research papers
Room-temperature crystal structures of [CH(NH2)2]3Sb2X9 (X = Br and I)
aDepartment of Chemistry, University College London, 20 Gordon St, London, WC1H 0AJ, United Kingdom, bIstituto Officina dei Materiali (IOM)–CNR, Area Science Park, S.S.14, Km 163.5, Trieste I-34149, Italy, cThe Electrochemical Innovation Lab, Department of Chemical Engineering, University College London, Torrington Place, London, WC1E 7JE, United Kingdom, and dDepartment of Chemistry, University of Oxford, Inorganic Chemistry Laboratory, South Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3QR, United Kingdom
*Correspondence e-mail: [email protected], [email protected]
Crystals of formamidinium antimony, halides, FA3Sb2X9 {FA = [CH(NH2)2]+; X = Br− and I−} {or triformamidinium nonahalidodiantimony, (CH5N2)3[Sb2X9]}, have been synthesized using a counter diffusion crystal growth (CDCG) method in silica gel and their structures determined from single-crystal X-ray diffraction data. FA3Sb2Br9 belongs to the trigonal P3m1, which is known as the Cs3Bi2Br9 structure type, and FA3Sb2I9 belongs to the hexagonal P63/mmc, called the Cs3Cr2Cl9 structure type. The change of the anion type from bromide to iodide results in the change of the structure type and the connectivity of the Sb—X octahedra. These structures are described and compared to the crystal types known for vacancy-ordered triple-perovskites.
1. Introduction
The A3B2X9 structure, where A is a monovalent cation, B is a trivalent cation and X is a halide, are commonly described as derivatives of the ABX3 perovskite structure type. In the ABX3 form, all [BX6]3− octahedra are corner-sharing and an A3B2X9 compound can be considered similarly, with removal of a third of the B-site cations (Hodgkins et al., 2019
; Chang et al., 2016
). As such, these structures are more commonly known as vacancy-ordered triple-perovskites. Typical A3B2X9 compounds are group 15 halides, mostly comprising of bismuth (Bi) and antimony (Sb) B-sites. The triple-perovskites are considered as perovskite derivatives that can similarly be applied in photovoltaic and radiation detection applications as lead-free alternatives (Eperon et al., 2014
; Hao et al., 2014
). Due to the optical and electronic properties possessed by these compounds for such applications, materials design approaches also include the formation of compounds with organic monovalent cations. Here, the crystal structure of two organic–inorganic triple-perovskites, namely, FA3Sb2X9 {FA = [CH(NH2)2]+; X = Br− and I−}, are reported.
2. Experimental methods
Single crystals were synthesized using a counter diffusion crystal growth (CDCG) method in silica gel. 27 mmol of Sb2O3 (Sigma–Aldrich, 99%) were reacted with excess HX, where X = Br (Sigma–Aldrich, 48 wt%) or I (Sigma–Aldrich, 57 wt%), to produce SbX3 in an acidic solution. In parallel, a 0.6 M aqueous solution of Na2SiO3 (Sigma–Aldrich) was prepared using distilled water. The Na2SiO3 solution was added dropwise in the presence of vigorous stirring to SbX3 in a 1:1 (v/v) ratio to form a SbX3-based silica gel. The solution was allowed to set in 50 ml tall-form beakers in a low-temperature oven at 29 °C over 24 h. Post gelation, solutions containing 41 mmol of FAX {FA = [CH(NH2)2]+}, made by dissolving formamidine acetate (Sigma–Aldrich, ≥ 98%) in HX, were added carefully atop the gel using pipettes to avoid disrupting the surface of the gel. The beaker was wrapped with parafilm and placed in an oven. Crystal growth occurred between 2–7 d. FA3Sb2Br9 was isolated in the form of pale-yellow plate-like crystals, while FA3Sb2I9 crystallized in the morphology of red–brown needle-like crystals (Fig. S1).
Powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD) was measured with a Stoe STADI-P X-ray diffractometer in thin foil transmission (Debye–Scherrer geometry) mode equipped with a germanium (111) monochromator and a Dectris Mythen 1K detector, with Cu Kα (λ = 1.5406 Å, using 40 kV and 30 mA) radiation at 298 K. Samples were loaded between two clear acetate sheets and sealed using silicon vacuum grease. Diffraction patterns were collected in a 2θ range from 2 to 70°, with a step size of 0.015° and a scan rate of 5 s per step. models (Rietveld, 1966
) on PXRD data were carried out within the TOPAS-Academic software suite (Version 7; Coelho, 2018
; Coelho, 2022
).
Single-crystal X-ray diffraction (SCXRD) was performed using an Agilent SuperNova diffractometer with an Atlas CCD detector. Full spheres of data were collected using 1° scan frames in ω with monochromated Cu or Mo Kα radiation at 295 K. A of the positions of the C, N and H atoms was not carried out because isotropic rotation of the FA cations takes place at room temperature like other organic monovalent cations (Liu et al., 2022
). The supporting information includes a discussion on the treatment of the FA cation in detail. The experimental details from SCXRD are summarized in Table 1
.
|
All other experimental techniques employed (Raman spectroscopy, and diffuse reflectance spectroscopy) are described in the supporting information.
3. Results and discussion
3.1. Description of structures
3.1.1. Formamidinium antimony bromide, FA3Sb2Br9
FA3Sb2Br9 was found to crystallize in the Cs3Bi2Br9 structure type. Compounds of this crystal type belong to the trigonal Pm1 (Lazarini, 1977
). The lattice parameters for FA3Sb2Br9 are a = 8.5161 (4), c = 10.0380 (4) Å and V = 630.46 (6) Å3. Similar to most organic–inorganic triple-perovskites, the FA cations possess rotational disorder at room temperature (Bhatt et al., 2025
), resulting in failed attempts to localize discrete C and N atoms. The solvent-masking routine in OLEX2 was employed (Dolomanov et al., 2009
) and a void volume of 244 Å3 per identified (38.7% of the total unit cell). The integrated electron count within this void was found to be 77 electrons. This is in excellent agreement with the 75 electrons expected theoretically for the three FA cations in the confirming the existence of FA cations in the compound. In this article, a single C atom was used as a placeholder in the to represent the FA cation, as discussed in the methods and supporting information.
Common bromide-based vacancy-ordered triple-perovskites that are also known to crystallize in this structure type include MA3Bi2Br9, MA3Sb2Br9 and FA3Bi2Br9 (MA = CH3NH3+) (Ishihara et al., 1992
; Tomaszewski, 1994
; Shen et al., 2020
). The isostructural Cs3Bi2Br9 was reported to have the Cs and Br atoms in a cubic close-packed arrangement, with the Bi atom occupying one-sixth of the octahedral holes in the The structure of FA3Sb2Br9 can also be considered a `2D form' of a vacancy-ordered triple-perovskite (Chen et al., 2024
). Here, the corner-sharing [SbBr6]3− octahedra possess a structural dimensionality such that the octahedra can be described as 2D layers, within which A-site cations are located. For FA3Sb2Br9 visualized in Fig. 1
(a), [SbBr6]3− octahedra (in light brown) generate these 2D layers by sharing three Br atoms with three different neighbouring octahedra.
| | Figure 1 Representation of FA3Sb2Br9 from this work shown (a) obliquely, (b) down the c axis and (c) down the b axis. Four unit cells are shown, with a black-bordered box around one Pink spheres represent Sb, brown spheres represent Br and the light-brown octahedra represent the [SbBr6]3− coordination environment. A-site atoms are bifurcated by their Wyckoff positions, i.e. green spheres represent C atoms on site 2d between [SbBr6]3− layers and red spheres reside on site 1a between rings of six [SbBr6]3− octahedra. C atoms are used in place of the FA ion, as explained in the text. The blue layer in (c) represents the common plane of bromide ions, as explained in the text. The figure was prepared using the VESTA software suite (Version 3; Momma & Izumi, 2011 |
Within the layer, the corner-sharing octahedra result in the formation of six-connected octahedra `rings' [Fig. 1
(b)] where the FA ions reside (red atoms). This is similar to the ABX3 perovskite structure with the exception of six surrounding B-site octahedra rather than eight (Xia et al., 2020
). In addition, the FA ions fill spaces between these corner-sharing octahedra 2D layers (green), observed as [SbBr6]3−–FA+–[SbBr6]3− layers along the c axis. The A- and B-site coordination numbers are 12 and 6, respectively, and agree with other compounds that crystallize in this structure type.
This structure has also been described previously as isolated layers formed by [SbBr6]3− octahedra pointing alternatively up or down with respect to a plane of common halide atoms (Tomaszewski, 1994
). Fig. 1
(c) shows the orientation of the octahedra alternating in orientation with respect to the layer of bromide ions (displayed with a blue line).
Refined atomic position parameters, selected interatomic distances and bond angles for FA3Sb2Br9 are listed in Table 2
. Each [SbBr6]3− octahedron has three equivalent Sb—Br1 and Sb—Br2 distances of 3.0598 (7) and 2.612 (2) Å, respectively. These are comparable to the distances reported in MA3Sb2Br9, where Sb—Br1 = 3.000 Å and Sb—Br2 = 2.627 Å (Ishihara et al., 1992
). Both FA3Sb2Br9 and MA3Sb2Br9 have similar bond angles of Br1—Sb—Br2 (≈177°) and Brx—Sb—Brx (in the range 88–92°), where x is the same number. This difference in the Sb—Br bond lengths and angles within a single octahedron arises from the distortions from the vertex-sharing Br1 halide ions.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
When compared to the bismuth compound MA3Bi2Br9, the Sb—Br1 distance of FA3Sb2Br9 is similar to Bi—Br1 (3.054 Å), while Sb—Br2 of FA3Sb2Br9 is smaller than Bi—Br2 (2.772 Å) in MA3Bi2Br9. The six-coordinate ionic radius of Sb3+ (0.76 Å) in FA3Sb2Br9 is smaller compared to that of Bi3+ (1.03 Å) in MA3Bi2Br9 (Ahrens, 1952
; Shannon, 1976
). Antimony compounds are therefore expected to have smaller unit cells and shorter bond lengths compared to bromobismuthates. Smaller B-site ions also mean the [SbBr6]3− octahedra are expected to have lower angular distortions than [BiBr6]3−. Considering bond angles, there is a stronger distortion of the Br—Bi—Br angles, with Br1—Bi—Br2 being ≈169.3° and Brx—Bi—Brx in the range 84–88°. The angles in the Bi compound are smaller than equivalent octahedral bond angles in FA3Sb2Br9, where Br atoms are arranged around a larger cation (Lazarini, 1977
).
The plotted Rietveld refinement of PXRD data (Fig. 2
) shows excellent agreement between the Yobs and Ycalc plots. The commensurate position of the Bragg reflections from SCXRD resolution and the peak positions from PXRD data indicate that the structural resolution is accurate for both single crystals and polycrystalline powders. A goodness-of-fit (GOF) of 1.14 and Rw = 10.319% were achieved.
| | Figure 2 Rietveld refinement on the PXRD pattern of FA3Sb2Br9 single crystals made by CDCG. Input unit-cell information was taken from the structure resolved from SCXRD data. Yobs (red) is the collected diffraction pattern, Ycalc (blue) is the calculated pattern from TOPAS-Academic and Yobs − Ycalc (yellow) is the residual plot. Reflections that are ≥5% of the highest intensity reflection are indexed. |
3.1.2. Formamidinium antimony iodide, FA3Sb2I9
FA3Sb2I9 belongs to the hexagonal P63/mmc at room temperature. This is known as the Cs3Cr2Cl9 structural type wherein FA3Bi2I9, MA3Sb2I9 (MA = CH3NH3), Cs3Sb2I9 and Cs3Bi2I9 are known structures of group 15 triple-perovskites (Szklarz et al., 2019
; Ju et al., 2018
; Yamada et al., 1997
; Arakcheeva et al., 1999
). FA3Sb2I9 has been reported previously at 195 K, also exhibiting the P63/mmc (Szklarz et al., 2020
). One way to describe this structure considers the FA cation and I atoms forming close-packed FAI3 layers, with Sb atoms occupying one-sixth of the total octahedral holes (Arakcheeva et al., 1999
). The close packing of the AX layers is hexagonal and the layered structure is comprised of isolated [Sb2I9]3− bioctahedra or `dimers' which share a triangular face and three iodide ions. These are illustrated in Fig. 3
as purple polyhedra. As such, this variant of the triple-perovskite is also regarded as a 0D isolated dimer structure. The Sb—Sb axis within each bioctahedron is parallel to the c axis.
| Figure 3 Unit-cell representation of FA3Sb2I9 from this work shown obliquely. Green spheres represent Sb, grey spheres represent I and purple bioctahedra represent the [Sb2I9]3− coordination environment. C atoms are bifurcated by their Wyckoff positions, i.e. pink spheres represent C atoms on site 4f and brown spheres reside on site 2b. C atoms are used in place of the FA ion, as explained in the text. The figure was prepared using the VESTA software suite (Version 3; Momma & Izumi, 2011 |
As in the bromide structure, the FA cations were found to be highly disordered. A total void volume of 541 Å3 (37.3% of the total unit cell) was identified, containing 105 electrons per which corresponds to the region occupied by the disordered cations. While this is lower than the ideal count for six FA cations (150 electrons), it is consistent with the presence of rotationally disordered organic species that cannot be resolved into discrete atomic positions. When a single C atom in the void replaces one FA cation, a similar R factor is achieved. Thus, the FA cations in the are represented by C atoms.
The C1 position of the cation (pink) at 4f is in the same plane of each dimer and its coordination can be described as identical layered stacking of the iodide ions with a hexagonal coordination (six) on either side of the FA cation (Stranger et al., 1978
). Additionally, C2, in brown, appears displaced from the plane of the terminal iodide ions of the bioctahedra, also resulting in a cuboctahedral coordinated FAI12 environment.
The atomic positions, bioctahedral bond lengths and angles of FA3Sb2I9 are summarized in Table 3
. For FA3Sb2I9, the Sb—I1 bond length is 3.2323 (12) Å, while Sb—I2 is 2.8758 (13) Å. These align well with the Sb—I bond lengths of the structure that Szklarz et al., (2020
) collected on FA3Sb2I9 at 195 K, i.e. 3.213 and 2.881 Å. These values are also similar to those in the bioctahedra of A3Sb2I9 (A = Cs or MA), with bond lengths of 3.198 and 2.870 Å for A = Cs, and 3.213 and 2.887 Å for A = MA (Chabot & Parthé, 1978
; Ju et al., 2018
). These confirm crystallization of A3Sb2I9 in a Cs3Cr2Cl9-type crystal structure at room temperature. Bond angles in the range 83–94° for terminal I—Sb—I, and around 172.9° for bridging I—Sb—I are similarly comparable to literature values. For MA3Sb2I9, the bond angles are in the range 84–91° for terminal I—Sb—I, and around 173.8° for bridging I—Sb—I. These angles diverge from 90 and 180°, respectively, indicating the distortion of the bioctahedral units as a result of face-sharing in the ab plane.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The of PXRD data in Fig. 4
is based on the SCXRD structure and shows good agreement with the PXRD data collected, fortifying the triple-perovskite structure at room temperature. A goodness-of-fit (GOF) of 1.11 and Rw = 9.217% were achieved.
| | Figure 4 Rietveld refinement on the PXRD pattern of FA3Sb2I9 single crystals made by CDCG. Input unit-cell information was taken from the structure resolved from SCXRD data. Yobs (red) is the collected diffraction pattern, Ycalc (blue) is the calculated pattern from TOPAS-Academic and Yobs − Ycalc (yellow) is the residual plot. Reflections that are ≥5% of the highest intensity reflection are indexed. |
(XPS) was employed for the identification of chemical environments and elemental quantification to verify the formation of A3B2X9 compounds; see Fig. S2 and Tables S1 and S2 in the supporting information. The elemental quantification in Table S2 matches closely the expected A3B2X9 composition. From the survey spectra [Fig. S2(a)], core lines from the expected elements for FA3Sb2X9 are observed, in addition to Si from contamination during sample plating. The supporting information also reports the absolute binding energy (BE) values of the core levels in Table S1, due to issues noted for the application of charge compensation (such as C 1s) for organic–inorganic compounds (Jia et al., 2023
). From the XPS spectra, the relative BE (ΔBE) between the N1s core line (from the FA cation, appearing around 400 eV) and the Sb 3d5/2 core line (appearing around 530 eV) is 130.2 eV for FA3Sb2Br9 and 129.6 eV for FA3Sb2I9. The values are within 1 eV of each other, indicating the presence of similar A- and B-site chemical environments, regardless of the halide. The reduction in the ΔBE(Sb 3d5/2—N1s) values from FA3Sb2Br9 to FA3Sb2I9 may be due to a shift of Sb3 d5/2 to lower BE and/or a shift of N 1s to higher BE. A shift of a core level to lower (higher) BEs is indicative of higher (lower) charge densities around the atom (Greczynski & Hultman, 2022
). Given the lower electronegativity of iodine, it is reasonable to assume that the Sb in FA3Sb2I9 has greater charge density than Sb in FA3Sb2Br9, which then explains the change in ΔBE(Sb 3d5/2—N 1s).
4. Conclusions and future perspectives
Single crystals of FA3Sb2X9 (X = Br− and I−) were grown successfully by counter diffusion crystal growth in silica gel, and their room-temperature structures identified. FA3Sb2Br9 crystallizes in the Cs3Bi2Br9 structure type, while FA3Sb2I9 belongs to the Cs3Cr2Cl9 structure type. Both structures were compared to known compounds of group 15 triple-perovskites. Further work to understand these crystal structures may include the study of temperature-dependent phase transitions, in particular to resolve the organic A-site positions and to gain further insights on the stability of these compounds.
5. Related literature
The following references are cited in the supporting information for this article: Kalha et al. (2020
); McCall et al. (2017
); Scofield (1973
); Scholz et al. (2018
); Teterin et al. (2008
); Wolstenholme (2008
).
Supporting information
Link https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17578603
Data for this article, including all processed data of the figures, are available at Zenodo in Origin format
contains datablocks I, II, global. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1107/S2053229626000811/yd3067sup1.cif
Structure factors: contains datablock I. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1107/S2053229626000811/yd3067Isup2.hkl
Structure factors: contains datablock II. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1107/S2053229626000811/yd3067IIsup3.hkl
Treatment of the disordered formamidinium cation in single crystal and additional experimental methods. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1107/S2053229626000811/yd3067sup4.pdf
| (CH5N2)3[Sb2Br9] | Dx = 2.630 Mg m−3 |
| Mr = 998.72 | Cu Kα radiation, λ = 1.54184 Å |
| Trigonal, P3m1 | Cell parameters from 2382 reflections |
| a = 8.5161 (4) Å | θ = 4.4–52.7° |
| c = 10.0380 (4) Å | µ = 33.54 mm−1 |
| V = 630.46 (6) Å3 | T = 295 K |
| Z = 1 | Plate, clear yellowish yellow |
| F(000) = 435 | 0.19 × 0.15 × 0.04 mm |
| Agilent SuperNova Dual Source diffractometer with a HyPix-Arc 100 detector | 546 independent reflections |
| Radiation source: micro-focus sealed X-ray tube, SuperNova (Cu) X-ray Source | 391 reflections with I > 2σ(I) |
| Mirror monochromator | Rint = 0.089 |
| Detector resolution: 10.0000 pixels mm-1 | θmax = 76.8°, θmin = 4.4° |
| ω scans | h = −10→10 |
| Absorption correction: multi-scan (CrysAlis PRO; Rigaku OD, 2022) | k = −10→9 |
| Tmin = 0.061, Tmax = 1.000 | l = −12→12 |
| 13069 measured reflections |
| Refinement on F2 | 0 restraints |
| Least-squares matrix: full | Primary atom site location: dual |
| R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.067 | H-atom parameters not defined |
| wR(F2) = 0.241 | w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.1581P)2] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3 |
| S = 1.14 | (Δ/σ)max < 0.001 |
| 546 reflections | Δρmax = 1.11 e Å−3 |
| 19 parameters | Δρmin = −1.03 e Å−3 |
Geometry. All esds (except the esd in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell esds are taken into account individually in the estimation of esds in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between esds in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell esds is used for estimating esds involving l.s. planes. |
Refinement. Data was processed with the CrysAlis PRO software suite, and the structure was solved with SHELXT (Sheldrick, 2015a) and refined with SHELXL (Sheldrick, 2015b) within the OLEX2 software suite (Dolomanov et al., 2009). |
| x | y | z | Uiso*/Ueq | ||
| Sb1 | 0.3333 | 0.6667 | 0.31852 (12) | 0.1112 (8) | |
| Br1 | 0.5000 | 1.5000 | 0.5000 | 0.1457 (11) | |
| Br2 | 0.6278 (3) | 0.81392 (16) | 0.17401 (18) | 0.1710 (12) | |
| C1 | 0.6667 | 1.3333 | 0.191 (4) | 0.21 (3) | |
| C2 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.5000 | 0.22 (3) |
| U11 | U22 | U33 | U12 | U13 | U23 | |
| Sb1 | 0.1230 (10) | 0.1230 (10) | 0.0876 (9) | 0.0615 (5) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Br1 | 0.1652 (19) | 0.1652 (19) | 0.1377 (19) | 0.1057 (19) | −0.0055 (6) | 0.0055 (6) |
| Br2 | 0.1663 (18) | 0.205 (2) | 0.1289 (15) | 0.0832 (9) | 0.0485 (12) | 0.0242 (6) |
| C1 | 0.20 (3) | 0.20 (3) | 0.24 (7) | 0.101 (17) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| C2 | 0.24 (5) | 0.24 (5) | 0.18 (6) | 0.12 (2) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Sb1—Sb1i | 6.1195 (14) | Sb1—Br2viii | 2.6119 (19) |
| Sb1—Sb1ii | 6.1195 (14) | Sb1—Br2ix | 2.6119 (19) |
| Sb1—Sb1iii | 6.1195 (14) | Sb1—Br2 | 2.612 (2) |
| Sb1—Br1iv | 3.0598 (7) | Br1—Sb1x | 3.0597 (7) |
| Sb1—Br1v | 10.8696 (5) | Br1—Sb1ii | 10.8696 (5) |
| Sb1—Br1vi | 3.0598 (7) | Br1—Sb1i | 3.0598 (7) |
| Sb1—Br1vii | 3.0598 (7) | ||
| Sb1iii—Sb1—Sb1ii | 88.19 (3) | Br2—Sb1—Sb1i | 89.80 (4) |
| Sb1i—Sb1—Sb1ii | 88.18 (3) | Br2—Sb1—Sb1iii | 177.20 (6) |
| Sb1iii—Sb1—Sb1i | 88.18 (3) | Br2—Sb1—Sb1ii | 89.80 (4) |
| Sb1ii—Sb1—Br1v | 89.489 (7) | Br2ix—Sb1—Sb1ii | 89.80 (4) |
| Sb1iii—Sb1—Br1v | 122.428 (18) | Br2viii—Sb1—Sb1ii | 177.20 (6) |
| Sb1i—Sb1—Br1v | 34.243 (8) | Br2ix—Sb1—Sb1i | 177.20 (6) |
| Br1vii—Sb1—Sb1iii | 88.18 (3) | Br2ix—Sb1—Br1vii | 177.20 (6) |
| Br1vi—Sb1—Sb1ii | 0.0 | Br2—Sb1—Br1vi | 89.80 (4) |
| Br1vi—Sb1—Sb1iii | 88.19 (3) | Br2—Sb1—Br1v | 55.58 (4) |
| Br1iv—Sb1—Sb1iii | 0.0 | Br2viii—Sb1—Br1iv | 89.80 (4) |
| Br1vii—Sb1—Sb1i | 0.0 | Br2viii—Sb1—Br1vii | 89.80 (4) |
| Br1iv—Sb1—Sb1ii | 88.18 (3) | Br2—Sb1—Br1iv | 177.20 (6) |
| Br1iv—Sb1—Sb1i | 88.18 (3) | Br2—Sb1—Br1vii | 89.80 (4) |
| Br1vi—Sb1—Sb1i | 88.18 (3) | Br2ix—Sb1—Br1iv | 89.80 (4) |
| Br1vii—Sb1—Sb1ii | 88.18 (3) | Br2ix—Sb1—Br1vi | 89.80 (4) |
| Br1vii—Sb1—Br1vi | 88.18 (3) | Br2viii—Sb1—Br1vi | 177.20 (6) |
| Br1vii—Sb1—Br1iv | 88.18 (3) | Br2viii—Sb1—Br1v | 89.945 (11) |
| Br1vi—Sb1—Br1v | 89.489 (7) | Br2ix—Sb1—Br1v | 147.72 (4) |
| Br1vii—Sb1—Br1v | 34.243 (8) | Br2viii—Sb1—Br2ix | 92.14 (8) |
| Br1iv—Sb1—Br1v | 122.428 (18) | Br2—Sb1—Br2ix | 92.14 (8) |
| Br1iv—Sb1—Br1vi | 88.18 (3) | Br2viii—Sb1—Br2 | 92.14 (8) |
| Br2viii—Sb1—Sb1i | 89.80 (4) | Sb1x—Br1—Sb1i | 180.00 (4) |
| Br2viii—Sb1—Sb1iii | 89.80 (4) | Sb1i—Br1—Sb1ii | 34.243 (8) |
| Br2ix—Sb1—Sb1iii | 89.80 (4) | Sb1x—Br1—Sb1ii | 145.757 (8) |
| Symmetry codes: (i) −x+1, −x+y+1, −z+1; (ii) x−y+1, −y+1, −z+1; (iii) −x, −y+1, −z+1; (iv) −x+y−1, y−1, z; (v) y, −x+y+1, −z+1; (vi) x, y−1, z; (vii) −y+2, x−y+2, z; (viii) −y+1, x−y+1, z; (ix) −x+y, −x+1, z; (x) x, y+1, z. |
| (CH6N2)3[Sb2I9] | Dx = 3.255 Mg m−3 |
| Mr = 1421.63 | Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å |
| Hexagonal, P63/mmc | Cell parameters from 5687 reflections |
| a = 8.7552 (4) Å | θ = 3.3–23.1° |
| c = 21.8474 (12) Å | µ = 11.42 mm−1 |
| V = 1450.32 (15) Å3 | T = 295 K |
| Z = 2 | Prism, clear reddish red |
| F(000) = 1194 | 0.13 × 0.13 × 0.09 mm |
| Agilent SuperNova Dual Source diffractometer with a HyPix-Arc 100 detector | 896 independent reflections |
| Radiation source: micro-focus sealed X-ray tube, SuperNova (Mo) X-ray Source | 456 reflections with I > 2σ(I) |
| Mirror monochromator | Rint = 0.104 |
| Detector resolution: 10.0000 pixels mm-1 | θmax = 31.2°, θmin = 3.3° |
| ω scans | h = −12→12 |
| Absorption correction: multi-scan (CrysAlis PRO; Rigaku OD, 2022) | k = −12→12 |
| Tmin = 0.263, Tmax = 1.000 | l = −30→31 |
| 36967 measured reflections |
| Refinement on F2 | 1 restraint |
| Least-squares matrix: full | Primary atom site location: dual |
| R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.056 | H-atom parameters not defined |
| wR(F2) = 0.242 | w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.1393P)2] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3 |
| S = 1.05 | (Δ/σ)max = 0.001 |
| 896 reflections | Δρmax = 1.24 e Å−3 |
| 19 parameters | Δρmin = −0.44 e Å−3 |
Geometry. All esds (except the esd in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell esds are taken into account individually in the estimation of esds in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between esds in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell esds is used for estimating esds involving l.s. planes. |
Refinement. Data was processed with the CrysAlis PRO software suite, and the structure was solved with SHELXT (Sheldrick, 2015a) and refined with SHELXL (Sheldrick, 2015b) within the OLEX2 software suite (Dolomanov et al., 2009). |
| x | y | z | Uiso*/Ueq | ||
| Sb1 | 0.666667 | 0.333333 | 0.34472 (6) | 0.0811 (7) | |
| I1 | 0.50293 (8) | 0.49707 (8) | 0.250000 | 0.1046 (7) | |
| I2 | 0.82616 (9) | 0.65233 (18) | 0.41593 (6) | 0.1311 (7) | |
| C1 | 0.333333 | 0.666667 | 0.407 (3) | 0.20 (3) | |
| C2 | 1.000000 | 1.000000 | 0.250000 | 0.20 (3) |
| U11 | U22 | U33 | U12 | U13 | U23 | |
| Sb1 | 0.0797 (8) | 0.0797 (8) | 0.0837 (10) | 0.0399 (4) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| I1 | 0.1107 (11) | 0.1107 (11) | 0.1240 (12) | 0.0792 (10) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| I2 | 0.1462 (11) | 0.1093 (10) | 0.1256 (11) | 0.0547 (5) | −0.0190 (3) | −0.0380 (6) |
| C1 | 0.116 (18) | 0.116 (18) | 0.38 (7) | 0.058 (9) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| C2 | 0.20 (5) | 0.20 (5) | 0.19 (7) | 0.10 (2) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Sb1—I1i | 3.2323 (12) | Sb1—I2iii | 2.8758 (13) |
| Sb1—I1ii | 3.2323 (12) | Sb1—I2 | 2.8759 (13) |
| Sb1—I1 | 3.2323 (12) | Sb1—I2iv | 2.8758 (13) |
| Sb1—I1iii | 3.2323 (12) | I1—I1ii | 0.0000 (13) |
| I1iii—Sb1—I1i | 83.41 (3) | I2—Sb1—I1ii | 91.34 (3) |
| I1i—Sb1—I1 | 83.41 (3) | I2iii—Sb1—I1i | 91.34 (3) |
| I1iii—Sb1—I1 | 83.41 (3) | I2iv—Sb1—I1i | 91.34 (3) |
| I1iii—Sb1—I1ii | 83.41 (3) | I2iii—Sb1—I1 | 172.94 (5) |
| I1—Sb1—I1ii | 0.000 (18) | I2—Sb1—I1 | 91.34 (3) |
| I1i—Sb1—I1ii | 83.41 (3) | I2iv—Sb1—I1 | 91.34 (3) |
| I2iii—Sb1—I1iii | 91.34 (3) | I2iii—Sb1—I2 | 93.50 (5) |
| I2—Sb1—I1i | 172.94 (5) | I2iii—Sb1—I2iv | 93.50 (5) |
| I2iv—Sb1—I1ii | 91.34 (3) | I2iv—Sb1—I2 | 93.50 (5) |
| I2iv—Sb1—I1iii | 172.94 (5) | Sb1v—I1—Sb1 | 79.62 (5) |
| I2iii—Sb1—I1ii | 172.94 (5) | I1ii—I1—Sb1v | 0 (10) |
| I2—Sb1—I1iii | 91.34 (3) | I1ii—I1—Sb1 | 0 (10) |
| Symmetry codes: (i) x, x−y, z; (ii) −y+1, −x+1, −z+1/2; (iii) −x+y+1, −x+1, z; (iv) −y+1, x−y, z; (v) −x+y+1, y, −z+1/2. |
| See Table 2 for definitions. |
| Atom | x | y | z | Occ | W | U |
| Sb | 1/3 | 2/3 | 0.31852 (12) | 1 | 2d | 0.1112 (8) |
| Br1 | 1/2 | 3/2 | 1/2 | 1 | 3f | 0.1457 (11) |
| Br2 | 0.6278 (3) | 0.81392 (16) | 0.17401 (18) | 1 | 6i | 0.1709 (12) |
| C1 | 2/3 | 4/3 | 0.191 (4) | 1 | 2d | 0.21 (3) |
| C2 | -3.00000 | -1.00000 | 1/2 | 1 | 1b | 0.22 (3) |
| Atoms | Interatomic distance | Atoms | Bond angle | |||
| Sb—Br1 | 3.0598 (7) | Br1—Sb—Br2 | 177.20 (6) | |||
| Sb—Br2 | 2.612 (2) | Br1—Sb—Br1 | 88.18 (3) | |||
| Br1—Br2 | 4.016 (3) | Br2—Sb—Br2 | 92.14 (8) |
| x, y and z are the position parameters of different atoms, and `Occ' is the occupancy of the atom at the determined position. W is the notation and U is the anisotropic displacement parameter. C atoms are in place of the FA ion as explained in the text. Bond distances and angles were determined using the VESTA software suite (Version 3; Momma & Izumi, 2011). ["Br1—Sb1—Br1 88.18 (3)" 122.428 (18) in CIF] |
| Atom | x | y | z | Occ | W | U |
| Sb | 2/3 | 1/3 | 0.34482 (6) | 1 | 4f | 0.0810 (6) |
| I1 | 0.50288 (8) | 0.49712 (8) | 1/2 | 1 | 6h | 0.1312 (7) |
| I2 | 0.82610 (9) | 0.65220 (18) | 0.41593 (6) | 1 | 12k | 0.1312 (7) |
| C1 | 1/3 | 2/3 | 0.405 (4) | 1 | 4f | 0.21 (2) |
| C2 | 1.00000 | 1.00000 | 1/4 | 1 | 2b | 0.20 (3) |
| Atoms | Interatomic distance | Atoms | Bond angle | |||
| Sb—I1 | 3.2323 (12) | I1—Sb—I2 | 172.94 (5) | |||
| Sb—I2 | 2.8758 (13) | I1—Sb—I1 | 83.41 (3) | |||
| I1—I2 | 4.3762 (15) | I2—Sb—I2 | 93.50 (5) |
Acknowledgements
XPS was carried out at Harwell XPS, the National XPS Facility (EP/Y023587/1).
Data availability
Data for this article, including all processed data of the figures, are available at Zenodo in Origin format at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17578603.
References
Ahrens, L. H. (1952). Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 2, 155–169. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Arakcheeva, A., Bonin, M., Chapuis, G. & Zaitsev, A. (1999). Z. Kristallogr. Cryst. Mater. 214, 279–283. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Bhatt, P., Stucky de Quay, T., Liu, Y., Evans, T., McCullough, O., Fernando, N. K., Kalha, C., Palgrave, R. G. & Regoutz, A. (2025). ChemPhysChem 26, e202500370. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Chabot, B. & Parthé, E. (1978). Acta Cryst. B34, 645–648. CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Web of Science Google Scholar
Chang, J.-H., Doert, T. & Ruck, M. (2016). Z. Anorg. Allge Chem. 642, 736–748. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Chen, C., Xu, J., Wang, X. & Palgrave, R. G. (2024). J. Mater. Chem. A 12, 5055–5079. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Coelho, A. A. (2018). J. Appl. Cryst. 51, 210–218. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Coelho, A. A. (2022). TOPAS-Academic. Version 7.1. https://topas-academic.com/. Google Scholar
Dolomanov, O. V., Bourhis, L. J., Gildea, R. J., Howard, J. A. K. & Puschmann, H. (2009). J. Appl. Cryst. 42, 339–341. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Eperon, G. E., Burlakov, V. M., Docampo, P., Goriely, A. & Snaith, H. J. (2014). Adv. Funct. Mater. 24, 151–157. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Greczynski, G. & Hultman, L. (2022). Vacuum 205, 111463. CrossRef Google Scholar
Hao, F., Stoumpos, C. C., Cao, D. H., Chang, R. P. H. & Kanatzidis, M. G. (2014). Nat. Photonics 8, 489–494. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Hodgkins, T. L., Savory, C. N., Bass, K. K., Seckman, B. L., Scanlon, D. O., Djurovich, P. I., Thompson, M. E. & Melot, B. C. (2019). Chem. Commun. 55, 3164–3167. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Ishihara, H., Watanabe, K., Iwata, A., Yamada, K., Kinoshita, Y., Okuda, T., Krishnan, V., Dou, S.-Q. & Weiss, A. (1992). Z. Naturforsch. A 47, 65–74. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Jia, X., Liu, Y., Bhatt, P., Perry, R. S., Parkin, I. P. & Palgrave, R. G. (2023). Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 25, 4563–4569. CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Ju, D., Jiang, X., Xiao, H., Chen, X., Hu, X. & Tao, X. (2018). J. Mater. Chem. A 6, 20753–20759. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Kalha, C., Fernando, N. K. & Regoutz, A. (2020). Digitisation of Scofield Photoionisation Cross Section Tabulated Data, figshare. Dataset. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.12967079.v1. Google Scholar
Lazarini, F. (1977). Acta Cryst. B33, 2961–2964. CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Liu, Y., Cockcroft, J. K., Chen, Z., Hayward, M. A., Henry, P. F., Perry, R. S. & Palgrave, R. G. (2022). J. Mater. Chem. C 10, 11938–11945. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
McCall, K. M., Stoumpos, C. C., Kostina, S. S., Kanatzidis, M. G. & Wessels, B. W. (2017). Chem. Mater. 29, 4129–4145. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Momma, K. & Izumi, F. (2011). J. Appl. Cryst. 44, 1272–1276. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Rietveld, H. M. (1966). Acta Cryst. 20, 508–513. CrossRef ICSD CAS IUCr Journals Web of Science Google Scholar
Rigaku OD (2022). CrysAlis PRO. Rigaku Oxford Diffraction Ltd, Yarnton, Oxfordshire, England. Google Scholar
Scholz, M., Morgenroth, M., Oum, K. & Lenzer, T. (2018). J. Phys. Chem. C 122, 5854–5863. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Scofield, J. H. (1973). Technical Report UCRL-51326. Lawrence Livermore Laboratory, California, USA. Google Scholar
Shannon, R. D. (1976). Acta Cryst. A32, 751–767. CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Web of Science Google Scholar
Sheldrick, G. M. (2015a). Acta Cryst. A71, 3–8. Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Sheldrick, G. M. (2015b). Acta Cryst. C71, 3–8. Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Shen, Y., Yin, J., Cai, B., Wang, Z., Dong, Y., Xu, X. & Zheng, H. (2020). Nanoscale Horiz. 5, 580–585. CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Stranger, R., Grey, I. E., Madsen, I. C. & Smith, P. W. (1978). J. Solid State Chem. 69, 162–170. CrossRef Google Scholar
Szklarz, P., Gągor, A., Jakubas, R., Zieliński, P., Piecha-Bisiorek, A., Cichos, J., Karbowiak, M., Bator, G. & Ciżman, A. (2019). J. Mater. Chem. C 7, 3003–3014. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Szklarz, P., Jakubas, R., Gągor, A., Bator, G., Cichos, J. & Karbowiak, M. (2020). Inorg. Chem. Front. 7, 1780–1789. Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Teterin, A. Y., Teterin, Y. A., Maslakov, K., Yarzhemskii, V., Sverchkov, S., Denker, B., Galagan, B., Iskhakova, L., Bulatov, L., Dvoirin, V., Mashinskii, V. M., Umnikove, A. A., Gur'yanove, A. N., Nefedovb, V. I. & Dianov, E. M. (2008). Dokl. Phys. 53, 566–570. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Tomaszewski, P. (1994). Phys. Status Solidi B 181, 15–21. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Wolstenholme, J. (2008). Surf. Interface Anal. 40. 966–968. Google Scholar
Xia, M., Yuan, J.-H., Niu, G., Du, X., Yin, L., Pan, W., Luo, J., Li, Z., Zhao, H. K.-H., Xue, X., Miao, X. & Tang, J. (2020). Adv. Funct. Mater. 30, 1910648. CrossRef Google Scholar
Yamada, K., Sera, H., Sawada, S., Tada, H., Okuda, T. & Tanaka, H. (1997). J. Solid State Chem. 134, 319–325. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.

journal menu
access



