|
Figure 5
Comparison of depth of field aberration for (a) cylindrical and (b) conical analyser geometry. The acceptance of the Soller slit is 0.4° in both cases. |
|
Figure 5
Comparison of depth of field aberration for (a) cylindrical and (b) conical analyser geometry. The acceptance of the Soller slit is 0.4° in both cases. |