PHENIX: building new software for automated crystallographic structure determination

Adams, P.D.; Grosse-Kunstleve, R.W.; Hung, L.-W.; Ioerger, T.R.; McCoy, A.J.; Moriarty, N.W.; Read, R.J.; Sacchettini, J.C.; Sauter, N.K.; Terwilliger, T.C.

doi:10.1107/S0907444902016657

Acta Crystallographica Section D
Acta Crystallographica
Section D BIOLOGICAL CRYSTALLOGRAPHY

IUCr IT WDC

home archive editors for authors for readers submit subscribe open access

view article

Figure 2
C++ (a) and Python (b) interfaces for PHENIX code. The two code samples use as similar a syntax as is permissible by the constraints of the respective languages, yet the first is compiled and the second interpreted. There is a performance penalty associated with running a scripting language. However, because the majority of the time is spent in the compiled C++ routines, the execution times for the two interfaces are roughly equivalent on all platforms tested.

BIOLOGICAL
CRYSTALLOGRAPHY

ISSN: 1399-0047

Volume 58| Part 11| October 2002| Pages 1948-1954

doi:10.1107/S0907444902016657

Follow Acta Cryst. D

Search term		doi		Advanced search
Author		volume	page