view article
Figure 3
(a) Bottom to top: mirror slope error at 0 V, then theoretical three-, five- and seven-segment surface modifications to try to mimic the slope error at 0 V. Each plot has been shifted upward by 5 µrad from the one before for easy comparison. (b) Theoretical simple concave surface modification with expected best approximation achieved by mirror as calculated from its slope error at 0 V and its measured PRFs. The calculated voltage settings first remove the polishing errors and then add the desired modification. Intended beam size is 4 µm for all cases.

Journal logoJOURNAL OF
SYNCHROTRON
RADIATION
ISSN: 1600-5775
Volume 23| Part 6| November 2016| Pages 1333-1347
https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600577516013308
Follow J. Synchrotron Rad.
Sign up for e-alerts
E-alerts
Follow J. Synchrotron Rad. on Twitter
Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds
RSS