sigma-hole interactions
Halogen bonds, chalcogen bonds, pnictogen bonds, tetrel bonds and other σ-hole interactions: a snapshot of current progress
aDepartment of Chemistry, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, S3 7HF, United Kingdom, and bDepartment of Chemistry, University of Turku, FI-20014 Turku, Finland
*Correspondence e-mail: lee.brammer@sheffield.ac.uk, anssi.peuronen@utu.fi, tom.roseveare@sheffield.ac.uk
We report here on the status of research on halogen bonds and other σ-hole interactions involving p-block elements in Lewis acidic roles, such as chalcogen bonds, pnictogen bonds and tetrel bonds. A brief overview of the available literature in this area is provided via a survey of the many review articles that address this field. Our focus has been to collect together most review articles published since 2013 to provide an easy entry into the extensive literature in this area. A snapshot of current research in the area is provided by an introduction to the virtual special issue compiled in this journal, comprising 11 articles and entitled `Halogen, chalcogen, pnictogen and tetrel bonds: structural chemistry and beyond.'
Keywords: halogen bond; chalcogen bond; pnictogen bond; tetrel bond; sigma-hole; noncovalent interaction; supramolecular chemistry.
1. Introduction
Halogen bonding and related intermolecular (and sometimes intramolecular) interactions in which p-block elements in groups other than Group 17 serve in a Lewis acidic role have been and continue to be extensively investigated. Their applicability in supramolecular assembly is similarly well studied, with numerous reports of applications in crystal engineering, molecular recognition, catalysis, polymers and soft matter, materials chemistry, structural biology and medicinal chemistry. Many of these areas are the subjects of reviews (see Section 2 for more details).
It has been noted that examples of this family of interactions, particularly halogen bonds, are implicit in reports of compounds and observed behaviour as far back as the early 19th century (Colin & Gaultier de Claubry, 1814; Colin, 1814; also see the note in Section 5). Extensive historical perspectives can be found in several substantial review articles (Cavallo et al., 2016; Gilday et al., 2015). Definition, identification and understanding of such interactions evolved slowly until the mid-20th century when work by Mulliken and others classified interactions of I2 with Lewis basic solvents as electron donor–acceptor complexes (Benesi & Hildebrand, 1948; Mulliken, 1950) based on UV–Vis spectroscopic studies. Complementary crystallographic studies of dihalogen interactions with such solvents by Hassel and co-workers then revealed the now well-known linear geometry and short interaction distances (Hassel & Hvoslef, 1954). This class of interactions became well established in the 1960s and 1970s, as reviews by Bent on donor–acceptor interactions (Bent, 1968) and by Alcock on secondary bonding (Alcock, 1972) attest. The prevailing description at that time was of an electron donor–acceptor interaction, with the Lewis acidic p-block atom involved in the electron-acceptor component. This bonding description is still common in current studies, but is dominant for the strongest interactions, whereas an electrostatic model for the interactions first advanced 15 years ago, and usually referred to as the σ-hole model (Clark et al., 2007; Politzer et al., 2013), is generally thought to provide the best description of weak to moderate strength interactions. Indeed, the electrostatic description has become sufficiently prevalent that this class of interactions is often referred to as σ-hole interactions, as we have done in the title of this article, although the term perhaps lacks universality since it implies a universal (electrostatic) bonding model. Alcock's earlier term secondary bonding is not prescriptive, but refers to interactions other than primary (covalent) bonds. Subclasses of interactions involving elements from a particular p-block group in the Lewis acidic role are most commonly named after the class of elements that comprise the group, the most common being halogen bonds (Group 17), chalcogen bonds (Group 16), pnictogen bonds (Group 15) and tetrel bonds (Group 14). In a tutorial review entitled `Hypervalency, secondary bonding and hydrogen bonding: siblings under the skin,' which also benefits from some historical perspective, Crabtree (2017) provides an important reminder that there is a continuum of behaviour, both in geometry and bonding description, from weak secondary bonding through to the strongest interactions that evolve into hypervalency of the main group elements. This continuum description applies equally to hydrogen bonding.
After a period of relative dormancy, the field of halogen bonding has grown enormously in the past 25 years, accelerated initially by studies in the late 1990s/early 2000s that made clear the similarities between halogen bonding and the more widely studied hydrogen bonding, notably the matrix-isolation and gas-phase rotational spectroscopy studies of Legon and co-workers (Legon, 1999), and the introduction by Resnati, Metrangolo and colleagues of perfluoroalkyl and -aryl halides to enable strong directional halogen bonding in the condensed phases (Corradi et al., 2000). The evolution of halogen bonding is such that not only are there many reviews on this topic (e.g. Metrangolo et al., 2005; Rissanen, 2008; Brammer et al., 2008; Fourmigué, 2009; Cavallo et al., 2010; Bertani et al., 2010; Parisini et al., 2011; Erdélyi, 2012), but many reviews even focus on specific applications of halogen bonding (Section 2.1). Chalcogen bonds are the next most widely studied class of secondary bonding interactions, their understanding and application having advanced considerably in the past decade. Reviews that focus specifically on these or the other classes of interactions are now also plentiful. Thus, we have endeavoured to bring together a compilation of the many topics that have been reviewed in the sections below, along with tabulated and categorized lists of reviews [including survey articles in which the Cambridge Structural Database (CSD; Groom et al., 2016) has been used as the primary source of experimental data to identify interactions, and reviews that include new computational studies of the compounds being surveyed]. The aim has been to provide an ease of departure into the extensive literature on the classes of interactions (Fig. 1) that are brought together in this special issue of Acta Crystallographica Section C: Structural Chemistry.
2. Signposting reviews on secondary bonding: halogen bonds, chalcogen bonds, pnictogen bonds, tetrel bonds, etc.
In the following sections, we have very briefly summarized the broad areas covered by reviews on each class of secondary bonding interactions. Although a comprehensive list would be desirable, accomplishing this with certainty is difficult to ensure. Given the vast number of reviews, we have focused on those published in the past decade (2013–present). There are, of course, several key reviews that precede this period. A selection of these is noted in the Introduction (Section 1). There will inevitably be reviews published that are not listed in Tables 1–5; their omission is unintentional. There are also a number of collections of articles in journals that have been compiled around this topic. A good example is the series of articles associated with the 203rd Faraday Discussion meeting on `Halogen Bonding in Supramolecular and Solid State Chemistry,' held in Ottawa, Canada, on 10–12th July, 2017 (see, for example, Clark, 2017; Brammer, 2017), which includes transcripts of the extensive discussion arising from the presented articles (Aakeröy et al., 2017a,b,c,d). Section 3 (vide infra) provides an overview of the collection of articles in the special issue of this journal, with which the present article is associated.
|
|
|
|
2.1. Reviews of halogen bonding
As noted in the Introduction (Section 1), halogen bonding was the first of the σ-hole interactions to receive renewed attention in the revival and blossoming of research over the past 25-plus years; it remains the most widely studied of these related interactions. This has led to a large number of reviews within the past ten years (Table 1) and has even resulted in the publication of a number of books focusing on halogen bonding (Cavallo et al., 2015; Kolář et al., 2015).
Reviews cover halogen bonding in the solid state, in solution and in the gas phase. A simple overview of the developing trends within these reviews reveals that, within the past decade, the focus has shifted from the general reviews that dominated the first half of the decade to reviews focusing on furthering the understanding of halogen bonding, e.g. utilizing computational input, with reviews centred on specific applications of halogen bonding becoming more prominent in the latter half of the past decade. This snapshot of the field illustrates the promise for the use of halogen bonding in a variety of applications and fields, including materials chemistry, organocatalysis and biologically/medically relevant areas. These trends towards employing halogen bonding to modify the properties of materials or the reactivity/activity of molecules are echoed in the reviews of the related interactions, alluding to the role that σ-hole interactions will play in future scientific research. Lists of reviews on chalcogen bonding, pnictogen bonding and tetrel bonding are provided in Tables 2–5.
2.2. Reviews of chalcogen bonding
In this section, a collection of reviews that are related specifically to chalcogen bonding is provided. A list of these reviews can be found in Table 2. Although these reviews focus primarily on the supramolecular and crystal engineering aspects of the chalcogen bond, areas such as drug development and biological aspects, as well as materials chemistry, are also prevalent. Furthermore, the role of chalcogen bonding in organic synthesis and catalysis is covered in several of the listed reviews. A reader unfamiliar with the topic may find the overview of chalcogen bonding by Huber and co-workers a good starting point (Vogel et al., 2019), while a general definition of the chalcogen bond has been provided through the IUPAC (International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry) nomenclature process (Aakeröy et al., 2019).
2.3. Reviews of pnictogen bonding
The reviews listed in Table 3 are those dedicated exclusively to pnictogen (also pnicogen) bonding and cover this particular σ-hole interaction mainly from a crystal engineering point of view, but also review the fundamental aspects of the pnictogen bond by summarizing articles that involve relevant computational results. To highlight some of these reviews, Varadwaj and co-workers provide four separate reviews (Varadwaj et al., 2022b,c,d,e, 2023b), each devoted to a specific atom of the pnictogen family and its respective pnictogen-bonded systems, based on crystal structures present in the Cambridge Structural Database (CSD). Furthermore, a CSD survey of coordination and organometallic compounds which involve pnictogen-bond motifs has been conducted by Mahmudov et al. (2022), while the review by Scheiner (2013b) provides a comprehensive look at the fundamental aspects of the pnictogen bond. The significance of pnictogen bonding in areas such as catalysis and biology are highlighted in reviews listed in Table 5 that focus on multiple types of σ-hole interactions.
2.4. Reviews of tetrel bonding
Similar to pnictogen bonding, the reviews of tetrel bonding listed in Table 4 concentrate largely in surveying crystallographic data using the CSD, while some of these reviews provide a comprehensive look at the characteristic features of the tetrel bond by drawing conclusions mainly from computational studies or in conjunction with experimental data. Although not a review and therefore not listed in Table 4, a recent article by Varadwaj et al. (2023a) is worth mentioning here since it proposes a definition of the tetrel bond. Some of the listed surveys look mainly at C atoms as the Lewis acidic centre, although reviews focusing on tetrel bonding involving its heavier congeners germanium, tin and especially lead are also listed. We note that the review by Laplaza et al. (2021) is placed in Table 4 rather than Table 5 since the authors place tetrel bonds in particular focus while analysing `new bonding situations' using the highlighted computational method (Laplaza et al., 2021).
2.5. Reviews that include multiple σ-hole interaction types
Associating each review strictly with a single class of interaction (i.e. halogen, chalcogen, pnictogen or tetrel bonding) is not always possible and therefore in Table 5 we provide an extended list of reviews in which two or more of these σ-hole interactions are reviewed. This list also contains reviews that compare the features of tetrel, pnictogen, chalcogen and/or halogen bonding with hydrogen bonds. Additionally, some of these reviews provide further reading on other types of noncovalent interactions beyond the σ-hole interactions introduced above, including aerogen (noble gas) bonding and triel (Group 13) bonding, as well as so-called π-hole interactions.
2.6. Other σ-hole or related interactions
Although this review and the accompanying special issue of the journal have focused on σ-hole interactions involving Group 14–17 elements in the Lewis acidic role, it has long been recognized that elements from other groups can also form analogous interactions. In most cases, these interactions are currently the subject of insufficient studies to warrant a review article. The involvement of noble gases in such secondary bonding interactions was reviewed by Alcock 50 years ago (Alcock, 1972). More recent work, under the classification of aerogen bonds has come from individual studies (e.g. Bauzá & Frontera, 2015). Interactions involving Group 13 elements as Lewis acids have been reviewed recently under the classification of triel bonds (Grabowski, 2020b). Lewis acidic behaviour, however, is already well established, i.e. typical behaviour, of Group 13 elements. The description of triel bonding for these elements relies on describing the well-established chemistry in terms of a π-hole interaction at the triel element. Analogies between the σ-hole description of interactions of Group 14–18 elements have also recently been evoked for weak interactions of Lewis bases with some transition-metal complexes of Groups 7, 8, 11 and 12 (Daolio et al., 2021a,b; Legon & Walker, 2018; Bauzá et al., 2020; Banerjee et al., 2022; Gomila & Frontera, 2022). Caution should perhaps be observed here so as not to reimagine all of d-block coordination chemistry in terms of σ-holes, but some structural and bonding analogies between weak interactions involving these d-block elements and those involving p-block elements is clearly of value. A survey of related interactions from across the s- and p-blocks, and part of the d-block has been reported by Alkorta et al. (2020).
3. The virtual special issue
The virtual special issue of this journal, which runs under the heading `Halogen, chalcogen, pnictogen and tetrel bonds: structural chemistry and beyond' was conceived as providing a snapshot of current research activity and includes 11 articles that cover a variety of aspects associated with this class of interactions. There are articles that focus on structure, bonding and bond strength, articles that investigate co-operation or competition between different classes of interactions, articles that explore the relationship between these interactions and chemical or physical properties of the compounds and materials involved, and, although all articles involve characterization by single-crystal X-ray diffraction, a number have a prominent focus on other experimental techniques or are combined with interpretation from theoretical calculations. Halogen bonding and chalcogen bonding dominate these articles, consistent with the wider literature (vide supra).
Five articles focus on different aspects of the structure, bonding and resulting properties of halogen-bonded crystals (Fig. 2). Torubaev & Skabitskiy (2022; see also Perkins et al., 2012) use X-ray crystallography to study the effect on C—I⋯N halogen bonds of the hydridization at the C atom across the series C2I2·DABCO, C2H2I2·DABCO and C2H4I2·DABCO (DABCO is 1,4-diazabicyclo[2.2.2]octane), demonstrating that, in these linear halogen-bonded assemblies, halogen-bond lengths (I⋯N) follow the trend C(sp)—I⋯N < C(sp2)—I⋯N < C(sp3)—I⋯N. The crystallographic results are supported by calculations of electrostatic potentials. Blockhaus & Sünkel (2022) report the synthesis of a series of highly brominated ferrocenes [C10H10–nBrnFe], with n = 4–9. The crystal structures of some of these compounds are described and exhibit C—H⋯Br hydrogen bonds, C—Br⋯Br—C interactions, some of which are halogen bonds, and C—Br⋯π halogen bonds. These compounds are discussed in the broader context of other polybromoferrocenes and other polyhaloferrocenes, and analysed using Hirshfeld surface representations and by intermolecular energy calculations. Wang, Wu and Jin report halogen-bonded cocrystals of di- and triiodoperfluorobenzenes with a flexible thioether containing a strong halogen-bond acceptor pyridyl N-oxide group (Wang et al., 2023). Accommodation of the halogen-bond donor species in the cocrystals involves a change in conformation of the flexible NPTO molecule (NPTO is 2-{[(naphthalen-2-yl)methyl]sulfanyl}pyridine 1-oxide) upon formation of C—I⋯O halogen bonds and π-stacking interactions between the electron-rich naphthyl groups of the NPTO molecule and the electron-poor iodoperfluorobenzenes, which are interpreted in terms of a π-hole description. The crystallographic studies are complemented by quantum chemical calculations. Saha and co-workers investigate the relationship between physical properties and halogen-bond strength. Specifically, they have examined the propensity for single crystals of 4-halobenzenes to bend (Veluthaparambath et al., 2022). In their article, they correlate the of 4-iodobenzonitrile and its brittle behaviour, which contrasts with the chloro and bromo analogues that exhibit elastic bending and plastic bending, respectively. The study is supported by density functional theory (DFT) calculations and a statistical analysis of C—X⋯N≡C halogen-bond geometries using the CSD. Finally, Mosquera et al. (2023) link halogen bonding and reactivity in their study of pyridine-4-thiol (4-mercaptopyridine). Cocrystallization with the ditopic halogen-bond donor 1,4-diiodotetrafluorobenzene leads to of the thiol to give the zwitterionic analogue with thiolate and pyridinium groups. This zwitterion employs the sulfur as the halogen-bond acceptor (C—I⋯S, RIS = 0.84) in the formation of a 2:1 cocrystal (C5H5NS·C6F4I2), in which these trimolecular supermolecules are further linked via N—H⋯S hydrogen bonds. When the cocrystallization is pursued on a larger scale, with stirring, the solution containing the two cocrystal formers leads to a nucleophilic that results in the chloro groups of the CH2Cl2 solvent being replaced by the formation of new C—S bonds to give the zwitterionic form of 4-mercaptopyridine. The resulting [CH2(SC4H5N)2]2+ dication crystallizes as its dichloride salt and exhibits C—S⋯Cl chalcogen bonds. Stabilization of the zwitterionic form of 4-mercaptopyridine in solution by halogen bonding to C6F4I2 is suggested as enabling the sulfur to serve as a better in its reaction with CH2Cl2.
Three articles focus on the competition or co-operation of halogen bonds with other σ-hole class (secondary bonding) interactions (Fig. 3). Pennington and co-workers report a series of 18 cocrystals between heterocyclic thiones based on benzimidazole, benzoxazole or benzothiazole with a variety of iodoperfluorobenzenes or tetraiodoethene (Watts et al., 2022), leading to structures that are rich in directional intermolecular interactions. Persistent N—H⋯S hydrogen bonding leads to two-dimensional (2D) tape motifs or dimers depending on the number of N—H groups available. These units are then further linked by C—I⋯S and/or C—I⋯I halogen bonds and occasionally by C=S⋯I—C chalcogen bonds. Aakeröy and co-workers have designed a library of molecules based upon 1,3,4-chalcogenadiazoles that carry a halogen substituent at the 2-position of the five-memberered ring and a 4-halophenyl group attached at the 5-position of the same ring (De Silva et al., 2022). This family of molecules contains two different halogen-bond donor groups, the strengths of which differ and are tuneable, as indicated by electrostatic potential calculations of their associated σ-holes. The five-membered ring provides a chalcogen-bond donor site and acceptor sites for both halogen and chalcogen bonds at the ring N atoms. The molecules are linked into 2D assemblies, propagated along the c axis by halogen bonds (C—I⋯I, C—Br⋯Br and C—Br⋯I) and along the a axis via bifurcated chalcogen bonds involving both ring N atoms in the acceptor role. This outcome contrasts with a prediction based simply on σ-hole electrostatic potentials, which would suggest that the strongest interaction would be halogen bonding to the ring N atom (position-3). The analysis of the interactions is supported by Hirshfeld surfaces, fingerprint plots and energy framework calculations (Spackman & Jayatilaka, 2009; Spackman et al., 2021), the latter indicating that the observed chalcogen bonds make a larger electrostatic contribution to the lattice energy than the C—X⋯X halogen bonds. Chopra, Hathwar and co-workers report the structure of the organic salt 2,4,6-trimethylpyrylium tetrafluoroborate, C5H2Me3O+·BF4−, and present an extensive computational analysis of the short intermolecular contacts to provide a description of the interaction type (Mandal et al., 2022). Among the interactions indicated by the topological analysis of the calculated electron density and accompanying distributed atomic polarizability calculations are B—F⋯O interactions. Although not clearly described as either halogen or chalcogen bonds, NBO (natural bond orbital) analysis indicates interaction of filled F(lone pair) with O—C(π*) orbitals. B—F⋯C interactions involving the ortho-methyl groups of the pyrylium ring and involving ortho ring C atoms are described as tetrel bonds.
Three articles focus solely on chalcogen bonds (Fig. 4) and reflect the growing importance and interest in this class of interactions, alongside the more extensively studied halogen bond. Huber and co-workers report the synthesis and crystal structures of a set of four 1,3-bis(benzimidazoliumyl)benzene-based compounds designed for two-point binding of suitable Lewis bases via chalcogen bonds (Steinke et al., 2023). This class of compounds and related triazolium analogues have been used successfully as catalysts (with chalcogens Ch = S, Se or Te) in several benchmark reactions (Wonner et al., 2017, 2019a,b). The crystal structures reported are of the methylimidazolium analogues of the more soluble octylimidazolium catalysts, which proved too difficult to crystallize but exhibited some unexplained trends in catalytic behaviour as a function of chalcogen choice. The current study demonstrates in most cases two-point chalcogen-bond binding of the CF3SO3− counter-ion involving one or two anion oxygen sites and exhibits single chalcogen bonds to the anion in others. These interactions are supported by other interactions, such as anion–π interactions, in some cases. The crystallographic studies are complemented by DFT calculations of molecular electrostatic potentials. White and co-workers report a study of the pyridin-3-yl derivative of the selenium-containing drug ebselen, 1 (Xu et al., 2023), and its methylpyridinium iodide salt (1-Me+I−) and tosylate salt (1-Me+CH3C6H4SO3−·3H2O). The of the parent drug (Dupont et al., 1990) and a subsequent charge–density study (Thomas et al., 2015) revealed a short and strong C—Se⋯O=C chalcogen bond [Se⋯O = 2.522 (1) Å] accompanied by an IR stretching frequency shift [Δν(CO) ≃ 71 cm−1]. The newly reported structures contain chalcogen bonds: C—Se⋯N and C—Se⋯O=C in 1, C—Se⋯O=C in 1-Me+CH3C6H4SO3−·3H2O and a very strong interaction that approximates the formation of an Se—I bond as a hypervalent Se. In 1, the C—Se⋯N interaction is much shorter than C—Se⋯O=C. In each structure, the chalcogen bonding is stronger trans to the N—Se than trans to the C—Se and leads to a significant lengthening of this bond, consistent with charge transfer to the N—Se σ* orbital and correlating with the strength of the chalcogen bond. An experimental charge–density study of 1 enables a more detailed analysis of the chalcogen bonding within the QTAIM (quantum theory of atoms in molecules) framework (Bader, 1991). This analysis indicates that the C—Se⋯N chalcogen bond exhibits significant electron sharing (albeit with a bond BCP, consistent with a closed-shell interaction), whereas the weaker C—Se⋯O=C chalcogen bond exhibits characteristics of a largely electrostatic interaction. Bryce and co-workers have used single-crystal and powder X-ray diffraction alongside 77Se/125Te magic-angle spinning solid-state NMR spectroscopy in characterizing chalcogen bonding in cocrystals of 3,4-dicyano-1,2,5-chalcogenodiazoles (Ch = Se and Te) with hydroquinone or chloride as the chalcogen-bond acceptor (Nag et al., 2022). The three crystal structures reported each show chalcogen-bond formation trans to both N—Ch covalent bonds [N—Se⋯N, N—Se⋯O, N—Te⋯Cl and N—Te⋯π(phenyl)]. All are relatively strong (RSeN = 0.86, RSeO = 0.88 and RTeCl = 0.69–0.80; N—Ch⋯A = 168–175°). NMR data demonstrate the sensitivity of 125Te values to N—Te⋯A chalcogen bonds and are consistent with earlier studies of cocrystals of dicyano-1,2,5-tellurodiazole with a variety of chalcogen-bond acceptors (A) (Kumar et al., 2020). The 3,4-dicyano-1,2,5-selenodiazole–hydroquinone cocrystal shows 77Se tensor values indicative of retention of self-complementary N—Se⋯N chalcogen bonds.
4. Conclusions
In this review our aim has been to summarize the current status of halogen bonds and other σ-hole interactions involving p-block elements in Lewis acidic roles, notably chalcogen bonds, pnictogen bonds and tetrel bonds. Our approach has been to tabulate and briefly discuss and classify review articles written mostly since 2013 that cover this topic. The present review also serves as an overview and introduction to the special issue in this journal comprising 11 articles and entitled `Halogen, chalcogen, pnictogen and tetrel bonds: structural chemistry and beyond,' which presents a snapshot of some of the current research activities in the field.
5. Note (see Introduction)
The two early 19th century articles by Colin, entitled `Sur Quelques Combinaisons de l'Iode' (Colin, 1814) and `Memoire sur les Combinaisons de l'Iode avec Substances Vegetales et Animales' (Colin & Gaultier de Claubry, 1814), which are frequently cited as the earliest examples of halogen bonding, are sometimes incorrectly cited in the literature. The principal author, Jean-Jacques Colin, is listed as M. Colin in the former article, but this is an abbreviation for Monsieur Colin. In the latter article, the authors are listed as MM. Colin et H. Gaultier de Claubry, but this is an abbreviation for Messieurs Colin and H. Gaultier de Claubry.
Acknowledgements
LB and TMR acknowledge funding via the Leverhulme Trust and AP thanks the Academy of Finland for a postdoctoral fellowship that enabled an extended collaborative visit to University of Sheffield.
Funding information
Funding for this research was provided by: Academy of Finland (decision No. 315911 to A. Peuronen).
References
Aakeröy, C. B., Alavi, S., Beer, P. D., Beyeh, N. K., Brammer, L., Bryce, D. L., Clark, T., Cottrell, S. J., Del Bene, J. E., Edwards, A. J., Esterhuysen, C., Friščić, T., Guru Row, T. N., Kennepohl, P., Lloyd, G. O., Roy Choudhury, A., Scheiner, S., Southern, S. A., Taylor, M. S., Tsuzuki, S. & Vargas-Baca, I. (2017a). Faraday Discuss. 203, 227–244. PubMed Google Scholar
Aakeröy, C. B., Alavi, S., Beyeh, N. K., Brammer, L., Branca, M., Bryce, D. L., Christopherson, J.-C., Clark, T., Cottrell, S. J., Del Bene, J. E., Dichiarante, V., Edwards, A. J., Erdelyi, M., Esterhuysen, C., Fourmigué, M., Friščić, T., Kennepohl, P., Legon, A. C., Lloyd, G. O., Murray, J. S., Mustoe, C. L., Pennington, W. T., Rosokha, S. V., Roy Choudhury, A., Scheiner, S., Szell, P. M. J., Taylor, M. S. & Tsuzuki, S. (2017b). Faraday Discuss. 203, 459–483. PubMed Google Scholar
Aakeröy, C. B., Alavi, S., Brammer, L., Bryce, D. L., Clark, T., Del Bene, J. E., Edwards, A. J., Esterhuysen, C., Guru Row, T. N., Kennepohl, P., Legon, A. C., Lloyd, G. O., Murray, J. S., Pennington, W. T., Politzer, P., Riley, K. E., Rosokha, S. V., Scheiner, S., Tsuzuki, S. & Vargas-Baca, I. (2017c). Faraday Discuss. 203, 131–163. Google Scholar
Aakeröy, C. B., Beer, P. D., Beyeh, N. K., Brammer, L., Branca, M., Bryce, D. L., Del Bene, J. E., Edwards, A. J., Erdelyi, M., Esterhuysen, C., Fourmigué, M., Kennepohl, P., Lee, L. M., Mosquera, M. E. G., Murray, J. S., Mustoe, C. L., Pennington, W. T., Politzer, P., Riley, K. E., Rosokha, S. V., Scheiner, S., Taylor, M. S., Tsuzuki, S., Vargas-Baca, I. & Xu, Y. (2017d). Faraday Discuss. 203, 347–370. Google Scholar
Aakeröy, C. B., Bryce, D. L., Desiraju, G. R., Frontera, A., Legon, A. C., Nicotra, F., Rissanen, K., Scheiner, S., Terraneo, G., Metrangolo, P. & Resnati, G. (2019). Pure Appl. Chem. 91, 1889–1892. Google Scholar
Alcock, N. W. (1972). Adv. Inorg. Chem. Radiochem. 15, 1–58. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Alkorta, I., Elguero, J. & Frontera, A. (2020). Crystals, 10, 180. Web of Science CrossRef Google Scholar
Bader, R. F. W. (1991). Chem. Rev. 91, 893–928. CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Bamberger, J., Ostler, F. & Mancheño, O. G. (2019). ChemCatChem, 11, 5198–5211. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Banerjee, A., Chowdhury, D., Gomila, R. M. & Chattopadhyay, S. (2022). Polyhedron, 216, 115670. CrossRef Google Scholar
Bartashevich, E. V., Grigoreva, E. A., Yushina, I. D., Bulatova, L. M. & Tsirelson, V. G. (2017). Russ. Chem. Bull. 66, 1345–1356. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Bartashevich, E. V. & Tsirelson, V. G. (2014). Russ. Chem. Rev. 83, 1181–1203. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Bauzá, A., Alkorta, I., Elguero, J., Mooibroek, T. J. & Frontera, A. (2020). Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 59, 17482–17487. Google Scholar
Bauzá, A., Alkorta, I., Frontera, A. & Elguero, J. (2013). J. Chem. Theory Comput. 9, 5201–5210. PubMed Google Scholar
Bauzá, A. & Frontera, A. (2015). Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 54, 7340–7343. Google Scholar
Bauzá, A., Mooibroek, T. J. & Frontera, A. (2015). ChemPhysChem, 16, 2496–2517. Web of Science PubMed Google Scholar
Bauzá, A., Mooibroek, T. J. & Frontera, A. (2016). Chem. Rec. 16, 473–487. Web of Science PubMed Google Scholar
Bauzá, A., Seth, S. K. & Frontera, A. (2019). Coord. Chem. Rev. 384, 107–125. Google Scholar
Beale, T. M., Chudzinski, M. G., Sarwar, M. G. & Taylor, M. S. (2013). Chem. Soc. Rev. 42, 1667–1680. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Benesi, H. A. & Hildebrand, J. H. (1948). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 70, 2832–2833. CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Bent, H. A. (1968). Chem. Rev. 68, 587–648. CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Berger, G., Soubhye, J. & Meyer, F. (2015). Polym. Chem. 6, 3559–3580. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Bertani, R., Sgarbossa, P., Venzo, A., Lelj, F., Amati, M., Resnati, G., Pilati, T., Metrangolo, P. & Terraneo, G. (2010). Coord. Chem. Rev. 254, 677–695. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Biot, N. & Bonifazi, D. (2020). Coord. Chem. Rev. 413, 213243. CrossRef Google Scholar
Blockhaus, T. & Sünkel, K. (2022). Acta Cryst. C78, 578–590. CSD CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Brammer, L. (2017). Faraday Discuss. 203, 485–507. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Brammer, L., Mínguez Espallargas, G. & Libri, S. (2008). CrystEngComm, 10, 1712–1727. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Breugst, M. & Koenig, J. J. (2020). Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2020, 5473–5487. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Breugst, M., von der Heiden, D. & Schmauck, J. (2017). Synthesis, 49, 3224–3236. CAS Google Scholar
Catalano, L., Cavallo, G., Metrangolo, P., Resnati, G. & Terraneo, G. (2016). Hypervalent Iodine Chemistry, edited by T. Wirth, pp. 289–309. Cham, Switzerland: Springer. Google Scholar
Cavallo, G., Metrangolo, P., Milani, R., Pilati, T., Priimagi, A., Resnati, G. & Terraneo, G. (2016). Chem. Rev. 116, 2478–2601. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Cavallo, G., Metrangolo, P., Pilati, T., Resnati, G., Sansotera, M. & Terraneo, G. (2010). Chem. Soc. Rev. 39, 3772–3783. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Cavallo, G., Metrangolo, P., Pilati, T., Resnati, G., Terraneo, G., Politzer, P., Murray, J. S., Clark, T., Hill, J. G., Legon, A. C., Tew, D. P., Walker, N. R., Herrebout, W., Aakeröy, C. B., Spartz, C. L., Bryce, D. L., Viger-Gravel, J., Vargas Jentzsch, A., Matile, S. & Ho, P. S. (2015). In Halogen Bonding I: Impact on Materials Chemistry and Life Sciences. Cham, Switzerland: Springer. Google Scholar
Chen, S., Yin, H., Wu, J.-J., Lin, H. & Wang, X.-D. (2020). Sci. China Mater. 63, 1613–1630. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Christopherson, J. C., Topić, F., Barrett, C. J. & Friščić, T. (2018). Cryst. Growth Des. 18, 1245–1259. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Ciancaleoni, G. (2017). Magnetochemistry, 3, 30. Google Scholar
Ciancaleoni, G., Nunzi, F. & Belpassi, L. (2020). Molecules, 25, 300. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Clark, T. (2017). Faraday Discuss. 203, 9–27. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Clark, T., Hennemann, M., Murray, J. S. & Politzer, P. (2007). J. Mol. Model. 13, 291–296. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Colin, J.-J. (1814). Ann. Chim. pp. 252–272. Google Scholar
Colin, J.-J. & Gaultier de Claubry, H. (1814). Ann. Chim. 90, 87–100. Google Scholar
Corradi, E., Meille, S. V., Messina, M. T., Metrangolo, P. & Resnati, G. (2000). Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 39, 1782–1786. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Costa, P. J., Nunes, R. & Vila-Viçosa, D. (2019). Expert Opin. Drug. Discov. 14, 805–820. CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Crabtree, R. H. (2017). Chem. Soc. Rev. 46, 1720–1729. CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Czarny, R. S., Ho, A. N. & Shing Ho, P. (2021). Chem. Rec. 21, 1240–1251. CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Daolio, A., Pizzi, A., Calabrese, M., Terraneo, G., Bordignon, S., Frontera, A. & Resnati, G. (2021a). Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 60, 20723–20727. Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Daolio, A., Pizzi, A., Terraneo, G., Frontera, A. & Resnati, G. (2021b). ChemPhysChem, 22, 2281–2285. Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Daolio, A., Scilabra, P., Terraneo, G. & Resnati, G. (2020). Coord. Chem. Rev. 413, 213265. CrossRef Google Scholar
der Heiden, D. von, Vanderkooy, A. & Erdélyi, M. (2020). Coord. Chem. Rev. 407, 213147. Google Scholar
Deringer, V. L., George, J., Dronskowski, R. & Englert, U. (2017). Acc. Chem. Res. 50, 1231–1239. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
De Silva, V., Magueres, P. L., Averkiev, B. B. & Aakeröy, C. B. (2022). Acta Cryst. C78, 716–721. CSD CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Devadiga, D. & Ahipa, T. N. (2021). J. Mol. Liq. 333, 115961. CrossRef Google Scholar
Ding, X. H., Chang, Y. Z., Ou, C. J., Lin, J. Y., Xie, L. H. & Huang, W. (2020). Natl. Sci. Rev. 7, 1906–1932. CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Ding, X. H., Ou, C. J., Wang, S., Xie, L. H., Lin, J. Y., Wang, J. P. & Huang, W. (2017). CrystEngComm, 19, 5504–5521. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Dupont, L., Dideberg, O. & Jacquemin, P. (1990). Acta Cryst. C46, 484–486. CSD CrossRef CAS Web of Science IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Erdélyi, M. (2012). Chem. Soc. Rev. 41, 3547–3557. Web of Science PubMed Google Scholar
Evans, N. H. & Beer, P. D. (2014). Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 53, 11716–11754. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Fave, C. & Schöllhorn, B. (2019). Curr. Opin. Electrochem. 15, 89–96. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Fourmigué, M. (2009). Curr. Opin. Solid State Mater. Sci. 13, 36–45. Google Scholar
Fourmigué, M. & Dhaka, A. (2020). Coord. Chem. Rev. 403, 213084. Google Scholar
Frontera, A. (2020). C J. Carbon Res. 6, 60. CrossRef Google Scholar
Frontera, A. & Bauzá, A. (2021). Crystals, 11, 1205. CrossRef Google Scholar
Frontera, A. & Bauza, A. (2021). Int. J. Mol. Sci. 22, 12550. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Frontera, A. & Bauza, A. (2022). Int. J. Mol. Sci. 23, 4188. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Gilday, L. C., Robinson, S. W., Barendt, T. A., Langton, M. J., Mullaney, B. R. & Beer, P. D. (2015). Chem. Rev. 115, 7118–7195. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Gomila, R. M. & Frontera, A. (2022). Molecules, 27, 6597. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Govindaraj, V., Ungati, H., Jakka, S. R., Bose, S. & Mugesh, G. (2019). Chem. Eur. J. 25, 11180–11192. CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Grabowski, S. J. (2019). Struct. Chem. 30, 1141–1152. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Grabowski, S. J. (2020a). Molecules, 25, 4668. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Grabowski, S. J. (2020b). Coord. Chem. Rev. 407, 213171. CrossRef Google Scholar
Grabowski, S. J. (2021). Molecules, 26, 4939. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Groom, C. R., Bruno, I. J., Lightfoot, M. P. & Ward, S. C. (2016). Acta Cryst. B72, 171–179. Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Gropp, C., Quigley, B. L. & Diederich, F. (2018). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 140, 2705–2717. CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Hakkert, S. B. & Erdélyi, M. (2015). J. Phys. Org. Chem. 28, 226–233. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Haque, A., Alenezi, K. M., Khan, M. S., Wong, W. Y. & Raithby, P. R. (2023). Chem. Soc. Rev. 52, 454–472. CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Hassel, O. & Hvoslef, J. (1954). Acta Chem. Scand. 8, 873. CSD CrossRef Web of Science Google Scholar
Hein, R. & Beer, P. D. (2022). Chem. Sci. 13, 7098–7125. CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Ho, P. C., Wang, J. Z., Meloni, F. & Vargas-Baca, I. (2020). Coord. Chem. Rev. 422, 213464. Web of Science CrossRef Google Scholar
Ivanov, D. M., Bokach, N. A. Yu., Kukushkin, V. & Frontera, A. (2022). Chem. Eur. J. 28, e202103173. PubMed Google Scholar
Jaźwiński, J. (2021). Annual Reports on NMR Spectroscopy, Vol. 104, pp. 1–73. New York: Academic Press. Google Scholar
Jena, S., Dutta, J., Tulsiyan, K. D., Sahu, A. K., Choudhury, S. S. & Biswal, H. S. (2022). Chem. Soc. Rev. 51, 4261–4286. CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
John, E. A., Massena, C. J. & Berryman, O. B. (2020). Chem. Rev. 120, 2759–2782. CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Juanes, M., Saragi, R. T., Caminati, W. & Lesarri, A. (2019). Chem. Eur. J. 25, 11402–11411. CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Kaasik, M. & Kanger, T. (2020). Front. Chem. 8, 1–18. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Kampes, R., Zechel, S., Hager, M. D. & Schubert, U. S. (2021). Chem. Sci. 12, 9275–9286. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Karir, G. & Jemmis, E. D. (2020). J. Indian Inst. Sci. 100, 127–133. CrossRef Google Scholar
Kolář, M. H., Deepa, P., Ajani, H., Pecina, A., Hobza, P., Taylor, M. S., Carlsson, A. C. C., Veiga, A. X., Erdélyi, M., Rissanen, K., Haukka, M., Fourmigué, M., Lieffrig, J., Pang, X., Jin, W. J., Saccone, M., Cavallo, G., Metrangolo, P., Resnati, G., Priimagi, A., Schindler, S. & Huber, S. M. (2015). In Halogen Bonding II: Impact on Materials Chemistry and Life Sciences. Cham, Switzerland: Springer. Google Scholar
Kolář, M. H. & Hobza, P. (2016). Chem. Rev. 116, 5155–5187. Web of Science PubMed Google Scholar
Kumar, V., Xu, Y. & Bryce, D. L. (2020). Chem. Eur. J. 26, 3275–3286. CSD CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Laplaza, R., Peccati, F. A., Boto, R., Quan, C., Carbone, A., Piquemal, J. P., Maday, Y. & Contreras–García, J. (2021). WIREs Comput. Mol. Sci. 11, e1497. Google Scholar
Lee, S. M., Heard, P. J. & Tiekink, E. R. T. (2018). Coord. Chem. Rev. 375, 410–423. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Legon, A. (2020). J. Indian Inst. Sci. 100, 191–202. CrossRef Google Scholar
Legon, A. C. (1999). Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 38, 2686–2714. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Legon, A. C. & Walker, N. R. (2018). Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 20, 19332–19338. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Li, B., Zang, S.-Q., Wang, L.-Y. & Mak, T. C. W. (2016). Coord. Chem. Rev. 308, 1–21. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Lim, J. Y. C. & Beer, P. D. (2018). Chem, 4, 731–783. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Lorpaiboon, W. & Bovonsombat, P. (2021). Org. Biomol. Chem. 19, 7518–7534. CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Ma, Y. X., Yin, H. L., Yang, J., Lin, H. T., Chen, S. H., Zhou, J., Zhuo, S. P. & Wang, X. D. (2022). Adv. Opt. Mater. 2022, 2201000. CrossRef Google Scholar
Mahmudov, K. T., Gurbanov, A. V., Aliyeva, V. A., Guedes da Silva, M. F. C., Resnati, G. & Pombeiro, A. J. L. (2022). Coord. Chem. Rev. 464, 214556. Web of Science CrossRef Google Scholar
Mahmudov, K. T., Gurbanov, A. V., Guseinov, F. I. & Guedes da Silva, M. F. C. (2019). Coord. Chem. Rev. 387, 32–46. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Mahmudov, K. T., Huseynov, F. E., Aliyeva, V. A., Guedes da Silva, M. F. C. & Pombeiro, A. J. L. (2021). Chem. Eur. J. 27, 14370–14389. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Mahmudov, K. T., Kopylovich, M. N., Guedes da Silva, M. F. C. & Pombeiro, A. J. L. (2017a). Coord. Chem. Rev. 345, 54–72. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Mahmudov, K. T., Kopylovich, M. N., Guedes da Silva, M. F. C. & Pombeiro, A. J. L. (2017b). Dalton Trans. 46, 10121–10138. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Mandal, K., Sarkar, S., Ghosh, P., Hathwar, V. R. & Chopra, D. (2022). Acta Cryst. C78, 597–605. CSD CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Marsan, E. S. & Bayse, C. A. (2020). Molecules, 25, 1–16. CrossRef Google Scholar
Mendez, L., Henriquez, G., Sirimulla, S. & Narayan, M. (2017). Molecules, 22, 22–25. Web of Science CrossRef Google Scholar
Metrangolo, P., Canil, L., Abate, A., Terraneo, G. & Cavallo, G. (2022). Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 61, e202114793. CrossRef Google Scholar
Metrangolo, P., Neukirch, H., Pilati, T. & Resnati, G. (2005). Acc. Chem. Res. 38, 386–395. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Meyer, F. & Dubois, P. (2013). CrystEngComm, 15, 3058–3071. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Molina, P., Zapata, F. & Caballero, A. (2017). Chem. Rev. 117, 9907–9972. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Mondal, S., Giri, D. & Mugesh, G. (2020a). J. Indian Inst. Sci. 100, 231–247. CrossRef Google Scholar
Mondal, S., Manna, D., Raja, K. & Mugesh, G. (2020b). ChemBioChem, 21, 911–923. CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Montaña, Á. M. (2017). ChemistrySelect, 2, 9094–9112. Google Scholar
Mosquera, M. E. G., Dortez, S., Fernández-Palacio, F. & Gómez-Sal, P. (2023). Acta Cryst. C79, 112–117. CSD CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Mukherjee, A., Tothadi, S. & Desiraju, G. R. (2014). Acc. Chem. Res. 47, 2514–2524. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Mulliken, R. S. (1950). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 72, 600–608. CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Murray, J. S. & Politzer, P. (2017). WIREs Comput. Mol. Sci. 7, e1326. Google Scholar
Nag, T., Ovens, J. S. & Bryce, D. L. (2022). Acta Cryst. C78, 517–523. CSD CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Nemec, V., Lisac, K., Bedeković, N., Fotović, L., Stilinović, V. & Cinčić, D. (2021). CrystEngComm, 23, 3063–3083. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Newberry, R. W. & Raines, R. T. (2019). ACS Chem. Biol. 14, 1677–1686. CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Pancholi, J. & Beer, P. D. (2020). Coord. Chem. Rev. 416, 213281. Web of Science CrossRef Google Scholar
Parisini, E., Metrangolo, P., Pilati, T., Resnati, G. & Terraneo, G. (2011). Chem. Soc. Rev. 40, 2267–2278. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Peluso, P. & Chankvetadze, B. (2022). Chem. Rev. 122, 13235–13400. CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Peluso, P. & Mamane, V. (2022). Molecules, 27, 4625. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Perkins, C., Libri, S., Adams, H. & Brammer, L. (2012). CrystEngComm, 14, 3033–3038. Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Persch, E., Dumele, O. & Diederich, F. (2015). Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 54, 3290–3327. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Politzer, P. & Murray, J. S. (2020). ChemPhysChem, 21, 579–588. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Politzer, P., Murray, J. S. & Clark, T. (2013). Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 15, 11178–11189. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Politzer, P., Murray, J. S. & Clark, T. (2014). Top. Curr. Chem. 358, 19–42. Web of Science CrossRef Google Scholar
Poznański, J., Winiewska, M., Czapinska, H., Poznańska, A. & Shugar, D. (2016). Acta Biochim. Pol. 63, 203–214. PubMed Google Scholar
Pramanik, S. & Chopra, D. (2020). J. Indian Inst. Sci. 100, 43–59. Web of Science CrossRef Google Scholar
Priimagi, A., Cavallo, G., Metrangolo, P. & Resnati, G. (2013). Acc. Chem. Res. 46, 2686–2695. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Puzzarini, C., Spada, L., Alessandrini, S. & Barone, V. (2020). J. Phys. Condens. Matter, 32, 343002. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Riel, A. M. S., Rowe, R. K., Ho, E. N., Carlsson, A. C. C., Rappé, A. K., Berryman, O. B. & Ho, P. S. (2019). Acc. Chem. Res. 52, 2870–2880. CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Rissanen, K. (2008). CrystEngComm, 10, 1107–1113. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Rissanen, K. (2017). Chem. Soc. Rev. 46, 2638–2648. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Row, T. N. G. (2020). J. Indian Inst. Sci. 100, 203–220. CrossRef Google Scholar
Saccone, M. & Catalano, L. (2019). J. Phys. Chem. B, 123, 9281–9290. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Saha, S., Mishra, M. K., Reddy, C. M. & Desiraju, G. R. (2018). Acc. Chem. Res. 51, 2957–2967. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Savastano, M. (2021). Dalton Trans. 50, 1142–1165. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Scheiner, S. (2013a). Int. J. Quantum Chem. 113, 1609–1620. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Scheiner, S. (2013b). Acc. Chem. Res. 46, 280–288. CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Scheiner, S. (2019). Struct. Chem. 30, 1119–1128. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Scheiner, S. (2020). J. Indian Inst. Sci. 100, 61–76. CrossRef Google Scholar
Scheiner, S. (2021). CrystEngComm, 23, 6821–6837. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Scheiner, S., Michalczyk, M. & Zierkiewicz, W. (2020). Coord. Chem. Rev. 405, 213136. Web of Science CrossRef Google Scholar
Scholfield, M. R., Zanden, C. M. V., Carter, M. & Ho, P. S. (2013). Protein Sci. 22, 139–152. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Scilabra, P., Kumar, V., Ursini, M. & Resnati, G. (2018). J. Mol. Model. 24, 37. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Scilabra, P., Terraneo, G. & Resnati, G. (2017). J. Fluor. Chem. 203, 62–74. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Scilabra, P., Terraneo, G. & Resnati, G. (2019). Acc. Chem. Res. 52, 1313–1324. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Selvakumar, K. & Singh, H. B. (2018). Chem. Sci. 9, 7027–7042. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Sharber, S. A., Mullin, W. J. & Thomas, S. W. (2021). Chem. Mater. 33, 6640–6661. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Shukla, R. & Chopra, D. (2021). Curr. Sci. 120, 1848–1853. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Spackman, M. A. & Jayatilaka, D. (2009). CrystEngComm, 11, 19–32. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Spackman, P. R., Turner, M. J., McKinnon, J. J., Wolff, S. K., Grimwood, D. J., Jayatilaka, D. & Spackman, M. A. (2021). J. Appl. Cryst. 54, 1006–1011. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Steinke, T., Engelage, E. & Huber, S. M. (2023). Acta Cryst. C79, 26–35. CSD CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Strakova, K., Assies, L., Goujon, A., Piazzolla, F., Humeniuk, H. V. & Matile, S. (2019). Chem. Rev. 119, 10977–11005. CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Tanii, S. (2020). J. Synth. Org. Chem. Jpn, 78, 894–895. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Tarannam, N., Shukla, R. & Kozuch, S. (2021). Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 23, 19948–19963. CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Taylor, M. S. (2020). Coord. Chem. Rev. 413, 213270. CrossRef Google Scholar
Taylor, R. & Wood, P. A. (2019). Chem. Rev. 119, 9427–9477. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Tepper, R. & Schubert, U. S. (2018). Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 57, 6004–6016. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Teyssandier, J., Mali, K. S. & De Feyter, S. (2020). ChemistryOpen, 9, 225–241. CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Thomas, S. P., Dikundwar, A. G., Sarkar, S., Pavan, M. S., Pal, R., Hathwar, V. R. & Row, T. N. G. (2022). Molecules, 27, 3690. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Thomas, S. P., Satheeshkumar, K., Mugesh, G. & Guru Row, T. N. (2015). Chem. Eur. J. 21, 6793–6800. Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Tiekink, E. R. T. (2017). Coord. Chem. Rev. 345, 209–228. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Tiekink, E. R. T. (2020). Crystals, 10, 503. CrossRef Google Scholar
Tiekink, E. R. T. (2021a). Crystals, 11, 433. CrossRef Google Scholar
Tiekink, E. R. T. (2021b). Coord. Chem. Rev. 443, 214031. CrossRef Google Scholar
Tiekink, E. R. T. (2021c). Coord. Chem. Rev. 427, 213586. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Tiekink, E. R. T. (2022). Coord. Chem. Rev. 457, 214397. CrossRef Google Scholar
Torubaev, Y. & Skabitskiy, I. (2022). Acta Cryst. C78, 591–596. CSD CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Troff, R. W., Mäkelä, T., Topić, F., Valkonen, A., Raatikainen, K. & Rissanen, K. (2013). Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2013, 1617–1637. Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Turunen, L. & Erdélyi, M. (2020). Chem. Soc. Rev. 49, 2688–2700. CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Varadwaj, A., Varadwaj, P. R., Marques, H. M. & Yamashita, K. (2022a). Int. J. Mol. Sci. 23, 8816. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Varadwaj, A., Varadwaj, P. R., Marques, H. M. & Yamashita, K. (2022b). Molecules, 27, 80–110. Google Scholar
Varadwaj, A., Varadwaj, P. R., Marques, H. M. & Yamashita, K. (2022c). Int. J. Mol. Sci. 23, 4674. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Varadwaj, P. R., Varadwaj, A., Marques, H. & Yamashita, K. (2023b). CrystEngComm, 25, 1038–1052. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Varadwaj, P. R., Varadwaj, A. & Marques, H. M. (2019). Inorganics, 7, 11–17. CrossRef Google Scholar
Varadwaj, P. R., Varadwaj, A., Marques, H. M. & Yamashita, K. (2022d). Compounds, 2, 80–110. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Varadwaj, P. R., Varadwaj, A., Marques, H. M. & Yamashita, K. (2022e). Molecules, 27, 1487. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Varadwaj, P. R., Varadwaj, A., Marques, H. M. & Yamashita, K. (2023a). CrystEngComm, 25, 1411–1423. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Vargas Jentzsch, A., Hennig, A., Mareda, J. & Matile, S. (2013). Acc. Chem. Res. 46, 2791–2800. CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Veluthaparambath, R. V. P., Krishna G, V., Pancharatna, P. D. & Saha, B. K. (2022). Acta Cryst. C78, 693–701. CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Vogel, L., Wonner, P. & Huber, S. M. (2019). Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 58, 1880–1891. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Wang, H., Wang, W. & Jin, W. J. (2016). Chem. Rev. 116, 5072–5104. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Wang, H., Wu, W. X. & Jin, W. J. (2023). Acta Cryst. C79, 36–42. CSD CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Wang, W., Zhang, Y. & Jin, W. J. (2020a). Coord. Chem. Rev. 404, 213107. CrossRef Google Scholar
Wang, Y., Miao, X. & Deng, W. (2020b). Crystals, 10, 1–24. CAS Google Scholar
Watts, S., Peloquin, A. J., Bandara, M., McMillen, C. D. & Pennington, W. T. (2022). Acta Cryst. C78, 702–715. CSD CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Wolters, L. P., Schyman, P., Pavan, M. J., Jorgensen, W. L., Bickelhaupt, F. M. & Kozuch, S. (2014). WIREs Comput. Mol. Sci. 4, 523–540. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Wonner, P., Dreger, A., Vogel, L., Engelage, E. & Huber, S. M. (2019a). Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 58, 16923–16927. Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Wonner, P., Steinke, T. & Huber, S. M. (2019b). Synlett, 30, 1673–1678. CAS Google Scholar
Wonner, P., Vogel, L., Kniep, F. & Huber, S. M. (2017). Chem. Eur. J. 23, 16972–16975. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Xiao, L. & Fu, H. (2019). Chem. Eur. J. 25, 714–723. CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Xu, R., Fellowes, T. & White, J. M. (2023). Acta Cryst. C79, 43–51. CSD CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Xu, Y., Szell, P. M. J., Kumar, V. & Bryce, D. L. (2020). Coord. Chem. Rev. 411, 213237. CrossRef Google Scholar
Yamada, S. & Konno, T. (2020). Curr. Org. Chem. 24, 2118–2152. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Yan, W., Zheng, M., Xu, C. & Chen, F. E. (2021). Green Synth. Catal. 2, 329–336. CrossRef Google Scholar
Yang, H. & Wong, M. W. (2020). Molecules, 25, 1–25. Google Scholar
Zhao, Y., Cotelle, Y., Sakai, N. & Matile, S. (2016). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 138, 4270–4277. CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Zheng, J., Suwardi, A., Wong, C. J. E., Loh, X. J. & Li, Z. (2021). Nanoscale Adv. 3, 6342–6357. CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Zierkiewicz, W., Michalczyk, M. & Scheiner, S. (2021). Molecules, 26, 1740. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.