Download citation
Download citation
link to html
The title compound, C5H4INO, was synthesized during research aimed at producing suitable halogenated pyrrole building blocks for Suzuki–Miyaura coupling reactions. In the crystal structure, the mol­ecules are planar and exhibit N—H...O bonding to form centrosymmetric dimers.

Supporting information

cif

Crystallographic Information File (CIF) https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600536807044534/ng2326sup1.cif
Contains datablocks global, I

hkl

Structure factor file (CIF format) https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600536807044534/ng2326Isup2.hkl
Contains datablock I

CCDC reference: 663780

Key indicators

  • Single-crystal X-ray study
  • T = 295 K
  • Mean [sigma](C-C) = 0.006 Å
  • R factor = 0.026
  • wR factor = 0.068
  • Data-to-parameter ratio = 20.3

checkCIF/PLATON results

No syntax errors found



Alert level C ABSTM02_ALERT_3_C The ratio of expected to reported Tmax/Tmin(RR) is > 1.10 Tmin and Tmax reported: 0.250 0.533 Tmin and Tmax expected: 0.167 0.487 RR = 1.368 Please check that your absorption correction is appropriate. PLAT060_ALERT_3_C Ratio Tmax/Tmin (Exp-to-Rep) (too) Large ....... 1.35 PLAT062_ALERT_4_C Rescale T(min) & T(max) by ..................... 0.91
Alert level G ABSTM02_ALERT_3_G When printed, the submitted absorption T values will be replaced by the scaled T values. Since the ratio of scaled T's is identical to the ratio of reported T values, the scaling does not imply a change to the absorption corrections used in the study. Ratio of Tmax expected/reported 0.914 Tmax scaled 0.487 Tmin scaled 0.229
0 ALERT level A = In general: serious problem 0 ALERT level B = Potentially serious problem 3 ALERT level C = Check and explain 1 ALERT level G = General alerts; check 0 ALERT type 1 CIF construction/syntax error, inconsistent or missing data 0 ALERT type 2 Indicator that the structure model may be wrong or deficient 3 ALERT type 3 Indicator that the structure quality may be low 1 ALERT type 4 Improvement, methodology, query or suggestion 0 ALERT type 5 Informative message, check

Comment top

The title compound, (I), (Fig. 1) was synthesized during research aimed at producing suitable halogenated pyrrole building blocks for Suzuki–Miyaura coupling reactions (Miyaura & Suzuki, 1995; Davis et al., 2002). Although compound (I) has been previously synthesized using a variety of methods (Mitsui et al., 2003; Monti & Sleiter 1990; Sonnet, 1972) this is the first report of the X-ray crystal structure for 4-iodo-1H-pyrrole-2-carbaldehyde. As observed for related structures (Smith et al., 1985), the molecules are planar and exhibit N—H···O bonding to form centrosymmetric dimers (Fig. 2).

Related literature top

For related literature, see: Davis et al. (2002); Mitsui et al. (2003); Miyaura & Suzuki (1995); Monti & Sleiter (1990); Smith et al. (1985); Sonnet (1972).

Experimental top

The commercial reagent pyrrole-2-carbaldehyde (475 mg, 5 mmol) was added to an argon charged two-necked flask (50 ml) to which dry THF (20 ml) was added and the mixture stirred for 10 min before being cooled to 195 K. N-iodosuccinimide (1.12 g, 5 mmol) was added portionwise over 15 min then the mixture was stirred at 195 K for 1 h before being transferred to a 258 K refrigerator for 16 h. The solvent was removed under vacuum and the material was partitioned between H2O (50 ml) and DCM (2 x 50 ml). The organic phase was dried (MgSO4), then the DCM was evaporated under reduced pressure. The resulting residue was dissolved in DMSO (10 ml) then chromatographed over a C18 flash column (40 mm x 80 mm) using 10% stepwise elutions from 20% MeOH/80% H2O to 100% MeOH. The 70% MeOH/30% H2O elution contained a 9:1 mixture of 4-iodo-1H-pyrrole-2-carbaldehyde and 5-iodo-1H-pyrrole-2-carbaldehyde (165 mg), which proved to be inseparable by reversed-phase HPLC. Fractional crystallization using DCM/hexanes produced pure 4-iodo-1H-pyrrole-2-carbaldehyde (72 mg, 6.5% yield). Low yielding di-iodinated and tri-iodinated pyrrole derivatives were also detected during the purification work however no crystalline material was obtained for these compounds. NMR assignments for compound (I) were determined following analysis of the one-dimensional and two-dimensional NMR (1H, 13 C, gCOSY, gHSQC, gHMBC) data.

4-iodo-1H-pyrrole-2-carbaldehyde (I): clear needles, m.p. 390–391 K. 1H NMR (DMSO-d6, 600 MHz) δ 7.12 (1H, s, H-3), 7.33 (1H, s, H-5), 9.43 (1H, s, 2-CHO), 12.37 (1H, br s, 1-NH). 13C NMR (DMSO-d6, 150 MHz) δ 62.7 (C-4), 126.0 (C-3), 131.3 (C-5), 134.4 (C-2), 178.7 (2-CHO). (-)-LRESIMS (rel. int.) m/z 220 (100%) [M—H, C5H3INO]-.

Refinement top

The carbon-bound H atoms were constrained as riding atoms with C—H = 0.95–0.96 Å. The pyrrole proton was located in a difference Fourier synthesis and constrained with N—H = 0.88 Å. Uiso(H) values were set at 1.2Ueq of the parent atom.

Structure description top

The title compound, (I), (Fig. 1) was synthesized during research aimed at producing suitable halogenated pyrrole building blocks for Suzuki–Miyaura coupling reactions (Miyaura & Suzuki, 1995; Davis et al., 2002). Although compound (I) has been previously synthesized using a variety of methods (Mitsui et al., 2003; Monti & Sleiter 1990; Sonnet, 1972) this is the first report of the X-ray crystal structure for 4-iodo-1H-pyrrole-2-carbaldehyde. As observed for related structures (Smith et al., 1985), the molecules are planar and exhibit N—H···O bonding to form centrosymmetric dimers (Fig. 2).

For related literature, see: Davis et al. (2002); Mitsui et al. (2003); Miyaura & Suzuki (1995); Monti & Sleiter (1990); Smith et al. (1985); Sonnet (1972).

Computing details top

Data collection: MSC/AFC7 Diffractometer Control Software (Molecular Structure Corporation, 1999); cell refinement: MSC/AFC7 Diffractometer Control Software (Molecular Structure Corporation, 1999); data reduction: TEXSAN (Molecular Structure Corporation, 2001); program(s) used to solve structure: TEXSAN (Molecular Structure Corporation, 2001); program(s) used to refine structure: TEXSAN (Molecular Structure Corporation, 2001) and SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997); molecular graphics: ORTEP-3 (Farrugia, 1997); software used to prepare material for publication: TEXSAN (Molecular Structure Corporation, 2001) and PLATON (Spek, 2003).

Figures top
[Figure 1] Fig. 1. View of (I) with the atom numbering scheme. Displacement ellipsoids for non-H atoms are drawn at the 30% probability level.
[Figure 2] Fig. 2. View of the centrosymmetric dimers of (I).
4-iodo-1H-pyrrole-2-carbaldehyde top
Crystal data top
C5H4INOF(000) = 408
Mr = 220.99Dx = 2.243 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/cMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71069 Å
Hall symbol: -P 2ybcCell parameters from 25 reflections
a = 10.245 (3) Åθ = 12.5–16.3°
b = 4.726 (2) ŵ = 4.79 mm1
c = 13.531 (4) ÅT = 295 K
β = 92.73 (2)°Plate, colourless
V = 654.4 (4) Å30.40 × 0.40 × 0.15 mm
Z = 4
Data collection top
Rigaku AFC-7R
diffractometer
1281 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Radiation source: Rigaku rotating anodeRint = 0.018
Graphite monochromatorθmax = 27.5°, θmin = 3.0°
ω/2θ scansh = 1313
Absorption correction: ψ scan
(North et al., 1968)
k = 26
Tmin = 0.250, Tmax = 0.533l = 717
1793 measured reflections3 standard reflections every 150 reflections
1505 independent reflections intensity decay: 1.8%
Refinement top
Refinement on F2Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
Least-squares matrix: fullHydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.026H-atom parameters constrained
wR(F2) = 0.068 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0254P)2 + 0.8517P]
where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
S = 1.11(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
1505 reflectionsΔρmax = 0.56 e Å3
74 parametersΔρmin = 0.69 e Å3
0 restraintsExtinction correction: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997), Fc*=kFc[1+0.001Fc2λ3/sin(2θ)]-1/4
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methodsExtinction coefficient: 0.0057 (6)
Crystal data top
C5H4INOV = 654.4 (4) Å3
Mr = 220.99Z = 4
Monoclinic, P21/cMo Kα radiation
a = 10.245 (3) ŵ = 4.79 mm1
b = 4.726 (2) ÅT = 295 K
c = 13.531 (4) Å0.40 × 0.40 × 0.15 mm
β = 92.73 (2)°
Data collection top
Rigaku AFC-7R
diffractometer
1281 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Absorption correction: ψ scan
(North et al., 1968)
Rint = 0.018
Tmin = 0.250, Tmax = 0.5333 standard reflections every 150 reflections
1793 measured reflections intensity decay: 1.8%
1505 independent reflections
Refinement top
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.0260 restraints
wR(F2) = 0.068H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.11Δρmax = 0.56 e Å3
1505 reflectionsΔρmin = 0.69 e Å3
74 parameters
Special details top

Experimental. The scan width was (1.79 + 0.30tanθ)° with an ω scan speed of 16° per minute (up to 5 scans to achieve I/σ(I) > 10). Stationary background counts were recorded at each end of the scan, and the scan time:background time ratio was 2:1.

Geometry. Bond distances, angles etc. have been calculated using the rounded fractional coordinates. All su's are estimated from the variances of the (full) variance-covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account in the estimation of distances, angles and torsion angles

Refinement. Refinement on F2 for ALL reflections except those flagged by the user for potential systematic errors. Weighted R-factors wR and all goodness of fit values S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The observed criterion of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating -R-factor-obs etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R-factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/Ueq
I10.10101 (3)0.11438 (6)0.17038 (2)0.0593 (1)
O20.4065 (3)0.9850 (9)0.1241 (2)0.0696 (10)
N10.3783 (3)0.6731 (8)0.0582 (2)0.0536 (10)
C20.2945 (4)0.6628 (9)0.0239 (3)0.0521 (13)
C30.1952 (4)0.4801 (10)0.0045 (3)0.0531 (11)
C40.2196 (4)0.3788 (8)0.0908 (3)0.0490 (11)
C50.3333 (4)0.5006 (10)0.1282 (3)0.0547 (13)
C210.3154 (4)0.8263 (11)0.1112 (3)0.0601 (14)
H10.450700.773700.064200.0630*
H20.251400.807600.164600.0710*
H30.123000.428500.047900.0630*
H50.371000.465800.192800.0640*
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top
U11U22U33U12U13U23
I10.0656 (2)0.0567 (2)0.0560 (2)0.0093 (1)0.0078 (1)0.0053 (1)
O20.0663 (18)0.096 (2)0.0456 (15)0.0168 (18)0.0061 (13)0.0071 (17)
N10.0476 (16)0.071 (2)0.0417 (16)0.0030 (16)0.0029 (13)0.0036 (16)
C20.053 (2)0.065 (3)0.0376 (17)0.0046 (19)0.0053 (15)0.0039 (17)
C30.053 (2)0.062 (2)0.0435 (19)0.0021 (19)0.0067 (16)0.0025 (19)
C40.0533 (19)0.052 (2)0.0418 (18)0.0109 (17)0.0035 (15)0.0023 (17)
C50.056 (2)0.069 (3)0.0387 (18)0.013 (2)0.0017 (16)0.0012 (19)
C210.058 (2)0.081 (3)0.0404 (19)0.008 (2)0.0070 (16)0.002 (2)
Geometric parameters (Å, º) top
I1—C42.079 (4)C2—C211.436 (6)
O2—C211.216 (6)C3—C41.387 (6)
N1—C21.372 (5)C4—C51.374 (6)
N1—C51.348 (5)C3—H30.9500
N1—H10.8800C5—H50.9500
C2—C31.369 (6)C21—H20.9600
I1···C4i3.853 (4)C4···I1vii3.853 (4)
I1···C5i3.812 (5)C5···I1vii3.812 (5)
I1···I1ii3.8646 (17)C5···O2viii3.400 (5)
I1···I1iii3.8646 (17)C21···H1vi3.0900
I1···H2iv3.3200C21···H5v2.9100
O2···N12.900 (5)H1···O22.7500
O2···C5v3.400 (5)H1···O2vi2.0000
O2···N1vi2.843 (5)H1···C21vi3.0900
O2···H1vi2.0000H2···I1ix3.3200
O2···H12.7500H2···H5v2.5700
O2···H5v2.5000H5···O2viii2.5000
N1···O22.900 (5)H5···C21viii2.9100
N1···O2vi2.843 (5)H5···H2viii2.5700
C2—N1—C5109.0 (3)C3—C4—C5108.1 (4)
C5—N1—H1125.00N1—C5—C4107.9 (3)
C2—N1—H1126.00O2—C21—C2126.5 (4)
N1—C2—C21122.3 (4)C2—C3—H3127.00
N1—C2—C3108.0 (4)C4—C3—H3126.00
C3—C2—C21129.7 (4)N1—C5—H5128.00
C2—C3—C4107.1 (4)C4—C5—H5124.00
I1—C4—C5124.6 (3)O2—C21—H2117.00
I1—C4—C3127.2 (3)C2—C21—H2117.00
C5—N1—C2—C30.0 (5)C3—C2—C21—O2179.7 (5)
C5—N1—C2—C21179.5 (4)C2—C3—C4—I1175.5 (3)
C2—N1—C5—C40.1 (5)C2—C3—C4—C50.0 (5)
N1—C2—C3—C40.0 (5)I1—C4—C5—N1175.6 (3)
C21—C2—C3—C4179.4 (4)C3—C4—C5—N10.1 (5)
N1—C2—C21—O21.1 (7)
Symmetry codes: (i) x, y1, z; (ii) x, y1/2, z+1/2; (iii) x, y+1/2, z+1/2; (iv) x, y+1/2, z+1/2; (v) x, y+3/2, z1/2; (vi) x+1, y+2, z; (vii) x, y+1, z; (viii) x, y+3/2, z+1/2; (ix) x, y+1/2, z1/2.
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N1—H1···O2vi0.882.002.843 (5)161
C5—H5···O2viii0.952.503.400 (5)158
Symmetry codes: (vi) x+1, y+2, z; (viii) x, y+3/2, z+1/2.

Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formulaC5H4INO
Mr220.99
Crystal system, space groupMonoclinic, P21/c
Temperature (K)295
a, b, c (Å)10.245 (3), 4.726 (2), 13.531 (4)
β (°) 92.73 (2)
V3)654.4 (4)
Z4
Radiation typeMo Kα
µ (mm1)4.79
Crystal size (mm)0.40 × 0.40 × 0.15
Data collection
DiffractometerRigaku AFC-7R
Absorption correctionψ scan
(North et al., 1968)
Tmin, Tmax0.250, 0.533
No. of measured, independent and
observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections
1793, 1505, 1281
Rint0.018
(sin θ/λ)max1)0.650
Refinement
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S 0.026, 0.068, 1.11
No. of reflections1505
No. of parameters74
H-atom treatmentH-atom parameters constrained
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å3)0.56, 0.69

Computer programs: MSC/AFC7 Diffractometer Control Software (Molecular Structure Corporation, 1999), TEXSAN (Molecular Structure Corporation, 2001) and SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997), ORTEP-3 (Farrugia, 1997), TEXSAN (Molecular Structure Corporation, 2001) and PLATON (Spek, 2003).

Selected bond lengths (Å) top
I1—C42.079 (4)C2—C31.369 (6)
O2—C211.216 (6)C2—C211.436 (6)
N1—C21.372 (5)C3—C41.387 (6)
N1—C51.348 (5)C4—C51.374 (6)
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N1—H1···O2i0.882.002.843 (5)161
C5—H5···O2ii0.952.503.400 (5)158
Symmetry codes: (i) x+1, y+2, z; (ii) x, y+3/2, z+1/2.
 

Follow Acta Cryst. E
Sign up for e-alerts
Follow Acta Cryst. on Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds