![[HTML version]](/e/graphics/htmlborder.gif)
![[PDF version]](/e/graphics/pdfborder.gif)
![[Article Abstract]](/e/graphics/abstractborder.gif)
![[CIF]](/e/graphics/cifborder.gif)
![[3d view]](/e/graphics/3dviewborder.gif)
![[Structure Factors]](/e/graphics/structurefactorsborder.gif)
![[Buy article online]](/logos/buy.gif)
![[Contents scheme]](ob6412contents.gif)
Acta Cryst. (2004). E60, o1764-o1766 [ doi:10.1107/S1600536804022068 ]
Online 18 September 2004
No syntax errors found
Alert level A PLAT035_ALERT_1_A No _chemical_absolute_configuration info given . ? PLAT241_ALERT_2_A Check High U(eq) as Compared to Neighbors for N1 PLAT241_ALERT_2_A Check High U(eq) as Compared to Neighbors for N2 PLAT242_ALERT_2_A Check Low U(eq) as Compared to Neighbors for C1
Alert level B PLAT242_ALERT_2_B Check Low U(eq) as Compared to Neighbors for Cl1 PLAT242_ALERT_2_B Check Low U(eq) as Compared to Neighbors for Cl2
Alert level C ABSTM02_ALERT_3_C The ratio of expected to reported Tmax/Tmin(RR') is < 0.90 Tmin and Tmax reported: 0.821 0.960 Tmin' and Tmax expected: 0.921 0.960 RR' = 0.892 Please check that your absorption correction is appropriate. PLAT061_ALERT_3_C Tmax/Tmin Range Test RR' too Large ............. 0.89 PLAT125_ALERT_4_C No _symmetry_space_group_name_Hall Given ....... ? PLAT215_ALERT_3_C Disordered N2 has ADP max/min Ratio ....... 3.80 PLAT241_ALERT_2_C Check High U(eq) as Compared to Neighbors for O1 PLAT301_ALERT_3_C Main Residue Disorder ......................... 17.00 Perc. PLAT480_ALERT_4_C Long H...A H-Bond Reported H2B .. O1 .. 2.69 Ang. PLAT480_ALERT_4_C Long H...A H-Bond Reported H3B .. O2 .. 2.71 Ang. PLAT480_ALERT_4_C Long H...A H-Bond Reported H4A .. O2 .. 2.91 Ang. PLAT779_ALERT_2_C Suspect or Irrelevant (Bond) Angle in CIF ...... 15.00 Deg. N2 -C1 -CL1 1.555 1.555 1.555 PLAT779_ALERT_2_C Suspect or Irrelevant (Bond) Angle in CIF ...... 12.80 Deg. N1 -C1 -CL2 1.555 1.555 1.555 PLAT850_ALERT_2_C Check Flack Parameter Exact Value 0.00 and su .. 0.10
Alert level G REFLT03_ALERT_4_G Please check that the estimate of the number of Friedel pairs is correct. If it is not, please give the correct count in the _publ_section_exptl_refinement section of the submitted CIF. From the CIF: _diffrn_reflns_theta_max 28.05 From the CIF: _reflns_number_total 3072 Count of symmetry unique reflns 1833 Completeness (_total/calc) 167.59% TEST3: Check Friedels for noncentro structure Estimate of Friedel pairs measured 1239 Fraction of Friedel pairs measured 0.676 Are heavy atom types Z>Si present yes
4 ALERT level A = In general: serious problem 2 ALERT level B = Potentially serious problem 12 ALERT level C = Check and explain 1 ALERT level G = General alerts; check 1 ALERT type 1 CIF construction/syntax error, inconsistent or missing data 9 ALERT type 2 Indicator that the structure model may be wrong or deficient 4 ALERT type 3 Indicator that the structure quality may be low 5 ALERT type 4 Improvement, methodology, query or suggestion
Copyright © International Union of Crystallography
IUCr Webmaster