Download citation
Download citation
link to html
In the title compound, [CuCl(C19H11N4)], the CuI ion is coordinated by one Cl ion and two N atoms from a chelating 11-methyl­dipyrido[3,2-a:2′,3′-c]phenazine ligand. The CuI and Cl ions are situated on a mirror plane and the terminal methyl group of the ligand is disordered equally over two positions. Aromatic π–π stacking inter­actions [centroid separations = 3.609 (3)–3.669 (3) Å] help to stabilize the crystal packing.

Supporting information

cif

Crystallographic Information File (CIF) https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600536807036173/hb2482sup1.cif
Contains datablocks I, global

hkl

Structure factor file (CIF format) https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600536807036173/hb2482Isup2.hkl
Contains datablock I

CCDC reference: 657636

Key indicators

  • Single-crystal X-ray study
  • T = 293 K
  • Mean [sigma](C-C) = 0.008 Å
  • Disorder in main residue
  • R factor = 0.057
  • wR factor = 0.203
  • Data-to-parameter ratio = 13.3

checkCIF/PLATON results

No syntax errors found



Alert level B PLAT241_ALERT_2_B Check High Ueq as Compared to Neighbors for Cu1
Alert level C CRYSC01_ALERT_1_C The word below has not been recognised as a standard identifier. reddish PLAT066_ALERT_1_C Predicted and Reported Transmissions Identical . ? PLAT125_ALERT_4_C No _symmetry_space_group_name_Hall Given ....... ? PLAT241_ALERT_2_C Check High Ueq as Compared to Neighbors for C8 PLAT250_ALERT_2_C Large U3/U1 Ratio for Average U(i,j) Tensor .... 2.43 PLAT301_ALERT_3_C Main Residue Disorder ......................... 4.00 Perc. PLAT341_ALERT_3_C Low Bond Precision on C-C Bonds (x 1000) Ang ... 8 PLAT413_ALERT_2_C Short Inter XH3 .. XHn H3A .. H10C .. 2.13 Ang. PLAT432_ALERT_2_C Short Inter X...Y Contact C2 .. C10 .. 3.19 Ang.
Alert level G PLAT199_ALERT_1_G Check the Reported _cell_measurement_temperature 293 K PLAT200_ALERT_1_G Check the Reported _diffrn_ambient_temperature . 293 K
0 ALERT level A = In general: serious problem 1 ALERT level B = Potentially serious problem 9 ALERT level C = Check and explain 2 ALERT level G = General alerts; check 4 ALERT type 1 CIF construction/syntax error, inconsistent or missing data 5 ALERT type 2 Indicator that the structure model may be wrong or deficient 2 ALERT type 3 Indicator that the structure quality may be low 1 ALERT type 4 Improvement, methodology, query or suggestion 0 ALERT type 5 Informative message, check

Comment top

Recently, the construction of supramolecular architectures has attracted much attention for their intriguing structural features (Lu, 2003; Cheng et al., 2004). The 1,10-phenanthroline ligand has been widely used for the synthesis of coordination complexes; these are sometimes assembled into supramolecular architectures through aromatic π-π interactions (Chen & Liu, 2002). Dipyrido[3,2 - a:2',3'-c]phenazine is a similarly useful ligand, and several complexes have been reported (Li, Fang, Gao et al., 2006). To extend our recent work, we obtained the title compound, (I), by using 11-methyldipyrido[3,2 - a:2',3'-c]phenazine (MDPPz), 1,3-benzene dicarboxylic acid (which was not incorporated into the product) and CuCl2 as starting materials. The starting CuII was reduced to CuI by an unknown process.

In complex (I), the CuI ion is coordinated by two N atoms belonging to the bidentate MDPPz ligand and one Cl- ion, resulting in a CuN2Cl triangular geometry (Table 1, Fig. 1). The CuI and Cl- ions are situated on a mirror plane which also perpendicularly passes through the MSPPz ligand, thus the methyl group belonging to the MSPPz ligand is disordered and its occupancy is assigned as 0.5. There are π-π stacking interactions between the neighboring parallel MSDPPz liands, which the nearer centroid-to-centroid distance of aromatic rings is in the range 3.609 (3)—3.669 (3)Å (Fig. 2). These weak interactions consolidate the packing of (I).

Related literature top

For related structures, see: Li, Fang, Dong et al. (2006); Li, Fang, Gao et al. (2006). For background, see: Lu (2003); Cheng et al. (2004); Chen & Liu (2002). For the ligand synthesis, see: Steck & Day (1943).

Experimental top

The MDPPz ligand was synthesized by the literature method of Steck & Day (1943). A mixture of CuCl2 (0.3 mmol), MDPPz (0.3 mmol) and 1,3-benzene dicarboxylic acid (0.6 mmol) in distilled water (30 ml) was stirred thoroughly for 1 h at ambient temperature. The pH was adjusted to about 5 with aqueous NaOH solution. The suspension was then sealed in a Teflon-lined stainless steel reaction vessel (40 ml) and heated at 443 K for 4 d. The vessel was then cooled slowly to room temperature at a rate of 5 K /h before opening, and reddish brown crystals of (I) were collected.

Refinement top

The positional parameters of the H atoms were calculated geometrically (C—H = 0.93–0.96 Å) and refined as riding with Uiso = 1.2Ueq(C) or 1.5Ueq(methyl C).

Structure description top

Recently, the construction of supramolecular architectures has attracted much attention for their intriguing structural features (Lu, 2003; Cheng et al., 2004). The 1,10-phenanthroline ligand has been widely used for the synthesis of coordination complexes; these are sometimes assembled into supramolecular architectures through aromatic π-π interactions (Chen & Liu, 2002). Dipyrido[3,2 - a:2',3'-c]phenazine is a similarly useful ligand, and several complexes have been reported (Li, Fang, Gao et al., 2006). To extend our recent work, we obtained the title compound, (I), by using 11-methyldipyrido[3,2 - a:2',3'-c]phenazine (MDPPz), 1,3-benzene dicarboxylic acid (which was not incorporated into the product) and CuCl2 as starting materials. The starting CuII was reduced to CuI by an unknown process.

In complex (I), the CuI ion is coordinated by two N atoms belonging to the bidentate MDPPz ligand and one Cl- ion, resulting in a CuN2Cl triangular geometry (Table 1, Fig. 1). The CuI and Cl- ions are situated on a mirror plane which also perpendicularly passes through the MSPPz ligand, thus the methyl group belonging to the MSPPz ligand is disordered and its occupancy is assigned as 0.5. There are π-π stacking interactions between the neighboring parallel MSDPPz liands, which the nearer centroid-to-centroid distance of aromatic rings is in the range 3.609 (3)—3.669 (3)Å (Fig. 2). These weak interactions consolidate the packing of (I).

For related structures, see: Li, Fang, Dong et al. (2006); Li, Fang, Gao et al. (2006). For background, see: Lu (2003); Cheng et al. (2004); Chen & Liu (2002). For the ligand synthesis, see: Steck & Day (1943).

Computing details top

Data collection: APEX2 (Bruker, 2006); cell refinement: SAINT (Bruker, 2002); data reduction: SAINT; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 1997); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997); molecular graphics: DIAMOND (Brandenburg, 1999); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXL97.

Figures top
[Figure 1] Fig. 1. The molecular structure of (I). Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at 30% probability level (H atoms are omitted for clarity) [Symmetry code: i) x, 1/2 - y, z.].
[Figure 2] Fig. 2. The packing diagram of (I) (H atoms were omitted for clarity; the centroid-to-centroid distances are shown as dashed line.).
Chlorido(11-methyldipyrido[3,2 - a:2',3'-c]phenazine-κ2N4,N5)copper(I) top
Crystal data top
[CuCl(C19H11N4)]Dx = 1.678 Mg m3
Mr = 394.31Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Orthorhombic, PnmaCell parameters from 2310 reflections
a = 25.947 (4) Åθ = 2.1–25.3°
b = 12.1604 (17) ŵ = 1.58 mm1
c = 4.9456 (7) ÅT = 293 K
V = 1560.5 (4) Å3Block, reddish brown
Z = 40.49 × 0.11 × 0.05 mm
F(000) = 796
Data collection top
Bruker SMART APEXII CCD area-detector
diffractometer
1615 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube822 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromatorRint = 0.066
ω scansθmax = 26.1°, θmin = 2.3°
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(SADABS; Bruker, 2002)
h = 1632
Tmin = 0.812, Tmax = 0.924k = 1415
7882 measured reflectionsl = 56
Refinement top
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.057Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.203H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.02 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.1074P)2]
where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
1615 reflections(Δ/σ)max = 0.001
121 parametersΔρmax = 0.50 e Å3
0 restraintsΔρmin = 0.45 e Å3
Crystal data top
[CuCl(C19H11N4)]V = 1560.5 (4) Å3
Mr = 394.31Z = 4
Orthorhombic, PnmaMo Kα radiation
a = 25.947 (4) ŵ = 1.58 mm1
b = 12.1604 (17) ÅT = 293 K
c = 4.9456 (7) Å0.49 × 0.11 × 0.05 mm
Data collection top
Bruker SMART APEXII CCD area-detector
diffractometer
1615 independent reflections
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(SADABS; Bruker, 2002)
822 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Tmin = 0.812, Tmax = 0.924Rint = 0.066
7882 measured reflections
Refinement top
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.0570 restraints
wR(F2) = 0.203H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.02Δρmax = 0.50 e Å3
1615 reflectionsΔρmin = 0.45 e Å3
121 parameters
Special details top

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.

Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/UeqOcc. (<1)
Cu10.98473 (4)0.25000.1790 (2)0.1045 (6)
Cl11.04420 (8)0.25000.1105 (4)0.0798 (7)
N20.81629 (16)0.1340 (4)1.1113 (8)0.0742 (13)
N10.94108 (15)0.1397 (4)0.3947 (8)0.0660 (12)
C50.84651 (18)0.1914 (4)0.9473 (9)0.0625 (13)
C80.7193 (2)0.1927 (7)1.6198 (11)0.124 (4)
C40.87997 (17)0.1316 (5)0.7633 (10)0.0606 (13)
C90.91021 (18)0.1903 (4)0.5804 (9)0.0596 (13)
C10.9417 (2)0.0309 (6)0.3921 (12)0.0786 (16)
H1A0.96170.00410.26210.094*
C20.9142 (2)0.0339 (5)0.5726 (13)0.0851 (17)
H2A0.91680.11020.56770.102*
C30.8830 (2)0.0173 (5)0.7586 (13)0.0772 (16)
H3A0.86410.02420.88110.093*
C70.7512 (2)0.1350 (7)1.4547 (12)0.103 (2)
H7A0.75050.05851.45680.124*
C60.7858 (2)0.1912 (5)1.2780 (10)0.0812 (19)
C100.6809 (4)0.1629 (11)1.814 (2)0.089 (4)0.50
H10A0.66690.22821.89440.133*0.50
H10B0.69620.11791.95180.133*0.50
H10C0.65390.12261.72590.133*0.50
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top
U11U22U33U12U13U23
Cu10.0553 (7)0.1961 (15)0.0621 (8)0.0000.0113 (5)0.000
Cl10.0772 (14)0.0847 (14)0.0774 (12)0.0000.0374 (10)0.000
N20.046 (3)0.126 (4)0.051 (2)0.010 (2)0.002 (2)0.012 (2)
N10.050 (3)0.096 (4)0.052 (2)0.009 (2)0.0027 (19)0.009 (2)
C50.044 (3)0.100 (4)0.043 (2)0.005 (2)0.008 (2)0.004 (2)
C80.047 (3)0.274 (12)0.051 (3)0.013 (4)0.002 (3)0.019 (4)
C40.041 (3)0.087 (4)0.053 (3)0.004 (3)0.002 (2)0.002 (3)
C90.045 (3)0.086 (3)0.047 (3)0.001 (2)0.008 (2)0.002 (2)
C10.059 (4)0.101 (5)0.076 (4)0.015 (3)0.005 (3)0.020 (4)
C20.075 (4)0.096 (4)0.085 (4)0.004 (3)0.002 (3)0.004 (4)
C30.070 (4)0.091 (4)0.070 (3)0.003 (3)0.001 (3)0.011 (3)
C70.054 (4)0.192 (7)0.063 (4)0.016 (4)0.000 (3)0.025 (4)
C60.043 (3)0.157 (6)0.043 (3)0.007 (3)0.000 (2)0.008 (3)
C100.061 (7)0.133 (10)0.072 (8)0.022 (7)0.011 (6)0.008 (7)
Geometric parameters (Å, º) top
Cu1—N1i2.054 (5)C4—C91.394 (6)
Cu1—N12.054 (5)C9—C9i1.453 (10)
Cu1—Cl12.105 (2)C1—C21.389 (8)
N2—C51.326 (6)C1—H1A0.9300
N2—C61.337 (7)C2—C31.374 (8)
N1—C11.323 (7)C2—H2A0.9300
N1—C91.365 (6)C3—H3A0.9300
C5—C5i1.425 (10)C7—C61.428 (8)
C5—C41.453 (7)C7—H7A0.9300
C8—C71.358 (9)C6—C6i1.429 (12)
C8—C8i1.395 (17)C10—H10A0.9600
C8—C101.430 (11)C10—H10B0.9600
C4—C31.392 (7)C10—H10C0.9600
N1i—Cu1—N181.5 (3)N1—C1—H1A118.1
N1i—Cu1—Cl1139.24 (13)C2—C1—H1A118.1
N1—Cu1—Cl1139.24 (13)C3—C2—C1118.4 (6)
C5—N2—C6116.9 (5)C3—C2—H2A120.8
C1—N1—C9117.6 (5)C1—C2—H2A120.8
C1—N1—Cu1129.9 (4)C2—C3—C4119.8 (6)
C9—N1—Cu1112.3 (4)C2—C3—H3A120.1
N2—C5—C5i121.7 (3)C4—C3—H3A120.1
N2—C5—C4118.2 (5)C8—C7—C6120.3 (8)
C5i—C5—C4120.0 (3)C8—C7—H7A119.9
C7—C8—C8i121.1 (5)C6—C7—H7A119.9
C7—C8—C10134.3 (9)N2—C6—C7120.0 (6)
C8i—C8—C10104.6 (6)N2—C6—C6i121.3 (3)
C3—C4—C9117.9 (5)C7—C6—C6i118.6 (4)
C3—C4—C5123.0 (5)C8—C10—H10A109.5
C9—C4—C5119.1 (5)C8—C10—H10B109.5
N1—C9—C4122.4 (5)H10A—C10—H10B109.5
N1—C9—C9i116.8 (3)C8—C10—H10C109.5
C4—C9—C9i120.8 (3)H10A—C10—H10C109.5
N1—C1—C2123.7 (6)H10B—C10—H10C109.5
Symmetry code: (i) x, y+1/2, z.

Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formula[CuCl(C19H11N4)]
Mr394.31
Crystal system, space groupOrthorhombic, Pnma
Temperature (K)293
a, b, c (Å)25.947 (4), 12.1604 (17), 4.9456 (7)
V3)1560.5 (4)
Z4
Radiation typeMo Kα
µ (mm1)1.58
Crystal size (mm)0.49 × 0.11 × 0.05
Data collection
DiffractometerBruker SMART APEXII CCD area-detector
Absorption correctionMulti-scan
(SADABS; Bruker, 2002)
Tmin, Tmax0.812, 0.924
No. of measured, independent and
observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections
7882, 1615, 822
Rint0.066
(sin θ/λ)max1)0.618
Refinement
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S 0.057, 0.203, 1.02
No. of reflections1615
No. of parameters121
H-atom treatmentH-atom parameters constrained
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å3)0.50, 0.45

Computer programs: APEX2 (Bruker, 2006), SAINT (Bruker, 2002), SAINT, SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 1997), SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997), DIAMOND (Brandenburg, 1999), SHELXL97.

Selected geometric parameters (Å, º) top
Cu1—N12.054 (5)Cu1—Cl12.105 (2)
N1i—Cu1—N181.5 (3)N1—Cu1—Cl1139.24 (13)
Symmetry code: (i) x, y+1/2, z.
 

Follow Acta Cryst. E
Sign up for e-alerts
Follow Acta Cryst. on Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds