view article
Figure 2
X-ray flux variation. (a) XBIC profiles at different X-ray fluxes, Φ, for the InP nanowire (Φ0 = 2.6 × 106 s−1). The drawing nanowire indicates the nominal segment lengths. (b) Magnitude of the XBIC peak versus Φ. The solid line is calculated according to equation (1[link]), and the dashed line is a linear fit to the measured data. (c) Fitted decay lengths, Ll and Lr, for InP 2 and InGaP versus Φ. The error bars are a result of the decay length fitting (see Fig. S1).

Journal logoJOURNAL OF
SYNCHROTRON
RADIATION
ISSN: 1600-5775
Volume 26| Part 1| January 2019| Pages 102-108
https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600577518015229
Follow J. Synchrotron Rad.
Sign up for e-alerts
E-alerts
Follow J. Synchrotron Rad. on Twitter
Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds
RSS