short communications
Development of a two-dimensional imaging system for clinical applications of intravenous coronary angiography using intense synchrotron radiation produced by a multipole wiggler
aInstitute of Material Structure Sciences, High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), 1-1 Oho, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305, Japan, bGraduated School for Advanced Sciences, 1-1 Oho, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305, Japan, cInstitute of Clinical Medicine, The University of Tsukuba, 1-1 Ten-nodai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305, Japan, and dInstitute of Basic Medical Sciences, The University of Tsukuba, 1-1 Ten-nodai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305, Japan
*Correspondence e-mail: hyodo@kekvax.kek.jp
A two-dimensional clinical intravenous coronary angiography system, comprising a large-size view area produced by asymmetrical reflection from a silicon crystal using intense synchrotron radiation from a multipole wiggler and a two-dimensional detector with an image intensifier, has been completed. An advantage of the imaging system is that two-dimensional dynamic imaging of the cardiovascular system can be achieved due to its two-dimensional radiation field. This world-first two-dimensional system has been successfully adapted to clinical applications. Details of the imaging system are described in this paper.
Keywords: coronary angiography; two-dimensional imaging systems; asymmetrical reflections; multipole wigglers; clinical applications.
1. Introduction
The clinical application of monochromatic X-rays from synchrotron radiation, particularly in the diagnosis of the coronary arteries, has been proposed by Rubenstein et al. (1981).
The development of a one-dimensional scanning system was first initiated at SSRL (Huges et al., 1983; Thompson et al., 1989) and further developed at NSLS (Thomlinson et al., 1988, 1992), HASYLAB (Dix et al., 1992; Dix, 1995), VEPP IV (Dementyev et al., 1989) and ESRF (Moulin et al., 1993). Rubenstein et al. (1987) succeeded in a clinical application of the one-dimensional scanning system for the first time in 1986. Since then, many clinical applications of a one-dimensional scanning system have been established at SSRL, NSLS and DESY.
In Japan, medical doctors have claimed that any system to be developed should be very similar to those that have been and are in daily use at hospitals, meaning that one should be able to observe blood flow in a two-dimensional view area to evaluate the heart motion as well as the morphological information on coronary arteries. In order to obtain an image of the whole heart, however, the small vertical size of the synchrotron radiation beam itself must be magnified by some means. Some of the present authors initiated the development of a two-dimensional dynamic imaging system in 1984 (Akisada et al., 1987; Hyodo et al., 1991). Our system, which is principally based on vertical magnification of the beam by means of asymmetrical reflection from a crystal and visualization by means of an image-intensifier–TV (II–TV) system, has an advantage of producing dynamic two-dimensional images, as does conventional coronary angiography. Since the initial development, the authors have confirmed by animal experiments at ARNE5 (Hyodo et al., 1991, 1994) that the system, which uses a synchrotron radiation beam generated by a bending magnet in the accumulation ring (AR), has potential applications to clinical settings. In particular, the authors have proved that distinction of the coronary artery system can be satisfactorily achieved on dynamic images with monochromatic radiation of the upper K-edge, even without performing subtraction between two radiograms taken with X-ray radiation at each upper and lower K-edge of iodine. According to this procedure, using a two-dimensional imaging system, the X-ray exposure dose to a patient is expected to be reduced by a factor of two compared with that of a subtraction procedure.
Practical clinical applications have necessitated further development and preparation of some equipment.
The development of a two-dimensional imaging system for human examination is described in this article.
2. Instrumental development
2.1. Intense synchrotron radiation source
It has been revealed that the number of photons in the X-ray radiation generated by a bending magnet at the AR is not sufficient to apply this to clinical settings. A multipole wiggler (MPW) for generating circularly polarized synchrotron radiation was installed in the AR for studying magnetic materials at beamline ARNE1 in 1988 (Yamamoto et al., 1989). It also generates dual intense linearly polarized radiation. Consequently, some of the present authors proposed a medical diagnostic system in which MPW-generated linearly polarized radiation is selected, and have been trying to verify its performance using phantoms with a field size of 70 mm × 70 mm (Hyodo et al., 1992, 1994). The intensity of 33 keV of the linearly polarized radiation is approximately 10–20 times as high as that of the bending-magnet radiation, realizing our expectation to obtain monochromatic X-ray radiation with sufficiently high intensity for clinical applications.
2.2. Beamline technology
Fig. 1 shows a side view of a vertical section of the system using synchrotron radiation produced by the MPW at ARNE1. The X-ray shutter system for this beamline originally comprised two shutters for radiation safety, i.e. a proximally positioned MBS (main beam shutter) and a distally positioned BBS (branch beam shutter) (Kawata et al., 1989). The BBS is operated by the medical doctors in clinical examinations as an X-ray shutter. Furthermore, in our system, an additional high-speed X-ray shutter to decrease the radiation dose received by a patient was positioned immediately in front of the Si monochromator crystal. The crystal was positioned at a distance of 40 m from the source point in order to convert the synchrotron radiation into monochromatic X-rays, and, simultaneously, to magnify the vertical size of the monochromatic X-rays. The dimensions of the white X-ray radiation are 8 mm vertically by 80 mm horizontally at the point; this is a characteristic feature of the MPW beamline (NE1). The thus-generated monochromatic radiation is led to a newly equipped special station for patients. It is emitted in a direction 13° upwards due to Bragg reflection of 33 keV by the Si(311) plane, and then visualized with an II–TV system, a two-dimensional detector, after passing through the patient's body from the back. An accelerator is operated at an acceleration energy of 5.0 GeV for clinical applications, unlike that of 6.5 GeV for the usual synchrotron radiation experiments (the reason is explained later). The characteristics of the imaging system are summarized in Table 1. A detailed description of each item is given below.
|
2.2.1. Monochromator system
For imaging the heart, it is necessary to magnify the vertical beam size. The magnification ratio, m, of the beam size is given by
where θB is the and α is the angle between the diffracting planes and the crystal surface.
The desired length of the crystal, L, is given by
where W is the width of the incoming beam.
A crystal with a diffraction plane of (311) and an α value from equation (1) of 5.8° was selected for our system. With a crystal having these characteristics, the for 33 keV is 6.5° and the incident angle of the synchrotron radiation beam to the crystal is thus approximately 0.7°. The size of the crystal plate is 655 mm (length) by 80 mm (width) by 10 mm (thickness). Furthermore, the surface of the crystal was ground with No. 1200 mesh silicon carbide in an attempt to achieve as large an integral intensity as possible. By this procedure it could be expected to achieve an integral intensity of the monochromatic X-ray radiation of 33 keV, approximately eight times as large as that obtained with crystals treated by a conventional etching procedure (Akisada et al., 1987). A silicon plate was placed on a copper plate which was located on a goniometer (KOHZE KTG-200) and equipped with a pipe for water cooling.
2.2.2. High-speed X-ray shutter and high-speed-driven filter
For the purpose of reducing the X-ray exposure dose to patients as much as possible, a high-speed X-ray shutter and a high-speed-driven aluminium filter were placed before the crystal. The high-speed X-ray shutter chosen is of the stainless-steel rotating-drum type, having an aperture for the transmission of the radiation beam; three kinds of apertures corresponding to 2, 4, 6 ms were prepared (Oku et al., 1998). By employing this type of high-speed X-ray shutter, the generation of pulse-like radiation at a rate of 30 s−1 or 15 s−1 is feasible.
A high-speed-driven aluminium filter was installed in an attempt to reduce the X-ray exposure dose to patients, e.g. at the time of setting the position of a patient, the intensity of 33 keV monochromatic X-ray radiation could be modulated within a range of 1/1–1/1000 by changing the thickness of the aluminium filter within a range 0–30 mm. This filter is driven by an electromagnetic motor, and, thus, ON/OFF switching of the filter at a speed of 20 ms is feasible. The aluminium filter receiving radiation from the incident X-rays was packed in a copper holder equipped with a pipe for water cooling..
2.2.3. Clinical hutch
The distance between the front of the new hutch and the crystal is approximately 4 m, and the monochromatic X-ray radiation is transmitted to the hutch through a pipe surrounded by a 2 mm-thick lead sheet in a direction 13° upwards from the crystal. At the entrance of the hutch, a calibrated 20 ml . The arrangement of a circular X-ray exposure-dose counter on the left-hand side, a special chair for the patient and a two-dimensional X-ray imaging system (II–TV) on the right-hand side can be seen.
of the free-air type (Applied Engineering Inc. C-178) was arranged for measuring the X-ray exposure dose to patients. The hutch has three entrances, each for the patients, doctors and experimental equipment. Inside the hutch a vertically and horizontally driven chair for the patients, which is controllable from outside of the hutch, a small X-ray generator (TOSHIBA SXT-650A) for use during the insertion of catheters into the veins, a bed for the patient, an auto-injector (Nemoto Kyorindo M800) for contrast media, and two TV cameras (SONY XC-77) for monitoring the patient, were arranged. The projection angle for a patient is set by rotating the chair by manual operation. The wall and floor of the hutch were covered with 6 mm lead sheets for shielding scattered X-rays. An audio system (Victor PA-604, XL-M61) was introduced to allow conversation between the patient and doctors across the hutch; furthermore, music flow was made available to maintain the patient's tranquil psychologically during the procedure. An inside view of the hutch is presented in Fig. 22.2.4. Special interlock system for clinical use
The hutch has a special interlock system, which is not usually installed for use in synchrotron radiation experiments for the following reasons. (a) A special console linked to the beam shutter, BBS, has been installed for use only by medical doctors. (b) The beam shutter is in an open status in the condition that all doors are closed; in an emergency, the beam shutter is closed when any one of the doors is opened. Thus, the operation of an emergency opening of either one of the doors for the patient and for the doctor is feasible without the use of an interlock key, which are used in synchrotron radiation experiments. During the imaging procedure, the doctor can monitor the patient's condition either through a lead-glass window of the hutch or on TV monitors. (c) The beam shutter is automatically closed when the skin dose to a patient exceeds the upper limit set by the medical doctor.
2.2.5. Detector and data-processing system
For the present two-dimensional imaging system, an II–TV system of the conventional type (TOSHIBA RTP9211G-10) for clinical applications is employed. The spatial resolution of the detector system is about 150 µm. Image signals from a TV can be processed in various ways using image processors (TOSHIBA DFP-2000A) after A/D conversion at 1024 × 1024 × 10 bits. The image transmission is 30 images s−1.
3. Phantom experiment
Imaging of a vessel phantom was performed using the system described in §2. The phantom was prepared by cutting holes of 1, 2, 5 and 8 mm diameter in an acrylic plate, and by sealing a contrast medium of 5% concentration by weight, which corresponds to the concentration of the contrast medium in the heart after being infused through the artery in the case of intravenous injection, in each hole. Imaging of the vessel phantom with a bone phantom was performed on piled acrylic plates having a total thickness of 200 mm for the purpose of simulating the size of the human body. The conditions of the AR during the procedure were 5.0 GeV for the energy of acceleration and 28 mA for the stored current. The rate of radiation was 4 ms image−1. These conditions resulted in a phantom-incoming radiation dose of approximately 1 mGy image−1.
Fig. 3 shows the result of a phantom experiment. The image was taken above the K-edge of iodine (33.17 keV + 160 eV). The vertical size, having a view area of 140 mm or above, was large enough to see a heart. Its uniformity, as measured by the contrast difference between the centre and edge, was within 25% vertically and 3% horizontally. The front face of the image intensifier was placed 500 mm distant from the patient position in an attempt to reduce the incoming scattered beams generated by the patient into the imaging system. In other words, precaution was taken not to lose the of the imaging system caused by the longer distance between the patient and the image intensifier, which most likely takes place when a surface grinding-processed monochromator crystal is used. The spatial resolution of the II–TV system measured by an MTF chart, which was set at the patient position, was 200 µm.
4. Discussion
The usefulness of the clinical settings was confirmed by the trial imaging on phantoms. In clinical applications the AR must be operated at 5.0 GeV in order to minimize contamination by the third higher harmonics (99 keV); thus, the . Imaging will be performed while keeping the aluminium filter inserted until the contrast media has reached the desired region in the case of synchrotron radiation angiography.
of the synchrotron from the MPW in the ring for this purpose is 17 keV. Furthermore, contamination by the third higher harmonics could be reduced relatively by modulating the gap (minimum gap 30 mm) and hence the intensity of the magnetic field (1.0 T at minimum gap) of the MPW. The estimated skin doses received by a patient per injection for synchrotron radiation angiography and conventional digital subtraction angiography (DSA) are given in Table 2
|
The first human examinations of intravenous coronary angiography using the two-dimensional imaging system were performed at the AR on 23 and 29 May 1996. Four patients (from 60 to 75 years old) were examined using the system. The AR was operated at 5.0 GeV and the average stored current was about 20 mA. Images were taken above the K-edge energy (33.34 or 37 keV). Three or four injections were performed for each patient to detect left and right coronary arteries at LAO (left anterior position) and RAO (right anterior position). Images were recorded in about 5 s at a rate of 30 images s−1. The exposure time for each image was 4 ms. The maximum surface dose onto a patient was limited to up to 1 Gy for each patient by medical doctors. The photon intensity in front of a patient was approximately 5 × 1010 photons mm−2 s−1. Contrast material, total amount 40 ml, was injected into the carotid vein or arm vein for each examination. The advantage of the two-dimensional imaging system for coronary angiography was confirmed by the examinations. Furthermore, the possibility of quantitative diagnostic imaging has been substantiated, because quantification of the coronary artery blood flow could be accomplished on dynamic images. The details concerning the patient examinations will be reported (Ohtsuka et al., 1998).
Footnotes
‡Present address: Japan Synchrotron Radiation Research Institute (JASRI), Kamigori, Ako-gun, Hyogo 678-12, Japan.
Acknowledgements
The construction of the clinical imaging system described in this article was performed under a collaboration between KEK and the University of Tsukuba. We are very grateful to H. Koga, ATC Inc., for his help in building the system. We would like to express our thanks to TOSHIBA Co. for their great support for allowing the present authors to use the digital image-processing system. We are grateful to H. Inoue, TOSHIBA Medical Co., for his great help in operating the digital image-processing system and many suggestions. We would like to express our thanks to K. Kondo, H. Hirayana and Y. Namito, KEK, for their kind help in clearing radiation safety procedure and to K. Ito, T. Kosuge, Y. Saito and S. Takeda, KEK, for their kind help in constructing the special interlock system. The present work has been successfully proceeding under a special operation of the AR by the full support of the Tristan accelerator group to whom the authors would like to express their special thanks, especially to H. Fukuma, T. Yoshioka, K. Kanazawa and Y. Suetsugu. The authors would also like to express their thanks to the Photon Factory staff, such as H. Kawata, T. Iwazumi, T. Miyahara, Y. Kagoshima, X. Zhang, H. Sugiyama and T. Kikegawa, who are in charge of each synchrotron radiation station at the AR.
References
Akisada, M., Ando, M., Hyodo, K., Hasegawa, S., Konishi, K., Nishimura, K., Maruhashi, A., Toyofuku, F., Suwa, A. & Khora, K. (1987). Nucl. Instrum. Methods, 246, 713–717. CrossRef Web of Science
Dementyev, E. N., Dolbnya, I. P., Zagorodnikov, E. I., Kolesnikov, K. A., Kulipanov, G. N., Kurylo, G., Medvedko, A. S., Mezentsev, N. A., Pindyurin, V. F., Cheskidov, V. & Sheromov, M. A. (1989). Rev. Sci. Instrum. 60, 2264–2268.
Dix, W.-R. (1995). Prog. Biophys. Mol. Biol. 63, 159–191. CrossRef CAS PubMed Web of Science
Dix, W.-R., Engelke, K., Graeff, W., Hamm, C., Heuer, J., Kaempf, B., Kupper, W., Lohmann, M., Reime, B. & Reumann, R. (1992). Nucl. Instrum. Methods, A314, 307–311. CrossRef CAS Web of Science
Huges, E. B., Zeman, H. D., Campbell, L. E., Hofstadter, R., Meyer-Berkhout, U., Otis, J. N., Rolfe, J., Stone, J. P., Wilson, S., Rubenstein, E., Harrison, D. C., Kernoff, R. S., Thompson, A. C. & Brown, G. S. (1983). Nucl. Instrum. Methods, 208, 665–668.
Hyodo, K., Nishimura, K. & Ando, M. (1991). Handbook on Synchrotron Radiation, Vol. 4, edited by S. Ebashi, M. Koch & E. Rubenstein, pp. 55–94. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Hyodo, K., Shiwaku, H., Yamamoto, S., Kitamura, H. & Ando, M. (1992). Rev. Sci. Instrum. 63, 601. CrossRef
Hyodo, K., Shiwaku, H., Yamamoto, S., Kitamura, H. & Ando, M. (1994). Synchrotron Radiation in the Biosciences, edited by B. Chance, J. Deisenhofer & S. Ebashi, pp. 557–565. Oxford University Press.
Kawata, H., Miyahara, T., Yamamoto, S., Shioya, T., Kitamura, H., Sato, S., Asaoka, S., Kanaya, N., Iida, A., Mikuni, A., Sato, M., Iwazumi, T., Kitajima, Y. & Ando, M. (1989). Rev. Sci. Instrum. 60, 1885–1888. CrossRef CAS Web of Science
Moulin, H., Suorti, P. & Schulze, C. (1993). Phys. Med. 9, 2–3.
Ohtsuka, S., Sugishita, Y., Takeda, T., Itai, Y., Tada, J., Hyodo, K. & Ando, M. (1998). In preparation.
Oku, Y., Hyodo, K., Ando, M. & Tada, J. (1998). J. Synchrotron Rad. 5, 123–127. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals
Rubenstein, E., Hofstadter, R., Zeman, H. D., Thompson, A. C., Otis, J. N., Brown, G. S., Giacomini, J. C., Gordon, H. J., Kernoff, R. S., Harrison, D. C. & Thomlinson, W. (1987). Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 83, 9724–9728. CrossRef Web of Science
Rubenstein, E., Hughes, E. B., Campbell, L. E., Hofstadter, R., Kirk, J. T. O., Krolicki, T. J., Stone, J. P., Wilson, K. S., Zeman, H. D., Brody, W. R., Macovski, A. & Thompson, A. C. (1981). SPIE, 314, 42–44.
Thomlinson, W., Chapman, D., Gmur, N. & Lazarz, N. (1988). Nucl. Instrum. Methods, A266, 226–230. CrossRef CAS Web of Science
Thomlinson, W., Gmur, N., Chapman, D., Garett, R., Lazarz, N., Zeman, H. D., Brown, G. S., Morrison, J., Reiser, P., Padmanabhan, V., Ong, L., Green, S., Giacomoni, J., Goedon, H. & Rubenstein, E. (1992). Rev. Sci. Instrum. 63, 625–629. CrossRef Web of Science
Thompson, A. C., Rubenstein, E., Zeman, H. D., Hofstadter, R., Otis, J. N., Giacomini, J. C., Gordon, H. J., Brown, G. S., Thomlinson, W. & Kernoff, R. S. (1989). Rev. Sci. Instrum. 60, 1674–1678. CrossRef CAS Web of Science
Yamamoto, S., Kawata, H., Kitamura, H., Ando, M., Sakai, N. & Shiotani, N. (1989). Phys. Rev. Lett. 62(23), 2672–2674. CrossRef Web of Science
© International Union of Crystallography. Prior permission is not required to reproduce short quotations, tables and figures from this article, provided the original authors and source are cited. For more information, click here.