research papers\(\def\hfill{\hskip 5em}\def\hfil{\hskip 3em}\def\eqno#1{\hfil {#1}}\)

Journal logoSTRUCTURAL
CHEMISTRY
ISSN: 2053-2296

N-Cyclo­amino substituent effects on the packing architecture of ortho-sul­fan­il­amide mol­ecular crystals and their in silico carbonic anhydrase II and IX inhibitory activities

crossmark logo

aDepartment of Chemistry, University of Lagos, Akoka-Yaba, Lagos, Nigeria, and bDepartment of Chemistry, Nelson Mandela University, Port Elizabeth, 6031, South Africa
*Correspondence e-mail: adeniyi.ogunlaja@mandela.ac.za, familonio@unilag.edu.ng

Edited by T. Ohhara, J-PARC Center, Japan Atomic Energy Agency, Japan (Received 2 August 2022; accepted 19 October 2022; online 8 November 2022)

In the search for new `sulfa drugs' with therapeutic properties, o-nitro­sul­fonamides and N-cyclo­amino-o-sul­fan­il­amides were synthesized and characterized using techniques including 1H NMR, 13C NMR and FT–IR spectroscopy, and single-crystal X-ray diffraction (SC-XRD). The calculated density functional theory (DFT)-optimized geometry of the mol­ecules showed similar conformations to those obtained by SC-XRD. Mol­ecular docking of N-piperidinyl-o-sul­fan­il­amide and N-indolinyl-o-sul­fan­il­amide supports the notion that o-sul­fan­il­amides are able to bind to human carbonic anhydrase II and IX inhibitors (hCA II and IX; PDB entries 4iwz and 5fl4). Hirshfeld surface analyses and DFT studies of three o-nitro­sul­fonamides {1-[(2-nitro­phen­yl)sul­fon­yl]pyrrolidine, C10H12N2O4S, 1, 1-[(2-nitro­phen­yl)sul­fon­yl]piperidine, C11H14N2O4S, 2, and 1-[(2-nitro­phen­yl)sul­fon­yl]-2,3-di­hydro-1H-indole, C14H12N2O4S, 3} and three N-cyclo­amino-o-sul­fan­il­amides [2-(pyrrolidine-1-sul­fon­yl)aniline, C10H14N2O2S, 4, 2-(piperidine-1-sul­fon­yl)aniline, C11H16N2O2S, 5, and 2-(2,3-di­hydro-1H-indole-1-sul­fon­yl)aniline, C14H14N2O2S, 6] suggested that forces such as hydro­gen bonding and ππ inter­actions hold mol­ecules together and further showed that charge transfer could promote bioactivity and the ability to form biological inter­actions at the piperidinyl and phenyl moieties.

1. Introduction

Sulfanilamide (4-amino­benzene­sul­fonamide) is aptly des­cribed as the antecedent of the group of therapeutics known as `sulfa drugs', which ushered in the modern era of anti­bacterial chemotherapy (Ajani et al., 2012[Ajani, O. O., Familoni, O. B., Wu, F., Echeme, J. O. & Sujiang, Z. (2012). Int. J. Med. Chem. 2012, 367815.]). Although it had been a com­ponent of a staple azo dye in the colour industry since the beginning of the 20th century, it did not gain prominence in medicine until the 1930s when Gerhard Domagk and co-workers patented Prontosil, A (Fig. 1[link]), a sul­fan­il­amide pro­drug, which not only revolutionized the treatment of bacterial infections, but chemotherapy as a whole, and led to the development of other drugs for non-infectious diseases.

[Figure 1]
Figure 1
Sulfanilamides and some prodrugs.

It has been established that the bacteriostatic properties of sul­fan­il­amides (Fig. 1[link]) are predicated based on two major motifs: the aryl amine (–NH2) and sul­fonamide (–SO2NHR) groups (Lesch, 2007[Lesch, J. E. (2007). The First Miracle Drugs: How the Sulfa Drugs Transformed Medicine, edited by John E. Lesch, pp. 1-364. Oxford University Press.]). A free or hydrolysable substituted amino (–NHR′) moiety that is para to the sul­fonamido group has been reported to be crucial for anti­bacterial activity, whereas modification of the position to the ortho and/or meta position results in non-anti­bacterial activities (Ajani et al., 2012[Ajani, O. O., Familoni, O. B., Wu, F., Echeme, J. O. & Sujiang, Z. (2012). Int. J. Med. Chem. 2012, 367815.]). The derivatization of the sul­fonamido group with heterocycles has also produced more potent anti­biotics (Ajani et al., 2012[Ajani, O. O., Familoni, O. B., Wu, F., Echeme, J. O. & Sujiang, Z. (2012). Int. J. Med. Chem. 2012, 367815.]; Lesch, 2007[Lesch, J. E. (2007). The First Miracle Drugs: How the Sulfa Drugs Transformed Medicine, edited by John E. Lesch, pp. 1-364. Oxford University Press.]). In addition, it has been long reported that no correlations exist between the toxicities and therapeutic efficiencies, as well as toxicities and solubilities, of the three isomers of sul­fan­il­amide, as evidenced by the finding that even though meta-sul­fan­il­amide C was the least toxic of the three, only para-sul­fan­il­amide B possessed bacteriostatic activity (Laug & Morris, 1939[Laug, E. P. & Morris, H. J. (1939). Exp. Biol. Med. 42, 541-543.]). Notably, the inhibitions of the Helicobacter pylori α-class carbonic anhydrase (hpCA) (Nishimori et al., 2006[Nishimori, I., Minakuchi, T., Morimoto, K., Sano, S., Onishi, S., Takeuchi, H., Vullo, D., Scozzafava, A. & Supuran, C. T. (2006). J. Med. Chem. 49, 2117-2126.]) and tumour-associated transmembrane carbonic anhydrase IX (CA IX) (Vullo et al., 2003[Vullo, D., Franchi, M., Gallori, E., Pastorek, J., Scozzafava, A., Pastorekova, S. & Supuran, C. T. (2003). Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 13, 1005-1009.]) isozymes have been observed with ortho-sul­fan­il­amide D (orthanilam­ide). Sulfonamides E are derivatives of sul­fan­il­amide and remain an important class of drugs, with anti­bacterial and non-anti­bacterial potencies, such as diuretic, anti­microbial, anti-epileptic, anti­leprotic, anti­malarial, hypoglycemic, anti­retro­viral, anti­thyroid and anti-inflammatory activities (Gul et al., 2016[Gul, H. I., Tugrak, M., Sakagami, H., Taslimi, P., Gulcin, I. & Supuran, C. T. (2016). J. Enzyme Inhib. Med. Chem. 31, 1619-1624.]; Henry, 1943[Henry, R. J. (1943). Bacteriol. Rev. 7, 175-262.]; Casini et al., 2002[Casini, A., Scozzafava, A., Mastrolorenzo, A. & Supuran, L. T. (2002). Curr. Cancer Drug Targets, 2, 55-75.]; Mohan et al., 2006[Mohan, R., Banerjee, M., Ray, A., Manna, T., Wilson, L., Owa, T., Bhattacharyya, B. & Panda, D. (2006). Biochemistry, 45, 5440-5449.]; Alex & Storer, 2010[Alex, A. A. & Storer, R. I. (2010). Metabolism, Pharmacokinetics and Toxicity of Functional Groups: Impact of Chemical Building Blocks on ADMET, edited by D. A. Smith, pp. 1-60. RSC Drug Discovery Series. Cambridge: Royal Society of Chemistry.]).

They also inhibit carbonic anhydrase (Gul et al., 2016[Gul, H. I., Tugrak, M., Sakagami, H., Taslimi, P., Gulcin, I. & Supuran, C. T. (2016). J. Enzyme Inhib. Med. Chem. 31, 1619-1624.]; Ghorab et al., 2014[Ghorab, M. M., Alsaid, M. S., Ceruso, M., Nissan, Y. M. & Supuran, C. T. (2014). Bioorg. Med. Chem. 22, 3684-3695.]; Nocentini et al., 2016[Nocentini, A., Ferraroni, M., Carta, F., Ceruso, M., Gratteri, P., Lanzi, C., Masini, E. & Supuran, C. T. (2016). J. Med. Chem. 59, 10692-10704.]) and have been reported to show in vivo and/or in vitro anti­tumour activities (Boyland, 1946[Boyland, E. (1946). Biochem. J. 40, 55-58.]). Many of these sul­fonamide-based (sulfa) drugs, reported to be in clinical trials, are devoid of the side effects plaguing most of the current pharmacological agents (Casini et al., 2002[Casini, A., Scozzafava, A., Mastrolorenzo, A. & Supuran, L. T. (2002). Curr. Cancer Drug Targets, 2, 55-75.]; Owa et al., 2002[Owa, T., Yokoi, A., Yamazaki, K., Yoshimatsu, K., Yamori, T. & Nagasu, T. (2002). J. Med. Chem. 45, 4913-4922.]; Lavanya, 2017[Lavanya, R. (2017). Int. J. Pharm. Sci. Invent. 6, 1-3.]; Andreucci et al., 2019[Andreucci, E., Ruzzolini, J., Peppicelli, S., Bianchini, F., Laurenzana, A., Carta, F., Supuran, C. T. & Calorini, L. (2019). J. Enzyme Inhib. Med. Chem. 34, 117-123.]).

The identification of pharmacologically active moieties in model mol­ecules and lead candidates of physiological significance from a vast array of substances, with the potential of further optimization, is a crucial facet of rational drug design and discovery (Voronin et al., 2020[Voronin, A. P., Volkova, T. V., Ilyukhin, A. B., Proshin, A. N. & Perlovich, G. L. (2020). CrystEngComm, 22, 349-360.]). The process of optimization, it must be noted, typically involves structure–activity relationship studies that facilitate the selection of mol­ecules with optimal receptor affinities (Bloom & Laubach, 1962[Bloom, B. M. & Laubach, G. D. (1962). Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. 2, 67-108.]; Kalgutkar et al., 2010[Kalgutkar, A. S., Jones, R. & Sawant, A. (2010). Metabolism, Pharmacokinetics and Toxicity of Functional Groups: Impact of Chemical Building Blocks on ADMET, edited by D. A. Smith, pp. 210-274. RSC Drug Discovery Series. Cambridge: Royal Society of Chemistry.]; Sly & Hu, 1995[Sly, W. S. & Hu, P. Y. (1995). Annu. Rev. Biochem. 64, 375-401.]; Lehtonen et al., 2004[Lehtonen, J., Shen, B., Vihinen, M., Casini, A., Scozzafava, A., Supuran, C. T., Parkkila, A. K., Saarnio, J., Kivelä, A. J., Waheed, A., Sly, W. S. & Parkkila, S. (2004). J. Biol. Chem. 279, 2719-2727.]; Żołnowska et al., 2014[Żołnowska, B., Sławiński, J., Pogorzelska, A., Chojnacki, J., Vullo, D. & Supuran, C. T. (2014). Eur. J. Med. Chem. 71, 135-147.]; Thiry et al., 2008[Thiry, A., Supuran, C. T., Masereel, B. & Dogné, J. M. (2008). J. Med. Chem. 51, 3051-3056.]; Angeli et al., 2020[Angeli, A., Ferraroni, M., Pinteala, M., Maier, S. S., Simionescu, B. C., Carta, F., Del Prete, S., Capasso, C. & Supuran, C. T. (2020). Molecules, 25, 2269.]; Güzel-Akdemir et al., 2015[Güzel-Akdemir, Ö., Akdemir, A., Karalı, N. & Supuran, C. T. (2015). Org. Biomol. Chem. 13, 6493-6499.]; Rutkauskas et al., 2014[Rutkauskas, K., Zubrienė, A., Tumosienė, I., Kantminienė, K., Kažemėkaitė, M., Smirnov, A., Kazokaitė, J., Morkūnaitė, V., Čapkauskaitė, E., Manakova, E., Gražulis, S., Beresnevičius, Z. & Matulis, D. (2014). Molecules, 19, 17356-17380.]; Congiu et al., 2014[Congiu, C., Onnis, V., Balboni, G. & Supuran, C. T. (2014). Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 24, 1776-1779.]; Temperini et al., 2008a[Temperini, C., Cecchi, A., Scozzafava, A. & Supuran, C. T. (2008a). Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 18, 2567-2573.],b[Temperini, C., Cecchi, A., Scozzafava, A. & Supuran, C. T. (2008b). Org. Biomol. Chem. 6, 2499-2506.]; Chiche et al., 2010[Chiche, J., Brahimi-Horn, M. C. & Pouysségur, J. (2010). J. Cell. Mol. Med. 14, 771-794.]; Türeci et al., 1998[Türeci, Ö., Sahin, U., Vollmar, E., Siemer, S., Göttert, E., Seitz, G., Parkkila, A. K., Shah, G. N., Grubb, J. H., Pfreundschuh, M. & Sly, W. S. (1998). Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 95, 7608-7613.]; PDB, http://www.rcsb.org/pdb; Berman et al., 2000[Berman, H. M., Westbrook, J., Feng, Z., Gilliland, G., Bhat, T. N., Weissig, H., Shindyalov, I. N. & Bourne, P. E. (2000). Nucleic Acids Res. 28, 235-242.]). In continuation of the design of potential `sulfa drugs', we report the synthesis, structural and theoretical studies, and docking application of the o-nitro­sul­fonamides 1-[(2-nitro­phen­yl)sul­fon­yl]pyrrolidine, 1, 1-[(2-nitro­phen­yl)sul­fon­yl]pi­peri­dine, 2, and 1-[(2-nitro­phen­yl)sul­fon­yl]-2,3-di­hydro-1H-indole, 3, and the N-cyclo­amino-o-sul­fan­il­amides 2-(pyrrolidine-1-sul­fon­yl)aniline, 4, 2-(piperidine-1-sul­fon­yl)aniline, 5, and 2-(2,3-di­hydro-1H-indole-1-sul­fon­yl)aniline, 6. The crystal structures, density functional theory (DFT) studies, Hirshfeld surface analysis, mol­ecular electrostatic potential and electronic properties of the title sul­fonamides and sul­fan­il­amides (16) have been discussed. Mol­ecular docking experiments with carbonic anhydrase II (PDB entry 4iwz) and IX (5fl4) active sites were conducted in order to predict their binding inter­actions with 16 (Scheme 1[link]).

[Scheme 1]

2. Experimental

2.1. Instruments and measurements

All reagents were purchased from Millipore Sigma (Ger­many and South Africa) and were used without purification. The melting points were determined on an Electrothermal digital melting-point apparatus and are uncorrected. Reactions were monitored by thin-layer chromatography (TLC) on Merck silica gel 60 F254 precoated plates using a di­chloro­methane/n-hexane (2 or 1.4:1 v/v) solvent system visualized under a UV lamp (254 nm). Column chromatography was performed with silica gel (70–230 mesh ASTM) and mobile phases were as indicated. Sample crystallization was achieved by the slow evaporation of the indicated solvent systems at ambient tem­per­ature. IR spectra were obtained using a Bruker Tensor 27 platinum ATR–FT–IR spectrometer. The ATR–FT–IR spectra were acquired in a single mode with a resolution of 4 cm−1 over 32 scans, in the region 4000–650 cm−1. 1H and 13C NMR spectra were recorded, in CDCl3, on a Bruker 400 MHz spectrometer. Chemical shift (δ) values were measured in parts per million (ppm) downfield from tetra­methyl­silane (TMS) and coupling constants (J) are reported in hertz (Hz). Theoretical studies were performed for the com­pounds and, in each case, their SC-XRD structures were used for optimization and global reactivity descriptor (GRD) calculations.

2.2. Synthesis and crystallization

2.2.1. Synthesis of N-cyclo­amino-o-nitro­benzene­sul­fon­amides 1–3

o-Nitro­benzene­sul­fonyl chloride (1.00 mmol) was added slowly to a stirring dried toluene solution (30 ml) of the cyclo­amine (2.20 mmol) at ambient tem­per­ature and stirred for 12 h, monitored by TLC. The reaction mixture was then diluted with di­chloro­methane (30 ml) and washed with distilled water (3 × 10 ml). The organic layer was separated, dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate, filtered and concentrated to an oil, which was purified by column chromatography on silica gel (di­chloro­methane/n-hexane, 2:1 v/v). Crystals were obtained by the slow solvent evaporation of the requisite eluates at ambient tem­per­ature, except for 5, which was recrystallized from di­chloro­methane, slowly evaporated and filtered to give single crystals.

2.2.1.1. N-Pyrrolidinyl-o-nitro­benzene­sul­fonamide, 1. o-Nitro­benzene­sul­fonyl chloride (3.00 g, 13.54 mmol) and pyrrolidine (2.12 g, 2.45 ml, 29.81 mmol). Yellow crystals (2.95 g, 85%); RF = 0.44 (CH2Cl2/n-hexane, 2:1 v/v); m.p. 81.7–81.9 °C. IR (Bruker, ATR, ν, cm−1): 3080 (aryl C—H str.), 2968 (sp3-C—H str.), 1597 (aryl C=C str.), 1543 (asym C—NO2 str.), 1344 (sym C—NO2 str.), 1342 (asym SO2—N str.), 1163 (sym SO2—N str.), 1078 (C—N str.). 1H NMR (Bruker, 400 MHz, CDCl3, δH, ppm): 7.94 (1H, d, J = 8 Hz, ArH), 7.62 (2H, t, J = 4 Hz, ArH), 7.54 (1H, d, J = 8 Hz, ArH), 3.37–3.35 (4H, m, –CH2NCH2–), 1.85 (4H, m, –CH2CH2–). 13C NMR (Bruker, 100 MHz, CDCl3, δC, ppm): 148.4, 133.5, 132.1, 131.5, 130.6, 123.9 (ArH), 48.2 (–CH2NCH2–), 25.9 (–CH2CH2–).

2.2.1.2. N-Piperidinyl-o-nitro­benzene­sul­fonamide, 2. o-Nitro­benzene­sul­fonyl chloride (5.00 g, 22.57 mmol) and piperidine (3.84 g, 4.45 ml, 45.1 mmol). Yellow crystals (4.97 g, 81.5%); RF = 0.56 (CH2Cl2/n-hexane, 2:1 v/v); m.p. 91.6–91.8 °C. IR (Bruker, ATR, ν, cm−1): 3076 (aryl C—H str.), 2947 (sp3-C—H str.), 1552 (aryl C=C str.), 1550 (asym C—NO2 str.), 1354 (sym C—NO2 str.), 1350 (asym SO2—N str.), 1166 (sym SO2—N str.), 1056 (C—N str.). 1H NMR (Bruker, 400 MHz, CDCl3, δH, ppm): 7.96 (1H, d, J = 4 Hz, ArH), 7.70 (2H, t, J = 4 Hz, ArH), 7.59 (1H, d, J = 8 Hz, ArH), 3.26–3.24 (4H, m, –CH2NCH2–), 1.64–1.63 (4H, m, –CH2CH2CH2–), 1.55–1.54 (2H, m, –CH2CH2CH2–). 13C NMR (Bruker, 100 MHz, CDCl3, δC, ppm): 148.5, 133.6, 131.6, 131.5, 130.8, 123.5 (ArH), 47.0 (–CH2NCH2–), 25.4 (–CH2CH2CH2–), 23.5 (–CH2CH2CH2–).

2.2.1.3. N-Indolinyl-o-nitro­benzene­sul­fonamide, 3. o-Nitro­benzene­sul­fonyl chloride (3.00 g, 13.54 mmol) and indoline (3.55 g, 3.34 ml, 29.79 mmol). Yellow crystals (3.11 g, 75.5%); RF = 0.79 (CH2Cl2/n-hexane, 2:1 v/v); m.p. 106.5–106.8 °C. IR (Bruker, ATR, ν, cm−1): 3077 (aryl C—H str.), 2976 (sp3-C—H str.), 1594 (aryl C=C str.), 1536 (asym C—NO2 str.), 1356 (sym C—NO2 str.), 1355 (asym SO2—N str.), 1161 (sym SO2—N str.), 1051 (C—N str.). 1H NMR (Bruker, 400 MHz, CDCl3, δH, ppm): 7.95 (1H, d, J = 8 Hz, ArH), 7.71 (1H, t, J = 8 Hz, ArH), 7.62 (2H, t, J = 8 Hz, ArH), 7.48 (1H, d, J = 8 Hz, ArH), 7.21 (2H, t, J = 8 Hz, ArH), 7.05 (1H, t, J = 8 Hz, ArH), 4.17 (2H, t, J = 8 Hz, –NCH2–), 3.10 (2H, t, J = 8 Hz, –NCH2CH2–). 13C NMR (Bruker, 100 MHz, CDCl3, δC, ppm): 148.4, 141.1, 134.1, 131.8, 131.7, 131.6, 130.2, 127.8, 125.5, 124.3, 124.2, 114.5 (ArH), 50.5 (–NCH2–), 28.0 (–NCH2CH2–).

2.2.2. N-Cyclo­amino-o-sul­fan­il­amides 4–6

An evacuated nitro­gen-gas-filled round-bottomed flask was charged with N-cyclo­amino-o-nitro­benzene­sul­fonamides 13 (15.63 mmol) dissolved in ethanol (30 ml), at ambient tem­per­ature, and 10% palladium-on-charcoal catalyst (3.35 mol%) was added, with stirring. Hydrogen gas was then introduced via a balloon and stirring continued at ambient tem­per­ature for 12 h. The reaction mixture was filtered and the solvent was evaporated in vacuo. The resulting residue was extracted into di­chloro­methane (50 ml), dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate, filtered and concentrated under reduced pressure to afford an oil, which was purified on a silica-gel column using di­chloro­methane and n-hexane (2:1 v/v). Crystals were obtained via slow solvent evaporation of the eluates at ambient tem­per­ature.

2.2.2.1. N-Pyrrolidinyl-o-sul­fan­il­amide, 4. N-Pyrrolidinyl-o-nitro­benzene­sul­fonamide 1 (4.00 g, 15.63 mmol) with 10% palladium-on-charcoal catalyst (0.56 g, 5.26 mmol). Off-white crystals (2.90 g, 82%); RF = 0.40 (CH2Cl2/n-hexane, 2:1 v/v); m.p. 75.2–75.4 °C. IR (Bruker, ATR, ν, cm−1): 3464, 3363 (N—H str.), 3003 (aryl C—H str.), 2947 (sp3-C—H str.), 1620 (aryl C=C str.), 1323 (asym SO2—N str.), 1132 (sym SO2—N str.), 1307 (C—N str.). 1H NMR (Bruker, 400 MHz, CDCl3, δH, ppm): 7.63 (1H, d, J = 8 Hz, ArH), 7.28 (1H, t, J = 8 Hz, ArH), 6.74 (2H, d, J = 8 Hz, ArH), 5.13 (2H, s, NH), 3.31 (4H, m, –CH2NCH2–), 1.80 (4H, m, –CH2CH2–). 13C NMR (Bruker, 100 MHz, CDCl3, δC, ppm): 146.4, 134.0, 130.2, 119.1, 117.6, 117.1 (ArH), 47.8 (–CH2NCH2–), 25.2 (–CH2CH2–).

2.2.2.2. N-Piperidinyl-o-sul­fan­il­amide, 5. N-Piperidinyl-o-nitro­benzene­sul­fonamide 2 (4.00 g, 14.81 mmol) with 10% palladium-on-charcoal catalyst (0.53 g, 4.98 mmol). Off-white crystals (3.06 g, 86%); RF = 0.57 (CH2Cl2/n-hexane, 2:1 v/v); m.p. 76.6–76.8 °C. IR (Bruker, ATR, ν, cm−1): 3487; 3383 (N—H str.), 3072 (aryl C—H str.), 2947 (sp3-C—H str.), 1606 (aryl C=C str.), 1309 (asym SO2—N str.), 1136 (sym SO2—N str.), 1336 (C—N str.). 1H NMR (Bruker, 400 MHz, CDCl3, δH, ppm): 7.48 (1H, d, J = 8 Hz, ArH), 7.21 (1H, t, J = 8 Hz, ArH), 6.67 (1H, d, J = 8 Hz, ArH), 6.64 (1H, d, J = 8 Hz, ArH), 4.99 (2H, s, NH), 3.03–3.00 (4H, m, –CH2NCH2–), 1.56–1.53 (4H, m, –CH2CH2CH2–), 1.39–1.37 (2H, m, –CH2CH2CH2–). 13C NMR (Bruker, 100 MHz, CDCl3, δC, ppm): 146.3, 134.0, 130.1, 118.0, 117.6, 117.0 (ArH), 46.8 (–CH2NCH2–), 25.2 (–CH2CH2CH2–), 23.6 (–CH2CH2CH2–).

2.2.2.3. N-Indolinyl-o-sul­fan­il­amide, 6. N-Indolinyl-o-nitro­benzene­sul­fonamide 3 (2.50 g, 8.22 mmol) with 10% palladium-on-charcoal catalyst (0.29 g, 2.73 mmol). Off-white crystals (1.69 g, 75%); RF = 0.80 (CH2Cl2/n-hexane, 2:1 v/v); m.p.: 111.9–112 °C. IR (Bruker, ATR, ν, cm−1): 3448, 3367 (N—H str.), 3070 (aryl C—H str.), 2924 (sp3-C—H str.), 1597 (aryl C=C str.), 1327 (asym SO2—N str.), 1138 (sym SO2—N str.), 1330 (C—N str.). 1H NMR (Bruker, 400 MHz, CDCl3, δH, ppm): 7.48 (2H, d, J = 8 Hz, ArH), 7.16 (1H, t, J = 8 Hz, ArH), 7.08 (1H, t, J = 6 Hz, ArH), 7.03 (1H, d, J = 8 Hz, ArH), 6.90 (1H, t, J = 8 Hz, ArH), 6.58 (1H, d, J = 8 Hz, ArH), 6.55 (1H, d, J = 8 Hz, ArH), 5.00 (2H, s, NH), 3.96 (2H, t, J = 8 Hz, –NCH2–), 2.86 (2H, t, J = 8 Hz, –NCH2CH2–). 13C NMR (Bruker, 100 MHz, CDCl3, δC, ppm): 146.4, 142.3, 134.4, 132.1, 129.8, 127.6, 125.1, 123.7, 119.4, 117.7, 117.3, 115.1 (ArH), 50.0 (–NCH2–), 28.1 (–NCH2CH2). Reaction synthesis of nitro­sul­fonamides 13 and amino­sul­fonamides 46 are presented in Scheme S1 in the supporting information. The FT–IR, MS and 1H/13C NMR spectra of com­pounds 16 are also presented in the supporting information.

2.3. Docking studies

2.3.1. Preparation of the ligands for docking

The X-ray crystal structures of synthesized com­pounds 16 (CIF files) were imported directly into the Schrödinger Suite (Schrödinger, 2022[Schrödinger (2022). Schrödinger Suite. Release 2022-1. Schrödinger LLC, New York, USA. https://www.schrodinger.com/.]) for preparation. The reference drugs N-(5-sulfamoyl-1,3,4-thia­di­azol-2-yl)-2-(thio­phen-2-yl)acetamide (A) and 5-[1-(naph­tha­len-1-yl)-1,2,3-tri­azol-4-yl]thio­phene-2-sul­fon­amide (B) were based on chemical structures downloaded from the PubChem (https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/) web­site in SDF format. A and B were used as reference com­pounds because they are natural ligands in the crystalline state of 5fl4 and 4iwz. The Ligprep module of the mol­ecular model­ling platform of the Schrödinger Suite (Schrödinger, 2022[Schrödinger (2022). Schrödinger Suite. Release 2022-1. Schrödinger LLC, New York, USA. https://www.schrodinger.com/.]) was then used to prepare the imported structures by assigning bond lengths, bond angles, generating possible ionization states at pH 7 using Epik and finally to optimize using the OPLS4 force field (Nainwal et al., 2018[Nainwal, L. M., Azad, C. S., Deswal, D. & Narula, A. K. (2018). ChemistrySelect, 3, 10762-10767.]).

2.3.2. Protein preparation

The protein structures of 4iwz and 5fl4, with resolutions of 1.60 and 1.82 Å, respectively, were downloaded from the Research Collaboratory for Structural Bioinformatics (RCSB) Protein Data Bank (PDB). Retrieved crystal coordinates were prepared in the `Protein Preparation Wizard' of the Schrödinger Suite (Schrödinger, 2022[Schrödinger (2022). Schrödinger Suite. Release 2022-1. Schrödinger LLC, New York, USA. https://www.schrodinger.com/.]), with default parameters of assigning bond orders, optimizing and minimization using OPLS4. A receptor grid generation mod­ule was applied to the prepared proteins by selecting the corresponding cocrystallized ligand to define the binding site. A default parameter for the radii of van der Waals having a scaling factor of 1 Å with a partial charge cut-off of 0.25 Å was used (Panwar & Singh, 2021[Panwar, U. & Singh, S. K. (2021). Struct. Chem. 32, 337-352.]; Yang et al., 2022[Yang, A. C., Vest, R. T., Kern, F., Lee, D. P., Agam, M., Maat, C. A., Losada, P. M., Chen, M. B., Schaum, N., Khoury, N., Toland, A., Calcuttawala, K., Shin, H., Pálovics, R., Shin, A., Wang, E. Y., Luo, J., Gate, D., Schulz-Schaeffer, J. A., Chu, P., Siegenthaler, J. A., McNerney, M. W., Keller, A. & Wyss-Coray, T. (2022). Nature, 603, 885-892.]).

2.3.3. Mol­ecular docking

Docking calculations were executed in the extra precision (XP) mode of the Glide module in the mol­ecular modelling platform of the Schrödinger Suite (Schrödinger, 2022[Schrödinger (2022). Schrödinger Suite. Release 2022-1. Schrödinger LLC, New York, USA. https://www.schrodinger.com/.]). The com­plexes with the highest negative docking scores have better binding towards the respective proteins 4iwz and 5fl4. Docking calculations of the synthesized N-cyclo­amino derivatives against the hCA II (PDB entry 5fl4) and XII (4iw7) isoforms will provide a selectivity profile that may be inter­esting for the development of novel anti­cancer agents with limited side effects. The hCA II (PDB entry 5fl4) and XII (4iw7) carbonic anhydrase iso­forms have recently emerged as excellent targets for the design of novel therapeutic strategies for cancer, due to their involvement in the survival of tumour cells, as well as in the insurgence of resistance to classical anti­cancer protocols (Milite et al., 2019[Milite, C., Amendola, G., Nocentini, A., Bua, S., Cipriano, A., Barresi, E., Feoli, A., Novellino, E., Da Settimo, F., Supuran, C. T., Castellano, S., Cosconati, S. & Taliani, S. (2019). J. Enzyme Inhib. Med. Chem. 34, 1697-1710.]).

2.4. DFT calculations

Theoretical studies were performed for com­pounds 16 whereupon the SC-XRD structures of the com­pounds were used for optimization and global reactivity descriptor (GRD) calculations. Computational studies and mol­ecular electrostatic potential (MEP) for 16 were carried out using the GAUSSIAN16 software package (Frisch et al., 2016[Frisch, M. J., Trucks, G. W., Schlegel, H. B., Scuseria, G. E., Robb, M. A., Cheeseman, J. R., Scalmani, G., Barone, V., Petersson, G. A., Nakatsuji, H., Li, X., Caricato, M., Marenich, A. V., Bloino, J., Janesko, B. G., Gomperts, R., Mennucci, B., Hratchian, H. P., Ortiz, J. V., Izmaylov, A. F., Sonnenberg, J. L., Williams-Young, D., Ding, F., Lipparini, F., Egidi, F., Goings, J., Peng, B., Petrone, A., Henderson, T., Ranasinghe, D., Zakrzewski, V. G., Gao, J., Rega, N., Zheng, G., Liang, W., Hada, M., Ehara, M., Toyota, K., Fukuda, R., Hasegawa, J., Ishida, M., Nakajima, T., Honda, Y., Kitao, O., Nakai, H., Vreven, T., Throssell, K., Montgomery, J. A. Jr, Peralta, J. E., Ogliaro, F., Bearpark, M. J., Heyd, J. J., Brothers, E. N., Kudin, K. N., Staroverov, V. N., Keith, T. A., Kobayashi, R., Normand, J., Raghavachari, K., Rendell, A. P., Burant, J. C., Iyengar, S. S., Tomasi, J., Cossi, M., Millam, J. M., Klene, M., Adamo, C., Cammi, R., Ochterski, J. W., Martin, R. L., Morokuma, K., Farkas, O., Foresman, J. B. & Fox, D. J. (2016). GAUSSIAN16 and GaussView5.0. Gaussian Inc., Wallingford, CT, USA. https://gaussian.com/.]), whereas the calculations were performed using the standard hybrid density functional method (B3LYP) with a basis set of the 6-311++G**(p,d) level (Becke, 1993[Becke, A. D. (1993). J. Chem. Phys. 98, 5648-5652.]). Optimized mol­ecules were obtained with the Chemcraft visualization program (https://www.chemcraftprog.com/).

2.5. Refinement

Crystal data, data collection and structure refinement details are summarized in Table 1[link]. Carbon-bound H atoms were added in idealized geometrical positions in a riding model. Nitro­gen-bound H atoms were located in a difference map and refined freely.

Table 1
Experimental details

Experiments were carried out with Mo Kα radiation using a Bruker APEXII CCD diffractometer. Absorption was corrected for by numerical methods (SADABS; Bruker, 2008[Bruker (2008). SADABS. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.]).

  1 2 3
Crystal data
Chemical formula C10H12N2O4S C11H14N2O4S C14H12N2O4S
Mr 256.28 270.30 304.32
Crystal system, space group Monoclinic, P21/n Monoclinic, P21/n Monoclinic, P21/n
Temperature (K) 200 296 296
a, b, c (Å) 8.6173 (5), 14.6662 (9), 9.4885 (6) 8.6881 (9), 15.0266 (14), 9.8337 (10) 7.4701 (5), 23.6743 (12), 7.8614 (5)
α, β, γ (°) 90, 108.075 (3), 90 90, 106.526 (4), 90 90, 94.989 (3), 90
V3) 1140.01 (12) 1230.8 (2) 1385.02 (15)
Z 4 4 4
μ (mm−1) 0.29 0.27 0.25
Crystal size (mm) 0.67 × 0.67 × 0.12 0.48 × 0.47 × 0.45 0.62 × 0.51 × 0.43
 
Data collection
Tmin, Tmax 0.934, 1.000 0.941, 1.000 0.913, 1.000
No. of measured, independent and observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections 24329, 2849, 2508 25328, 3059, 2662 28400, 3434, 2864
Rint 0.018 0.017 0.024
(sin θ/λ)max−1) 0.669 0.668 0.669
 
Refinement
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S 0.041, 0.111, 1.05 0.036, 0.106, 1.06 0.040, 0.105, 1.05
No. of reflections 2849 3059 3434
No. of parameters 149 163 190
No. of restraints 20 0 0
H-atom treatment H-atom parameters constrained H-atom parameters constrained H-atom parameters constrained
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å−3) 0.43, −0.47 0.32, −0.31 0.26, −0.29
  4 5 6
Crystal data
Chemical formula C10H14N2O2S C11H16N2O2S C14H14N2O2S
Mr 226.29 240.32 274.33
Crystal system, space group Monoclinic, P21/c Orthorhombic, Pbca Monoclinic, P21/n
Temperature (K) 296 200 296
a, b, c (Å) 16.399 (3), 7.9485 (12), 18.376 (3) 11.1747 (4), 10.4850 (4), 20.1368 (8) 9.7990 (11), 10.2612 (13), 13.2010 (16)
α, β, γ (°) 90, 113.907 (6), 90 90, 90, 90 90, 100.682 (5), 90
V3) 2189.7 (6) 2359.36 (15) 1304.4 (3)
Z 8 8 4
μ (mm−1) 0.28 0.26 0.25
Crystal size (mm) 0.47 × 0.32 × 0.20 0.49 × 0.26 × 0.25 0.54 × 0.34 × 0.34
 
Data collection
Tmin, Tmax 0.927, 1.000 0.944, 1.000 0.925, 1.000
No. of measured, independent and observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections 55955, 5477, 4489 57075, 2935, 2583 28600, 3275, 2726
Rint 0.032 0.020 0.031
(sin θ/λ)max−1) 0.670 0.668 0.675
 
Refinement
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S 0.035, 0.107, 1.04 0.029, 0.087, 1.05 0.039, 0.113, 1.05
No. of reflections 5477 2935 3275
No. of parameters 287 153 180
No. of restraints 0 0 0
H-atom treatment H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å−3) 0.33, −0.36 0.34, −0.36 0.27, −0.43
Computer programs: APEX2 (Bruker, 2011[Bruker (2011). APEX2. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.]), SAINT (Bruker, 2012[Bruker (2012). SAINT. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.]), SHELXT2018 (Sheldrick, 2015a[Sheldrick, G. M. (2015a). Acta Cryst. A71, 3-8.]), SHELXL2018 (Sheldrick, 2015b[Sheldrick, G. M. (2015b). Acta Cryst. C71, 3-8.]), ShelXle (Hübschle et al., 2011[Hübschle, C. B., Sheldrick, G. M. & Dittrich, B. (2011). J. Appl. Cryst. 44, 1281-1284.]), ORTEP-3 for Windows (Farrugia, 2012[Farrugia, L. J. (2012). J. Appl. Cryst. 45, 849-854.]), PLATON (Spek, 2020[Spek, A. L. (2020). Acta Cryst. E76, 1-11.]) and Mercury (Macrae et al., 2020[Macrae, C. F., Sovago, I., Cottrell, S. J., Galek, P. T. A., McCabe, P., Pidcock, E., Platings, M., Shields, G. P., Stevens, J. S., Towler, M. & Wood, P. A. (2020). J. Appl. Cryst. 53, 226-235.]).

3. Results and discussion

3.1. Chemistry

The N-cyclo­amino-o-sul­fan­il­amides 46 were prepared via a two-step reaction, starting from the condensation reaction of o-nitro­benzene­sul­fonyl chloride with alicyclic amines in tolu­ene, at ambient tem­per­ature, to afford N-cyclo­amino-o-nitro­benzene­sul­fonamide adducts 13 (Scheme S1 in the supporting information). The use of toluene as a nonpolar reaction medium was, amongst other reasons, to drive the forward reaction. In the second step, adducts 13 were hydro­genated with hydro­gen gas, in ethanol at ambient tem­per­ature, in the presence of 10% palladium-on-activated charcoal catalyst to give the target N-cyclo­amino-o-sul­fan­il­amides 46 in 72–86% yield. The reactions were monitored by TLC.

All the com­pounds synthesized were characterized by their melting points and IR, 1H/13C NMR and MS spectra. In the IR spectra of o-nitro­sul­fonamide adducts 13, the strong absorption bands observed at 1355–1342 and 1171–1161 cm−1 were ascribed to the asymmetric and symmetric stretching frequencies, respectively, of the SO2—N moiety, thereby alluding to the formation of the sul­fonamide bond. The disappearances of the SO2—Cl (1420 and 1220 cm−1) and N—H (3286–3265 cm−1) stretching bands in the IR spectra of o-nitro­benzene­sul­fonyl chloride and cyclo­amines, respectively, were good indicators of a successful condensation reaction. This was corroborated by the shift of the sul­fonyl (–SO2–) absorption bands from 1420 and 1220 (in o-nitro­benzene­sul­fonyl chloride) to 1355–1342 and 1171–1161 cm−1 (in 13). It is noteworthy that the lower wavenumbers observed in the IR spectra of o-nitro­sul­fonamides 13 for –SO2– were not unusual as the Cl atom bonded to it had been replaced by a less electronegative N atom. In the IR spectra of o-sul­fan­il­amides 46, the appearance of two N—H stretching bands in the higher frequency region around 3467 ± 20 and 3383 ± 10 cm−1, and the disappearance of the nitro (NO2) absorption bands (observed at 1550–1536 and 1369–1342 cm−1) in the spectra of 13 were attributed to the successful catalytic reduction of the nitro group to the amino group.

The 1H NMR spectra of o-nitro­sul­fonamides 13 were additive of the individual spectra of the starting materials (i.e. o-nitro­benzene­sul­fonyl chloride and cyclo­amines), with the disappearance of the nitro­gen proton peaks of cyclo­amines. The aromatic protons of o-sul­fan­il­amides 46 resonated upfield in com­parison to the same aromatic protons in precursors 13. This general shift towards tetra­methyl­silane (TMS) was credited to the newly formed amino groups whose lone-pair electrons are suspected of having caused the increased mesomeric shielding of the aromatic protons. D2O-exchangeable singlets were also observed in the 1H NMR spectra of 46 between 5.13 and 4.99 ppm for the newly-formed amino protons. The success of the catalytic hydro­genation of nitro adducts 13 was corroborated by the 13C NMR spectra of 46, where the requisite C atoms (C—NO2 → C—NH2) resonated upfield in the range 133.9–130.1 ppm. The spectroscopic data analyses of the synthesized com­pounds were consistent with the assigned structures of the com­pounds.

3.2. Crystal structure

The mol­ecules of 13 and 46 crystallized in the monoclinic space group P21/n or P21/c (No. 14), except for 5, which crystallized in the ortho­rhom­bic space group Pbca (No. 61). In addition, they all had one mol­ecule in the asymmetric unit, with the exception of 4, with two independent mol­ecules per asymmetric unit cell. The two mol­ecules per unit cell of com­pound 4 were identical but for the conformation of the pyrrolidine group (cf. Fig. S1 in the supporting information). It is noteworthy that the pyrrolidine ring in 1 is disordered. The mol­ecular structures of 13 and 46 are shown in Fig. 2[link], while the crystal data collection parameters of o-nitro­sul­fonamides 13 and N-cyclo­amino-o-sul­fan­il­amides 46 are presented in Table 1[link]. They are com­pared with the crystal structure data of para-sul­fan­il­amide and ortho-sul­fan­il­amide, which crystallize in the ortho­rhom­bic Pbca (No. 61) and monoclinic P21/c (No. 14) space groups, respectively (Gelbrich et al., 2008[Gelbrich, T., Bingham, A. L., Threlfall, T. L. & Hursthouse, M. B. (2008). Acta Cryst. C64, o205-o207.]; Shad et al., 2008[Shad, H. A., Chohan, Z. H., Tahir, M. N. & Khan, I. U. (2008). Acta Cryst. E64, o635.]). Several sul­fonamide derivatives have also been reported (El-Gaby et al., 2020[El-Gaby, M. A., Ammar, Y. I. H., El-Qaliei, M. M., Ali, A. F., Hussein, M. & Faraghally, A. F. (2020). Egypt. J. Chem. 63, 5289-5327.]). Selected bond lengths and angles, as determined from the SC-XRD experiments, are collected in Table S1 (see supporting information).

[Figure 2]
Figure 2
The mol­ecular structures of o-nitro­sul­fonamides 13 and N-cyclo­amino-o-sul­fan­il­amides 46 (molecule 2 of 4 shown). Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 50% probability level. Minor disorder com­ponents have been omitted.

It is instructive to note that the amino (NH2) group in N-cyclo­amino-o-sul­fan­il­amides 46 contributed significantly to their hydro­gen-bond inter­actions (cf. Table 2[link]). In all three structures, there were intra­molecular N—H⋯O=S inter­actions resulting in ring closures that can be described with S(6) graph-set descriptors (Bernstein et al., 1995[Bernstein, J., Davis, R. E., Shimoni, L. & Chang, N.-L. (1995). Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 34, 1555-1573.]; Etter et al., 1990[Etter, M. C., MacDonald, J. C. & Bernstein, J. (1990). Acta Cryst. B46, 256-262.]). Furthermore, com­pounds 5 and 6 exhibited infinite-chain inter­molecular N—H⋯O=S inter­actions with C(6) descriptors. Inter­estingly, no infinite chain inter­action was observed in 4; instead, four mol­ecules were linked into a ring structure with an R44(24) descriptor. The p-sul­fan­il­amide (Gelbrich et al., 2008[Gelbrich, T., Bingham, A. L., Threlfall, T. L. & Hursthouse, M. B. (2008). Acta Cryst. C64, o205-o207.]) and o-sul­fan­il­amide (Shad et al., 2008[Shad, H. A., Chohan, Z. H., Tahir, M. N. & Khan, I. U. (2008). Acta Cryst. E64, o635.]) structures also each have a number of infinite-chain inter­actions and ring structures. Fig. 3[link] shows selected hydro­gen-bond, C—H⋯(π ring) and ππ stacking inter­actions for sul­fonamides 13 and sul­fan­il­amides 46. All the hydro­gen bonds were of moderate (mostly electrostatic) strength (Jeffrey, 1997[Jeffrey, G. A. (1997). An Introduction to Hydrogen Bonding, p. 228. Oxford University Press.]), with 4 giving the strongest hydro­gen bonds (Table 2[link]). Additionally, the com­pounds also exhibited both intra- and inter­molecular C—H⋯O=S inter­actions, with the length of the shortest inter­actions varying in the range 2.30–2.48 Å.

Table 2
Hydrogen-bond, C—H⋯(π ring) and π–π stacking inter­action geometry (Å, °) for the crystal structures of p-sul­fan­il­amide (B), o-sul­fan­il­amide (D), o-nitro­sul­fonamides 13 and N-cyclo­amino-o-sul­fan­il­amides 46

Compound Inter­action D—H H⋯A DA D—H⋯A ππ
o-Nitrosul­fonamides
1 C11—H11A⋯O1i 0.99 2.56 3.398 (7) 143  
  C11—H11B⋯O4 0.99 2.48 3.093 (9) 120  
  C25—H25⋯O4ii 0.95 2.54 3.240 (2) 131  
  C25—H25⋯O1iii 0.95 2.47 3.229 (2) 137  
  C26—H26⋯O2 0.95 2.49 2.860 (2) 103  
  C26—H26⋯O3iv 0.95 2.56 3.467 (2) 160  
2 C11—H11A⋯O2 0.97 2.48 2.907 (2) 107  
  C11—H11A⋯O2i 0.97 2.59 3.476 (2) 152  
  C15—H15B⋯O1 0.97 2.51 2.943 (2) 107  
  C25—H25⋯O2v 0.93 2.57 3.334 (2) 140  
  C26—H26⋯O1 0.93 2.53 2.877 (2) 103  
3 C16—H16⋯O2 0.93 2.41 2.975 (2) 119  
  C16—H16⋯O2vi 0.93 2.55 3.195 (2) 127  
  C23—H23⋯O1vii 0.93 2.30 3.086 (3) 142  
  C26—H26⋯N1 0.93 2.60 2.983 (2) 105  
  Cg1⋯Cg2i         3.6967 (11)
  Cg2⋯Cg1i         3.6968 (11)
             
N-Cyclo­amino-o-sul­fan­il­amides
4 N12—H12C⋯O21 0.78 (3) 2.40 (3) 3.121 (3) 155 (3)  
  N12—H12D⋯O11 0.84 (3) 2.10 (3) 2.776 (3) 138 (3)  
  N22—H21C⋯O11i 0.82 (3) 2.30 (3) 3.106 (2) 168 (2)  
  N22—H21D⋯O21 0.87 (2) 2.07 (2) 2.783 (2) 139 (2)  
  C114—H114⋯O22viii 0.93 2.59 3.391 (3) 144  
  C116—H116⋯O12 0.93 2.46 2.851 (2) 105  
  C216—H216⋯O22′ 0.93 2.52 2.897 (2) 105  
5 N1—H1A⋯O1ix 0.836 (19) 2.496 (19) 3.2999 (16) 161.8 (16)  
  N1—H1B⋯O2 0.852 (16) 2.156 (16) 2.8240 (17) 135.1 (14)  
  C16—H16⋯O1 0.95 2.48 2.8774 (15) 105  
  C16—H16⋯O2x 0.95 2.48 3.2577 (15) 139  
  C21—H21A⋯O1 0.99 2.55 2.9635 (15) 105  
  C25—H25B⋯O2 0.99 2.44 2.8675 (16) 106  
6 N2—H2C⋯O2 0.86 (3) 2.19 (3) 2.857 (2) 134 (2)  
  N2—H2D⋯O1xi 0.89 (2) 2.22 (2) 3.098 (2) 168.8 (19)  
  C15—H15⋯O2xii 0.93 2.59 3.366 (2) 141  
  C16—H16⋯O1 0.93 2.58 3.105 (2) 117  
  C26—H26⋯O1 0.93 2.45 2.849 (2) 106  
  C1—H1BCg1xiii 0.97 2.97 3.817 (2) 147  
  S1—O2⋯Cg2i     3.5773 (15)    
Symmetry codes: (i) −x + 1, −y + 1, −z + 1; (ii) −x + [{3\over 2}], y + [{1\over 2}], z − [{1\over 2}]; (iii) x + [{1\over 2}], −y + [{3\over 2}], z + [{1\over 2}]; (iv) x + [{1\over 2}], −y + [{3\over 2}], z − [{1\over 2}]; (v) x − [{1\over 2}], −y + [{3\over 2}], z + [{1\over 2}]; (vi) −x + 2, −y + 1, −z + 1; (vii) x + [{1\over 2}], −y + [{3\over 2}], z − [{1\over 2}]; (viii) −x + 2, y − [{1\over 2}], −z + [{3\over 2}]; (ix) x − [{1\over 2}], y, −z + [{1\over 2}]; (x) −x + [{3\over 2}], y − [{1\over 2}], z; (xi) x − [{1\over 2}], −y + [{1\over 2}], z − [{1\over 2}]; (xii) x − [{1\over 2}], −y + [{1\over 2}], z + [{1\over 2}]. Centroids for 3: Cg1 N1/C1/C2/C12/C11; Cg2 C11–C16; Cg3 C21–C26; for 4: Cg1 C22–C27; for 5 Cg1 C11–C16; Cg2 N1/C2/C1/C12/C11; for 6 Cg1 C21–C26.
[Figure 3]
Figure 3
Selected hydro­gen-bond, C—H⋯(π ring) and ππ stacking inter­actions for com­pounds 16. Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 50% probability level. Minor disorder com­ponents have been omitted.

The only ππ stacking inter­action of note occurred in 3, where two centroid-to-centroid inter­actions with distances of 3.6967 (11) Å were observed between the centrosymmetric indo­line moieties. An N=O⋯π ring inter­action of 3.657 (2) Å was also evident in 3, whereas inter­molecular C—H⋯(π ring) inter­actions of 2.97 Å and S=O⋯(π ring) inter­actions of 3.5773 (15) Å were present in the structure of its hydro­genated analogue 6. The packing diagrams of the crystal structures of com­pounds 16 are shown in Fig. S2 in the supporting information.

3.3. Hirshfeld surface analysis

The Hirshfeld surface analyses (Turner et al., 2017[Turner, M. J., McKinnon, J. J., Wolff, S. K., Grimwood, D. J., Spackman, P. R., Jayatilaka, D. & Spackman, M. A. (2017). CrystalExplorer17. University of Western Australia.]) of com­pounds 16 showed inter­molecular inter­actions such as O—H⋯O, O—H⋯N and C—H⋯π. Two sharp O—H spikes typical of an O—H⋯O inter­action from 1 contributed the highest O⋯H inter­action of 42.3%. The fingerprint plots showed that C⋯H contacts were highest for 6 (30.4%), and this is closely related to C—H⋯π inter­actions (McKinnon et al., 2007[McKinnon, J. J., Jayatilaka, D. & Spackman, M. A. (2007). Chem. Commun. pp. 3814-3818.]; Kolade et al., 2020[Kolade, S. O., Izunobi, J. U., Hosten, E. C., Olasupo, I. A., Ogunlaja, A. S. & Familoni, O. B. (2020). Acta Cryst. C76, 810-820.]). The percentages of the major contributions, e.g. C⋯H, O⋯H and N⋯H inter­atomic contacts, for each mol­ecule are com­piled in Table 3[link].

Table 3
Percentage contributions of selected inter­atomic contacts to the Hirshfeld surface of com­pounds 16

  C⋯H O⋯H N⋯H
o-Nitrosul­fonamides
1 15.2 42.3 0.6
2 15.3 41.7 1.4
3 14.0 40.3 0.0
 
N-Cyclo­amino-o-sul­fan­il­amides
4 15.2 25.9 3.5
5 16.5 22.4 3.4
6 30.4 19.6 2.1

The mol­ecular Hirshfeld surfaces, mapped as dnorm, shape index and curvedness, confirmed inter­actions between neighbouring mol­ecules of 16 and are presented in Fig. S3. The large circular depressions (deep red) visible on the dnorm surfaces typically indicate that the mol­ecule has a donor site(s) (e.g. amine and/or sul­fone) or inter­actions with proteins.

Fingerprint plots of o-nitro­sul­fonamides 13 and N-cyclo­amino-o-sul­fan­il­amides 46 in full and resolved into C⋯H, O⋯H and N⋯H are presented in Fig. S4 (supporting information). The inter­molecular O⋯H and N⋯H inter­actions appear as two distinct spikes of almost equal length in the 2D (two-dimensional) fingerprint plots in the region 1.2 < (de + di) < 2.9 Å as light-sky-blue patterns in full fingerprint 2D plots and characterized to be 2.56 ± 0.21 Å corresponds to O⋯H contacts which contributes the majority of the surface area. 2D fingerprint plots reveal the contributions of these inter­actions in the crystal structure qu­anti­tatively and are presented in Table 4[link] (with minimum and maximum values of dnorm, di and de provided). Complementary regions are also visible in the fingerprint plots (Fig. S4), where one mol­ecule acts as a donor (de > di) and the other acts as an acceptor (de < di). This finding was validated by the calculated mol­ecular electrostatic potential of 16 (Fig. S5). The negative potential (acceptor) is indicated as a red surface around the O atoms attached to sulfur (–SO2) and the N atoms attached to oxygen (–NO2). The blue/purple surface area indicates that the positive potential (donor) is mapped in the proximity of the H atoms (Fig. S5).

Table 4
Surface inter­actions of o-nitro­sul­fonamides 13 and N-cyclo­amino-o-sul­fan­il­amides 46

Compound dnorm di de
  Minimum value Maximum value Minimum value Maximum value Minimum value Maximum value
1 −0.2565 0.9743 0.9092 2.3849 0.9083 2.4152
2 −0.1071 1.0914 1.0665 2.4390 1.0669 2.4804
3 −0.3223 1.7007 0.9319 2.6809 0.9322 2.6406
4 −0.3784 1.2864 0.8873 2.4989 0.9319 2.4948
5 −0.2060 1.3595 0.9944 2.6968 0.9957 2.5141
6 −0.3866 1.2989 0.8842 2.7791 0.8838 2.5779

3.4. Global reactivity descriptors (GRDs)

The full geometry of optimized mol­ecules 16 presented bond lengths similar to those obtained from the crystal data. A com­parison of selected torsion angles of the crystal structures of 16 and the DFT-optimized mol­ecules showed that con­formation of the mol­ecules did not change significantly in the DFT-optimized state (Fig. S6). Generally, the observed, almost flat, O—S—N—C torsion angle of the DFT-optimized mol­ecules suggest that the lone pairs on sulfur may have con­tributed to the π-electron delocalization that is observed in the DFT mol­ecules.

The highest occupied mol­ecular orbital (HOMO) and lowest unoccupied mol­ecular orbital (LUMO) electrons are distributed around various moieties within the various mol­ecules (Fig. 4[link]). Generally, electron distribution is mainly scattered in the HOMO over the phenyl, sulfur and indolin­yl/pyrrolidinyl rings, with the exception of 3 and 5. The LUMO is mainly spread over the phenyl moieties. This indicates that there is a transfer of charge between the indolin­yl/pyrrolidinyl rings and the phenyl moieties within the mol­ecule.

[Figure 4]
Figure 4
Frontier mol­ecular orbitals for the optimized structures of 16.

The HOMO–LUMO gap, which describes the stability of mol­ecules and predicts reactivity between species by providing the electrical transport properties, as well as electron carrier and mobility in mol­ecules (Rathi et al., 2020[Rathi, P. C., Ludlow, R. F. & Verdonk, M. L. (2020). J. Med. Chem. 63, 8778-8790.]), are provided in Table 5[link]. N-Indolinyl-o-nitro­benzene­sul­fonamide 3 displayed the smallest energy gap (3.24 eV), indicating that it was the softest mol­ecule with good polarizability and reactivity, whereas N-piperidinyl-o-sul­fan­il­amide 5 presented the largest energy gap of 4.924 eV, thereby corroborating its high chemical hardness of 2.462 eV (cf. Table 5[link]). The lowest LUMO energy was obtained from 3 (ELUMO = −3.175 eV), indicating that it is the best electron acceptor of the mol­ecules analyzed, whereas 6 was the best electron donor in the series, with the highest HOMO energy (EHOMO) of −6.142 eV (Table 5[link]). The observed large energy gap (4.924 eV) in 5 suggests that charge transfer could promote its bioactivity and ability to form biological inter­actions at the piperidinyl and phenyl moiety (Al-Wahaibi et al., 2019[Al-Wahaibi, L. H., Joubert, J., Blacque, O., Al-Shaalan, N. H. & El-Emam, A. A. (2019). Sci. Rep. 9, 19745.]). Therefore, the predicted order of biological inter­actions are 5 > 6 > 4 > 2 > 1 > 3.

Table 5
Frontier mol­ecular orbital (FMO) energies of synthesized com­pounds 16

Parameter (eV) o-Nitrosul­fonamides N-Cyclo­amino-o-sul­fan­il­amides
  1 2 3 4 5 6
HOMO energy (EHOMO) −7.228 −7.386 −6.415 −6.189 −6.211 −6.142
LUMO energy (ELUMO) −2.982 −2.973 −3.175 −1.627 −1.287 −1.451
ΔE gap 4.246 4.413 3.24 4.562 4.924 4.691
Ionization potential (I) 7.228 7.386 6.415 6.189 6.211 6.142
Electron affinity (A) 2.982 2.973 3.175 1.627 1.287 1.451
Chemical potential (μ) −5.105 −5.1795 −4.795 −3.908 −3.749 −3.7965
Electronegativity (χ) 5.105 5.1795 4.795 3.908 3.749 3.7965
Global hardness (η) 2.123 2.2065 1.62 2.281 2.462 2.3455
Global softness (S) 0.471 0.453 0.617 0.438 0.406 0.426
Global electrophilicity (ω) 27.664 29.597 18.624 17.418 17.301 16.903

The ionization potential (I), electron affinity (A), chemical potential (μ), electronegativity (χ), global hardness (η), global softness (S) and global electrophilicity (ω) values were calculated using the HOMO and LUMO energy values and are collated in Table 5[link]. The lowest I value of 6.142 eV originated from sul­fan­il­amide 6, whereas sul­fonamide 3 gave the largest A value of 3.175 eV. Amongst the com­pounds studied, 2 gave the highest χ value of 5.1795 eV. Inter­estingly, sul­fan­il­amide 5 displayed the highest η value of 2.462 eV and the lowest chemical softness (S) of 0.406 eV, thus alluding to its having the most reactive nature of all the mol­ecules investigated. The highest global electrophilicity of 29.597 eV was also recorded for sul­fonamide 2, indicating that it is a strong electro­phile. In general, the chemical reactivities of com­pounds 16 have been shown to vary with the groups attached to the com­pounds (Abbaz et al., 2018[Abbaz, T., Bendjeddou, A. & Villemin, D. (2018). Arch. Curr. Res. Int. 14, 1-13.]).

3.5. Docking studies

Docking studies of synthesized 16 with human carbonic anhydrase II and IX inhibitors (hCA II and IX; PDB entries: 4iwz and 5fl4) (Biswas et al., 2013[Biswas, S., McKenna, R. & Supuran, C. T. (2013). Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 23, 5646-5649.]; Leitans et al., 2015[Leitans, J., Kazaks, A., Balode, A., Ivanova, J., Zalubovskis, R., Supuran, C. T. & Tars, K. (2015). J. Med. Chem. 58, 9004-9009.]), downloaded from the Research Collaboratory for Structural Bioinformatics (RCSB) Protein Data Bank (PDB) was carried out in Maestro (Version 13.1.137, MMshare Version 5.7.137, Release 2022-1, Platform Windows-x64) (Schrödinger, 2022[Schrödinger (2022). Schrödinger Suite. Release 2022-1. Schrödinger LLC, New York, USA. https://www.schrodinger.com/.]). The binding strengths of the docked com­plexes were analysed through docking score, glide E-model and ligand efficiency (cf. Table 6[link]). These energies define the degree of stability of binding between the respective isoenzymes and target com­pounds 16. N-(5-Sulfamoyl-1,3,4-thia­di­azol-2-yl)-2-(thio­phen-2-yl)acetamide (A) and 5-[1-(naph­tha­len-1-yl)-1,2,3-tri­azol-4-yl]thio­phene-2-sul­fonamide (B) were also docked with respective proteins 4iwz and 5fl4, and taken as reference or standard drugs. Docking poses for the synthesized com­pounds are displayed in Figs. S7–S18, while those for the reference drugs are shown in Figs. 5[link] and 6[link].

Table 6
Energies of o-nitro­sul­fonamides 13 and N-cyclo­amino-o-sul­fan­il­amides 46 with the hCA II (PDB entry 4iwz) and hCA IX (5fl4) isoenzymes

Entry Docking score E-model Ligand efficiency
  4iwz 5fl4 4iwz 5fl4 4iwz 5fl4
1 −1.351 −0.807 −38.102 −40.980 −0.079 −0.047
2 −2.223 −1.977 −41.329 −42.073 −0.124 −0.110
3 −1.288 −1.538 −40.486 −38.954 −0.061 −0.073
4 −1.645 −1.451 −37.113 −35.898 −0.110 −0.097
5 −1.636 −1.605 −41.034 −34.609 −0.102 −0.100
6 −0.784 −1.368 −47.945 −42.454 −0.041 0.072
A −2.252 −55.202 −0.125
B −1.969 −41.029 −0.082
Note: A is N-(5-sulfamoyl-1,3,4-thia­di­azol-2-yl)-2-(thio­phen-2-yl)acetamide and B is 5-[1-(naph­tha­len-1-yl)-1,2,3-tri­azol-4-yl]thio­phene-2-sul­fonamide.
[Figure 5]
Figure 5
(a) 3D inter­action diagram of N-(5-sulfamoyl-1,3,4-thia­di­azol-2-yl)-2-(thio­phen-2-yl)acetamide (A) and hCA II isoenzyme 4iwz (A), and (b) 2D inter­action diagram depicting the binding residues of 4iwz.
[Figure 6]
Figure 6
(a) 3D inter­action diagram of 5-[1-(naph­tha­len-1-yl)-1,2,3-tri­azol-4-yl]thio­phene-2-sul­fonamide (B) and hCA IX isoenzyme 5fl4, and (b) 2D inter­action diagram depicting the binding residues of 5fl4.

Docking calculations between 4iwz and A (reference drug) displayed a docking score of −2.252 kcal mol−1, which is higher than for all synthesized com­pounds 16 (cf. Table 6[link]).

Also, A inter­acted with amino acid residues GLN92 (2.39 Å) and HIE64 (2.24 Å) via hydro­gen-bonding inter­actions and with amino acid residue HIS94 (4.75 Å) via ππ stacking inter­actions (cf. Table 7[link]). Some bad inter­actions/contacts were observed between the amino acid residue GLU106 and A (Fig. 5[link]). Compound 2 displayed the best binding affinity among the synthesized com­pounds, with a docking score of −2.223 kcal mol−1, slightly lower than that of the reference drug. Sulfanilamides 4 and 5 also displayed significantly good binding affinities, with docking scores of −1.645 and −1.636 kcal mol−1, respectively. Sulfanilamide 6 was characterized by the lowest binding affinity, evidenced by its docking score of −0.784 kcal mol−1. Compound 6 displayed glide a E-model energy of −47.945 kcal mol−1 and a ligand efficiency of −0.041 kcal mol−1. Structurally, sul­fan­il­amide 6 inter­acted with the protein 4iwz through hydro­gen bonding with GLN92 (1.88 Å) and TRP5 (2.11 Å), and through ππ stacking with THR199 (1.81 Å) (Fig. S12).

Table 7
Hydrogen-bond and mixed π-inter­actions (Å) of o-nitro­sul­fonamides 13 and N-cyclo­amino-o-sul­fan­il­amides 46 with the hCA II (PDB entry 4iwz) and hCA IX (5fl4) isoenzymes

Isoenzyme/Entry Carbonic anhydrase II (PDB entry 4iwz) Carbonic anhydrase IX (PDB entry 5fl4)
  Hydrogen bond ππ or π–cation Hydrogen bond ππ or π–cation
o-Nitro­sul­fonamides
1 GLN92 (2.13)   GLN92 (2.14) HID94 (4.08) π–cation
2 ASN62 (2.33), ASN67 (2.55)   GLN71 (2.28), THR201 (2.13) HID94 (4.07) π–cation
3 GLN92 (2.25), ASN62 (2.74) TRP5 (5.36) ππ stacking GLN71 (2.26) HID94 (4.05) π–cation
         
N-Cyclo­amino-o-sul­fan­il­amides
4 GLN92 (2.04), THR199 (2.29)   THR201 (2.03)  
5 GLN92 (1.78), THR199 (2.26)      
6 GLN92 (1.88), TRP5 (2.11) THR199 (1.81) ππ stacking GLU92 (2.47)  
A GLN92 (2.39), HIE64 (2.24) HIS94 (4.75) ππ stacking    
B     ASP13 (1.59–2.73), VAL130 (2.53) HID94 (5.49) π–cation
Note: A is N-(5-sulfamoyl-1,3,4-thia­di­azol-2-yl)-2-(thio­phen-2-yl)acetamide and B is 5-[1-(naph­tha­len-1-yl)-1,2,3-tri­azol-4-yl]thio­phene-2-sul­fonamide.

To determine the mode of inter­action of the synthesized com­pounds with human carbonic anhydrase IX inhibitor (hCA IX), the synthesized com­pounds were docked into the active site of 5fl4, and the results obtained were com­pared with the docked results of the reference drug B. We observed that the reference drug inter­acts with amino acid residues ASP13 (1.59–2.73 Å) and VAL130 (2.53 Å) via hydro­gen bonding, and with HID94 (5.49 Å) via π–cation inter­actions (cf. Table 7[link]). Furthermore, B exhibited a docking score of −1.969 kcal mol−1, a glide E-model energy of −41.029 kcal mol−1 and a ligand efficiency of −0.082 kcal mol−1, and is surrounded by several amino acid residues. Some of the residues are TRP9, PRO203, THR201, HID68, LEU199, HID94, GLN92, VAL171 and ZN264, with bad contacts or inter­actions observed on residue ASP131 (Fig. 6[link]). Benzene­sul­fonamide 2 presented the highest binding affinity, with a docking score of −1.977 kcal mol−1, higher than the reference drug. All other synthesized com­pounds, except for N-cyclo­amino-o-nitro­benzene­sul­fonamide 1 (docking score = −0.807), displayed significantly good docking scores; however, they were lower than the reference drug (cf. Table 6[link]). Com­pound 3 displayed hydro­gen-bond inter­actions with amino acid residue GLN71, with a bond length of 2.26 Å, and a π–cation inter­action with amino acid residue HID94, with a bond length of 4.05 Å (Fig. S15).

We observed that the docking scores of 2 with 4iwz and 5fl4 are close to those obtained for A with 4iwz and B with 5fl4. Docking scores of mol­ecules with ring structures 1 and 36 (in the range > −1.67 kcal mol−1) also correlated with the electronegativity and electrophilicity values presented in Table 5[link]. This is informed by the HOMO and LUMO properties (Kumar et al., 2018[Kumar, S., Saini, V., Maurya, I. K., Sindhu, J., Kumari, M., Kataria, R. & Kumar, V. (2018). PLoS One, 13, e0196016.]).

4. Conclusion

o-Nitro­sul­fonamides 13 and N-cyclo­amino-o-sul­fan­il­amides 46 have been successfully synthesized, characterized and the intermolecular interactions analysed, as well as being tested in silico for carbonic anhydrase II (4iwz) and IX (5fl4) inhibitory activities. The results obtained from crystal packing and DFT analysis suggests that the mol­ecules are held together by forces such as hydro­gen bonding and ππ inter­actions. The results of the DFT study of com­pounds 16 were correlated with the mol­ecular docking data and indicate that electronegativity and electrophilicity of the title com­pounds play an important role in their inter­action with carbonic anhydrase II (4iwz) and IX (5fl4).

O-Nitro­sul­fonamide 2 displayed a good docking score against 4iwz (lower than the reference drug) and the best against 5fl4 (higher than the reference drug). These results provided a valuable synthesis approach and structural and docking information for com­pounds 16 that may be used for the development of potent anti­bacterial drugs.

Supporting information


Computing details top

For all structures, data collection: APEX2 (Bruker, 2011); cell refinement: APEX2 (Bruker, 2011); data reduction: SAINT (Bruker, 2012); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXT2018 (Sheldrick, 2015a); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL2018 (Sheldrick, 2015b) and ShelXle (Hübschle et al., 2011); molecular graphics: ORTEP-3 for Windows (Farrugia, 2012); software used to prepare material for publication: PLATON (Spek, 2020) and Mercury (Macrae et al., 2020).

1-[(2-Nitrophenyl)sulfonyl]pyrrolidine (ka097) top
Crystal data top
C10H12N2O4SF(000) = 536
Mr = 256.28Dx = 1.493 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/nMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
a = 8.6173 (5) ÅCell parameters from 9888 reflections
b = 14.6662 (9) Åθ = 2.7–28.3°
c = 9.4885 (6) ŵ = 0.29 mm1
β = 108.075 (3)°T = 200 K
V = 1140.01 (12) Å3Block, yellow
Z = 40.67 × 0.67 × 0.12 mm
Data collection top
Bruker APEXII CCD
diffractometer
2849 independent reflections
Radiation source: sealed tube2508 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromatorRint = 0.018
Detector resolution: 8.3333 pixels mm-1θmax = 28.4°, θmin = 2.7°
φ and ω scansh = 1111
Absorption correction: numerical
(SADABS; Bruker, 2008)
k = 1719
Tmin = 0.934, Tmax = 1.000l = 1212
24329 measured reflections
Refinement top
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: dual
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.041Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.111H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.05 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0517P)2 + 0.7926P]
where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
2849 reflections(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
149 parametersΔρmax = 0.43 e Å3
20 restraintsΔρmin = 0.47 e Å3
Special details top

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.

Refinement. Carbon-bound H atoms were placed in calculated positions and were included in the refinement in the riding model approximation, with Uiso(H) set to 1.2 Ueq(C).

The pyrrolidine group is disordered necessitating the use of the restraints SADI, EADP and SAME.

Single-crystal X-ray diffraction (SC-XRD) data were collected at 200 or 296 K on a Bruker APEXII CCD diffractometer with graphite-monochromated Mo Kα radiation using the APEX2 data collection software and SAINT (Bruker 2012) for cell refinement and data reduction. The structures were solved by dual-space methods applying SHELXT2018 (Sheldrick, 2015a) and refined by least-squares procedures using SHELXL2018 (Sheldrick, 2015b). Data were corrected for absorption effects using the numerical method implemented in SADABS (Bruker 2012). All non-H atoms were refined anisotropically. The crystal structure diagrams were drawn with ORTEP-3 for Windows (Farrugia 2012).

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/UeqOcc. (<1)
S10.49089 (5)0.66797 (3)0.32216 (4)0.02954 (13)
O10.52737 (15)0.62543 (9)0.46416 (13)0.0360 (3)
O20.41164 (17)0.75483 (10)0.29726 (18)0.0481 (4)
O30.91161 (16)0.56570 (9)0.57998 (13)0.0374 (3)
O40.74333 (16)0.49165 (8)0.40041 (15)0.0387 (3)
N10.3849 (2)0.59886 (12)0.20100 (17)0.0424 (4)
N20.82322 (16)0.55892 (9)0.45200 (15)0.0261 (3)
C210.67960 (18)0.68563 (10)0.28603 (17)0.0243 (3)
C220.82125 (18)0.63575 (9)0.35184 (16)0.0233 (3)
C230.9678 (2)0.65569 (11)0.32834 (19)0.0300 (3)
H231.0630070.6213520.3764730.036*
C240.9742 (2)0.72656 (12)0.2335 (2)0.0347 (4)
H241.0737350.7403560.2147230.042*
C250.8355 (2)0.77707 (12)0.1663 (2)0.0348 (4)
H250.8399130.8253470.1008420.042*
C260.6899 (2)0.75768 (11)0.19374 (18)0.0304 (3)
H260.5961790.7939660.1490890.036*
C110.3771 (10)0.4994 (5)0.2187 (8)0.0525 (5)0.579 (7)
H11A0.3656970.4834330.3163630.063*0.579 (7)
H11B0.4754190.4691080.2077840.063*0.579 (7)
C120.2269 (6)0.4739 (3)0.0945 (5)0.0525 (5)0.579 (7)
H12A0.1261670.4907430.1175920.063*0.579 (7)
H12B0.2246190.4078280.0724380.063*0.579 (7)
C130.2474 (6)0.5302 (4)0.0321 (5)0.0525 (5)0.579 (7)
H13A0.1427200.5365360.1127500.063*0.579 (7)
H13B0.3296940.5029200.0726150.063*0.579 (7)
C140.3052 (11)0.6216 (4)0.0416 (7)0.0525 (5)0.579 (7)
H14A0.3840500.6504750.0015150.063*0.579 (7)
H14B0.2119940.6635090.0297010.063*0.579 (7)
C150.3620 (14)0.5024 (7)0.2240 (11)0.0525 (5)0.421 (7)
H15A0.2896520.4927820.2858200.063*0.421 (7)
H15B0.4674840.4712630.2702930.063*0.421 (7)
C160.2804 (9)0.4696 (4)0.0620 (7)0.0525 (5)0.421 (7)
H16A0.3620380.4414740.0214280.063*0.421 (7)
H16B0.1934590.4244910.0572380.063*0.421 (7)
C170.2083 (8)0.5567 (5)0.0247 (7)0.0525 (5)0.421 (7)
H17A0.2074840.5515590.1289980.063*0.421 (7)
H17B0.0947590.5660450.0239700.063*0.421 (7)
C180.3140 (15)0.6354 (6)0.0501 (10)0.0525 (5)0.421 (7)
H18A0.3993570.6490690.0033200.063*0.421 (7)
H18B0.2486450.6910030.0495880.063*0.421 (7)
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top
U11U22U33U12U13U23
S10.0263 (2)0.0333 (2)0.0318 (2)0.00668 (14)0.01314 (16)0.00676 (15)
O10.0363 (6)0.0479 (7)0.0283 (6)0.0048 (5)0.0166 (5)0.0052 (5)
O20.0392 (7)0.0428 (7)0.0700 (10)0.0185 (6)0.0280 (7)0.0142 (7)
O30.0405 (7)0.0391 (7)0.0282 (6)0.0012 (5)0.0045 (5)0.0077 (5)
O40.0373 (7)0.0259 (6)0.0495 (8)0.0061 (5)0.0087 (6)0.0034 (5)
N10.0400 (8)0.0479 (9)0.0327 (8)0.0083 (7)0.0017 (6)0.0123 (7)
N20.0242 (6)0.0237 (6)0.0306 (7)0.0030 (5)0.0090 (5)0.0045 (5)
C210.0261 (7)0.0239 (7)0.0246 (7)0.0026 (5)0.0103 (6)0.0011 (5)
C220.0276 (7)0.0195 (6)0.0231 (7)0.0016 (5)0.0081 (6)0.0009 (5)
C230.0270 (8)0.0281 (7)0.0363 (9)0.0030 (6)0.0116 (7)0.0023 (6)
C240.0350 (8)0.0329 (8)0.0428 (9)0.0009 (7)0.0218 (7)0.0038 (7)
C250.0446 (10)0.0287 (8)0.0375 (9)0.0036 (7)0.0222 (8)0.0087 (7)
C260.0351 (8)0.0272 (7)0.0305 (8)0.0080 (6)0.0125 (7)0.0075 (6)
C110.0476 (9)0.0604 (10)0.0421 (7)0.0101 (7)0.0034 (6)0.0040 (7)
C120.0476 (9)0.0604 (10)0.0421 (7)0.0101 (7)0.0034 (6)0.0040 (7)
C130.0476 (9)0.0604 (10)0.0421 (7)0.0101 (7)0.0034 (6)0.0040 (7)
C140.0476 (9)0.0604 (10)0.0421 (7)0.0101 (7)0.0034 (6)0.0040 (7)
C150.0476 (9)0.0604 (10)0.0421 (7)0.0101 (7)0.0034 (6)0.0040 (7)
C160.0476 (9)0.0604 (10)0.0421 (7)0.0101 (7)0.0034 (6)0.0040 (7)
C170.0476 (9)0.0604 (10)0.0421 (7)0.0101 (7)0.0034 (6)0.0040 (7)
C180.0476 (9)0.0604 (10)0.0421 (7)0.0101 (7)0.0034 (6)0.0040 (7)
Geometric parameters (Å, º) top
S1—O11.4285 (12)C11—H11A0.9900
S1—O21.4300 (13)C11—H11B0.9900
S1—N11.5913 (17)C12—C131.513 (6)
S1—C211.7818 (15)C12—H12A0.9900
O3—N21.2209 (18)C12—H12B0.9900
O4—N21.2157 (18)C13—C141.522 (6)
N1—C151.454 (10)C13—H13A0.9900
N1—C111.472 (8)C13—H13B0.9900
N1—C181.472 (8)C14—H14A0.9900
N1—C141.492 (6)C14—H14B0.9900
N2—C221.4706 (18)C15—C161.555 (10)
C21—C261.393 (2)C15—H15A0.9900
C21—C221.394 (2)C15—H15B0.9900
C22—C231.380 (2)C16—C171.543 (8)
C23—C241.387 (2)C16—H16A0.9900
C23—H230.9500C16—H16B0.9900
C24—C251.382 (2)C17—C181.505 (8)
C24—H240.9500C17—H17A0.9900
C25—C261.388 (2)C17—H17B0.9900
C25—H250.9500C18—H18A0.9900
C26—H260.9500C18—H18B0.9900
C11—C121.503 (8)
O1—S1—O2119.93 (9)C13—C12—H12A111.4
O1—S1—N1108.19 (8)C11—C12—H12B111.4
O2—S1—N1108.08 (9)C13—C12—H12B111.4
O1—S1—C21107.34 (7)H12A—C12—H12B109.3
O2—S1—C21104.85 (8)C12—C13—C14102.6 (4)
N1—S1—C21107.90 (8)C12—C13—H13A111.2
C15—N1—C18117.8 (5)C14—C13—H13A111.2
C11—N1—C14108.3 (4)C12—C13—H13B111.2
C15—N1—S1125.8 (4)C14—C13—H13B111.2
C11—N1—S1125.8 (3)H13A—C13—H13B109.2
C18—N1—S1116.2 (3)N1—C14—C13104.5 (4)
C14—N1—S1124.8 (2)N1—C14—H14A110.8
O4—N2—O3124.55 (14)C13—C14—H14A110.8
O4—N2—C22118.04 (13)N1—C14—H14B110.8
O3—N2—C22117.32 (13)C13—C14—H14B110.8
C26—C21—C22117.54 (14)H14A—C14—H14B108.9
C26—C21—S1118.12 (12)N1—C15—C16101.2 (6)
C22—C21—S1124.21 (11)N1—C15—H15A111.5
C23—C22—C21122.31 (14)C16—C15—H15A111.5
C23—C22—N2116.04 (13)N1—C15—H15B111.5
C21—C22—N2121.64 (13)C16—C15—H15B111.5
C22—C23—C24119.09 (15)H15A—C15—H15B109.4
C22—C23—H23120.5C17—C16—C15104.7 (6)
C24—C23—H23120.5C17—C16—H16A110.8
C25—C24—C23119.87 (15)C15—C16—H16A110.8
C25—C24—H24120.1C17—C16—H16B110.8
C23—C24—H24120.1C15—C16—H16B110.8
C24—C25—C26120.41 (15)H16A—C16—H16B108.9
C24—C25—H25119.8C18—C17—C16107.4 (6)
C26—C25—H25119.8C18—C17—H17A110.2
C25—C26—C21120.75 (15)C16—C17—H17A110.2
C25—C26—H26119.6C18—C17—H17B110.2
C21—C26—H26119.6C16—C17—H17B110.2
N1—C11—C12102.5 (5)H17A—C17—H17B108.5
N1—C11—H11A111.3N1—C18—C17100.8 (5)
C12—C11—H11A111.3N1—C18—H18A111.6
N1—C11—H11B111.3C17—C18—H18A111.6
C12—C11—H11B111.3N1—C18—H18B111.6
H11A—C11—H11B109.2C17—C18—H18B111.6
C11—C12—C13101.6 (5)H18A—C18—H18B109.4
C11—C12—H12A111.4
O1—S1—N1—C1513.5 (6)O4—N2—C22—C2165.74 (19)
O2—S1—N1—C15144.8 (6)O3—N2—C22—C21117.70 (16)
C21—S1—N1—C15102.3 (6)C21—C22—C23—C241.4 (2)
O1—S1—N1—C1121.2 (5)N2—C22—C23—C24179.13 (15)
O2—S1—N1—C11152.5 (5)C22—C23—C24—C251.2 (3)
C21—S1—N1—C1194.6 (5)C23—C24—C25—C260.4 (3)
O1—S1—N1—C18171.1 (7)C24—C25—C26—C211.8 (3)
O2—S1—N1—C1839.8 (7)C22—C21—C26—C251.5 (2)
C21—S1—N1—C1873.1 (7)S1—C21—C26—C25177.41 (13)
O1—S1—N1—C14172.3 (5)C14—N1—C11—C1227.8 (8)
O2—S1—N1—C1441.0 (5)S1—N1—C11—C12163.9 (4)
C21—S1—N1—C1471.9 (5)N1—C11—C12—C1343.3 (8)
O1—S1—C21—C26152.34 (13)C11—C12—C13—C1442.6 (7)
O2—S1—C21—C2623.76 (15)C11—N1—C14—C131.2 (8)
N1—S1—C21—C2691.26 (14)S1—N1—C14—C13169.7 (3)
O1—S1—C21—C2223.24 (15)C12—C13—C14—N125.6 (7)
O2—S1—C21—C22151.82 (14)C18—N1—C15—C166.6 (11)
N1—S1—C21—C2293.15 (15)S1—N1—C15—C16168.8 (4)
C26—C21—C22—C230.1 (2)N1—C15—C16—C1721.2 (10)
S1—C21—C22—C23175.54 (12)C15—C16—C17—C1829.7 (11)
C26—C21—C22—N2179.49 (14)C15—N1—C18—C1711.2 (12)
S1—C21—C22—N23.9 (2)S1—N1—C18—C17173.0 (5)
O4—N2—C22—C23114.81 (16)C16—C17—C18—N124.5 (11)
O3—N2—C22—C2361.75 (19)
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
C11—H11A···O1i0.992.563.398 (7)143
C11—H11B···O40.992.483.093 (8)120
C25—H25···O4ii0.952.543.240 (2)131
C25—H25···O1iii0.952.473.228 (2)137
C26—H26···O20.952.492.860 (2)103
C26—H26···O3iv0.952.563.467 (2)160
Symmetry codes: (i) x+1, y+1, z+1; (ii) x+3/2, y+1/2, z+1/2; (iii) x+1/2, y+3/2, z1/2; (iv) x1/2, y+3/2, z1/2.
1-[(2-Nitrophenyl)sulfonyl]piperidine (ja198) top
Crystal data top
C11H14N2O4SF(000) = 568
Mr = 270.30Dx = 1.459 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/nMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
a = 8.6881 (9) ÅCell parameters from 9983 reflections
b = 15.0266 (14) Åθ = 2.6–28.3°
c = 9.8337 (10) ŵ = 0.27 mm1
β = 106.526 (4)°T = 296 K
V = 1230.8 (2) Å3Block, colourless
Z = 40.48 × 0.47 × 0.45 mm
Data collection top
Bruker APEXII CCD
diffractometer
3059 independent reflections
Radiation source: sealed tube2662 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromatorRint = 0.017
Detector resolution: 8.3333 pixels mm-1θmax = 28.3°, θmin = 2.6°
φ and ω scansh = 1111
Absorption correction: numerical
(SADABS; Bruker, 2008)
k = 2019
Tmin = 0.941, Tmax = 1.000l = 1313
25328 measured reflections
Refinement top
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: dual
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.036Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.106H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.06 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0546P)2 + 0.3577P]
where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
3059 reflections(Δ/σ)max = 0.001
163 parametersΔρmax = 0.32 e Å3
0 restraintsΔρmin = 0.31 e Å3
Special details top

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.

Refinement. Carbon-bound H atoms were placed in calculated positions and were included in the refinement in the riding model approximation, with Uiso(H) set to 1.2 Ueq(C).

Single-crystal X-ray diffraction (SC-XRD) data were collected at 200 or 296 K on a Bruker APEXII CCD diffractometer with graphite-monochromated Mo Kα radiation using the APEX2 data collection software and SAINT (Bruker 2012) for cell refinement and data reduction. The structures were solved by dual-space methods applying SHELXT2018 (Sheldrick, 2015a) and refined by least-squares procedures using SHELXL2018 (Sheldrick, 2015b). Data were corrected for absorption effects using the numerical method implemented in SADABS (Bruker 2012). All non-H atoms were refined anisotropically. The crystal structure diagrams were drawn with ORTEP-3 for Windows (Farrugia 2012).

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/Ueq
S10.50241 (4)0.66804 (2)0.66863 (4)0.04006 (12)
O10.57946 (15)0.75271 (8)0.69071 (16)0.0609 (3)
O20.46987 (14)0.62642 (8)0.53305 (11)0.0521 (3)
O30.23990 (17)0.49620 (9)0.58739 (17)0.0705 (4)
O40.08960 (18)0.57419 (11)0.41946 (13)0.0734 (4)
N10.61016 (14)0.60117 (8)0.78644 (13)0.0416 (3)
N20.17049 (15)0.56417 (9)0.54124 (14)0.0463 (3)
C110.5872 (2)0.50422 (11)0.76898 (19)0.0517 (4)
H11A0.5644410.4885690.6695280.062*
H11B0.4967450.4858030.8016830.062*
C120.7374 (2)0.45729 (13)0.8536 (2)0.0627 (5)
H12A0.7206290.3934570.8457620.075*
H12B0.8252130.4718530.8148350.075*
C130.7814 (2)0.48376 (14)1.0071 (2)0.0606 (5)
H13A0.8812210.4550021.0577120.073*
H13B0.6984810.4638661.0484630.073*
C140.8004 (2)0.58345 (15)1.0233 (2)0.0662 (5)
H14A0.8195860.5992221.1223960.079*
H14B0.8928310.6021830.9938570.079*
C150.6533 (2)0.63160 (13)0.93604 (18)0.0582 (4)
H15A0.5643680.6205320.9750630.070*
H15B0.6737480.6951430.9399300.070*
C210.31422 (16)0.68463 (9)0.70518 (14)0.0357 (3)
C220.17424 (16)0.63776 (9)0.64082 (14)0.0372 (3)
C230.02972 (18)0.65753 (11)0.66598 (17)0.0468 (3)
H230.0626240.6262200.6196090.056*
C240.0237 (2)0.72436 (12)0.76084 (19)0.0530 (4)
H240.0726220.7374060.7801840.064*
C250.1604 (2)0.77165 (12)0.82675 (18)0.0529 (4)
H250.1561780.8166240.8905480.063*
C260.30433 (19)0.75250 (10)0.79841 (16)0.0449 (3)
H260.3954710.7854980.8423460.054*
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top
U11U22U33U12U13U23
S10.03940 (19)0.0373 (2)0.0487 (2)0.00205 (13)0.02106 (15)0.00020 (13)
O10.0540 (7)0.0420 (6)0.0951 (10)0.0107 (5)0.0347 (6)0.0018 (6)
O20.0559 (6)0.0647 (7)0.0425 (6)0.0024 (5)0.0248 (5)0.0001 (5)
O30.0696 (8)0.0434 (7)0.0929 (10)0.0075 (6)0.0143 (7)0.0118 (7)
O40.0767 (9)0.0890 (10)0.0474 (7)0.0056 (8)0.0066 (6)0.0153 (7)
N10.0405 (6)0.0379 (6)0.0457 (6)0.0027 (5)0.0110 (5)0.0090 (5)
N20.0405 (6)0.0466 (7)0.0525 (7)0.0037 (5)0.0141 (5)0.0078 (6)
C110.0540 (9)0.0402 (8)0.0565 (9)0.0011 (7)0.0089 (7)0.0080 (7)
C120.0674 (11)0.0466 (9)0.0712 (11)0.0155 (8)0.0150 (9)0.0021 (8)
C130.0515 (9)0.0706 (12)0.0588 (10)0.0106 (8)0.0142 (8)0.0126 (9)
C140.0570 (10)0.0777 (13)0.0555 (10)0.0069 (9)0.0024 (8)0.0120 (9)
C150.0583 (9)0.0592 (10)0.0521 (9)0.0086 (8)0.0074 (7)0.0185 (8)
C210.0383 (6)0.0327 (6)0.0390 (6)0.0012 (5)0.0157 (5)0.0032 (5)
C220.0403 (7)0.0344 (6)0.0381 (6)0.0015 (5)0.0128 (5)0.0032 (5)
C230.0386 (7)0.0481 (8)0.0551 (9)0.0006 (6)0.0155 (6)0.0046 (7)
C240.0493 (8)0.0539 (9)0.0645 (10)0.0104 (7)0.0302 (7)0.0049 (8)
C250.0634 (10)0.0457 (8)0.0580 (9)0.0072 (7)0.0307 (8)0.0055 (7)
C260.0491 (8)0.0386 (7)0.0496 (8)0.0008 (6)0.0184 (6)0.0045 (6)
Geometric parameters (Å, º) top
S1—O11.4252 (12)C13—H13B0.9700
S1—O21.4263 (12)C14—C151.506 (3)
S1—N11.6160 (13)C14—H14A0.9700
S1—C211.7885 (14)C14—H14B0.9700
O3—N21.2070 (19)C15—H15A0.9700
O4—N21.2132 (18)C15—H15B0.9700
N1—C111.474 (2)C21—C261.390 (2)
N1—C151.4833 (19)C21—C221.3921 (19)
N2—C221.4713 (19)C22—C231.379 (2)
C11—C121.508 (2)C23—C241.382 (2)
C11—H11A0.9700C23—H230.9300
C11—H11B0.9700C24—C251.378 (3)
C12—C131.501 (3)C24—H240.9300
C12—H12A0.9700C25—C261.386 (2)
C12—H12B0.9700C25—H250.9300
C13—C141.511 (3)C26—H260.9300
C13—H13A0.9700
O1—S1—O2119.57 (8)C15—C14—C13111.53 (16)
O1—S1—N1107.14 (7)C15—C14—H14A109.3
O2—S1—N1108.53 (7)C13—C14—H14A109.3
O1—S1—C21105.16 (7)C15—C14—H14B109.3
O2—S1—C21107.43 (7)C13—C14—H14B109.3
N1—S1—C21108.59 (6)H14A—C14—H14B108.0
C11—N1—C15114.07 (14)N1—C15—C14110.56 (14)
C11—N1—S1119.97 (10)N1—C15—H15A109.5
C15—N1—S1116.79 (10)C14—C15—H15A109.5
O3—N2—O4124.29 (15)N1—C15—H15B109.5
O3—N2—C22118.14 (13)C14—C15—H15B109.5
O4—N2—C22117.42 (14)H15A—C15—H15B108.1
N1—C11—C12109.30 (14)C26—C21—C22117.46 (13)
N1—C11—H11A109.8C26—C21—S1117.79 (11)
C12—C11—H11A109.8C22—C21—S1124.65 (11)
N1—C11—H11B109.8C23—C22—C21122.11 (13)
C12—C11—H11B109.8C23—C22—N2115.62 (13)
H11A—C11—H11B108.3C21—C22—N2122.27 (12)
C13—C12—C11111.34 (15)C22—C23—C24119.28 (15)
C13—C12—H12A109.4C22—C23—H23120.4
C11—C12—H12A109.4C24—C23—H23120.4
C13—C12—H12B109.4C25—C24—C23119.93 (14)
C11—C12—H12B109.4C25—C24—H24120.0
H12A—C12—H12B108.0C23—C24—H24120.0
C12—C13—C14110.97 (16)C24—C25—C26120.31 (15)
C12—C13—H13A109.4C24—C25—H25119.8
C14—C13—H13A109.4C26—C25—H25119.8
C12—C13—H13B109.4C25—C26—C21120.88 (15)
C14—C13—H13B109.4C25—C26—H26119.6
H13A—C13—H13B108.0C21—C26—H26119.6
O1—S1—N1—C11163.84 (12)O2—S1—C21—C2221.08 (14)
O2—S1—N1—C1133.45 (14)N1—S1—C21—C2296.11 (13)
C21—S1—N1—C1183.04 (13)C26—C21—C22—C230.7 (2)
O1—S1—N1—C1551.20 (14)S1—C21—C22—C23175.47 (11)
O2—S1—N1—C15178.40 (12)C26—C21—C22—N2179.50 (13)
C21—S1—N1—C1561.91 (13)S1—C21—C22—N24.32 (19)
C15—N1—C11—C1256.72 (19)O3—N2—C22—C23111.68 (16)
S1—N1—C11—C12157.43 (13)O4—N2—C22—C2364.06 (19)
N1—C11—C12—C1356.4 (2)O3—N2—C22—C2168.51 (19)
C11—C12—C13—C1456.2 (2)O4—N2—C22—C21115.74 (16)
C12—C13—C14—C1554.1 (2)C21—C22—C23—C241.7 (2)
C11—N1—C15—C1455.3 (2)N2—C22—C23—C24178.45 (14)
S1—N1—C15—C14157.73 (14)C22—C23—C24—C251.4 (2)
C13—C14—C15—N152.6 (2)C23—C24—C25—C260.0 (3)
O1—S1—C21—C2626.70 (14)C24—C25—C26—C211.0 (3)
O2—S1—C21—C26155.08 (12)C22—C21—C26—C250.7 (2)
N1—S1—C21—C2687.72 (12)S1—C21—C26—C25177.14 (12)
O1—S1—C21—C22149.47 (12)
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
C11—H11A···O20.972.482.907 (2)107
C11—H11A···O2i0.972.593.476 (2)152
C15—H15B···O10.972.512.943 (2)107
C25—H25···O2ii0.932.573.3337 (19)140
C26—H26···O10.932.532.877 (2)103
Symmetry codes: (i) x+1, y+1, z+1; (ii) x1/2, y+3/2, z+1/2.
1-[(2-Nitrophenyl)sulfonyl]-2,3-dihydro-1H-indole (ja250) top
Crystal data top
C14H12N2O4SF(000) = 632
Mr = 304.32Dx = 1.459 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/nMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
a = 7.4701 (5) ÅCell parameters from 9952 reflections
b = 23.6743 (12) Åθ = 2.7–27.1°
c = 7.8614 (5) ŵ = 0.25 mm1
β = 94.989 (3)°T = 296 K
V = 1385.02 (15) Å3Block, yellow
Z = 40.62 × 0.51 × 0.43 mm
Data collection top
Bruker APEXII CCD
diffractometer
3434 independent reflections
Radiation source: sealed tube2864 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromatorRint = 0.024
Detector resolution: 8.3333 pixels mm-1θmax = 28.4°, θmin = 2.7°
φ and ω scansh = 99
Absorption correction: numerical
(SADABS; Bruker, 2008)
k = 3128
Tmin = 0.913, Tmax = 1.000l = 1010
28400 measured reflections
Refinement top
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: dual
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.040Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.105H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.05 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0453P)2 + 0.5135P]
where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
3434 reflections(Δ/σ)max = 0.002
190 parametersΔρmax = 0.26 e Å3
0 restraintsΔρmin = 0.29 e Å3
Special details top

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.

Refinement. Carbon-bound H atoms were placed in calculated positions and were included in the refinement in the riding model approximation, with Uiso(H) set to 1.2 Ueq(C).

Single-crystal X-ray diffraction (SC-XRD) data were collected at 200 or 296 K on a Bruker APEXII CCD diffractometer with graphite-monochromated Mo Kα radiation using the APEX2 data collection software and SAINT (Bruker 2012) for cell refinement and data reduction. The structures were solved by dual-space methods applying SHELXT2018 (Sheldrick, 2015a) and refined by least-squares procedures using SHELXL2018 (Sheldrick, 2015b). Data were corrected for absorption effects using the numerical method implemented in SADABS (Bruker 2012). All non-H atoms were refined anisotropically. The crystal structure diagrams were drawn with ORTEP-3 for Windows (Farrugia 2012).

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/Ueq
S10.79243 (5)0.61702 (2)0.46891 (5)0.03709 (12)
O10.73327 (18)0.65999 (5)0.57767 (16)0.0546 (3)
O20.91672 (16)0.57553 (5)0.53509 (15)0.0487 (3)
O30.9987 (3)0.77311 (7)0.5254 (3)0.1022 (6)
O41.1144 (3)0.69290 (8)0.6043 (2)0.0839 (5)
N10.61681 (17)0.58580 (6)0.38325 (18)0.0418 (3)
N21.0368 (2)0.72407 (8)0.5003 (2)0.0611 (5)
C10.4442 (2)0.61631 (8)0.3457 (3)0.0549 (5)
H1A0.4564250.6460650.2626940.066*
H1B0.4040750.6328100.4487760.066*
C20.3136 (2)0.57142 (9)0.2744 (3)0.0576 (5)
H2A0.2247740.5632940.3540230.069*
H2B0.2521090.5835910.1668700.069*
C110.6039 (2)0.53032 (6)0.31204 (19)0.0368 (3)
C120.4274 (2)0.52060 (8)0.2492 (2)0.0436 (4)
C130.3805 (3)0.46882 (9)0.1789 (2)0.0572 (5)
H130.2622780.4616640.1375480.069*
C140.5100 (3)0.42764 (9)0.1703 (2)0.0611 (5)
H140.4788670.3925250.1236330.073*
C150.6852 (3)0.43842 (8)0.2306 (2)0.0567 (5)
H150.7716270.4105110.2225160.068*
C160.7352 (2)0.48989 (7)0.3029 (2)0.0478 (4)
H160.8535420.4969700.3441030.057*
C210.8884 (2)0.65319 (6)0.30000 (19)0.0365 (3)
C220.9890 (2)0.70184 (7)0.3266 (2)0.0466 (4)
C231.0551 (3)0.73080 (9)0.1950 (3)0.0681 (6)
H231.1202930.7639310.2156310.082*
C241.0234 (3)0.70999 (11)0.0308 (3)0.0726 (6)
H241.0688890.7289410.0596960.087*
C250.9256 (3)0.66178 (10)0.0010 (2)0.0609 (5)
H250.9051190.6479200.1096530.073*
C260.8568 (2)0.63337 (8)0.1351 (2)0.0460 (4)
H260.7888830.6008010.1137580.055*
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top
U11U22U33U12U13U23
S10.0407 (2)0.0361 (2)0.0349 (2)0.00043 (15)0.00584 (15)0.00023 (14)
O10.0670 (8)0.0504 (7)0.0492 (7)0.0017 (6)0.0214 (6)0.0118 (5)
O20.0468 (7)0.0481 (7)0.0493 (7)0.0008 (5)0.0064 (5)0.0089 (5)
O30.1429 (18)0.0630 (10)0.1030 (14)0.0190 (11)0.0239 (12)0.0363 (10)
O40.0995 (13)0.0977 (13)0.0515 (9)0.0136 (10)0.0109 (8)0.0084 (9)
N10.0335 (7)0.0364 (7)0.0555 (8)0.0049 (5)0.0039 (6)0.0012 (6)
N20.0699 (11)0.0578 (10)0.0574 (10)0.0260 (9)0.0151 (8)0.0171 (8)
C10.0417 (9)0.0549 (11)0.0684 (12)0.0155 (8)0.0075 (8)0.0090 (9)
C20.0349 (9)0.0831 (14)0.0548 (11)0.0060 (9)0.0043 (8)0.0050 (10)
C110.0387 (8)0.0370 (8)0.0348 (8)0.0030 (6)0.0032 (6)0.0070 (6)
C120.0381 (8)0.0584 (10)0.0347 (8)0.0066 (7)0.0054 (6)0.0078 (7)
C130.0530 (11)0.0703 (13)0.0478 (10)0.0229 (10)0.0017 (8)0.0001 (9)
C140.0835 (15)0.0499 (11)0.0495 (11)0.0217 (10)0.0023 (10)0.0015 (8)
C150.0749 (13)0.0394 (9)0.0548 (11)0.0063 (9)0.0001 (9)0.0024 (8)
C160.0457 (9)0.0415 (9)0.0547 (10)0.0042 (7)0.0045 (8)0.0018 (7)
C210.0382 (8)0.0369 (7)0.0349 (7)0.0017 (6)0.0052 (6)0.0008 (6)
C220.0528 (10)0.0438 (9)0.0437 (9)0.0075 (7)0.0071 (7)0.0018 (7)
C230.0842 (15)0.0601 (12)0.0616 (13)0.0261 (11)0.0150 (11)0.0068 (10)
C240.0845 (16)0.0843 (15)0.0509 (12)0.0173 (13)0.0167 (11)0.0202 (11)
C250.0674 (13)0.0810 (14)0.0344 (9)0.0051 (11)0.0056 (8)0.0028 (9)
C260.0474 (9)0.0527 (10)0.0376 (8)0.0043 (7)0.0022 (7)0.0025 (7)
Geometric parameters (Å, º) top
S1—O21.4190 (12)C13—C141.379 (3)
S1—O11.4236 (12)C13—H130.9300
S1—N11.6022 (14)C14—C151.376 (3)
S1—C211.7822 (15)C14—H140.9300
O3—N21.216 (2)C15—C161.382 (3)
O4—N21.211 (2)C15—H150.9300
N1—C111.428 (2)C16—H160.9300
N1—C11.485 (2)C21—C261.380 (2)
N2—C221.478 (2)C21—C221.381 (2)
C1—C21.517 (3)C22—C231.369 (3)
C1—H1A0.9700C23—C241.382 (3)
C1—H1B0.9700C23—H230.9300
C2—C121.497 (3)C24—C251.364 (3)
C2—H2A0.9700C24—H240.9300
C2—H2B0.9700C25—C261.387 (2)
C11—C161.377 (2)C25—H250.9300
C11—C121.386 (2)C26—H260.9300
C12—C131.377 (3)
O2—S1—O1120.12 (8)C12—C13—C14119.61 (18)
O2—S1—N1108.69 (7)C12—C13—H13120.2
O1—S1—N1107.25 (8)C14—C13—H13120.2
O2—S1—C21108.23 (7)C15—C14—C13120.12 (18)
O1—S1—C21105.68 (7)C15—C14—H14119.9
N1—S1—C21106.04 (7)C13—C14—H14119.9
C11—N1—C1109.96 (13)C14—C15—C16121.33 (19)
C11—N1—S1127.90 (11)C14—C15—H15119.3
C1—N1—S1121.62 (12)C16—C15—H15119.3
O4—N2—O3125.30 (19)C11—C16—C15117.77 (17)
O4—N2—C22118.03 (17)C11—C16—H16121.1
O3—N2—C22116.6 (2)C15—C16—H16121.1
N1—C1—C2104.61 (14)C26—C21—C22118.20 (15)
N1—C1—H1A110.8C26—C21—S1119.31 (12)
C2—C1—H1A110.8C22—C21—S1122.45 (12)
N1—C1—H1B110.8C23—C22—C21122.03 (17)
C2—C1—H1B110.8C23—C22—N2116.49 (16)
H1A—C1—H1B108.9C21—C22—N2121.44 (15)
C12—C2—C1104.93 (14)C22—C23—C24118.92 (19)
C12—C2—H2A110.8C22—C23—H23120.5
C1—C2—H2A110.8C24—C23—H23120.5
C12—C2—H2B110.8C25—C24—C23120.27 (19)
C1—C2—H2B110.8C25—C24—H24119.9
H2A—C2—H2B108.8C23—C24—H24119.9
C16—C11—C12121.72 (16)C24—C25—C26120.26 (18)
C16—C11—N1129.46 (15)C24—C25—H25119.9
C12—C11—N1108.81 (14)C26—C25—H25119.9
C13—C12—C11119.44 (17)C21—C26—C25120.31 (17)
C13—C12—C2129.88 (17)C21—C26—H26119.8
C11—C12—C2110.67 (15)C25—C26—H26119.8
O2—S1—N1—C1126.31 (16)N1—C11—C16—C15178.24 (16)
O1—S1—N1—C11157.59 (13)C14—C15—C16—C110.3 (3)
C21—S1—N1—C1189.85 (14)O2—S1—C21—C2690.65 (14)
O2—S1—N1—C1162.82 (14)O1—S1—C21—C26139.48 (14)
O1—S1—N1—C131.54 (16)N1—S1—C21—C2625.83 (15)
C21—S1—N1—C181.01 (15)O2—S1—C21—C2291.72 (15)
C11—N1—C1—C210.22 (19)O1—S1—C21—C2238.16 (16)
S1—N1—C1—C2177.44 (12)N1—S1—C21—C22151.80 (14)
N1—C1—C2—C129.09 (19)C26—C21—C22—C230.8 (3)
C1—N1—C11—C16173.54 (17)S1—C21—C22—C23176.87 (17)
S1—N1—C11—C161.8 (3)C26—C21—C22—N2176.72 (17)
C1—N1—C11—C127.25 (18)S1—C21—C22—N25.6 (2)
S1—N1—C11—C12178.98 (12)O4—N2—C22—C23122.4 (2)
C16—C11—C12—C131.4 (2)O3—N2—C22—C2355.7 (3)
N1—C11—C12—C13177.85 (15)O4—N2—C22—C2155.3 (3)
C16—C11—C12—C2179.67 (16)O3—N2—C22—C21126.6 (2)
N1—C11—C12—C21.05 (18)C21—C22—C23—C241.4 (3)
C1—C2—C12—C13175.99 (18)N2—C22—C23—C24176.2 (2)
C1—C2—C12—C115.3 (2)C22—C23—C24—C250.9 (4)
C11—C12—C13—C140.8 (3)C23—C24—C25—C260.2 (4)
C2—C12—C13—C14179.42 (18)C22—C21—C26—C250.3 (3)
C12—C13—C14—C150.4 (3)S1—C21—C26—C25178.08 (14)
C13—C14—C15—C161.0 (3)C24—C25—C26—C210.8 (3)
C12—C11—C16—C150.9 (3)
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
C16—H16···O20.932.412.975 (2)119
C16—H16···O2i0.932.553.195 (2)127
C23—H23···O1ii0.932.303.085 (2)142
C26—H26···N10.932.602.982 (2)106
Symmetry codes: (i) x+2, y+1, z+1; (ii) x+1/2, y+3/2, z1/2.
2-(Pyrrolidine-1-sulfonyl)aniline (ja192) top
Crystal data top
C10H14N2O2SF(000) = 960
Mr = 226.29Dx = 1.373 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/cMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
a = 16.399 (3) ÅCell parameters from 9858 reflections
b = 7.9485 (12) Åθ = 2.3–28.3°
c = 18.376 (3) ŵ = 0.28 mm1
β = 113.907 (6)°T = 296 K
V = 2189.7 (6) Å3Block, colourless
Z = 80.47 × 0.32 × 0.20 mm
Data collection top
Bruker APEXII CCD
diffractometer
5477 independent reflections
Radiation source: sealed tube4489 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromatorRint = 0.032
Detector resolution: 8.3333 pixels mm-1θmax = 28.4°, θmin = 2.3°
φ and ω scansh = 2121
Absorption correction: numerical
(SADABS; Bruker, 2008)
k = 1010
Tmin = 0.927, Tmax = 1.000l = 2424
55955 measured reflections
Refinement top
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: dual
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.035Hydrogen site location: mixed
wR(F2) = 0.107H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
S = 1.04 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0553P)2 + 0.5724P]
where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
5477 reflections(Δ/σ)max = 0.001
287 parametersΔρmax = 0.33 e Å3
0 restraintsΔρmin = 0.36 e Å3
Special details top

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.

Refinement. Carbon-bound H atoms were placed in calculated positions and were included in the refinement in the riding model approximation, with Uiso(H) set to 1.2 Ueq(C).

The nitrogen-bound H atoms were located on a difference map and refined freely.

A reflection with large difference between its observed and calculated intensities was omitted. This is due to obstruction by the beam stop.

Single-crystal X-ray diffraction (SC-XRD) data were collected at 200 or 296 K on a Bruker APEXII CCD diffractometer with graphite-monochromated Mo Kα radiation using the APEX2 data collection software and SAINT (Bruker 2012) for cell refinement and data reduction. The structures were solved by dual-space methods applying SHELXT2018 (Sheldrick, 2015a) and refined by least-squares procedures using SHELXL2018 (Sheldrick, 2015b). Data were corrected for absorption effects using the numerical method implemented in SADABS (Bruker 2012). All non-H atoms were refined anisotropically. The crystal structure diagrams were drawn with ORTEP-3 for Windows (Farrugia 2012).

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/Ueq
S10.60593 (2)0.11220 (4)0.38373 (2)0.03995 (10)
S20.83675 (3)0.54094 (5)0.72672 (2)0.04473 (11)
O110.55812 (7)0.21253 (15)0.41849 (9)0.0639 (3)
O120.59914 (8)0.15372 (16)0.30611 (7)0.0604 (3)
O210.76909 (9)0.41413 (14)0.70735 (7)0.0567 (3)
O220.91886 (9)0.51408 (18)0.79373 (7)0.0691 (4)
N110.56877 (8)0.07718 (15)0.37882 (7)0.0403 (3)
N120.69275 (18)0.1559 (3)0.56795 (13)0.0824 (7)
N210.86112 (9)0.55871 (17)0.65022 (8)0.0461 (3)
N220.63790 (10)0.6609 (2)0.65060 (10)0.0564 (4)
C110.55387 (14)0.1535 (2)0.44477 (11)0.0597 (5)
H11A0.5080030.0943730.4552350.072*
H11B0.6082730.1566050.4929810.072*
C120.52380 (17)0.3286 (2)0.41255 (14)0.0740 (6)
H12A0.5333470.4075030.4555040.089*
H12B0.4610890.3291500.3768740.089*
C130.58061 (14)0.3722 (2)0.36888 (11)0.0592 (4)
H13A0.5499890.4508200.3261150.071*
H13B0.6364760.4220620.4046710.071*
C140.59696 (11)0.2074 (2)0.33613 (9)0.0490 (4)
H14A0.6595460.1947540.3465260.059*
H14B0.5619030.2004420.2791890.059*
C210.79052 (12)0.5923 (3)0.57112 (10)0.0560 (4)
H21A0.7563950.6911830.5722020.067*
H21B0.7503490.4970490.5525700.067*
C220.83964 (15)0.6204 (4)0.51900 (13)0.0842 (7)
H22A0.8307970.5259260.4831670.101*
H22B0.8182670.7216120.4875060.101*
C230.93579 (15)0.6377 (4)0.57256 (15)0.0835 (7)
H23A0.9609420.7365800.5584850.100*
H23B0.9688330.5395580.5684980.100*
C240.94016 (12)0.6543 (3)0.65616 (13)0.0707 (5)
H24A0.9944540.6051660.6951060.085*
H24B0.9362920.7709780.6698740.085*
C1110.71909 (9)0.11558 (16)0.44789 (8)0.0362 (3)
C1120.74894 (11)0.1352 (2)0.53050 (9)0.0492 (4)
C1130.84137 (14)0.1302 (3)0.57508 (11)0.0701 (6)
H1130.8638750.1414550.6301230.084*
C1140.89883 (13)0.1091 (3)0.53914 (14)0.0747 (6)
H1140.9598470.1072370.5703040.090*
C1150.86913 (11)0.0906 (3)0.45820 (13)0.0648 (5)
H1150.9093910.0764050.4347450.078*
C1160.77956 (10)0.0933 (2)0.41274 (10)0.0456 (3)
H1160.7585790.0801950.3578610.055*
C2110.79105 (9)0.73166 (17)0.74078 (8)0.0391 (3)
C2120.69962 (9)0.76850 (18)0.70242 (8)0.0395 (3)
C2130.67185 (11)0.9265 (2)0.71751 (10)0.0475 (3)
H2130.6117090.9544220.6929110.057*
C2140.73005 (12)1.0408 (2)0.76707 (11)0.0556 (4)
H2140.7091371.1442990.7758290.067*
C2150.81985 (13)1.0037 (2)0.80430 (12)0.0638 (5)
H2150.8595901.0817260.8379220.077*
C2160.84970 (11)0.8504 (2)0.79108 (10)0.0549 (4)
H2160.9101320.8250370.8160910.066*
H12C0.7160 (18)0.193 (4)0.6109 (17)0.095 (9)*
H12D0.641 (2)0.190 (4)0.5399 (19)0.113 (12)*
H21C0.5862 (16)0.690 (3)0.6389 (13)0.073 (7)*
H21D0.6538 (13)0.556 (3)0.6567 (12)0.060 (6)*
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top
U11U22U33U12U13U23
S10.02972 (16)0.03424 (17)0.0509 (2)0.00093 (12)0.01122 (14)0.00394 (13)
S20.0512 (2)0.03890 (19)0.03977 (19)0.00835 (15)0.01394 (16)0.00206 (14)
O110.0418 (6)0.0440 (6)0.1067 (10)0.0032 (5)0.0311 (6)0.0126 (6)
O120.0500 (6)0.0649 (7)0.0500 (6)0.0067 (5)0.0034 (5)0.0230 (5)
O210.0805 (8)0.0364 (5)0.0607 (7)0.0048 (5)0.0364 (6)0.0000 (5)
O220.0678 (8)0.0739 (8)0.0485 (7)0.0292 (7)0.0060 (6)0.0050 (6)
N110.0384 (6)0.0377 (6)0.0470 (6)0.0090 (5)0.0196 (5)0.0053 (5)
N120.0955 (16)0.1087 (16)0.0550 (10)0.0348 (14)0.0430 (11)0.0311 (11)
N210.0429 (6)0.0480 (7)0.0467 (7)0.0047 (5)0.0174 (5)0.0002 (5)
N220.0381 (7)0.0600 (9)0.0651 (9)0.0058 (7)0.0148 (7)0.0136 (7)
C110.0825 (12)0.0509 (9)0.0633 (10)0.0215 (9)0.0475 (10)0.0106 (8)
C120.1049 (16)0.0496 (10)0.0838 (14)0.0309 (10)0.0550 (13)0.0085 (9)
C130.0738 (11)0.0421 (8)0.0551 (10)0.0033 (8)0.0192 (9)0.0041 (7)
C140.0550 (9)0.0456 (8)0.0495 (8)0.0087 (7)0.0242 (7)0.0122 (6)
C210.0502 (9)0.0693 (11)0.0465 (9)0.0003 (8)0.0175 (7)0.0075 (8)
C220.0775 (14)0.121 (2)0.0628 (12)0.0000 (13)0.0370 (11)0.0190 (12)
C230.0653 (12)0.1083 (19)0.0937 (16)0.0056 (12)0.0495 (12)0.0194 (14)
C240.0447 (9)0.0847 (14)0.0824 (13)0.0046 (9)0.0255 (9)0.0003 (11)
C1110.0322 (6)0.0331 (6)0.0394 (7)0.0036 (5)0.0105 (5)0.0005 (5)
C1120.0577 (9)0.0442 (8)0.0423 (8)0.0116 (7)0.0168 (7)0.0070 (6)
C1130.0710 (12)0.0640 (11)0.0459 (9)0.0063 (9)0.0066 (9)0.0071 (8)
C1140.0401 (9)0.0711 (13)0.0851 (15)0.0055 (8)0.0035 (9)0.0100 (11)
C1150.0383 (8)0.0682 (11)0.0867 (14)0.0021 (8)0.0240 (9)0.0051 (10)
C1160.0390 (7)0.0473 (8)0.0508 (8)0.0013 (6)0.0185 (6)0.0010 (6)
C2110.0400 (7)0.0362 (7)0.0388 (7)0.0002 (5)0.0138 (6)0.0023 (5)
C2120.0389 (7)0.0420 (7)0.0405 (7)0.0038 (6)0.0190 (6)0.0014 (6)
C2130.0458 (8)0.0462 (8)0.0578 (9)0.0050 (6)0.0286 (7)0.0064 (7)
C2140.0698 (11)0.0390 (8)0.0714 (11)0.0006 (7)0.0425 (9)0.0054 (7)
C2150.0622 (11)0.0522 (9)0.0772 (12)0.0157 (8)0.0285 (10)0.0267 (9)
C2160.0437 (8)0.0553 (9)0.0582 (10)0.0054 (7)0.0129 (7)0.0162 (8)
Geometric parameters (Å, º) top
S1—O121.4236 (13)C21—H21A0.9700
S1—O111.4369 (12)C21—H21B0.9700
S1—N111.6127 (12)C22—C231.489 (3)
S1—C1111.7496 (14)C22—H22A0.9700
S2—O221.4252 (12)C22—H22B0.9700
S2—O211.4330 (13)C23—C241.514 (3)
S2—N211.6161 (14)C23—H23A0.9700
S2—C2111.7558 (14)C23—H23B0.9700
N11—C111.462 (2)C24—H24A0.9700
N11—C141.4813 (19)C24—H24B0.9700
N12—C1121.365 (3)C111—C1161.397 (2)
N12—H12C0.78 (3)C111—C1121.402 (2)
N12—H12D0.84 (3)C112—C1131.401 (3)
N21—C241.468 (2)C113—C1141.363 (3)
N21—C211.470 (2)C113—H1130.9300
N22—C2121.372 (2)C114—C1151.373 (3)
N22—H21C0.82 (2)C114—H1140.9300
N22—H21D0.87 (2)C115—C1161.364 (2)
C11—C121.514 (2)C115—H1150.9300
C11—H11A0.9700C116—H1160.9300
C11—H11B0.9700C211—C2161.396 (2)
C12—C131.496 (3)C211—C2121.405 (2)
C12—H12A0.9700C212—C2131.402 (2)
C12—H12B0.9700C213—C2141.364 (2)
C13—C141.510 (2)C213—H2130.9300
C13—H13A0.9700C214—C2151.381 (3)
C13—H13B0.9700C214—H2140.9300
C14—H14A0.9700C215—C2161.371 (2)
C14—H14B0.9700C215—H2150.9300
C21—C221.497 (3)C216—H2160.9300
O12—S1—O11118.78 (8)C23—C22—C21106.93 (17)
O12—S1—N11106.62 (7)C23—C22—H22A110.3
O11—S1—N11106.32 (7)C21—C22—H22A110.3
O12—S1—C111107.62 (7)C23—C22—H22B110.3
O11—S1—C111108.23 (7)C21—C22—H22B110.3
N11—S1—C111109.00 (6)H22A—C22—H22B108.6
O22—S2—O21118.33 (8)C22—C23—C24106.31 (16)
O22—S2—N21106.53 (8)C22—C23—H23A110.5
O21—S2—N21106.55 (7)C24—C23—H23A110.5
O22—S2—C211108.20 (7)C22—C23—H23B110.5
O21—S2—C211108.07 (7)C24—C23—H23B110.5
N21—S2—C211108.86 (7)H23A—C23—H23B108.7
C11—N11—C14110.00 (13)N21—C24—C23101.67 (16)
C11—N11—S1121.83 (10)N21—C24—H24A111.4
C14—N11—S1119.32 (10)C23—C24—H24A111.4
C112—N12—H12C114 (2)N21—C24—H24B111.4
C112—N12—H12D117 (2)C23—C24—H24B111.4
H12C—N12—H12D117 (3)H24A—C24—H24B109.3
C24—N21—C21107.31 (14)C116—C111—C112120.86 (14)
C24—N21—S2120.18 (12)C116—C111—S1116.38 (11)
C21—N21—S2120.19 (11)C112—C111—S1122.75 (11)
C212—N22—H21C113.7 (16)N12—C112—C113119.99 (18)
C212—N22—H21D114.3 (13)N12—C112—C111123.25 (17)
H21C—N22—H21D122 (2)C113—C112—C111116.75 (16)
N11—C11—C12101.23 (14)C114—C113—C112121.12 (17)
N11—C11—H11A111.5C114—C113—H113119.4
C12—C11—H11A111.5C112—C113—H113119.4
N11—C11—H11B111.5C113—C114—C115121.80 (17)
C12—C11—H11B111.5C113—C114—H114119.1
H11A—C11—H11B109.3C115—C114—H114119.1
C13—C12—C11104.33 (14)C116—C115—C114118.88 (18)
C13—C12—H12A110.9C116—C115—H115120.6
C11—C12—H12A110.9C114—C115—H115120.6
C13—C12—H12B110.9C115—C116—C111120.58 (16)
C11—C12—H12B110.9C115—C116—H116119.7
H12A—C12—H12B108.9C111—C116—H116119.7
C12—C13—C14105.24 (14)C216—C211—C212119.99 (14)
C12—C13—H13A110.7C216—C211—S2117.42 (11)
C14—C13—H13A110.7C212—C211—S2122.57 (11)
C12—C13—H13B110.7N22—C212—C213119.25 (14)
C14—C13—H13B110.7N22—C212—C211123.75 (14)
H13A—C13—H13B108.8C213—C212—C211116.98 (13)
N11—C14—C13104.53 (13)C214—C213—C212122.24 (15)
N11—C14—H14A110.8C214—C213—H213118.9
C13—C14—H14A110.8C212—C213—H213118.9
N11—C14—H14B110.8C213—C214—C215120.37 (15)
C13—C14—H14B110.8C213—C214—H214119.8
H14A—C14—H14B108.9C215—C214—H214119.8
N21—C21—C22104.32 (15)C216—C215—C214119.19 (16)
N21—C21—H21A110.9C216—C215—H215120.4
C22—C21—H21A110.9C214—C215—H215120.4
N21—C21—H21B110.9C215—C216—C211121.23 (16)
C22—C21—H21B110.9C215—C216—H216119.4
H21A—C21—H21B108.9C211—C216—H216119.4
O12—S1—N11—C11171.19 (13)O11—S1—C111—C11229.11 (14)
O11—S1—N11—C1143.54 (15)N11—S1—C111—C11286.12 (13)
C111—S1—N11—C1172.91 (14)C116—C111—C112—N12179.45 (18)
O12—S1—N11—C1444.67 (13)S1—C111—C112—N121.1 (2)
O11—S1—N11—C14172.32 (12)C116—C111—C112—C1130.4 (2)
C111—S1—N11—C1471.23 (13)S1—C111—C112—C113178.01 (13)
O22—S2—N21—C2440.89 (16)N12—C112—C113—C114179.8 (2)
O21—S2—N21—C24168.09 (14)C111—C112—C113—C1140.7 (3)
C211—S2—N21—C2475.59 (15)C112—C113—C114—C1150.5 (3)
O22—S2—N21—C21178.33 (13)C113—C114—C115—C1160.0 (3)
O21—S2—N21—C2154.47 (14)C114—C115—C116—C1110.4 (3)
C211—S2—N21—C2161.86 (14)C112—C111—C116—C1150.2 (2)
C14—N11—C11—C1230.58 (19)S1—C111—C116—C115178.64 (14)
S1—N11—C11—C12177.66 (14)O22—S2—C211—C21623.95 (15)
N11—C11—C12—C1338.2 (2)O21—S2—C211—C216153.20 (13)
C11—C12—C13—C1432.5 (2)N21—S2—C211—C21691.45 (14)
C11—N11—C14—C1311.09 (18)O22—S2—C211—C212157.40 (13)
S1—N11—C14—C13159.11 (12)O21—S2—C211—C21228.14 (14)
C12—C13—C14—N1113.63 (19)N21—S2—C211—C21287.21 (13)
C24—N21—C21—C2231.2 (2)C216—C211—C212—N22178.30 (16)
S2—N21—C21—C22173.45 (15)S2—C211—C212—N220.3 (2)
N21—C21—C22—C2311.7 (3)C216—C211—C212—C2130.2 (2)
C21—C22—C23—C2411.0 (3)S2—C211—C212—C213178.81 (11)
C21—N21—C24—C2337.5 (2)N22—C212—C213—C214178.60 (15)
S2—N21—C24—C23179.70 (14)C211—C212—C213—C2140.0 (2)
C22—C23—C24—N2129.2 (2)C212—C213—C214—C2150.3 (3)
O12—S1—C111—C11622.94 (13)C213—C214—C215—C2160.3 (3)
O11—S1—C111—C116152.46 (11)C214—C215—C216—C2110.0 (3)
N11—S1—C111—C11692.31 (12)C212—C211—C216—C2150.2 (3)
O12—S1—C111—C112158.62 (12)S2—C211—C216—C215178.89 (15)
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N12—H12C···O210.78 (3)2.39 (3)3.121 (2)155 (3)
N12—H12D···O110.84 (3)2.10 (3)2.776 (3)138 (3)
N22—H21C···O11i0.82 (2)2.30 (2)3.106 (2)168 (2)
N22—H21D···O210.87 (2)2.07 (2)2.783 (2)138.8 (17)
C114—H114···O22ii0.932.593.391 (2)144
C116—H116···O120.932.462.8505 (19)105
C216—H216···O220.932.522.897 (2)105
Symmetry codes: (i) x+1, y+1, z+1; (ii) x+2, y1/2, z+3/2.
2-(Piperidine-1-sulfonyl)aniline (ka115) top
Crystal data top
C11H16N2O2SDx = 1.353 Mg m3
Mr = 240.32Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Orthorhombic, PbcaCell parameters from 9577 reflections
a = 11.1747 (4) Åθ = 2.9–28.3°
b = 10.4850 (4) ŵ = 0.26 mm1
c = 20.1368 (8) ÅT = 200 K
V = 2359.36 (15) Å3Block, colourless
Z = 80.49 × 0.26 × 0.25 mm
F(000) = 1024
Data collection top
Bruker APEXII CCD
diffractometer
2935 independent reflections
Radiation source: sealed tube2583 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromatorRint = 0.020
Detector resolution: 8.3333 pixels mm-1θmax = 28.3°, θmin = 2.0°
φ and ω scansh = 1414
Absorption correction: numerical
(SADABS; Bruker, 2008)
k = 1313
Tmin = 0.944, Tmax = 1.000l = 2626
57075 measured reflections
Refinement top
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: dual
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.029Hydrogen site location: mixed
wR(F2) = 0.087H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
S = 1.05 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0456P)2 + 0.8126P]
where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
2935 reflections(Δ/σ)max = 0.001
153 parametersΔρmax = 0.34 e Å3
0 restraintsΔρmin = 0.36 e Å3
Special details top

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.

Refinement. Carbon-bound H atoms were placed in calculated positions and were included in the refinement in the riding model approximation, with Uiso(H) set to 1.2 Ueq(C).

The nitrogen-bound H atoms were located on a difference map and refined freely.

Single-crystal X-ray diffraction (SC-XRD) data were collected at 200 or 296 K on a Bruker APEXII CCD diffractometer with graphite-monochromated Mo Kα radiation using the APEX2 data collection software and SAINT (Bruker 2012) for cell refinement and data reduction. The structures were solved by dual-space methods applying SHELXT2018 (Sheldrick, 2015a) and refined by least-squares procedures using SHELXL2018 (Sheldrick, 2015b). Data were corrected for absorption effects using the numerical method implemented in SADABS (Bruker 2012). All non-H atoms were refined anisotropically. The crystal structure diagrams were drawn with ORTEP-3 for Windows (Farrugia 2012).

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/Ueq
S10.66247 (2)0.46255 (3)0.35628 (2)0.02489 (10)
O10.78413 (7)0.45299 (8)0.37905 (5)0.0331 (2)
O20.60807 (8)0.58657 (8)0.35302 (5)0.0344 (2)
N10.48648 (11)0.51544 (13)0.23579 (7)0.0417 (3)
N20.58073 (8)0.37768 (9)0.40733 (5)0.0257 (2)
C110.65595 (9)0.38973 (11)0.27755 (6)0.0245 (2)
C120.56770 (10)0.41892 (11)0.22957 (6)0.0281 (2)
C130.56702 (11)0.34467 (13)0.17139 (6)0.0340 (3)
H130.5091260.3617870.1380160.041*
C140.64803 (12)0.24808 (13)0.16172 (6)0.0357 (3)
H140.6443950.1990060.1221120.043*
C150.73532 (11)0.22069 (12)0.20879 (6)0.0336 (3)
H150.7915530.1542190.2014490.040*
C160.73871 (10)0.29170 (11)0.26622 (6)0.0280 (2)
H160.7980890.2739890.2987030.034*
C210.61856 (11)0.24349 (12)0.41533 (6)0.0320 (3)
H21A0.7064330.2394990.4212350.038*
H21B0.5975320.1944560.3749680.038*
C220.55700 (14)0.18533 (15)0.47531 (7)0.0429 (3)
H22A0.5846690.2291650.5160520.051*
H22B0.5793470.0942190.4788910.051*
C230.42189 (13)0.19665 (15)0.47012 (8)0.0460 (3)
H23A0.3927000.1444320.4324950.055*
H23B0.3843360.1642500.5113300.055*
C240.38708 (12)0.33508 (15)0.45955 (8)0.0448 (3)
H24A0.4089170.3853590.4993570.054*
H24B0.2993370.3411430.4535080.054*
C250.44964 (11)0.39042 (13)0.39903 (7)0.0358 (3)
H25A0.4236720.3444560.3585730.043*
H25B0.4281100.4814860.3939570.043*
H1A0.4305 (18)0.5177 (17)0.2083 (9)0.050 (5)*
H1B0.4888 (14)0.5639 (15)0.2697 (8)0.037 (4)*
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top
U11U22U33U12U13U23
S10.02117 (15)0.02347 (15)0.03003 (16)0.00296 (9)0.00057 (10)0.00017 (10)
O10.0226 (4)0.0393 (5)0.0373 (5)0.0060 (3)0.0045 (3)0.0021 (4)
O20.0350 (5)0.0231 (4)0.0451 (5)0.0009 (3)0.0032 (4)0.0006 (4)
N10.0315 (6)0.0460 (7)0.0476 (7)0.0119 (5)0.0111 (5)0.0009 (6)
N20.0240 (4)0.0249 (5)0.0280 (5)0.0019 (4)0.0011 (4)0.0007 (4)
C110.0214 (5)0.0253 (5)0.0267 (5)0.0027 (4)0.0000 (4)0.0037 (4)
C120.0223 (5)0.0299 (6)0.0319 (6)0.0030 (4)0.0010 (4)0.0078 (5)
C130.0318 (6)0.0419 (7)0.0284 (6)0.0068 (5)0.0052 (5)0.0056 (5)
C140.0425 (7)0.0369 (7)0.0277 (6)0.0089 (5)0.0021 (5)0.0001 (5)
C150.0360 (6)0.0300 (6)0.0349 (6)0.0010 (5)0.0073 (5)0.0021 (5)
C160.0251 (5)0.0287 (6)0.0303 (5)0.0002 (4)0.0008 (4)0.0056 (4)
C210.0366 (6)0.0278 (6)0.0315 (6)0.0029 (5)0.0030 (5)0.0057 (5)
C220.0485 (8)0.0458 (8)0.0344 (7)0.0000 (6)0.0024 (6)0.0149 (6)
C230.0457 (8)0.0512 (8)0.0409 (7)0.0114 (7)0.0090 (6)0.0132 (6)
C240.0321 (6)0.0538 (9)0.0486 (8)0.0040 (6)0.0118 (6)0.0041 (7)
C250.0234 (5)0.0384 (7)0.0455 (7)0.0019 (5)0.0014 (5)0.0089 (6)
Geometric parameters (Å, º) top
S1—O21.4369 (9)C15—H150.9500
S1—O11.4382 (8)C16—H160.9500
S1—N21.6381 (10)C21—C221.5178 (17)
S1—C111.7611 (12)C21—H21A0.9900
N1—C121.3652 (17)C21—H21B0.9900
N1—H1A0.836 (19)C22—C231.518 (2)
N1—H1B0.852 (17)C22—H22A0.9900
N2—C211.4780 (15)C22—H22B0.9900
N2—C251.4804 (15)C23—C241.518 (2)
C11—C161.4014 (16)C23—H23A0.9900
C11—C121.4141 (15)C23—H23B0.9900
C12—C131.4066 (18)C24—C251.5200 (18)
C13—C141.3723 (19)C24—H24A0.9900
C13—H130.9500C24—H24B0.9900
C14—C151.3901 (18)C25—H25A0.9900
C14—H140.9500C25—H25B0.9900
C15—C161.3759 (17)
O2—S1—O1118.52 (5)N2—C21—C22109.85 (11)
O2—S1—N2106.51 (5)N2—C21—H21A109.7
O1—S1—N2106.81 (5)C22—C21—H21A109.7
O2—S1—C11109.50 (5)N2—C21—H21B109.7
O1—S1—C11107.21 (5)C22—C21—H21B109.7
N2—S1—C11107.84 (5)H21A—C21—H21B108.2
C12—N1—H1A117.2 (12)C21—C22—C23111.39 (11)
C12—N1—H1B119.7 (10)C21—C22—H22A109.4
H1A—N1—H1B122.5 (16)C23—C22—H22A109.4
C21—N2—C25112.41 (10)C21—C22—H22B109.4
C21—N2—S1115.21 (8)C23—C22—H22B109.4
C25—N2—S1115.59 (8)H22A—C22—H22B108.0
C16—C11—C12120.52 (11)C24—C23—C22109.84 (12)
C16—C11—S1115.92 (8)C24—C23—H23A109.7
C12—C11—S1123.37 (9)C22—C23—H23A109.7
N1—C12—C13118.89 (11)C24—C23—H23B109.7
N1—C12—C11124.15 (12)C22—C23—H23B109.7
C13—C12—C11116.94 (11)H23A—C23—H23B108.2
C14—C13—C12121.54 (11)C23—C24—C25111.08 (12)
C14—C13—H13119.2C23—C24—H24A109.4
C12—C13—H13119.2C25—C24—H24A109.4
C13—C14—C15121.24 (12)C23—C24—H24B109.4
C13—C14—H14119.4C25—C24—H24B109.4
C15—C14—H14119.4H24A—C24—H24B108.0
C16—C15—C14118.73 (12)N2—C25—C24109.28 (11)
C16—C15—H15120.6N2—C25—H25A109.8
C14—C15—H15120.6C24—C25—H25A109.8
C15—C16—C11121.03 (11)N2—C25—H25B109.8
C15—C16—H16119.5C24—C25—H25B109.8
C11—C16—H16119.5H25A—C25—H25B108.3
O2—S1—N2—C21177.25 (8)N1—C12—C13—C14178.65 (12)
O1—S1—N2—C2155.17 (9)C11—C12—C13—C140.20 (17)
C11—S1—N2—C2159.79 (9)C12—C13—C14—C150.85 (19)
O2—S1—N2—C2543.41 (10)C13—C14—C15—C160.67 (19)
O1—S1—N2—C25170.99 (9)C14—C15—C16—C110.15 (18)
C11—S1—N2—C2574.05 (10)C12—C11—C16—C150.80 (17)
O2—S1—C11—C16158.65 (8)S1—C11—C16—C15174.39 (9)
O1—S1—C11—C1628.86 (10)C25—N2—C21—C2258.70 (14)
N2—S1—C11—C1685.83 (9)S1—N2—C21—C22166.02 (9)
O2—S1—C11—C1226.31 (11)N2—C21—C22—C2355.96 (15)
O1—S1—C11—C12156.11 (9)C21—C22—C23—C2454.92 (17)
N2—S1—C11—C1289.20 (10)C22—C23—C24—C2555.71 (17)
C16—C11—C12—N1177.75 (12)C21—N2—C25—C2459.34 (14)
S1—C11—C12—N17.43 (17)S1—N2—C25—C24165.56 (9)
C16—C11—C12—C130.61 (16)C23—C24—C25—N257.41 (16)
S1—C11—C12—C13174.21 (8)
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N1—H1A···O1i0.836 (19)2.496 (19)3.3000 (16)161.8 (16)
N1—H1B···O20.852 (17)2.156 (17)2.8240 (17)135.1 (14)
C16—H16···O10.952.482.8774 (15)105
C16—H16···O2ii0.952.483.2576 (14)139
C21—H21A···O10.992.552.9635 (15)105
C25—H25B···O20.992.442.8675 (15)106
Symmetry codes: (i) x1/2, y, z+1/2; (ii) x+3/2, y1/2, z.
2-(2,3-Dihydro-1H-indole-1-sulfonyl)aniline (ja189) top
Crystal data top
C14H14N2O2SF(000) = 576
Mr = 274.33Dx = 1.397 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/nMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
a = 9.7990 (11) ÅCell parameters from 9932 reflections
b = 10.2612 (13) Åθ = 2.4–28.4°
c = 13.2010 (16) ŵ = 0.25 mm1
β = 100.682 (5)°T = 296 K
V = 1304.4 (3) Å3Block, colourless
Z = 40.54 × 0.34 × 0.34 mm
Data collection top
Bruker APEXII CCD
diffractometer
3275 independent reflections
Radiation source: sealed tube2726 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromatorRint = 0.031
Detector resolution: 8.3333 pixels mm-1θmax = 28.7°, θmin = 2.4°
φ and ω scansh = 1313
Absorption correction: numerical
(SADABS; Bruker, 2008)
k = 1312
Tmin = 0.925, Tmax = 1.000l = 1617
28600 measured reflections
Refinement top
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: dual
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.039Hydrogen site location: mixed
wR(F2) = 0.113H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
S = 1.05 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.053P)2 + 0.4178P]
where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
3275 reflections(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
180 parametersΔρmax = 0.27 e Å3
0 restraintsΔρmin = 0.42 e Å3
Special details top

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.

Refinement. Carbon-bound H atoms were placed in calculated positions and were included in the refinement in the riding model approximation, with Uiso(H) set to 1.2 Ueq(C).

The nitrogen-bound H atoms were located on a difference map and refined freely.

Single-crystal X-ray diffraction (SC-XRD) data were collected at 200 or 296 K on a Bruker APEXII CCD diffractometer with graphite-monochromated Mo Kα radiation using the APEX2 data collection software and SAINT (Bruker 2012) for cell refinement and data reduction. The structures were solved by dual-space methods applying SHELXT2018 (Sheldrick, 2015a) and refined by least-squares procedures using SHELXL2018 (Sheldrick, 2015b). Data were corrected for absorption effects using the numerical method implemented in SADABS (Bruker 2012). All non-H atoms were refined anisotropically. The crystal structure diagrams were drawn with ORTEP-3 for Windows (Farrugia 2012).

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/Ueq
S10.38977 (4)0.26951 (4)0.46693 (3)0.04455 (13)
O10.46972 (13)0.21097 (14)0.55683 (9)0.0646 (4)
O20.45941 (11)0.31734 (14)0.38820 (9)0.0593 (3)
N10.31329 (14)0.39561 (13)0.50488 (10)0.0476 (3)
N20.1992 (2)0.27928 (18)0.25271 (12)0.0630 (4)
C10.20394 (18)0.60239 (16)0.50168 (14)0.0536 (4)
H1A0.2629360.6751020.5285840.064*
H1B0.1190550.6359280.4602300.064*
C20.27807 (18)0.51224 (17)0.43895 (13)0.0532 (4)
H2A0.2180440.4891190.3744870.064*
H2B0.3613890.5530510.4239850.064*
C110.23714 (14)0.39828 (15)0.58651 (11)0.0418 (3)
C120.17276 (15)0.51848 (15)0.58744 (12)0.0457 (3)
C130.09543 (18)0.5451 (2)0.66236 (15)0.0621 (5)
H130.0521080.6255290.6638180.074*
C140.08286 (19)0.4512 (2)0.73524 (14)0.0681 (5)
H140.0306340.4685250.7857690.082*
C150.1472 (2)0.3326 (2)0.73330 (13)0.0626 (5)
H150.1378950.2704450.7828200.075*
C160.22563 (19)0.30382 (18)0.65894 (13)0.0542 (4)
H160.2691400.2234170.6578800.065*
C210.26219 (15)0.15726 (15)0.41371 (11)0.0437 (3)
C220.18015 (15)0.17834 (16)0.31512 (11)0.0460 (3)
C230.07113 (18)0.0912 (2)0.28389 (15)0.0631 (5)
H230.0129370.1035080.2204840.076*
C240.0478 (3)0.0110 (2)0.3436 (2)0.0826 (7)
H240.0267700.0662880.3206080.099*
C250.1320 (3)0.0348 (2)0.4375 (2)0.0866 (7)
H250.1165770.1069410.4765220.104*
C260.2397 (2)0.04998 (18)0.47264 (15)0.0658 (5)
H260.2973160.0352680.5359350.079*
H2C0.283 (3)0.308 (3)0.259 (2)0.093 (8)*
H2D0.143 (2)0.282 (2)0.1916 (19)0.079 (7)*
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top
U11U22U33U12U13U23
S10.03429 (19)0.0609 (3)0.0368 (2)0.00384 (14)0.00238 (14)0.00607 (15)
O10.0543 (7)0.0854 (9)0.0466 (6)0.0190 (6)0.0106 (5)0.0049 (6)
O20.0413 (6)0.0893 (9)0.0505 (6)0.0069 (6)0.0168 (5)0.0118 (6)
N10.0533 (7)0.0477 (7)0.0460 (7)0.0005 (5)0.0201 (6)0.0009 (5)
N20.0658 (10)0.0767 (11)0.0394 (7)0.0037 (8)0.0085 (7)0.0020 (7)
C10.0514 (9)0.0459 (8)0.0602 (10)0.0043 (7)0.0018 (7)0.0025 (7)
C20.0580 (9)0.0544 (9)0.0467 (8)0.0048 (7)0.0082 (7)0.0049 (7)
C110.0386 (7)0.0491 (8)0.0382 (7)0.0074 (6)0.0089 (5)0.0069 (6)
C120.0367 (7)0.0504 (8)0.0478 (8)0.0058 (6)0.0021 (6)0.0117 (6)
C130.0494 (9)0.0730 (12)0.0643 (11)0.0018 (8)0.0120 (8)0.0241 (9)
C140.0543 (10)0.1020 (16)0.0522 (10)0.0112 (10)0.0210 (8)0.0224 (10)
C150.0631 (10)0.0831 (13)0.0444 (8)0.0183 (10)0.0172 (8)0.0028 (9)
C160.0612 (10)0.0570 (9)0.0472 (8)0.0061 (8)0.0174 (7)0.0004 (7)
C210.0431 (7)0.0464 (8)0.0408 (7)0.0043 (6)0.0059 (6)0.0059 (6)
C220.0404 (7)0.0561 (9)0.0410 (7)0.0047 (6)0.0063 (6)0.0137 (7)
C230.0492 (9)0.0793 (13)0.0604 (10)0.0090 (8)0.0090 (8)0.0296 (9)
C240.0846 (15)0.0786 (14)0.0913 (16)0.0327 (12)0.0334 (13)0.0391 (13)
C250.126 (2)0.0500 (11)0.0938 (17)0.0192 (12)0.0453 (16)0.0082 (11)
C260.0888 (14)0.0504 (10)0.0582 (10)0.0058 (9)0.0139 (9)0.0003 (8)
Geometric parameters (Å, º) top
S1—O11.4277 (12)C13—C141.383 (3)
S1—O21.4317 (12)C13—H130.9300
S1—N11.6205 (14)C14—C151.373 (3)
S1—C211.7486 (16)C14—H140.9300
N1—C111.4203 (18)C15—C161.387 (2)
N1—C21.482 (2)C15—H150.9300
N2—C221.358 (2)C16—H160.9300
N2—H2C0.86 (3)C21—C261.389 (2)
N2—H2D0.89 (2)C21—C221.414 (2)
C1—C121.498 (2)C22—C231.396 (2)
C1—C21.514 (2)C23—C241.357 (3)
C1—H1A0.9700C23—H230.9300
C1—H1B0.9700C24—C251.378 (4)
C2—H2A0.9700C24—H240.9300
C2—H2B0.9700C25—C261.380 (3)
C11—C161.381 (2)C25—H250.9300
C11—C121.386 (2)C26—H260.9300
C12—C131.380 (2)
O1—S1—O2119.06 (8)C12—C13—C14119.49 (18)
O1—S1—N1107.04 (7)C12—C13—H13120.3
O2—S1—N1105.10 (8)C14—C13—H13120.3
O1—S1—C21107.35 (8)C15—C14—C13120.27 (16)
O2—S1—C21109.61 (7)C15—C14—H14119.9
N1—S1—C21108.24 (7)C13—C14—H14119.9
C11—N1—C2109.39 (13)C14—C15—C16121.27 (18)
C11—N1—S1126.02 (11)C14—C15—H15119.4
C2—N1—S1122.27 (11)C16—C15—H15119.4
C22—N2—H2C115.9 (18)C11—C16—C15117.89 (18)
C22—N2—H2D116.2 (15)C11—C16—H16121.1
H2C—N2—H2D120 (2)C15—C16—H16121.1
C12—C1—C2104.35 (13)C26—C21—C22120.97 (16)
C12—C1—H1A110.9C26—C21—S1118.22 (13)
C2—C1—H1A110.9C22—C21—S1120.75 (12)
C12—C1—H1B110.9N2—C22—C23119.58 (16)
C2—C1—H1B110.9N2—C22—C21123.81 (15)
H1A—C1—H1B108.9C23—C22—C21116.57 (17)
N1—C2—C1104.80 (13)C24—C23—C22121.75 (19)
N1—C2—H2A110.8C24—C23—H23119.1
C1—C2—H2A110.8C22—C23—H23119.1
N1—C2—H2B110.8C23—C24—C25121.5 (2)
C1—C2—H2B110.8C23—C24—H24119.3
H2A—C2—H2B108.9C25—C24—H24119.3
C16—C11—C12121.52 (14)C24—C25—C26118.9 (2)
C16—C11—N1129.33 (15)C24—C25—H25120.5
C12—C11—N1109.13 (13)C26—C25—H25120.5
C13—C12—C11119.57 (16)C25—C26—C21120.1 (2)
C13—C12—C1130.07 (16)C25—C26—H26119.9
C11—C12—C1110.35 (14)C21—C26—H26119.9
O1—S1—N1—C1148.70 (15)C13—C14—C15—C160.1 (3)
O2—S1—N1—C11176.21 (12)C12—C11—C16—C150.0 (2)
C21—S1—N1—C1166.72 (14)N1—C11—C16—C15178.04 (15)
O1—S1—N1—C2150.47 (13)C14—C15—C16—C110.1 (3)
O2—S1—N1—C222.96 (14)O1—S1—C21—C2612.71 (16)
C21—S1—N1—C294.10 (13)O2—S1—C21—C26143.37 (14)
C11—N1—C2—C114.13 (17)N1—S1—C21—C26102.51 (14)
S1—N1—C2—C1177.78 (11)O1—S1—C21—C22169.99 (12)
C12—C1—C2—N112.92 (16)O2—S1—C21—C2239.34 (14)
C2—N1—C11—C16172.19 (16)N1—S1—C21—C2274.79 (13)
S1—N1—C11—C169.3 (2)C26—C21—C22—N2178.22 (17)
C2—N1—C11—C129.61 (16)S1—C21—C22—N24.6 (2)
S1—N1—C11—C12172.49 (11)C26—C21—C22—C234.0 (2)
C16—C11—C12—C130.1 (2)S1—C21—C22—C23173.18 (12)
N1—C11—C12—C13178.25 (13)N2—C22—C23—C24179.93 (19)
C16—C11—C12—C1179.21 (14)C21—C22—C23—C242.1 (3)
N1—C11—C12—C10.84 (16)C22—C23—C24—C251.0 (3)
C2—C1—C12—C13173.18 (16)C23—C24—C25—C262.1 (4)
C2—C1—C12—C117.85 (17)C24—C25—C26—C210.1 (3)
C11—C12—C13—C140.2 (2)C22—C21—C26—C253.0 (3)
C1—C12—C13—C14179.12 (16)S1—C21—C26—C25174.28 (16)
C12—C13—C14—C150.2 (3)
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N2—H2C···O20.86 (3)2.19 (3)2.857 (2)134 (2)
N2—H2D···O1i0.89 (2)2.22 (3)3.098 (2)169 (2)
C15—H15···O2ii0.932.593.366 (2)141
C16—H16···O10.932.583.105 (2)117
C26—H26···O10.932.452.849 (3)106
Symmetry codes: (i) x1/2, y+1/2, z1/2; (ii) x1/2, y+1/2, z+1/2.
Hydrogen-bond, C—H···(π ring) and ππ stacking interaction geometry for the crystal structures of p-sulfanilamide (B), o-sulfanilamide (D), o-nitrosulfonamides 13 and N-cycloamino-o-sulfanilamides 46 top
CompoundInteractionD—H (Å)H···A (Å)D···A (Å)D—H···A (°)ππ (Å)
o-Nitro sulfonamides
1C11—H11A···O1i0.992.563.398 (7)143
C11—H11B···O40.992.483.093 (9)120
C25—H25···O4ii0.952.543.240 (2)131
C25—H25···O1iii0.952.473.229 (2)137
C26—H26···O20.952.492.860 (2)103
C26—H26···O3iv0.952.563.467 (2)160
2C11—H11A···O20.972.482.907 (2)107
C11—H11A···O2i0.972.593.476 (2)152
C15—H15B···O10.972.512.943 (2)107
C25—H25···O2v0.932.573.334 (2)140
C26—H26···O10.932.532.877 (2)103
3C16—H16···O20.932.412.975 (2)119
C16—H16···O2vi0.932.553.195 (2)127
C23—H23···O1vii0.932.303.086 (3)142
C26—H26···N10.932.602.983 (2)105
Cg1···Cg2i3.6967 (11)
Cg2···Cg1i3.6968 (11)
N-Cycloamino-o-sulfanilamides
4N12—H12C···O210.78 (3)2.40 (3)3.121 (3)155 (3)
N12—H12D···O110.84 (3)2.10 (3)2.776 (3)138 (3)
N22—H21C···O11i0.82 (3)2.30 (3)3.106 (2)168 (2)
N22—H21D···O210.87 (2)2.07 (2)2.783 (2)139 (2)
C114—H114···O22xii0.932.593.391 (3)144
C116—H116···O120.932.462.851 (2)105
C216—H216···O22'0.932.522.897 (2)105
5N1—H1A···O1xiii0.836 (19)2.496 (19)3.2999 (16)161.8 (16)
N1—H1B···O20.852 (16)2.156 (16)2.8240 (17)135.1 (14)
C16—H16···O10.952.482.8774 (15)105
C16—H16···O2xiv0.952.483.2577 (15)139
C21—H21A···O10.992.552.9635 (15)105
C25—H25B···O20.992.442.8675 (16)106
6N2—H2C···O20.86 (3)2.19 (3)2.857 (2)134 (2)
N2—H2D···O1xv0.89 (2)2.22 (2)3.098 (2)168.8 (19)
C15—H15···O2xvi0.932.593.366 (2)141
C16—H16···O10.932.583.105 (2)117
C26—H26···O10.932.452.849 (2)106
C1—H1B···Cg1xvii0.972.973.817 (2)147
S1—O2···Cg2i3.5773 (15)
Symmetry codes: (i) -x+1, -y+1, -z+1; (ii) -x+3/2, y+1/2, z-1/2; (iii) x+1/2, -y+3/2, z+1/2; (iv) x+1/2, -y+3/2, z-1/2; (v) x-1/2, -y+3/2, z+1/2; (vi) -x+2, -y+1, -z+1; (vii) x+1/2, -y+3/2, z-1/2; (viii) x+1/2, -y+3/2, z+1/2; (ix) x+1/2, -y+1/2, z+1/2; (x) -x+1/2, y+1/2, -z+3/2; (xi) x, y, z+1; (xii) -x+2, y-1/2, -z+3/2; (xiii) x-1/2, y, -z+1/2; (xiv) -x+3/2, y-1/2, z; (xv) x-1/2, -y+1/2, z-1/2; (xvi) x-1/2, -y+1/2, z+1/2; (xvii) -x, -y+1, -z+1; (xviii) x, -y+1/2, z+1/2; (xix) -x+1, y-1/2, -z+3/2; (xx) x-1/2, -y+1/2, -z+1; (xxi) -x+1, -y, -z+1; (xxii) -x+1, y+1/2, z-1/2. Centroids for 3: Cg1 N1/C1/C2/C12/C11; Cg2 C11–C16; Cg3 C21–C26; for 4: Cg1 C22–C27; for 5 Cg1 C11–C16; Cg2 N1/C2/C1/C12/C11; for 6 Cg1 C21–C26.
Percentage contributions of selected interatomic contacts to the Hirshfeld surface of compounds top
C···HO···HN···H
o-Nitro sulfonamides
115.242.30.6
215.341.71.4
314.040.30.0
N-Cycloamino-o-sulfanilamides
415.225.93.5
516.522.43.4
630.419.62.1
Surface interactions of o-nitrosulfonamides 13 and N-cycloamino-o-sulfanilamides 46 top
Compounddnormdide
Minimum valueMaximum valueMinimum valueMaximum valueMinimum valueMaximum value
1–0.25650.97430.90922.38490.90832.4152
2–0.10711.09141.06652.43901.06692.4804
3–0.32231.70070.93192.68090.93222.6406
4–0.37841.28640.88732.49890.93192.4948
5–0.20601.35950.99442.69680.99572.5141
6–0.38661.29890.88422.77910.88382.5779
Frontier molecular orbital energies of synthesized compounds 16 top
Parameter (eV)o-Nitro sulfonamidesN-Cycloamino-o-sulfanilamides
123456
HOMO energy (EHOMO)–7.228–7.386–6.415–6.189–6.211–6.142
LUMO energy (ELUMO)–2.982–2.973–3.175–1.627–1.287–1.451
ΔE gap4.2464.4133.244.5624.9244.691
Ionization potential (I)7.2287.3866.4156.1896.2116.142
Electron affinity (A)2.9822.9733.1751.6271.2871.451
Chemical potential (µ)–5.105–5.1795–4.795–3.908–3.749–3.7965
Electronegativity (χ)5.1055.17954.7953.9083.7493.7965
Global hardness (η)2.1232.20651.622.2812.4622.3455
Global softness (S)0.4710.4530.6170.4380.4060.426
Global electrophilicity (ω)27.66429.59718.62417.41817.30116.903
Energies of o-nitrosulfonamides 13 and N-cycloamino-o-sulfanilamides 46 with the hCA II (4iwz) and hCA IX (5fl4) isoenzymes top
1-1.351-0.807-38.102-40.980-0.079-0.047
2-2.223-1.977-41.329-42.073-0.124-0.110
3-1.288-1.538-40.486-38.954-0.061-0.073
4-1.645-1.451-37.113-35.898-0.110-0.097
5-1.636-1.605-41.034-34.609-0.102-0.100
6-0.784-1.368-47.945-42.454-0.0410.072
A-2.252--55.202--0.125-
B--1.969-41.029-0.082
Note: A is N-(5-sulfamoyl-1,3,4-thiadiazol-2-yl)-2-(thiophen-2-yl)acetamide and B is 5-[1-(naphthalen-1-yl)-1,2,3-triazol-4-yl]thiophene-2-sulfonamide.
Hydrogen-bond and mixed π-interactions of o-nitrosulfonamides 13 and N-cycloamino-o-sulfanilamides 46 with the hCA II (4iwz) and hCA IX (5fl4) isoenzymes top
Isoenzyme/EntryCarbonic anhydrase II (PDB id: 4iwz)Carbonic anhydrase IX (PDB id: 5fl4)
Hydrogen bond (Å)ππ or π–cation (Å)Hydrogen bond (Å)ππ or π–cation (Å)
o-Nitrosulfonamides
1GLN92 (2.13)GLN92 (2.14)HID94 (4.08) π–cation
2ASN62 (2.33), ASN67 (2.55)GLN71 (2.28), THR201 (2.13)HID94 (4.07) π–cation
3GLN92 (2.25), ASN62 (2.74)TRP5 (5.36) ππ stackingGLN71 (2.26)HID94 (4.05) π–cation
N-Cycloamino-o-sulfanilamides
4GLN92 (2.04), THR199 (2.29)THR201 (2.03)
5GLN92 (1.78), THR199 (2.26)
6GLN92 (1.88), TRP5 (2.11)THR199 (1.81) ππ stackingGLU92 (2.47)
AGLN92 (2.39), HIE64 (2.24)HIS94 (4.75) ππ stacking
BASP13 (1.59), ??? (2.73), VAL130 (2.53)HID94 (5.49) π–cation
Note: A is N-(5-sulfamoyl-1,3,4-thiadiazol-2-yl)-2-(thiophen-2-yl)acetamide and B is 5-[1-(naphthalen-1-yl)-1,2,3-triazol-4-yl]thiophene-2-sulfonamide.
 

Acknowledgements

This work was funded, in part, by the University of Lagos Central Research Committee, Nigerian Government TetFund IBR and National Research Foundation (NRF) of South Africa. The authors thank the Center for High Performance Computing (CHPC), Cape Town, South Africa, for providing the platform for carrying out the mol­ecular modelling studies on the Schrödinger Platform for protein preparation. The authors have no relevant financial or nonfinancial inter­est to disclose. All authors contributed to the conception and design of the study. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by Sherif O. Kolade, Eric C. Hosten, Allen T. Gordon, Idris A. Olasupo and Olayinka T. Asekun. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Josephat U. Izunobi, Adeniyi S. Ogunlaja and Oluwole B. Familoni, and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Funding information

Funding for this research was provided by: University of Lagos Central Research Committee (grant No. CRC No. 2015/25 to Oluwole Familoni); Nigerian Government TetFund IBR (grant No. CRC/TETFUND/No. 2018/016 to Josephat Izunobi); National Research Foundation (NRF) of South Africa (grant No. Grant No: 129887).

References

First citationAbbaz, T., Bendjeddou, A. & Villemin, D. (2018). Arch. Curr. Res. Int. 14, 1–13.  CrossRef Google Scholar
First citationAjani, O. O., Familoni, O. B., Wu, F., Echeme, J. O. & Sujiang, Z. (2012). Int. J. Med. Chem. 2012, 367815.  PubMed Google Scholar
First citationAlex, A. A. & Storer, R. I. (2010). Metabolism, Pharmacokinetics and Toxicity of Functional Groups: Impact of Chemical Building Blocks on ADMET, edited by D. A. Smith, pp. 1–60. RSC Drug Discovery Series. Cambridge: Royal Society of Chemistry.  Google Scholar
First citationAl-Wahaibi, L. H., Joubert, J., Blacque, O., Al-Shaalan, N. H. & El-Emam, A. A. (2019). Sci. Rep. 9, 19745.  Web of Science PubMed Google Scholar
First citationAndreucci, E., Ruzzolini, J., Peppicelli, S., Bianchini, F., Laurenzana, A., Carta, F., Supuran, C. T. & Calorini, L. (2019). J. Enzyme Inhib. Med. Chem. 34, 117–123.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
First citationAngeli, A., Ferraroni, M., Pinteala, M., Maier, S. S., Simionescu, B. C., Carta, F., Del Prete, S., Capasso, C. & Supuran, C. T. (2020). Molecules, 25, 2269.  Web of Science CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
First citationBecke, A. D. (1993). J. Chem. Phys. 98, 5648–5652.  CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
First citationBerman, H. M., Westbrook, J., Feng, Z., Gilliland, G., Bhat, T. N., Weissig, H., Shindyalov, I. N. & Bourne, P. E. (2000). Nucleic Acids Res. 28, 235–242.  Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
First citationBernstein, J., Davis, R. E., Shimoni, L. & Chang, N.-L. (1995). Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 34, 1555–1573.  CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
First citationBiswas, S., McKenna, R. & Supuran, C. T. (2013). Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 23, 5646–5649.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
First citationBloom, B. M. & Laubach, G. D. (1962). Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. 2, 67–108.  CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
First citationBoyland, E. (1946). Biochem. J. 40, 55–58.  CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
First citationBruker (2008). SADABS. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.  Google Scholar
First citationBruker (2011). APEX2. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.  Google Scholar
First citationBruker (2012). SAINT. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.  Google Scholar
First citationCasini, A., Scozzafava, A., Mastrolorenzo, A. & Supuran, L. T. (2002). Curr. Cancer Drug Targets, 2, 55–75.  Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
First citationChiche, J., Brahimi-Horn, M. C. & Pouysségur, J. (2010). J. Cell. Mol. Med. 14, 771–794.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
First citationCongiu, C., Onnis, V., Balboni, G. & Supuran, C. T. (2014). Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 24, 1776–1779.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
First citationEl-Gaby, M. A., Ammar, Y. I. H., El-Qaliei, M. M., Ali, A. F., Hussein, M. & Faraghally, A. F. (2020). Egypt. J. Chem. 63, 5289–5327.  Google Scholar
First citationEtter, M. C., MacDonald, J. C. & Bernstein, J. (1990). Acta Cryst. B46, 256–262.  CrossRef ICSD CAS Web of Science IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationFarrugia, L. J. (2012). J. Appl. Cryst. 45, 849–854.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationFrisch, M. J., Trucks, G. W., Schlegel, H. B., Scuseria, G. E., Robb, M. A., Cheeseman, J. R., Scalmani, G., Barone, V., Petersson, G. A., Nakatsuji, H., Li, X., Caricato, M., Marenich, A. V., Bloino, J., Janesko, B. G., Gomperts, R., Mennucci, B., Hratchian, H. P., Ortiz, J. V., Izmaylov, A. F., Sonnenberg, J. L., Williams-Young, D., Ding, F., Lipparini, F., Egidi, F., Goings, J., Peng, B., Petrone, A., Henderson, T., Ranasinghe, D., Zakrzewski, V. G., Gao, J., Rega, N., Zheng, G., Liang, W., Hada, M., Ehara, M., Toyota, K., Fukuda, R., Hasegawa, J., Ishida, M., Nakajima, T., Honda, Y., Kitao, O., Nakai, H., Vreven, T., Throssell, K., Montgomery, J. A. Jr, Peralta, J. E., Ogliaro, F., Bearpark, M. J., Heyd, J. J., Brothers, E. N., Kudin, K. N., Staroverov, V. N., Keith, T. A., Kobayashi, R., Normand, J., Raghavachari, K., Rendell, A. P., Burant, J. C., Iyengar, S. S., Tomasi, J., Cossi, M., Millam, J. M., Klene, M., Adamo, C., Cammi, R., Ochterski, J. W., Martin, R. L., Morokuma, K., Farkas, O., Foresman, J. B. & Fox, D. J. (2016). GAUSSIAN16 and GaussView5.0. Gaussian Inc., Wallingford, CT, USA. https://gaussian.com/Google Scholar
First citationGelbrich, T., Bingham, A. L., Threlfall, T. L. & Hursthouse, M. B. (2008). Acta Cryst. C64, o205–o207.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationGhorab, M. M., Alsaid, M. S., Ceruso, M., Nissan, Y. M. & Supuran, C. T. (2014). Bioorg. Med. Chem. 22, 3684–3695.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
First citationGul, H. I., Tugrak, M., Sakagami, H., Taslimi, P., Gulcin, I. & Supuran, C. T. (2016). J. Enzyme Inhib. Med. Chem. 31, 1619–1624.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
First citationGüzel-Akdemir, Ö., Akdemir, A., Karalı, N. & Supuran, C. T. (2015). Org. Biomol. Chem. 13, 6493–6499.  Web of Science PubMed Google Scholar
First citationHenry, R. J. (1943). Bacteriol. Rev. 7, 175–262.  CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
First citationHübschle, C. B., Sheldrick, G. M. & Dittrich, B. (2011). J. Appl. Cryst. 44, 1281–1284.  Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationJeffrey, G. A. (1997). An Introduction to Hydrogen Bonding, p. 228. Oxford University Press.  Google Scholar
First citationKalgutkar, A. S., Jones, R. & Sawant, A. (2010). Metabolism, Pharmacokinetics and Toxicity of Functional Groups: Impact of Chemical Building Blocks on ADMET, edited by D. A. Smith, pp. 210–274. RSC Drug Discovery Series. Cambridge: Royal Society of Chemistry.  Google Scholar
First citationKolade, S. O., Izunobi, J. U., Hosten, E. C., Olasupo, I. A., Ogunlaja, A. S. & Familoni, O. B. (2020). Acta Cryst. C76, 810–820.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationKumar, S., Saini, V., Maurya, I. K., Sindhu, J., Kumari, M., Kataria, R. & Kumar, V. (2018). PLoS One, 13, e0196016.  Web of Science CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
First citationLaug, E. P. & Morris, H. J. (1939). Exp. Biol. Med. 42, 541–543.  CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
First citationLavanya, R. (2017). Int. J. Pharm. Sci. Invent. 6, 1–3.  Google Scholar
First citationLehtonen, J., Shen, B., Vihinen, M., Casini, A., Scozzafava, A., Supuran, C. T., Parkkila, A. K., Saarnio, J., Kivelä, A. J., Waheed, A., Sly, W. S. & Parkkila, S. (2004). J. Biol. Chem. 279, 2719–2727.  Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
First citationLeitans, J., Kazaks, A., Balode, A., Ivanova, J., Zalubovskis, R., Supuran, C. T. & Tars, K. (2015). J. Med. Chem. 58, 9004–9009.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
First citationLesch, J. E. (2007). The First Miracle Drugs: How the Sulfa Drugs Transformed Medicine, edited by John E. Lesch, pp. 1–364. Oxford University Press.  Google Scholar
First citationMacrae, C. F., Sovago, I., Cottrell, S. J., Galek, P. T. A., McCabe, P., Pidcock, E., Platings, M., Shields, G. P., Stevens, J. S., Towler, M. & Wood, P. A. (2020). J. Appl. Cryst. 53, 226–235.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationMcKinnon, J. J., Jayatilaka, D. & Spackman, M. A. (2007). Chem. Commun. pp. 3814–3818.  Web of Science CrossRef Google Scholar
First citationMilite, C., Amendola, G., Nocentini, A., Bua, S., Cipriano, A., Barresi, E., Feoli, A., Novellino, E., Da Settimo, F., Supuran, C. T., Castellano, S., Cosconati, S. & Taliani, S. (2019). J. Enzyme Inhib. Med. Chem. 34, 1697–1710.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
First citationMohan, R., Banerjee, M., Ray, A., Manna, T., Wilson, L., Owa, T., Bhattacharyya, B. & Panda, D. (2006). Biochemistry, 45, 5440–5449.  Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
First citationNainwal, L. M., Azad, C. S., Deswal, D. & Narula, A. K. (2018). ChemistrySelect, 3, 10762–10767.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
First citationNishimori, I., Minakuchi, T., Morimoto, K., Sano, S., Onishi, S., Takeuchi, H., Vullo, D., Scozzafava, A. & Supuran, C. T. (2006). J. Med. Chem. 49, 2117–2126.  Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
First citationNocentini, A., Ferraroni, M., Carta, F., Ceruso, M., Gratteri, P., Lanzi, C., Masini, E. & Supuran, C. T. (2016). J. Med. Chem. 59, 10692–10704.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
First citationOwa, T., Yokoi, A., Yamazaki, K., Yoshimatsu, K., Yamori, T. & Nagasu, T. (2002). J. Med. Chem. 45, 4913–4922.  Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
First citationPanwar, U. & Singh, S. K. (2021). Struct. Chem. 32, 337–352.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
First citationRathi, P. C., Ludlow, R. F. & Verdonk, M. L. (2020). J. Med. Chem. 63, 8778–8790.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
First citationRutkauskas, K., Zubrienė, A., Tumosienė, I., Kantminienė, K., Kažemėkaitė, M., Smirnov, A., Kazokaitė, J., Morkūnaitė, V., Čapkauskaitė, E., Manakova, E., Gražulis, S., Beresnevičius, Z. & Matulis, D. (2014). Molecules, 19, 17356–17380.  Web of Science CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
First citationShad, H. A., Chohan, Z. H., Tahir, M. N. & Khan, I. U. (2008). Acta Cryst. E64, o635.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationSheldrick, G. M. (2015a). Acta Cryst. A71, 3–8.  Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationSheldrick, G. M. (2015b). Acta Cryst. C71, 3–8.  Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationSchrödinger (2022). Schrödinger Suite. Release 2022-1. Schrödinger LLC, New York, USA. https://www.schrodinger.com/Google Scholar
First citationSly, W. S. & Hu, P. Y. (1995). Annu. Rev. Biochem. 64, 375–401.  CrossRef CAS PubMed Web of Science Google Scholar
First citationSpek, A. L. (2020). Acta Cryst. E76, 1–11.  Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationTemperini, C., Cecchi, A., Scozzafava, A. & Supuran, C. T. (2008a). Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 18, 2567–2573.  Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
First citationTemperini, C., Cecchi, A., Scozzafava, A. & Supuran, C. T. (2008b). Org. Biomol. Chem. 6, 2499–2506.  Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
First citationThiry, A., Supuran, C. T., Masereel, B. & Dogné, J. M. (2008). J. Med. Chem. 51, 3051–3056.  Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
First citationTüreci, Ö., Sahin, U., Vollmar, E., Siemer, S., Göttert, E., Seitz, G., Parkkila, A. K., Shah, G. N., Grubb, J. H., Pfreundschuh, M. & Sly, W. S. (1998). Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 95, 7608–7613.  Web of Science PubMed Google Scholar
First citationTurner, M. J., McKinnon, J. J., Wolff, S. K., Grimwood, D. J., Spackman, P. R., Jayatilaka, D. & Spackman, M. A. (2017). CrystalExplorer17. University of Western Australia.  Google Scholar
First citationVoronin, A. P., Volkova, T. V., Ilyukhin, A. B., Proshin, A. N. & Perlovich, G. L. (2020). CrystEngComm, 22, 349–360.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
First citationVullo, D., Franchi, M., Gallori, E., Pastorek, J., Scozzafava, A., Pastorekova, S. & Supuran, C. T. (2003). Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 13, 1005–1009.  Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
First citationYang, A. C., Vest, R. T., Kern, F., Lee, D. P., Agam, M., Maat, C. A., Losada, P. M., Chen, M. B., Schaum, N., Khoury, N., Toland, A., Calcuttawala, K., Shin, H., Pálovics, R., Shin, A., Wang, E. Y., Luo, J., Gate, D., Schulz-Schaeffer, J. A., Chu, P., Siegenthaler, J. A., McNerney, M. W., Keller, A. & Wyss-Coray, T. (2022). Nature, 603, 885–892.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
First citationŻołnowska, B., Sławiński, J., Pogorzelska, A., Chojnacki, J., Vullo, D. & Supuran, C. T. (2014). Eur. J. Med. Chem. 71, 135–147.  Web of Science PubMed Google Scholar

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.

Journal logoSTRUCTURAL
CHEMISTRY
ISSN: 2053-2296
Follow Acta Cryst. C
Sign up for e-alerts
Follow Acta Cryst. on Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds