supplementary materials


Acta Cryst. (2009). E65, o952    [ doi:10.1107/S1600536809011647 ]

3,3',5,5'-Tetrabromo-2,2'-bithiophene

H. Li and L. Li

Abstract top

The title compound, C8H2Br4S2, was prepared by bromination of 2,2'-bithiophene with bromine. The molecule is located on a crystallographic twofold rotation axis, thereby imposing equal geometry of the two thiophene rings. Each five-membered ring is planar [maximum deviation 0.011 (9) Å] and the dihedral angle between the planes through the rings is 47.2 (4)°. The molecules are arranged to minimize intramolecular contacts between the 3-3' and 5-5'-bromine atoms.

Comment top

3,3',5,5'-Tetrabromo-2,2'-bithiophene is an important intermediate compound in the synthesis of oligothiophenes and polythiophenes which have recently attracted attention as materials showing conductive, semiconductive, nonlinear optical (NLO), and liquid crystalline characteristics (Roncali, 1997; Funahashi et al., 2005). While synthesis of 3,3',5,5'-tetrabromo-2,2'-bithiophene could be achieved by coupling of 2,3-dibromothiophene (Takahashi et al., 2006) or bromination of 2,2'-bithiophene (Lin et al., 2005), its single crystal structure has not been reported. Herein we present the single crystal structure of the title compound. A molecule of the title compound is located on a crystallographic two-fold rotation axis, thereby imposing equal geometry of the two rings. Each 5-membered ring is planar and the dihedral angle between the planes thorugh the rings is 47.2 (4)°. The molecules arrange in such a fashion that both pairs of bromine atoms (3- and 3'-bromine and 5- and 5'-bromine) lie far away to each other.

Related literature top

For general background, see: Roncali (1997); Funahashi et al. (2005). For synthetic methods, see: Takahashi et al. (2006); Lin et al. (2005).

Experimental top

The title compound was prepared as reported in the literature (Lin et al., 2005). Single crystals suitable for X-ray diffraction measurement were obtained by slow evaporation of a solution in ethanol (m.p. 413 K; literature value: 413–414 K (Takahashi et al., 2006)).

Refinement top

All H atoms were placed at calculated positions and refined using a riding model approximation, with C—H = 0.93 Å and with Uiso(H) = 1.2Ueq(C).

Computing details top

Data collection: SMART (Bruker, 2001); cell refinement: SAINT (Bruker, 2001); data reduction: SAINT (Bruker, 2001); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008).

Figures top
[Figure 1] Fig. 1. A view of the molecule of the title compound. Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 30% probability level.
3,3',5,5'-Tetrabromo-2,2'-bithiophene top
Crystal data top
C8H2Br4S2Dx = 2.756 Mg m3
Mr = 481.86Melting point = 413–414 K
Monoclinic, C2/cMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
a = 17.164 (3) ÅCell parameters from 1249 reflections
b = 4.0153 (7) Åθ = 4.8–55.3°
c = 18.655 (3) ŵ = 14.18 mm1
β = 115.395 (3)°T = 293 K
V = 1161.4 (4) Å3Prismatic, yellow
Z = 40.40 × 0.17 × 0.05 mm
F(000) = 888
Data collection top
Bruker SMART CCD area-detector
diffractometer
1077 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube886 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
graphiteRint = 0.146
φ and ω scansθmax = 25.5°, θmin = 2.4°
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(SADABS; Sheldrick, 2004)
h = 2018
Tmin = 0.258, Tmax = 1.000k = 44
2792 measured reflectionsl = 2221
Refinement top
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.078Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.208H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.00 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.1428P)2]
where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
1077 reflections(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
64 parametersΔρmax = 1.15 e Å3
0 restraintsΔρmin = 1.06 e Å3
Crystal data top
C8H2Br4S2V = 1161.4 (4) Å3
Mr = 481.86Z = 4
Monoclinic, C2/cMo Kα radiation
a = 17.164 (3) ŵ = 14.18 mm1
b = 4.0153 (7) ÅT = 293 K
c = 18.655 (3) Å0.40 × 0.17 × 0.05 mm
β = 115.395 (3)°
Data collection top
Bruker SMART CCD area-detector
diffractometer
1077 independent reflections
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(SADABS; Sheldrick, 2004)
886 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Tmin = 0.258, Tmax = 1.000Rint = 0.146
2792 measured reflectionsθmax = 25.5°
Refinement top
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.078H-atom parameters constrained
wR(F2) = 0.208Δρmax = 1.15 e Å3
S = 1.00Δρmin = 1.06 e Å3
1077 reflectionsAbsolute structure: ?
64 parametersFlack parameter: ?
0 restraintsRogers parameter: ?
Special details top

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.

Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/Ueq
Br10.17755 (6)0.2991 (3)0.27753 (6)0.0443 (5)
Br20.11718 (8)0.7463 (3)0.54198 (6)0.0562 (5)
S10.00225 (17)0.7354 (6)0.36201 (13)0.0393 (7)
C10.0301 (5)0.581 (2)0.2918 (4)0.0331 (17)
C20.1140 (5)0.480 (2)0.3291 (4)0.0354 (17)
C40.0973 (6)0.650 (2)0.4373 (5)0.041 (2)
C30.1540 (5)0.521 (2)0.4129 (4)0.0411 (19)
H30.21090.46690.44590.049*
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top
U11U22U33U12U13U23
Br10.0524 (7)0.0457 (7)0.0483 (7)0.0023 (4)0.0344 (6)0.0050 (4)
Br20.0735 (9)0.0718 (9)0.0312 (7)0.0072 (5)0.0298 (6)0.0063 (4)
S10.0508 (15)0.0482 (13)0.0306 (12)0.0043 (9)0.0286 (11)0.0007 (8)
C10.050 (5)0.030 (4)0.034 (4)0.000 (4)0.032 (4)0.000 (3)
C20.052 (5)0.030 (4)0.034 (4)0.006 (3)0.028 (4)0.001 (3)
C40.059 (6)0.042 (5)0.028 (4)0.003 (4)0.025 (4)0.006 (3)
C30.050 (5)0.046 (5)0.035 (4)0.003 (4)0.025 (4)0.005 (4)
Geometric parameters (Å, °) top
Br1—C21.882 (8)C1—C1i1.455 (15)
Br2—C41.873 (8)C2—C31.422 (11)
S1—C41.719 (9)C4—C31.342 (11)
S1—C11.741 (7)C3—H30.9300
C1—C21.365 (11)
C4—S1—C191.0 (4)C3—C4—S1114.3 (6)
C2—C1—C1i131.0 (8)C3—C4—Br2126.8 (7)
C2—C1—S1109.2 (6)S1—C4—Br2118.9 (5)
C1i—C1—S1119.8 (7)C4—C3—C2109.8 (8)
C1—C2—C3115.6 (7)C4—C3—H3125.1
C1—C2—Br1124.7 (6)C2—C3—H3125.1
C3—C2—Br1119.6 (6)
C4—S1—C1—C20.9 (6)C1—S1—C4—C31.7 (7)
C4—S1—C1—C1i179.8 (5)C1—S1—C4—Br2179.2 (5)
C1i—C1—C2—C3179.2 (5)S1—C4—C3—C21.9 (10)
S1—C1—C2—C30.1 (9)Br2—C4—C3—C2179.1 (6)
C1i—C1—C2—Br10.2 (11)C1—C2—C3—C41.2 (11)
S1—C1—C2—Br1179.4 (4)Br1—C2—C3—C4179.4 (6)
Symmetry codes: (i) −x, y, −z+1/2.
Acknowledgements top

Financial support of this project by the Program for Changjiang Scholars and Innovative Research Team in Universities (No. IRT0526) and Shanghai Natural Science Foundation (No. 06ZR14001) is acknowledged.

references
References top

Bruker (2001). SMART and SAINT. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.

Funahashi, M. & Hanna, J.-I. (2005). Adv. Mater. 17, 594–598.

Lin, H.-C., Sung, H.-H., Tsai, C.-M. & Li, K.-C. (2005). Polymer, 46, 9810–9820.

Roncali, J. (1997). Chem. Rev. 97, 173–205.

Sheldrick, G. M. (2004). SADABS. University of Göttingen, Germany.

Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122.

Takahashi, M., Masui, K., Sekiguchi, H., Kobayashi, N., Mori, A., Funahashi, M. & Tamaoki, N. (2006). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 128, 10930–10933.