![[HTML version]](/e/graphics/htmlborder.gif)
![[PDF version]](/e/graphics/pdfborder.gif)
![[Article Abstract]](/e/graphics/abstractborder.gif)
![[CIF]](/e/graphics/cifborder.gif)
![[3d view]](/e/graphics/3dviewborder.gif)
![[Structure Factors]](/e/graphics/structurefactorsborder.gif)
![[Buy article online]](/logos/buy.gif)
![[Contents scheme]](bt6109contents.gif)
Acta Cryst. (2002). E58, m90-m92 [ doi:10.1107/S1600536802002404 ]
P]gold(III) dichloromethane solvateOnline 22 February 2002
No syntax errors found ADDSYM reports no extra symmetryAlert Level B:
ABSTM_02 Alert B The ratio of expected to reported Tmax/Tmin(RR) is > 1.50 Tmin and Tmax reported: 0.527 0.960 Tmin and Tmax expected: 0.195 0.593 RR = 1.670 Please check that your absorption correction is appropriate.
| Author response: Despite eminently sensible-looking psi-scans, the minimum transmission is not as low as expected. Possible reasons: (i) The crystal size may be slightly inaccurate (oildrop) or (ii) No X-ray beam actually traversed the longest crystal dimension. |
Alert Level C:
PLAT_202 Alert C Isotropic non-H Atoms in Anion/Solvent = 1 PLAT_213 Alert C Atom F3 has ADP max/min Ratio ........... 3.10 prolate PLAT_302 Alert C Anion/Solvent Disorder ....................... 50.00 Perc. PLAT_420 Alert C D-H Without Acceptor S - H0 ? PLAT_731 Alert C Bond Calc 1.33(5), Rep 1.331(19) .... 2.63 s.u-Ratio S -H0 1.555 1.555 General Notes
ABSTM_02 When printed, the submitted absorption T values will be replaced by the scaled T values. Since the ratio of scaled T's is identical to the ratio of reported T values, the scaling does not imply a change to the absorption corrections used in the study. Ratio of Tmax expected/reported 0.618 Tmax scaled 0.593 Tmin scaled 0.326
0 Alert Level A = Potentially serious problem
1 Alert Level B = Potential problem
5 Alert Level C = Please check
Copyright © International Union of Crystallography
IUCr Webmaster