research papers
+ ions irradiation
and XMCD studies of magnetic properties modifications of Pt/Co/Au and Pt/Co/Pt trilayers induced by GaaFaculty of Physics, University of Białystok, Ciołkowskiego 1L, Bialystok 15-245, Poland, bEuropean Synchrotron Radiation Facility, BP 220, F-38043 Grenoble, France, cInstitute of Ion Beam Physics and Materials Research, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, PO Box 510119, Dresden 01314, Germany, and dInstitute of Physics, Polish Academy of Sciences, Al. Lotników 32/46, Warszawa 02-668, Poland
*Correspondence e-mail: jo@uwb.edu.pl
Magnetic and magneto-optical properties of Pt/Co/Au and Pt/Co/Pt trilayers subjected to 30 keV Ga+ ion irradiation are compared. In two-dimensional maps of these properties as a function of cobalt thickness and ion fluence, two branches with perpendicular magnetic anisotropy (PMA) for Pt/Co/Pt trilayers are well distinguished. The replacement of the Pt capping layer with Au results in the two branches still being visible but the in-plane anisotropy for the low-fluence branch is suppressed whereas the high-fluence branch displays PMA. The X-ray absorption spectra and X-ray (XMCD) spectra are discussed and compared with non-irradiated reference samples. The changes of their shapes and peak amplitude, particularly for the high-fluence branch, are related to the modifications of the local environment of Co(Pt) atoms and the etching effects induced by ion irradiation. Additionally, in irradiated trilayers the XMCD measurements at the Pt L2,3-edge reveal an increase of the induced in Pt atoms.
Keywords: magnetic and magneto-optical properties; trilayer; X-ray magnetic circular dichroism (XMCD) spectra; perpendicular magnetic anisotropy.
1. Introduction
Ultrathin magnetic films, multilayered systems and nanostructures with perpendicular magnetic anisotropy (PMA), which consist of alternating magnetic and nonmagnetic layers, attract much attention due to the fundamental research of nanomagnetism and their technological applications in memory, spintronics and magnetic logic devices. Effective magnetic anisotropy is a result of the interplay of magnetocrystalline, magnetoelastic, surface (interface) and shape anisotropy contributions (Chowdhury et al., 2012). In systems containing ultrathin magnetic layers, PMA is often dominated by interfacial anisotropy (Stillrich et al., 2010; Knepper & Yang, 2005). Magnetic anisotropy energy in such structures might exceed the respective value for bulk material by an order of magnitude (Lehnert et al., 2010). The structure and the quality of interfaces are the factors of crucial importance that affect effective anisotropy. For very thin films, PMA can be enhanced by the suppression of interface diffusion (Bandiera et al., 2012) which is responsible for interface mixing (Lee et al., 2013) or by the interface roughness (Schaller et al., 1999). Contributions from the bottom and the upper interfaces to the magnetic anisotropy are not equivalent (Bandiera et al., 2011). Therefore, the resulting anisotropy depends on the fabrication techniques (Lee et al., 2013) and growth conditions such as the type of seed layer (Stillrich et al., 2010) or the growth temperature (Mihai et al., 2013).
Although PMA was discovered in Au/Co multilayers (Chappert & Bruno, 1988), the Pt/Co system is one of the most intensively studied owing to the enhanced magneto-optical response in the ultraviolet range (Brandle et al., 1992). The structure and the interface alloying have significant influence on the magnetic and magneto-optical properties and can be used as adjustment parameters (Poulopoulos et al., 2003). Various other approaches have been considered to further improve the properties relevant to applications, e.g. doping of the interfaces in order to oxidize Co atoms (Zhang, Yang et al., 2013; Zhang, Wu et al., 2013; Manchon et al., 2008; Nistor et al., 2011) or the insertion of ultrathin layers, which are immiscible with both Pt and Co, in order to suppress interdiffusion (Bandiera et al., 2012).
The local environment and the coordination play important roles for the magnetic properties of Co atoms. The enhanced
of Pt(Pd) atoms leads to an effective interlayer exchange coupling in multilayers compared with a system containing smaller spin–orbit coupling like Cr or Cu.The electronic structure of the nonmagnetic components plays an important role in the anisotropy and the coupling between magnetic components of nanostructures exhibiting PMA. In granular Pt/Co multilayers the Co particles are coupled ferromagnetically (Bartolome et al., 2007). The separating Pt layers are involved in the interparticle exchange coupling by polarization of the Pt atoms due to of the Pt 5d and the Co 3d electrons. Oscillatory interlayer coupling between the Co layers is attributed to the Ruderman–Kittel–Kasuya–Yosida interactions. It is concluded that the magnetic polarization of the Pt atoms is responsible for this behavior (Knepper & Yang, 2005).
Local irradiation of the continuous Pt/Co multilayers with an ion beam or focused ion beam (FIB) is a powerful tool for nanostructure fabrication (Chappert et al., 1998; Rettner et al., 2002; Vieu et al., 2002; Kuswik et al., 2011). Ion bombardment destroys a sharp chemical profile at the interfaces in the as-grown layered films. Suppression of PMA followed by reorientation to the in-plane alignment was demonstrated upon irradiation for Pt/Co multilayers with 30 keV He+ ions (Chappert et al., 1998; Fowley et al., 2013). The opposite effects have also been reported very recently (Maziewski et al., 2012; Jaworowicz et al., 2009; Mazalski et al., 2013). The possibility of multiple changes of the magnetization orientation between in-plane and out-of-plane directions in Pt/Co/Pt trilayers induced by ion irradiation has been demonstrated. Consecutive states with PMA separated by an in-plane magnetization phase were induced in in-plane magnetized as-grown trilayers with increasing fluence of ions. In the two-dimensional maps of magnetic and magneto-optical properties as a function of dCo (cobalt thickness) and F (ion fluence), two elongated PMA regions, in shapes resembling `branches', were clearly distinguished (Maziewski et al., 2012). One of the possible explanations for this induced PMA is that Co–Pt intermixing is forced by irradiation and the formation of the Co–Pt ordered alloy proceeds. Such a process was confirmed by Maziewski et al. (2012) and Lišková et al. (2012). Recent studies using the extended X-ray absorption fine-structure (EXAFS) technique revealed that the enhancement of PMA in the moderate Ga+ fluence region was also related to in-plane lattice expansion of the Co film (Sakamaki et al., 2012).
Identification of the roles of surface and of perimeter atoms in Co/Pt structures offers numerous possibilities for the engineering of et al., 1998). Structures with PMA have potential applications in ultrahigh-density perpendicular recording (Stillrich et al., 2010; Richter, 2007), magnetic ratchet memories (Franken et al., 2012; Lambert et al., 2013), magnetic field sensors (Matczak et al., 2012) and controllable transport of magnetic beads (Tierno et al., 2007). Hybrid systems are promising for the electric field control of magnetism in low-power spintronics devices (Lin et al., 2013) or as spin injectors (Zarpellon et al., 2012).
strength and the anisotropy in fabricated nanostructures (ChappertIn the present paper we report the results of magneto-optical and synchrotron radiation studies of magnetic trilayers irradiated with a 30 keV Ga+ ion beam. A comparison of Pt/Co/Au and Pt/Co/Pt trilayers highlights the role of the top layer type in the interface intermixing responsible for the modification of magnetic properties, particularly PMA. The appearance of magnetic moments, owing to proximity effects for the atoms of nonmagnetic layers, is also discussed in detail.
2. Experimental details
Two types of epitaxial structures were grown, at room temperature, by a molecular beam a) cobalt wedge: Pt (20 nm)/Co wedge (0–5 nm)/[Pt (5 nm) or Au (5 nm)] and (b) cobalt flat samples: Pt (20 nm)/Co (3.3 nm)/[Pt (5 nm) or Au (5 nm)]. The deposition process was monitored in situ by and Detailed information on the growth of the samples and orientation of the layers is given by Maziewski et al. (2012). Selection of Au as an alternative top layer should have a significant influence on the irradiation-induced magnetic properties owing to the difference in miscibility between Co/Pt (miscible) and Co/Au (immiscible) systems, and, consequently, their interface mixing under irradiation. The samples with the Co wedge were irradiated with 30 keV Ga+ ions with a fluence varying from 1013 up to 1016 ions cm−2 along a direction orthogonal to the Co wedge thickness gradient, similar to that reported by Maziewski et al. (2012). Thus, the Co wedge sample can be considered as an array of small uniform samples with variable Co thickness and irradiation fluence. After analysis of magnetic properties with a spatially resolved polar magneto-optical Kerr effect (PMOKE) technique, it is possible to present them as two-dimensional maps (dCo, logF) and select fluences F1 and F2 corresponding to the area with induced perpendicular magnetic anisotropy – branches 1 and 2 for a given Co thickness (Maziewski et al., 2012). Further, these fluences, F1 and F2, will be used for uniform irradiation of flat (constant Co thickness) large-area samples suitable for and X-ray (XMCD) study. The samples containing a flat cobalt layer and different capping layers were irradiated with two fluences of F1 = 2.8 × 1014 ions cm−2 (low) and F2 = 5.7 × 1015 ions cm−2 (high) corresponding to the branches 1 and 2 for dCo = 3.3 nm. TRIDYN (Möller et al., 1988) simulations showed that: (a) in both types of sample systems the Ga+ ions penetrate both Co layer interfaces and (b) the estimated etching depth is negligible for fluence F1 and is a few nanometres for fluence F2.
method on sapphire substrates: (Surface morphology was characterized with a commercial (NT-MDT) atomic force microscope (AFM) working in tapping mode at ambient conditions. In the case of a sharp boundary between irradiated and non-irradiated areas it also allows the depth of etching for a given fluence as a step height at the boundary to be measured.
Room-temperature PMOKE rotation hysteresis loops were measured with a magneto-optical set-up equipped with a laser diode (640 nm wavelength) giving a spot size of about 300 µm in diameter. A computer-controlled x–y scanning stage allowed the position of the laser spot on the sample surface to be selected. For a selected position, the PMOKE rotation hysteresis loop is measured sweeping magnetic field applied perpendicular to the sample surface. Analysis of these hysteresis loops enabled the determination of the main magnetic/magneto-optical parameters such as coercivity field, saturation field HSAT, Kerr rotation maximum and zero field (remanence) values etc. The HSAT field is equal to the effective magnetic anisotropy field for the film with in-plane magnetic anisotropy. These parameters maps on the (dCo, logF) plane were built for Co wedge samples (with Pt or Au coverage) irradiated with a fluence gradient, performed in a similar way by Maziewski et al. (2012).
XAS and XMCD spectra measured at the Co K-edge and Pt L2,3 edges were obtained in the fluorescence mode at ID12 beamline of the ESRF, Grenoble. The measurements were performed at room temperature in an applied magnetic field of 0.6 T and in the glancing-incidence configurations (angle between the X-ray beam and the sample normal was equal to 79°). spectra were averaged for two polarizations.
3. Results and discussion
The two-dimensional diagrams created on the basis of the measured PMOKE rotation hysteresis loops highlight the regions of the investigated samples with a specific direction of magnetization. These diagrams for saturation field HSAT for (a) Pt/Co/Pt and (b) Pt/Co/Au trilayers as a function of dCo, logF are presented in Fig. 1; similar to those presented by Maziewski et al. (2012).
The saturation field is defined for the part of the sample where the magnetization is oriented in the sample plane. It is equal to the value of the magnetic field applied in the perpendicular direction at which the magnetization reaches saturation along the field direction. Its value is represented by the color scale in Fig. 1. The part of the sample with perpendicular magnetization is marked in red. In our notation for that case the saturation field approaches to zero. On the right-hand side of Figs. 1(a) and 1(b) the vertical profiles of the saturation field, i.e. as a function of ion fluence, are presented for a fixed Co layer thickness of dCo = 3.3 nm. Contrary to the results obtained for the Pt/Co/Pt trilayer by Maziewski et al. (2012), only the second branch with PMA is well pronounced for Pt/Co/Au while the first one is visible only as a local increase of the saturation field. These differences are related to the various extents of Co mixing in the top Co/Pt and Co/Au interfaces. Also for higher fluences a transition to the superparamagnetic state takes place similar to those in Pt/Co/Pt structures. Moreover, the increase of the PMOKE rotation value under ion irradiation is slightly smaller than that reported by Maziewski et al. (2012). Our results indicate that a contribution of the top Co interface to magnetic changes induced by irradiation is dominant.
The uniform samples (dCo = 3.3 nm) with a Au or a Pt capping layer, irradiated with fluences F1 and F2 corresponding to both branches, were measured using synchrotron radiation techniques. Figs. 2(a)–2(d) show the non-normalized spectra measured at the Co K and the Pt L3 absorption edges, for as-deposited samples and two irradiated ones with fluences F1 and F2. For both systems (Figs. 2a and 2b) the shape of the non-normalized Co K-edge absorption spectra for the as-deposited samples are typical of h.c.p. Co bulk structure (Kozinkin et al., 2011). Upon irradiation the shapes of the spectra change. The features typical of pure metal are much less pronounced. These changes are probably related to the mixing of the layers at the interfaces which forces a modification of the 3d and 4p shells of the Co atoms. The electronic structure of transition metals is very sensitive to changes of their local environment. Abundance of Pt atoms in the nearest vicinity of Co atoms modifies their d and p shells due to with the d-states of Pt atoms. spectra at the Co for irradiated samples resemble those obtained for the reference Co–Pt alloy (Lee et al., 2003).
The shape of the non-normalized L3 platinum also evolve after irradiation, see Figs. 2(c) and 2(d). The changes are slightly smaller than for Co; however, their origin is also related to the orbital This confirms again the presence Co–Pt alloying in the samples irradiated with fluences F1 and F2.
spectra recorded at theThe observed evolution of the amplitude of the (a)–2(b) and Figs. 2(c)–2(d), respectively. The amplitude is proportional to the number of absorbing atoms in the sample. For the non-irradiated sample and the irradiated one with fluence F1 the amplitudes at the Co K-edge (see Fig. 2a) are similar, whereas for the fluence F2 corresponding to branch 2 it drastically decreases. Such a behavior for the high fluence is related to the smaller amount of Co atoms remaining in the sample. Simple comparison between the spectra amplitudes show that the signal for the sample irradiated with the high fluence is about 45% less (1.8 times smaller) than for the as-deposited one. This means that almost half of the Co atoms were removed from the sample during the irradiation process. A similar behavior was observed for the Pt L3 (Fig. 2c). However, the decrease by 18% is much smaller in comparison with Co (1.2 times smaller). This difference is related with initially different amounts of the Co and Pt atoms in the sample. The decrease of amplitude might be used for a simple estimation of the sample etching effects under irradiation. Thus, irradiation with the high fluence removes about 5 nm of Pt and about 1.9 nm of Co. Obtained values are in good agreement with the step height of 7.5 nm in the sample topography between non-irradiated and irradiated with fluence F2 regions measured with an AFM. A similar qualitative step height reduction with ion fluence was observed for Pt/Co/Au samples. However, quantitative differences result from different sputtering yields of the capping Pt and Au layers.
spectra measured at the Co and Pt absorption edges with the applied ion fluence is a common feature of both studied systems, see Figs. 2Figs. 3(a) and 3(b) show the XMCD spectra obtained at the Co K-edge for Pt/Co/Pt and Pt/Co/Au trilayers, respectively. For non-irradiated samples of both systems the spectra are very similar to each other and resemble the XMCD spectrum recorded for a pure h.c.p. Co layer (Stähler et al., 1993). It is possible to distinguish two additional peaks (emerging at 7716 and 7727 eV) for the samples irradiated with the fluences F1 and F2. The shape of the spectra acquired for both branches resemble the reference XMCD spectrum measured for the Co0.5Pt0.5 alloy with well developed L10 structure (topmost one in Fig. 3a). Such coincidence is a strong indication that the Co–Pt alloy is formed and responsible for the enhanced perpendicular anisotropy in branches 1 and 2. It is also worth mentioning that in the irradiated Pt/Co/Au trilayer a possible mixing of Co and Au does not contribute to modifications of the XMCD spectrum. Additional features come mainly from the Co/Pt interface due to intermixing/alloying.
The XMCD spectra measured at the platinum L3 for both types of the samples are presented in Figs. 4(a)–4(b). The amplitudes of the spectra are much higher for the samples irradiated with fluences F1 and F2 than for the as-deposited one. The increased amplitude reflects the appearance of magnetic moments at the Pt atoms which are induced by the magnetic moments of adjacent Co atoms in the alloy formed. Electron and the resulting changes in the at the are responsible for the observed properties of the Pt atoms. Similarly to the Co K-edge samples, the amplitude for the irradiated samples in the Pt/Co/Au trilayer is lower than that for the Pt/Co/Pt one. This difference is related to the smaller number of Pt atoms adjacent to Co in the Au/Co/Pt system as only at one interface does Co–Pt alloying take place.
Using the sum rules (Thole et al., 1992), the spin and orbital magnetic moments of the Pt atoms in the Pt/Co/Pt and the Pt/Co/Au trilayers for the as-deposited samples and two irradiated ones were determined. As the XMCD spectra at the Pt L3 for both as-deposited samples are very similar, we assumed that the relation μL/μS for Pt is identical. Under this assumption the following moments were obtained: μL = 0.002 µB per atom and μS = 0.021 µB per atom and μL/μS = 0.095. The calculated values of the induced moments at Pt atoms for irradiated samples are presented in Table 1. The increase of the spin and orbital magnetic moments in both systems with respect to the non-irradiated structures is very clear. The moments at the Pt atoms in Pt/Co/Au are slightly smaller than in Pt/Co/Pt. This is probably related to the above-mentioned different number of Pt atoms in the Co neighborhood. In both irradiated systems the orbital moment, in particular, is larger by an order of magnitude in comparison with the as-deposited configuration.
|
The observed increase of the magnetic moments at Pt atoms shows an enhanced mixing at the interfaces which results in a greater number of Co atoms adjacent to Pt ones while the Pt matrix crystallinity is still maintained. Rearrangements of this kind also change the magnetic moments at Co atoms and magnetic anisotropy energy while these parameters strongly depend on the local atomic coordination (Gambardella et al., 2003).
4. Summary
+ ion irradiation highlight the intermixing processes at the interfaces. Additionally, two-dimensional diagrams of magnetic parameters as a function of Co layer thickness and applied ion fluence, obtained from magneto-optical investigations, enable the comparison of magnetic anisotropy spatial distribution in Pt/Co/Au and Pt/Co/Pt trilayers upon irradiation. In the Pt/Co/Au trilayer, the irradiation induces two branches: the first one with only an increased value of the saturation field and the second one with PMA. In the Pt/Co/Pt trilayer, two branches with PMA are very well distinguished. The shape of the spectra measured at both Co K and Pt L3 absorption edges upon ion irradiation in both systems were changed in comparison with the as-deposited configurations. The observed evolution is related to changes in the local environment of the absorbing atoms. The decrease in the amplitude of the spectra for the highest irradiation fluence at both Co and Pt absorption edges is related to material removal (sputtering) during the irradiation process. XMCD spectra at the Co K-edge for irradiated samples are similar to XMCD spectra obtained for the Co–Pt reference alloy. This is evidence for intermixing at the interfaces and the creation of a Co–Pt alloy. Such an explanation is confirmed by magnetic moments induced at Pt atoms, especially by the enhanced increase of the orbital moments determined from the sum rules. The mixing of Co and Pt atoms and the resulting alloy creation are responsible for the formation of branches with modified values of the saturation field and particularly with PMA in two-dimensional diagrams. Comparison of both Pt/Co/Pt and Pt/Co/Au trilayers shows additionally the influence of the top interface on induced magnetic properties: one branch with only increased values of the saturation field and smaller values of induced at Pt atoms. In Pt/Co/Au trilayers, the bottom of the Co/Pt interface is mainly responsible for the induced changes.
and XMCD studies of the magnetic properties of Pt/Co/Pt and Pt/Co/Au trilayers upon 30 keV GaAcknowledgements
Supported by following projects: SYMPHONY project operated within the Foundation for Polish Science Team Programme co-financed by the EU European Regional Development Fund, OPIE2007–2013, Preludium financed by the National Science Centre (2011/03/N/ST3/02408), and bilateral Polish–French Polonium.
References
Bandiera, S., Sousa, R. C., Rodmacq, B. & Dieny, B. (2011). IEEE Magn. Lett. 2, 3000504. Google Scholar
Bandiera, S., Sousa, R. C., Rodmacq, B. & Dieny, B. (2012). Appl. Phys. Lett. 100, 142410. Web of Science CrossRef Google Scholar
Bartolome, J., Garcıa, L. M., Bartolome, F., Luis, F., Petroff, F., Deranlot, C., Wilhelm, F. & Rogalev, A. (2007). J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 316, e9–e12. CAS Google Scholar
Brandle, H., Weller, D., Scott, J. C., Parking, S. S. P. & Lin, C.-J. (1992). IEEE Trans. Magn. 28, 2967–2969. CrossRef Web of Science Google Scholar
Chappert, C., Bernas, H., Ferre, J., Kottler, V., Jamet, J.-P., Chen, Y., Cambril, E., Devolder, T., Rousseaux, F., Mathet, V. & Launois, H. (1998). Science, 280, 1919–1922. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Chappert, C. & Bruno, P. (1988). J. Appl. Phys. 64, 5736. CrossRef Web of Science Google Scholar
Chowdhury, P., Kulkarni, P. D., Krishnan, M., Barshilia, H. C., Sagdeo, A., Rai, S. K., Lodha, G. S. & Sridhara Rao, D. V. (2012). J. Appl. Phys. 112, 023912. Web of Science CrossRef Google Scholar
Fowley, C., Diao, Z., Faulkner, C. C., Kally, J., Ackland, K., Behan, G., Zhang, H. Z., Deac, A. M. & Coey, J. M. D. (2013). J. Phys. D, 46, 195501. Web of Science CrossRef Google Scholar
Franken, J. H., Swagten, H. J. M. & Koopmans, B. (2012). Nat. Nanotech. 7, 499–503. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Gambardella, P., Rusponi, S., Veronese, M., Dhesi, S. S., Grazioli, C., Dallmeyer, A., Cabria, I., Zeller, R., Dederichs, P. H., Kern, K., Carbone, C. & Brune, H. (2003). Science, 300, 1130–1133. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Jaworowicz, J., Maziewski, A., Mazalski, P., Kisielewski, M., Sveklo, I., Tekielak, M., Zablotskii, V., Ferré, J., Vernier, N., Mougin, A., Henschke, A. & Fassbender, J. (2009). Appl. Phys. Lett. 95, 022502. Web of Science CrossRef Google Scholar
Knepper, J. W. & Yang, F. Y. (2005). Phys. Rev. B, 71, 224403. Web of Science CrossRef Google Scholar
Kozinkin, Yu. A., Novakovich, A. A., Kozinkin, A. V., Vedrinskii, R. V., Zubavichus, Ya. V. & Veligzhanin, A. A. (2011). Phys. Solid State, 53, 1–5. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Kuswik, P., Sveklo, I., Szymanski, B., Urbaniak, M., Stobiecki, F., Ehresmann, A., Engel, D., Mazalski, P., Maziewski, A. & Jagielski, J. (2011). Nanotechnology, 22, 095303. PubMed Google Scholar
Lambert, C. H., Rajanikanth, A., Hauet, T., Mangin, S., Fullerton, E. E. & Andrieu, S. (2013). Appl. Phys. Lett. 102, 122410. Web of Science CrossRef Google Scholar
Lee, T. Y., Son, D. S., Lim, S. H. & Lee, S. R. (2013). J. Appl. Phys. 113, 216102. Google Scholar
Lee, Y. S., Rhee, J. Y., Whang, C. N. & Lee, Y. P. (2003). Phys. Rev. B, 68, 235111. Web of Science CrossRef Google Scholar
Lehnert, A., Dennler, S., Błoński, P., Rusponi, S., Etzkorn, M., Moulas, G., Bencok, P., Gambardella, P., Brune, H. & Hafner, J. (2010). Phys. Rev. B, 82, 094409. Web of Science CrossRef Google Scholar
Lin, W., Lei, N., Vernier, N., Agnus, G., Adam, J.-P., Eimer, S., Devolder, T., Lecoeur, P. & Ravelosona, D. (2013). Thin Solid Films, 533, 70–74. CAS Google Scholar
Lišková, E., Veis, M., Višňovský, S., Ferré, J., Mougin, A., Mazalski, P., Maziewski, A., Liedke, M. O. & Fassbender, J. (2012). Thin Solid Films, 520, 7169–7172. Google Scholar
Manchon, A., Pizzini, S., Vogel, J., Uhlir, V., Lombard, L., Ducruet, C., Auffret, S., Rodmacq, B., Dieny, B., Hochstrasser, M. & Panaccione, G. (2008). J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 320, 1889. Web of Science CrossRef Google Scholar
Matczak, M., Kuświk, P., Szymański, B., Urbaniak, M., Schmidt, M., Aleksiejew, J., Stobiecki, F. & Ehresmann, A. (2012). Appl. Phys. Lett. 100, 162402. Web of Science CrossRef Google Scholar
Mazalski, P., Kurant, Z., Maziewski, A., Liedke, M. O., Fassbender, J., Baczewski, L. T. & Wawro, A. (2013). J. Appl. Phys. 113, 17C109. Web of Science CrossRef Google Scholar
Maziewski, A., Mazalski, P., Kurant, Z., Liedke, M. O., McCord, J., Fassbender, J., Ferré, J., Mougin, A., Wawro, A., Baczewski, L. T., Rogalev, A., Wilhelm, F. & Gemming, T. (2012). Phys. Rev. B, 85, 054427. Web of Science CrossRef Google Scholar
Mihai, A. P., Whiteside, A. L., Canwell, E. J., Marrows, C. H., Benitez, M. J., McGrouther, D., McVitie, S., McFadzean, S. & Moore, A. (2013). Appl. Phys. Lett. 103, 262401. Web of Science CrossRef Google Scholar
Möller, W., Eckstein, W. & Biersack, J. P. (1988). Comput. Phys. Commun. 51, 355–368. Google Scholar
Nistor, C., Balashov, T., Kavich, J. J., Lodi Rizzini, A., Ballesteros, B., Gaudin, G., Auffret, S., Rodmacq, B., Dhesi, S. S. & Gambardella, P. (2011). Phys. Rev. B, 84, 054464. Web of Science CrossRef Google Scholar
Poulopoulos, P., Angelakeris, M., Papaioannou, E. Th., Flevaris, N. K., Niarchos, D., Nyvlt, M., Prosser, V., Visnovsky, S., Mueller, Ch., Fumagalli, P., Wilhelm, F. & Rogalev, A. (2003). J. Appl. Phys. 94, 7662. Web of Science CrossRef Google Scholar
Rettner, C. T., Anders, S., Baglin, J. E. E., Thomson, T. & Terris, B. D. (2002). Appl. Phys. Lett. 80, 279. Web of Science CrossRef Google Scholar
Richter, H. J. (2007). J. Phys. D, 40, R149–R177. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Sakamaki, M., Amemiya, K., Liedke, M. O., Fassbender, J., Mazalski, P., Sveklo, I. & Maziewski, A. (2012). Phys. Rev. B, 86, 024418. Web of Science CrossRef Google Scholar
Schaller, D. M., Bürgler, D., Schmidt, C. M., Meisinger, F. & Güntherodt, H. J. (1999). Phys. Rev. B, 59, 14516–14519. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Stähler, S., Schütz, G. & Ebert, H. (1993). Phys. Rev. B, 47, 818–826. CrossRef Web of Science Google Scholar
Stillrich, H., Menk, C., Froemter, R. & Oepen, H. P. (2010). J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 322, 1353. Web of Science CrossRef Google Scholar
Thole, B. T., Carra, P., Sette, F. & van der Laan, G. (1992). Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 1943–1946. CrossRef PubMed CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Tierno, P., Reddy, S. V., Yuan, J., Johansen, T. H. & Fischer, T. M. (2007). J. Phys. Chem. B, 111, 13479–13482. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Vieu, C., Gierak, J., Launois, H., Aign, T., Meyer, P., Jamet, J. P., Ferré, J., Chappert, C., Devolder, T., Mathet, V. & Bernas, H. (2002). J. Appl. Phys. 91, 3103. Web of Science CrossRef Google Scholar
Zarpellon, J., Jaffrès, H., Frougier, J., Deranlot, C., George, J. M., Mosca, D. H., Lemaître, A., Freimuth, F., Duong, Q. H., Renucci, P. & Marie, X. (2012). Phys. Rev. B, 86, 205314. Web of Science CrossRef Google Scholar
Zhang, J. Y., Wu, Z. L., Wang, S. G., Zhao, C. J., Yang, G., Zhang, S. L., Liu, Y., Liu, S., Teng, J. & Yu, G. H. (2013). Appl. Phys. Lett. 102, 102404. Web of Science CrossRef Google Scholar
Zhang, J., Yang, G., Wang, S., Zhang, S., Zhang, P., Cao, X., Jiang, S., Zhao, C., Liu, Y., Wang, H. & Yu, G. (2013). Appl. Phys. Express, 6, 103007. Web of Science CrossRef Google Scholar
© International Union of Crystallography. Prior permission is not required to reproduce short quotations, tables and figures from this article, provided the original authors and source are cited. For more information, click here.