diffraction structural biology
Crystal
of human MD-2 recognizing endotoxin cores of lipopolysaccharideaGraduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan
*Correspondence e-mail: satowy@mol.f.u-tokyo.ac.jp
mmm, and diffraction intensities from these crystals indicate crystal The crystal consists of two different domains, A and B. The cA axis of domain A coincides with the cB axis of domain B with a smaller lattice, and the aA axis corresponds to the (aB + bB) axis. This severely imposes difficulty in Through optimization of cryoprotectant, domain A was thoroughly transformed into domain B. The crystal containing only domain B is in P41212 with one MD-2 molecule in the The structure of this form of MD-2 as well as its complex with antiendotoxic lipid IVa was successfully determined using the multiple method.
of crystals causes overlapping of two or more points, and hence structure amplitudes for a single crystalline domain are hardly obtained from X-ray diffraction intensities. MD-2 protein forms a stable complex with Toll-like receptor 4 and recognizes bacterial lipopolysaccharide (LPS). Excessive immune responses activated by LPS cause septic shocks. Saccharide-trimmed human MD-2 crystallizes in the tetragonal form with apparent Laue symmetry of 4/Keywords: crystal twinning; innate immunity; endotoxin.
1. Introduction
Crystal ). phasing requires accurate measurement of intensities from native and heavy-atom derivative crystals. Non-isomorphism often observed in twinned crystals involves different fractions and makes it difficult to estimate accurate heavy-atom contribution. When the fraction in a hemihedrally twinned crystal is not so high and the relative orientation between the twinned domains is known, detwinning procedures are applicable in some cases but introduce additional errors into the detwinned data (Yeates, 1997).
is one of the most serious obstacles to Two or more points of a twinned crystal overlap and hence structure amplitudes for a single crystalline domain are hardly obtained accurately (Parsons, 2003Human MD-2 is a 160 amino-acid glycoprotein with a 16 amino-acid secretion signal and two N-linked glycosylation sites (Gangloff & Gay, 2004). Secreted MD-2 forms a stable complex with Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) on the cell surface, and the complex recognizes lipopolysaccharide (LPS), also known as endotoxin, from gram-negative bacteria, leading to activation of innate immune responses (Nagai et al., 2002; Poltorak et al., 1998). Excessive responses against LPS frequently cause septic shocks, and hence MD-2 has been a therapeutic target (Visintin et al., 2006). Recently, we have determined the crystal structures of human MD-2 itself and of its complex with antiendotoxic lipid IVa (Ohto et al., 2007). The crystals of MD-2 and the complex are almost isomorphous and both show crystal Initial attempts to solve the structures using the twinned crystals failed. Here we report the crystal and transformation into single crystals through optimization of cryoprotectant.
2. Materials and methods
2.1. Sample preparation
Details of protein expression, purification and crystallization have been described previously (Ohto et al., 2007). In brief, human MD-2 was expressed in methyltropic yeast Pichia pastoris, and its monomeric form was purified to through steps of and N-linked saccharide trimming which leaves one N-acetylglucosamine at each glycosylation site. Crystallization was performed using the hanging-drop vapor-diffusion method, and crystals of MD-2 itself and of the complex with lipid IVa were obtained.
2.2. Data collection and analyses of the data
Diffraction data sets were collected at 100 K on BL38B1 of SPring-8, Hyogo, Japan, using a Jupiter 210 CCD detector (Rigaku, Tokyo, Japan), and also by use of Cu Kα radiation from an in-house rotating-anode generator (MacScience, Tokyo, Japan) equipped with an R-AXIS IV detector (Rigaku, Tokyo, Japan). The data sets were processed using the HKL2000 package (Otwinowski & Minor, 1997). Analyses of diffraction intensities were carried out using TRUNCATE of the CCP4 suit (Collaborative Computational Project, Number 4, 1994). Detwinning was performed using DETWIN (Taylor & Leslie, 1998), and was performed using MOLREP (Vagin & Teplyakov, 1997).
3. Results and discussion
3.1. Analyses of twinned crystals
In the initial stage of data collection, crystals were transferred to a harvesting mother solution of 25% PEG 8000, 0.2 M Na-acetate, 0.1 M NaCl, 0.1 M Na-cacodylate pH 6.3, and then cryoprotected by the mother solution with addition of 10% glycerol. These crystals are called form 1 and a typical diffraction pattern is shown in Fig. 1(a). Diffraction intensities from this form 1 crystal showed apparent Laue symmetry of 4/mmm and cell parameters of a = 75 Å and c = 112 Å. Odd h numbered (h00) reflections showed weaker intensities than even h reflections, and intensity ratios of these reflections varied considerably among crystals. Reflections (00l) with l ≠ 4n (where n is an integer) were also observed, as were variations in intensity ratios. Because of this unusual property of diffraction patterns, the could not be determined definitely at this stage. Assuming that the is either P41 or P41212, or its an contains four or two MD-2 molecules, respectively. In either case the Matthews coefficient (Matthews, 1968) corresponds to 2.3 Å3 Da−1 with a solvent content of 0.56.
We examined intensity statistics to detect crystal a). The curves appear lower than the expected theoretical curves for single-crystal data for both centric and acentric reflections, and show sigmoidal properties which are typical of twinned crystals (Dauter, 2003). The values of the second moments of intensity (Fig. 2b) also suggest that the form 1 crystal is twinned. The mean value of the second moment of intensity is 1.77, while the expected values for a perfectly twinned crystal and for an untwinned one are 1.5 and 2.0, respectively (Dauter, 2003).
The curves for cumulative intensity distributions of the form 1 crystals are shown in Fig. 2(Attempts to solve the structure with the twinned data by use of the multiple ). Assuming that two domains in 4 are related by twofold rotation along the a axis, apparent Laue symmetry of 4/mmm was explainable. However, detwinning with this assumption resulted in almost perfect with fractions close to 0.5. This perfect was inconsistent with unusual systematic and obvious deviations from 4/mmm symmetry in the diffraction pattern. Hence, detwinning was unsuccessful. Finally, after the crystal transformation followed by the of the transformed crystal, we judged that the form 1 crystal consisted of two different domains: domain A with the above-mentioned lattice constants and domain B with a smaller lattice as described below.
(MIR) method failed in all of the probable space groups, and poor isomorphism among native crystals became apparent. The poor isomorphism presumably originated from differences in fractions. Detwinning procedures seemed applicable although the procedures require fractions not close to 0.5 and also operators relating two domains (Yeates, 19973.2. Transformation into single crystals
The form 1 crystals were reproducibly transformed into single crystals by soaking in a cryoprotectant solution at 277 K for one day. The optimum cryoprotectant contained 20% 2,3-butanediol instead of the 10% glycerol used previously. The resultant diffraction pattern is shown in Fig. 1(b), which is in almost the same crystal orientation as in Fig. 1(a). Reflections with h = 2n + 1 in the (h0l) zone in Fig. 1(a) disappeared in Fig. 1(b). The of this transformed crystal (form 2) was determined as P41212 from Laue symmetry of 4/mmm and obvious systematic along the axial directions. Lattice parameters for this crystal are a = 53 Å and c = 112 Å. An contains one MD-2 molecule, and the Matthews coefficient (Matthews, 1968) is 2.3 Å3 Da−1, which corresponds to a solvent content of 0.56. This value is identical to that for the twinned crystal (form 1). A lattice conversion by cryoprotectant has been reported for the orthorhombic form of a single crystal of actin (Govindasamy et al., 2004). In that case the lattice parameters of the transformed crystal shrank by about 20% along the c axis.
The cumulative intensity distribution curves and the values of the second moments of intensity for the form 2 crystal are shown in Figs. 2(c) and 2(d). The curves are well fitted to the theoretical curves expected for single-crystal data, and the mean value of the second moment is 2.21. These suggest that the form 2 crystal is not twinned.
Using the data from the transformed crystals, determination of the structure of MD-2 using the MIR method was straightforward (Ohto et al., 2007). The crystals of the lipid IVa complex were obtained under slightly different crystallization conditions and found to be isomorphous to the MD-2 crystals. They exhibited the same and were similarly transformed into single crystals. The structure of the lipid IVa complex was solved using the method using the native MD-2 structure as a search model.
Fig. 3 shows schematic representations of the two different lattices of the MD-2 crystals viewed along the c axis. The initially obtained form 1 crystal (Fig. 3a) is a mixture of domain A with the lattice constants of form 1, and domain B with those of form 2, and hence shows properties in the intensity statistics as shown in Figs. 2(a) and 2(b). The cA axis of domain A coincides with the cB axis of domain B, and the aA axis corresponds to the (aB + bB) axis. This peculiar lattice configuration causes perfect overlaps of reflections from two domains. When soaked in the optimized cryoprotectant, domain A was supposed to be thoroughly transformed into domain B.
Packing of MD-2 molecules in a P41 lattice of form 1 was determined using the method using the observed data set up to 3.0 Å resolution, with the refined MD-2 structure as a search model, and is shown in Fig. 4. Four MD-2 molecules consisting of two pairs of dimers were contained in an The twofold axis of (NCS) is parallel to the aA axis and relates a pair of MD-2 molecules. Two pairs are related by a diagonal translation of (0.5, 0.5, 0). The crystallographic twofold screw axis parallel to the cA axis in domain A therefore mimics the fourfold screw axis, and this enables the lattice conversion of domain A to domain B. The NCS twofold axis in domain A corresponds to the crystallographic twofold axis in domain B, which is diagonal between the aB and bB axes.
The diffraction patterns and intensity statistics of the form 1 crystal suggested c axis. Furthermore, the packing of MD-2 molecules in form 1 corresponded well to that of form 2. Based on these findings, we conclude that the form 1 crystal consists of domains A and B. Since the arrangement of MD-2 molecules in form 1 is determined using the data set from twinned crystals which contain contributions from both the domains, subtle structural differences between these forms still remain to be clarified.
of MD-2 crystals. Attempts to detwin the form 1 data indicated almost perfect which suggests the existence of twofold symmetry perpendicular to theAcknowledgements
This work was supported by Japanese Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology Grants-in-Aid and a Protein 3000 grant (YS), and a JSPS scholarship grant (UO).
References
Collaborative Computational Project, Number 4 (1994). Acta Cryst. D50, 760–763. CrossRef IUCr Journals
Dauter, Z. (2003). Acta Cryst. D59, 2004–2016. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals
Gangloff, M. & Gay, N. J. (2004). Trends Biochem. Sci. 29, 294–300. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS
Govindasamy, L., Reutzel, R., Agbandje-McKenna, M. & McKenna, R. (2004). Acta Cryst. D60, 1040–1047. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals
Matthews, B. W. (1968). J. Mol. Biol. 33, 491–497. CrossRef CAS PubMed Web of Science
Nagai, Y., Akashi, S., Nagafuku, M., Ogata, M., Iwakura, Akira, S., Kitamura, T., Kosugi, A., Kimoto, M. & Miyake, K. (2002). Nat. Immunol. 3, 667–672. Web of Science PubMed CAS
Ohto, U., Fukase, K., Miyake, K. & Satow, Y. (2007). Science, 316, 1632–1634. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS
Otwinowski, Z. & Minor, W. (1997). Methods Enzymol. 276, 307–326. CrossRef CAS PubMed Web of Science
Parsons, S. (2003). Acta Cryst. D59, 1995–2003. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals
Poltorak, A. et al. (1998). Science, 282, 2085–2088. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed
Taylor, H. O. & Leslie, A. G. W. (1998). CCP4 Newsl. 35, 9.
Vagin, A. & Teplyakov, A. (1997). J. Appl. Cryst. 30, 1022–1025. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals
Visintin, A., Iliev, D. B., Monks, B. G., Halmen, K. A. & Golenbock, D. T. (2006). Immunobiology, 211, 437–447. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS
Yeates, T. O. (1997). Methods Enzymol. 276, 344–358. CrossRef CAS PubMed Web of Science
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.