research papers
Performance of the atomic and molecular physics beamline at the National Synchrotron Radiation Laboratory
aNational Synchrotron Radiation Laboratory, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230029, People's Republic of China, and bEnvironment Spectroscopy Laboratory, Anhui Institute of Optics and Fine Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hefei 230031, People's Republic of China
*Correspondence e-mail: lssheng@ustc.edu.cn
At the National Synchrotron Radiation Laboratory, The University of Science and Technology of China, an atomic and molecular physics beamline with an energy range of 7.5–124 eV has been constructed for studying the spectroscopy and dynamics of atoms, molecules and clusters. The undulator-based beamline, with a high-resolution spherical-grating monochromator (SGM), is connected to the atomic and molecular physics end-station. This end-station includes a main experimental chamber for 12 photons s−1 and a high is provided by this SGM beamline in the energy range 7.5–124 eV. The size of the synchrotron radiation beam spot at the sample is about 0.5 mm in the vertical direction and 1.0 mm in the horizontal direction. Some experimental results of efficiency spectroscopy and photoabsorption spectroscopy of atoms and molecules are also reported.
studies and an additional multi-stage chamber for photoabsorption spectroscopy. A mid-photon of 5 × 10Keywords: undulator-based beamline; atomic and molecular physics.
1. Introduction
Since the 1980s, synchrotron radiation has been used to study the photophysics and et al., 1987; Ng, 2000; Kato et al., 2006). Generally speaking, the ionization energies of most molecules and clusters are in the energy range 8–12 eV, while the photon energy is required to be as high as possible for studying the spectroscopy of atoms. In order to meet the requirements for studying the spectroscopy and dynamics of atoms, molecules and clusters, a new undulator-based spherical-grating monochromator (SGM) beamline has been constructed at the 800 MeV electron storage ring of the National Synchrotron Radiation Laboratory (NSRL) in Hefei, People's Republic of China. The beamline is designed to operate in the 7.5–124 eV photon energy range, covered with three spherical gratings and by using the first, third and fifth harmonic of the undulator inserted in the NSRL storage ring (Zhang et al., 2003; Jia, 2003). This undulator, UD-1 at NSRL, has 29 permanent magnet periods and a 92 mm period length (Jia, 2003). The end-station contains the main experimental chamber and an additional multi-stage chamber. The former is used for the study of atoms and molecules, and equipped with a time-of-flight or quadrupole The latter is used for the study of absolute photoabsorption spectroscopy of atoms and molecules.
of atoms, molecules and clusters by and efficiency spectroscopy (KamkeThis paper is structured as follows. Following this introduction a detailed description of the undulator-based SGM beamline and the atomic and molecular physics end-station will be given in §2 and §3, respectively. In §4 the performance of the undulator-based SGM beamline will be presented and the capabilities of the end-station will be illustrated via experimental measurement.
2. The undulator-based SGM beamline
A schematic layout of this beamline is shown in Fig. 1 and the basic parameters of the optical elements are given in Table 1. At first, the synchrotron radiation beam from the undulator is deflected to cylindrical vertical focusing mirrors (CVFMs) by a plane horizontal deflection mirror (PHDM). The CVFM consists of both MVL (for low energy) and MVH (for high energy), which focus the beam onto entrance slits S1L (through a plane mirror ML) and S1H, respectively. Then, the synchrotron radiation beam is diffracted by three interchangeable spherical gratings and passes through a moveable exit slit. Finally, the synchrotron radiation beam is re-focused onto the sample by a toroidal focusing mirror. The choice of cylindrical focusing mirrors facilitates the alignment of the pre-focusing elements (PHDM and CVFM). Under the conditions of the electron storage ring in NSRL, the optical aberrations of a toroidal focusing mirror do not degrade the final image on the sample (typically 0.5 mm vertically and 1 mm horizontally).
|
In our beamline a grazing-incidence SGM is used and its parameters are given by Zhang et al. (2003). Two included angles, 151° and 157°, are employed in this SGM. The former is for the low-energy gratings SG1 (energy range ∼7.5–22.5 eV) and SG2 (energy range ∼15–45 eV), and the latter is for the high-energy grating SG3 (energy range ∼36–124 eV). The exit slit can be moved around 300 mm to keep it in focus over the energy range of the three gratings. The resolution of the three gratings has been calculated by Zhang et al. (2003) using the methods described by Chen (1987). The separate contributions from the primary coma aberration, entrance slit, exit slit and grating figure slope error are shown in Fig. 2. The total calculated resolution is also shown in Fig. 2. The values shown were calculated at an entrance- and exit-slit width of 80 µm for SG1 and SG2, at an entrance-slit width of 120 µm and exit-slit width of 80 µm for SG3, and figure slope error of 0.5 arcsec.
3. End-station
The end-station is composed of a main experimental chamber, an additional multi-stage −1, backed by a 150 l s−1 scroll pump and a 15 l s−1 mechanical pump. The vacuum is ∼2 × 10−5 Pa in the static state and ∼10−2 Pa during experiments. The differential chamber is pumped by a 450 l s−1 turbomolecular pump, backed by a 30 l s−1 scroll pump and a 15 l s−1 mechanical pump. The is connected to the differential chamber of the beamline via a differential tube of diameter 3 mm. The is evacuated by a 1500 l s−1 turbomolecular pump, backed by a 70 l s−1 scroll pump and a 15 l s−1 mechanical pump. The vacuum is ∼1 × 10−5 Pa in the static state and ∼10−4 Pa during experiments.
chamber, control system, data acquisition and processing system. The main experimental chamber includes a beam source chamber, a differential chamber and an The beam source chamber is evacuated by a turbomolecular pump with a pumping rate of about 1500 l sThe et al., 1997), which is connected to the main experimental chamber via a differential tube of diameter 3.3 mm and length 60 mm.
studies of atoms, molecules and clusters are performed using the main experimental chamber. The samples are expanded though a nozzle and two skimmers to form a supersonic molecular beam into the Cooled samples in the beam are ionized by monochromatic VUV radiation at 90° in the and the produced ions are detected and analysed by reflection time-of-flight at 90°. The photoabsorption spectroscopy is performed using an additional multi-stage chamber (Qi4. Performances of the SGM
4.1. Energy calibration of the SGM
The photon energy calibration of the monochromator was carried out using the additional multi-stage
chamber and its data acquisition and processing system. In this chamber, synchrotron radiation passes through the gas between the two plates, and the electrons are attracted to one of the plates by a positive bias, while the current from the ions (repelled by the bias) is measured by the other plate using a Keithley picoammeter.Energy calibration of the grating was carried out using the known absorption lines of some rare gas atoms and some diatomic molecules; for example, five spectral lines at 21.565 (Ne), 18.355 (N2), 15.760 (Ar), 14.000 (Kr) and 12.120 eV (Xe) for grating SG1 (Maeda et al., 1993; Hsu et al., 1996; Dehmer et al., 1984), five spectral lines at 45.544 (Ne), 30.850 (Ar), 28.915 (Ar), 21.565 (Ne) and 15.760 eV (Ar) for grating SG2 (Maeda et al., 1993; Hsu et al., 1996; Schmoranzer et al., 2001; Tseng et al., 1995; Schulz et al., 1996), and five spectral lines at 93.810 (Kr), 91.225 (Kr), 64.816 (He), 52.474 (Ne) and 45.544 eV (Ne) for grating SG3 (Schulz et al., 1996; Domke et al., 1992, 1996). In the process of energy calibration the widths of the entrance and exit slits is adjusted to 80 µm and the zero-order position of the grating is determined. Then, according to those absorption peaks mentioned above, the relations between wavelength λ and position χ of the grating are determined precisely.
4.2. Energy resolution
The additional multi-stage 2P1/2 ionization threshold is shown in Fig. 3 for 80 µm slit width, 1 meV energy steps and 20 s measurement time. Above the ionization threshold of Ar+ 2P3/2, one Rydberg series converges to the spin–orbit-excited Ar+ 2P1/2. The energy resolution of the SGM with grating SG1 can be determined directly from the line shapes of the Rydberg resonances in Fig. 3. At the 15.9 eV photon energy the resonance line width of 6.0 meV (FWHM) corresponding to a of 2700 was fitted by Gaussian peaks. The energy resolution of the SGM with grating SG2 was also evaluated with the photoabsorption spectrum near the Ar second The study of Ar near the 3s23p6 → 3s13p6np transitions provides a good test for the monochromator resolution since the corresponding absorption transitions have extremely narrow natural line widths. We fitted these peaks with Gaussian peaks. The measured line width of the 3s23p6 → 3s13p68p peak in Fig. 4 was 13.5 meV (FWHM) corresponding to a of 2100 at 28.962 eV photon energy. Fig. 5 shows the spectrum of Kr near the 3d thresholds measured with grating SG3. The fit of the 3d3/2–5p and 3d5/2–6p resonance, with the FWHM of the Lorenzian component set equal to the experimentally determined natural line width of 79.0 meV (Sairanen et al., 1996), gives a value of the width of 102 meV about the 3d5/2–6p resonance. The of grating SG3 is about 900 at 92.615 eV photon energy. Table 2 lists the measured compared with the calculated monochromator resolution.
chamber may also be used to obtain the energy resolution of the SGM experimentally. The photoabsorption spectrum near the4.3. Photon flux
The i produced by the photodiode. The at the sample can be calculated using
of the beamline was measured using an SXUV-100 photodiode (IRD), which was inserted into the synchrotron radiation beam at a distance of 140 mm after the toroidal refocusing mirror. A picoamperometer (Keithley 6485) was used to measure the currentwhere A represents the current of the electron storage ring (in mA), e is the k stands for the product of the transmission for the Au mesh and the fraction of whole beam detected by the photodiode, and α(E) is the number of electrons produced per photon as a function of photon energy. Under our experimental conditions, (1) can be reduced to
The measured output . The peaks close to the results predicted by the theoretical estimation (Zhang et al., 2003).
of the beamline at an entrance- and exit-slit width of 80 µm is shown in Fig. 6At the same time, a synchrotron radiation beam spot size of about 1 mm horizontally and 0.5 mm vertically was obtained via ray-tracing studies, and this is also the beam spot size observed for the zero order of the synchrotron radiation at the sample position.
4.4. Applications of the end-station
A photoabsorption spectrum of toluene recorded using the multi-stage . The photon energy step is 10 meV. The pressure in the absorption cell is about 0.04 torr. The measured of toluene is 8.84 eV, which is in agreement with the data from the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) of USA. The Rydberg series states, converging to B2A′ ionization threshold, are also resolved experimentally. This experimental result for the photoabsorption spectroscopy of toluene is in agreement with the result of Shaw et al. (1998).
chamber is shown in Fig. 7In addition, the . Over the course of the experiment, the photon intensity was detected using a photodiode to normalize the signal of the PIES, and an MgF2 filter was inserted into the beam to eliminate the higher harmonics of synchrotron radiation. The photon energy step is 5 meV and the ion counting time for each point is 10 s. The measured of NO is 9.265 eV and a number of fine auto-ionizing resonant structures are also resolved in the PIES of NO. These resonant structures are assigned to auto-ionizing np and ndδ Rydberg levels which give prominent diffuse absorption bands in the spectrum. These results are comparable with those obtained by Miescher et al. (1978) and Ono et al. (1980).
(PIES) of NO obtained using the home-made reflection is shown in Fig. 85. Conclusion
A new undulator-based atomic and molecular physics beamline has been installed in the 800 MeV electron storage ring at NSRL in USTC. This SGM beamline is designed to have three interchangeable gratings with a photon energy range of 7.5–124 eV and a moveable exit slit, and operated at two fixed included angles. The performances of the SGM beamline and the end-station are evaluated by a series of spectral calibrations and tests. The energy resolution and the
are good enough to meet our design requirements. The end-station is operating well now, and studies of the spectroscopy and dynamics of atoms, molecules and clusters can be performed by detecting photoelectrons, photoions and fluorescence photons. The beamline and the end-station can be used as a modern experimental research platform.Acknowledgements
The authors would like to acknowledge Professor Fei Qi for helpful discussions. They are also grateful to Ming Yin for technical assistance and wish to thank Hui Gao for the vacuum safety system. This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No.10374084).
References
Chen, C. T. (1987). Nucl. Instrum. Methods, A256, 595–604. CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Dehmer, P. M., Miller, P. J. & Chupka, W. A. (1984). J. Chem. Phys. 80, 1030–1038. CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Domke, M., Mandel, T., Puschmann, A., Xue, C., Shirley, D. A. & Kaindl, G. (1992). Rev. Sci. Instrum. 63, 80–89. CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Domke, M., Schulz, K., Remmers, G., Kaindi, G. & Wintgen, D. (1996). Phys. Rev. A, 53, 1424–1438. CrossRef CAS PubMed Web of Science Google Scholar
Hsu, C. W., Lu, K. T., Evans, M., Chen, Y. J., Ng, C. Y. & Heimann, P. (1996). J. Chem. Phys. 105, 3950–3961. CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Jia, Q. K. (2003). High Power Laser Part. Beams, 15, 613–616. Google Scholar
Kamke, B., Kamke, W., Wang, Z., Ruhl, E. & Brutschy, B. (1987). J. Chem. Phys. 86, 2525–2259. CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Kato, M., Morishita, Y., Koike, F., Fritzsche, S., Yamaoka, H., Tamenori, Y., Okada, K., Matsudo, T., Gejo, T., Suzuke, I. H. & Saito, N. (2006). J. Phys. B, 39, 2059–2069. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Maeda, K., Ueda, K. & Ito, K. (1993). J. Phys. B, 26, 1541–1555. CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Miescher, E., Lee, Y. T. & Gürtler, P. (1978). J. Chem. Phys. 68, 2753–2756. CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Ng, C. Y. (2000). Int. J. Mass Spectrom. 200, 357–386. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Ono, Y., Linn, S. H., Prest, H. F., Ng, C. Y. & Miescher, E. (1980). J. Chem. Phys. 73, 4855–4861. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Qi, F., Yang, X., Yang, S. H., Liu, F. Y., Sheng, L. S., Gao, H., Zhang, Y. W. & Yu, S. Q. (1997). J. Chem. Phys. 106, 9474–9482. CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Sairanen, O. P., Kivimaki, A., Nommiste, E., Aksela, H. & Aksela, S. (1996). Phys. Rev. A, 54, 2834–2839. CrossRef CAS PubMed Web of Science Google Scholar
Schmoranzer, H., Lauuer, S., Liebel, H., Ehresmann, A., Demekhin, P. V., Lagutin, B. M., Petrov, I. D. & Sukhorukov, V. L. (2001). J. Electron. Spectrosc. Relat. Phenom. 114–116, 135–140. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Schulz, K., Domke, M., Puttner, R., Gutiérrez, A. & Kaindl, G. (1996). Phys. Rev. A, 54, 3095–3112. CrossRef CAS PubMed Web of Science Google Scholar
Shaw, D. A., Holland, D. M. P., MacDonald, M. A., Hayes, M. A., Shpinkova, L. G., Rennie, E. E., Johnson, C. A. F., Parker, J. E. & von Niessen, W. (1998). Chem. Phys. 230, 97–116. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Tseng, P. C., Lin, H. J., Chung, S. C. Chen, C. I., Lin, H. F., Dann, T. E., Song, Y. F., Hsieh, T. F., Tsang, K. L. & Chang, C. N. (1995). Rev. Sci. Instrum. 66, 1658–1660. CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Zhang, Y. W., Sheng, L. S., Gao, H. & Zhang, G. B. (2003). Nucl. Tech. 26, 489–493. Google Scholar
© International Union of Crystallography. Prior permission is not required to reproduce short quotations, tables and figures from this article, provided the original authors and source are cited. For more information, click here.