![[HTML version]](/e/graphics/htmlborder.gif)
![[PDF version]](/e/graphics/pdfborder.gif)
![[Article Abstract]](/e/graphics/abstractborder.gif)
![[CIF]](/e/graphics/cifborder.gif)
![[3d view]](/e/graphics/3dviewborder.gif)
![[Structure Factors]](/e/graphics/structurefactorsborder.gif)
![[Buy article online]](/logos/buy.gif)
![[Contents scheme]](er6006contents.gif)
Acta Cryst. (2005). E61, o690-o692 [ doi:10.1107/S1600536805001029 ]
O and C-H
interactionsOnline 19 February 2005
No syntax errors found
Alert level B PLAT480_ALERT_4_B Long H...A H-Bond Reported H2 .. O2 .. 2.99 Ang. PLAT480_ALERT_4_B Long H...A H-Bond Reported H7B .. O2 .. 2.98 Ang. PLAT480_ALERT_4_B Long H...A H-Bond Reported H11 .. CG1 .. 3.33 Ang.
Alert level C DIFMN02_ALERT_2_C The minimum difference density is < -0.1*ZMAX*0.75 _refine_diff_density_min given = -1.402 Test value = -1.200 DIFMN03_ALERT_1_C The minimum difference density is < -0.1*ZMAX*0.75 The relevant atom site should be identified. PLAT098_ALERT_2_C Minimum (Negative) Residual Density ............ -1.40 e/A 3 PLAT340_ALERT_3_C Low Bond Precision on C-C bonds (x 1000) Ang ... 5 PLAT480_ALERT_4_C Long H...A H-Bond Reported H2 .. O2 .. 2.76 Ang. PLAT480_ALERT_4_C Long H...A H-Bond Reported H9 .. O1 .. 2.83 Ang. PLAT480_ALERT_4_C Long H...A H-Bond Reported H2 .. O1 .. 2.83 Ang. PLAT480_ALERT_4_C Long H...A H-Bond Reported H13 .. O1 .. 2.76 Ang. PLAT480_ALERT_4_C Long H...A H-Bond Reported H5 .. O3 .. 2.78 Ang. PLAT480_ALERT_4_C Long H...A H-Bond Reported H5 .. O2 .. 2.76 Ang. PLAT480_ALERT_4_C Long H...A H-Bond Reported H10 .. O3 .. 2.89 Ang. PLAT480_ALERT_4_C Long H...A H-Bond Reported H9 .. CG2 .. 2.92 Ang. PLAT480_ALERT_4_C Long H...A H-Bond Reported H12 .. CG2 .. 3.08 Ang. PLAT481_ALERT_4_C Long D...A H-Bond Reported C2 .. O2 .. 3.76 Ang. PLAT481_ALERT_4_C Long D...A H-Bond Reported C11 .. CG1 .. 4.09 Ang. PLAT482_ALERT_4_C Small D-H..A Angle Rep for C2 .. O2 .. 99.00 Deg. PLAT482_ALERT_4_C Small D-H..A Angle Rep for C9 .. O1 .. 95.00 Deg.
Alert level G REFLT03_ALERT_4_G Please check that the estimate of the number of Friedel pairs is correct. If it is not, please give the correct count in the _publ_section_exptl_refinement section of the submitted CIF. From the CIF: _diffrn_reflns_theta_max 30.04 From the CIF: _reflns_number_total 3277 Count of symmetry unique reflns 1891 Completeness (_total/calc) 173.29% TEST3: Check Friedels for noncentro structure Estimate of Friedel pairs measured 1386 Fraction of Friedel pairs measured 0.733 Are heavy atom types Z>Si present yes
0 ALERT level A = In general: serious problem 3 ALERT level B = Potentially serious problem 17 ALERT level C = Check and explain 1 ALERT level G = General alerts; check 1 ALERT type 1 CIF construction/syntax error, inconsistent or missing data 2 ALERT type 2 Indicator that the structure model may be wrong or deficient 1 ALERT type 3 Indicator that the structure quality may be low 17 ALERT type 4 Improvement, methodology, query or suggestion
Copyright © International Union of Crystallography
IUCr Webmaster