plenary papers
The role of in situ and ex situ elucidation of active sites in designed solid catalysts
in theaDavy Faraday Research Laboratory, The Royal Institution of GB, 21 Albemarle Street, London W1S 4BS, England
*Correspondence e-mail: jmt@ri.ac.uk
New mesoporous and microporous catalysts based on silica, aluminophosphates, or aluminophosphates containing one or other of the heteroatoms Ti, Co, Mn, Fe and Cr, are ideally suited for study by X-ray absorption fine structure (XAFS). The information derived from X-ray absorption near-edge structure (XANES) and extended X-ray absorption fine structure (EXAFS) elucidates the nature of the catalytically active site, generally (but not invariably) under in situ conditions. This, in turn, provides new insights into the mechanism of the catalysis and suggests methods of improving the performance of the original catalyst. In this way, significant advances have recently been made in designing catalysts for the selective oxidation of for the epoxidation of and for the dehydration of to yield Combined with density functional theory (DFT) computations, studies have also yielded fresh insights into the architecture of nanoparticle catalysts, such as Ru12Cu4C2 supported on mesoporous silica.
Keywords: catalysts; mesoporous; microporous; silica; aluminophosphates.
1. Introduction
We are concerned here with high-area microporous or mesoporous solids consisting of silica, aluminophosphates or aluminosilicates in which the locus of catalytic conversion, the so-called active site, has been introduced (grafted) either after formation of the high-area solid or during the course of its synthesis. Such open-structure high-area solids facilitate access (i.e. diffusion) of reactants to, and products away from, the active sites that are situated at their internal surfaces. They are typical of the kind of catalysts used extensively in industry. This is one reason why they constitute admirable targets for structural elucidation: such fundamental information as is retrieved is not only of academic interest, it is immediately relevant to commercially important situations (Thomas & Thomas, 1997; Ertl et al., 1997).
But microporous and mesoporous catalysts possess a second advantage in that they are readily amenable to in situ study by a wide range of investigative tools, covering essentially all the spectroscopic techniques as well as X-ray and neutron diffraction (Thomas, 1997). Moreover, they are particularly convenient targets for study by synchrotron-based techniques such as X-ray diffraction (XRD) (separately or in combination) (Couves et al., 1991; Thomas & Greaves, 1994; Clausen & Topsøe, 1996; Als-Nielsen et al., 1995; Thomas et al., 1995; Sankar et al., 1993, 2000; Clausen et al., 1998; Sankar & Thomas, 1999), and, if required, by the additional use of small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) (Aletru et al., 1999). Using experimental setups such as those schematized in Fig. 1, both in situ studies (involving gas–solid systems and atmospheric pressure or higher, and at temperatures well beyond 873 K, or liquid–solid systems up to ca 423 K) and ex situ studies, such as those highlighted below, may be readily conducted.
2. Summarized aims
One of the reasons why such dramatic advances have been made in the study of the mode of action of metallo-enzymes is because detailed structural information pertaining to the metal-centred active sites has been retrieved through the application of high-resolution X-ray diffraction to these enzymes under operating conditions. For the inorganic open-structure oxides (both as such or with heteroatoms grafted on to them), the initial aim is to deploy
either alone (the concentration of heteroatoms is invariably restricted to below 10 wt%) or, preferably, in combination with other techniques (usually XRD or computational approaches). The ultimate aim, however, is to be in a position, after acquiring a precise knowledge of the atomic environment of a catalytically active site, to prepare catalysts of superior performance by modifying both the composition and structure of the active site.There are five distinct categories of catalyst, which we will focus upon here: (i) titanium-centred epoxidation catalysts (§3.1); (ii) chromium–silica catalyst for the polymerization of ethylene (§3.2); (iii) bimetallic, nanoparticle catalysts (e.g. CuRu or PdRu catalysts) supported on silica for the selective hydrogenation of unsaturated hydrocarbons (§3.3); (iv) and (v), molecular sieve catalysts for the aerial (selective) oxidation of and iron-centred microporous catalysts for the shape-selective conversion of cyclohexane to adipic acid in air (§3.4). Full experimental details of how these various kinds of catalysts are investigated in situ or ex situ will emerge during the course of discussions of each.
3. The catalysts
3.1. Epoxidation catalysts based on titanium
For some 20 years, the conversion of propylene to propylene oxide,
has been effected by a so-called Ti/SiO2 catalyst (developed by Shell Co.) which, in the presence of alkylhydroperoxides, typified by tertiary butyl hydroperoxide (TBHP), smoothly converts the propylene to the epoxide, which is an important building block in the chemical industry (Murugavel & Roesky, 1997).
Until very recently, the nature of the active site at which the propylene (or any other alkene) is converted to the epoxide was the subject of much uncertainty and speculation (see Fig. 2a).
Using a well defined procedure (Maschmeyer et al., 1995) for the preparation of single isolated titanium-centred active sites on a mesoporous silica (labelled MCM-41) from a titanocene dichloride precursor, it was established by (extended edge and near edge) (see Fig. 2b) that the active site is a TiIV ion tripodally attached to the underlying silica via three —O—Si bonds and containing one titanol bond (Ti—OH) which stands proud of the surface. There is no evidence from whatsoever for the occurrence of any titanyl groups (top part of Fig. 2a) and, at most, only traces of the bipodally attached di-titanol structure are found (bottom part of Fig. 2a). We can also rule out, on the basis of our independent work (Roberts et al., 1996) on minerals (such as fresnoite) and their synthetic analogues (such as JDF-L1), which by and XRD are shown to contain short Ti=O groups and a five-coordinated central TiIV ion, that there is any five-coordination in the as-prepared TiIV-centred active site in its non-reacted state. By conducting in situ XANES and studies of the active Ti↑MCM-41 (Fig. 3) epoxidation catalyst, one may obtain direct evidence for the expansion of the coordination shell (from fourfold) to close to distorted sixfold coordination during the course of catalytic turnover (Figs. 2b and 2c).
It has also been possible to boost the IV is tripodally attached is replaced by a germanium atom (Oldroyd et al., 1997). Moreover, using soluble titanosilsesquioxanes, and also modifying the immediate environment of the titanium atoms, it can be shown that there is a near-identity between the active site in the heterogeneous and homogeneous epoxidation catalysts (Thomas et al., 1999a).
of the titanium-centred silica catalyst by preparing samples in which one of the three silicons to which the Ti3.2. Chromium silica polymerization catalysts
The discovery by the Philips Company many years ago that traces of chromium inserted into a high-area silica support (such as silica gel) functions as a powerful catalyst for the production of polyethene from ethene, has led to intense debate regarding the cause of the
Over the past 20 years, every single of chromium, from II to VI, has been cited as the root cause.Guided by data acquired for a range of model chromium-containing compounds with various kinds of Cr–O coordination (Fig. 4a), we undertook (Nishimura et al., 2001; Nishimura, 1993) in situ studies of silica supports on to which chromium was grafted via gaseous chromyl chloride CrO2Cl2. It is clear that in the calcined (non-catalytically active) state, CrVI ions in fourfold coordination are dominant. By exposure of this sample to carbon monoxide at ca 673 K, a procedure well known to convert the material into a catalytically active state, we find that the CrII predominates (Fig. 4b).
In the as-synthesized state of CrAlPO-5 (chromium-substituted aluminophosphate number 5), ex situ) shows that there are CrIII ions in octahedral environments. But in the calcined state, where the solid acts as a good catalyst for the selective decomposition of cyclohexyl hydroperoxide into cyclohexanone, it is found that some 40% of the chromium is now in the CrVI state and in tetrahedral coordination (Fig. 5).
analysis (When chromium ions are incorporated into the framework structure of mesoporous silica (such as MCM-41), both et al., 1996), just as there are V=O groups in surface layers of vanadia–titania (Kozlowski et al., 1983) and vanadium-containing MCM-41 (Oldroyd et al., 1998) catalysts.
and FTIR (Fourier transform infrared) spectra reveal the existence of a certain fraction of Cr=O groups (Rey3.3. Bimetallic nanoparticle catalysts
When the physical dimension of a catalyst particle is less than ca 50 Å diameter, XRD is of little value as a structural probe since the active material is essentially X-ray amorphous. however, is better equipped (but not totally satisfactorily; see below) to investigate such materials, as is seen in studies of CuRu (Shephard et al., 1998; Thomas, 1999) and RuPd (Thomas, 1999; Raja et al., 1999) nanocrystals of some 15 Å diameter.
Such well defined bimetallic nanocrystals are conveniently prepared by first anchoring and then gently thermolysing the bimetallic (mixed metal) anions, such as [Ru6C(CO)16.Cu2Cl]2− and [Ru6Pd6(CO)24]2− on to the inner walls of mesoporous silica specimens such as MCM-41. FTIR spectroscopy serves as a good indicator of when the organic drapery attached to the bimetallic cone has been driven off. All the while, detailed in situ measurements of the XANES and features of these materials are carried out (see Fig. 6a).
There is chemical evidence that the two interstitial carbon atoms, present in the parent carbonylate at the centres of the Ru6 octahedra, are retained after the carbonyl groups are driven off thermally. This leaves the structure that is schematized in Fig. 6(b). Analysis of both Ru and Cu K results (of Fig. 6b) is broadly in agreement (Shephard et al., 1998) with this structure: there is certainly strong evidence for the existence of a `base' of four copper atoms, each of which is attached via oxygen to a silicon atom of the underlying mesoporous silica.
XAFS alone, however, though much more revealing that XRD for this purpose, is not a powerful enough tool to permit us to determine the precise structure of the Ru12Cu4C2 anchored cluster. It is necessary to invoke computational assistance.
In association with our colleagues Bromley and Catlow (Bromley et al., 2000) we have employed a blend of interatomic-potential-based molecular-dynamics and energy-minimization simulations, which were used to obtain a range of approximate models of the cluster structures based upon the denuded parent carbonylate in free space. Preliminary molecular-mechanics simulations followed by single-point density functional theory (DFT) calculations were used to identify the lower energy free-space clusters. This procedure produced a number of cluster structures, all of which possessed the `rosette' depicted in Fig. 6.
In further computations (Bromley et al.), the Cu–surface interaction was taken to be via Cu—O—Si, a fact established (see above) in our studies. [Such a link may be readily formed via a pendant silanol Si—O—H bond. It is noteworthy that, in a recent independent theoretical study (Lopez et al., 1999) of minute Cu clusters bound to a silica surface, the Cu—O—Si link was found to be energetically favourable.] Using such linkages, the DFT-optimized rosette cluster was then `grafted' onto various representations of the silica surface and geometry-optimized using DFT, using the program Dmol3 (Delley, 1990, 1997). The results (one of which is shown in Fig. 6d) illustrate nicely the competing effects of bulk cluster relaxation and different support interations.
Here we see that there has been substantial movement of the carbon atoms from their original interstitial positions. A comparison of experimental and simulated c) is very encouraging.
results (Fig. 6At present there seem to be few, if any, other experimental tools that are sufficiently penetrating, first to arrive at the atomic architecture of the anchored cluster and, second, to locate precisely the positions taken up by the carbon atoms.
3.4. Molecular-sieve catalysts for the regio- and shape-selective oxidation of alkanes
Framework-substituted molecular-sieve aluminophosphate microporous solids are the `centre pieces' of a new approach (Raja & Thomas, 1998; Thomas et al., 1999b; Raja et al., 2000) to the aerobic oxyfunctionalization of saturated hydrocarbons. The sieves and the few percent of the AlIII sites within them that are replaced by catalytically active transition-metal ions in high oxidation states (CoIII, MnIII, FeIII) are so-designed as to allow free access of oxygen into and out of the interior of these high-area solids. Certain metal-substituted molecular sieves permit only end-on approach of linear to the active centres, thereby favouring enhanced reactivity of terminal methyl groups. By optimizing the cage dimension with respect to that of the hydrocarbon reactant, as well as adjusting the average separation of active centres within a cage, and by choosing the sieve with the appropriate pore aperture, highly selective conversions can be achieved, such as 1-hexane to hexanoic acid and a few C2 products,
or 1-hexane to adipic acid,
Moreover, with the right choice of molecular sieve and metal-ion III (MnIII) AlPO catalysts is that such reactions may be effected at low temperature and heterogeneously using air as oxidant (Kellog, 2000). Adipic acid [the product of reaction (3) above] is also produced in high yield when cyclohexane is aerobically oxidized over a so-called FeIIIAlPO-31 catalyst. We have described elsewhere (Dugal et al., 2000, Fig. 14 therein) how analysis pinned down the nature of the active site in this catalyst. The XAFS-derived Fe—O bond distance and Debye–Waller factor are, respectively, 3.85 ± 0.40, 1.85 (2) Å and 0.0045 Å2 (see Fig. 7).
cyclohexane may be selectively converted to cyclohexanol, cyclohexanone and adipic acid. The great merit of the CoWhen Co (Mn) AlPO catalysts are used for selective oxidation reactions, determinations of the nature of the active site, under controlled atmosphere, are more convenient to record than under reaction conditions (because of safety considerations arising from relatively high-pressure operation of the catalytic reactor). With solid acid catalysts (Chen & Thomas, 1994; Thomas et al., 1994) (such as CoIIAlPO-18), however, because reactions such as the dehydration of methanol to light proceed smoothly at atmospheric pressure, in situ determination of the nature of the CoII-centred site (with its loosely attached proton bound to a nearby framework oxygen functioning as a Brønsted acid) may be readily carried out.
4. Concluding comments
et al., 1998; Bando et al., 1996; Chun et al., 1996; Ohata, 1998; Koningsberger & Mojet, 2000; Knop-Gericke et al., 2000; Edelmann et al., 2000; Pillep et al., 1999), ever since it first (Kozolowski et al., 1983) began to be used to probe the structures of model catalytic systems (under rather poorly defined ambient conditions). Now that it has become almost routine to establish the electronic and atomic structure of catalytically active solids (which constitute no more than a percent of all the atoms present) on time scales of fractions of a second and upwards, we now await progress that will take the time domain of measurement to the nanosecond or beyond. Ideally, just as in the new realm of femtochemistry opened up by Zewail (2000), one would wish to be able to harness new developments in synchrotron physics, of the type described at XI by David Norman (2001), so as to permit perhaps nano- or picosecond resolution in acquiring data. By achieving this target, the dynamics of bond breaking and bond making, and consequential atomic rearrangement, will become accessible.
has already proved invaluable in our and other workers hands (ClausenAcknowledgements
JMT acknowledges continued support from EPSRC (UK) and GS thanks the Leverhulme trust for a Senior Research Fellowship
References
Aletru, C., Greaves, G. N., Sankar, G. & Kempsen, V. (1999). Jpn J. Appl. Phys. 38, 97–100. CAS
Als-Nielsen, J., Grubel, G. & Clausen, B. S. (1995). Nucl. Instrum. Methods B, 97, 522–525. CAS
Bando, K. K., Asakura, K., Iwasawa, Y., Arokawa, H. & Elsobe, K. (1996). J. Phys. Chem. 100, 13636–13645. CrossRef CAS Web of Science
Bromley, S. T., Sankar, G., Catlow, C. R. A. & Thomas, J. M. (2000). Microporous Mesoporous Mater. In the press.
Chen, J. & Thomas, J. M. (1994). J. Chem. Soc. Chem. Commun. pp. 603–604. CrossRef Web of Science
Chun, W.-J., Asakura, K. & Iwasawa, Y. (1996). Appl. Surf. Sci. 101, 143–146. CrossRef Web of Science
Clausen, B. S. & Topsøe, H. (1996). X-ray Absorption Fine Structure for Catalysts and Surfaces, edited by Y. Iwasawa, ch. 7.5. Singapore: World Scientific.
Clausen, B.-S., Topsøe, H. & Frahm, R. (1998). Adv. Catal. 42, 315–344. Web of Science CrossRef CAS
Couves, J. W., Thomas, J. M., Waller, D., Jones, R. H., Dent, A. J., Derbyshire, G. E. & Greaves, G. N. (1991). Nature (London), 354, 465–468. CrossRef CAS Web of Science
Delley, B. (1990). J. Chem. Phys. 92, 508–517. CrossRef CAS Web of Science
Delley, B. (1997). Dmol3 User Guide, MSI, San Diego, USA.
Dugal, M., Sankar, G., Raja, R. & Thomas, J. M. (2000). Angew. Chem. 39, 2310–2313. CrossRef CAS
Edelmann, A., Scheisser, W., Vinek, H. & Jentys, A. (2000). Catal. Lett. 69, 11–16. Web of Science CrossRef CAS
Ertl, G., Knozinger, H. & Weitkamp, J. (1997). Handbook of Heterogeneous Catalysis. Weinheim: Wiley VCH.
Gleeson, D., Sankar, G., Catlow, C. R. A., Thomas, J. M., Spano, G., Bordiga, S., Lamberti, C. & Zecchina, A. (2000). Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2, 4812–4817. Web of Science CrossRef CAS
Kellogg, R. M. (2000). Chemtracts, 13, 33–37. CAS
Knop-Gericke, A., Havecker, M., Schedel-Niedrig, Th. & Schlogl, R. (2000). Top. Catal. 10, 187–198. CAS
Koningsberger, D. C. & Mojet, B. (2000). Editors. Role and Contribution of XAFS Spectroscopy in Catalysis, Top. Catal. 10, special issue.
Kozlowski, R., Pettifer, R. F. & Thomas, J. M. (1983). J. Phys. Chem. 87, 5172–5176. CrossRef CAS Web of Science
Lopez, N., Illas, F. & Pachioni, G. (1999). J. Phys. Chem. B, 103, 1712–1718. Web of Science CrossRef CAS
Maschmeyer, T., Rey, F., Sankar, G. & Thomas, J. M. (1995). Nature (London), 378, 159–162. CrossRef CAS Web of Science
Murugavel, R. & Roesky, H. W. (1997). Angew. Chem. 36, 477–479. CrossRef CAS
Nishimura, M. (1993). PhD thesis, University of London (Royal Institution).
Nishimura, M., Sankar, G. & Thomas, J. M. (2001). In preparation.
Norman, D. (2001). J. Synchrotron Rad. 8, 72–75. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals
Ohata, T. (1998). J. Electron Spectrosc. 92, 131–139.
Oldroyd, R. D., Sankar, G. & Thomas, J. M. (1997). Chem. Commun. pp. 2025–2026. CrossRef Web of Science
Oldroyd, R. D., Sankar, G., Thomas, J. M., Hunnius, M. & Maier, W. F. (1998). J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans. 94, 3177–3182. Web of Science CrossRef CAS
Pillep, B., Behrens, P., Schubert, U.-A., Spengler, J. & Knozinger, H. (1999). J. Phys. Chem. 103, 9595–9603. CrossRef CAS
Raja, R., Sankar, G., Hermans, S., Shephard, D. S., Bromley, S., Thomas, J. M., Johnson, B. F. G. & Maschmeyer, T. (1999). Chem. Commun. pp. 1571–1572. Web of Science CrossRef
Raja, R., Sankar, G. & Thomas, J. M. (2000). Angew. Chem. 39, 2313–2316. CrossRef CAS
Raja, R. & Thomas, J. M. (1998). Chem. Commun. pp. 829–830.
Rey, F., Sankar, G., Maschmeyer, T., Thomas, J. M., Bell, R. G. & Greaves, G. N. (1996). Top. Catal. 3, 121–134. CrossRef CAS Web of Science
Roberts, M. A., Sankar, G., Thomas, J. M., Jones, R. H., Du, H., Chen, J., Pang, W. & Xu, R. (1996). Nature (London), 381, 401–404. CrossRef CAS Web of Science
Sankar, G. & Thomas, J. M. (1999). Top. Catal. 8, 1–21. Web of Science CrossRef CAS
Sankar, G., Thomas, J. M. & Catlow, C. R. A. (2000). Top. Catal. 10, 255–264. Web of Science CrossRef CAS
Sankar, G., Wright, P. A., Natarajan, S., Thomas, J. M., Greaves, G. N., Dent, A. J., Dobson, B. R., Ramsdale, C. A. & Jones, R. H. (1993). J. Phys. Chem. 97, 9550–9554. CrossRef CAS Web of Science
Sheldon, R. A. (1983). J. Mol. Catal. 20, 1. CrossRef
Shephard, D. S., Maschmeyer, T., Sankar, G., Thomas, J. M., Ozkaya, D., Johnson, B. F. G., Raja, R., Oldroyd, R. D. & Bell, R. G. (1998). Chem. Eur. J. 4, 1214–1224. CrossRef CAS
Thomas, J. M. (1997). Chem. Eur. J. 3, 1557–1562. CrossRef CAS Web of Science
Thomas, J. M. (1999). Angew. Chem Int. Ed. Engl. 38, 3589–3628. CrossRef CAS
Thomas, J. M. & Greaves, G. N. (1994). Science, 265, 1675–1676. CrossRef PubMed CAS Web of Science
Thomas, J. M., Greaves, G. N. & Catlow, C. R. A. (1995). Nucl. Instrum. Methods B, 97, 1–10. CrossRef CAS Web of Science
Thomas, J. M., Greaves, G. N., Sankar, G., Wright, P. A., Chen, J., Dent, A. J. & Marchese, L. (1994). Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 33, 1871–1873. CrossRef Web of Science
Thomas, J. M., Raja, R., Sankar, G. & Bell, R. G. (1999). Nature (London), 398, 227–230. Web of Science CrossRef CAS
Thomas, J. M., Sankar, G., Klunduk, M. C., Attfield, M. P., Maschmeyer, T., Johnson, B. F. G. & Bell, R. G. (1999). J. Phys. Chem. 103, 8809–8813. CrossRef CAS
Thomas, J. M. & Thomas, W. J. (1997). Heterogeneous Catalysis: Principles and Practice. Weinheim: Wiley VCH.
Zewail, A. H. (2000). Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 39, 2586–2631. CrossRef CAS
© International Union of Crystallography. Prior permission is not required to reproduce short quotations, tables and figures from this article, provided the original authors and source are cited. For more information, click here.