Download citation
Download citation
link to html
The quality of X-ray powder diffraction data and the number and type of refinable parameters have been examined with respect to their effect on quantitative phase analysis (QPA) by the Rietveld method using data collected from two samples from the QPA round robin [Madsen, Scarlett, Cranswick & Lwin (2001). J. Appl. Cryst. 34, 409–426]. From the analyses of these best-case-scenario specimens, a series of recommendations for minimum standards of data collection and analysis are proposed. It is hoped that these will aid new QPA-by-Rietveld users in their analyses.

Supporting information

zip

Zip compressed file https://doi.org/10.1107/S160057672100371X/vb5009sup1.zip
Summary data as described in S3.1 - no zero error

zip

Zip compressed file https://doi.org/10.1107/S160057672100371X/vb5009sup2.zip
Summary data as described in S3.1 - with zero error

pdf

Portable Document Format (PDF) file https://doi.org/10.1107/S160057672100371X/vb5009sup3.pdf
Supplementary figures and tables

link

Link https://doi.org/10.25917/nvsw-0044
Raw data, as described in S3.1 - no zero error

link

Link https://doi.org/10.25917/5f44ad65411cc
Raw data, as described in S3.1 - with zero error


Follow J. Appl. Cryst.
Sign up for e-alerts
Follow J. Appl. Cryst. on Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds