short communications
Inelastic X-ray scattering in molecular liquids and
effectsaResearch Institute for Scientific Measurements, Tohoku University, Katahira 2-1-1, Aoba-Ku, Sendai 980-77, Japan
*Correspondence e-mail: hayashi@rism.tohoku.ac.jp
Inelastic X-ray scattering spectra of liquid water and cyclohexane have been measured with 2 eV resolution for a momentum transfer range between 0.69 and 2.77 au at BL16A of the Photon Factory, KEK, Tsukuba. Observed spectra are transformed to the dynamic
which is normalized by using the Bethe sum rule, and the static is obtained. From a comparison with extended CI calculations by the use of various basis sets, correlation effects are proved to be of vital importance in inelastic X-ray scattering.Keywords: inelastic X-ray scattering; molecular liquids; dynamic structure factor; static structure factor; electron correlations.
1. Introduction
S(q,E) where momentum, q, and energy, E, are transferred (Schulke, 1991),
spectra have been known to be a source of various information on electronic states of matters. The double differential of is expressed by the dynamicHere, (∂σ/∂Ω)Th is the Thomson-scattering S(q,E) is related to the dielectric response function (Schulke, 1991), and hence various properties of materials such as reflectance, mean and so on can be extracted (Inokuti, 1971; Williams et al., 1991). In particular, it is known that the static S(q) derived from S(q,E) is a very correlation-sensitive quantity (Meyer et al., 1995a,b). Although these properties can also be obtained by using EELS, the method has several experimental advantages: it is free from various problems with which EELS is plagued, e.g. multiple scattering, a need of a vacuum, and charge-up phenomena.
So far, ), because of extremely small cross sections of especially at small q. Recent developments of synchrotron radiation sources, however, have made it possible to extend spectroscopy to compounds (Watanabe, Hayashi & Udagawa, 1997). Molecules which consist of a limited number of atoms allow us to use accurate ab initio wave functions to compare theoretical calculations with experimental data. In this study, spectra of water and cyclohexane have been obtained over a momentum transfer range between 0.69 and 2.77 au and compared with Compton profiles. S(q) of water is calculated with various wave functions including effects, and basis set dependency is discussed.
spectra have been reported mainly for elementary solids like Li (Schulke, 19912. Experimental
et al., 1989). The incident X-rays were focused to a liquid jet expanded from a nozzle at the centre of a chamber filled with He gas; no liquid cell was used to avoid scattering from window materials. The scattered X-rays were vertically focused and horizontally dispersed with respect to the by a cylindrically bent Ge(440) crystal having a 550 mm radius of curvature, and detected with a 100 mm long position-sensitive (PSPC), as is schematically shown in Fig. 1. In this configuration the energy resolution is determined by the illuminated sample volume and was ∼2 eV at 7.3 keV from the FWHM of the line. By varying the scattering angle from 20 to 90°, a momentum transfer range 0.69 ≤ q ≤ 2.77 au is covered. The measured spectra were analyzed in a similar manner as described previously (Watanabe, Hayashi & Udagawa, 1997).
measurements were carried out at a multipole wiggler line, BL16A, of the Photon Factory, KEK, Tsukuba (Matsushita3. Results and discussion
3.1. Dynamic S(q,E)
Fig. 2 shows spectra of cyclohexane obtained at scattering angles of 25 and 90° before and after subtraction of the spectra are subsequently transformed to S(q,E), which is shown in Fig. 3, by the use of the Bethe sum rule. Here, S(q,E) is spherically averaged owing to random orientation of molecules in liquids. It has been known that the impulse approximation is valid at large q, and in that case can be analyzed as Compton scattering (Epstein, 1977). Eisenberger & Marra (1971) have experimentally shown that the Compton profiles of individual bonds are transferable among various hydrocarbons and tabulated those for C—H, C—C and C=C. Thus, it is possible to compare the observed S(q,E) with the Compton profiles about C6H12. In Fig. 3, calculated Compton profiles are compared with the observed S(q,E). At the highest q studied here, namely 2.77 au, the two coincide within 1.1 × 10−2 eV−1 except for a shoulder portion at E ≃ 20 eV in the observed S(q,E). This indicates that the impulse approximation holds at q = 2.77 au and also demonstrates the accuracy of the present experiment. With decrease in q, the observed S(q,E) deviates from calculated ones as expected.
3.2. Static S(q)
The static S(q) = ∫S(q,E) dE and is shown in Fig. 4 for water. Since 1 s contributions are out of the range of the present measurement, calculated values according to Thakker & Smith's (1978) formula are added in order to make comparisons with theoretical calculations. Because the core contributions are small over the present q–E range, any error in the estimate of the core contribution is not significant.
can be derived fromIt has already been confirmed that calculations by assuming an independent atom model (IAM), which is conventionally employed in analyzing X-ray diffraction, always overestimates S(q) significantly even though correlated wave functions are used (Watanabe, Hayashi & Udagawa, 1997). Wang et al. (1994) have recently carried out S(q) calculations on a series of ten electron molecules, including H2O, by using double zeta augmented with both polarization and the diffuse functions (DZP++) for molecular HF as well as CI including all single and double excitations (SDCI). Their results are also shown in Fig. 4, which demonstrates that the SDCI calculation shows a significant improvement and that effects are of vital importance in IXS.
We (Watanabe, Hayashi, Udagawa et al., 1997) have also developed a computer code to calculate S(q) at the SDCI level with larger basis functions. Calculations were carried out by the use of triple zeta plus polarization augmented with diffuse and f-polarization functions (TZP++f ). They are also shown in Fig. 4. Although TZP++f gives a slightly smaller S(q) than DZP++ at q > 2 au, the differences are comparable with experimental errors. Thus, the size of basis sets used in this study is concluded to be large enough to predict the intensities of H2O. A further effort to extend the calculation to larger molecules is now in progress.
Acknowledgements
This experiment was carried out at the Photon Factory under proposal No. 95-G331. The authors are grateful to Professor H. Kawata and Dr K. Takeshita who are in charge of BL16A. We also thank Professor S. Iwata and Dr S. Ten-no of the Institute for Molecular Science for their help in the calculation of S(q).
References
Eisenberger, P. & Marra, W. C. (1971). Phys. Rev. Lett. 27, 1413–1416. CrossRef CAS Web of Science
Epstein, I. (1977). Compton Scattering, edited by B. Williams, pp. 209–233. New York: McGraw-Hill International.
Inokuti, M. (1971). Rev. Mod. Phys. 43, 297–347. CrossRef CAS Web of Science
Matsushita, T., Maezawa, H., Ishikawa, T., Nomura, M., Nakagawa, A., Mikuni, A., Muramatsu, Y., Satow, Y., Kosuge, T., Sato, S., Koide, T., Kanaya, N., Asaoka, S. & Nagakura, I. (1989). Rev. Sci. Instrum. 60, 1874–1876. CrossRef CAS Web of Science
Meyer, H., Muller, T. & Schweig, A. (1995a). Chem. Phys. 191, 213–222. CrossRef CAS Web of Science
Meyer, H., Muller, T. & Schweig, A. (1995b). Chem. Phys. Lett. 236, 497–502. CrossRef CAS Web of Science
Schulke, W. (1991). Handbook on Synchrotron Radiation, Vol. 3, edited by G. Brown & D. E. Moncton, pp. 565–637. New York: Elsevier.
Thakker, A. & Smith, V. H. Jr (1978). J. Phys. B, 11, 3803–3820.
Wang, J., Tripathi, A. N. & Smith, V. H. Jr (1994). J. Chem. Phys. 101, 4842–4854. CrossRef CAS Web of Science
Watanabe, N., Hayashi, H. & Udagawa, Y. (1997). Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn, 70, 719–726. CrossRef CAS Web of Science
Watanabe, N., Hayashi, H., Udagawa, Y., Ten-no, S. & Iwata, S. (1997). J. Chem. Phys. In the press..
Williams, M. W., Arakawa, E. T. & Inagaki, T. (1991). Handbook on Synchrotron Radiation, Vol. 4, edited by S. Ebashi, M. Koch & E. Rubenstein, pp. 98–145. New York: Elsevier.
© International Union of Crystallography. Prior permission is not required to reproduce short quotations, tables and figures from this article, provided the original authors and source are cited. For more information, click here.