short communications
A plane-grating monochromator beamline for the PTB undulators at BESSY II
aBESSY GmbH, Lentzeallee 100, 14195 Berlin, Germany, and bPhysikalisch–Technische Bundesanstalt, Abbestrasse 2-12, 10587 Berlin, Germany
*Correspondence e-mail: senf@exp.bessy.de
At the BESSY II storage ring, the Physikalisch–Technische Bundesanstalt (PTB) will operate insertion devices dedicated to radiometric use. One branch of the appendant beamline system will be equipped with a grazing-incidence monochromator, described here. The monochromator concept is based on a plane grating operated in parallel light; therefore exact focusing is maintained for all photon energies irrespective of the angular setting at the grating. The monochromator has been optimized for small higher-order transmittance and high power throughput, as required by radiometric applications in the wide photon energy range from 20 eV to 1900 eV.
Keywords: radiometry; spectral purity; monochromators.
1. Introduction
The Physikalisch–Technische Bundesanstalt (PTB) will operate its own insertion devices in a straight section of the 1.7 GeV electron storage ring BESSY II. In cooperation between PTB and BESSY, three beamline branches have been designed for the radiometric use of undulator radiation: one for experiments using direct undulator radiation, another equipped with a normal-incidence monochromator and a third with a grazing-incidence monochromator.
For radiometric applications, such as detector calibration with a cryogenic radiometer (Rabus et al., 1997) as primary detector standard, high spectral purity (less than 0.5% of the due to stray light from all beamline elements and due to higher orders) and high (P > 10 µW at 100 mA stored electron current at modest resolution) are required (Ulm & Wende, 1995). Hence, the design targets are slightly different from those for other undulator beamlines at BESSY II, where highest energy resolution and are the centres of interest.
In the following, the details and the performance of the grazing-incidence beamline are discussed.
2. Description of the beamline
2.1. Source
The beamline will be alternately operated with a U180 (180 mm period) (Klein et al., 1998) and a U49 (49 mm period) (Bahrdt et al., 1996) undulator to cover a wide photon energy range from 20 eV to 1900 eV with maximum performance, i.e. high and small transmittance of higher diffraction orders.
An undulator spectrum consists of discrete harmonics of a fundamental energy with different angular distributions. The radiation in the central cone of the first, third and fifth harmonics is used as input for the monochromator. The corresponding e.g. the sixth and ninth harmonics of the undulator if the third harmonic is used. In most cases, it is sufficient to consider higher-order radiation up to the third diffraction order. A special case is the third harmonic of the undulator. In the lower energy range, it produces higher-order light in the third diffraction order, whereas in the medium energy range, it has to be used as the radiation source itself.
output at harmonics with double and triple photon energy must also be considered, since they produce unwanted light in the second and third diffraction orders at the grating,2.2. Monochromator
The design of our choice is an SX-700 type (Petersen, 1982) of plane-grating monochromator (PGM), working with parallel light on the grating. For a plane grating, the focusing condition is given by
where r′ is the virtual monochromatic image distance and r is the real source distance. α and β are the angles of incidence and diffraction with respect to the grating normal, respectively. In the usual SX-700 design, the cff value has to be a constant to fulfil the focusing condition for all photon energies E. In contrast, for collimated light, r and r′ become infinity and exact focusing can be maintained independently of cff and E. Thus, the monochromator can be alternatively operated at different cff values or deviation angles and optimized for higher-order suppression, highest or highest energy resolution.
The optical layout of the whole beamline is shown in Fig. 1. The first optical element, 18 m downstream of the middle of the insertion device, is a horizontally deflecting water-cooled toroidal mirror (M1). The mirror focuses the source to infinity and forms collimated light in both the vertical and horizontal directions. By means of precision drives, the mirror can be completely removed from the undulator beam, thus allowing experiments with direct undulator radiation to be carried out.
The plane-grating/plane-mirror assembly, equipped with two gratings (1200 and 300 lines mm−1) and a long rotatable plane mirror, is located 7 m downstream of M1. The rotation angles of both optical elements are measured by precision angle encoders, mounted directly on the rotation axes inside the vacuum chamber. The gratings as well as the plane mirror can be translated transverse to the optical axis. As a result, at different photon energies different coatings of the optics can be used for optimum higher-order suppression. Half the plane mirror and the 300 lines mm−1 grating surface is SiC-coated while the other half is coated with Au. All other optical elements are Au-coated.
A horizontally deflecting cylindrical mirror (M3) focuses the diffracted light vertically onto the exit slit. The toroidal mirror (M4) is applied for refocusing the beam in both the vertical and horizontal directions, onto the sample position. The spot size depends on photon energy and slit width. At 400 eV and a slit width of 200 µm the diameter is about 200 µm FWHM.
3. Minimizing higher-order radiation
The most effective way to obtain high i.e. coating, groove profile, line density and the total deviation angle, . For this purpose, a code developed for calculating diffraction efficiencies (Neviere et al., 1982) was implemented in the OPTIMO optimization program. OPTIMO is based on principles of evolution strategy and is a repetitive optimization code originally developed to minimize optical aberrations at monochromators for highest energy resolution (Eggenstein et al., 1990).
and, at the same time, small transmittance of higher diffraction orders is to optimize the grating parameters,The i.e. the spectral reflectance of the fixed optical elements, was used as the input for the optimization calculations. The optimization goal was to keep the ratio of the in higher diffraction orders to the below 0.5%, while maximizing the in the first order.
output of the undulator combined with the filter characteristic,After the grating parameters were specified, the cff value and the corresponding deviation angle were further optimized. In addition, the line density and the coating were selected for best performance in the energy range of the source harmonic. Fig. 2shows the cff values and the corresponding deviation angles for U180 and U49, optimized for higher-order suppression with maximum in the first order. For this optimization target, a trend towards an increasing cff value and deviation angle can be seen. However, there are several exceptions, especially near the absorption edges of the coating material. At low energies, the optimization is limited by the angular scan range of the plane mirror and grating.
4. output
Figs. 3 and 4 show the spectral power distribution at the end of the undulator beamline system when operated in the higher-order suppression mode. The output in the first diffraction order as well as in the corresponding higher orders is displayed. Each subdivision of Figs. 3 and 4 represents a special combination of undulator harmonic and grating line number and coating while the grating is operated at the optimized cff values, as shown in Fig. 2.
The
output of the beamline well surpasses the minimum requirement of 10 µW in the energy range up to 600 eV for the U180 undulator and up to 1900 eV for the U49 undulator. In the energy range 140–600 eV, about one order of magnitude in can be gained when U49 is used. 140 eV is the lower limit of the first harmonic of U49, at 1.7 GeV electron energy.The other design target of higher-order radiation less than 0.5% can be achieved for photon energies higher than 50 eV. The range can be extended to photon energies down to 30 eV by inserting a thin aluminium filter. Nevertheless, the photon energy range below 30 eV will need to be covered by a normal-incidence monochromator designed for the third branch of the beamline system.
References
Bahrdt, J., Gaupp, A., Ingold, G. & Scheer, M. (1996). Proceedings of the 5th European Particle Accelerator Conference, Vol. 3, pp. 2535–2537. Bristol: Institute of Physics.
Eggenstein, F., Peatman, W. & Senf, F. (1990). BESSY Annual Report, pp. 421–424. BESSY GmbH, Berlin, Germany.
Klein, R., Bahrdt, J., Herzog, D. & Ulm, G. (1998). J. Synchrotron Rad. 5, 451–452 Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals
Neviere, M., Flamand, J. & Lerner, J. M. (1982). Nucl. Instrum. Methods, 195, 183–189. CrossRef CAS Web of Science
Petersen, H. (1982). Opt. Commun. 40, 402–406. CrossRef Web of Science
Rabus, H., Persch, V. & Ulm, G. (1997). Appl. Opt. 36, 5421–5440. CrossRef PubMed CAS Web of Science
Ulm, G. & Wende, B. (1995). Rev. Sci. Instrum. 66, 2244–2247. CrossRef CAS Web of Science
© International Union of Crystallography. Prior permission is not required to reproduce short quotations, tables and figures from this article, provided the original authors and source are cited. For more information, click here.