beamlines
Implementation of ultrafast X-ray diffraction at the 1W2B wiggler beamline of Beijing Synchrotron Radiation Facility
aBeijing Synchrotron Radiation Facility, Institute of High Energy Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 19B Yuquan Road, Beijing 100049, People's Republic of China, and bAccelerator Division, Institute of High Energy Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 19B Yuquan Road, Beijing 100049, People's Republic of China
*Correspondence e-mail: taoy@ihep.ac.cn
The implementation of a laser pump/X-ray probe scheme for performing picosecond-resolution X-ray diffraction at the 1W2B wiggler beamline at Beijing Synchrotron Radiation Facility is reported. With the hybrid fill pattern in top-up mode, a pixel array X-ray detector was optimized to gate out the signal from the singlet bunch with interval 85 ns from the bunch train. The singlet pulse intensity is ∼2.5 × 106 photons pulse−1 at 10 keV. The laser pulse is synchronized to this singlet bunch at a 1 kHz repetition rate. A polycapillary X-ray lens was used for secondary focusing to obtain a 72 µm (FWHM) X-ray spot. Transient photo-induced strain in BiFeO3 film was observed at a ∼150 ps time resolution for demonstration.
1. Introduction
The significance could not be overestimated if we were able to capture the structure change in a chemical or physical process, since dynamic structure information is imperative to unravelling the mechanism and bridge between structure and function. Synchrotrons have played an important role in ultrafast X-ray studies based on the laser pump/X-ray probe scheme, which has been realised at several synchrotron sources (Kozina et al., 2014; Lima et al., 2011; March et al., 2011; Ejdrup et al., 2009; Navirian et al., 2007, 2012; Laulhé et al., 2013). The time resolution is usually dependent on the X-ray which is generally 100 ps (FWHM) for synchrotron lightsources, while the laser-slicing technique has been developed to obtain a femtosecond pulse but at the large expense of pulse intensity (Beaud et al., 2007). Recently, the X-ray free-electron laser has transformed dynamic research owing to its <100 fs pulse and unprecedented pulse intensity (Chollet et al., 2015). However, for dynamic studies in the picosecond to microsecond range, the synchrotron has its advantages due to its excellent stability, broader energy tune range and higher repetition rate.
The Beijing Synchrotron Radiation Facility (BSRF) is a parasitic light source of the Beijing Electron and Positron Collider. Here we describe the implementation of the laser pump/X-ray probe system at BSRF under hybrid fill pattern, utilizing a 1 kHz laser system and a gated pixel array X-ray detector. The photo-induced lattice dynamics in BiFeO3 film were investigated by picosecond X-ray diffraction to demonstrate the capability of the setup.
2. Experimental details
Like ultrafast optical and electron measurements, ultrafast X-ray methods generally employ a pump–probe scheme. A pulse, usually a laser pulse, excites a sample to excitation state and a following X-ray pulse arrives at a fixed timing delay to snapshot the structure at this moment. The complete dynamic process is revealed by recording at different delays between the X-ray and the laser pulse. The details of our laser pump/X-ray probe setup are described in this section.
2.1. X-ray source
The laser pump/X-ray probe experiment generally requires a hybrid fill pattern in which a specific single bunch is filled with sufficient interval from other bunches such that the signal from the singlet can be selected out. The hybrid fill pattern has become a routine fill mode in BSRF operation. As shown in Fig. 1, the interval between the singlet bunch and bunch train is 85 ns. The X-ray pulse from this singlet bunch will be synchronized with the laser pulse and captured by the detector. The storage ring was operating in top-up mode with a constant beam current at 250 mA and singlet bunch current at 1.6 mA. The X-ray pulse intensity from this singlet is ∼2.5 × 106 photons pulse−1 at 10 keV. The X-ray is ∼150 ps (FWHM), calculated from the bunch length. This singlet bunch circulates around the storage ring at 1.243 MHz with a period of 804 ns.
The laser beam was guided to the 1W2B beamline, a wiggler beamline at BSRF. A Si(111) double-crystal monochromator provides an energy tuning range from 5 keV to 15 keV with energy resolution ΔE/E = 4 × 10−4. A toroidal mirror focuses the beam to 0.8 mm (V) × 1.0 mm (H) (FWHM). To excite the sample efficiently and uniformly, the size of the laser spot is required to be larger than the X-ray spot on the sample. A small laser spot is helpful in mitigating the heating effect and reducing sample damage; thus, a smaller X-ray spot size is preferred. A polycapillary lens was used as a secondary focusing optics due to its large acceptance and ease of installation and alignment. The lens can focus the X-ray beam down to 72 µm (FWHM). Although the beam angular divergence increases after the capillary lens, it can be utilized to enable the sample multiple diffraction peaks and substrate signal to be observable simultaneously if an area X-ray detector was used. The substrate signal can be used as a reference signal for normalization, which is imperative in detecting a diffraction intensity change. Further, the simultaneously observed multiple peaks will keep the detection of the change of different diffraction peaks consistent, and improve time-resolved experiment efficiency.
2.2. Laser source
The femtosecond laser, equipped for our established laser plasma X-ray source, is shared as the pump source for the synchrotron-based pump–probe setup. The laser system consists of a Ti:sapphire oscillator (Micra5, Coherent Ltd) and a Ti:sapphire regenerative amplifier (Legend Elite USP He+, Coherent Ltd). The oscillator operates at 83.3 MHz repetition rate, one-sixth of the storage-ring radio frequency (RF) 499.8 MHz. The synchronization between the laser pulse and the X-ray pulse was realised in the oscillator, as described in the following section. The laser pulse from the oscillator needs to be amplified by the amplifier for practical application, and thus the repetition rate of the pump–probe measurement is generally dependent on the laser amplifier repetition rate. The amplifier runs at 1.002 kHz repetition rate (1/1240 of the storage-ring revolution frequency 1.243 MHz) with 800 nm fundamental output.
The laser system is located in a temperature-stabilized room for the laser-plasma X-ray source-based pump–probe setup. In order to reach the desired beamline 1W2B, the laser beam is transported for 45 m using mirrors. The laser spot stability at the sample position was kept within 50 µm after transportation. To overcome long-term drift owing to the 45 m transportation path, we installed an active laser feedback unit (MRC Systems GmbH). In addition, the pulse was stretched from 40 fs to ∼1 ps for transportation in order to reduce adverse nonlinear effects, while the 1 ps pulse is sufficient for the sample pump with respect to the 100 ps X-ray pulse. In the meantime, the stretched pulse could mitigate the nonlinear optic effects in sample absorption. Close to the sample, a diode was installed to detect the laser leaked from the reflection mirror, and this diode signal will be used in gating detection. The parameters of both the X-ray and the laser source are listed in Table 1.
|
2.3. Synchronization and delay control
Synchronization between the X-ray pulse and the laser pulse is a prerequisite for the laser pump/X-ray probe system. The timing of the X-ray pulse is determined by the RF signal of the master oscillator. If we use the RF signal as a reference to control the frequency and phase of the laser pulse, the laser pulse will be synchronized to the X-ray pulse. Because the frequency and phase of the laser pulse are determined by the laser oscillator cavity length, by using a piezo-controlled mirror in the oscillator cavity, the cavity length can be adjusted actively to phase lock the reference signal from RF so that the laser pulse is in synchronization with the X-ray pulse.
The synchronization and delay control design is displayed in Fig. 2. The master RF frequency is 499.8 MHz, which was divided into 124.95 MHz by an event generator (EVG), and then distributed by optical fiber to a FPGA-based event electronic module (EVE) and an event receiver (EVR). The EVE is located in the laser room, while the EVR is in the beamline providing a timing trigger. The EVE plays the roles of a frequency divider and fine delay control as well. It down-converted the 124.95 MHz to 83.3 MHz as the reference signal. The reference signal was input into a phase-lock loop unit (SynchroLock; Coherent Ltd), which controlled a pizeo-actuated cavity mirror to phase lock the reference signal. The jitter between the oscillator laser pulse and the reference is 9.9 ps (RMS). After synchronization, the pulses from the oscillator were selected by a pulse picker triggered by a 1.002 kHz signal from the EVE and sent to the laser amplifier.
In order to record dynamic processes, the delay (Δt) between laser and X-ray pulse needs to be adjustable. Delay control was realised in two ways. Because the interval between laser pulses from the oscillator is 12 ns, corresponding to a 83.3 MHz repetition rate, for coarse delay control we could vary the delay at a 12 ns step by picking the alternative pulse from pulse trains of the oscillator output (Fig. 2). Next, fine delay control within 12 ns was achieved by the EVE at a minimum step of 5 ps.
2.4. Temporal and spatial overlap
The X-ray pulse and the laser pulse should be temporally and spatially overlapped for laser pump/X-ray probe measurements. With respect to the coarse temporal overlap, we used an in-house-built . This alignment could attain temporal overlap within 500 ps. The accurate temporal overlap was optimized by scanning the delay for maximum sample laser-on signal.
detector which is sensitive to both X-ray and optical laser pulse with 2 ns rise edge. Monitoring on a 4 GHz oscilloscope, we could observe the interval between X-ray and laser signal. By adjusting the delay between the laser pulse and the X-ray pulse, we could align the half-height position of the rising edges of both the X-ray and the laser signals, as shown in Fig. 3For coarse spatial overlap, a thin photographic film sensitive to X-rays was placed on the surface of the sample to expose the X-ray spot. The laser spot is around 800 µm in diameter, much larger than the X-ray spot size, so it was convenient to adjust the laser spot position using a motorized mirror to overlap the exposed X-ray spot. Precise spatial overlap could be achieved by scanning the laser spot on the sample to maximize the sample laser-on signal.
2.5. Gated detection
The interval between the singlet and bunch trains is ∼85 ns, as shown in Fig. 4(a). However, there is no mechanical chopper fast enough to isolate this singlet pulse with hard X-rays (Cammarata et al., 2009). To circumvent this limitation, we used an X-ray pixel array detector (Pilatus 100k) for diffraction detection, as its electronic gate function could be utilized to gate out the signal from the singlet pulse (Ejdrup et al., 2009). In addition, the large scan range of the area detector makes it favourable for time-resolved experiments, especially for measurements based on polycapillary focusing. The gate signal width is 10 ns and comes from a delay generator triggered by a 1.002 kHz signal from the EVR, i.e. with frequency the same as the laser amplifier repetition rate. This area detector was optimized in and apparent gate width to narrow down the effective gate window width for gating out the expected signal. Then we scanned the gated signal through a 804 ns range, the storage-ring revolution period. As shown in Fig. 4(b), the integrated scattering signal presents a pattern similar to the hybrid bunch structure in Fig. 1, and the bump around 100 ns represents the signal from the singlet bunch. From this scan the effective gate ability of the detector is estimated to be around 80 ns. The gate was fixed at the bump centre position to gate out the laser-on signal after the temporal overlap was attained. In the meantime, both the analogue exposure output of the detector and the diode signal of the laser pulse were monitored to ensure gating of the laser-on signal.
3. Ultrafast X-ray diffraction demonstration
Diffraction detection was performed in vertical
geometry. The detector distance was adjustable, up to a maximum of 750 mm. The evacuated tube between the sample and the detector was used to decrease air absorption and served for scattering suppression as well. The sample could be measured down to 100 K using a commercial open-flow nitrogen gas cryostat.The performance of the laser pump/X-ray probe setup was demonstrated by measuring the photo-induced strain in BiFeO3 (BFO) film, a well studied multiferroic material, by ultrafast X-ray diffraction (Wen et al., 2013; Schick et al., 2014; Li et al., 2015). A 35 nm-thick BFO film was grown onto a LaSrAlTiO3 substrate by reactive molecular-beam Because the optical band gap of BFO is 2.74 eV (Ihlefeld et al., 2008), the 800 nm fundamental laser pulse is frequency doubled by a BBO crystal to 400 nm (3.1 eV) for the electronic excitation. The X-ray of the 1W2B beamline peaks at 10 keV, so we selected 10 keV for diffraction. The gated diffraction signal was obtained by the above area detector, which is 415 mm away from the sample. The static diffraction measurements are compared for gated and non-gated signal in Fig. 5(a). The ultrafast X-ray diffraction signal was detected by monitoring the Bragg peak of the (002) reflection of the BFO at room temperature. Upon the (002) peak shifts to lower angle and becomes broader, as shown in Fig. 5(b). The shift represents an expansion of the BFO out-of-plane lattice parameter c. This transient out-of-plane strain can be attributed to the localized photoinduced carriers and the accompanying change of electric field (Wen et al., 2013). The change of the of the BFO (002) reflection, along with the corresponding photoinduced strain (Δc/c) and peak width change, is displayed as a function of time delay in Fig. 6. The relaxation process of the angle shift and peak broadening can be fitted by a single component exponential function with a time constant of 2.4 ns and 1.9 ns, respectively, consistent with that reported (Wen et al., 2013).
4. Summary and outlook
We have implemented a laser pump/X-ray probe scheme in a wiggler beamline at BSRF and observed photo-induced strain in a BFO film at ∼150 ps resolution. There is room for improvement in the jitter suppression and the signal-to-noise ratio. The jitter between laser and RF signal will be improved after upgrade of our RF distribution system. The singlet bunch current is only 1.6 mA, but it could be increased to at least 5 mA in the near future to provide a higher pulse intensity for ultrafast detection. Moreover, the current setup runs at 1 kHz repetition rate due to laser repetition rate limitation. The revolution frequency of the singlet bunch is 1.243 MHz, so a high-repetition-rate pump–probe, up to MHz, will be developed using a high-repetition-rate laser (Kozina et al., 2014; Lima et al., 2011; March et al., 2011; Navirian et al., 2012). The current Pilatus 100k detector can run under gate mode triggered at 1.24 MHz to capture the singlet signal. Compared with 1 kHz rate collection, the data quality collected under MHz rate is expected to be improved remarkably. Furthermore, the MHz laser will be portable, so the laser pump/X-ray probe system will be available at other beamlines. Besides diffraction detection, the probe will be extended to X-ray absorption/emission spectroscopy and liquid scattering.
In addition, we have established a sub-picosecond laser pump/X-ray probe ultrafast X-ray diffraction setup based on a table-top laser plasma femtosecond X-ray source (Zhang et al., 2014). However, the laser plasma source has limitations in intensity stability, pulse intensity and fixed energy at the Cu Kα line. Excepting the synchrotron X-ray source has advantages over these limitations. Therefore, these two methods are complementary in ultrafast detection, and this synergy has been applied well elsewhere (Schick et al., 2014). In combination with laser plasma source-based sub-picosecond detection, the implementation of synchrotron-based time-resolved X-ray detection will make the BSRF a first-generation parasitic lightsource with unique capability in ultrafast X-ray study.
Acknowledgements
The BFO sample was kindly provided by Dr Yuelin Li, Advanced Photon Source. We are grateful to Zhenhua Gao and Yinglei Tan for their help with software and hardware setup. This work is supported by the High Energy Photon Source-Test Facility project and the National Science Foundation of China (U1332205).
References
Beaud, P., Johnson, S. L., Streun, A., Abela, R., Abramsohn, D., Grolimund, D., Krasniqi, F., Schmidt, T., Schlott, V. & Ingold, G. (2007). Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 174801. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Cammarata, M., Eybert, L., Ewald, F., Reichenbach, W., Wulff, M., Anfinrud, P., Schotte, F., Plech, A., Kong, Q. Y., Lorenc, M., Lindenau, B., Räbiger, J. & Polachowski, S. (2009). Rev. Sci. Instrum. 80, 015101. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Chollet, M., Alonso-Mori, R., Cammarata, M., Damiani, D., Defever, J., Delor, J. T., Feng, Y., Glownia, J. M., Langton, J. B., Nelson, S., Ramsey, K., Robert, A., Sikorski, M., Song, S., Stefanescu, D., Srinivasan, V., Zhu, D., Lemke, H. T. & Fritz, D. M. (2015). J. Synchrotron Rad. 22, 503–507. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Ejdrup, T., Lemke, H. T., Haldrup, K., Nielsen, T. N., Arms, D. A., Walko, D. A., Miceli, A., Landahl, E. C., Dufresne, E. M. & Nielsen, M. M. (2009). J. Synchrotron Rad. 16, 387–390. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Ihlefeld, J. F., Podraza, N. J., Liu, Z. K., Rai, R. C., Xu, X., Heeg, T., Chen, Y. B., Li, J., Collins, R. W., Musfeldt, J. L., Pan, X. Q., Schubert, J., Ramesh, R. & Schlom, D. G. (2008). Appl. Phys. Lett. 92, 142908. Web of Science CrossRef Google Scholar
Kozina, M., Hu, T., Wittenberg, J. S., Szilagyi, E., Trigo, M., Miller, T. A., Uher, C., Damodaran, A., Martin, L., Mehta, A., Corbett, J., Safranek, J., Reis, D. A. & Lindenberg, A. M. (2014). Struct Dyn. 1, 034301. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Laulhé, C., Cammarata, M., Servol, M., Miller, R. J. D., Hada, M. & Ravy, S. (2013). Eur. Phys. J. Spec. Top. 222, 1277–1285. Google Scholar
Li, Y., Adamo, C., Chen, P., Evans, P. G., Nakhmanson, S. M., Parker, W., Rowland, C. E., Schaller, R. D., Schlom, D. G., Walko, D. A., Wen, H. & Zhang, Q. (2015). Sci. Rep. 5, 16650. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Lima, F. A., Milne, C. J., Amarasinghe, D. C. V., Rittmann-Frank, M. H., van der Veen, R. M., Reinhard, M., Pham, V. T., Karlsson, S., Johnson, S. L., Grolimund, D., Borca, C., Huthwelker, T., Janousch, M., van Mourik, F., Abela, R. & Chergui, M. (2011). Rev. Sci. Instrum. 82, 063111. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
March, A. M., Stickrath, A., Doumy, G., Kanter, E. P., Krässig, B., Southworth, S. H., Attenkofer, K., Kurtz, C. A., Chen, L. X. & Young, L. (2011). Rev. Sci. Instrum. 82, 073110. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Navirian, H., Shayduk, R., Leitenberger, W., Goldshteyn, J., Gaal, P. & Bargheer, M. (2012). Rev. Sci. Instrum. 83, 063303. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Nozawa, S., Adachi, S., Takahashi, J., Tazaki, R., Guérin, L., Daimon, M., Tomita, A., Sato, T., Chollet, M., Collet, E., Cailleau, H., Yamamoto, S., Tsuchiya, K., Shioya, T., Sasaki, H., Mori, T., Ichiyanagi, K., Sawa, H., Kawata, H. & Koshihara, S. (2007). J. Synchrotron Rad. 14, 313–319. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Schick, D., Herzog, M., Wen, H. D., Chen, P., Adamo, C., Gaal, P., Schlom, D. G., Evans, P. G., Li, Y. L. & Bargheer, M. (2014). Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 097602. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Wen, H. D., Chen, P., Cosgriff, M. P., Walko, D. A., Lee, J. H., Adamo, C., Schaller, R. D., Ihlefeld, J. F., Dufresne, E. M., Schlom, D. G., Evans, P. G., Freeland, J. W. & Li, Y. L. (2013). Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 037601. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Zhang, B. B., Sun, S. S., Sun, D. R. & Tao, Y. (2014). Rev. Sci. Instrum. 85, 096110. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
© International Union of Crystallography. Prior permission is not required to reproduce short quotations, tables and figures from this article, provided the original authors and source are cited. For more information, click here.