topical reviews
Synchrotron radiation micro-tomography for high-resolution neurovascular network morphology investigation
aDepartment of Spine Surgery, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha 410008, People's Republic of China, bKey Laboratory of Organ Injury, Aging and Regenerative Medicine of Hunan Province, Changsha, Hunan 410008, People's Republic of China, cXiangya Hospital-International Chinese Musculoskeletal Research Society Sports Medicine Research Center, Changsha, Hunan 410008, People's Republic of China, dDepartment of Neurology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha 410008, People's Republic of China, eSchool of Information Science and Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410008, People's Republic of China, fCenter for Drug Delivery System, Shanghai Institute of Materia Medica, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 20203, People's Republic of China, gShanghai Synchrotron Radiation Facility/Zhangjiang Lab, Shanghai Advanced Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 21204, People's Republic of China, and hDepartment of Sport Medicine, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha 410008, People's Republic of China
*Correspondence e-mail: hongbinlu@hotmail.com, jianzhonghu@hotmail.com
There has been increasing interest in using high-resolution micro-tomography to investigate the morphology of neurovascular networks in the central nervous system, which remain difficult to characterize due to their microscopic size as well as their delicate and complex 3D structure. Synchrotron radiation X-ray imaging, which has emerged as a cutting-edge imaging technology with a high spatial resolution, provides a novel platform for the non-destructive imaging of microvasculature networks at a sub-micrometre scale. When coupled with computed tomography, this technique allows the characterization of the 3D morphology of vasculature. The current review focuses on recent progress in developing synchrotron radiation methodology and its application in probing neurovascular networks, especially the pathological changes associated with vascular abnormalities in various model systems. Furthermore, this tool represents a powerful imaging modality that improves our understanding of the complex biological interactions between vascular function and neuronal activity in both physiological and pathological states.
Keywords: high-resolution; imaging; neurovascular network; 3D.
1. Introduction
Vascular diseases of the central nervous system, including aneurysms, atherosclerotic and arteriovenous malformations (AVMs), represent huge health and economic burdens and can lead to serious neurological problems or even death (Mouchtouris et al., 2015; Krings, 2010). The early stages of these diseases are closely associated with small vessel lesions that are reflected by injury to the microvasculature. The microvasculature network in the central nervous system is arguably the most delicate 3D structure among all biological organs (Marín-Padilla, 2012; Martirosyan et al., 2011). However, there are limitations to our understanding of the changes in the 3D morphology of small vessel lesions at the resolution of current imaging techniques. The detection and precise description of small vessel lesions in 3D space at a very early stage might also improve disease diagnosis and prognosis.
Current work aimed at improving the diagnosis of vascular diseases in clinical practice involves digital subtraction angiography (DSA), magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) and computed tomography angiography (CTA). However, all of these techniques lack sufficient imaging resolution to detect vasculature on a micrometre or sub-micrometre level (Mori et al., 1994, 1996). The advent of synchrotron radiation (SR) has added a new dimension to vascular disease diagnosis and has the potential to open new avenues for the implementation of innovative imaging techniques for addressing this issue. Recently, ex vivo and in vivo imaging using SR has been performed to probe the morphology of the microvasculature of various organ systems (Lu et al., 2010; Ackermann & Konerding, 2015; Velroyen et al., 2014; Kobayashi et al., 2004; Pabst et al., 2014). Since the 1980s, SR imaging has been firstly used in coronary angiography in humans (Rubenstein et al., 1986). The quasi-parallel and monochromatic SR beam has the ability to detect microvessels and delivers a lower radiation dose to patients than conventional computed tomography (CT); thus, SR has the potential for the regular application in clinical practice, and could become a powerful medical diagnostic tool (Zhao et al., 2012; Zhu et al., 2010; Bravin et al., 2013; Longo, 2016; Xi et al., 2015). There have also been extensive experimental analyses of the neurovascular network of the central nervous system in preclinical studies of various pathologies using the BL13W beamline at the Shanghai Synchrotron Radiation Facility in China (Xi et al., 2015; Cao et al., 2015; Zhang et al., 2014a), as well as at the Swiss Light Source (SLS) (Heinzer et al., 2006, 2008), SPring-8 (Kidoguchi et al., 2006; Myojin et al., 2007) and ESRF (Risser et al., 2007; Fratini et al., 2015).
In the present study, we focused on recent methodological developments involving SR and their application in the investigation of neurovascular in the central nervous system in preclinical experiments. We emphasize their ability to demarcate in greater resolution the 3D features of the microvasculature of the brain and spinal cord, which can also be analyzed using digital post-processing methods to improve our understanding of the interaction between vascular function and neuronal activity under the physiological and pathological conditions.
2. Characteristics of synchrotron radiation
Synchrotron radiation was first observed in 1947 in an accelerator of the General Electric Synchrotron in the USA (Meuli et al., 2004). When high-energy electrons travel in a storage ring at a speed close to that of light, the direction of the their motion changes under the force of the magnetic field, and electromagnetic radiation known as synchotron radiation is emitted from the circular orbit.
There are now more than 50 dedicated synchrotron radiation light sources worldwide, most of which are second and third generation (Bilderback et al., 2005). Table 1 lists representative third-generation synchrotron radiation facilities, the majority of which were constructed with medium-energy electron beams ranging from 2 to 4 GeV. Only the ESRF, PETRA III, SPring-8 and APS are optimized to operate in a high-energy range (6–8 GeV) capable of producing high-intensity X-rays ranging from 10 keV to 50 keV. Other features include a full waveband, high coherence, high directionality, high efficiency, and quasi-parallel and monochromatic beams, especially at high intensities tens of thousands times higher than those achieved by laboratory or medical X-ray sources. Thus, these beams offer high spatial resolution for imaging specimens as well as high time resolution, and greatly reduce the time necessary to obtain experimental data (Hofmann, 1990).
|
The Shanghai Synchrotron Radiation Facility (SSRF) in China, which houses the most powerful medium-energy light source, uses a 150 MeV LINAC, a booster that can accelerate electrons to 3.5 GeV in half a second and reserve them in the 3.5 GeV electron storage ring with a current of 240 mA and low emittance (3.9 nm rad) (Chen et al., 2014). With the advanced insertion devices installed in the storage ring at SSRF, synchrotron radiation light is characteristic of high which is invaluable and available at the X-ray Imaging and Biomedical Application beamline (BL13W1).
The X-ray beam is produced using a 16-pole wiggler, while a double silicon crystal monochromator provides the X-ray beam with energy ranging from 8 to 72.5 keV. The beam 10 photons mm−2 s−1). The Kohzu six-dimensional sample stage and the precision slide rail are flexibly adjustable. In this manner, the optimal sample-to-detector distance and region of interest can be easily selected. The detector system of the SSRF consists of a 100 µm scintillator and Optique Peter microscope system, and the PCO2000 camera registers 2048 × 2048 pixels. Its performance is optimized across widely used X-ray energies. By using advanced insertion technology, both high-brilliance synchrotron radiation light with 1–5 keV photon energy as well as high-brilliance hard X-rays with 5–60 keV photon energy can be generated, which exhibit similar properties to a high-energy light source (6–8 GeV).
is 45 mm (horizontal) × 5 mm (vertical), and the density on the sample is approximately 1.5 × 103. Development of SR methodology
3.1. SR absorption contrast imaging
X-ray absorption contrast imaging is achieved by exploiting the different attenuating powers of the materials within a sample (Rabin et al., 2006). This is the most commonly held theory regarding the performance of imaging diagnostic tools that are widely used in medical institutions. Compared with conventional imaging techniques, SR offers several advantages for absorption contrast imaging. The natural collimation of SR makes it possible to select monochromatic radiation for imaging, which enables the tuning of the X-ray energy as a function of the requirements of the examination and a specific sample's characteristics. Consequently, the radiation dose delivered to the specimen can be reduced, which has the potential to translate into clinical application. Moreover, the use of a small spot size and coherent radiation facilitates the high-resolution characterization of different tissue and vessels after contrast agent injection (Suortti & Thomlinson, 2003; Lewis, 1997).
3.2. SR phase contrast imaging
The difference in X-ray attenuation in biological soft tissues is typically weak, and different tissues are rarely differentiated using conventional imaging techniques. In contrast, the phase-contrast imaging becomes visible using SR, was discovered by Fritz Zernike in 1930 and is emerging as an alternative to conventional X-ray radiography (Momose et al., 1996; Zernike, 1955). It allows the detection of weakly differentiated biological soft tissues by picking up phase shifts of the X-ray as it traverses the object (Stevenson et al., 2003; Diemoz et al., 2012). Recently, a variety of X-ray phase-contrast imaging methods have been developed using SR, including (i) propagation-based imaging; (ii) analyzer-based imaging; (iii) interferometric imaging; (iv) grating interferometric imaging; and (v) grating non-interferometric imaging (Lin et al., 2015a). At the BL13W1 beamline at SSRF, the propagation-based method has been implemented without the need for additional optics in the SR imaging geometry. The variations in deviate the X-rays at angles that can be detected by adjusting the detector at a certain distance from the object. In this scenario, edge-enhanced images could be produced, and the interfaces and boundaries in the specimen with different refraction properties were captured. Recently, a grating-based imaging method featuring absorption grating and phase grating have been established at BL13W1 (Xi et al., 2012).
3.3. SR microtomography
Microtomography is a non-destructive technique that is widely used for 3D imaging of sample morphology, and quantitative information describing sample structure can also be obtained (Larrue et al., 2011; Lu et al., 2015). SR microtomography (SR-µCT) offers several advantages over conventional methods. SR allows high-resolution acquisition of the 3D morphology of a sample at the micrometre level as well as a quantitative evaluation of the distribution within the sample. Furthermore, SR yields reconstructed CT images that are free of beam-hardening artifacts (Tapfer et al., 2014). SR phase-contrast microtomography, a complement to absorption microtomography, is a novel imaging modality with extensive applications in biomedicine recently, especially for the study of vessel structure without the use of a contrast agent (Hagen et al., 2015; Hwu et al., 2004). PITRE software, developed by Chen, is freeware that supports SR-based phase-sensitive X-ray imaging and is used for phase retrieval and imaging reconstruction at the BL13W1 facility (Chen et al., 2012).
3.4. SR microangiography
Microangiography using SR as the light resource yields superior image quality and permits detailed high-resolution imaging of microvessels down to a 10 µm diameter in vivo (Kidoguchi et al., 2006; Yamashita et al., 2002; Lundström et al., 2012; Tang et al., 2011; Shirai et al., 2013). SR microangiography has a high temporal resolution and a short exposure time on the order of milliseconds, allowing for a high and narrow pulse time appropriate for real-time dynamic imaging of microvessels within intact organ systems (Shirai et al., 2009). Furthermore, the high-energy X-ray beam emitted from the synchrotron storage ring produces extremely bright light that can penetrate thick tissue and create high-contrast, blur-free images of a sample.
There are two approaches to using SR microangiography for vascular imaging: K-edge subtraction angiography and single-energy temporal subtraction angiography. With K-edge subtraction, imaging large animals is possible, but resolution is compromised. The second approach, which enhances a contrast agent contained in blood vessels using single-energy monochromatic SR, facilitates high-resolution imaging at the expense of the imaging field of view (Peterzol et al., 2005).
4. Use of SR in neurovascular imaging
The structure of the neurovascular network in the central nervous system is more complicated than that of any other known biological organ. At present, the relationship between neural activity and vascular function has not been fully elucidated. Fine-grained descriptions of the morphology of the neurovascular network at the micrometre or sub-micrometre level may underlie pathological changes or developmental disorders, and as such should be characterized. One advantage of SR is its ability to characterize the 3D morphology of a specimen without sectioning when combined with a tomography algorithm. Additionally, SR enables the differentiation of vessels without the use of a contrast agent, and identifies similar structures at high resolution. Moreover, this technique permits the visualization of microvasculature in situ under natural physiological conditions (Shirai et al., 2009). In this section, we focus primarily on evaluating the application of SR for ultra-high-resolution imaging and neurovascular morphology microtomography under physiological and various pathological conditions.
4.1. Cerebral vascular system
4.1.1. In vivo functional imaging
Conventional techniques such as MRA and CTA are commonly used in the detection of large superficial pial vessels, whereas smaller and deeper arterioles are below the et al., 2014b). Currently, numerous investigations study the microstructure and function of these smaller cerebral vessels, primarily in rodents (Guan et al., 2012; Yuan et al., 2012; Liu et al., 2010) (Fig. 1), and occasionally in larger animals.
of conventional imaging techniques. Undoubtedly, this limitation is detrimental to disease diagnostics and prognosis at very early stages. With the aid of SR microangiography (SRA), microvascular changes correlating with many cerebral disorders are being intensely identified and studied. Early experiments aimed to validate SR as an effective method for measuring the diameters of small cerebral microvessels (ZhangSRA makes possible the study of the dynamic autoregulatory responses of both pial and penetrating perforating microvascular beds simultaneously, without magnification artifacts or focal blurring during pathological conditions such as hypoxia, hypertension, hyperglycemia, stroke, subarachnoid hemorrhage or cerebral aneurysms and aging related disease (Guan et al., 2012; Yuan et al., 2012; Liu et al., 2010; Zhao et al., 2015; Wang et al., 2016; Mu et al., 2016; Lu et al., 2012; Lin et al., 2015b). It is common knowledge that angiogenesis exhibits an important compensatory pattern in ischemic diseases to improve the blood supply to ischemic regions. Lu et al. (2012) employed SRA as an effective auxiliary method to observe angiogenesis in situ in conjunction with different therapies, including gene overexpression, to treat ischemic stroke in animal models. These studies provide potent support for the evaluation of the curative effects of novel therapies using these tools. Furthermore, Lin et al. (2015b) exploited a novel approach to study the elasticity of the sub-cortical vasculature after cerebral ischemia in rats using an SRA-based spatio-temporal analysis of contrast density in arterial cross sections. Their findings open new avenues in the real-time dynamic multi-functional imaging of cerebral structures at high resolution in living organisms. However, at present, microangiography images in the neuroscience field remain restricted to 2D representations, which limited the precise vessel quantitative analysis. Naturally, for biomedical applications, full four-dimensional (4D) spatiotemporal imaging of a living specimen is highly desirable. With the development of in vivo SR X-ray cine-tomography as a 4D imaging technique, it will be possible to study real-time dynamics accurately in small animals at a micrometre spatial resolution and sub-second time resolution.
4.1.2. High-resolution 3D visualization
In mammals, the complex functions of the brain depend on the fine anatomical architecture of enormous numbers of vessels and their connections. Cerebral perfusion is thus essential for the function of the central nervous system. Notably, 3D high-resolution imaging and deciphering the structural parameters of the cerebrovascular network at both the global and local levels are undoubtedly important prerequisites for the direct assessment of neurovascular disease models.
In a recent study, our group set out to define ultra-high-resolution 3D digitalized angioarchitectural maps of the rodent brain using SR phase-contrast imaging (SR-PCI) (Zhang et al., 2015). We reconstructed multi-angle 3D digital anatomical images, revealing the spatial network of vessels at the whole brain level and in specific brain regions, including the hippocampus, pre-frontal cortex and corpus striatum. At the cellular level, grating interferometry phase and conventional absorption SR-µCT setups were used to investigate the 3D microstructure of the human cerebellum, including blood vessels and different strata (Georg et al., 2010). Individual Purkinje cells were visualized without the use of staining or contrast agents under this imaging setup, demonstrating the superiority of the SR technique for the 3D micro-characterization of microvasculature or individual cells in even the most complex normal brain tissues at the micrometre scale.
Detecting alterations of the microvasculature either qualitatively or quantitatively under diverse pathogenic conditions may provide crucial clues to pathogenic mechanisms. Heinzer et al. (2006) initially proposed a hierarchical microimaging method for multiscale analysis of large microvascular networks in brain vascular corrosion casts. In particular, precise anatomical context for regions of interest (ROIs) scanned for 3D morphology could be nondestructively obtained by SR-µCT at a pixel resolution of 1.4 µm. 3D vessel parameters such as vessel volume, thickness, spacing and connectivity density were calculated sequentially, opening new possibilities to study vessel architecture and vascular alterations in diverse pathological models (Fig. 2).
Additionally, Heinzer et al. (2008) further employed this SR-µCT 3D imaging technique in combination with vascular network analysis tools to characterize brain angioarchitecture in transgenic mice overexpressing human VEGF165. Based on 3D vessel morphometry analysis of ROIs, they hypothesized that the smallest `angiogenic quantum' – the final, stable result of angiogenesis and subsequent remodeling – is not a single microvessel but a complete micro-network. Undoubtedly, this novel technique could also be applied to other experimental systems and may thus contribute to improving our understanding of vascular remodeling in terms of mammalian evolution and pathology. Stolz and co-workers (Stolz et al., 2011) evaluated subacute superior sagittal sinus (SSS) thrombosis in rats using micro-, nano- and synchrotron-based micro-CT. The 3D SR renderings distinctly demonstrated a newly formed network of microvessels (`venogenesis') draining the bridging veins in the SSS at six weeks after thrombosis (Fig. 3).
Similarly, Risser et al. (2009) described the application of the SR 3D technique for functional vessels in a systematic in-depth quantitative study of angiogenesis in the primate cortex that involved the identification of microvascular components as well as their automatic numerical digitalization and extraction via massive 3D image analysis and post-treatments. Over the entire cortical depth, increases in vascular volume, exchange surface and vessel length were revealed in adult marmosets compared with newborns, indicating that intensive remodeling of micro-vascular patterns was accompanied with neural connectivity plasticity during postnatal cortical maturation.
Current bio-medical imaging studies also aim to detect brain tumors and micrometastases in early stages. SR-PCI techniques such as grating interferometry were employed by Pfeiffer et al. (2007) to generate postmortem 3D reconstructions of a rat brain bearing a 9L gliosarcoma, wherein tumor location and important brain structures such as the cerebellum were clearly identified.
Other PCI techniques such as in-line phase-contrast (ILPC) and grating-based phase-contrast imaging are effective enough to provide intuitive visualization of breast cancer micrometastases in an ex vivo mouse brain (Huang et al., 2015). These two SR-PCI techniques can differentiate the abnormal tumorous microstructures induced by micrometastasis from the surrounding normal tissues. In our recent study, we developed an ILPC imaging technique for use in ischemic stroke and provided 3D evidence for angiogenesis (Zhang et al., 2014a; Connor et al., 2009). In addition, amyloid plaques indicative of Alzheimer's disease (AD) have been visualized as small focal masses in the cortex and hippocampus, which are invisible by conventional X-ray absorption imaging techniques due to their small size and weak absorptive properties, in a mouse AD model using SR analyzer-based imaging and grating interferometric methods (Connor et al., 2009; Pinzer et al., 2012). Hence, SR-PCI seems poised to emerge as a powerful tool for depicting the 3D arrangement of the cerebral vasculature in conjunction with a global-local perspective, which may further benefit the development of therapeutic angiogenesis as a clinical tool for application in various neurovascular diseases.
In 2010, Li et al. (2010) developed a micro-optical sectioning tomography (MOST) system based on Golgi staining that generates a 3D brain-wide map of neural circuits at a mesoscale level. The morphology and spatial location of neurons and traces of neurites could be clearly distinguished. Furthermore, a recent study by Kasthuri et al. (2015) developed automated technologies to explore the structure of neural circuits at nanometre resolution using as well as subsequently generated a saturated 3D reconstruction of a sub-volume of mouse neocortex in which all cellular objects and many sub-cellular components were rendered and itemized (Fig. 4).
These two studies open superb prospectives for 3D tomography in neural micro-structure at ultra-high resolution, which lay the foundation to elucidate the in-depth physical properties of brain tissue. However, compared with SR-PCI, these techniques demand sectioned brain tissues, which are more frangible to external force disruption and may affect the sequent 3D reconstruction images in a detrimental way. In the future, the combination of nerve staining and SR techniques will aid in the 3D mapping of neural circuits and vascular network simultaneously within the same intact brain samples at the micrometre, or even nanometre, level.
4.2. Spinal cord vascular system
The spinal cord is the main pathway for information connecting the brain and peripheral nervous system. The function and viability of the spinal cord are critically dependent on the efficient delivery of oxygen and glucose through the microvasculature which is characterised by unique 3D morphology (Mori et al., 1994, 1996; Lu et al., 2010).
4.2.1. In vivo function imaging
With regard to the in vivo visualization of the microvasculature in the central nervous system using SR, there has been broad application in the brain (Zhang et al., 2014b). However, the anatomical features of the spinal cord have made the implementation of in vivo imaging in the study of the living mouse spinal cord a challenging task. The anatomical location of the spinal cord, which is close to the lungs and heart, inevitably generates significant movement artifacts that causes the failure of the in vivo imaging of the spinal cord microvasculature. To address this issue, a proper spine fixing device designed by our research group to restrict the spine motion is being tested.
4.2.2. High-resolution 3D visualization
Until recently, with the application of micro-CT, the 3D morphology of the spinal cord vessel could be detected, and it has been used in different animal models in preclinical experiments such as in chronic spinal cord injury (Cheng et al., 2015; Long et al., 2014) and the acute traumatic injury model (Long et al., 2014) to elucidate the underlying mechanism involved in the vessels that aid in developing novel methods for this treatment (Figley et al., 2014). However, vessels with diameters less than 20 µm could not be captured due to the technique's limited imaging resolution, thus restricting its further application (Hu et al., 2012a). SR offers a unique platform for the characterization of the microvasculature within the intact organ down to the micrometre level. Our group first employed this method to visualize the 3D morphology of the spinal cord microvasculature in a rat model after contrast agent injection (Fig. 5) (Hu et al., 2014).
A clear and precise configuration of the spinal cord microvasculature was provided by this tool. The intrinsic arteries of the spinal cord, including a central and a peripheral vascular system, were vividly detected. Furthermore, the typical butterfly shape of the spinal cord microvasculature in the gray matter was outlined and was more intense than that of the white matter, indicating that the neurons located in the gray matter have higher oxygen and nutritional metabolic demands.
Additionally, we find that SR-µCT could achieve higher resolution in 3D vascular imaging compared with micro-CT, and the smallest vessel that could be distinguished was approximately 7.4 µm in diameter (Hu et al., 2014). When the rat suffered from traumatic injury, the vessel numbers in the damaged spinal cord area decreased significantly, and the injury was not constrained at the epicenter; and it will expand rostrally and caudally along the spinal cord. This result reveals that the structural destruction and volumetric collapse of the microvasculature were directly induced by the acute trauma. This is a devastating event; the importance of blood supply protection should be emphasized in the spinal cord injury process due to the unique hallmark of the circulation system. In addition to SR-µCT-based absorption imaging, X-ray in-line phase-contrast computed tomography (IL-XPCT) was employed. The 3D angioarchitecture of the spinal cord both at normal (Hu et al., 2012b) and injury status (Hu et al., 2015) were successfully obtained via IL-XPCT without the use of a contrast agent.
These results demonstrate that both phase-contrast imaging and absorption imaging-based SR have the capability to image pathological changes in small arteries and may provide crucial clues to illuminate the pathogenic mechanisms underlying this neurovascular diseases. Takashima et al. (2015) have also applied these tools to visualize the microstructure of polyglycolic acid scaffolds and to evaluate their degradation after implantation into injured spinal cords. These studies revealed that SR is a versatile technique with many functions and applications in different fields.
The interaction between nerves and blood vessels in the central nervous system is more complicated than is revealed by our imaging. As a result, much of the fine structure of the neurovascular network remains largely unexplored. Another important application of this method is the investigation and visualization of the interaction between neural and vessel activity within the intact organism. It is now possible, with the aid of SR, to visualize the 3D morphology of the vasculature and neuronal systems in the mouse spinal cord at high resolution. These studies have produced a plethora of novel and unexpected findings regarding neural and vascular activity under physiological or pathological conditions. They have also revealed demarcated tissue borders at the gray or white matter boundaries of the spinal cord. Based on Golgi staining, our group performed preliminary investigation of the application of these imaging techniques to the visualization of the 3D morphology of the neural networks in the spinal cord. Due to the low resolution of our CCD, only the soma of the neurons could be detected.
5. SR imaging data post-processing
5.1. 3D vascular quantitative analysis
To quantitatively analyze vascular structure morphology in 3D, the vessel tree analysis model for vascular structure characterization was used. After the vasculature was segmented from the parenchyma, the following protocol for vascular morphological parameter calculation was performed. (i) Vectorization, a skeletonization based on voxel erosion (Cornea et al.), was used to automatically extract the midline of the vessel. (ii) Once the midline had been successfully extracted, numerous parameters needed for vascular network quantification, such as vessel length, vessel diameter, vessel volume, vessel and vessel bifurcation for each segment in the ROI, could be systematically analyzed (Cornea et al., 2005). A vessel segment was defined as a section of the vascular network lying between two vessel bifurcation points. The vessel length was measurement by the sum of the distances between the two bifurcation points. A 3D Euclidean distance map of the vasculature was evaluated as described previously using the Chamfer Map module in VG Studio Max, Image Pro Analyzer 3D and Amira imaging software to determine the 3D vessel radius. The vessel diameter was calculated from the vessel radius (Rm) as the mean radius Rm leading to the mean diameter (D = 2Rm). The vessel represents the ratio between the number of voxels belonging to a given vessel and the total number of voxels in the biological tissue (Lang et al., 2012).
5.2. 3D virtual micro-endoscopy
In addition to the quantitative analysis of 3D vasculature, more in-depth 3D data exploration can be conducted. For instance, virtual cerebrovascular micro-endoscopy can be performed based on SR data (Fig. 6) (Zhang et al., 2015).
This process includes path planning and real-time rendering, and enables the simulation of virtual camera recordings moving dynamically through a targeted vessel lumen. By setting the position and orientation of the camera along the pathway within the vessel, `virtual flight' enables the visualization of vessels from this novel perspective. This innovation will make it possible to localize relevant blood vessels and to non-invasively measure pathological changes in various models of vascular diseases. It also provides a potential method for monitoring and targeting drug delivery during functional vascular mapping studies.
5.3. Blood flow simulation
Understanding the 3D structure of microvasculature alone is often not sufficient because the regulation of organ perfusion is closely related to the alteration of vascular morphology via a process termed autoregulation. Recently, thanks to the acquisition of low-resolution images of spinal cord vessels obtained via conventional methods, several studies have examined the parameters of vasculature hemodynamics. The high-resolution morphology law data derived via SR have made it possible to relate the geometric information obtained from vascular images to the functional properties of vascular circulation. The morphology–function relationship of the vascular tree allows us to simulate the dynamic blood flow in the extracted imaged vascular system. The pressure distribution within the arteries as well as changes in flow velocity can be detected (Fig. 7). Additionally, anatomical, hemodynamic and functional information could be obtained from SR images and represents an important new step in the diagnosis of specific vascular diseases (Holme et al., 2014; Zhang et al., 2011).
5.4. Pseudo color display
The SR imaging technique provides massive amounts of high-resolution raw imaging of blood vessels within intact organs. However, the 3D nature and high complexity of the vasculature complicates the recognition and analysis of the vessel network. To analyze the vascular connectivity of the central nervous system in a tractable manner, the local vascular features are automatically labeled using different colors. This methodology has already been validated for brain imaging (Ghanavati et al., 2014); the length, diameter and relational features as well as connections representing each of the vessel segments in the spinal cord could be labeled with an anatomical name using different colors, thereby enabling a detailed and high-quality 3D analysis. Additionally, the spinal cord microvasculature illuminated by segmentation could be color-coded by vessel thickness (Fig. 8) (Cao et al., 2015), systematically illustrating the structural characteristics of vasculature and tracing variations in target vascular.
5.5. Virtual histology
In addition to imaging entire organs, morphology may also be determined for macroscopic physiological slices. Using the techniques presented here, the 3D data generated by SR-CT are directly converted into voxel data volumes and can be modified into thousands of serial virtual slices at multiple thicknesses or orientations, thereby allowing the region of interest of the object to be virtually manipulated (Qu et al., 2015). This technique allows us to explore the otherwise inaccessible morphology of an object, increasing our ability to recognize patterns in a nondestructive manner that can be used to obtain the complete 3D structure of a specimen.
6. Limitations of current research and future directions
CLARITY is a novel tissue clearing technique which processes intact biological tissues into a nanoporous hydrogel-tissue hybrid, thus preserving anatomical structures, proteins and et al., 2013). The hydrogel-based structures present transparent states after the disposal of Popular with researchers in neuroscience and developmental biology, this technique provides an ideal way to visualize the intact mouse brain and spinal cord in the central nervous system (Du et al., 2018). Unfortunately, a considerable time investment is required from tissue clearing to the acquisition of imaging data. Furthermore, large and thick samples pose a sizable challenge in achieving an optimized level of transparency for successive imaging (Kazuki et al., 2014). The CLARITY imaging process, involving a two-photon microscope to generate the three-dimensional fluorescent images, is not feasible for high-resolution 3D volume imaging approaches due to the current limitations. The culmination of factors, namely poor limiting the scale of samples, a complicated processing procedure and the time-consuming nature of image generation requiring point by point scanning, warrant the need for a simplified and efficient alternative (Kwanghun et al., 2013; Ragan et al., 2012; Raju et al., 2014). In addition, attention needs to be paid to monitor the potential phototoxicity when conducting laser tomography. Conversely, the preparation for SR-µCT is not complicated with the ability to rapidly scan the intact sample thus acquiring ultra-high-resolution 3D images due to the monochromaticitic, high high collimation, high polarization SR X-rays (Luo et al., 2019).
(KwanghunThere are many advantages of the current imaging approach for neurovascular detection. However, the technical restrictions of today's SR methodology prevent its further application. Most apparent physically is that the SR apparatus is large, which may restrict availability to all academic research laboratories and limit its application in clinical institutions. Future work should ameliorate and miniaturize the SR apparatus and optimize the scanning parameters such that they are suitable for clinical application. Furthermore, due to the limited image field of the detector, SR beam light is not ideal for use in large animals. Despite the difficulties of this technique, satisfactory results have been achieved with intravenous KEDSA dual-energy CT, and in vivo imaging of the cerebral vascular network in large animals has been performed successfully (Schültke et al., 2010, 2011). This study indicated that SR can be employed for neurovascular research and that it has the potential to translate from use in larger animals to clinical practice. In addition, high-resolution imaging necessitates long scanning and exposure times, which inevitably results in the delivery of higher radiation doses to the specimen. Current efforts must work to optimize imaging parameters and decrease the radiation doses required prior to application in the medical field. SR angiography is an important approach to studying the brain vasculature in real time and dynamically in vivo; however, currently it cannot make 3D images. In theory, it will be possible to perform fast and complete 4D spatiotemporal SR phase-contrast imaging of living rodents in the near future. If the scanning time is decreased significantly, the radiation dose will also decrease accordingly. Another challenge is the simultaneous 3D visualization and quantitative analysis of both the micro-vascular network and the neuronal system. Recent studies have verified that SR-µCT allowed the 3D simultaneous visualization of the single neuron and vessel network in mouse spinal cord on the sub-micrometre scale; however, the complex interaction mapping needs to be further elucidated in depth (Fratini et al., 2015). The presented method will be a promising platform in a broad range of future life science to break through the traditional applications, such as 3D printing, tissue engineering, drug discovery, and the possible combination with other SR microspectrum analysis methods to analyze biochemical and morphological characteristics in depth.
7. Conclusion
Undoubtedly, SR X-ray imaging has proven to be a powerful tool for exploring neurovascular network morphology. Coupled with the computerized tomography, SR-µCT allows us to non-destructively image the microvasculature network at the sub-micrometre scale. Additionally, by way of SR phase-contrast µCT, the detection and identification of changes in microvessels can be achieved without the use of a contrast agent, offering a new platform and a powerful imaging technique for better understanding the complex biological interactions between vascular function and neuronal activity in the central nervous system under both physiological and pathological conditions.
Footnotes
‡These authors contributed equally to this work.
Acknowledgements
We thank our collaborators and colleagues working in the field of biomedical applications of synchrotron radiation for making their latest results available. We are very grateful to the staff of Shanghai Synchrotron Radiation Facility for their kind help in preparing this manuscript. We thank the authors, editors and publishers for their kind permission to reprint illustrations of previously published results.
Funding information
The following funding is acknowledged: National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant Nos. 81501025, 81371956, 81171698, 81672174, 81730068, 81472072, 81171699, 61772556); Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province (grant Nos. 2016JJ3174, 2017JJ2330); Science Foundation of Xiangya Hospital for Young Scholar (grant No. 2017Q1); Changsha Science and Technology Plan Key Project (grant No. kq1801066); The Science and Technology Commission of Hunan Province of China (grant No. 2017SK2061).
References
Ackermann, M. & Konerding, M. A. (2015). Methods Mol. Biol. 1214, 49–66. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Bilderback, D. H., Elleaume, P. & Weckert, E. (2005). J. Phys. B At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 38, S773–S797. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Bravin, A., Coan, P. & Suortti, P. (2013). Phys. Med. Biol. 58, R1–R35. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Cao, Y., Wu, T., Yuan, Z., Li, D., Ni, S., Hu, J. & Lu, H. (2015). Sci. Rep. 5, 12643. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Chen, R.-C., Dreossi, D., Mancini, L., Menk, R., Rigon, L., Xiao, T.-Q. & Longo, R. (2012). J. Synchrotron Rad. 19, 836–845. Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Chen, R. C., Liu, P., Xiao, T. Q. & Xu, L. X. (2014). Adv. Mater. 26, 7688–7691. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Cheng, X., Long, H. Q., Chen, W. L,, Xu, J. H., Huang, Y. L. & Li, F. B. (2015). Neurosci. Lett. 606, 106–112. Google Scholar
Connor, D. M., Benveniste, H., Dilmanian, F. A., Kritzer, M. F., Miller, L. M. & Zhong, Z. (2009). Neuroimage, 46, 908–914. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Cornea, N. D., Silver, D., Yuan, X. S. & Balasubramanian, R. (2005). Vis. Comput. 21, 945–955. Web of Science CrossRef Google Scholar
Diemoz, P. C., Bravin, A. & Coan, P. (2012). Opt. Express, 20, 2789–2805. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Du, H., Hou, P. H., Zhang, W. B. & Li, Q. Y. (2018). Exp. Ther. Med. 16, 1567–1576. Web of Science PubMed Google Scholar
Figley, S. A., Khosravi, R., Legasto, J. M., Tseng, Y. F. & Fehlings, M. G. (2014). J. Neurotrauma, 31, 541–552. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Fratini, M., Bukreeva, I., Campi, G., Brun, F., Tromba, G., Modregger, P., Bucci, D., Battaglia, G., Spanò, R., Mastrogiacomo, M., Requardt, H., Giove, F., Bravin, A. & Cedola, A. (2015). Sci. Rep. 5, 8514. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Georg, S., Timm, W., Irene, Z., Franz, P., Felix, B., Christian, D., Simon, R., Elena, R. & Bert, M. (2010). J. R. Soc. Interface, 7, 1665–1676. Web of Science PubMed Google Scholar
Ghanavati, S., Lerch, J. P. & Sled, J. G. (2014). Neuroimage, 95, 117–128. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Guan, Y., Wang, Y., Yuan, F., Lu, H., Ren, Y., Xiao, T., Chen, K., Greenberg, D. A., Jin, K. & Yang, G. Y. (2012). Stroke, 43, 888–891. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Hagen, C. K., Maghsoudlou, P., Totonelli, G., Diemoz, P. C., Endrizzi, M., Rigon, L., Menk, R. H., Arfelli, F., Dreossi, D., Brun, E., Coan, P., Bravin, A., De Coppi, P. & Olivo, A. (2015). Sci. Rep. 5, 18156. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Heinzer, S., Krucker, T., Stampanoni, M., Abela, R., Meyer, E. P., Schuler, A., Schneider, P. & Müller, R. (2006). Neuroimage, 32, 626–636. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Heinzer, S., Kuhn, G., Krucker, T., Meyer, E., Ulmann-Schuler, A., Stampanoni, M., Gassmann, M., Marti, H. H., Müller, R. & Vogel, J. (2008). Neuroimage, 39, 1549–1558. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Hofmann, A. (1990). Characteristics of Synchrotron Radiation, CERN. Report, pp. 115–141. CERN, Geneva, Switzerland. Google Scholar
Holme, M. N., Schulz, G., Deyhle, H., Weitkamp, T., Beckmann, F., Lobrinus, J. A., Rikhtegar, F., Kurtcuoglu, V., Zanette, I., Saxer, T. & Müller, B. (2014). Nat. Protoc. 9, 1401–1415. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Hu, J., Cao, Y., Wu, T., Li, D. & Lu, H. (2015). Spinal Cord, 53, 585–590. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Hu, J. Z., Cao, Y., Wu, T. D., Li, D. Z. & Lu, H. B. (2014). Med. Phys. 41, 101904. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Hu, J. Z., Wu, T. D., Zeng, L., Liu, H. Q., He, Y., Du, G. H. & Lu, H. B. (2012b). Phys. Med. Biol. 57, N55–N63. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Hu, J. Z., Wu, T. D., Zhang, T., Zhao, Y. F., Pang, J. & Lu, H. B. (2012a). J. Neurosci. Methods, 204, 150–158. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Huang, S., Kou, B. Q., Chi, Y. Y., Xi, Y., Cao, Y. X., Cui, W. L., Hu, X., Shao, Z. M., Guo, H., Fu, Y., Xiao, T., Sun, J., Zhao, J., Wang, Y. & Wu, J. (2015). Sci. Rep. 5, 9418. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Hwu, Y., Tsai, W. L., Je, J. H., Seol, S. K., Kim, B., Groso, A., Margaritondo, G., Lee, K. H. & Seong, J. K. (2004). Phys. Med. Biol. 49, 501–508. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Kasthuri, N., Hayworth, K. J., Berger, D. R., Schalek, R. L., Conchello, J. A., Knowles-Barley, S., Lee, D., Vázquez-Reina, A., Kaynig, V., Jones, T. R., Roberts, M., Morgan, J. L., Tapia, J. C., Seung, H. S., Roncal, W. G., Vogelstein, J. T., Burns, R., Sussman, D. L., Priebe, C. E., Pfister, H. & Lichtman, J. W. (2015). Cell, 162, 648–661. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Kazuki, T., Shimpei, I. K., Takeru, Q. S., Etsuo, A. S., Dimitri, P., Maki, U., Hideki, U. & Hiroki, R. U. (2014). Cell, 159, 911–924. Web of Science PubMed Google Scholar
Kidoguchi, K., Tamaki, M., Mizobe, T., Koyama, J., Kondoh, T., Kohmura, E., Sakurai, T., Yokono, K. & Umetani, K. (2006). Stroke, 37, 1856–1861. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Kobayashi, S., Hori, M., Dono, K., Nagano, H., Umeshita, K., Nakamori, S., Sakon, M., Osuga, K., Umetani, K., Murakami, T., Nakamura, H. & Monden, M. (2004). J. Hepatol. 40, 405–408. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Krings, T. (2010). Clin. Neuroradiol. 20, 5–24. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Kwanghun, C., Jenelle, W., Sung-Yon, K., Sandhiya, K., Aaron, S. A., Thomas, J. D., Julie, J. M., Kelly, A. Z., Joanna, M., Aleksandra, K. D., Sally, P., Hannah, B., Charu, R., Logan, G., Viviana, G. & Karl, D. (2013). Struct. Mol. Interrogation Intact Biol. Syst. Nat. 497, 332–337. Google Scholar
Lang, S., Müller, B., Dominietto, M. D., Cattin, P. C., Zanette, I., Weitkamp, T. & Hieber, S. E. (2012). Microvasc. Res. 84, 314–322. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Larrue, A., Rattner, A., Peter, Z. A., Olivier, C., Laroche, N., Vico, L. & Peyrin, F. (2011). PLoS One, 6, e21297. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Lewis, R. (1997). Phys. Med. Biol. 42, 1213–1243. CrossRef CAS PubMed Web of Science Google Scholar
Li, A. A., Gong, H., Zhang, B., Wang, Q. D., Yan, C., Wu, J. P., Liu, Q. A., Zeng, S. Q. & Luo, Q. M. (2010). Science, 330, 1404–1408. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Lin, H. M., Kou, B. Q., Li, X. T., Wang, Y. J., Ding, B., Shi, C., Liu, H. H., Tang, R. B., Sun, J. Q., Yan, F. H. & Zhang, H. (2015a). PLoS One, 10, e0121438. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Lin, X., Miao, P., Mu, Z., Jiang, Z., Lu, Y., Guan, Y., Chen, X., Xiao, T., Wang, Y. & Yang, G. Y. (2015b). Phys. Med. Biol. 60, 1655–1665. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Liu, P., Sun, J., Zhao, J., Liu, X., Gu, X., Li, J., Xiao, T. & Xu, L. X. (2010). J. Synchrotron Rad. 17, 517–521. Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Long, H. Q., Xie, W. H., Chen, W. L., Xie, W. L., Xu, J. H. & Hu, Y. (2014). Int. J. Mol. Sci. 15, 12061–12073. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Longo, R. (2016). Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A, 809, 13–22. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Lu, H., Wang, Y., He, X., Yuan, F., Lin, X., Xie, B., Tang, G., Huang, J., Tang, Y., Jin, K., Chen, S. & Yang, G. Y. (2012). Stroke, 43, 838–843. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Lu, H. B., Zheng, C., Wang, Z. W., Chen, C., Chen, H. B. & Hu, J. Z. (2015). PLoS One, 10, e0124724. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Lu, W. F., Dong, Z. H., Liu, Z. J., Fu, W. G., Peng, Y. F., Chen, S. L., Xiao, T. Q., Xie, H. L., Du, G. H., Deng, B. A. & Zhang, X. (2010). J. Surg. Res. 164, e193–e199. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Lundström, U., Larsson, D. H., Burvall, A., Takman, P. A. C., Scott, L., Brismar, H. & Hertz, H. M. (2012). Phys. Med. Biol. 57, 2603–2617. Web of Science PubMed Google Scholar
Luo, Y. H., Yin, X. Z., Shi, S. P., Ren, X. L., Zhang, H. R., Wang, Z. L., Cao, Y., Tang, M. M., Xiao, B. & Zhang, M. Q. (2019). Front. Neuroanat. 13, doi:10.3389/fnana.2019.00005. Web of Science CrossRef Google Scholar
Marín-Padilla, M. (2012). Front. Neuroanat. 6, 38. Web of Science PubMed Google Scholar
Martirosyan, N. L., Feuerstein, J. S., Theodore, N., Cavalcanti, D. D., Spetzler, R. F. & Preul, M. C. (2011). J. Neurosurg. Spine, 15, 238–251. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Meuli, R., Hwu, Y., Je, J. H. & Margaritondo, G. (2004). Eur. Radiol. 14, 1550–1560. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Momose, A., Takeda, T., Itai, Y. & Hirano, K. (1996). Nat. Med. 2, 473–475. CrossRef CAS PubMed Web of Science Google Scholar
Mori, H., Hyodo, K., Tanaka, E., Uddin-Mohammed, M., Yamakawa, A., Shinozaki, Y., Nakazawa, H., Tanaka, Y., Sekka, T., Iwata, Y., Handa, S., Umetani, K., Ueki, H., Yokoyama, T., Tanioka, K., Kubota, M., Hosaka, H., Ishikawa, N. & Ando, M. (1996). Radiology, 201, 173–177. CrossRef CAS PubMed Web of Science Google Scholar
Mori, H., Hyodo, K., Tobita, K., Chujo, M., Shinozaki, Y., Sugishita, Y. & Ando, M. (1994). Circulation, 89, 863–871. CrossRef CAS PubMed Web of Science Google Scholar
Mouchtouris, N., Jabbour, P. M., Starke, R. M., Hasan, D. M., Zanaty, M., Theofanis, T., Ding, D., Tjoumakaris, S. I., Dumont, A. S., Ghobrial, G. M., Kung, D., Rosenwasser, R. H. & Chalouhi, N. (2015). J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 35, 167–175. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Mu, Z. H., Jiang, Z., Lin, X. J., Wang, L. P., Xi, Y., Zhang, Z. J., Wang, Y. T. & Yang, G. Y. (2016). CNS Neurosci. Ther. 22, 316–324. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Myojin, K., Taguchi, A., Umetani, K., Fukushima, K., Nishiura, N., Matsuyama, T., Kimura, H., Stern, D. M., Imai, Y. & Mori, H. (2007). Am. J. Neuroradiol. 28, 953–957. Web of Science PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Pabst, A. M., Ackermann, M., Wagner, W., Haberthür, D., Ziebart, T. & Konerding, M. A. (2014). J. Cranio-Maxillofac. Surg. 42, 915–923. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Peterzol, A., Bravin, A., Coan, P. & Elleaume, H. (2005). Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 117, 44–49. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Pfeiffer, F., Bunk, O., David, C., Bech, M., Le Duc, G., Bravin, A. & Cloetens, P. (2007). Phys. Med. Biol. 52, 6923–6930. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Pinzer, B. R., Cacquevel, M., Modregger, P., McDonald, S. A., Bensadoun, J. C., Thuering, T., Aebischer, P. & Stampanoni, M. (2012). Neuroimage, 61, 1336–1346. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Qu, Q. M., Blom, H., Sanchez, S. & Ahlberg, P. (2015). J. Morphol. 276, 873–888. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Rabin, O., Manuel Perez, J., Grimm, J., Wojtkiewicz, G. & Weissleder, R. (2006). Nat. Mater. 5, 118–122. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Ragan, T., Kadiri, L. R., Venkataraju, K. U., Bahlmann, K., Sutin, J., Taranda, J., Arganda-Carreras, I., Kim, Y., Seung, H. S. & Osten, P. (2012). Nat. Methods, 9, 255–258. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Raju, T., Li, Y., Brian, H. & Karl, D. (2014). Nat. Protoc. 9, 1682–1697. Web of Science PubMed Google Scholar
Risser, L., Plouraboué, F., Cloetens, P. & Fonta, C. (2009). Int. J. Dev. Neurosci. 27, 185–196. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Risser, L., Plouraboué, F., Steyer, A., Cloetens, P., Le Duc, G. & Fonta, C. (2007). J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 27, 293–303. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Rubenstein, E., Hofstadter, R., Zeman, H. D., Thompson, A. C., Otis, J. N., Brown, G. S., Giacomini, J. C., Gordon, H. J., Kernoff, R. S. & Harrison, D. C. (1986). Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 83, 9724–9728. CrossRef CAS PubMed Web of Science Google Scholar
Schültke, E., Fiedler, S., Nemoz, C., Ogieglo, L., Kelly, M. E., Crawford, P., Esteve, F., Brochard, T., Renier, M., Requardt, H., Le Duc, G., Juurlink, B. & Meguro, K. (2010). Eur. J. Radiol. 73, 677–681. Web of Science PubMed Google Scholar
Schültke, E., Kelly, M. E., Nemoz, C., Fiedler, S., Ogieglo, L., Crawford, P., Paterson, J., Beavis, C., Esteve, F., Brochard, T., Renier, M., Requardt, H., Dallery, D., Le Duc, G. & Meguro, K. (2011). Eur. J. Radiol. 79, 323–327. Web of Science PubMed Google Scholar
Shirai, M., Schwenke, D. O., Eppel, G. A., Evans, R. G., Edgley, A. J., Tsuchimochi, H., Umetani, K. & Pearson, J. T. (2009). Clin. Exp. Pharmacol. Physiol. 36, 107–116. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Shirai, M., Schwenke, D. O., Tsuchimochi, H., Umetani, K., Yagi, N. & Pearson, J. T. (2013). Circ. Res. 112, 209–221. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Stevenson, A. W., Gureyev, T. E., Paganin, D., Wilkins, S. W., Weitkamp, T., Snigirev, A., Rau, C., Snigireva, I., Youn, H. S., Dolbnya, I. P., Yun, W., Lai, B., Garrett, R. F., Cookson, D. J., Hyodo, K. & Ando, M. (2003). Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. B, 199, 427–435. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Stolz, E., Yeniguen, M., Kreisel, M., Kampschulte, M., Doenges, S., Sedding, D., Ritman, E. L., Gerriets, T. & Langheinrich, A. C. (2011). Neuroimage, 54, 1881–1886. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Suortti, P. & Thomlinson, W. (2003). Phys. Med. Biol. 48, R1–R35. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Takashima, K., Hoshino, M., Uesugi, K., Yagi, N., Matsuda, S., Nakahira, A., Osumi, N., Kohzuki, M. & Onodera, H. (2015). J. Synchrotron Rad. 22, 136–142. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Tang, R. B., Xi, Y., Chai, W. M., Wang, Y. T., Guan, Y. J., Yang, G. Y., Xie, H. L. & Chen, K. M. (2011). Phys. Med. Biol. 56, 3503–3512. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Tapfer, A., Bech, M., Zanette, I., Symvoulidis, P., Stangl, S., Multhoff, G., Molls, M., Ntziachristos, V. & Pfeiffer, F. (2014). J. Microsc. 253, 24–30. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Velroyen, A., Bech, M., Zanette, I., Schwarz, J., Rack, A., Tympner, C., Herrler, T., Staab-Weijnitz, C., Braunagel, M., Reiser, M., Bamberg, F., Pfeiffer, F. & Notohamiprodjo, M. (2014). PLoS One, 9, e109562. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Wang, L. P., Mu, Z. H., Lin, X., Geng, J., Xiao, T. Q., Zhang, Z., Wang, Y., Guan, Y. & Yang, G.-Y. (2016). Front. Aging Neurosci. 9, 359. Web of Science CrossRef Google Scholar
Xi, Y., Kou, B., Sun, H., Qi, J., Sun, J., Mohr, J., Börner, M., Zhao, J., Xu, L. X., Xiao, T. & Wang, Y. (2012). J. Synchrotron Rad. 19, 821–826. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Xi, Y., Lin, X. J., Yuan, F. L., Yang, G. Y. & Zhao, J. (2015). Comput. Math. Method. Med. 2015, 530580. Web of Science CrossRef Google Scholar
Yamashita, T., Kawashima, S., Ozaki, M., Namiki, M., Shinohara, M., Inoue, N., Hirata, K., Umetani, K. & Yokoyama, M. (2002). Circ. J. 66, 1057–1059. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Yuan, F. L., Tang, Y. H., Lin, X. J., Xi, Y., Guan, Y. J., Xiao, T. Q., Chen, J., Zhang, Z. J., Yang, G. Y. & Wang, Y. T. (2012). J. Neurotrauma, 29, 1499–1505. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Zernike, F. (1955). Science, 121, 345–349. CrossRef PubMed CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Zhang, L., Hu, C. H., Zhao, T. & Luo, S. Q. (2011). Eur. J. Radiol. 80, 158–162. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Zhang, M. Q., Peng, G. Y., Sun, D. N., Xie, Y. Y., Xia, J., Long, H. Y., Hu, K. & Xiao, B. (2014b). Med. Phys. 41, 031907. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Zhang, M. Q., Sun, D. N., Xie, Y. Y., Peng, G. Y., Xia, J., Long, H. Y. & Xiao, B. (2014a). Br. J. Radiol. 87, 20130670. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Zhang, M. Q., Zhou, L., Deng, Q. F., Xie, Y. Y., Xiao, T. Q., Cao, Y. Z., Zhang, J. W., Chen, X. M., Yin, X. Z. & Xiao, B. (2015). Sci. Rep. 5, 14982. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Zhao, J. J., Lin, X. J., He, C., Yang, G. Y. & Ling, F. (2015). J. Clin. Neurosci. 22, 373–377. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Zhao, Y., Brun, E., Coan, P., Huang, Z., Sztrókay, A., Diemoz, P. C., Liebhardt, S., Mittone, A., Gasilov, S., Miao, J. & Bravin, A. (2012). Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 109, 18290–18294. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Zhu, P., Zhang, K., Wang, Z., Liu, Y., Liu, X., Wu, Z., McDonald, S. A., Marone, F. & Stampanoni, M. (2010). Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 107, 13576–13581. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
© International Union of Crystallography. Prior permission is not required to reproduce short quotations, tables and figures from this article, provided the original authors and source are cited. For more information, click here.