bioXAS and metallogenomics
X-ray absorption spectroscopic studies on model compounds for biological iodine and bromine
aDepartment of Organic Chemistry, Institute of Molecules and Materials (IMM), Radboud University Nijmegen, 1 Toernooiveld, NL-6525 ED Nijmegen, The Netherlands, bDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106, USA, cUniversität Konstanz, Fachbereich Biologie, D-78457 Konstanz, Germany, and dEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL), DESY, Notkestrasse 85, D-22603 Hamburg, Germany
*Correspondence e-mail: m.feiters@science.ru.nl
X-ray absorption spectra of a number of organic iodine and bromine compounds of biological relevance, as well as of a series of iodine compounds with different oxidation states, have been measured. The iodine K-edge spectra (XANES) are found to be relatively featureless but the position of the edge is found to be sensitive to formal valence (among other factors), and the edge shape to the number of bound O atoms. spectra of organohalogen compounds (both iodine and bromine) can be used to discriminate between aliphatic and aromatic compounds. There are differences both in the distances from the halogens to the first shell of C atoms, which are shorter for aromatic compounds, and in the patterns of shells in the Fourier transforms. This result is expected to be relevant to studies at these edges in biological systems.
1. Introduction
In recent years, X-ray absorption spectroscopy has been applied to elucidate the chemistry of an increasing variety of elements in biological systems, initially mainly relatively abundant transition metals in metalloproteins (Cramer, 1988), more recently also trace elements like Sr (Greegor et al., 1997) or Hg (Harris et al., 2003), also including non-metals like S (Pickering et al., 1998, 2001) and Se (Pickering et al., 1999; Lee et al., 2001). We have recently started studies on the halogen metabolism of brown algae, in which we expect to be able to establish both the chemical environment as well as the formal of iodine and bromine under a number of physiologically relevant circumstances. We report here on our preparatory study on a number of model compounds relevant to the biological studies by which we explore the potential of the X-ray absorption technique to identify both chemical environments and oxidation states of iodine and bromine. The compounds were selected with the specific problem of halogen metabolism by brown algae in mind but are expected to have relevance to other future biological X-ray absorption studies at the iodine and bromine K edges.
The current view on the biogeochemical cycle of iodine is schematically represented in Fig. 1. The most important role of iodine in mammals is in the thyroid hormones thyroxine and T3, which are both iodinated tyrosine derivatives that are interconverted by iodination/deiodination, and play a role in regulating the basal metabolism rate. Iodine occurs in sea water mainly as iodate but is reduced to iodide possibly through the action of nitrate reductase in bacteria and phytoplankton (Farrenkopf et al., 1997; Wong et al., 2002). In this form it is actively accumulated by brown algae like Laminaria digitata by a factor of 106 to a concentration as high as 73 mM through the action of vanadium haloperoxidase, requiring hydrogen peroxide as a cosubstrate (Küpper et al., 1998). Not surprisingly, iodine was first identified as an element early in the 19th century (Courtois, 1813) in the ashes of these brown algae (kelp). Laminariales can be considered a major contributor to the biogeochemical pump of iodine from the ocean to the atmosphere (Carpenter et al., 2000) as they are very active in the so-called iodovolatilization, i.e. the incorporation of iodine in volatile organoiodine compounds. The established role of haloperoxidase, which can both oxidize halides to the hypohalous acid level as well as incorporate halogens in organic substrates (for review, see Butler et al., 2001) in the accumulation of iodine (Küpper et al., 1998), raises the question as to what form it is stored in algae, possibly in specialized The question of the chemical form of accumulated iodine in brown algae had already evoked interest in the 19th century, but is still controversial despite a number of studies. Eschle (1897) reported that iodine in Laminaria is present `almost exclusively' in organic form. In contrast, Kylin (1929) suggested that, in Laminaria, iodine was present mainly as iodide, but presumed also the existence of organically bound iodine. Roche & Yagi (1952) proposed that the iodine was present as iodotyrosines, which are potential products of the action of haloperoxidase on tyrosine (Almeida et al., 2001). In contrast, Amat & Srivastava (1985) and Amat (1985) reported the extraction of only iodide from Laminaria, not detecting iodotyrosines. All these results were obtained after heating and drying or extraction of algal tissues. Owing to the chemical instability of many organic iodine compounds and the reactivity of the biological medium, they have to be taken with a certain caution, and non-invasive in situ measurements like X-ray absorption spectroscopy appear desirable. Furthermore, non-invasive methods are indispensable for studying functional aspects of intracellular iodine chemistry under different physiological circumstances.
Like iodine, bromine is an essential ) and red (von Stosch, 1962) macroalgae. The concentration of bromine in sea water is three orders of magnitude higher (0.7 mM, virtually all bromide ions) than that of iodine, and it is incorporated by various organisms (bacteria, diatoms, algae) in a stunning variety of organic compounds (Gribble, 2000). It is imaginable that, like that of iodine, the accumulation of bromine by algae is mediated by haloperoxidase, again raising the question in what form it is stored. In fact many of the volatile organohalogens formed by the algae, as mentioned above for iodine, are mixed iodine/bromine compounds (Carpenter et al., 2000).
for the growth of brown (Woolery & Lewin, 1973In setting up the study we were particularly interested in two aspects: (i) the determination of the ) can be divided into two parts, viz. the region near the edge or X-ray absorption near-edge spectrum (XANES), and the region extending a few hundreds of eV beyond the edge, the so-called extended X-ray absorption fine structure (EXAFS). As it is expected that the edge position in the XANES part of the spectrum will shift to higher energy when the charge on the central atom is higher, this provides information on its (formal) The intensity of possible transitions in the edge region usually provides information on the symmetry of the environment, and the edge shape has been adequately reproduced in recent model calculations (Mijovilovich & Meyer-Klaucke, 2003; Benfatto & Della-Longa, 2001). Moreover, the white-line intensity correlates for similar systems with the number of ligands, as demonstrated in a study on non-heme iron in phenylalanine hydroxylase (Mijovilovich & Meyer-Klaucke, 2003). The part of the spectrum in fact measures X-ray induced electron diffraction, constituting an interference pattern of electron waves going out of the central atom and backscattered by surrounding atoms; it can be background-subtracted and Fourier-transformed to reveal, after phase correction, a radial distribution function of atoms around the central atom.
from the edge, and (ii) the determination of the chemical environment from the fine structure. The X-ray (XAS; Koningsberger & Prins, 1988Earlier applications of viz. of Br to V in haloperoxidase (Dau et al., 1999; Rehder et al., 2000), and of Cl to Mn in photosynthetic systems (Rompel et al., 1997). In an early application of on iodine in a biological system, a study (Hashimoto & Ishii, 2000) on iodine in the strawberry conch Strombus luhuanus (Ishii, 1997), an environment of carbon neighbours, presumably in a protein, was identified, which was, however, not defined. In the case of organoiodine or organobromine compounds, it is of interest to see if there are shells in the Fourier transforms of the spectra beyond the first shell of directly bound carbon, that allow the discrimination between the incorporation of the halogen atom in a molecule that has just a single carbon, or in a molecule where the carbon is either in an aliphatic or an aromatic environment. Besides representatives of inorganic iodine (iodide, iodate) and corresponding bromine compounds, covering the range of oxidation states of −1 to +7 for iodine, a selection of organohalogen compounds with the halogen in various biologically relevant environments were therefore measured, compared and simulated.
to halogens in biological systems focused on the possible coordination of halogens to metal ions,It was realised that, in the case of the presence of additional shells in the Fourier transforms, the spectra would have to be analysed and simulated with multiple-scattering calculations. In an earlier GNXAS were reported (Burattini et al., 1993), which were in good agreement with the experimental data and described the multiple-scattering phenomena adequately. The earlier aforementioned biological Br studies used the analysis programme FEFFIT (Stern et al., 1995). In the present study, we preferred the application of EXCURVE (Gurman et al., 1984, 1986; Binsted et al., 1992). Owing to its option it is better adapted to deal with one specific target of this study, the discrimination between aliphatic and aromatic compounds in an unknown biological sample.
study on organobromine compounds, simulations for a similar set of compounds using the simulation programme2. Material and methods
2.1. Compounds
3-Iodotyrosine, 3,5-diiodotyrosine, 4-bromophenylalanine and 3,5-dibromotyrosine were obtained from Sigma; iodoform was from Acros; all other compounds were from Aldrich.
2.2. measurements
K-edge measurements, a Si 311 monochromator was used and the station was set up without a focusing mirror. For Br K-edge measurements the set-up comprised a Si 111 monochromator and a focusing mirror with a cut-off energy of 21.5 keV. In both cases monochromators were order-sorting and set at 50% of peak intensity to suppress harmonics (Hermes et al., 1984). During data collection, the storage ring DORIS III was operated at 4.5 GeV with ring currents between 150 and 90 mA. The station features a CANBERRA 13-element solid-state fluorescence detector which was used for the solution measurements. Solid samples were diluted in BN to a concentration which would approximately give an edge step of the X-ray μ of 1. HESAR glass cells with Kapton (or polyimide) windows were used for the solid samples and the aqueous solutions; for organic solvents we used a glueless cell with Kapton windows (Sprakel et al., 2002). For the Br K-edge measurements, the energy-calibration device (Pettifer & Hermes, 1985) was applied. Scans at the I K-edge were calibrated by reference to the of a NaI sample between the signal ion chamber and the calibrator detector. Typically three to five scans per sample were taken. The sample was kept at 20 K during the measurements and moved in between scans so that the part of the sample that was exposed to the beam was varied as much as possible. No spectroscopic differences between scans were observed.
measurements were carried out in the European Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL) Outstation in the Hamburg Synchrotron Laboratory (HASYLAB) at the Deutsches Elektronensynchrotron (DESY) in Hamburg, Germany. For I2.3. data reduction and simulations
Data reduction was carried out at the EMBL and in Nijmegen with the EMBL Outstation data-reduction package (Nolting & Hermes, 1992), including the energy calibration programmes CALIB and ROTAX, the averaging programme AVERAGE and the background-subtraction programme REMOVE. Simulations of the calibrated, averaged and background-subtracted were carried out on the CLRC Daresbury Laboratory (Warrington, UK) dedicated computer, xrsserv1, and at the EMBL computer, butthead, using the 1998 release of the simulation programme EXCURVE (Gurman et al., 1984, 1986; Binsted et al., 1991). The ab initio calculation of phase shift and backscattering factors in EXCURVE was run with its default options, i.e. Hedin–Lundqvist ground state (Hedin & Lundqvist, 1969) and the von Barth exchange potential (von Barth & Hedin, 1972). Multiple-scattering simulations were run in the default setting of small-atom approximation (Rehr & Albers, 1990) with the maximum path length (plmax) extended from the default value of 10 to 15 Å where appropriate. EXCURVE was selected for the simulations because of the possibility of simulating and iteratively refining the multiple scattering of rigid ring systems with restraints (Binsted et al., 1992). The difference between in which an idealized geometry is imposed, and is that in the latter more parameters are refined but that deviations from idealized values for the interatomic distances are weighted and incorporated in the fit index during the iteration. In the present work, restrained refinements of the of aromatic iodine and bromine compounds were run by analogy to our previous work on Cu pyridine complexes (Feiters et al., 1999).
3. Results and discussion
A comparison of edges of compounds with different formal oxidation states for iodine is made in Fig. 2 (see Fig. 3 for structures). The energy at half-height of such edges has been found to be a reasonably reliable measure of the edge position (Dau et al., 2003). For a series of iodine compounds, we observe that the edge position shifts to higher energy with valence, going from iodine in BN (formal valence 0, 33164.1 eV) to o-iodosobenzoic acid (+1, 33165.4 eV), iodate (+5, 33167.8 eV) and periodate (+7, 33168.5 eV). However, it should be noted that iodide (formal valence −1, 33167.7 eV) does not follow the trend, having approximately the same energy at half-height as iodate (+5), and there is still a considerable energy step from periodate to H5IO6 (33170.3 eV) although there is no change in formal valence. The iodine and iodide spectra do not exhibit special features, but for the other compounds the intensity of the white line between 33170 and 33180 eV is found to increase roughly with the number of O atoms bound to iodine, going from o-iodosobenzoic acid via iodate to periodate and its fully hydrated form, H5IO6, whereas the shoulder at 33190 eV is particularly strong in iodine compounds with a large number of doubly bound O atoms. Considering that the doubly bound O atoms are on average at a shorter distance from the iodine than the other O atoms, the shift to higher energy for the edge position going from periodate to H5IO6 is in line with the observed shift to higher energy with longer average ligand distance for Mn compounds (Dau et al., 2003). Compared with Fig. 2, the edges of the organic iodine compounds (Fig. 4, see Figs. 3 and 5 for structures) do not show characteristic features, and therefore do not allow distinction of the chemical speciation of iodine in these compounds, unlike the situation for e.g. sulfur compounds when measured at the sulfur K edge (George & Gorbaty, 1989; Pickering et al., 2001). The position of the edge for the organic compounds could have been expected to depend, for example, on the number of other iodine atoms bound to a carbon, or the of the carbon, but the energy resolution (±2 eV) is too low to allow these trends, if at all present, to be distinguished. Compared with the Br K-edge spectra, which will be discussed below, the I K edges are relatively featureless. The difference is due to the core-hole lifetime effect for iodine, i.e. the broadening of the spectral features because of the reduced lifetime of the The iodine compounds might show more characteristic features at the L edge but that was not included in this study because (i) the of photons in biological material at the energy of the I L edge (L3 edge at 4560 eV) is relatively short, resulting in a large absorption and a low compared with the I K edge, and (ii) the energy range for the I L edge is limited to 300 eV, owing to the partial overlap of the three L edges.
The b) show very strong signals, which can be simulated with a shell of close O atoms at 1.79 Å (Table 1) in line with recent literature results (Bonhoure et al., 2002). On the contrary, the weak signal observed for the sodium iodide solution (Fig. 6a) reflects the absence of any atoms covalently bound to the atom of the iodide ion, the only detectable contribution being the O atoms of the first shell of solvation by water molecules. The distance of 3.56 Å is in good agreement with the values of 3.60 Å found in an X-ray diffraction study on a concentrated aqueous NaI solution (Maeda & Ohtaki, 1975) and the 3.50 Å from earlier studies (Tanida & Watanabe, 2000). The occupancy of 10 appears to be somewhat overestimated compared with the value of 6 that was assumed in those studies, but agrees well with the 10–11 close O atoms identified in the environment of the iodide ion in an X-ray crystallographic study (Thiele & Putzas, 1984).
and Fourier transform of sodium iodate in aqueous solution (Fig. 6
|
The b) show the effect of iodine backscattering, which can be distinguished from other backscattering contributions like that of carbon by its characteristic higher amplitude at higher k, as also shown by the spectra of various organic compounds containing multiple iodine atoms, like iodoform (CHI3, Fig. 7a) and 1,2-diiodoethane (EtI2, Fig. 7c). The spectra of the organoiodine compounds indicate that there are contributions of other atoms than just the carbon bound to the central iodine atom; this means that, unlike the I K-edge spectra, the I K would offer the possibility of distinguishing different chemical environments for iodine even within the class of organoiodine compounds. It is therefore of interest to compare the spectra of aliphatic iodine compounds like that of 1,2-diiodoethane (Fig. 7c) with those of aromatic compounds, for example 3-iodotyrosine (Fig. 7d). Interestingly, the latter spectrum shows in its Fourier transform the pattern that is known from studies of metal complexes to be characteristic for coordination of a metal by a (hetero-)aromatic ring, such as observed for Cu pyridine complexes (Karlin et al., 1988; Feiters et al., 1999); even the atoms that would appear to be very remote from the central atom contribute very strongly to the spectrum, owing to the rigidity of the ring and the presence of reinforcing multiple scattering effects in it. Clearly, aliphatic and aromatic organoiodine compounds can be distinguished on the basis of the spectra, in particular their Fourier transforms. This is a very important insight which is expected to have its impact on biological iodine studies.
and Fourier transforms of iodine (Fig. 7The simulations for the compounds containing multiple iodine atoms in Figs. 7(a)–7(c) and Fig. 7(e) show that the characteristic amplitude envelope of iodine is well reproduced at various distances. The in Figs. 7(a)–7(c) is dominated by the backscattering of the other iodine atoms in the molecule, which has a high amplitude at high k; this tends to suppress the significance in the of weaker contributions that dominate the spectrum at lower k. This effect results in deviations between experimental and simulated spectra but according to the Fourier transforms these are due only to contributions at relatively large distances from the central atom; hence there is no reason to question the result of the simulation for the contributions at low R in the Fourier transform. Refining in k- instead of k3-weighting did not result in a better agreement for the low-k region of the as judged by visual inspection. The result for the simulation of the spectrum of elementary iodine for the iodine–iodine distance (Table 1, 2.71 Å) is in reasonable agreement with the literature value of 2.67 Å (Cotton & Wilkinson, 1988). In the simulation of 1,2-diiodoethane, the I—I distance (3.85 Å) is relatively short, indicating that the preferential relative conformation for the iodine substituents on the C—C bond is gauche; an antiperiplanar conformation would have resulted in a much longer I—I distance (∼5 Å). In the simulations of iodoform (Fig. 7a) and 1,2-diiodoethane (Fig. 7c), the distances between the I and the sp3-hybridized C of 2.16 and 2.18 Å (Table 1) are longer than those between the I and the sp2-hybridized C of the aromatic rings in the I-substituted tyrosines (Figs. 7d and 7e) which are only 2.07 Å (Fig. 5); this is in line with the shorter atomic radius for sp2-hybridized carbon compared with sp3-hybridized carbon. In addition to the aforementioned characteristic pattern of aromatic rings, the accurate distance information derived from the offers another approach to distinguishing between incorporation of iodine in an aliphatic or an aromatic compound. The multiple-scattering simulations for the aromatic compounds in Figs. 7(d) and 7(e) were calculated on the basis of the geometries given in Fig. 5, and refined in EXCURV98 using so-called (Binsted et al., 1992), with the optimum values of the distances between adjacent C atoms in the phenyl ring set to 1.39 Å and those between C atoms with one carbon in between to 2.41 Å.
The edges of the organic bromine compounds (Fig. 8, see Figs. 9 and 12 for structures) exhibit much more fine structure than those of the iodine compounds, because of the shorter core-hole lifetime effect for heavier elements, as mentioned above. Although the traces for the two aromatic compounds, 4-bromophenylalanine and 3,5-dibromotyrosine, resemble each other most, it is not possible to use the edge structures to classify compounds as aliphatic or aromatic on the basis of the Br edge. The edge of a 10 mM aqueous solution of sodium bromate (not shown) was found to have a very intensive (intensity approximately doubled) white line compared with that of 10 mM sodium bromide (Fig. 8, bottom trace), but in spite of the higher it was only at a marginally (<0.5 eV) higher energy.
The a) and sea water (Fig. 10b) could be simulated by O atoms (of solvating water molecules) at 3.33 and 3.29 Å (Table 2), respectively. Owing to the large distance of these O atoms to the bromine and in spite of their large number, the signal is relatively weak compared with that of other compounds as well as to that of aqueous sodium bromate (Fig. 10c) which has a strong oxygen contribution at 1.65 Å (Table 2). The bromine–oxygen distance of 3.29–3.33 Å in our simulations is significantly longer than that found in a room-temperature study (3.19 Å; Tanida et al., 1994) but in good agreement with a combined room-temperature EXAFS/molecular dynamics study (3.34 Å; d'Angelo et al., 1994). The occupancy found in our refined simulations (10.7–11.1) is much higher than that found in the EXAFS/molecular dynamics study (6.7; d'Angelo et al., 1994); the value in the literature is probably more accurate in view of the adequate modelling of the asymmetry in the radial distribution of the shell of solvating O atoms derived from the molecular dynamics.
spectra of aqueous sodium bromide (Fig. 10
|
It should be noted that the sodium bromide and sea-water spectra contain low-frequency contributions, visible in the k = 4–5 Å−1, and in the Fourier transform as an apparent shell of atoms at a distance lower than the first shell of simulated O atoms, which are not included in the simulation. Such contributions have been observed before for bromine (d'Angelo et al., 1993; Burattini et al., 1993) and for other elements, like Sr (d'Angelo et al., 1997), where they have been ascribed to the presence of like the KN1 and KM4,5 edge (= double electron excitation involving one 1s and 3d electron). An alternative explanation is to assume that, in addition to the fine structure caused by electron backscattering off surrounding atoms, the an additional fine structure exists, which is caused by electron backscattering off the interatomic potential (atomic or AXAFS) (Rehr et al., 1995; O'Grady & Ramaker, 1998; Wende & Baberschke, 1999). In both cases the question arises as to why we observe the phenomenon only in the specific case of the samples with aqueous bromide. We propose that this is due to incomplete removal of the low-frequency contributions in our background-subtraction procedure in the case of weak In other studies at the Br K edge (Dau et al., 1999), contributions at lower distance, e.g. 2 Å in the case of aqueous sodium bromide, were also observed; in this case an explanation specific to the hydrated bromide ion, viz. an assignment to H atoms (from the water molecules) was proposed (in addition to other explanations). This is of course reasonable as the H atoms are the closest atoms in the environment of the hydrated bromide and, recently, hydrogen contributions have even been discerned in the spectra of hydrated metal ions, where O atoms, not H atoms, are the atoms closest to the central atom (d'Angelo et al., 2002). In our spectra, however, we were unable to simulate the low-frequency contribution with H atoms, as they did not match these shells when allowed to float in a Therefore, we prefer an explanation of the low-frequency oscillation as due to a general physical atomic absorption effect and assume that it is observed only in the hydrated bromide spectra because it could not be removed in the background subtraction owing to the weakness of the in these spectra.
as a significant depression aroundThe comparison of the Fourier transforms of the organobromine compounds (Fig. 11, bottom panels) reveals that a distinction between aromatic and can be made for bromine, as concluded before for iodine; the patterns of shells in the Fourier transforms in Figs. 11(c) and 11(d) resemble those in Figs. 7(d) and 7(e), although they are shifted to lower R (distance) because bonds with bromine are shorter than bonds with iodine. The spectrum of CHBr3 (Fig. 11a) can be simulated with carbon and bromine contributions at 1.92 and 3.17 Å, respectively; that of 11-bromoundecanoic acid (Fig. 11b) by C atoms of the alkyl tail at 1.96, 2.86 and 4.27 Å. As noted before in a study of aqueous solutions of small organobromine compounds, intermolecular effects such as interaction with solvent (d'Angelo et al., 1994) or, in our case, BN and other organobromine molecules can affect the spectra; simulations of these effects fall outside the scope of the present study but this neglect does result in significant differences between the experimental spectra and fits based only on considerations of intramolecular effects. The spectrum of 4-bromophenylalanine (Fig. 11c) is simulated by the contribution of a phenyl ring and an additional carbon (Fig. 12, left, including multiple scattering), and that of dibromotyrosine (Fig. 11d) by a phenyl ring with the second bromine at 5.65 Å as well as contributions from the oxygen of the hydroxyl group in the ring and the first carbon of the side chain (Fig. 12, right, including multiple scattering). Although the difference in bond length between bonds of bromine with sp3- or sp2-hybridized carbon is not as large as that found for iodine (1.92–1.96 versus 1.87–1.88 Å), it is large enough to give significant differences in the thus providing an additional feature to distinguish bromine in aliphatic and aromatic environments.
4. Conclusions
We conclude that the iodine K-edge positions and structures are sensitive to formal valence, showing an edge shift to higher energy except for iodide. The multiple-scattering effects in the aromatic rings of aromatic organohalogen compounds are adequately reproduced with the simulations in EXCURVE. spectra of organohalogen compounds (both iodine and bromine) can be used to discriminate between aliphatic and aromatic compounds. There are differences both in the distances from the halogens to the first shell of C atoms, which are shorter for aromatic compounds, and in the patterns of shells in the Fourier transforms. This result is expected to be relevant to studies at these edges in biological systems.
Footnotes
‡Present address: The Scottish Association for Marine Science, Dunstaffnage Marine Laboratory, Oban, Argyll PA37 1QA, UK.
Acknowledgements
The authors received support from the European Community in the framework of the Access to Research Infrastructure Action of the Improving Human Potential Programme to the EMBL Hamburg Outstation, contract number HPRI-CT-1999-00017. We are grateful to Peter M. H. Kroneck (Universität Konstanz) and Alison Butler (University of California, Santa Barbara) for stimulating and useful discussions, and for funding part of the position of FCK (through grants from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft to P. M. H. Kroneck and from the National Institutes of Health to A. Butler).
References
Alicke, B., Hebestreit, K., Stiutz, J. & Platt, U. (1999). Nature (London), 397, 572–573. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Almeida, M., Duarte, C., Alexandre, A., Humanes, M. & Fraústo da Silva, J. J. R. (2001). J. Inorg. Biochem. 86, 121. Google Scholar
Amat, M. A. (1985). PhD thesis, Universitaire Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris, France. Google Scholar
Amat, M. A. & Srivastava, L. M. (1985). J. Phycol. 21, 330–333. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Benfatto, M. & Della Longa, S. (2001). J. Synchrotron Rad. 8, 1087–1094. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Binsted, N., Campbell, J. W., Gurman, S. J. & Stephenson, P. C. (1991). EXCURV92. Daresbury Laboratory, Warrington, UK. Google Scholar
Binsted, N., Strange, R. W. & Hasnain, S. S. (1992). Biochemistry, 31, 12117–12125. CrossRef PubMed CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Bonhoure, I., Scheidegger, A. M., Wieland, E. & Dähn, R. (2002). Radiochim. Acta, 90, 674–651. Web of Science CrossRef Google Scholar
Burattini, E., D'Angelo, P., DiCicco, A., Filipponi, A. & Pavel, N. V. (1993). J. Phys. Chem. 97, 5486–5494. CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Butler, A., Carter, J. N. & Simpson, M. T. (2001). Vanadium in Proteins and Enzymes, In Handbook on Metalloproteins, edited by I. Bertini, A. Sigel and H. Sigel. New York: Marcel Dekker. Google Scholar
Carpenter, L. J., Malin, G., Liss, P. S. & Küpper, F. C. (2000). Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles, 14, 1191–1204. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Cotton, F. A. & Wilkinson, G. (1988). Advanced Inorganic Chemistry, 5th ed. New York: Wiley-Interscience. Google Scholar
Courtois, B. (1813). Ann. Chim. Phys. 88, 311–318. Google Scholar
Cramer, S. P. (1988). X-ray Absorption Spectroscopy, edited by D. C. Koningsberger and R. Prins, pp. 257–320. New York: Wiley. Google Scholar
D'Angelo, P., Barone, V., Chillieni, G., Sanna, N., Meyer-Klaucke, W. & Pavel, N. V. (2002). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 124, 1958–1967. Web of Science PubMed CAS Google Scholar
D'Angelo, P., Di Cicco, A., Filipponi, A. & Pavel, N. V. (1993). Phys. Rev. A, 47, 2055–2063. CAS PubMed Google Scholar
D'Angelo, P., Di Nola, A., Filipponi, A., Pavel, N. V. & Roccatano, D. (1994). J. Chem. Phys. 100, 985–994. CAS Google Scholar
D'Angelo, P., Nolting, H.-F. & Pavel, N. V. (1997). Phys. Rev. A, 53, 798–805. CrossRef Web of Science Google Scholar
Dau, H., Dittmer, J., Epple, M., Hanss, J., Kiss, E., Rehder, D., Schulzke, C. & Vilter, H. (1999). FEBS Lett. 457, 237–240. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Dau, H., Liebisch, P. & Haumann, M. (2003). Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 376, 562–583. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Eschle (1897). Z. Physiol. Chem. 23, 30–37. Google Scholar
Farrenkopf, A. M., Dollhopf, M. E., Ni Chadhain, S., Luther, G. W. III & Nealson, K. H. (1997). Mar. Chem. 57, 347–354. CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Feiters, M. C., Klein Gebbink, R. J. M., Solé, V. A., Nolting, H.-F., Karlin, K. D. & Nolte, R. J. M. (1999). Inorg. Chem. 38, 6170–6180. Web of Science CrossRef Google Scholar
George, G. N. & Gorbaty, M. L. (1989). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 111, 3182–3186. CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Greegor, R. B., Pingitore, N. E. Jr & Lytle, F. W. (1997). Science, 275, 1452–1454. CrossRef CAS PubMed Web of Science Google Scholar
Gribble, G. W. (2000). Environ. Sci. Polut. Res. 7, 37–49. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Gurman, S. J., Binsted, N. & Ross, I. (1984). J. Phys. C, 17, 143–151. CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Gurman, S. J., Binsted, N. & Ross, I. (1986). J. Phys. C, 19, 1845–1861. CrossRef Web of Science Google Scholar
Harris, H. H., Pickering, I. J. & George, G. N. (2003). Science, 301, 1203. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Hashimoto, H. & Ishii, T. (2000). Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on X-ray Absorption Fine Structure, Ako, Japan, p. 258. Google Scholar
Hedin, L. & Lundqvist, S. (1969). Solid State Physics, Vol. 23, edited by F. Seitz, D. Turnbull and H. Ehrenreich, pp. 2–181. New York: Academic Press. Google Scholar
Hermes, C., Gilberg, E. & Koch, M. H. J. (1984). Nucl. Instrum. Methods, 222, 207–214. CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Ishii, T. (1997). Fish. Sci. 63, 646–647. CAS Google Scholar
Karlin, K. D., Ghosh, P., Cruse, R. W., Farooq, A., Gultneh, Y., Jacobsen, R. R., Blackburn, N. J., Strange, R. W. & Zubieta, J. (1988). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 110, 6769–6780. CSD CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Koningsberger, D. C. & Prins, R. (1988). Editors. X-ray Absorption. New York: Wiley Interscience. Google Scholar
Küpper, F. C., Schweigert, N., ArGall, E., Legendre, J. M., Vilter, H. & Kloareg, B. (1998). Planta, 207, 163–171. Web of Science CrossRef Google Scholar
Kylin, H. (1929). Hoppe-Seyler's Z. Physiol. Chem. 186, 50–84. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Lee, A., Lin, Z.-Q., Pickering, I. J. & Terry, N. (2001). Planta, 213, 977–980. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Luther, G. W. III, Wu, J. & Cullen, J. B. (1995). Adv. Chem. Ser. 244, 135–155. CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Maeda, M. & Ohtaki, H. (1975). Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn, 48, 3755–3756. CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Mijovilovich, A. & Meyer-Klaucke, W. (2003). J. Synchrotron Rad. 10, 64–69. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Nolting, H.-F. & Hermes, C. (1992). EXPROG. EXAFS Data Reduction Package. EMBL Outstation Hamburg, Germany. Google Scholar
O'Dowd, C. D., Jimenez, J. L., Bahrein, R., Flagan, R. C., Seinfeld, J. H., Hämeri, K., Pirjola, L., Kulmala, M., Jennings, S. G. & Hoffmann, T. (2002). Nature (London), 417, 632–636. Web of Science PubMed CAS Google Scholar
O'Grady, W. E. & Ramaker, D. E. (1998). Electrochim. Acta, 44, 1283–1287. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Pettifer, R. F. & Hermes, C. (1985). J. Appl. Cryst. 18, 404–412. CrossRef CAS Web of Science IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Pickering, I. J., George, G. N., van Fleet-Stalder, V., Chasteen, T. G. & Prince, R. C. (1999). J. Biol. Inorg. Chem. 4, 791–794. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Pickering, I. J., George, G. N., Yu, E. Y., Brune, D. C., Tuschak, C., Overmann, J., Beatty, J. T. & Prince, R. C. (2001). Biochemistry, 40, 8138–8145. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Pickering, I. J., Prince, R. C., Divers, T. & George, G. N. (1998). FEBS Lett. 441, 11–14. CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Rehder, D., Schulzke, C., Dau, H., Meinke, C., Hanss, J. & Epple, M. (2000). J. Inorg. Biochem. 80, 115–121. Web of Science CSD CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Rehr, J. J. & Albers, R. C. (1990). Phys. Rev. B, 41, 8139–8149. CrossRef Web of Science Google Scholar
Rehr, J. J., Zabinsky, S. I., Ankudinov, A. & Albers, R. C. (1995). Physica B, 208/209, 23–26. CrossRef Web of Science Google Scholar
Roche, J. & Yagi, Y. (1952). C. R. Soc. Biol. Paris, 146, 642–645. PubMed CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Rompel, A., Andrews, J. C., Cinco, R. M., Wemple, M. W., Christou, G., Law, N. A., Pecoraro, V. L., Sauer, K., Yachandra, V. K. & Klein, M. P. (1997). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 119, 4465–4470. CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Sprakel, V. S. I., Feiters, M. C., Nolte, R. J. M., Hombergen, P. M. F. M., Groenen, A. & de Haas, H. J. R. (2002). Rev. Sci. Instrum. 73, 2994–2998. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Stern, E. A., Newville, M., Ravel, B., Yacoby, Y. & Haskel, D. (1995). Physica B, 117, 208- 209. Google Scholar
Stosch, H. A. von (1962). Naturwissenschaften, 49, 42–43. CrossRef Google Scholar
Tanida, H., Sakane, H. & Watanabe, I. (1994). J. Chem. Soc. Dalton Trans. pp. 2321–2326. CrossRef Web of Science Google Scholar
Tanida, H. & Watanabe, I. (2000). Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn, 73, 2747–2752. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Thiele, G. & Putzas, D (1984). Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 519, 217–224. CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Von Barth, U. & Hedin, L. (1972). J. Phys. C, 5, 1629–1642. CAS Google Scholar
Wende, H. & Baberschke, K. (1999). J. Electron Spectrosc. Relat. Phenom. 101/103, 821–826. Web of Science CrossRef Google Scholar
Wever, R., Tromp, M. G. M., Krenn, B. E., Marjani, A. & van Tol, M. (1991). Environ. Sci. Technol. 25, 446–449. CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Wong, G. T. F., Piumsomboon, A. U. & Dunstan, W. M. (2002). Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 237, 27–39. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Woolery, M. L. & Lewin, R. A. (1973). Phycologia, 12, 131–138. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
© International Union of Crystallography. Prior permission is not required to reproduce short quotations, tables and figures from this article, provided the original authors and source are cited. For more information, click here.