short communications
Valence-difference contrast measurements utilizing X-ray anomalous scattering
aMaterials and Structures Laboratory, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Nagatsuta 4259, Midori, Yokohama 226-8503, Japan
*Correspondence e-mail: sasaki@n.cc.titech.ac.jp
2+ and Fe3+ obtained from both absorption and diffraction data have a large difference in f′ between the two kinds of ions. Using a valence-difference contrast method, Bragg and diffuse scattering measurements were carried out for single crystals of Fe3O4 at low temperatures. The results demonstrate the ability of the contrast method to resolve charge ordering and valence fluctuation details.
experiments with X-ray wavelengths close to an have made it possible to determine independently the behaviour of ions in different valence states. The factors of FeKeywords: valence-difference contrast methods; valence contrast methods; anomalous scattering; magnetite; Fe3O4.
1. Introduction
X-ray diffraction is a powerful tool to determine a et al., 1979). The use of for different oxidation states is a relatively new technique, although many attempts have been made, for example, for such compounds as Eu3O4, α-Fe2PO5, Fe3O4, YBa2Cu3O6, GaCl2 and NbSe3 (Kwei et al., 1990; Attfield, 1990; Wilkinson et al., 1991; Warner et al., 1992; Gao et al., 1992, 1993; Sasaki, 1995; Toyoda et al., 1997). It is still in dispute whether such f′ values have enough accuracy to be of practical use in structural refinements.
composed of several kinds of atoms, where the determination ability depends upon the difference in atomic scattering factors. The difference can be enhanced when the effect is dominant at a wavelength close to an In XANES (X-ray absorption near-edge structure) spectra, it is known that the change of the energy levels of valence electrons gives a of up to several eV. The oxidation numbers for various valence ions cause chemical shifts on pre- and main-edge peaks (SarodeIn the coordination of octahedral O atoms, a 2+ and Fe3+ ions has been estimated as 5 eV from the observation of XANES spectra (Sasaki, 1995). Based on the algorithm by Cromer & Liberman (1970) and absorption data, experimental f′ values have been reported for Fe2+ and Fe3+ ions, where there is a large f′ difference of 2.5 between ferrous and ferric ions at λ = 1.7415 Å. The Kramers–Kronig transformation is also useful to estimate f′ from f′′.
between FeIn this paper we aim to establish a method to contrast valence differences. We examine experimental f′ values for making the contrast, based on the wavelength-dependent diffraction intensities of Fe3O4 at the Fe K-edge. Furthermore, we demonstrate the ability of the valence-difference contrast method to determine charge ordering and valence fluctuation at low temperatures.
2. Experimental
Magnetite (Fe3O4, inverse-spinel structure, cubic, Fdm, a = 8.375 ± 0.002 Å) was used in this study. The single crystals were prepared by several methods: (S1) a spherical crystal, 0.08 mm in diameter, grown from Fe3O4 powders at 1300 K in an evacuated silica tube; (S2) a spherical crystal, 0.13 mm in diameter, grown from Fe3O4 powders at 673 K in a 5M NH4Cl solution in an Au tube; (S3) a parallelepiped crystal of 0.3 × 0.3 × 0.3 mm grown from Fe3O4 powders in a Pt–10%Rh crucible by the Bridgman method in a CO–CO2 atmosphere. Spherical crystals were prepared by air-rolling on fine sandpaper by the Bond method.
Synchrotron experiments were performed at BL-10A at the Photon Factory using a vertical-type four-circle diffractometer. An Si(111) monochromator was used in a horizontal dispersion setting to select the X-ray wavelengths. Wavelength calibrations were made by measuring the XANES spectra of Fe foil and FeO.
3. Wavelength dependency of factors
Magnetite has two kinds of crystallographically distinguished cation sites, A and B, where the tetrahedral A site is occupied only by Fe3+ ions and the octahedral B site is equally occupied by Fe2+ and Fe3+ ions. From the occupancy difference of Fe ions between the two sites, a feasibility study on f′ values has been carried out.
Intensity profiles of magnetite (S1) were collected in ω–2θ step-scan mode for seven wavelengths at the longer wavelength side of the Fe K-absorption edge: λ = 1.7415, 1.7420, 1.7425, 1.7431, 1.7452, 1.7499 and 1.7567 Å, corresponding to 0, −2.2, −4.3, −6.5, −15.1, −34.3 and −61.9 eV in E − E0, respectively. Each profile consists of 80 steps at an ω interval of 0.02° measured for 1 s per step. The intensity decrease of the incident beam was corrected using the 222 reflection as a standard. Each set of integrated intensities was corrected for the factor and the absorption effect.
The wavelength dependency of the observed structure factors, Fobs, is plotted in Fig. 1(a). A δE, can be observed between the A and B sites which corresponds to a valence difference of 0.5 e. It is noted that the normalized Fobs related to the B sites is smaller than that of the A sites, and is comparable with the change of f′ in Fig. 1(b). It implies that the A sites are mostly occupied by Fe3+, while the B sites can be assigned to Fe2.5+ as a result of the continuous interchange of electrons between Fe2+ and Fe3+. Thus, the existence of the f′ difference between the two sites is indeed promising for studying mixed-valence compounds.
4. Low-temperature crystallography
The high electrical conductivity of magnetite at room temperature appears to be due to `hopping' in a mixed-valence state between Fe2+ and Fe3+. The spinel phase transforms to a lower symmetry form below the temperature (TV ≃ 123 K). Verwey et al. (1947) proposed an ordering scheme in which alternative Fe2+ and Fe3+ ions exist along the c axis. Samuelsen et al. (1968) and Yamada et al. (1968) reported observations of the (h, 0, l + 1/2)-type reflections by neutron and electron diffraction methods, respectively. Several authors proposed the structure of a low-temperature phase based on a rhombohedral, monoclinic or triclinic cell (e.g. Iizumi et al., 1982). However, complicated below TV still remains a controversy for this crystal structure.
Low-temperature experiments were conducted at 102 K using a cooling device to generate a cold and dry gas stream from liquid nitrogen, blown directly onto the crystal (S2). The temperature calibration was made at the sample position (Toyoda et al., 1997). Intensity data were collected using the ω–2θ step-scan mode within a hemisphere (or one-eighth) of up to 2θ = 114°.
Fig. 2 shows the intensity profiles of extra reflections indexed as (a) 0 31/2 4 and 0 41/2 4, and (b) 0 4 31/2 and 0 4 41/2, based on a cubic cell, suggesting the existence of a low-temperature phase of magnetite. A subset of the half-indexed reflections are listed in Table 1. The extra reflections are caused by a lowering of the crystal symmetry where there would be charge ordering of Fe2+ and Fe3+ ions as well as the lattice deformation associated with atomic position shifts. The obtained here is Cmcm with a doubled cell of a = 2a1 + 2a2, b = −2a1 + 2a2, c = 2a3. It is noteable that in Fig. 2 the half-integer reflections give a large difference in diffraction intensity between two wavelengths: f′(Fe2+) − f′(Fe3+) = −1.6 at λ = 1.7421 Å and −0.18 at λ = 1.7499 Å.
|
5. X-ray diffuse scattering
Diffuse scattering associated with charge ordering was studied using the valence-difference contrast method. A valence fluctuation between Fe2+ and Fe3+ ions above TV was detected for the first time by means of X-ray scattering (Toyoda et al., 1997). The appearance of similar diffuse streaks is already reported from neutron and electron diffraction studies, based on the contrast caused by the displacement of the O atoms (Shapiro et al., 1976; Chiba et al., 1975). A molecular polaron model has been proposed for the neutron diffuse streaks (Yamada et al., 1979).
The wavelength used here is 1.7421 Å with an energy resolution of ΔE/E ≃ 10−4 and an f′ difference of 1.6 between Fe2+ and Fe3+. The 400, 800, 440, 221 and 444 reflections of magnetite (S3) were measured at 130 K by stationary counting of 10 s per step at each point of a 20 × 20 grid in the plane.
The intensity distribution of diffuse scattering around a 440 ). The diffuse streaks shown in Fig. 3(a) elongate along the * direction characteristically. The elongating direction of the X-ray diffuse streaks significantly differs from that in neutron measurements. The X-ray diffuse distribution can be explained as a result of local charge ordering between Fe2+ and Fe3+. A Huang scattering analysis was applied to determine the double-force tensor which produces partial ordering of Fe2+ and Fe3+ and the local displacement with the pairing ions among the B sites. The horn-like streaks disappeared with X-rays having a lower energy resolution (Fig. 3b, ΔE/E ≃ 10−3), where the energy width is larger than the energy shift between Fe2+ and Fe3+. The diffuse scattering around [110]* is due to thermal diffuse scattering. Thus, the appearance of valence fluctuation assures the validity of the valence-difference contrast method.
point is shown in an iso-diffusion surface (Fig. 3Acknowledgements
We thank Drs H. Kawata, S. Todo and K. Tsukimura for magnetite crystals. This study was performed under the auspices of the Photon Factory (PAC No. 95 G293) and supported by a Grant-in-Aid (07805001) and JSPS-RFTF96P00205.
References
Attfield, J. P. (1990). Nature (London), 343, 46–49. CrossRef CAS Web of Science
Chiba, K., Suzuki, K. & Chikazumi, S. (1975). J. Phys. Soc. Jpn, 39, 839–840. CrossRef CAS Web of Science
Cromer, D. T. & Liberman, D. (1970). J. Chem. Phys. 53, 1891–1898. CrossRef CAS Web of Science
Gao, Y., Frost-Jensen, A., Pressprich, M. R. & Coppens, P. (1992). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 114, 9214–9215. CrossRef CAS Web of Science
Gao, Y., Pressprich, M. R. & Coppens, P. (1993). Acta Cryst. A49, 216–219. CrossRef CAS Web of Science IUCr Journals
Iizumi, M., Koetzle, T. F., Shirane, G., Chikazumi, S., Matsui, M. & Todo, S. (1982). Acta Cryst. B38, 2121–2133. CrossRef CAS Web of Science IUCr Journals
Kwei, G. H., Dreele, R. B., Williams, A., Goldstone, J. A., Lawson A. C. & Warburton, W. K. (1990). J. Mol. Struct. 223, 383–406.
Samuelsen, J., Bleeker, E. J., Dobrzynski, L. & Riste, T. (1968). J. Appl. Phys. 39, 1114–1115. CrossRef CAS Web of Science
Sarode, P. R., Ramasesha, S., Madhusudan, W. H. & Rao, C. N. R. (1979). J. Phys. C, 12, 2439–2445. CrossRef CAS Web of Science
Sasaki, S. (1995). Rev. Sci. Instrum. 66, 1573–1576. CrossRef CAS Web of Science
Shapiro, S. M., Iizumi, M. & Shirane, G. (1976). Phys. Rev. B, 14, 200–207. CrossRef CAS Web of Science
Toyoda, T., Sasaki, S. & Tanaka, M. (1997). Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 36, 2247–2252. CrossRef CAS Web of Science
Verwey, E. J. W., Haayman, P. W. & Romeijn, F. C. (1947). J. Chem. Phys. 15, 181–187. CrossRef CAS Web of Science
Warner, J. K., Cheetham, A. K., Cox, D. E. & Von Dreele, R. B. (1992). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 114, 6074–6080. CrossRef CAS Web of Science
Wilkinson, A. P., Cheetham, A. K. & Cox, D. E. (1991). Acta Cryst. B47, 155–161. CrossRef CAS Web of Science IUCr Journals
Yamada, T., Suzuki, K. & Chikazumi, S. (1968). Appl. Phys. Lett. 13, 172–174. CrossRef CAS Web of Science
Yamada, Y., Mori, M., Noda, Y. & Iizumi, M. (1979). Solid State Commun. 32, 827–830. CrossRef CAS Web of Science
© International Union of Crystallography. Prior permission is not required to reproduce short quotations, tables and figures from this article, provided the original authors and source are cited. For more information, click here.