short communications
Dead-time correction of a multi-element SSD for fluorescent XAFS
aPhoton Factory, Institute of Materials Structure Science, KEK, Oho, Tsukuba 305, Japan
*Correspondence e-mail: masaharu.nomura@kek.jp
The correct evaluation of the live time of a detection system is found to be important for correcting the 5 counts s−1 channel−1 with <270 eV FWHM for Mn Kα has been realized; the was independent of the incoming photon energy.
of a multi-element detection system for fluorescent experiments. Synchronous resetting of preamplifiers and the suspension of electronics during the reset period is an effective method. The of the incoming count rate should also be corrected, since its non-linearity cannot be neglected. A 19-element solid-state detector system which can count up to 3.7 × 101. Introduction
A multi-element solid-state detector (SSD) is often used to obtain fluorescent etc. (Cramer et al., 1988; Derbyshire et al., 1991). A high energy resolution is required in order to extract a faint fluorescent signal from intense scattering and background fluorescence signals, which is essential for improving the signal-to-noise ratio (Warburton, 1986). A high-counting-rate capability is required at the same time in order to measure a spectrum within a reasonable period. However, a high energy resolution and a high-counting-rate capability could not be realized at the same time. Reset-type preamplifiers have been developed to meet the high-counting-rate requirement without seriously sacrificing the energy resolution.
spectra of dilute samples, thin filmsThe reset rate of a preamplifier is determined by both the incoming
and the photon energy (energy rate). Usually, a dead-time correction is carried out assuming that the pulse-height distribution (PHD) is independent of the However, the PHD changes due to the sample composition and the energy of the primary X-rays in the case of fluorescent Thus, the conventional system gave a different dead-time value under each experimental condition. A 19-element SSD with a fairly high energy resolution and high-counting-rate capability has been constructed. Its performance and a simple system designed to give a unique independent of the photon energy are described.2. Construction of the detection system
Nineteen individual pure-Ge detectors (Canberra GL0110P, 100 mm2 each) are assembled in a cryostat. Each detector is coupled to a compact pentafet preamplifier (Nashashibi, 1992) which is essentially a low-noise device with a short reset time. The rather conventional signal-processing system consists of the following electronics: spectroscopy amplifiers (Canberra 2026XA), single-channel analysers (SCAs) (Oxford TC 452), a timing pulse generator (Kinetics 3655-L1A) and scalers (LeCroy 4434). A short shaping time, such as 0.25 µs, is usually used to meet the high Both the SCA output and ICR (incoming count rate) pulses from amplifiers were counted in the scalers.
In order to evaluate the live time of the preamplifiers, all of the preamplifiers are reset synchronously when a reset signal is issued by a preamplifier. The timing pulse generator and scalers are also suspended during the reset period. A Kinetics 3655 was modified to realize such a function. Although the reset period is determined by the shortest one in 19 preamplifiers, this is an economical system to evaluate the live time of preamplifiers and to apply the same time gate to I0. Furthermore, this system is free from any cross talk of the reset signal of the preamplifiers.
Fluorescence from a copper foil was detected by the SSD, whose intensity was controlled by changing the opening of a slit placed after a focusing mirror (Nomura & Koyama, 1996). Since the metal foil was placed after a 1 mm-square receiving slit, the same area was irradiated independent of the opening of the slit. The intensity of the primary X-ray was measured by an placed between the receiving slit and the sample, which should be proportional to the fluorescence intensity. The output of the was processed as usual and the output pulse of a voltage-to-frequency converter (VFC) was counted by the scaler. Higher orders were reduced to less than 10−6 of the fundamental by detuning a double-crystal monochromator.
3. Performance
3.1. Performance of the detection system
The energy resolution was measured with Mn Kα from 55Fe, for which the was ∼50 kcounts s−1. The average FWHM of 19 detectors was 178, 206 and 246 eV and the worst one was 193, 224 and 269 eV when the shaping time of the spectroscopy amplifiers was chosen to be 1, 0.5 and 0.25 µs, respectively.
Relative throughput curves on a channel are shown in Fig. 1 as a function of the shaping time. Here, the vertical axis indicates the SCA output rate that is windowed for Cu Kα radiation, whereas the horizontal axis indicates ICR. Thus, the ratio of both axes does not represent the absolute throughput. The observed values (dots) were fitted well with an equation up to 370 kcounts s−1 when a 0.25 µs shaping time was adopted, which indicates the high counting capability of the detection system: 7 Mcounts s−1 for 19 channels. Details of the fitting equation are described in the next section.
3.2. Dead-time correction
The relative throughput curves were fitted with an equation of the first-order approximation of the paralyzable and non-paralyzable models (Zhang et al., 1993). This is expressed as
where m is the apparent through an SCA window, n is the ICR, τ2 is the usually used and β is a proportional factor which depends on the SCA window and the PHD. This equation gave a slightly better fit than those for paralyzable or non-paralyzable models. The fitted curves with this equation are shown in Fig. 1 along with the observed data, which indicate that equation (1) is a good approximation up to high counting rates. The (τ2) obtained from the fitting was 4.3, 2.1 and 1 µs for shaping times of 1, 0.5 and 0.25 µs, respectively.
The ICR is usually thought to express the true incoming rate, which is a good approximation when the shaping time is sufficiently long. However, this assumption is not correct when a short shaping time, such as 0.25 µs, is used. The ratios of ICR and I0 were measured as a function of the If the response of both detection systems is ideal, the ratio should be constant, independent of the However, the ratio ICR/I0 at ICR = 370 kcounts s−1 decreased by 10% compared with that at low counting rates, which indicates that the of ICR cannot be overlooked. The linearity of the was confirmed by other experiments. Also, if it does not respond linearly and the ICR responds linearly, the ratio ICR/I0 should increase along with an increase in the which is contrary to the experimental result.
By putting the true ICR as αI0, the apparent ICR can be expressed as
where I0 is the output frequency of the VFC, τ1 is the of ICR and α is a proportional factor. By modifying the equation, I0 can be approximated as
τ1 was ∼0.28 µs, which is not sufficiently short compared with τ2.
Therefore, a correction of the τ1 and τ2. The true SCA windowed signal (m0) can be expressed as
was carried out for bothCorrected counting rates both with and without τ1 contribution are compared in Fig. 2. The correction, excluding the of ICR (τ1), shows a significant deviation from that including it at high counting rates, indicating the significance of the ICR dead time.
3.3. Effect of a live-time evaluation
In the present system, the timer and scalers were suspended during the reset period of the preamplifiers. The reset frequency of the preamplifiers is determined by the energy rate, i.e. the integrated photon energy in unit time. Therefore, if the live times of the preamplifiers are not correctly evaluated, the for ICR (τ1) should depend on the incoming photon energy. This is a serious problem for fluorescent experiments, since the PHD changes due to the sample composition and at each energy.
The Kα (8041 eV) and Au Lα (9685 eV) radiation; the results are compared in Figs. 3(a) and 3(b). The measured without suspending the electronics changed with the photon energy, as shown in Fig. 3(a). The increase in τ1 for Au Lα is due to an increase in the reset rate due to the higher photon energy, even at the same ICR. Another reason is that I0 was counted during the reset period. On the other hand, those measured during suspension of the electronics did not change along with the photon energy. Similar results were obtained when both Cu Kα and Au Lα were detected simultaneously. It is thus important to evaluate the live time of the system correctly. In order to evaluate the live time, a synchronous reset of all the preamplifiers and suspension of the electronics during the reset period is an effective method.
was compared using two characteristic radiations of different energies: Cu3.4. Effect of the operation mode
The dead times obtained from equations (1)–(4) should depend on the operation mode of the storage ring. When the storage ring is operated in the single-bunch mode, it should be particularly prominent as the photons enter the detector within a short period and a fairly long recovery time is kept after that. Although the stored current was about 60 mA, which is one-sixth of that in the multi-bunch operation mode, a more than 30 times intense X-ray pulse enters the detector within 100 ps every 0.6 µs at the Photon Factory. A test experiment was carried out during single-bunch mode; the derived dead times are compared with those measured during the multi-bunch mode in Fig. 3(c). τ1 increased from 0.28 to 0.39 µs, whereas τ2 decreased from 1.0 to 0.91 µs in detector #10; the other channels showed a similar tendency. This tendency supports the above-described idea. Thus, the must be obtained for each operation mode of each storage ring.
Acknowledgements
The author thanks Dr Derbyshire of Daresbury Laboratory for his advise and Mr Ogasawara of Toyo Corporation and Mr Tench of Canberra for their technical support. Kinetics Co. is acknowledged for their technical advice in modifying the 3655-CAMAC module.
References
Cramer, S. P., Tench, O., Yocum, M. & George, G. N. (1988). Nucl. Instrum. Methods, A266, 586–591. CrossRef CAS Web of Science
Derbyshire, G. E., Farrow, R. C., Bilsborrow, R. L., Morrell, C., Greaves, G. N. & Dobson, B. R. (1991). Adv. X-ray Anal. 34, 187–191. CAS
Nashashibi, T. (1992). Nucl. Instrum. Methods, A322, 551–556. CrossRef CAS Web of Science
Nomura, M. & Koyama, A. (1996). KEK Report 95–15. KEK, Tsukuba 305, Japan.
Warburton, W. K. (1986). Nucl. Instrum. Methods, A246, 541–544. CAS
Zhang, K., Rosenbaum, G. & Bunker, G. (1993). Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. Suppl. 32(2), 147–149. CrossRef
© International Union of Crystallography. Prior permission is not required to reproduce short quotations, tables and figures from this article, provided the original authors and source are cited. For more information, click here.