organic compounds\(\def\hfill{\hskip 5em}\def\hfil{\hskip 3em}\def\eqno#1{\hfil {#1}}\)

Journal logoCRYSTALLOGRAPHIC
COMMUNICATIONS
ISSN: 2056-9890

7-Bromo-4b-methyl-7,8-di­hydro-4bH-9-thia-8a-aza­fluorene 9,9-dioxide

aEvans Chemical Laboratories, Ohio State University, 100 West 18th Avenue, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
*Correspondence e-mail: gallucci.1@osu.edu

(Received 13 March 2008; accepted 12 June 2008; online 19 June 2008)

The title compound, C12H12BrNO2S, was isolated after direct irradiation (hν 350 nm, hexa­ne) of a mixture of stereoisomeric sulfonamides containing a vicinal dibromide and a conjugated diene. This product is one of a group of substrates that has contributed to our understanding of the photoreactivity patterns of non-bridged sulfonamides. The crystal structure was determined from a non-merohedrally twinned data set, where the twin law corresponded to a 180° rotation about the a* axis. The minor twin component refined to a value of 0.176 (3). The conformation of the mol­ecule is planar at one end, as the benzene ring and the adjacent fused five-membered ring are coplanar, and U-shaped at the other end, where the five-membered ring is fused to the heterocyclic six-membered ring containing an allyl bromide group.

Related literature

For related chemistry, see: Dura & Paquette (2006[Dura, R. D. & Paquette, L. A. (2006). J. Org. Chem. 71, 2456-2459.]); Paquette et al. (2004[Paquette, L. A., Barton, W. R. S. & Gallucci, J. C. (2004). Org. Lett. 6, 1313-1315.], 2006[Paquette, L. A., Dura, R. D., Fosnaugh, N. & Stepanian, M. (2006). J. Org. Chem. 71, 8438-8445.]). For related literature, see: Cooper et al. (2002[Cooper, R. I., Gould, R. O., Parsons, S. & Watkin, D. J. (2002). J. Appl. Cryst. 35, 168-174.]).

[Scheme 1]

Experimental

Crystal data
  • C12H12BrNO2S

  • Mr = 314.2

  • Monoclinic, P 21 /c

  • a = 14.3970 (3) Å

  • b = 7.8912 (1) Å

  • c = 11.4652 (2) Å

  • β = 103.009 (1)°

  • V = 1269.13 (4) Å3

  • Z = 4

  • Mo Kα radiation

  • μ = 3.39 mm−1

  • T = 293 (2) K

  • 0.38 × 0.27 × 0.04 mm

Data collection
  • Nonius KappaCCD diffractometer

  • Absorption correction: multi-scan (SCALEPACK; Otwinowski & Minor, 1997[Otwinowski, Z. & Minor, W. (1997). Methods in Enzymology, Vol. 276, Macromolecular Crystallography, Part A, edited by C. W. Carter Jr & R. M. Sweet, pp. 307-326. New York: Academic Press.]) Tmin = 0.650, Tmax = 0.873

  • 18122 measured reflections

  • 2835 independent reflections

  • 2401 reflections with I > 2σ(I)

  • Rint = 0.055

Refinement
  • R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.044

  • wR(F2) = 0.115

  • S = 1.49

  • 1509 reflections

  • 156 parameters

  • H-atom parameters constrained

  • Δρmax = 0.62 e Å−3

  • Δρmin = −0.29 e Å−3

Data collection: COLLECT (Nonius, 2000[Nonius (2000). COLLECT. Nonius BV, Delft, The Netherlands.]); cell refinement: SCALEPACK (Otwinowski & Minor, 1997[Otwinowski, Z. & Minor, W. (1997). Methods in Enzymology, Vol. 276, Macromolecular Crystallography, Part A, edited by C. W. Carter Jr & R. M. Sweet, pp. 307-326. New York: Academic Press.]); data reduction: DENZO (Otwinowski & Minor, 1997[Otwinowski, Z. & Minor, W. (1997). Methods in Enzymology, Vol. 276, Macromolecular Crystallography, Part A, edited by C. W. Carter Jr & R. M. Sweet, pp. 307-326. New York: Academic Press.]) and SCALEPACK; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008[Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112-122.]); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008[Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112-122.]); molecular graphics: ORTEP-3 for Windows (Farrugia, 1997[Farrugia, L. J. (1997). J. Appl. Cryst. 30, 565.]); software used to prepare material for publication: WinGX (Farrugia, 1999[Farrugia, L. J. (1999). J. Appl. Cryst. 32, 837-838.]).

Supporting information


Comment top

The crystal structure of compound (I), C12H12BrNO2S, was determined as part of a study of the photoreactivity of non-bridged sulfonamides and is shown in Fig. 1.

The photo-induced direct or triplet-sensitized irradiation of sulfonamides (II), (III), (IV) and (V) have established that the proximity of a sulfonamide functionality to a conjugated diene unit can have one of several chemical consequences (Paquette et al., 2004, 2006; Dura & Paquette, 2006) as shown in Fig. 2. Whereas previous studies have focused on bicyclic frameworks with the sulfonamide nitrogen occupying a bridgehead position, e.g. (II), (III) and (IV), the fourth compound in this series, (V), was designed to be considerably more planar in nature for the purpose of probing the relationship between photoreactivity and nitrogen geometry. The title compound is the product of a study currently underway to assess the consequences of the more planar nature of these heterocyclic sulfonamides containing a diene unit.

Compound (I) was produced photochemically from a mixture of compounds (XII) and (XIII) as shown in Fig. 3. Unlike the previous sulfonamides depicted in Fig. 2, (XIII) has proven to be resistant per se to inter- or intramolecular photochemical transformations. However, an equimolar mixture of the vicinal dibromide (XII) and the diene (XIII) has been observed to yield the title compound (I). The mechanism of this transformation is currently under investigation.

One end of molecule (I) is planar, as the benzene ring and adjacent five-membered ring, consisting of atoms S9, N8a, C4b, C4a and C9a, are essentially coplanar. The other end of the molecule can be described as U-shaped when considering the same five-membered ring combined with the heterocyclic six-membered ring containing the allyl bromide. The conformation of this heterocyclic ring is such that atoms N8a, C4b, C5, C6 and C7 are approximately coplanar, with atom C8 lying 0.620 (5) Å out of this plane. The nitrogen atom is pyramidal and its lone pair of electrons is on the same side of the molecule as the methyl group. The methyl and Br groups are oriented cis with respect to each other.

This structure was determined from a non-merohedrally twinned data set. The twin law corresponded to a 180° rotation about the a* axis, and was obtained with the aid of the Rotax program (Cooper et al., 2002). Application of this twin law to the data to create an HKLF 5 format data set (Sheldrick, 2008) was done with the WinGX software (Farrugia, 1999). The minor twin component refined to a value of 0.176 (3).

Related literature top

For related chemistry, see: Dura & Paquette (2006); Paquette et al. (2004, 2006). For related literature, see: Cooper et al. (2002).

Experimental top

A mixture of the vicinal dibromide (XII) (8.4 mg, 0.021 mmol) and diene (XIII) (5.0 mg, 0.021 mmol) was dissolved in hexane/dichloromethane (3:2), deoxygenated with Ar for 1 h, and placed in a quartz reaction vessel. That mixture was then irradiated with a bank of 3500 Å lamps for 1.5 h, concentrated, and purified by means of preparative basic alumina plate chromatography (elution with dichloromethane) to provide 1.1 mg of the title compound (I) (17%). Colorless crystals of (I) were grown from chloroform and have a melting point of 148–150°C.

Refinement top

During the final stages of the refinement before application of the twin law, the R factors were slightly large, with R1 = 0.075 for I>2σ(I), the largest peak in the difference electron density map was 0.92 e/Å3, and the errors in the metrical parameters were large, with a C—C bond length error typically around 0.01 Å. Since the precession images assembled from the data frames indicated that twinning was a possibility, Rotax (Cooper et al., 2002) was used to generate various twin laws. The twin law corresponding to a 180° rotation about the a* axis was applied to the data set, since it agreed with the appearance of the precession images. This twin law in matrix form is as follows: [1 0 0.565 / 0 -1 0 / 0 0 -1]. Application of this twin law to the data to create an HKLF 5 format data set (Sheldrick, 2008) was done with the WinGX software (Farrugia, 1999). Since this is a non-merohedral twin, it was necessary to generate and test several data sets based on different overlap criteria for the reflections. The set of overlap criteria which minimized the R factors was chosen as the best set.

The final results are based on this modified data set, which contains composite reflections (reflections exactly overlapped due to twinning) and single reflections. Still other reflections are omitted from the data set because they are partially overlapped with their twin component reflections and could not be integrated with the data integration software. As a result, the completeness of the data set is low at 67.7%. The minor twin component refined to a value of 0.176 (3). Application of this twin law to the data set has resulted in an overall improvement in the model with a decrease in the R values, a decrease in the largest peak in the final difference map and a decrease in the errors in the metrical parameters.

Computing details top

Data collection: COLLECT (Nonius, 2000); cell refinement: SCALEPACK (Otwinowski & Minor, 1997); data reduction: DENZO (Otwinowski & Minor, 1997) and SCALEPACK (Otwinowski & Minor, 1997); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: ORTEP-3 for Windows (Farrugia, 1997); software used to prepare material for publication: WinGX (Farrugia, 1999).

Figures top
[Figure 1] Fig. 1. The molecular structure of (I) is drawn with 50% probability displacement ellipsoids for non-hydrogen atoms. The hydrogen atoms are drawn with an artificial radius.
[Figure 2] Fig. 2. Photochemical reactions for sulfonamides (II—V).
[Figure 3] Fig. 3. Photosynthesis of (I) from (XII) and (XIII).
7-Bromo-4b-methyl-7,8-dihydro-4bH-9-thia-8a-azafluorene 9,9-dioxide top
Crystal data top
C12H12BrNO2SF(000) = 632
Mr = 314.2Dx = 1.644 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/cMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -P 2ybcCell parameters from 2393 reflections
a = 14.3970 (3) Åθ = 2.0–25.0°
b = 7.8912 (1) ŵ = 3.39 mm1
c = 11.4652 (2) ÅT = 293 K
β = 103.009 (1)°Plate, colorless
V = 1269.13 (4) Å30.38 × 0.27 × 0.04 mm
Z = 4
Data collection top
Nonius KappaCCD
diffractometer
2835 independent reflections
Radiation source: Enraf–Nonius FR5902401 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromatorRint = 0.055
Detector resolution: 9 pixels mm-1θmax = 25.0°, θmin = 2.9°
ϕ and ω scansh = 1716
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(SCALEPACK; Otwinowski & Minor, 1997)
k = 99
Tmin = 0.650, Tmax = 0.873l = 1313
18122 measured reflections
Refinement top
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.044Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.115H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.49 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0519P)2 + 1.4699P]
where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
1509 reflections(Δ/σ)max = 0.001
156 parametersΔρmax = 0.62 e Å3
0 restraintsΔρmin = 0.29 e Å3
Crystal data top
C12H12BrNO2SV = 1269.13 (4) Å3
Mr = 314.2Z = 4
Monoclinic, P21/cMo Kα radiation
a = 14.3970 (3) ŵ = 3.39 mm1
b = 7.8912 (1) ÅT = 293 K
c = 11.4652 (2) Å0.38 × 0.27 × 0.04 mm
β = 103.009 (1)°
Data collection top
Nonius KappaCCD
diffractometer
2835 independent reflections
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(SCALEPACK; Otwinowski & Minor, 1997)
2401 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Tmin = 0.650, Tmax = 0.873Rint = 0.055
18122 measured reflections
Refinement top
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.0440 restraints
wR(F2) = 0.115H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.49Δρmax = 0.62 e Å3
1509 reflectionsΔρmin = 0.29 e Å3
156 parameters
Special details top

Experimental. Examination of the diffraction pattern on a Nonius Kappa CCD diffractometer indicated a monoclinic crystal system. All work was done at room temperature. The data collection strategy was set up to measure a quadrant of reciprocal space with a redundancy factor of 3.7, which means that 90% of the reflections were measured at least 3.7 times. Phi and omega scans with a frame width of 1.0 degree were used for data collection. Data integration was done with DENZO (Otwinowski & Minor, 1997) and scaling and merging of the data was done with SCALEPACK (Otwinowski & Minor, 1997).

Structure solution was done by a combination of the Patterson method and the direct methods procedure in SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008). Full-matrix least-squares refinements based on F2 were performed in SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008), as incorporated in the WinGX package (Farrugia, 1999).

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.

Refinement. For the methyl group, the hydrogen atoms were added at calculated positions using a riding model with C—H=0.96 Å and U(H)=1.5*Ueq(bonded carbon atom). The torsion angle, which defines the orientation of the methyl group about the C—C bond, was refined. The remaining hydrogen atoms were included in the model at calculated positions using a riding model with a range of C—H distances from 0.93 to 0.98 Å and U(H)=1.2*Ueq(bonded carbon atom).

Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/Ueq
C10.5240 (3)0.5539 (6)0.6801 (5)0.0531 (12)
H10.50270.47920.73120.064*
C20.4619 (4)0.6615 (7)0.6053 (6)0.0591 (14)
H20.39730.65900.60520.071*
C30.4949 (4)0.7726 (6)0.5310 (5)0.0605 (14)
H30.45180.84300.48060.073*
C40.5905 (4)0.7819 (6)0.5296 (5)0.0528 (12)
H40.61200.85970.48070.063*
C4A0.6539 (3)0.6727 (5)0.6026 (4)0.0419 (11)
C4B0.7600 (3)0.6587 (6)0.6089 (4)0.0431 (11)
C50.7758 (3)0.5980 (6)0.4897 (4)0.0465 (11)
H50.75460.66730.42340.056*
C60.8171 (3)0.4552 (6)0.4730 (5)0.0522 (12)
H60.82190.42700.39580.063*
C70.8568 (3)0.3362 (6)0.5723 (5)0.0509 (12)
H70.81030.24610.57400.061*
C80.8773 (3)0.4279 (6)0.6908 (5)0.0494 (12)
H8A0.89250.34610.75540.059*
H8B0.93210.50130.69600.059*
N8A0.7945 (3)0.5296 (5)0.7036 (3)0.0438 (9)
C9A0.6193 (3)0.5621 (5)0.6755 (4)0.0445 (11)
C100.8122 (4)0.8269 (6)0.6448 (5)0.0585 (14)
H10A0.79570.87000.71580.088*
H10B0.79390.90740.58100.088*
H10C0.87980.80850.66010.088*
O10.6992 (3)0.2591 (4)0.7125 (3)0.0559 (9)
O20.7235 (3)0.4530 (5)0.8805 (3)0.0643 (10)
S90.70986 (9)0.43152 (14)0.75307 (11)0.0450 (3)
Br0.97557 (5)0.23461 (9)0.54940 (6)0.0811 (3)
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top
U11U22U33U12U13U23
C10.055 (3)0.050 (3)0.061 (3)0.002 (2)0.027 (3)0.008 (2)
C20.048 (3)0.053 (3)0.080 (4)0.004 (2)0.023 (3)0.015 (3)
C30.062 (4)0.049 (3)0.069 (3)0.017 (2)0.010 (3)0.008 (3)
C40.065 (4)0.040 (2)0.055 (3)0.006 (2)0.017 (2)0.002 (2)
C4A0.054 (3)0.034 (2)0.041 (3)0.000 (2)0.017 (2)0.0063 (19)
C4B0.052 (3)0.039 (2)0.040 (3)0.001 (2)0.016 (2)0.001 (2)
C50.052 (3)0.052 (3)0.039 (3)0.000 (2)0.016 (2)0.004 (2)
C60.054 (3)0.060 (3)0.045 (3)0.003 (2)0.015 (2)0.008 (2)
C70.050 (3)0.046 (3)0.062 (3)0.001 (2)0.024 (2)0.001 (2)
C80.042 (3)0.053 (3)0.052 (3)0.001 (2)0.008 (2)0.007 (2)
N8A0.047 (2)0.045 (2)0.041 (2)0.0008 (17)0.0129 (18)0.0024 (17)
C9A0.051 (3)0.041 (2)0.044 (3)0.001 (2)0.017 (2)0.004 (2)
C100.069 (4)0.043 (3)0.063 (4)0.012 (3)0.014 (3)0.004 (2)
O10.063 (2)0.0424 (19)0.066 (2)0.0003 (15)0.0238 (16)0.0028 (18)
O20.079 (3)0.080 (3)0.038 (2)0.003 (2)0.0223 (18)0.0037 (17)
S90.0546 (7)0.0438 (6)0.0403 (7)0.0009 (5)0.0187 (5)0.0036 (5)
Br0.0675 (5)0.0895 (5)0.0925 (5)0.0267 (3)0.0314 (3)0.0027 (4)
Geometric parameters (Å, º) top
C1—C21.382 (8)C6—C71.487 (7)
C1—C9A1.387 (7)C6—H60.9300
C1—H10.9300C7—C81.508 (7)
C2—C31.380 (8)C7—Br1.959 (5)
C2—H20.9300C7—H70.9800
C3—C41.382 (8)C8—N8A1.472 (6)
C3—H30.9300C8—H8A0.9700
C4—C4A1.390 (7)C8—H8B0.9700
C4—H40.9300N8A—S91.648 (4)
C4A—C9A1.377 (6)C9A—S91.741 (5)
C4A—C4B1.517 (6)C10—H10A0.9600
C4B—N8A1.490 (6)C10—H10B0.9600
C4B—C51.513 (7)C10—H10C0.9600
C4B—C101.535 (7)O1—S91.435 (3)
C5—C61.308 (7)O2—S91.440 (4)
C5—H50.9300
C2—C1—C9A117.1 (5)C8—C7—Br108.5 (3)
C2—C1—H1121.5C6—C7—H7109.1
C9A—C1—H1121.5C8—C7—H7109.1
C3—C2—C1120.6 (5)Br—C7—H7109.1
C3—C2—H2119.7N8A—C8—C7110.7 (4)
C1—C2—H2119.7N8A—C8—H8A109.5
C2—C3—C4121.5 (5)C7—C8—H8A109.5
C2—C3—H3119.2N8A—C8—H8B109.5
C4—C3—H3119.2C7—C8—H8B109.5
C3—C4—C4A118.8 (5)H8A—C8—H8B108.1
C3—C4—H4120.6C8—N8A—C4B116.4 (4)
C4A—C4—H4120.6C8—N8A—S9117.2 (3)
C9A—C4A—C4118.7 (5)C4B—N8A—S9114.9 (3)
C9A—C4A—C4B115.0 (4)C4A—C9A—C1123.3 (5)
C4—C4A—C4B126.3 (4)C4A—C9A—S9110.7 (4)
N8A—C4B—C5110.4 (4)C1—C9A—S9125.9 (4)
N8A—C4B—C4A104.5 (4)C4B—C10—H10A109.5
C5—C4B—C4A109.6 (4)C4B—C10—H10B109.5
N8A—C4B—C10109.4 (4)H10A—C10—H10B109.5
C5—C4B—C10110.6 (4)C4B—C10—H10C109.5
C4A—C4B—C10112.1 (4)H10A—C10—H10C109.5
C6—C5—C4B124.8 (5)H10B—C10—H10C109.5
C6—C5—H5117.6O1—S9—O2114.9 (2)
C4B—C5—H5117.6O1—S9—N8A111.5 (2)
C5—C6—C7122.7 (5)O2—S9—N8A110.6 (2)
C5—C6—H6118.6O1—S9—C9A112.5 (2)
C7—C6—H6118.6O2—S9—C9A111.4 (2)
C6—C7—C8110.5 (4)N8A—S9—C9A94.2 (2)
C6—C7—Br110.6 (3)
C9A—C1—C2—C30.7 (8)C10—C4B—N8A—C889.4 (5)
C1—C2—C3—C40.8 (8)C5—C4B—N8A—S9109.8 (4)
C2—C3—C4—C4A1.9 (7)C4A—C4B—N8A—S97.9 (4)
C3—C4—C4A—C9A1.4 (7)C10—C4B—N8A—S9128.2 (4)
C3—C4—C4A—C4B177.0 (4)C4—C4A—C9A—C10.1 (7)
C9A—C4A—C4B—N8A3.8 (5)C4B—C4A—C9A—C1178.7 (4)
C4—C4A—C4B—N8A177.8 (4)C4—C4A—C9A—S9177.2 (3)
C9A—C4A—C4B—C5114.5 (4)C4B—C4A—C9A—S91.4 (5)
C4—C4A—C4B—C563.9 (6)C2—C1—C9A—C4A1.2 (7)
C9A—C4A—C4B—C10122.3 (5)C2—C1—C9A—S9175.7 (4)
C4—C4A—C4B—C1059.3 (6)C8—N8A—S9—O133.8 (4)
N8A—C4B—C5—C62.3 (7)C4B—N8A—S9—O1108.2 (3)
C4A—C4B—C5—C6117.0 (5)C8—N8A—S9—O295.3 (4)
C10—C4B—C5—C6118.9 (5)C4B—N8A—S9—O2122.7 (3)
C4B—C5—C6—C72.0 (8)C8—N8A—S9—C9A150.0 (3)
C5—C6—C7—C821.9 (7)C4B—N8A—S9—C9A8.0 (3)
C5—C6—C7—Br142.1 (4)C4A—C9A—S9—O1110.0 (3)
C6—C7—C8—N8A49.3 (5)C1—C9A—S9—O167.2 (5)
Br—C7—C8—N8A170.7 (3)C4A—C9A—S9—O2119.3 (4)
C7—C8—N8A—C4B57.5 (5)C1—C9A—S9—O263.5 (5)
C7—C8—N8A—S984.0 (4)C4A—C9A—S9—N8A5.3 (4)
C5—C4B—N8A—C832.5 (5)C1—C9A—S9—N8A177.5 (4)
C4A—C4B—N8A—C8150.3 (4)

Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formulaC12H12BrNO2S
Mr314.2
Crystal system, space groupMonoclinic, P21/c
Temperature (K)293
a, b, c (Å)14.3970 (3), 7.8912 (1), 11.4652 (2)
β (°) 103.009 (1)
V3)1269.13 (4)
Z4
Radiation typeMo Kα
µ (mm1)3.39
Crystal size (mm)0.38 × 0.27 × 0.04
Data collection
DiffractometerNonius KappaCCD
diffractometer
Absorption correctionMulti-scan
(SCALEPACK; Otwinowski & Minor, 1997)
Tmin, Tmax0.650, 0.873
No. of measured, independent and
observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections
18122, 2835, 2401
Rint0.055
(sin θ/λ)max1)0.594
Refinement
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S 0.044, 0.115, 1.49
No. of reflections1509
No. of parameters156
H-atom treatmentH-atom parameters constrained
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å3)0.62, 0.29

Computer programs: COLLECT (Nonius, 2000), SCALEPACK (Otwinowski & Minor, 1997), DENZO (Otwinowski & Minor, 1997) and SCALEPACK (Otwinowski & Minor, 1997), SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008), SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008), ORTEP-3 for Windows (Farrugia, 1997), WinGX (Farrugia, 1999).

 

References

First citationCooper, R. I., Gould, R. O., Parsons, S. & Watkin, D. J. (2002). J. Appl. Cryst. 35, 168–174.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationDura, R. D. & Paquette, L. A. (2006). J. Org. Chem. 71, 2456–2459.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
First citationFarrugia, L. J. (1997). J. Appl. Cryst. 30, 565.  CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationFarrugia, L. J. (1999). J. Appl. Cryst. 32, 837–838.  CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationNonius (2000). COLLECT. Nonius BV, Delft, The Netherlands.  Google Scholar
First citationOtwinowski, Z. & Minor, W. (1997). Methods in Enzymology, Vol. 276, Macromolecular Crystallography, Part A, edited by C. W. Carter Jr & R. M. Sweet, pp. 307–326. New York: Academic Press.  Google Scholar
First citationPaquette, L. A., Barton, W. R. S. & Gallucci, J. C. (2004). Org. Lett. 6, 1313–1315.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
First citationPaquette, L. A., Dura, R. D., Fosnaugh, N. & Stepanian, M. (2006). J. Org. Chem. 71, 8438–8445.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
First citationSheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.

Journal logoCRYSTALLOGRAPHIC
COMMUNICATIONS
ISSN: 2056-9890
Follow Acta Cryst. E
Sign up for e-alerts
Follow Acta Cryst. on Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds