supplementary materials


lh2792 scheme

Acta Cryst. (2009). E65, o1213    [ doi:10.1107/S1600536809016213 ]

Di-2-pyridyl disulfide-succinic acid (1/1)

C. Zhang, L. Yuan, J.-Y. Liu and W. Xu

Abstract top

In the title compound, C10H8N2S2·C4H6O2, both components of the cocrystal lie on crystallographic twofold rotation axes. In the di-2-pyridyl disulfide molecule, the dihedral angle between the two pyridine rings is 66.6 (1)°. In the crystal structure, intermolecular O-H...N and weak C-H...O hydrogen bonds link both types of molecules into columns along the c axis.

Comment top

The design of cocrystals has been a field of intensive research in recent years. With reliable design strategies, cocrystals could offer a modular approach to developing materials with desirable properties. (Desiraju, 2003; Thalladi et al., 2007). Weak noncovalent interactions such as hydrogen bonds are utilized to create cocrystals. Herein we report the structure of the title cocrystal.

The formula unit of the title compound (Fig. 1) contains one molecule of di-2-pyridyl disulfide (dpds) and one molecule succinic acid. The dihedral angle between the two pyridine rings of the dpds molecule is 66.6 (1)°, and the S—S bond length, 2.025 (2) Å, is not significantly different than that found in the structure of the free ligand, 2.016 (2) Å (Raghavan et al., 1977). The torsion angle of the C6-C7-C7ii-C6ii [symmetry code: (ii) -x, y, -z+3/2] backbone of succinic acid is 74.5 (3)°. The proton of the carboxylate O atom (O2) of the succinic acid molecule forms a strong hydrogen bond with atom N1 of the dpds molecule (see Table 1 for hydrogen bond geometry). In addition, in the crystal structure, weak intermolecular C-H···O hydrogen bonds supplement intermolecular N-H···O hydrogen bonds to form columns running parallel to the c-axis (Fig 2).

Related literature top

For general background to the design of cocrystals, see: Desiraju (2003); Thalladi et al. (2007). For a related structure, see: Raghavan et al. (1977).

Experimental top

All chemicals were reagent grade quality obtained from commercial sources and without further purification. Dpds (0.2206 g, 1 mmol) and succinic acid (0.1181 g, 1 mmol) were dissolved in a H2O/EtOH solution (v/v = 2:1, 15 ml), which was stirred for 0.5 h and then filtrated, the filtrate was allowed to concentrate by slow evaporation to give colorless block crystals.

Refinement top

H atoms bonded to C atoms were palced in geometrically calculated positions (C-H = 0.93-0.97Å) and were refined in a riding-model approximation, with Uiso(H) = 1.2 Ueq(C). The H atom bonded to O2 atoms was located in a difference Fourier map and its position refined with Uiso(H) = 1.5 Ueq(O).

Computing details top

Data collection: RAPID-AUTO (Rigaku, 1998); cell refinement: RAPID-AUTO (Rigaku, 1998); data reduction: CrystalStructure (Rigaku/MSC, 2004); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: ORTEPII (Johnson, 1976); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008).

Figures top
[Figure 1] Fig. 1. The molecular structure of the title compound with dispalcement ellipsoids drawn at the 45% probability level. The complete molecules of di-2-pyridyl disulfide and succinic acid are generated by the symmetry operators (-x, y, -z+1/2) and (-x, y, -z+3/2) respectively.
[Figure 2] Fig. 2. Part of the crystal structure of the title compound with hydrogen bonds shown as dashed lines.
Di-2-pyridyl disulfide–succinic acid (1/1) top
Crystal data top
C10H8N2S2·C4H6O4F000 = 704
Mr = 338.39Dx = 1.430 Mg m3
Monoclinic, C2/cMo Kα radiation
λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -C 2ycCell parameters from 4565 reflections
a = 8.4211 (17) Åθ = 3.1–27.5º
b = 13.347 (3) ŵ = 0.36 mm1
c = 14.141 (3) ÅT = 293 K
β = 98.43 (3)ºBlock, colorless
V = 1572.2 (6) Å30.60 × 0.47 × 0.23 mm
Z = 4
Data collection top
Rigaku R-AXIS RAPID
diffractometer
1799 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube1490 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Monochromator: graphiteRint = 0.039
Detector resolution: 0 pixels mm-1θmax = 27.5º
T = 293 Kθmin = 3.1º
ω scansh = 10→10
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(ABSCOR; Higashi, 1995)
k = 17→17
Tmin = 0.822, Tmax = 0.921l = 18→16
7089 measured reflections
Refinement top
Refinement on F2Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
Least-squares matrix: fullHydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.053H atoms treated by a mixture of
independent and constrained refinement
wR(F2) = 0.139  w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0282P)2 + 3.2667P]
where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
S = 1.28(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
1799 reflectionsΔρmax = 0.40 e Å3
128 parametersΔρmin = 0.30 e Å3
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methodsExtinction correction: none
Crystal data top
C10H8N2S2·C4H6O4V = 1572.2 (6) Å3
Mr = 338.39Z = 4
Monoclinic, C2/cMo Kα
a = 8.4211 (17) ŵ = 0.36 mm1
b = 13.347 (3) ÅT = 293 K
c = 14.141 (3) Å0.60 × 0.47 × 0.23 mm
β = 98.43 (3)º
Data collection top
Rigaku R-AXIS RAPID
diffractometer
1799 independent reflections
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(ABSCOR; Higashi, 1995)
1490 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Tmin = 0.822, Tmax = 0.921Rint = 0.039
7089 measured reflections
Refinement top
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.053128 parameters
wR(F2) = 0.139H atoms treated by a mixture of
independent and constrained refinement
S = 1.28Δρmax = 0.40 e Å3
1799 reflectionsΔρmin = 0.30 e Å3
Special details top

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.

Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/Ueq
N10.1474 (3)0.58448 (17)0.44834 (16)0.0396 (6)
C10.1175 (3)0.56306 (19)0.36047 (19)0.0349 (6)
C20.1815 (4)0.4813 (2)0.3079 (2)0.0436 (7)
H2A0.15800.46920.24660.052*
C30.2816 (4)0.4183 (2)0.3497 (3)0.0518 (8)
H3A0.32730.36270.31650.062*
C40.3132 (4)0.4382 (2)0.4408 (3)0.0540 (8)
H4A0.37920.39610.47020.065*
C50.2449 (4)0.5218 (2)0.4873 (2)0.0474 (7)
H5A0.26730.53560.54840.057*
S10.02142 (10)0.65005 (6)0.32235 (6)0.0473 (3)
C60.0647 (3)0.7501 (2)0.63801 (19)0.0362 (6)
C70.0187 (4)0.8324 (2)0.69918 (19)0.0395 (6)
H7A0.01280.89650.66990.047*
H7B0.13370.82540.70080.047*
O10.1622 (3)0.69379 (16)0.66296 (15)0.0513 (6)
O20.0193 (3)0.74777 (17)0.55229 (15)0.0523 (6)
H2H0.065 (5)0.701 (3)0.521 (3)0.079*
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top
U11U22U33U12U13U23
N10.0424 (14)0.0434 (13)0.0345 (12)0.0021 (11)0.0106 (10)0.0002 (9)
C10.0338 (15)0.0335 (13)0.0394 (14)0.0023 (11)0.0122 (11)0.0003 (10)
C20.0500 (19)0.0368 (15)0.0474 (17)0.0022 (13)0.0184 (13)0.0075 (12)
C30.055 (2)0.0339 (15)0.069 (2)0.0067 (14)0.0180 (16)0.0032 (14)
C40.053 (2)0.0447 (17)0.069 (2)0.0020 (15)0.0237 (16)0.0166 (15)
C50.0502 (19)0.0556 (18)0.0399 (16)0.0046 (15)0.0177 (13)0.0109 (13)
S10.0518 (5)0.0440 (4)0.0515 (5)0.0135 (4)0.0255 (4)0.0117 (3)
C60.0394 (16)0.0363 (14)0.0330 (13)0.0031 (12)0.0057 (11)0.0053 (10)
C70.0424 (16)0.0387 (14)0.0372 (15)0.0043 (12)0.0054 (12)0.0025 (11)
O10.0617 (15)0.0510 (13)0.0432 (12)0.0169 (11)0.0140 (10)0.0003 (9)
O20.0669 (16)0.0549 (14)0.0390 (12)0.0156 (12)0.0205 (10)0.0064 (9)
Geometric parameters (Å, °) top
N1—C11.334 (3)C5—H5A0.9300
N1—C51.345 (4)S1—S1i2.0251 (17)
C1—C21.385 (4)C6—O11.204 (3)
C1—S11.787 (3)C6—O21.324 (3)
C2—C31.384 (4)C6—C71.507 (4)
C2—H2A0.9300C7—C7ii1.516 (5)
C3—C41.380 (5)C7—H7A0.9700
C3—H3A0.9300C7—H7B0.9700
C4—C51.378 (5)O2—H2H0.83 (4)
C4—H4A0.9300
C1—N1—C5117.2 (3)N1—C5—H5A118.5
N1—C1—C2123.9 (3)C4—C5—H5A118.5
N1—C1—S1111.3 (2)C1—S1—S1i106.10 (10)
C2—C1—S1124.8 (2)O1—C6—O2123.7 (3)
C3—C2—C1117.6 (3)O1—C6—C7124.6 (3)
C3—C2—H2A121.2O2—C6—C7111.7 (2)
C1—C2—H2A121.2C6—C7—C7ii113.6 (2)
C4—C3—C2119.7 (3)C6—C7—H7A108.8
C4—C3—H3A120.2C7ii—C7—H7A108.8
C2—C3—H3A120.2C6—C7—H7B108.8
C5—C4—C3118.5 (3)C7ii—C7—H7B108.8
C5—C4—H4A120.7H7A—C7—H7B107.7
C3—C4—H4A120.7C6—O2—H2H109 (3)
N1—C5—C4123.1 (3)
Symmetry codes: (i) −x, y, −z+1/2; (ii) −x, y, −z+3/2.
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
O2—H2H···N10.83 (4)1.94 (4)2.759 (3)173 (4)
C2—H2A···O1iii0.932.473.128 (4)127
Symmetry codes: (iii) x, −y+1, z−1/2.
Table 1
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)
top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
O2—H2H···N10.83 (4)1.94 (4)2.759 (3)173 (4)
C2—H2A···O1i0.932.473.128 (4)127
Symmetry codes: (i) x, −y+1, z−1/2.
Acknowledgements top

This project was sponsored by the K. C. Wong Magna Fund of Ningbo University and supported by the Expert Project of Key Basic Research of the Ministry of Science and Technology of China (grant No. 2003CCA00800), the Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation (grant No. Z203067) and the Ningbo Municipal Natural Science Foundation (grant No. 2006 A610061).

references
References top

Desiraju, G. R. (2003). J. Mol. Struct. 656, 5-15.

Higashi, T. (1995). ABSCOR. Rigaku Corporation, Tokyo, Japan.

Johnson, C. K. (1976). ORTEPII. Report ORNL-5138. Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Tennessee, USA.

Raghavan, N. V. & Seff, K. (1977). Acta Cryst. B33, 386–391.

Rigaku (1998). RAPID-AUTO. Rigaku Corporation, Tokyo, Japan.

Rigaku/MSC (2004). CrystalStructure. Rigaku/MSC, The Woodlands, Texas, USA.

Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122.

Thalladi, V. R., Dabros, M., Gehrke, A., Weiss, H. C. & Boese, R. (2007). Cryst. Growth Des. 7, 598–599.