short communications
A unique high-performance wide-range (10–1500 eV) spherical grating monochromator beamline
aSynchrotron Radiation Research Center, Hsinchu 300, Taiwan
*Correspondence e-mail: tpc@bl11b.srrc.gov.tw
A wide-spectral-range high-performance 6 m-spherical grating monochromator (6 m-SGM) beamline has been designed and is under construction at SRRC. Two different entrance slits, instead of additional mirrors, are used to optimize the overall performance. Six gratings are used to cover photon energies from 10 to 1500 eV. Movable entrance slits and bendable vertical focusing mirrors are used to enhance further the beamline performance. A bendable horizontal focusing mirror is used to improve the resolution and to focus the photon beam at the experimental station immediately after the exit slit. Several end-stations can be installed at the same time to utilize the beam time fully. The expected energy-resolving power, with both slit openings set at 10 µm, is up to 15 000 and 40 000 for the high- and low-energy branches, respectively. A 11 photons s−1 can be obtained with an energy-resolving power of 20 000.
of 1 × 10Keywords: spherical grating monochromator beamline; high-performance spherical grating monochromator; wide range.
1. Introduction
In the past ten years, the development of the VUV and soft X-ray beamlines, covering photon energies from 10 to 2000 eV, has gone through major advances. The newly developed beamlines have achieved their design goals of high resolution and high Among various designs, SX-700 (Petersen, 1982; Jark, 1992; Domke et al., 1992; Kanindl et al., 1992) and Dragon (Chen, 1987; Chen & Sette, 1989; Warwick et al., 1995; Schulz et al., 1996) are the most commonly used. In addition to high resolution, SX-700 and other PGM-type designs have the advantage of covering a wide spectral range per grating. However, the ultra-high precision elliptical pre-focusing mirror needed for SX-700 to achieve high resolution is very difficult to obtain. New PGM-type designs such as those of Koike & Namioka (1994, 1995) utilize variable-spacing plane gratings and require an additional mirror with a sophisticated motion (a coupled translation and rotation) to comply with the grating rotation. This kind of design could degrade the energy resolution because of the figure error of the additional mirror and the complicated energy-scanning mechanism. On the other hand, the Dragon beamline uses only ultra-high-precision spherical (or cylindrical) optical components, which are relatively easy to manufacture. Moreover, only a simple grating rotation mechanism is needed for scanning the energy. In fact, thanks to its simplicity, a as high as 65 000 has recently been achieved by a Dragon-type SGM beamline (Schulz et al., 1996). There are two Dragon-type beamlines, the 6 m-LSGM (Tseng et al., 1995) and the 6 m-HSGM (Chung et al., 1995) beamline, which have been operational at SRRC since 1994. These beamlines have an outstanding performance and offer user-friendly operation. However, there is still a strong demand for a high-performance beamline which can cover photon energies in the range 10–1500 eV. In order to fulfill the goal of obtaining a wide spectral range without sacrificing the high performance of the SGM design, we have come up with a design that utilizes two different entrance slits to achieve different grating included angles, instead of adding mirrors between the entrance and exit slits. In this design, there is only one reflection optics component, i.e. the grating, between the slits. Furthermore, we have added several special features to the original Dragon design to enhance the performance greatly.
2. Beamline optical system
The optical layout of the wide-range 6 m-SGM beamline is shown in Fig. 1 and the parameters of the optical components are listed in Table 1. Similar to other Dragon-type designs, a 6 m-SGM is arranged between pre-focusing and post-focusing mirrors. Two separate entrance slits are utilized to achieve two different grating included angles. We have also utilized several special features, such as a bendable modified plane–elliptical horizontal focusing mirror (HFM), bendable vertical focusing mirrors (VFM) and movable entrance slits, to enhance further the performance.
|
The HFM, which is located 5.5 m from the source, collects 11 mrad of the horizontal radiation fan from the source. Since this mirror will receive a thermal loading of 100 W, the HFM is internally water cooled. The HFM is a specially designed plane–ellipse. The shape of the ellipse is calculated directly from the geometric arrangement of the optical system and the actual arc shape of the bending-magnet source (Chen, 1997). The modified plane–elliptical surface can eliminate the aberration effect caused by the source, and hence provide a much better focused spot. The modified plane–ellipse is now commercially available. The HFM is made bendable so that the photon beam can be focused horizontally onto the exit slit or at the sample position. The horizontal size of the photon beam at the exit slit or at the sample position is about 1 mm. The experimental station immediately after the exit slit is very suitable for experiments that require high especially in the high-energy region.
Two cylindrical VFMs, one for the low-energy branch and the other for the high-energy branch, are employed to provide two different optical paths. Both VFMs are bendable and their radii can be continuously varied, so that the photon beams can always be focused vertically onto the movable entrance slits. The entrance slits are made movable as this allows eliminatination of the coma aberration of the grating. The photon beam of the low-energy branch is focused vertically and deflected upwards by VFML and then reflected downwards by a plane mirror. This arrangement gives a smaller grating included angle and provides enough space to accommodate both entrance slits. With the help of the SHADOW ray-tracing programs (Lai & Cerrina, 1986), a demagnification factor of about 1.5 is decided upon for the VFM to minimize the focused spot size at the entrance slit.
Included angles of 174 and 160° are chosen for the high- and low-energy branches, respectively. Six spherical gratings are used to cover photon energies from 10 to 1500 eV. Gratings with ruling densities of 300, 600 and 1200 lines mm−1 are used to cover the low-energy branch from 10 to 150 eV, and gratings with ruling densities of 400, 800 and 1600 lines mm−1 are used to cover the high-energy branch from 130 to 1500 eV. A laminar ruling profile is used for each grating to reduce the amount of high-order scattered light. A common movable exit slit is used for the entire energy range. A single toroidal re-focusing mirror (RFM) is used to focus the beams onto the sample. One plane mirror and another RFM can be inserted later for the third experimental station. The final focused image at the last sample position is smaller than 0.7 × 0.3 mm.
3. Estimated performance
Following the Dragon beamline design criteria (Chen, 1987), the performance of the wide-range 6 m-SGM is optimized. Incident angles of 80 and 87° are chosen for the low- and high-energy ranges, respectively, and the sum of the entrance and exit arms of the monochromator is set at 6 m to maximize the energy resolution and photon throughput. In order to increase the resolution limits, spherical gratings are used to minimize the astigmatic coma term (C12) and astigmatic term (C02), and a movable exit slit is used to eliminate the defocus term (C20). Spherical gratings rather than the cylindrical gratings are used here because spherical gratings are slightly easier to manufacture. If the entrance slit is kept fixed, the coma (C30) aberration may limit the ultimate resolution of the momochromator. The energy-resolving power of the 6 m-SGM with a fixed entrance is shown by the dashed curves in Fig. 2. The of each grating has a maximum in the middle and falls off on both sides, due to the coma term. The energy-resolving power can be improved further by eliminating the C30 term. By moving both the entrance and exit slits to satisfy Rowland-circle focusing conditions (Samson, 1967), i.e. r1 = R cos α and r2 = R cos β, both the C20 and C30 terms can be eliminated at the same time. Fig. 2 displays the resolving powers under this condition, showing a maximum value of 40 000. In these calculations, the figure slope error of the grating is taken to be ±0.1 arcsec and both slits are set at 10 µm.
With the help of the SHADOW ray-tracing programs (Lai & Cerrina, 1986), the calcuated photon fluxes for different gratings and slit openings are shown in Fig. 3. In these calculations, the reflectance of all the optical surfaces, mirrors and gratings, are calculated using the Fresnel equations and the tabulated refraction coefficients, n and k (Mahan, 1956; Windt et al., 1988). With a storage-ring current of 200 mA, a of 1 × 1011 photons s−1 is expected for an energy-resolving power of 20 000.
4. Summary
A high-performance wide-range 6 m-SGM beamline which covers photon energies from 10 to 1500 eV has been designed and is under construction at SRRC. Based on the 6 m-SGM design, several special features, such as specially designed bendable horizontal focusing mirrors, movable entrance slits, a bendable vertical focusing mirror and a movable exit slit, have been adopted to enhance the beamline performance greatly. Two or more end-stations can be installed in the beamline at the same time, allowing the beam time to be utilized fully. The expected 11 photons s−1 for an energy-resolving power of 20 000. The size of the focused spot at the sample location is less than 0.7 × 0.3 mm2. The beamline will be ready for commissioning in the spring of 1998.
is greater than 1 × 10Acknowledgements
We would like to thank the SRRC staff, especially the beamline group, for useful discussions.
References
Chen, C. T. (1987). Nucl. Instrum. Methods A, 256, 595–604. CrossRef Web of Science
Chen, C. T. & Sette, F. (1989). Rev. Sci. Instrum. 60, 1616–1621. CrossRef CAS Web of Science
Chen, C. T. (1997). In preparation.
Chung, S.-C., Chen, C.-I., Tseng, P.-C., Lin, H.-F., Dann, T.-E., Song, Y.-F., Hsieh, T.-F., Tsang, K.-L. & Chang, C.-N. (1995). Rev. Sci. Instrum. 66, 1655–1657. CrossRef CAS Web of Science
Domke, M., Mandel, T., Puschman, A., Xue, C., Shirley, D. A. & Kanindl, G. (1992). Rev. Sci. Instrum. 63, 80–89. CrossRef CAS Web of Science
Jark, W. (1992). Rev. Sci. Instrum. 63, 1241–1246. CrossRef Web of Science
Kanindl, G., Domke, M., Lambschat, C., Weschke, E. & Xue, C. (1992). Rev. Sci. Instrum. 63, 1234–1240.
Koike, M. & Namioka, T. (1994). Appl. Opt. 33, 2048–2056. CrossRef CAS PubMed
Koike, M. & Namioka, T. (1995). Rev. Sci. Instrum. 66, 2144–2146. CrossRef CAS Web of Science
Lai, B. & Cerrina, F. (1986). Nucl. Instrum. Methods A, 246, 337–341. CrossRef Web of Science
Mahan, A. I. (1956). J. Opt. Soc. Am. 46, 913–926. CrossRef Web of Science
Petersen, H. (1982). Opt. Commun. 40, 402–406. CrossRef Web of Science
Samson, J. A. (1967). Techniques of VUV Spectroscopy, pp. 43–84. Nebraska, USA.
Schulz, K., Kanindl, G., Domke, M., Bozek, J. D., Heimann, P.A., Schlachter, A. S. & Rost, J. M. (1996). Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3086–3089. CrossRef PubMed CAS Web of Science
Tseng, P.-C., Lin, H.-J., Chung, S.-C., Chen, C.-I., Lin, H.-F., Dann, T.-E., Song, Y.-F., Hsieh, T.-F., Tsang, K.-L. & Chang, C.-N. (1995). Rev. Sci. Instrum. 66, 1658–1660. CrossRef CAS Web of Science
Warwick, T., Heimann, P., Mossessian, D., McKinney, W. & Padmore, H. (1995). Rev. Sci. Instrum. 66, 2037–2040. CrossRef CAS Web of Science
Windt, D. L., Cash, W. C., Scoot, M., Arendt, P., Newnam, B., Fisfer, R. F., Swartzlander, S., Takacs, P. Z. & Pinneo, J. M. (1988). Appl. Opt. 27, 279–295. CrossRef CAS PubMed
© International Union of Crystallography. Prior permission is not required to reproduce short quotations, tables and figures from this article, provided the original authors and source are cited. For more information, click here.