- 1. Abbreviations
- 2. Introduction
- 3. Methodological/theoretical advances in data analysis and data reduction
- 4. Progress in identification and expression of metalloproteins
- 5. Data collection: advances in beamlines for BioXAS
- 6. Applications of XAS in bioinorganic chemistry and in biology
- 7. Conclusions
- References
- 1. Abbreviations
- 2. Introduction
- 3. Methodological/theoretical advances in data analysis and data reduction
- 4. Progress in identification and expression of metalloproteins
- 5. Data collection: advances in beamlines for BioXAS
- 6. Applications of XAS in bioinorganic chemistry and in biology
- 7. Conclusions
- References
research papers
Biological X-ray absorption spectroscopy and metalloproteomics
aSynchrotron SOLEIL, BP 48, 91192 Gif-sur-Yvette Cedex, France, and bMolecular Biophysics Group, School of Biological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 7ZB, UK
*Correspondence e-mail: isabella.ascone@synchrotron-soleil.fr
In the past seven years the size of the known protein sequence universe has been rapidly expanding. At present, more then five million entries are included in the UniProtKB/TrEMBL protein database. In this context, a retrospective evaluation of recent X-ray absorption studies is undertaken to assess its potential role in metalloproteomics. Metalloproteomics is the structural and functional characterization of metal-binding proteins. This is a new area of active research which has particular relevance to biology and for which X-ray absorption spectroscopy is ideally suited. In the last three years, biological X-ray absorption spectroscopy (BioXAS) has been included among the techniques used in post-genomics initiatives for metalloprotein characterization. The emphasis of this review is on the progress in BioXAS that has emerged from recent meetings in 2007–2008. Developments required to enable BioXAS studies to better contribute to metalloproteomics throughput are also discussed. Overall, this paper suggests that X-ray absorption spectroscopy could have a higher impact on metalloproteomics, contributing significantly to the understanding of metal site structures and of reaction mechanisms for metalloproteins.
1. Abbreviations
extended X-ray absorption fine structure. XANES: X-ray absorption near-edge structure. NEXAFS: near-edge X-ray absorption fine structure. X-ray absorption fine structure. X-ray absorption spectroscopy. BioXAS: biological X-ray absorption spectroscopy.
2. Introduction
Metal ions are essential for several fundamental biological processes in both eukaryotic and prokaryotic organisms. Metalloproteins are responsible for several metabolic processes, such as biological energy conversion in photosynthesis and respiration, and signalling processes which govern gene expression and regulation (Holm et al., 1996).
Genomes of many organisms have already been sequenced and the number of metalloproteins is at least one-third of the total number of proteins (Lu, 2006). Some authors even indicate a higher percentage, up to 50% (Thomson & Gray, 1998; Strange et al., 2005). Bioinformatics will contribute to refine the accuracy of these estimates (see §2).
Emerging post-genomics areas, involving metal studies, include metallomics and metalloproteomics. Metallomics is a comprehensive analysis of the entirety of metal and metalloid species within a cell or tissue type (Gao et al., 2007). Metallome in phytoplankton and bacteria has been determined: trace metals consisting of transition metals plus zinc are present in a stoichiometric molar formula as follows, Fe1Mn0.3Zn0.26Cu0.03Co0.03Mo0.03 (Barton et al., 2007). Metalloproteomics is the study of a part of the metallome; it is focused on investigating the distributions, structure and function of all metalloproteins in a proteome (Gao et al., 2007). Metalloproteomics has also been defined as the structural and functional characterization of metal-binding proteins and their structural metal-binding moieties (Jakubowski et al., 2004).
BioXAS can play an important role in metalloproteomics. With this technique, scientists can determine both molecular and electronic structural details of metal sites in metalloproteins, biomimetic complexes or other biological systems, giving an insight into
reaction mechanisms.In the last 25 years, X-ray absorption spectroscopy has been used as a powerful tool for local structural and electronic determinations in a large panel of scientific domains. To give a quantitative indication of the scientific activities involving this spectroscopy, we searched the number of publications as a function of time in the ISI Web of Knowledge (WOS database), updated on 26 October 2008. This evaluation clearly depends on the completeness of the database over a long period of time and the panel of journals included in the database. Nevertheless, a trend emerges, especially in the last ten years, where the majority of journals have an electronic version. Fig. 1(a) shows the number of publications using X-ray absorption spectroscopy as a function of time (five-year periods), obtained searching `X-ray absorption' and related keywords (see Abbreviations) within article titles, article keywords and abstracts contained in databases. Figs. 1(a) and 1(b) show an increase in the number of publications as a function of time, in particular for those concerning BioXAS in the January 2003 to December 2007 period.
In spite of the high intrinsic interest of this technique for metalloprotein studies, the number of BioXAS publications has progressed only recently, owing to several limiting factors, many of which have now been overcome.
Three international workshops (BioXAS Study Weekends) have considered the development of this technique in the post-genomic frame (Ascone, Fourme & Hasnain, 2003; Ascone, Fourme et al., 2005). Two special issues of the Journal of Synchrotron Radiation (Volume 10, Part 1, 2003 and Volume 12, Part 1, 2005) related the presentations of the first two meeting, held in Orsay, France, on 30 June–1 July 2001 and on 29–30 June 2003.
One aim of the present review is to give an updated overview of `BioXAS and metalloproteomics' that emerged from the last international workshop held at the Synchrotron-Soleil Facility (France) on 10–11 August 2007 and from the XXI Congress of the International Union of Crystallography at Osaka, Japan, on 23–31 August 2008.
We first present X-ray absorption spectroscopy indicating methodological/theoretical advances in data analysis and data reduction (§3). Progress in identification and expression of metalloproteins (§4) and new experimental set-ups for BioXAS data acquisition at synchrotrons (§5) are described. The last section is dedicated to the recent applications of to a range of important problems in bioinorganic chemistry and in biology (§6).
3. Methodological/theoretical advances in data analysis and data reduction
The increasing rate of BioXAS publications is due to many factors illustrated in this review, one of these being connected to the progress both in the theory and in ab initio codes for calculations of X-ray absorption spectra (Natoli et al., 2003; Rehr, 2006).
An X-ray
is measured when X-rays have sufficient energy to eject one or more core electrons from the absorbing atom. Around this energy value there is an abrupt increase in the the so-called `absorption edge'.X-ray absorption spectra can be roughly divided into three regions with reference to the shows an example of an experimental X-ray For each region, specific procedures and codes to simulate experimental data have been developed.
the pre-edge, near-edge (XANES) and post-edge (EXAFS) regions. Fig. 2The pre-edge region in metal absorption spectra may be simulated to obtain the electronic structure of the metal atom (Joly, 2003). Pre-edge features in ligand absorption spectra (e.g. Cl or S) can be related to the occupation of a and to the covalency of the ligand–metal bond. Readers are referred to a review on this item concerning metalloproteins (Solomon et al., 2005).
The et al., 1981) and more recently (Levina et al., 2005), described details of data analysis. Modern data analysis programs include full multiple-scattering calculations (MS) (Binsted et al., 1992; Di Cicco, 2003; Rehr & Ankudinov, 2003) which complete the more simple single-scattering analysis, widely used previously. MS is important in analysis of protein metal sites, for example the rigid imidazole ring of a histidine ligand gives rise to diagnostic multiple-scattering signals, and MS can also enable three-dimensional modelling of metalloprotein active sites when is combined with protein data.
region has been largely exploited to obtain quantitative information (metal site ligation, bond lengths, coordination number), and many reviews in the literature, in the past (LeeIn contrast with ). Only recently have technical procedures advanced sufficiently to extract quantitative structural information from XANES spectra (Benfatto et al., 2001; Smolentsev & Soldatov, 2007). Methods for XANES quantitative analysis imply the use of an initial model which is rather close to the real structure. Structural parameters (angles and distances) are selected and refined. Initial models can be obtained from a biomimetic complex or from the protein metal site obtained by X-ray diffraction data, even at low resolution. This approach has been used for several protein metal sites, in the solution state or using protein crystals (Arcovito et al., 2007; Marino et al., 2007; Ascone, Nobili et al., 2006).
most analyses of the XANES region have focused on qualitative interpretations (Penner-Hahn, 2005BioXAS studies have specific advantages in exploiting XANES spectra for quantitative determinations, either complementing
analysis or as an alternative. XANES possesses the following characteristics.(i) Spectroscopic features depend on the geometry of the metal site. Experimental data (Penner-Hahn, 2005) and simulations (Benfatto et al., 2001; Smolentsev & Soldatov, 2007) indicate that intensity and position of peaks depend on the number and on the type of ligands. In addition, distance length variations induce modifications in the shape of theoretical XANES spectra, in spite of the same number and type of ligands (Ascone, Nobili et al., 2006; Yalovega et al., 2007). This last fact makes it unlikely that XANES could be routinely used as a `fingerprint' method for rapidly interpreting or identifying coordination sites in `unknown' systems.
(ii) Information on metal electronic structure may be obtained. The energy of the X-ray
varies with the of the absorbing atom; as a first approximation, the edge position shifts toward higher energies upon oxidation. An accurate analysis, taking into account the shift also due to the ligand/coordination changes, indicates the reduction/oxidation of atoms, which can exist in multiple oxidation states.(iii) Sensitivity to second and third atomic shells around the absorber is higher than for
owing to the mean-free-path value for the photoelectron.(iv) The XANES signal is almost two orders of magnitude more intense than the
signal, making it possible to use lower protein concentrations.The most recent theoretical advances are expected to improve XANES interpretation. Up to now, simulation of spectra have been based on multiple-scattering theory to solve the Schrödinger equation, with potentials calculated in the so-called `muffin tin' approximation, which cannot properly describe protein metal sites very often having high anisotropy. New full-potential multiple-scattering schemes (Hatada et al., 2007) will potentially increase the structural and electronic information that may be obtained from examining the low-energy region of the Further advances are expected from the inclusion of electronic correlations in the description of the absorption process (Kruger & Natoli, 2004).
However, additional efforts have to be made to significantly increase the number of groups using
and, particularly, XANES analysis for metalloproteins studies.Data analysis automation is essential for routine BioXAS contributions to metalloproteomics research. One outcome of recent BioXAS meetings is the proposal to develop a `black box' approach for use by an expanding BioXAS community. This approach has been successfully adopted by the community of biocrystallographers who have developed programs with a high level of automatic control for input parameters (physical and chemical) and for program output (structure). This approach facilitates correct usage and removes unnecessary technical obstacles from the non-expert's view. This effort is performed in the frame of Collaborative Computational Project Number 4 (CCP4) and programs are free for academic use. The availability of such highly specialized programs, brought together in a well thought out graphical interface, has also contributed to the exponential growth of the number of structures deposited in the Protein Data Bank. The CCP4 model has inspired similar developments in NMR, and it is suggested that the biological ). The idea is to eliminate or minimize the explicit role of theoretical parameters in the fitting procedures of programs, instead using only structural parameters and making the process more amenable to researchers from outside the physical sciences community. Some progress has already been achieved in the frame of the FEFF project (Rehr & Albers, 2000) with the ab initio mean-free-paths calculations (Sorini et al., 2006) and theoretical X-ray absorption Debye–Waller factors (Vila et al., 2007).
community may pursue similar collaborations (Winn, 20034. Progress in identification and expression of metalloproteins
Sequencing of genomes has increased rapidly in recent years (Grabowski et al., 2007) and the sizes of protein databases increases consequently: in December 2007 the UniProtKB/TrEMBL protein database contained more than five million sequence entries, fivefold more than in 2004 (Apweiler et al., 2004; Bairoch & Apweiler, 2000). At present, the genome of communities of organisms is analyzed to understand their roles and interactions in an ecosystem. In the frame of the Sorcerer II Global Ocean Sampling expedition, microbial communities in water samples have been analyzed and more than six million proteins have been predicted (Yooseph et al., 2007). Many methods to predict metal-binding proteins are based on sequence similarity to known metalloproteins, in particular looking at the amino acids involved in metal binding. Bioinformatics is now able to identify metalloproteins in archaea, bacteria and eukarya (Dupont et al., 2006; Andreini et al., 2006b). Zinc-binding proteins are between 5–6% (bacteria and archaea) and 8.8% (eukaryota) (Andreini et al., 2006b), in particular 10% in the human proteome (Andreini et al., 2006a). The non-heme iron-binding proteins in archaea are on average 7.1% ± 2.1% (Andreini et al., 2007).
If we consider that bioinformatics takes into account only the known binding sequences and that in bacteria the zinc content is about one-quarter of that of iron [stoichiometric molar formula is Fe1Mn0.3Zn0.26Cu0.03Co0.03Mo0.03 (Barton et al., 2007)], the estimated number of metalloproteins in an organism [one-third of the total number of proteins (Lu, 2006)] is a lower limit. Then, it is clear that in the next ten years there will be a growing need for metalloprotein characterization.
The high-throughput production of metalloproteins involves many specific issues (Jenney et al., 2005). These issues include the following.
(i) The accuracy of bioinformatics research in the selection and prediction of suitable targets and hypothetical metalloproteins.
(ii) Obtaining a properly expressed and folded functional protein that contains the correct metal.
(iii) The co-expression of chaperone proteins that are often required for proper folding of the target and/or insertion of the metal atom into the target.
(iv) The choice of a suitable expression system and whether anaerobic purification is necessary.
The provision of high-quality protein in adequate quantities is a prerequisite for BioXAS studies. BioXAS already takes advantage of expression and purification protocols optimized in structural genomics programmes, as for example the case of metalloproteins from the Mycobacterium tuberculosis genome (Hall et al., 2005). The Production Module of the Southeast Collaboratory for Structural Genomics (SECSG) in collaboration with the University of Georgia (USA) has developed a protocol for analyzing recombinant metalloproteins with X-ray absorption spectroscopy for identifying metal centres, especially novel centres with no homologs. Bottlenecks in the pipeline from genome to metalloproteome, allowing determination of metal-site structures, have been discussed in terms of high-throughput X-ray absorption spectroscopy (HTXAS) (Scott et al., 2005). Many of the bottlenecks identified may be overcome by developing automation for several tasks, particularly in the pipeline, including manipulating micro-array samples using robots, and rapid data collection and processing using intelligent decision-making algorithms. The level of automation demanded by HTXAS makes it radically different from the traditional BioXAS approach, which generally uses larger volumes and more concentrated samples with slower data collection and analysis procedures. The Italian structural genomics effort at the Magnetic Resonance Center (CERM) of the University of Florence is focused on metalloproteins. Their methodological approach is based on NMR with X-ray crystallography and X-ray absorption spectroscopy (Arnesano et al., 2006).
A high-throughput method for measuring transition metal content, based on quantitation of et al., 2005).
signals, has been used in the New York Structural GenomiX Research Consortium (Shi5. Data collection: advances in beamlines for BioXAS
BioXAS data acquisitions cannot be performed with laboratory X-ray sources, such as rotating anodes or X-ray tubes, so that synchrotron radiation is the unique source available for such experiments. Owing to the low signal of protein samples, BioXAS applications have high experimental requirements. They need optimized beamlines having intense synchrotron ). Recent technological and methodological advances have strongly increased the potential of to characterize the structure and function of metalloproteins. BioXAS beamlines suitable for metalloproteomics have intense insertion-device or bending-magnet sources on second- or third-generation synchrotrons, respectively, which reduce the data-acquisition time as well as the quantity of the sample. For metalloproteins, which have a low solubility or which form oligomers at concentrations of <50 µM, insertion devices on last-generations synchrotron are required.
stable optics, sensitive fluorescence detectors and specific sample environments (Ascone, Meyer-Klaucke & Murphy, 2003New set-ups also have an impact on the quality of k range {X-ray energy is usually converted to photoelectron wavevector k, which is the inverse photoelectron wavelength, k = [2me(E − E0)/2]1/2}.
data. spectra are typically measured over a limitedSensitive detectors and intense sources have considerably increased the energy range of kmax for metalloproteins studies were between 11 and 14 Å−1. Recent experiments (Rich et al., 1998; Corbett et al., 2005, 2006) on appropriate samples push this limit up to 16–18 Å−1. With the optimization of experimental set-ups (sensitive detectors and more stable sources and optics) allowing lower noise in the data, the kmax value may be increased up to 25 Å−1 as for human sulfite oxidase (Harris et al., 2006). This means that the number of independent data points (given by ∼2ΔkΔR/π) is increased with a positive impact on bond-length resolution and on the number of parameters allowed for fitting.
spectra. In the past decade, typical values ofThe combination of X-ray crystallography and X-ray absorption spectroscopy has proved extremely useful (Hasnain & Hodgson, 1999). The crystallographic phasing methods, namely multiple-wavelength (MAD), require a tunable monochromator as in the case of experiments. Conceptually new experimental set-ups, where both MAD and high-quality data can be collected on the same crystalline sample, were presented during BioXAS 2003. Currently this arrangement is implemented on the Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Laboratory (SSRL) beamline 9-3, a wiggler side-station dedicated to general user biological (Latimer et al., 2005). This beamline includes the developments in automation that have been made for high-throughput crystallography at SSRL (Cohen et al., 2002); this development allows high-throughput measurements. Moreover, measurements can benefit from the plane-polarized nature of the synchrotron radiation beam. spectra of disordered samples (e.g. solutions) have isotropic absorption while single-crystal samples, in which the metal sites are oriented, exhibit distinct dichroism. At the K-edge, N* = 3Ncos2θ, where θ is defined as the angle between the polarization vector and an absorber-scatter vector, N is the and N* is the effective polarization-dependent Sample orientations are chosen to enhance the contribution of specific backscatterers to the spectrum to have a better insight into the structure.
Polarized et al., 2007) and the Mn4Ca cluster within photosystem II (Yano et al., 2006).
has been used to better characterize cyanomet sperm whale myoglobin (ArcovitoIntense sources may photoreduce metallic centres; a number of different methods to control or avoid this have been proposed for protein samples, in solution and lyophilized (Ascone, Meyer-Klaucke & Murphy, 2003; Ascone, Zamponi et al., 2005; Ascone et al., 2000). An assessment of the metalloprotein redox state is impossible to obtain crystallographically, but this can easily be done by also on oriented single crystals (Yano et al., 2005) using recent protein crystallography/BioXAS beamlines. The new beamlines dedicated to high-throughput crystallography at third-generation synchrotron radiation facilities submit samples to very high X-ray Detection and monitoring of this phenomenon by single-crystal during crystallographic experiments, has been suggested (Ascone, Girard et al., 2006; Holton, 2007).
Photoreduction was observed by et al., 2005) and of [Fe2S2]-containing metalloprotein putidaredoxin (Corbett et al., 2007). In both cases the measured at about 100 K decreases for lower temperatures (10 K or 40 K, respectively). Use of liquid-helium-based rather than liquid-nitrogen cooling for metalloprotein crystallography should limit the of sensitive sites (Corbett et al., 2007). As well as using the effects of radiation damage at metal centres during crystallographic data collection can also be followed by in situ optical measurements on metalloprotein crystals (Hough et al., 2008; Ellis et al., 2008). Fig. 3 shows an image of this experimental set-up. These multi-technique experiments have shown that X-ray-induced occurs on a more rapid time scale than that normally required for complete crystallographic data collection and happens long before X-ray damage to the protein crystals leads to loss of diffractive power. For a given metalloprotein, identification of the metal and coordination environment is needed at the same time, and on the same crystal, that crystallographic data are recorded. An intriguing suggestion is to collect complete crystallographic data sets at several energies around the of a metal and use these data to obtain (or reconstruct) the XANES for the metal by refining the energy-dependent factors for each atom (Einsle et al., 2007). Individual sites in multi-metal-containing proteins (e.g. ceruloplasmin) could be picked out and identified in this way. The challenge is to apply the method without radiation damage to the metal site or indeed the protein during the time required for several complete crystal data sets to be collected. Use of rapid data collection methods is essential here.
in crystals of photosystem II (YanoIn the last study weekend meeting, new beamlines fully or partially dedicated to BioXAS experiments were presented. These are built or are under construction on third-generation synchrotron radiation sources characterized by high
and microfocused beam: Canadian Light Source, Synchrotron-Soleil, Diamond Light Source. Their development has benefited from earlier generations of beamlines that have already contributed significantly to BioXAS research. Some of these beamlines, like those at the SRS Daresbury Laboratory, UK, EMBL Hamburg, Germany, and D21-LURE, France, have ceased operation. Others, like those at Stanford and the X3b beamline at the Brookhaven NSLS, are still active. In order to contribute to metallogenomics, all these beamlines should be equipped with highly specific protein sample environments.The Synchrotron-Soleil Facility (France) has several X-ray absorption beamlines that, in principle, are suitable for BioXAS experiments. SAMBA and LUCIA (Flank et al., 2006) are multipurpose beamlines covering the 5–40 keV and 0.8–8 keV energy range, respectively. The LUCIA micro-source (2 × 2 µm) is suitable for imaging. Most BioXAS experiments are performed at energies higher than 5 keV; LUCIA provides softer X-rays, which probe the local structural and electronic environment of relevant elements for biology (S, Na, Mg, Ca). Such spectroscopic studies on biological systems are quite recent (Akabayov et al., 2005). PROXIMA 1 (Girard et al., 2006) is a Soleil beamline for macromolecular crystallography that will be optimized to combine MAD/SAD and BioXAS measurements on single crystals with X-ray energies in the 5–15 keV range (Ascone, Girard et al., 2006).
At Diamond Light Source (UK) a new beamline (ID20) is under construction. It is optimized for operation between 4 and 35 keV based upon a multipole wiggler source. This versatile X-ray spectrometer will be dedicated to ultra-dilute systems, including biological samples (https://www.diamond.ac.uk/default.htm ).
A phase III beamline project has been approved (in 2006) at the Canadian Light Source (https://www.lightsource.ca/ ). It is focused on a suite of two beamlines (BioXAS-1 and BioXAS-2) specifically optimized for biological and health-related studies. BioXAS-1 is a spectroscopic set-up operating in the 5–28 keV energy range while BioXAS-2 will be dedicated to imaging (5–15 keV). The imaging scale varies from 50 µm to less then 1 µm for investigation of tissues and sub-cellular regions.
6. Applications of in bioinorganic chemistry and in biology
This section illustrates recent studies in which BioXAS has contributed to the understanding of biological issues, providing structural and electronic details during protein function. The majority of these studies have been on protein solutions, usually at liquid-nitrogen or liquid-helium temperatures. The interest in combining BioXAS with crystallography and applications using polarized single-crystal experiments are highlighted. This is not an exhaustive review of all recent absorption studies; it intends to show, focusing on some biological process (e.g. metal trafficking in the cell, substrate interactions with protein metal site and catalytic), that this spectroscopy is an appropriate tool for metalloproteomics.
6.1. Accurate structural determinations of metal sites combining BioXAS and X-ray diffraction
There is an increasing number of higher/atomic resolution structures reported in the Protein Data Bank. However, of some 250 structures of Cu-containing proteins, about 2% reported at better than 1.2 Å resolution and 90% of structures had a resolution lower than 1.5 Å (Strange et al., 2005). An understanding of the complex biological processes at the molecular level requires an atomic resolution that increases the quality of electron density maps revealing details of the metal site. measurements are used to determine the metal–ligand distances with greater accuracy than is usually possible crystallographically owing to the limited resolution. Crystallographic coordinates have been used to fit data, refining models of complex clusters, as for the FeMo co-factor site in Kp1 nitrogenase (Strange et al., 2003) or the FeMo co-factor precursor bound to NifEN protein (Corbett et al., 2006).
Even when an atomic crystallographic structure is obtained, an unwanted metal may be bound to the metal site requiring an et al., 2007).
study. For example, the periplasmic copper/silver-binding protein (CusF) was characterized by crystallography at 1.0 Å resolution but crystals of Cu(I)-loaded CusF had not been obtained. By combining and diffraction data, an unusual metal coordination for both Cu(I) and Ag(I) complexes was determined (LoftinXAS spectroscopy is particularly appropriate when the metal is bound to flexible protein regions, or to chain termini metal-sites that are disordered or are determined with low accuracy. This can be illustrated by the example of the viral non-structural proteins (NS3) for which crystallographic structures show a Zn binding site with high temperature factors (Di Marco et al., 2000; Yao et al., 1999). In this case, the information obtained by protein X-ray diffraction has been used to refine distances, fitting XANES spectra with MXAS software. This kind of analysis, performed on the protein in solution (Ascone, Nobili et al., 2006), takes advantage of the fact that XANES spectra are poorly sensitive to the Debye–Waller factors (Rehr & Albers, 2000). The type and numbers of amino acids which coordinate the metal are known by protein crystallography, and a rigid-body of metal/amino acids distances is performed, reducing the number of fitting parameters.
6.2. BioXAS contribution to the understanding of catalytic processes
Catalytic processes controlled by metalloenzymes which have fundamental and technological relevance can be investigated. One of the objectives of biochemists and chemists is to better understand factors that modulate metalloproteins activity in order to develop metalloenzymes with novel structures and functions (Lu, 2006). This approach has an impact on biocatalysis and biosensor technology, such as in the degradation of pollutants and biomass, and in drug and food processing (Maglio et al., 2007).
A survey of the reactivity associated with nitroxyl (HNO or NO−), the reduced form of nitric oxide (NO), has been reported (Farmer & Sulc, 2005). X-ray absorption spectroscopy has contributed with other techniques, such as H-1 NMR and resonance Raman, to the characterization of the coordination chemistry of the nitroxyl ligand with hemes and synthetic coordination complexes.
Reactive intermediates have been trapped using rapid-freeze-quench of samples at various stages along a reaction pathway. This procedure allowed the investigation of the zinc active site in bacterial alcohol dehydrogenase during single substrate turnover, with reaction times varying from 2 ms to 110 ms (Kleifeld et al., 2003).
Transmembrane proteins are important cellular components performing several crucial functions for the cell as receptors or transporters of molecules and ions. Owing to their physiological relevance they are of considerable interest to the pharmaceutical industry as a target for drugs. Three-dimensional structures of transmembrane proteins at the atomic level remain a particular challenge for crystallography (often they are insoluble and then difficult to crystallize) and for NMR (protein size limits the structural et al., 2007).
step) (LacapereFor BioXAS studies, membrane metalloproteins are excellent candidates, as membranes may be ordered in one dimension (z), where the z axis is collinear with the membrane normal, and the x and y axes remain disordered. This approach, enhancing the contribution of specific backscatterers, has been used to characterize the Mn4Ca cluster in plant photosystem II membranes (Pushkar et al., 2007). measurements with quantum mechanics/molecular mechanics data provided structural models of catalytic water oxidation in photosystem II (Dau et al., 2001; Sproviero et al., 2007). A new model for the Mn4Ca cluster has been proposed through coupling of X-ray diffraction and single-crystal (Yano et al., 2006). Solution XANES combined with crystallographic data may allow structural models of catalysis to be revealed better than the alone, a recent example being the nucleophilic attack mechanism proposed for degradation of histidine at the Zn site of imidazoloneproprionase (Yang et al., 2008). Furthermore, structural parameters obtained by simulations of XANES solution spectra may be used to restrain metal sites during of crystal structures (Strange et al., 2003). In both applications, improvements in the local (metal site) accuracy and precision of the are obtained that can aid interpretation of ligand binding and catalysis.
6.3. Metal trafficking
Environments that contain large amounts of heavy metals (e.g. mercury, copper, cadmium or lead) may be toxic to living organisms at certain concentrations or inappropriate oxidation states. Nevertheless, they are essential, in small quantities, for protein structure and function. Opella and co-workers (Opella et al., 2002) have reviewed the structural biology of proteins which sequester and transport metals, showing that X-ray absorption is appropriate for the investigation of protein-mediated mechanisms in heavy-metal homeostasis. Further research is required to enhance the knowledge on transfer mechanisms of metal ions between proteins.
Organisms have developed specific systems to control metal trafficking in order to maintain the homeostatic balance of intracellular copper. X-ray absorption has contributed with other techniques (Banci et al., 2005) to the elucidation of the copper–protein interaction (Arnesano et al., 2003; Pufahl et al., 1997; DiDonato et al., 2000).
The metal sites of ferric uptake regulator (Fur) from P. aeruginosa have been investigated in solution and in the crystalline state by and crystallography, respectively (Pohl et al., 2003).
Toxicity associated with childhood lead poisoning may be attributable to interactions of Pb(II) with proteins containing thiol-rich structural zinc-binding sites. Lead toxicity stems from its ability to mimic Zn, interfering for example with the essential enzyme, aminolevulinic acid dehydratase (ALAD). Lead containing ALAD structure has been determined by crystallography (Erskine et al., 2000). structural studies of Pb(II)/Zn indicated that the Pb(II) coordination sphere is significantly different from that of Zn(II) bound to the same providing models for protein sites and critical insights into the mechanism by which lead alters the protein activity (Magyar et al., 2005).
6.4. Micro-XAS and imaging
There is a panel of analytical techniques, including et al., 2006).
for biological trace-element imaging, and identification/quantification of chemical species in the biological environment (LobinskiThe speciation and distribution of heavy metal within leaves of plants has been considered in order to understand their metal biochemistry and to select species for specific functions. X-ray absorption spectroscopy and in vivo the hyper accumulator Iberis intermedia, capable of accumulating expensive metal-like thallium (Scheckel et al., 2004), and fern Pteris vittata, which accumulates unusually high levels of arsenic (Pickering et al., 2006). Accumulation of selenium in A. bisulcatus plant (Pickering et al., 2003) and caesium distribution in Arabidopsis thaliana (Isaure et al., 2006) plant have also been considered. Plants accumulating toxic metals are useful for phytoremediating contaminated sites.
imaging were used to examineThe distribution of chromium and endogenous elements within A549 human lung adenocarcinoma epithelial cells, following treatment with Cr(VI), was studied by micro-XAS. Chromium oxidation states have been determined in cells (Harris et al., 2005). Micro-XANES under cryogenic conditions at subcellular levels has already been experimented at ESRF (Bacquart et al., 2007). The distribution of elements was determined in primary invasive ductal carcinoma of breast (Farquharson et al., 2008) and in colorectal liver metastases (Gurusamy et al., 2008).
The chemical form of mercury in fish intended for human consumption has also been determined (Harris et al., 2004).
The impact of a model water dispersion of nanoparticles (7 nm CeO2 oxide) on Gram-negative bacteria has been studied, defining the conditions for which contact is lethal (Thill et al., 2006).
It is now possible, using intense third-generation synchrotrons like that of the APS at Argonne, to produce extremely intense X-ray beams with a submicrometre beam size (0.25 µm). et al., 2006). An original experimental set-up was developed at ESRF (Grenoble) to perform imaging with a 90 nm spatial resolution (Ortega et al., 2007). This enables imaging in subcellular compartments (Bohic et al., 2008).
maps of thin sections of human ovarian cancer cells treated with anti-cancer active complexes containing platinum have been collected localizing platinum in the cell nucleus (Hall7. Conclusions
The studies described in this review show that BioXAS is a flexible technique where biological samples can be studied in a variety of forms, including oriented single protein crystals, disoriented microcrystals, frozen or room-temperature solutions and proteins inserted in membranes. Experimentally, BioXAS is now relatively straightforward to perform at dedicated synchrotron radiation beamlines and, using current analytical tools, is capable of providing key insights into the electronic states and atomic structures of metalloproteins, localized to the metal site at ultra-high resolution. We have pointed out a need for further development of the analytical tools towards a more unified, user-friendly and expert-free implementation, along the lines of collaborative programmes like CCP4 that have proved so successful for protein crystallography.
In the context of metalloproteomics where a large amount of proteins will be expressed, BioXAS is expected to give a valuable contribution to our understanding and knowledge of metalloproteins.
References
Akabayov, B., Doonan, C. J., Pickering, I. J., George, G. N. & Sagi, I. (2005). J. Synchrotron Rad. 12, 392–401. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Andreini, C., Banci, L., Bertini, I., Elmi, S. & Rosato, A. (2007). Proteins, 67, 317–324. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Andreini, C., Banci, L., Bertini, I. & Rosato, A. (2006a). J. Proteome Res. 5, 196–201. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Andreini, C., Banci, L., Bertini, I. & Rosato, A. (2006b). J. Proteome Res. 5, 3173–3178. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Apweiler, R. et al. (2004). Nucl. Acids Res. 32, D115–119. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Arcovito, A., Benfatto, M., Cianci, M., Hasnain, S. S., Nienhaus, K., Nienhaus, G. U., Savino, C., Strange, R. W., Vallone, B. & Della Longa, S. (2007). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 104, 6211–6216. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Arnesano, F., Banci, L., Bertini, I., Capozzi, F., Ciofi-Baffoni, S., Ciurli, S., Luchinat, C., Mangani, S., Rosato, A., Turano, P. & Viezzoli, M. S. (2006). Coord. Chem. Rev. 250, 1419–1450. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Arnesano, F., Banci, L., Bertini, I., Mangani, S. & Thompsett, A. R. (2003). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 100, 3814–3819. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Ascone, I., Fourme, R., Hasnain, S. & Hodgson, K. (2005). J. Synchrotron Rad. 12, 1–3. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Ascone, I., Fourme, R. & Hasnain, S. S. (2003). J. Synchrotron Rad. 10, 1–3. Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Ascone, I., Girard, E., Gourhant, P., Legrand, P., Roudenko, O., Roussier, L. & Thompson, A. W. (2006). 13th International Conference on X-ray Absorption Fine Structure (XAFS13), edited by B. Hedman & P. Pianetta, pp. 872–874. New York: American Institute of Physics. Google Scholar
Ascone, I., Meyer-Klaucke, W. & Murphy, L. (2003). J. Synchrotron Rad. 10, 16–22. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Ascone, I., Nobili, G., Benfatto, M. & Congiu-Castellano, A. (2006). 13th International Conference on X-ray Absorption Fine Structure (XAFS13), edited by B. Hedman & P. Pianetta, pp. 319–321. New York: American Institute of Physics. Google Scholar
Ascone, I., Sabatucci, A., Bubacco, L., Di Muro, P. & Salvato, B. (2000). Eur. Biophys. J. Biophys. Lett. 29, 391–397. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Ascone, I., Zamponi, S., Cognigni, A., Marmocchi, F. & Marassi, R. (2005). Electrochim. Acta, 50, 2437–2443. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Bacquart, T., Deves, G., Carmona, A., Tucoulou, R., Bohic, S. & Ortega, R. (2007). Anal. Chem. 79, 7353–7359. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Bairoch, A. & Apweiler, R. (2000). Nucl. Acids Res. 28, 45–48. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Banci, L., Bertini, I. & Mangani, S. (2005). J. Synchrotron Rad. 12, 94–97. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Barton, L. L., Goulhen, F., Bruschi, M., Woodards, N. A., Plunkett, R. M. & Rietmeijer, F. J. (2007). Biometals, 20, 291–302. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Benfatto, M., Congiu-Castellano, A., Daniele, A. & Della Longa, S. (2001). J. Synchrotron Rad. 8, 267–269. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Binsted, N., Strange, R. W. & Hasnain, S. S. (1992). Biochemistry, 31, 12117–12125. CrossRef PubMed CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Bohic, S., Murphy, K., Paulus, W., Cloetens, P., Salome, M., Susini, J. & Double, K. (2008). Anal. Chem. 80, 9557–9566. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Cohen, A. E., Ellis, P. J., Miller, M. D., Deacon, A. M. & Phizackerley, R. P. (2002). J. Appl. Cryst. 35, 720–726. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Corbett, M. C., Hu, Y., Fay, A. W., Ribbe, M. W., Hedman, B. & Hodgson, K. O. (2006). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 103, 1238–1243. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Corbett, M. C., Latimer, M. J., Poulos, T. L., Sevrioukova, I. F., Hodgson, K. O. & Hedman, B. (2007). Acta Cryst. D63, 951–960. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Corbett, M. C., Tezcan, F. A., Einsle, O., Walton, M. Y., Rees, D. C., Latimer, M. J., Hedman, B. & Hodgson, K. O. (2005). J. Synchrotron Rad. 12, 28–34. CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Dau, H., Iuzzolino, L. & Dittmer, J. (2001). Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 1503, 24–39. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Di Cicco, A. (2003). J. Synchrotron Rad. 10, 46–50. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
DiDonato, M., Hsu, H. F., Narindrasorasak, S., Que, L. Jr & Sarkar, B. (2000). Biochemistry, 39, 1890–1896. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Di Marco, S., Rizzi, M., Volpari, C., Walsh, M. A., Narjes, F., Colarusso, S., De Francesco, R., Matassa, V. G. & Sollazzo, M. (2000). J. Biol. Chem. 275, 7152–7157. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Dupont, C. L., Yang, S., Palenik, B. & Bourne, P. E. (2006). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 103, 17822–17827. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Einsle, O., Andrade, S. L. A., Dobbek, H., Meyer, J. & Rees, D. C. (2007). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 129, 2210–2211. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Ellis, M. J., Buffey, S. G., Hough, M. A. & Hasnain, S. S. (2008). J. Synchrotron Rad. 15, 433–439. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Erskine, P. T., Duke, E. M. H., Tickle, I. J., Senior, N. M., Warren, M. J. & Cooper, J. B. (2000). Acta Cryst. D56, 421–430. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Farmer, P. J. & Sulc, F. (2005). J. Inorg. Biochem. 99, 166–184. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Farquharson, M. J., Al-Ebraheem, A., Falkenberg, G., Leek, R., Harris, A. L. & Bradley, D. A. (2008). Phys. Med. Biol. 53, 3023–3037. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Flank, A. M., Cauchon, G., Lagarde, P., Bac, S., Janousch, M., Wetter, R., Dubuisson, J. M., Idir, M., Langlois, F., Moreno, T. & Vantelon, D. (2006). Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. B, 246, 269–274. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Gao, Y. X., Chen, C. Y. & Chai, Z. F. (2007). J. Anal. Atom. Spectrom. 22, 856–866. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Girard, E., Legrand, P., Roudenko, O., Roussier, L., Gourhant, P., Gibelin, J., Dalle, D., Ounsy, M., Thompson, A. W., Svensson, O., Cordier, M.-O., Robin, S., Quiniou, R. & Steyer, J.-P. (2006). Acta Cryst. D62, 12–18. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Grabowski, M., Joachimiak, A., Otwinowski, Z. & Minor, W. (2007). Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 17, 347–353. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Gurusamy, K. S., Farquharson, M. J., Craig, C. & Davidson, B. R. (2008). Biometals, 21, 373–378. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Hall, J. F., Ellis, M. J., Kigawa, T., Yabuki, T., Matsuda, T., Seki, E., Hasnain, S. S. & Yokoyama, S. (2005). J. Synchrotron Rad. 12, 4–7. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Hall, M. D., Alderden, R. A., Zhang, M., Beale, P. J., Cai, Z., Lai, B., Stampfl, A. P. J. & Hambley, T. W. (2006). J. Struct. Biol. 155, 38–44. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Harris, H. H., George, G. N. & Rajagopalan, K. V. (2006). Inorg. Chem. 45, 493–495. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Harris, H. H., Levina, A., Dillon, C. T., Mulyani, I., Lai, B., Cai, Z. H. & Lay, P. A. (2005). J. Biol. Inorg. Chem. 10, 105–118. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Harris, H. H., Pickering, I. J. & George, G. N. (2004). Science, 303, 764–766. CAS Google Scholar
Hasnain, S. S. & Hodgson, K. O. (1999). J. Synchrotron Rad. 6, 852–864. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Hatada, K., Hayakawa, K., Benfatto, M. & Natoli, C. R. (2007). Phys. Rev. B, 76, 060102. Web of Science CrossRef Google Scholar
Holm, R. H., Kennepohl, P. & Solomon, I. (1996). Chem. Rev. 96, 2239–2314. CrossRef PubMed CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Holton, J. M. (2007). J. Synchrotron Rad. 14, 51–72. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Hough, M. A., Antonyuk, S. V., Strange, R. W., Eady, R. R. & Hasnain, S. S. (2008). J. Mol. Biol. 378, 353–361. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Isaure, M. P., Fraysse, A., Deves, G., Le Lay, P., Fayard, B., Susini, J., Bourguignon, J. & Ortega, R. (2006). Biochimie, 88, 1583–1590. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Jakubowski, N., Ryszard, L. & Moens, A. L. (2004). J. Anal. At. Spectrom. 19, 1–4. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Jenney, F. E. Jr, Brereton, P. S., Izumi, M., Poole II, F. L., Shah, C., Sugar, F. J., Lee, H.-S. & Adams, M. W. W. (2005). J. Synchrotron Rad. 12, 8–12. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Joly, Y. (2003). J. Synchrotron Rad. 10, 58–63. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Kleifeld, O., Frenkel, A., Martin, J. M. L. & Sagi, I. (2003). Nat. Struct. Biol. 10, 98–103. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Kruger, P. & Natoli, C. R. (2004). Phys. Rev. B, 70, 245120. Web of Science CrossRef Google Scholar
Lacapere, J.-J., Pebay-Peyroula, E., Neumann, J.-M. & Etchebest, C. (2007). Trends Biochem. Sci. 32, 259–270. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Latimer, M. J., Ito, K., McPhillips, S. E. & Hedman, B. (2005). J. Synchrotron Rad. 12, 23–27. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Lee, P. A., Citrin, P. H., Eisenberger, P. & Kincaid, B. M. (1981). Rev. Mod. Phys. 53, 769. CrossRef Web of Science Google Scholar
Levina, A., Armstrong, R. S. & Lay, P. A. (2005). Coord. Chem. Rev. 249, 141–160. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Lobinski, R., Moulin, C. & Ortega, R. (2006). Biochimie, 88, 1591–1604. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Loftin, I. R., Franke, S., Blackburn, N. J. & McEvoy, M. M. (2007). Protein Sci. 16, 2287–2293. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Lu, Y. (2006). Inorg. Chem. 45, 9930–9940. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Maglio, O., Nastri, F., Martin de Rosales, R. T., Faiella, M., Pavone, V., DeGrado, W. F. & Lombardi, A. (2007). C. R. Chim. 10, 703–720. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Magyar, J. S., Weng, T. C., Stern, C. M., Dye, D. F., Rous, B. W., Payne, J. C., Bridgewater, B. M., Mijovilovich, A., Parkin, G., Zaleski, J. M., Penner-Hahn, J. E. & Godwin, H. A. (2005). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 127, 9495–9505. Web of Science CSD CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Marino, S., Hayakawa, K., Hatada, K., Benfatto, M., Rizzello, A., Maffia, M. & Bubacco, L. (2007). Biophys. J. 93, 2781–2790. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Natoli, C. R., Benfatto, M., Della Longa, S. & Hatada, K. (2003). J. Synchrotron Rad. 10, 26–42. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Opella, S. J., DeSilva, T. M. & Veglia, G. (2002). Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 6, 217–223. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Ortega, R., Cloetens, P., Devos, G., Carmona, A. & Bohic, S. (2007). PLoS ONE, 2, e925. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Penner-Hahn, J. E. (2005). Coord. Chem. Rev. 249, 161–177. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Pickering, I. J., Gumaelius, L., Harris, H. H., Prince, R. C., Hirsch, G., Banks, J. A., Salt, D. E. & George, G. N. (2006). Environ. Sci. Technol. 40, 5010–5014. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Pickering, I. J., Wright, C., Bubner, B., Ellis, D., Persans, M. W., Yu, E. Y., George, G. N., Prince, R. C. & Salt, D. E. (2003). Plant Physiol. 131, 1460–1467. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Pohl, E., Haller, J. C., Mijovilovich, A., Meyer-Klaucke, W., Garman, E. & Vasil, M. L. (2003). Mol. Microbiol. 47, 903–915. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Pufahl, R. A., Singer, C. P., Peariso, K. L., Lin, S. J., Schmidt, P. J., Fahrni, C. J., Culotta, V. C., Penner-Hahn, J. E. & O'Halloran, T. V. (1997). Science, 278, 853–856. CrossRef CAS PubMed Web of Science Google Scholar
Pushkar, Y., Yano, J., Glatzel, P., Messinger, J., Lewis, A., Sauer, K., Bergmann, U. & Yachandra, V. (2007). J. Biol. Chem. 282, 7198–7208. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Rehr, J. J. (2006). Radiat. Phys. Chem. 75, 1547–1558. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Rehr, J. J. & Albers, R. C. (2000). Rev. Mod. Phys. 72, 621. Web of Science CrossRef Google Scholar
Rehr, J. J. & Ankudinov, A. L. (2003). J. Synchrotron Rad. 10, 43–45. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Rich, A. M., Armstrong, R. S., Ellis, P. J. & Lay, P. A. (1998). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 120, 10827–10836. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Scheckel, K. G., Lombi, E., Rock, S. A. & McLaughlin, N. J. (2004). Environ. Sci. Technol. 38, 5095–5100. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Scott, R. A., Shokes, J. E., Cosper, N. J., Jenney, F. E. & Adams, M. W. W. (2005). J. Synchrotron Rad. 12, 19–22. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Shi, W., Zhan, C., Ignatov, A., Manjasetty, B. A., Marinkovic, N., Sullivan, M., Huang, R. & Chance, M. R. (2005). Structure, 13, 1473–1486. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Smolentsev, G. & Soldatov, A. V. (2007). Comput. Mater. Sci. 39, 569–574. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Solomon, E. I., Hedman, B., Hodgson, K. O., Dey, A. & Szilagyi, R. K. (2005). Coord. Chem. Rev. 249, 97–129. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Sorini, A. P., Kas, J. J., Rehr, J. J., Prange, M. P. & Levine, Z. H. (2006). Phys. Rev. B, 74, 165111–165118. Web of Science CrossRef Google Scholar
Sproviero, E. M., Gascon, J. A., McEvoy, J. P., Brudvig, G. W. & Batista, V. S. (2007). Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 17, 173–180. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Strange, R. W., Ellis, M. & Hasnain, S. S. (2005). Coord. Chem. Rev. 249, 197–208. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Strange, R. W., Smith, B. E., Eady, R. R., Lawson, D. & Hasnain, S. S. (2003). J. Synchrotron Rad. 10, 197. Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Thill, A., Zeyons, O., Spalla, O., Chauvat, F., Rose, J., Auffan, M. & Flank, A. M. (2006). Environ. Sci. Technol. 40, 6151–6156. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Thomson, A. J. & Gray, H. B. (1998). Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2, 155–158. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Vila, F. D., Rehr, J. J., Rossner, H. H. & Krappe, H. J. (2007). Phys. Rev. B, 76, 014301. Web of Science CrossRef Google Scholar
Winn, M. D. (2003). J. Synchrotron Rad. 10, 23–25. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Yalovega, G., Smolentsev, G., Soldatov, A., Chan, J. & Stillman, M. (2007). Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A, 575, 162–164. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Yang, F., Chu, W., Yu, M., Wang, Y., Ma, S., Dong, Y. & Wu, Z. (2008). J. Synchrotron Rad. 15, 129–133. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Yano, J., Kern, J., Irrgang, K. D., Latimer, M. J., Bergmann, U., Glatzel, P., Pushkar, Y., Biesiadka, J., Loll, B., Sauer, K., Messinger, J., Zouni, A. & Yachandra, V. K. (2005). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 102, 12047–12052. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Yano, J., Kern, J., Sauer, K., Latimer, M. J., Pushkar, Y., Biesiadka, J., Loll, B., Saenger, W., Messinger, J., Zouni, A. & Yachandra, V. K. (2006). Science, 314, 821–825. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Yao, N., Reichert, P., Taremi, S. S., Prosize, W. W. & Weber, P. C. (1999). Structure, 7, 1353–1363. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Yooseph, S. et al. (2007). PLoS Biol. 5, 432–466. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
© International Union of Crystallography. Prior permission is not required to reproduce short quotations, tables and figures from this article, provided the original authors and source are cited. For more information, click here.