view article

Figure 4
Third test case. (a) Original phantom. (b) Result of filtered back-projection after adding lines of variable width and intensity in the sinogram. (c) Image back-projected after applying the Munch et al. de-striper algorithm, with [\sigma] = 2.5, L = 5 and the `Daubechies 20' wavelet. (d) Difference between the phantom and the corrected image. The PSNR is 23.2. (e) Result of the correction using the RCP technique, with W = 10 and [\theta_{0}] = 10. (f) Difference between the phantom and the corrected image. The PSNR is 21.2. (g) Result of the reconstruction using the Total Variation regularization, with parameters [\beta] = 0.5, [\beta_{r}] = 0.05. (h) Difference between the phantom and the corrected image. The PSNR is 29.9. (i) Result of the reconstruction using the Dictionary Learning technique with parameters [\beta] = 0.05, [\beta_{r}] = 3×10-3, [\rho] = 10. (j) Difference between the reconstruction and the phantom. The PSNR is 28.3.

Journal logoJOURNAL OF
SYNCHROTRON
RADIATION
ISSN: 1600-5775
Follow J. Synchrotron Rad.
Sign up for e-alerts
Follow J. Synchrotron Rad. on Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds