Supporting information
Crystallographic Information File (CIF) https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600536807031091/om2142sup1.cif | |
Structure factor file (CIF format) https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600536807031091/om2142Isup2.hkl |
CCDC reference: 658977
A sample of 2,2'-dithio-bis(5-nitropyridine) was purchased from Aldrich. Crystals suitable for single-crystal x-ray diffraction analysis were grown by slow evaporation of a solution in ethyl acetate. FT—IR (KBr pellet, cm-1): ν (w, C– H) 3087, ν (s, N ═ O of NO2 asymmetric) 1563, ν (v.s. N ═ O of NO2 symmetric) 1343, ν (w, C - H disubstitution 1,4) 1958, ν (s, C - H disubstitution 1,4) 856, ν (w, C - N) 1101, ν (s, C ═ C) 1590, ν (w, C - H) 1006, (s, C ═ N) 1519, ν (w, C - S) 735, ν (w, S—S) 540.
In the final cycles of the refinement, all H atoms were constrained to ride on their parent atoms, with aryl C - H distances of 0.93 Å, and with Uiso(H) = 1.2Ueq(C). 112 unique reflections were not included in the data set as they were either partially obscured by the beam stop or were eliminated during data reduction.
This paper forms part of our continuing study of the synthesis and structural characterization of divalent sulfur compounds (Brito et al., 2006 and references therein). We are particularly interested in the utility of the title compound, (Fig. 1 and Table 1), as a flexible ligand, and its binding modes, for the fabrication of different coordination polymer topologies. A database survey of C—S—S—C fragments (Allen et al., 1987) found that S—S bond distances are bimodally distributed; for torsion angles in the ranges 75–105° and 0–20°, S—S bond-distance means were found to be 2.031 (15) and 2.070 (22) Å respectively. The corresponding value in the title compound is 2.0719 (11) Å, placing it in the upper quartile for Allen's first set. Further more, the torsion angles X—C—S—S, (where X=N or C), N2—C1—S1—S1i = 5.2 (3)° (symmetry code (i): -x + 1, -y + 1, -z) are close to 0 or 180° and within the range found in other substituted aromatic disulfides with an equatorial conformation according to the Shefter classification (Shefter, 1970). A search in the Cambridge Structural Database (version 5.28; Allen 2002) for the pyridyl disulfide fragment yielded fifteen structures of those which only two have an equatorial conformation, namely S,S'-bis(3-(Ethoxycarbonyl)pyridin-2-yl)disulfide (refcode TATPUA; Toma et al., 2004), and S,S'-bis(3-(n-Butoxycarbonyl)pyridin-2-yl)disulfide (refcode OCOYIO; Cindric et al., 2001). The C—S bond length of 1.761 (3) Å is between the value for a C—S single-bond distance of about 1.81 (2) Å and that for a double-bond distance of about 1.56 (4) Å (Etter et al., 1992) and is shorter than to those observed in organic disulfides with an equatorial conformation. Also noteworthy are the C—C—C, C—C—S and C—C—N angles at the ipso positions (Table 1), where the C—C—C angles, in particular, are consistent with the electron-donating and electron-withdrawing properties of thiolate and nitro substituents, respectively (Domenicano & Murray-Rust, 1979). The nitro group is nearly coplanar with the adjacent aryl ring (Fig. 1). The C4—N1 bond distance is 1.459 (4) Å; this value is typical of C(aryl)-NO2 distances, where the mean value is 1.468 Å (Allen et al., 1987) with upper and lower quartile values of 1.476 and 1.460 Å respectively.
Molecules of the title compound are linked into centrosymmetric R22(22) dimers by a simple C—H···O interaction,. [H···O = 2.58 Å, O···O = 3.389 (4) Å and C—H···O = 146°]. Nitro atom O2 in the molecule at (x + 1, y + 1, -z) acts as hydrogen-bond acceptor to a C2 atom H2 in the molecule at (x, y, z), so generating a centro-symmetric dimer characterized by R22(22) motif and centred at (1/2, 1/2, 0), Fig. 2, (Bernstein et al., 1995). Such interactions are generally the dominant feature of the crystal structures of compounds containing nitroarenethiolate (O2NC6H4SX) fragments (Kucsman et al., 1984; Aupers et al., 1999; Low et al., 2000; Glidewell et al., 2000), as well as those of simple nitrobenzenes (Boonstra, 1963; Trotter & Williston, 1966; Choi & Abel, 1972, Herbstein & Kapon, 1990; Boese et al., 1992; Sekine et al., 1994). The title compound retains equatorial conformation in its complex formed with AgNO3 (to within 22°) (López-Rodríguez et al., 2006). The coordination of silver(I) ion to either sulfur or nitrogen atoms of the title compound has not required an unusual X—C—S—S angle (X=C or N) angle, therefore the S—S bond is unaffected by complexation (2.031 (2) for the complex and 2.0719 (15) Å for the title compound). The larger observed deviation due to complexation is in the phenyl ring orientation (C—S—S—C = 70.8 (2)° for the complex and 180° for the title compound).
For related literature, see: Allen (2002); Allen et al. (1987); Aupers et al. (1999); Bernstein et al. (1995); Boese et al. (1992); Boonstra (1963); Brito et al. (2006); Choi & Abel (1972); Cindric et al. (2001); Domenicano & Murray-Rust (1979); Etter et al. (1992); Glidewell et al. (2000); Herbstein & Kapon (1990); Kucsman et al. (1984); López-Rodríguez et al. (2006); Low et al. (2000); Sekine et al. (1994); Shefter (1970); Toma et al. (2004); Trotter & Williston (1966).
Data collection: COLLECT (Nonius, 1998); cell refinement: DENZO–SMN (Otwinowski & Minor, 1997); data reduction: DENZO–SMN; program(s) used to solve structure: SIR97 (Altomare et al., 1999); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997); molecular graphics: ORTEP-3 for Windows (Farrugia, 1997) and PLATON (Spek, 2003); software used to prepare material for publication: WinGX (Farrugia, 1999).
C10H6N4O4S2 | F(000) = 316 |
Mr = 310.31 | Dx = 1.725 Mg m−3 |
Monoclinic, P21/n | Melting point = 428–430 K |
Hall symbol: -P 2yn | Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å |
a = 5.2610 (15) Å | Cell parameters from 2999 reflections |
b = 6.0440 (13) Å | θ = 3.5–27.5° |
c = 18.8070 (19) Å | µ = 0.47 mm−1 |
β = 92.839 (12)° | T = 293 K |
V = 597.3 (2) Å3 | Prism, colourless |
Z = 2 | 0.43 × 0.30 × 0.22 mm |
Nonius KappaCCD area-detector diffractometer | 1267 independent reflections |
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube | 1122 reflections with I > 2σ(I) |
Graphite monochromator | Rint = 0.067 |
φ scans, and ω scans with κ offsets | θmax = 27.5°, θmin = 3.5° |
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SORTAV; Blessing, 1995) | h = −6→6 |
Tmin = 0.842, Tmax = 0.901 | k = −6→7 |
3529 measured reflections | l = −19→24 |
Refinement on F2 | 0 restraints |
Least-squares matrix: full | H-atom parameters constrained |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.059 | w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + 1.3711P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3 |
wR(F2) = 0.139 | (Δ/σ)max = 0.014 |
S = 1.08 | Δρmax = 0.48 e Å−3 |
1267 reflections | Δρmin = −0.31 e Å−3 |
91 parameters |
C10H6N4O4S2 | V = 597.3 (2) Å3 |
Mr = 310.31 | Z = 2 |
Monoclinic, P21/n | Mo Kα radiation |
a = 5.2610 (15) Å | µ = 0.47 mm−1 |
b = 6.0440 (13) Å | T = 293 K |
c = 18.8070 (19) Å | 0.43 × 0.30 × 0.22 mm |
β = 92.839 (12)° |
Nonius KappaCCD area-detector diffractometer | 1267 independent reflections |
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SORTAV; Blessing, 1995) | 1122 reflections with I > 2σ(I) |
Tmin = 0.842, Tmax = 0.901 | Rint = 0.067 |
3529 measured reflections |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.059 | 0 restraints |
wR(F2) = 0.139 | H-atom parameters constrained |
S = 1.08 | Δρmax = 0.48 e Å−3 |
1267 reflections | Δρmin = −0.31 e Å−3 |
91 parameters |
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes. |
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger. |
x | y | z | Uiso*/Ueq | ||
S1 | 0.64977 (15) | 0.47850 (13) | 0.03722 (4) | 0.0348 (3) | |
O1 | 0.4118 (5) | −0.4104 (4) | 0.22547 (13) | 0.0486 (7) | |
O2 | 0.0696 (5) | −0.3958 (5) | 0.15797 (16) | 0.0615 (9) | |
N1 | 0.2791 (5) | −0.3234 (5) | 0.17826 (13) | 0.0345 (6) | |
N2 | 0.3161 (5) | 0.1460 (4) | 0.05263 (13) | 0.0314 (6) | |
C1 | 0.5303 (6) | 0.2418 (5) | 0.07878 (15) | 0.0285 (6) | |
C2 | 0.6740 (6) | 0.1634 (5) | 0.13849 (16) | 0.0328 (7) | |
H2 | 0.8211 | 0.2363 | 0.155 | 0.039* | |
C3 | 0.5917 (6) | −0.0239 (5) | 0.17193 (16) | 0.0322 (7) | |
H3 | 0.6816 | −0.0821 | 0.2114 | 0.039* | |
C4 | 0.3700 (6) | −0.1227 (5) | 0.14469 (15) | 0.0281 (6) | |
C5 | 0.2369 (6) | −0.0362 (5) | 0.08584 (16) | 0.0309 (6) | |
H5 | 0.0886 | −0.1061 | 0.0688 | 0.037* |
U11 | U22 | U33 | U12 | U13 | U23 | |
S1 | 0.0363 (5) | 0.0301 (4) | 0.0372 (4) | −0.0081 (3) | −0.0048 (3) | 0.0063 (3) |
O1 | 0.0510 (15) | 0.0434 (15) | 0.0504 (14) | −0.0051 (12) | −0.0078 (11) | 0.0192 (11) |
O2 | 0.0546 (17) | 0.0570 (18) | 0.0706 (18) | −0.0317 (15) | −0.0185 (13) | 0.0224 (15) |
N1 | 0.0384 (15) | 0.0303 (14) | 0.0346 (13) | −0.0055 (11) | 0.0002 (11) | 0.0023 (11) |
N2 | 0.0293 (13) | 0.0298 (14) | 0.0347 (13) | −0.0020 (11) | −0.0022 (10) | 0.0018 (10) |
C1 | 0.0319 (15) | 0.0249 (14) | 0.0289 (14) | −0.0001 (12) | 0.0037 (11) | −0.0011 (11) |
C2 | 0.0306 (15) | 0.0326 (17) | 0.0347 (15) | −0.0058 (13) | −0.0029 (12) | −0.0004 (12) |
C3 | 0.0338 (16) | 0.0321 (16) | 0.0300 (14) | 0.0016 (13) | −0.0042 (11) | 0.0025 (12) |
C4 | 0.0298 (15) | 0.0236 (14) | 0.0311 (14) | 0.0000 (12) | 0.0026 (11) | −0.0002 (11) |
C5 | 0.0299 (15) | 0.0299 (16) | 0.0327 (15) | −0.0043 (12) | −0.0006 (11) | −0.0007 (12) |
S1—C1 | 1.761 (3) | C1—C2 | 1.405 (4) |
S1—S1i | 2.0719 (15) | C2—C3 | 1.375 (4) |
O1—N1 | 1.221 (3) | C2—H2 | 0.93 |
O2—N1 | 1.229 (4) | C3—C4 | 1.386 (4) |
N1—C4 | 1.459 (4) | C3—H3 | 0.93 |
N2—C1 | 1.339 (4) | C4—C5 | 1.383 (4) |
N2—C5 | 1.343 (4) | C5—H5 | 0.93 |
C1—S1—S1i | 97.22 (11) | C1—C2—H2 | 120.9 |
O1—N1—O2 | 123.0 (3) | C2—C3—C4 | 117.7 (3) |
O1—N1—C4 | 119.0 (3) | C2—C3—H3 | 121.2 |
O2—N1—C4 | 118.0 (3) | C4—C3—H3 | 121.2 |
C1—N2—C5 | 117.3 (3) | C5—C4—C3 | 121.1 (3) |
N2—C1—C2 | 123.9 (3) | C5—C4—N1 | 119.8 (3) |
N2—C1—S1 | 120.0 (2) | C3—C4—N1 | 119.1 (3) |
C2—C1—S1 | 116.0 (2) | N2—C5—C4 | 121.7 (3) |
C3—C2—C1 | 118.3 (3) | N2—C5—H5 | 119.1 |
C3—C2—H2 | 120.9 | C4—C5—H5 | 119.1 |
C5—N2—C1—C2 | −0.3 (5) | C2—C3—C4—N1 | 179.1 (3) |
C5—N2—C1—S1 | 178.9 (2) | O1—N1—C4—C5 | 172.6 (3) |
S1i—S1—C1—N2 | 5.2 (3) | O2—N1—C4—C5 | −8.2 (4) |
S1i—S1—C1—C2 | −175.5 (2) | O1—N1—C4—C3 | −6.4 (4) |
N2—C1—C2—C3 | 0.6 (5) | O2—N1—C4—C3 | 172.8 (3) |
S1—C1—C2—C3 | −178.6 (2) | C1—N2—C5—C4 | 0.0 (4) |
C1—C2—C3—C4 | −0.5 (5) | C3—C4—C5—N2 | 0.1 (5) |
C2—C3—C4—C5 | 0.2 (5) | N1—C4—C5—N2 | −178.9 (3) |
Symmetry code: (i) −x+1, −y+1, −z. |
D—H···A | D—H | H···A | D···A | D—H···A |
C2—H2···O2ii | 0.93 | 2.58 | 3.389 (4) | 146 |
Symmetry code: (ii) x+1, y+1, z. |
Experimental details
Crystal data | |
Chemical formula | C10H6N4O4S2 |
Mr | 310.31 |
Crystal system, space group | Monoclinic, P21/n |
Temperature (K) | 293 |
a, b, c (Å) | 5.2610 (15), 6.0440 (13), 18.8070 (19) |
β (°) | 92.839 (12) |
V (Å3) | 597.3 (2) |
Z | 2 |
Radiation type | Mo Kα |
µ (mm−1) | 0.47 |
Crystal size (mm) | 0.43 × 0.30 × 0.22 |
Data collection | |
Diffractometer | Nonius KappaCCD area-detector |
Absorption correction | Multi-scan (SORTAV; Blessing, 1995) |
Tmin, Tmax | 0.842, 0.901 |
No. of measured, independent and observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections | 3529, 1267, 1122 |
Rint | 0.067 |
(sin θ/λ)max (Å−1) | 0.650 |
Refinement | |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S | 0.059, 0.139, 1.08 |
No. of reflections | 1267 |
No. of parameters | 91 |
H-atom treatment | H-atom parameters constrained |
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å−3) | 0.48, −0.31 |
Computer programs: COLLECT (Nonius, 1998), DENZO–SMN (Otwinowski & Minor, 1997), DENZO–SMN, SIR97 (Altomare et al., 1999), SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997), ORTEP-3 for Windows (Farrugia, 1997) and PLATON (Spek, 2003), WinGX (Farrugia, 1999).
C1—S1—S1i | 97.22 (11) | C2—C1—S1 | 116.0 (2) |
N2—C1—C2 | 123.9 (3) | C3—C2—C1 | 118.3 (3) |
N2—C1—S1 | 120.0 (2) | C5—C4—N1 | 119.8 (3) |
Symmetry code: (i) −x+1, −y+1, −z. |
D—H···A | D—H | H···A | D···A | D—H···A |
C2—H2···O2ii | 0.93 | 2.58 | 3.389 (4) | 146 |
Symmetry code: (ii) x+1, y+1, z. |
This paper forms part of our continuing study of the synthesis and structural characterization of divalent sulfur compounds (Brito et al., 2006 and references therein). We are particularly interested in the utility of the title compound, (Fig. 1 and Table 1), as a flexible ligand, and its binding modes, for the fabrication of different coordination polymer topologies. A database survey of C—S—S—C fragments (Allen et al., 1987) found that S—S bond distances are bimodally distributed; for torsion angles in the ranges 75–105° and 0–20°, S—S bond-distance means were found to be 2.031 (15) and 2.070 (22) Å respectively. The corresponding value in the title compound is 2.0719 (11) Å, placing it in the upper quartile for Allen's first set. Further more, the torsion angles X—C—S—S, (where X=N or C), N2—C1—S1—S1i = 5.2 (3)° (symmetry code (i): -x + 1, -y + 1, -z) are close to 0 or 180° and within the range found in other substituted aromatic disulfides with an equatorial conformation according to the Shefter classification (Shefter, 1970). A search in the Cambridge Structural Database (version 5.28; Allen 2002) for the pyridyl disulfide fragment yielded fifteen structures of those which only two have an equatorial conformation, namely S,S'-bis(3-(Ethoxycarbonyl)pyridin-2-yl)disulfide (refcode TATPUA; Toma et al., 2004), and S,S'-bis(3-(n-Butoxycarbonyl)pyridin-2-yl)disulfide (refcode OCOYIO; Cindric et al., 2001). The C—S bond length of 1.761 (3) Å is between the value for a C—S single-bond distance of about 1.81 (2) Å and that for a double-bond distance of about 1.56 (4) Å (Etter et al., 1992) and is shorter than to those observed in organic disulfides with an equatorial conformation. Also noteworthy are the C—C—C, C—C—S and C—C—N angles at the ipso positions (Table 1), where the C—C—C angles, in particular, are consistent with the electron-donating and electron-withdrawing properties of thiolate and nitro substituents, respectively (Domenicano & Murray-Rust, 1979). The nitro group is nearly coplanar with the adjacent aryl ring (Fig. 1). The C4—N1 bond distance is 1.459 (4) Å; this value is typical of C(aryl)-NO2 distances, where the mean value is 1.468 Å (Allen et al., 1987) with upper and lower quartile values of 1.476 and 1.460 Å respectively.
Molecules of the title compound are linked into centrosymmetric R22(22) dimers by a simple C—H···O interaction,. [H···O = 2.58 Å, O···O = 3.389 (4) Å and C—H···O = 146°]. Nitro atom O2 in the molecule at (x + 1, y + 1, -z) acts as hydrogen-bond acceptor to a C2 atom H2 in the molecule at (x, y, z), so generating a centro-symmetric dimer characterized by R22(22) motif and centred at (1/2, 1/2, 0), Fig. 2, (Bernstein et al., 1995). Such interactions are generally the dominant feature of the crystal structures of compounds containing nitroarenethiolate (O2NC6H4SX) fragments (Kucsman et al., 1984; Aupers et al., 1999; Low et al., 2000; Glidewell et al., 2000), as well as those of simple nitrobenzenes (Boonstra, 1963; Trotter & Williston, 1966; Choi & Abel, 1972, Herbstein & Kapon, 1990; Boese et al., 1992; Sekine et al., 1994). The title compound retains equatorial conformation in its complex formed with AgNO3 (to within 22°) (López-Rodríguez et al., 2006). The coordination of silver(I) ion to either sulfur or nitrogen atoms of the title compound has not required an unusual X—C—S—S angle (X=C or N) angle, therefore the S—S bond is unaffected by complexation (2.031 (2) for the complex and 2.0719 (15) Å for the title compound). The larger observed deviation due to complexation is in the phenyl ring orientation (C—S—S—C = 70.8 (2)° for the complex and 180° for the title compound).