short communications
Temperature dependence of pre-edge features in Ti K-edge XANES spectra for ATiO3 (A = Ca and Sr), A2TiO4 (A = Mg and Fe), TiO2 rutile and TiO2 anatase
aGraduate School of Sciences and Technology, Kumamoto University, 2-39-1 Kurokami, Kumamoto 860-8555, Japan, bMaterials and Structures Laboratory, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Yokohama, Kanagawa 226-850, Japan, cAdvanced Materials Science and Engineering, Yamaguchi University, Ube, Yamaguchi 755-8611, Japan, and dInstitute for Materials Research, Tohoku University, Sendai, Miyagi 980-8577, Japan
*Correspondence e-mail: yoshiasa@sci.kumamoto-u.ac.jp
XANES (X-ray absorption near-edge structure) spectra of the Ti K-edges of ATiO3 (A = Ca and Sr), A2TiO4 (A = Mg and Fe), TiO2 rutile and TiO2 anatase were measured in the temperature range 20–900 K. Ti atoms for all samples were located in TiO6 octahedral sites. The absorption intensity invariant point (AIIP) was found to be between the pre-edge and post-edge. After the AIIP, amplitudes damped due to Debye–Waller factor effects with temperature. Amplitudes in the pre-edge region increased with temperature normally by thermal vibration. Use of the AIIP peak intensity as a standard point enables a quantitative comparison of the intensity of the pre-edge peaks in various titanium compounds over a wide temperature range.
Keywords: pre-edge peak; Ti K-edge; temperature dependence; Ti compounds; absorption intensity invariant point.
1. Introduction
The pre-edge peak structure in K-edge XANES spectra of 3d transition metals is sensitive to the electronic and geometrical structure around the X-ray absorbing central atom (Yamamoto, 2008). Characterization of pre-edge features is useful for understanding materials in the fields of physics, chemistry and earth sciences (Boye et al., 2011; Gomes et al., 2011; Yogi et al., 2011).
Pre-edge peak features of the Ti K-edge have been studied by comparison of XANES spectra of different compositions (Grunes, 1983; Ravel et al., 1993; Ravel & Stern, 1995; Farges et al., 1997). Three obvious pre-edge peaks of six-coordinated titanium oxide are observed in many compounds. When Ti occupies an octahedral coordination site, the five d orbitals are split into t2g and eg orbitals according to the theory. The pre-edge structure of the Ti-K of six-coordinated titanium oxide has long been debated owing to its complicated structure with three peaks (Grunes, 1983; Brydson et al., 1989; Uozumi et al., 1992; Wu et al., 1997; Ankudinov et al., 1998; Vedrinskii et al., 1998; Joly et al., 1999). Joly et al. (1999), by performing polarization XANES spectrum measurement of the rutile-type TiO2 single crystal and calculating by the finite difference method, was successful in reproducing the three pre-edge peaks experimentally. The three pre-edge peaks are usually called A1, A2 and A3 in the order of increasing energy value, with the A3 peak closest to the post-edge energy. The A1 and A3 peaks are assigned to the electric quadrupole and electric dipole transitions, respectively. The A2 peak is a mixture of quadrupole and dipole transitions.
Temperature variations in the intensity of pre-edge peaks have been measured in various titanium compounds (Engel et al., 1987; Durmeyer et al., 1990; Vedrinskii et al., 1997; Nozawa et al., 2005; Sato et al., 2005; Hashimoto et al., 2007; Durmeyer et al., 2010). Hashimoto et al. (2007) measured the Ti K-edge XANES spectra of several titanates (PbTiO3, BaTiO3, SrTiO3, CaTiO3, Mg2TiO4, TiO2 rutile, TiO2 anatase) at various temperatures. However, a sufficient comparative study and detailed interpretation of temperature dependence over a wide temperature range of pre-edge peaks intensity has yet to be conducted in various titanium compounds.
In this paper we present a quantitative experiment for pre-edge peaks in various titanium compounds over a wide temperature range and investigate how the intensity of pre-edge features changes with temperature.
2. Experimental
All specimens [TiO2 rutile (99.999%), TiO2 anatase (99.999%), CaTiO3 perovskite (99.99%), SrTiO3 perovskite (99.99%), Mg2TiO4 spinel (99.99%) and Fe2TiO4 spinel (99.99%)] were commercial chemicals (Furu-uchi Chemical Co. Ltd) and were examined by X-ray diffraction methods. Appropriate amounts of fine-powder sample and boron nitride powder were mixed and pressed into pellets of <0.2 mm in thickness and 10.0 mm in diameter. Adjusting sample content allowed all samples to show edge-jumps of 0.7 (Δμd), where μ is the and d is the sample thickness. spectra near the Ti K-edge were measured in transmission mode at beamlines BL-9C and BL-12C of the Photon Factory in the High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Tsukuba, Japan (PAC No. 2011G611). Synchrotron radiation was monochromated by a Si (111) double-crystal monochromator. X-ray energy calibration was performed by setting the copper metal pre-edge absorption peak to 8978.8 eV. Mirrors were used to eliminate higher harmonics. Details of the measurements are given by Yoshiasa et al. (1997). X-ray absorption measurements in the temperature range 20–900 K were performed under a helium atmosphere.
3. Result and discussion
Fig. 1 and Figs. S1–S51 show Ti K-edge XANES spectra of all samples at various temperatures. In order to clarify the temperature dependence, the difference spectrum between the low-temperature spectra (300 K, 400 K and 500 K) and those at higher temperatures is plotted and shown in the lower portion of each figure. In every case examined an absorption intensity invariant point (AIIP), i.e. an energy point where the intensity does not change with temperature, was observed near each for all samples. Arrows in the figures indicate each AIIP. The spectrum intensity at the AIIP was set as 1.0 by normalizing the spectrum intensity for the samples, and the temperature dependence of the XANES pre-edge peaks among the samples was then compared. The left-hand scale of Fig. 1 and Figs. S1–S5 shows the measured value, while the right-hand scale shows that normalized by the AIIP.
AIIPs, where the intensity does not change with temperature near each
are present in each sample. AIIP-based normalization allows the elimination of errors caused by the reference point itself changing with temperature. This use of AIIPs for normalization is effective when comparing the temperature dependence of the absolute intensity in XANES spectra. XANES amplitudes are clearly seen to damp at energies higher than the AIIP owing to Debye–Waller factor effects with increasing temperature; the line displays the attenuation of a sine curve. Conversely, amplitudes increase with temperature at energies lower than the AIIP.The peak A2 was observed for all compounds, while peak A1 was seen in all compounds with the exception of Fe2TiO4. Figs. 2 and 3 show the temperature dependence of the intensity of pre-edge peak features near A1 and A2 for several samples. The intensity of peaks A1 and A2 for all samples increased linearly with increasing temperature. Table 1 shows the AIIP energy for the compounds and the slopes of peaks A1 and A2 with temperature. Figs. 2 and 3 show that the gradient of the A1 peak intensity with temperature is identical for all compounds, while the gradient of the A2 peak intensity with temperature changes with composition. The rate of increase in the A2 peak intensity for TiO2 anatase and Fe2TiO4 is quite small compared with the rest of the samples. The gradient of the A2 peak intensity for rutile and anatase suggests differences in local structure change with temperature. AIIP-based normalization has proven to be effective in physical-properties research.
|
References
Ankudinov, A. L., Ravel, B., Rehr, J. J. & Conradson, S. D. (1998). Phys. Rev. B, 58, 7565–7576. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Boye, K., Almkvist, G., Nilsson, S. I., Eriksen, J. & Persson, I. (2011). Eur. J. Soil Sci. 62, 874–881. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Brydson, R., Sauer, H., Engel, W., Thomass, J. M., Zeitler, E., Kosugi, N. & Kuroda, H. (1989). J. Phys. Condens. Matter, 1, 797–812. CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Durmeyer, O., Beaurepaire, E., Kappler, J. P., Brouder, Ch. & Baudelet, F. (2010). J. Phys. Condens. Matter, 22, 125504. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Durmeyer, O., Kappler, J. P., Beaurepaire, E., Heintz, J. M. & Drillon, M. (1990). J. Phys. Condens. Matter, 2, 6127–6136. CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Engel, E., Dreizler, R. & Malzacher, P. (1987). J. Phys. Colloq. 48, C2-321–C2-328. Google Scholar
Farges, F., Brown, G. & Rehr, J. (1997). Phys. Rev. B, 56, 1809–1819. CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Gomes, J., Azevedo, G., Depeyrot, J., Mestnik-Filho, J., da Silva, G., Tourinho, F. & Perzynski, R. (2011). J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 323, 1203–1206. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Grunes, L. (1983). Phys. Rev. B, 27, 2111–2131. CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Hashimoto, T., Yoshiasa, A., Okube, M., Okudera, H. & Nakatsuka, A. (2007). AIP Conf. Proc. 882, 428–430. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Joly, Y., Cabaret, D., Renevier, H. & Natoli, C. (1999). Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 2398–2401. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Nozawa, S., Iwazumi, T. & Osawa, H. (2005). Phys. Rev. B, 72, 121101. Web of Science CrossRef Google Scholar
Ravel, B. & Stern, E. A. (1995). Physica B, 316, 208–209. Google Scholar
Ravel, B., Stern, E. A., Yacobi, Y. & Dogan, F. (1993). Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 32, 782–784. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Sato, K., Miyanaga, T., Ikeda, S. & Diop, D. (2005). Phys. Scr. T115, 359–361. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Uozumi, T., Okada, K., Kotani, A., Durmeyer, O., Kappler, J. P., Beaurepaire, E. & Parlebas, J. C. (1992). Eur. Phys. Letter. 18, 85–90. CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Vedrinskii, R. V., Kraizman, V. L., Novakovich, A. A., Demekhin, P. V. & Urazhdin, S. V. (1998). J. Phys. Condens. Matter, 10, 9561–9580. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Vedrinskii, R. V., Kraizman, V. L., Novakovich, A. A., Demekhin, P. V., Urazhdin, S. V., Ravel, B. & Stern, E. (1997). J. Phys. IV, 7, C2-107–C2-110. Google Scholar
Wu, Z. Y., Ouvrard, G., Gressier, P. & Natoli, C. R. (1997). Phys. Rev. B, 55, 10382–10391. CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Yamamoto, T. (2008). X-ray Spectrom. 37, 572–584. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Yogi, C., Kojima, K., Hashishin, T., Wada, N., Inada, Y., Della Gaspera, E., Bersani, M., Martucci, A., Liu, L. & Sham, T. (2011). J. Phys. Chem. C, 115, 6554–6560. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Yoshiasa, A., Koto, K., Maeda, H. & Ishii, T. (1997). Jpn. Appl. Phys. 36, 781–784. CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
© International Union of Crystallography. Prior permission is not required to reproduce short quotations, tables and figures from this article, provided the original authors and source are cited. For more information, click here.