV = 988.94 (18) Å3
Mr = 199.26Z = 4
Orthorhombic, P212121Mo Kα radiation
a = 5.2259 (6) ŵ = 0.30 mm1
b = 5.5567 (8) ÅT = 301 K
c = 34.056 (1) Å0.50 × 0.44 × 0.22 mm
Data collection top
Oxford Diffraction Xcalibur
diffractometer with a Sapphire CCD detector
1831 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
6529 measured reflectionsRint = 0.068
2023 independent reflections
Refinement top
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.054H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
wR(F2) = 0.130Δρmax = 0.27 e Å3
S = 1.07Δρmin = 0.24 e Å3
2023 reflectionsAbsolute structure: Flack (1983), 781 Friedel pairs
122 parametersAbsolute structure parameter: 0.22 (16)
1 restraint
Special details top

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.

Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/Ueq
S20.70935 (16)0.32902 (18)0.19688 (2)0.0436 (3)
O30.4634 (4)0.4002 (5)0.18247 (8)0.0547 (7)
O40.8125 (6)0.4515 (5)0.22983 (8)0.0623 (8)
N50.9112 (5)0.3672 (6)0.16118 (8)0.0415 (7)
H5N1.067 (3)0.383 (8)0.1683 (10)0.050*
C10.7014 (10)0.0208 (8)0.20732 (12)0.0621 (11)
H1A0.86760.03110.21580.075*
H1B0.65340.06650.18410.075*
H1C0.57870.00930.22770.075*
C60.8579 (6)0.2927 (6)0.12190 (9)0.0404 (8)
C70.9912 (6)0.0995 (6)0.10470 (10)0.0422 (8)
C80.9385 (8)0.0450 (7)0.06527 (11)0.0518 (9)
C90.7513 (7)0.1698 (10)0.04547 (11)0.0622 (11)
H90.71360.12870.01960.075*
C100.6192 (8)0.3537 (10)0.06313 (11)0.0643 (12)
H100.49220.43480.04930.077*
C110.6736 (7)0.4186 (7)0.10106 (11)0.0526 (9)
H110.58730.54630.11270.063*
C121.0809 (9)0.1528 (10)0.04468 (13)0.0711 (12)
H12A1.04260.30400.05700.085*
H12B1.26150.12260.04620.085*
H12C1.02950.15830.01760.085*
C131.1869 (8)0.0438 (7)0.12723 (11)0.0530 (9)
H13A1.17310.00730.15470.064*
H13B1.35530.00310.11810.064*
H13C1.15710.21250.12320.064*
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top
U11U22U33U12U13U23
S20.0330 (4)0.0514 (5)0.0465 (4)0.0027 (4)0.0021 (3)0.0061 (4)
O30.0293 (12)0.0688 (18)0.0659 (16)0.0086 (12)0.0012 (11)0.0061 (13)
O40.0571 (16)0.0693 (18)0.0606 (15)0.0058 (16)0.0078 (14)0.0272 (14)
N50.0264 (12)0.0488 (17)0.0492 (16)0.0008 (14)0.0008 (11)0.0026 (13)
C10.068 (3)0.063 (2)0.056 (2)0.003 (2)0.001 (2)0.0135 (18)
C60.0276 (15)0.0455 (19)0.0480 (17)0.0013 (14)0.0009 (13)0.0069 (15)
C70.0344 (17)0.0362 (17)0.056 (2)0.0033 (14)0.0031 (15)0.0020 (14)
C80.048 (2)0.051 (2)0.056 (2)0.0109 (18)0.0101 (18)0.0011 (18)
C90.055 (2)0.085 (3)0.0461 (18)0.008 (3)0.0027 (17)0.003 (2)
C100.054 (2)0.087 (3)0.052 (2)0.014 (2)0.0065 (17)0.021 (2)
C110.047 (2)0.052 (2)0.059 (2)0.0118 (18)0.0027 (18)0.0139 (17)
C120.068 (3)0.075 (3)0.070 (3)0.008 (3)0.016 (2)0.021 (2)
C130.045 (2)0.047 (2)0.067 (2)0.0093 (19)0.0044 (19)0.0040 (17)
Geometric parameters (Å, º) top
S2—O41.419 (3)C8—C91.376 (6)
S2—O31.432 (2)C8—C121.501 (6)
S2—N51.623 (3)C9—C101.373 (6)
S2—C11.750 (4)C9—H90.9300
N5—C61.428 (4)C10—C111.371 (6)
N5—H5N0.854 (10)C10—H100.9300
C1—H1A0.9600C11—H110.9300
C1—H1B0.9600C12—H12A0.9600
C1—H1C0.9600C12—H12B0.9600
C6—C111.386 (5)C12—H12C0.9600
C6—C71.408 (5)C13—H13A0.9600
C7—C81.404 (5)C13—H13B0.9600
C7—C131.506 (5)C13—H13C0.9600
O4—S2—O3118.66 (18)C7—C8—C12120.5 (4)
O4—S2—N5106.41 (17)C10—C9—C8121.2 (4)
O3—S2—N5106.90 (15)C10—C9—H9119.4
O4—S2—C1108.5 (2)C8—C9—H9119.4
O3—S2—C1108.6 (2)C11—C10—C9120.3 (4)
N5—S2—C1107.20 (19)C11—C10—H10119.9
C6—N5—S2122.5 (2)C9—C10—H10119.9
C6—N5—H5N119 (3)C10—C11—C6119.6 (4)
S2—N5—H5N115 (2)C10—C11—H11120.2
S2—C1—H1A109.5C6—C11—H11120.2
S2—C1—H1B109.5C8—C12—H12A109.5
H1A—C1—H1B109.5C8—C12—H12B109.5
S2—C1—H1C109.5H12A—C12—H12B109.5
H1A—C1—H1C109.5C8—C12—H12C109.5
H1B—C1—H1C109.5H12A—C12—H12C109.5
C11—C6—C7121.1 (3)H12B—C12—H12C109.5
C11—C6—N5118.0 (3)C7—C13—H13A109.5
C7—C6—N5121.0 (3)C7—C13—H13B109.5
C8—C7—C6117.7 (3)H13A—C13—H13B109.5
C8—C7—C13120.4 (3)C7—C13—H13C109.5
C6—C7—C13121.8 (3)H13A—C13—H13C109.5
C9—C8—C7120.0 (4)H13B—C13—H13C109.5
C9—C8—C12119.5 (4)
O4—S2—N5—C6172.6 (3)C13—C7—C8—C9177.1 (4)
O3—S2—N5—C644.9 (3)C6—C7—C8—C12177.7 (3)
C1—S2—N5—C671.4 (3)C13—C7—C8—C121.5 (5)
S2—N5—C6—C1170.1 (4)C7—C8—C9—C102.2 (6)
S2—N5—C6—C7110.8 (3)C12—C8—C9—C10179.2 (4)
C11—C6—C7—C82.5 (5)C8—C9—C10—C110.6 (7)
N5—C6—C7—C8176.5 (3)C9—C10—C11—C61.9 (6)
C11—C6—C7—C13178.3 (3)C7—C6—C11—C100.2 (5)
N5—C6—C7—C132.7 (5)N5—C6—C11—C10179.3 (3)
C6—C7—C8—C93.7 (5)
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N5—H5N···O3i0.85 (1)2.13 (1)2.981 (4)175 (4)
Symmetry code: (i) x+1, y, z.

Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formulaC9H13NO2S
Mr199.26
Crystal system, space groupOrthorhombic, P212121
Temperature (K)301
a, b, c (Å)5.2259 (6), 5.5567 (8), 34.056 (1)
V3)988.94 (18)
Z4
Radiation typeMo Kα
µ (mm1)0.30
Crystal size (mm)0.50 × 0.44 × 0.22
Data collection
DiffractometerOxford Diffraction Xcalibur
diffractometer with a Sapphire CCD detector
Absorption correction
No. of measured, independent and
observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections
6529, 2023, 1831
Rint0.068
(sin θ/λ)max1)0.625
Refinement
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S 0.054, 0.130, 1.07
No. of reflections2023
No. of parameters122
No. of restraints1
H-atom treatmentH atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å3)0.27, 0.24
Absolute structureFlack (1983), 781 Friedel pairs
Absolute structure parameter0.22 (16)

Computer programs: CrysAlis CCD (Oxford Diffraction, 2004), CrysAlis CCD, CrysAlis RED (Oxford Diffraction, 2004), SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 1997), SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997), PLATON (Spek, 2003), SHELXL97.

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N5—H5N···O3i0.854 (10)2.130 (11)2.981 (4)175 (4)
Symmetry code: (i) x+1, y, z.
 

Follow Acta Cryst. E
Sign up for e-alerts
Follow Acta Cryst. on Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds