view article
Figure 8
Comparison of the RMS error values at different sample-to-detector propagation distances. (a) RMS error (%) expressed at sample-to-detector distances of 25, 50, 75 and 100 cm. A comparison is made between the error of the whole profile as seen in red, the error of the large Perspex sphere as seen in green, and the error of the small glass spheres as seen in blue. (b) RMS error (%) expressed at the same sample-to-detector distances. A comparison is made between the reconstruction near the edge of the large Perspex sphere and the bulk of the Perspex sphere. The error bars are less than 1% RMS error, which is smaller than the data points and so are not shown.

Journal logoJOURNAL OF
SYNCHROTRON
RADIATION
ISSN: 1600-5775
Volume 22| Part 5| September 2015| Pages 1279-1288
https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600577515011406
Follow J. Synchrotron Rad.
Sign up for e-alerts
E-alerts
Follow J. Synchrotron Rad. on Twitter
Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds
RSS