research papers
Structural determination and modeling of ciliary microtubules
aDepartment of Biological Chemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, Blavatnik Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
*Correspondence e-mail: alan_brown@hms.harvard.edu
The axoneme, a microtubule-based array at the center of every cilium, has been the subject of structural investigations for decades, but only recent advances in cryo-EM and cryo-ET have allowed a molecular-level interpretation of the entire complex to be achieved. The unique properties of the nine doublet microtubules and central pair of singlet microtubules that form the axoneme, including the highly decorated tubulin lattice and the docking of massive axonemal complexes, provide opportunities and challenges for sample preparation, 3D reconstruction and atomic modeling. Here, the approaches used for cryo-EM and cryo-ET of axonemes are reviewed, while highlighting the unique opportunities provided by the latest generation of AI-guided tools that are transforming structural biology.
Keywords: cryo-EM; cryo-ET; cilia; axonemes; microtubules.
1. Introduction
1.1. The structure of the axoneme comes into view
Our understanding of axonemal structure is intertwined with developments in ; Afzelius, 1955; Fawcett & Porter, 1954; Fig. 1a). Similar experiments on nonmotile (primary) cilia revealed a 9 + 0 architecture comprising DMTs without the CA (Barnes, 1961). These and further studies provided the first views of the DMT, revealing an A tubule with 13 protofilaments connected to a B tubule with ten protofilaments. For motile cilia, they also revealed periodic complexes projecting from the microtubule surfaces (Fig. 1b). Each axonemal DMT was shown to be composed of 96 nm repeating units that feature two rows of dynein motors – outer and inner dynein arms – that power the ciliary beat. Additional regulatory complexes such as radial spokes (RSs) and the nexin–dynein regulatory complex (N-DRC) form connections with adjacent dyneins to adjust the waveform dynamics in response to mechanical cues (Witman et al., 1978; Bozkurt & Woolley, 1993).
Early transmission electron-microscopy (TEM) studies, using thin-sectioned, resin-embedded samples, described the canonical 9 + 2 microtubule architecture of the axoneme of motile cilia, with nine doublet microtubules (DMTs) encircling a central apparatus (CA) of two singlet microtubules (Taira & Shibasaki, 1978Later work eliminated the need for chemical fixation by imaging cryopreserved cilia and ciliated cells (Nicastro et al., 2005, 2006; Sui & Downing, 2006). Because of the size and the intricate architecture of the axoneme, the first cryoelectron microscopy (cryo-EM) studies of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii and sea urchin sperm axonemes were studied by tomography (cryo-ET), in which the samples were imaged from multiple angles to create a tilt series that could be aligned and interpolated to create a three-dimensional tomogram. Subtomogram averaging (STA) exploited the periodicity of the DMT to enhance the resolution, improve signal-to-noise ratios and mitigate anisotropy. These refined averages were the first to distinguish the orientation of the dyneins and their connections to other axonemal complexes (Nicastro et al., 2005, 2006; Bui et al., 2012; Fig. 1c), providing valuable information about the regulatory mechanisms that coordinate dynein activity. In addition to these large features, tomographic reconstructions also identified densities periodically associated with the inside walls of the DMT now known as `microtubule inner proteins' or `MIPs' that repeat with a periodicity of up to 48 nm (Sui & Downing, 2006; Nicastro et al., 2006). These were initially speculated to reinforce the protofilament network and dock axonemal complexes, a prescient suggestion that was later substantiated by functional and structural studies (Nicastro et al., 2006; Owa et al., 2019; Ichikawa et al., 2017, 2019).
These pioneering cryo-ET studies significantly improved our understanding of axonemal ultrastructure. However, it was only upon the introduction of cryo-EM with single-particle analysis (SPA) that subnanometre reconstructions became possible. SPA removed the need to tilt the sample during data acquisition, which led to higher throughput, less electron damage, improved signal-to-noise ratios and, ultimately, higher resolution. Applied to the DMT, advances in high-resolution imaging, sample preparation and particle-alignment workflows culminated in the reconstruction of the 48 nm repeat of the C. reinhardtii DMT at ∼3.5 Å resolution (Ma et al., 2019) and the generation of an atomic model (Fig. 1d). Once this was achieved, the application of SPA cryo-EM to DMT complexes from various species and cell types resulted in a boon of reconstructions that have proven to be key in establishing the identities, positions, repeat lengths, structures and interactions of DMT-associated proteins (Gui, Farley et al., 2021; Walton et al., 2023; Kubo et al., 2023; Leung et al., 2023; Zhou et al., 2023; Gui, Croft et al., 2022). Information from these structures has provided invaluable insights into the function of axonemal proteins, the evolution of the axoneme and the molecular underpinnings of ciliopathies.
1.2. Reconstruction of axonemal microtubules
There are several hurdles that make determination of the structure of axonemal microtubules by SPA cryo-EM difficult. Imaging the axoneme directly produces projection images with overlapping DMT and CA microtubules, complicating particle picking and alignment (Cheng et al., 2015). Methods for deconstructing the axoneme into its constitutive filaments have proven to be successful in separating axonemal microtubules, but typically result in the degradation or loss of native interactions. To overcome the challenge of sample preservation, axonemes can be gently splayed into constitutive filaments suitable for cryo-EM imaging while retaining the majority of axonemal proteins (Walton et al., 2021, 2023).
In addition to the difficulties introduced by sample preparation for cryo-EM imaging, particle alignment of DMTs is not straightforward, mainly due to their 96 nm repeat units. During particle picking, the register of these units along the microtubule filament is unclear, so any given point along a DMT filament will be at an indeterminate position within the 96 nm repeat. Therefore, to accurately align particles with the correct periodicity, the local register of the particles must be identified through a series of 3D classifications starting from 8 nm picked particles. As a result, particles can be aligned with periodicities of 24, 48 or 96 nm, which are sufficient to resolve the majority of DMT-associated proteins.
The last challenge in determining the structure of DMTs is the construction of atomic models. This process involves identifying axonemal proteins, generating initial models, integrating them within the larger complex and refining them against the cryo-EM density. Because the axoneme is a complex comprising several hundred different proteins, many of whose structures have not been determined, each step in this process is demanding. However, the challenge of model building has waned with improvements in automated, AI-driven model-building methods.
This review will summarize the advances that made atomic models of axonemal microtubules possible. We will describe sample preparation for SPA imaging, review the image-processing procedure and discuss methods for protein identification and model building for cryo-EM density. Finally, we will evaluate the exciting new developments that make cryo-ET poised to re-emerge as the premier method for axonemal structure determination.
2. Cryo-EM single-particle analysis of cilia components
Drawing upon decades of genetic, biochemical and structural studies, SPA cryo-EM of the axoneme has recently achieved a significant milestone: a near-complete atomic model of the axoneme for the model organism C. reinhardtii (Walton et al., 2023; Fig. 1d). This journey began with cryo-EM studies characterizing the α- and β-tubulin lattice of the DMT (Ichikawa et al., 2017; Maheshwari et al., 2015), and soon thereafter reached resolutions enabling the identification of MIPs in DMTs from both C. reinhardtii and Tetrahymena thermophila (Ma et al., 2019; Khalifa et al., 2020). The determination of the 48 nm DMT repeat structure in C. reinhardtii revealed a network of interactions that establish periodic patterns of MIP binding to the tubulin lattice, providing insight into its ability to withstand mechanical stresses during ciliary beating (Ma et al., 2019). Subsequently, structures of the 48 nm DMT repeat have been determined for human and bovine respiratory cilia (Gui, Farley et al., 2021; Gui, Ma et al., 2021), and the sperm cilia of sea urchin (Leung et al., 2023) and various mammals (Leung et al., 2023; Zhou et al., 2023), providing insight into the evolutionary specialization of DMT structure.
Structures of native axonemal complexes (including dynein motors, radial spokes and the nexin–dynein regulatory complex) followed shortly thereafter, using strategies that either imaged complexes directly on DMTs (Gui, Farley et al., 2021; Walton et al., 2023; Kubo et al., 2023; Ghanaeian et al., 2023) or following biochemical dissociation from the axoneme (Gui, Ma et al., 2021; Rao et al., 2021). These reconstructions were complemented by structures of radial spoke heads prepared through in vitro reconstitution (Grossman-Haham et al., 2021; Zheng et al., 2021). Together with structures of the CA from C. reinhardtii (Gui, Wang et al., 2022; Han et al., 2022), our comprehension of the axoneme at the molecular level has undergone a profound transformation in the past six years.
2.1. Sample preparation for SPA imaging
Early studies of microtubule structure by cryo-EM relied upon in vitro reconstitution (Nogales, 2015); however, this approach is unsuitable for DMTs or the CA due to the large number of microtubule-associated factors and their complex patterns of localization. Instead, studies of axonemal structure have traditionally used native isolation techniques, leveraging the exceptional stability of ciliary microtubules. Motile cilia can be removed from cells by a combination of dibucaine treatment, millimolar levels of Ca2+ or mechanical force, and then crudely separated from cell debris by centrifugation over sucrose cushions (Craige et al., 2013; Beneke et al., 2020). Mild detergent treatment followed by pelleting yields bare axonemes, which must be further broken apart before imaging by SPA to avoid densely overlapping microtubules. The earliest studies of the Tetrahymena DMT by cryo-EM broke the axoneme apart using a combination of ATP and NaCl washes (Ichikawa et al., 2017; Maheshwari et al., 2015). ATP activates the axonemal dyneins to help slide apart the microtubules of the axoneme, while the high-salt washes remove the axonemal dyneins and break the electrostatic interactions that hold neighboring DMTs together. In addition, radial spokes were removed using dialysis of the pelleted DMTs after salt extraction and the DMTs were broken into fragments by sonication.
An alternative to NaCl is to use mild protease digestion to sever the linkages between DMTs, followed by the addition of ATP to telescope apart the axoneme through DMT sliding. This process, called sliding disintegration, has historical precedent in the seminal work of Summers & Gibbons (1971), which corroborated observations by Satir that DMTs move relative to each other during ciliary beating (Satir, 1967). Throughout the decades, a variety of including subtilisin A, which cleaves the tubulin C-terminal tail (Sackett et al., 1985), and reaction conditions have been used to digest the axoneme for biochemical and structural studies. To minimize the damage caused by digestion, sliding disintegration is often performed on ice in the presence of protease inhibitors. This approach yielded the first sub-4 Å resolution structure of the DMT 48 nm repeat (Ma et al., 2019) and, soon after, the radial spoke and CA complexes (Gui, Ma et al., 2021; Gui, Wang et al., 2022).
2.1.1. Axoneme splaying to retain tubulin decoration
A major limitation of cryo-EM sample preparation by salt extraction or sliding disintegration is the loss of, or damage to, axonemal complexes, which hindered structural determination of the docking and regulatory interactions that are important for ciliary beating. An alternative approach with the potential to retain more native interactions was suggested by studies of in vitro reactivation of ciliary beating in detergent-extracted cell models and isolated axonemes (Kamiya & Okagaki, 1986; Aoyama & Kamiya, 2005; Mukundan et al., 2014). Prolonged reactivation with exogenous ATP resulted in fraying of the axoneme distal end, and sometimes extensive splaying along the length of the axoneme. This splaying was exacerbated by mutations in the N-DRC, which links neighboring DMTs together through electrostatic interactions involving tubulin glutamylation (Bower et al., 2013; Alford et al., 2016). Optimization of in vitro reactivation conditions, such as the ATP, calcium and axoneme concentrations, for cryo-EM of wild-type axonemes led to structures of outer dynein arms (ODAs) natively docked onto DMTs (Walton et al., 2021; Kubo et al., 2021), and eventually the near-total complement of axonemal complexes in the 96 nm repeat network (Walton et al., 2023). These findings indicate that axoneme splaying largely preserves the 96 nm repeat, making it a valuable method to study DMT structure.
2.1.2. Central apparatus extrusion
An elegant approach to preparing the CA for cryo-EM analysis entails its enrichment through ATP-induced extrusion from isolated axonemes without protease treatment. Early work demonstrated that ATP-induced reactivation of isolated axonemes first causes projection and rotation of the CA and that this process can be driven to completely eject the CA from the axoneme (Kamiya, 1982). A recent cryo-EM study of the CA improved the extrusion protocol by using multiple additions of ATP and prolonged incubation to enhance the yield (Han et al., 2022). Low-speed centrifugation removed bundles of DMTs, and the supernatant was then centrifuged at higher speeds to concentrate the CA microtubules for cryo-EM grids. Note that this approach may only work for species that have CAs that are capable of rotating.
2.2. Cryo-EM image processing
To reconstruct the DMT, a specialized image-processing pipeline is required due to the periodic nature of axonemal complexes bound to the tubulin surface. This processing differs from the microtubule-reconstruction methods developed for cytosolic microtubules (Zhang & Nogales, 2015; Cook et al., 2020), which are primarily concerned with determining the number of protofilaments (as cytosolic and especially in vitro reconstituted microtubules can have variable numbers of protofilaments) and the location of the microtubule seam (a break in the helical symmetry of the filament where heterotypic α–β and β–α lateral contacts occur) (Chrétien & Wade, 1991; Kikkawa et al., 1994; Ray et al., 1993; Kellogg et al., 2017). Neither of these concerns are particularly relevant to DMTs, which have a set number of protofilaments distributed between A and B tubules, and large projections that create features that preclude the need to specifically locate the seam. In this section, we will outline the image-processing workflow used to reconstruct the axonemal DMT (Fig. 2).
2.2.1. Data collection
The main challenge for most SPA data collections is identifying regions of the grid that have suitably thin ice and contain enough particles for imaging. A similar process must be performed for samples containing axonemal DMTs and CAs. Typically, the concentrations of these large filaments are relatively low to avoid crossovers and bundling, which means that some grid holes will be empty. However, because DMTs and CAs are large, with individual DMTs measuring 30 nm in width and several micrometres in length, each filament can be seen at medium magnification (Fig. 2), allowing users to target the sample by selecting holes that contain DMTs or manually deselecting holes without sample. Despite being time-consuming, this process ensures that most images contain samples suitable for image processing.
2.2.2. Particle picking
Particle picking is a vital step in any cryo-EM image-processing workflow, crucially selecting the particle projections to be aligned later. It is important to select particles of interest while minimizing the inclusion of false positives. Picking filaments is particularly challenging due to the need to avoid crossed or overlapping filaments. Although manual selection of the start and end points of filaments remains perhaps the most accurate method of particle picking for filaments, high-throughput data sets of tens of thousands of images renders this time-intensive method impractical in many cases. Because of this, numerous automatic particle-picking software have arisen in recent years that work at human levels of accuracy, but at a much faster pace. Both template/blob pickers (for example the cryoSPARC filament tracer) and deep-learning-based particle-picking programs (for example crYOLO) have successfully been used to pick DMT particles (Leung et al., 2023; Zhou et al., 2023; Fig. 2a).
In addition to `off-the-shelf' automated particle-picking algorithms, other pipelines have been made specifically for microtubule-bound complexes. For example, the Zhang laboratory has developed a pipeline for the accurate particle picking of microtubules bound by proteins in a process called `multi-curve' fitting (Chai et al., 2022). In this workflow, `seeding particles' are initially picked using conventional methods. Once a seeding particle has successfully been found, filaments are traced by absorbing the nearest individual particles. Distances between particles and fitting errors between them are used as criteria to accept the growing filaments, resulting in the identification of microtubule filaments despite their curvature or associated proteins. The development of multiple automated approaches means that the picking of DMT filaments is now no longer a bottleneck in the cryo-EM processing pipeline.
2.2.3. Determination of 48 and 96 nm repeat structures
After selecting filaments from the micrographs, they are cut into 8 nm overlapping segments during particle extraction to match the periodicity of the α/β-tubulin heterodimer (Fig. 2b). Initial alignments of these particles, in which each 8 nm segment is treated as a conventional single particle, can be performed in FREALIGN (Grigorieff, 2016), RELION (Zivanov et al., 2018, 2022) or cryoSPARC (Punjani et al., 2017), and should resolve the A and B tubules of the DMT with a periodicity of 8 nm. The quality of the initial alignment can be gauged by inspecting the inner junction, a repetitive pattern of FAP20 and PACRG linking the A and B tubules (Fig. 2c). Subsequent classification on the inner junction can identify misaligned or damaged particles for removal at this step. In practice, this 8 nm reconstruction lacks clear density for most of the associated MIPs and axonemal complexes, which have higher order periodicities. The lack of these features is caused by averaging particles from 12 different registers of the 96 nm repeat. The challenge of the DMT image-processing workflow is to resolve the higher periodicity features by progressively identifying the periodicity of each particle.
Existing knowledge of the DMT structure has been key to achieving high-order periodic reconstructions. Tomographic studies have shown that internal MIPs have specific periodicities, such as 16 and 48 nm, whereas external axonemal complexes have periodicities of 24 and 96 nm (Nicastro et al., 2006, 2011; Sui & Downing, 2006). Given that the locations of these densities within the DMT are known, targeted classifications at these markers can be used to determine the periodicity of particles. To make this process manageable, we have observed that identifying and obtaining reconstructions at progressively higher periodicities of up to 96 nm is the best practice (Fig. 2b). For example, from initial 8 nm reconstructions, we can classify on the well known 16 nm MIP FAP52, which is situated in the B tubule adjacent to the inner junction. The resulting classification should yield two well resolved classes showing FAP52 and other 16 nm MIP densities, offset by 8 nm. Once these classes have been resolved, they can be combined by shifting one set of the particles by 8 nm. There are multiple methods for shifting particles, but utilizing the re-extraction and re-centering feature in RELION offers a convenient approach. Post-merging, it is important to remove any duplicated particles to prevent overinflated resolution estimations. Subsequent of the merged particle set will result in a 16 nm reconstruction with conspicuous density for 16 nm periodic components and diffuse density for higher periodic components. This process of classification on known components followed by particle merging is the basis for reconstructing higher order periodic components of the DMT, eventually leading to the 96 nm repeat. From the 16 nm reconstruction, the 48 nm repeat can be obtained by classifying on FAP67, an A-tubule MIP which in C. reinhardtii has two copies within a 48 nm repeat (Ma et al., 2019). From the 48 nm reconstruction, the 96 nm repeat can be obtained by focusing classification on the external radial spoke complexes, which exhibit periodicities of 96 nm. For certain components such as the ODAs, with a 24 nm repeat (Walton et al., 2021), achieving their specific periodicity may be sufficient to produce adequate maps for model building without needing to resolve higher periodicities (Fig. 2b).
An important caveat to these classifications is that due to poor initial 8 nm alignment of DMT samples, many particles can be unnecessarily discarded. This can reduce the number of particles included in the final higher periodicity reconstructions, limiting the resolution and map quality. To mitigate this issue, a shifting strategy can be implemented to retain more particles. In this scheme, the coordinates of the final particles are used to locate adjacent positions on the same DMT filaments (Walton et al., 2021, 2023). By inheriting alignment parameters from neighboring `well behaved' particles, these particles can be added to the data set, with duplicates deleted, and contribute to final reconstructions to produce higher quality maps.
2.2.4. Focused refinements
Due to the considerable size of the 96 nm repeat of the DMT, computational constraints preclude the high-resolution reconstruction of the full complex. In addition, local flexibility, differences in the occupancy of axonemal components and local misalignments produce resolution variations across the DMT reconstruction. To ameliorate these issues, it is advisable to focus on individual axonemal complexes by particle subtraction, classification and refinement. By concentrating in silico by combining each sub-refinement, yielding a much-improved final map. Such schemes have been very successful in producing reconstructions that are suitable for atomic model building (Walton et al., 2023; Gui, Wang et al., 2022; Han et al., 2022).
on individual subregions, the map quality and resolution can improve dramatically. The full complex can then be reconstitutedSub-refinements were first applied to the 48 nm reconstruction of the C. reinhardtii DMT (Ma et al., 2019). Here, the DMT was divided into subregions using ten cylindrical masks that each contained two or three protofilaments. Each subregion was subsequently divided into top, middle and bottom sections using shorter cylindrical masks to create a total of 30 subregions. Each subregion was subtracted from the consensus reconstruction and refined individually. By focusing alignment on these local regions, the resolution and map quality of the tubulin and associated proteins improved substantially. The improved maps were aligned and resampled to the 48 nm consensus reconstruction and merged together by taking the maximum density value at each voxel in ChimeraX (Pettersen et al., 2021). Alternatively, Phenix offers the tool combine_focused_maps that combines focused cryo-EM maps using models to align them (Liebschner et al., 2019). This method was successfully used to merge focused maps from the T. thermophila DMT (Kubo et al., 2023).
This focused C. reinhardtii and human respiratory DMTs (Walton et al., 2023).
strategy can also be implemented for axonemal complexes bound to the exterior of the DMT or CA microtubules. Because many of these complexes project far from the microtubule surface, they are more flexible and may have lower occupancy due to damage during sample preparation and grid freezing. It follows that subtraction and subsequent focused 3D classification and will improve the resolution and quality of these regions. This strategy was successful in resolving the structures of each axonemal complex with 96 nm periodicity to produce a composite reconstruction of the full repeat in bothIn addition to improving map quality, particle classification after signal subtraction and focused C. reinhardtii IDAf and N-DRC revealed multiple conformation states that are coupled to movement of adjacent ODAs and which may be important for the mechanism of ODA activation (Walton et al., 2023). Applying this workflow to other parts of the axoneme may uncover additional conformational states.
can reveal conformational heterogeneity. For example, extensive classification ofSignal subtraction can also be used to improve the alignments of axonemal complexes by subtracting the microtubule signal directly. In many cases, the DMT dominates alignments, smearing the alignment of bound complexes, especially if they project far from the surface of the DMT. In a method developed by the Zhang group, subtraction of the DMT density directly from micrographs after 4 nm sampling and tracing of the filaments can yield large improvements in the alignment of the bound complexes (Chai et al., 2022). This method produced suitable 2D class averages and high-resolution reconstructions of ODAs reconstituted on microtubules. A similar method of tubulin subtraction was used to resolve the structure of a cytoskeletal dynein–dynactin in the presence of an adaptor bound to microtubules (Chaaban & Carter, 2022). Overall, signal subtraction, followed by focused and classification, can greatly improve the map resolution and quality of axonemal complexes to allow model building.
3. Protein identification and model building
3.1. Protein identification pre-AlphaFold
The first ∼3.5 Å resolution structure of a DMT presented a formidable model-building challenge (Ma et al., 2019). Although the tubulin component could easily be modeled by substituting the sequence from previously solved cytosolic microtubule structures and manually refitting the model to the map, the dozens of MIPs had to be identified directly from the cryo-EM density. For globular MIP densities, the MOLREP–BALBES pipeline, a density-based fold-recognition workflow (Brown et al., 2015; Vagin & Teplyakov, 2010), was used (Fig. 3a, left). In this workflow, MIP densities were extracted from the composite map and each entry in the BALBES database (Long et al., 2008), a database of unique protein folds derived from the Protein Data Bank (PDB), was systematically fitted to the extracted densities using MOLREP (Vagin & Teplyakov, 2010). The solutions were then ranked and the top hits manually inspected to identify the best-fitting domain. Cross-referencing the recognized fold with mass-spectrometric analysis of the cryo-EM sample typically identified a MIP with a similar domain, while side-chain analysis differentiated the correct solution. This semi-automated approach was successful in identifying FAP67, FAP161, RIB72, FAP363, FAP182 and multiple EF-hand motifs (Ma et al., 2019). Once the proteins have been identified in one species, homology-modeling programs such as SWISS-MODEL and I-TASSER (Schwede et al., 2003; Zhang, 2008) can be used to build starting models for DMTs from other species.
Nonglobular and remaining MIP densities were built de novo (Fig. 3a, right), starting with polyalanine traces built manually in graphical programs such as Coot (Emsley et al., 2010). These initial traces were then used as templates to assign side chains or secondary structure: MIPs could be identified by comparing the assigned sequence against proteomes (either of the whole organism or a subset of proteins obtained from mass-spectrometric analysis of the sample) or comparing the secondary-structure profile with predictions. The traced models could also be used as an input for search programs such as PDBeFold (Krissinel & Henrick, 2004) and DALI (Holm, 2022) to identify structurally similar proteins pre-existing in the PDB. As in the example of the MOLREP–BALBES pipeline, knowledge of the protein fold can be used to identify proteins with similar domains in the mass-spectrometric results, simplifying the search space. The recent development of Foldseek means that this approach can now be used to search millions of predicted structures (van Kempen et al., 2024).
3.2. Developments in protein identification and model building
More recently, advances in protein-structure prediction and automated model building have upended these past workflows to allow the rapid identification of unknown protein densities (Fig. 3b). Arguably the most transformative advance has been the development of AlphaFold2 (Jumper et al., 2021) and similar neural network-based methods for structure prediction. The ability to rapidly predict protein structures directly from primary sequences now makes it feasible to create or simply download structural libraries of nearly every protein in the proteome of an organism. This expansion of confident protein predictions can be leveraged to identify unknown density in cryo-EM maps. For example, the BALBES database can be substituted with an AlphaFold2 library in domain-recognition workflows, providing a way to perform domain-based recognition with entire proteomes (Fig. 3b, left). This approach, using COLORES (Wriggers et al., 1999) as the search program, was recently used to identify CCDC105 and other MIPs in the cryo-ET density of the mouse sperm DMT (Chen, Shiozaki et al., 2023; Fig. 4). Importantly, the success of fold recognition is often more dependent on the quality of the starting models than having high-resolution features. AlphaFold2 has therefore opened the door to identifying axonemal proteins within lower resolution maps, although without side-chain-level details the risk of misidentification remains, especially among paralogous proteins.
Equally as impactful has been the emergence of de novo model-building software such as DeepTracer (Pfab et al., 2021; Chang et al., 2022) and ModelAngelo (Jamali et al., 2024) that exploit deep-learning methods and can build into any cryo-EM density with resolved side chains, regardless of sequence information (Fig. 3b, right). One of the advantages of these approaches, as well as model-building aids such as findMySequence (Chojnowski et al., 2022), is that they calculate probabilities for all 20 amino acids for each built residue of every chain. These probability profiles provide better queries for protein identification than single solutions (Mistry et al., 2013). The power of this approach was illustrated by the identification of four radial spoke proteins (now referred to as RSP24, RSP25, RSP26 and RSP27) and two CA proteins (FAP92 and FAP374) that were unable to be assigned using traditional approaches (Jamali et al., 2024). The development of AlphaFold2 and automated model-building software have not only impacted the field of cilia biology but also the structural biology of large protein assemblies in general.
3.3. Model of axonemal complexes
Refining atomic models of axonemal complexes remains a substantial challenge because of their size and the fact that the composite maps exhibit a large range of local resolutions. For the 96 nm repeat of the DMT, its large size prevents
of the complex as a single model even after reducing the map dimensions to the smallest cuboid capable of containing the full length of the repeat. Because of these issues, models of 96 nm axonemal assemblies currently need be split into local regions and refined into the cryo-EM density as separate subregions. To allow the refined models to be recombined into a full assembly, these subregions must overlap to avoid the introduction of unrefined interfaces.4. Cryo-ET makes its comeback
Although SPA reconstructions have broken through resolution barriers to describe DMT complexes at sub-4 Å resolution, recent breakthroughs have primed cryo-ET to return as the premier method for imaging native axonemes at high resolution. This section will highlight recent advances in cryo-ET imaging of axonemes and explore its exciting potential.
4.1. Using cryo-ET to study axonemes at high resolution
By the mid-2010s, SPA cryo-EM could yield resolutions of ∼3 Å for protein complexes, yet cryo-ET and subtomogram averaging was limited to subnanometre resolution only for large, highly symmetric complexes in thin ice (Kühlbrandt, 2014). The additional generated by thicker ice (>100 nm) and the electron damage caused by repeated imaging during tilt-series acquisition precluded high-resolution reconstructions for most cryo-ET samples. A leap towards subnanometre-resolution reconstructions of the axoneme was achieved in 2019 by combining the strengths of cryo-ET with SPA cryo-EM through a process called Tomography-Guided 3D Reconstruction of Subcellular Structures or TYGRESS (Song et al., 2020). TYGRESS involves acquiring two data sets per target: firstly a single image at 0° tilt with a high dose and secondly a traditional tilt series captured at a lower dose. Following collection, the tilt series is used to create subtomogram averages, from which 3D coordinates and alignment angles are extracted. The 3D coordinates are subsequently used to pick particles from the 0° tilt, high-dose image and obtain alignment angles to initialize with SPA methods. Therefore, using this method, the 3D position and initial alignments of each particle are derived from the tilt series, while the higher signal-to-noise ratio 0° initial image is used for high-resolution reconstruction. This general method is particularly well suited to determining structures from highly crowded micrographs. Applied to the T. thermophila axoneme, TYGRESS was able to reconstruct the DMT to an average resolution of 12 Å, a significant improvement at the time that clearly resolved individual subcomplexes and some large MIPs (Song et al., 2020). Although impressive, these reconstructions did not allow accurate atomic model building.
Subsequent improvements in cryo-ET methodology have produced several subnanometre reconstructions of sperm DMTs, including ∼5 Å resolution reconstructions of mouse sperm DMTs (Chen, Shiozaki et al., 2023; Chen, Greenan et al., 2023; Tai et al., 2023; Fig. 4a). This work has opened the possibility of studying ciliary axonemes by cryo-ET at high resolution. One major advance was the introduction of focused ion-beam (FIB) milling of cryopreserved whole sperm cells to create electron-penetrative lamella. This results in intact axonemes in relatively thin ice with improved signal-to-noise ratios. Axonemes prepared in this way are also typically less `flattened' than when prepared by freezing isolated cilia directly onto cryo-EM grids (Tai et al., 2023), helping to preserve the geometry of the axoneme and limit damage to the DMTs. Additionally, cryo-ET image-processing workflows have improved by drawing on principles from SPA studies. For studies of DMTs that have resulted in reconstructions below 10 Å, alignments of subtomograms were performed in RELION-3 or RELION-4, which use a Bayesian statistical approach to align particles based on maximizing the likelihood given the observed data and prior information (Zivanov et al., 2018, 2022). Recent versions of RELION include cryo-ET-specific tools, such as CtfRefineTomo and TomoFrameAlign, that promise to improve reconstructions further. Excitingly, this resolution breakthrough promises to improve our understanding of axonemal structures in their native environment.
4.2. Cryo-ET and axoneme asymmetry
With the dawn of high-resolution cryo-ET imaging of intact cilia, native features such axoneme asymmetry may be observed. Asymmetry underlies many important features of axonemes in different species, such as the DMT–fibrous sheath connections in mammalian sperm, the DMT–paraflagellar rod connections in trypanosomatid-family parasites, and several noted radial asymmetries in C. reinhardtii (Dutcher, 2020; Bastin et al., 1998; Baccetti & Afzelius, 1976). Unfortunately, one of the limitations of SPA cryo-EM is that by deconstructing the axoneme into its constituent filaments, the 9 + 2 organization is destroyed and asymmetrical features of distinct DMT microtubules are averaged and lost. Cryo-ET of native axonemes avoids this issue. One recent example is the cryo-ET study of FIB-milled mouse sperm axonemes, in which separate reconstructions of each DMT revealed that only some have radial spokes associated with a large barrel that may have a role in regulating the sperm-specific asymmetric waveform (Chen, Greenan et al., 2023). Although axoneme asymmetries have been observed for decades, their molecular basis and function are only now coming into focus through recent improvements in resolution and map quality.
4.3. Uncovering transient structures on the axoneme
Cryo-ET has also been central to determining structures of the intraflagellar transport (IFT) A and B cargo-trafficking complexes, which transiently associate with the axoneme. These complexes form long oligomers, termed trains, that assemble at the base of the cilium and traffic cargo to the tip in a kinesin-dependent translocation on DMTs called anterograde trafficking. Upon reaching the tip, the train reassembles and returns to the base in a dynein-dependent process termed retrograde transport. Tomographic analysis has now observed IFT trains in C. reinhardtii assembling at the base of the cilium (van den Hoek et al., 2022) and during active anterograde transport (Lacey et al., 2023; Jordan et al., 2018). Subtomogram averaging applied to the anterograde train achieved a nearly subnanometre resolution, allowing model building (Lacey et al., 2023) that was supported by contemporary single-particle methods (Meleppattu et al., 2022; Jiang et al., 2023; Ma et al., 2023). This work opens the door to capturing the structures of active processes taking place on the axoneme. Future structures of the retrograde IFT train and trains associated with specific cargos have the potential to offer enormous insight into the process of protein trafficking in cilia.
4.4. Cryo-ET and primary cilia
Cryo-ET, and the wider techniques of volume et al., 2020) and serial section-imaging studies of IMCD3 kidney cells (Sun et al., 2019) and C. elegans primary cilia (Doroquez et al., 2014) have demonstrated that the structures of these axonemes are unconventional, with large radial differences in their organization and DMTs that rapidly taper into singlet microtubules. Future subtomogram averaging of the microtubules of primary cilia should provide new information about their microtubule-associated proteins, about which very little is currently known. Because cells typically have only one primary cilium, fluorescent markers may be useful to help focus imaging on intact FIB-milled primary cilia.
(vEM), also provide suitable methods to image primary cilia. Although it is a convention to describe primary cilia as having a 9 + 0 architecture, tomography on primary cilia isolated from MCDK-II cells (Kiesel5. Conclusions
In the past decade, SPA cryo-EM has invigorated the field of ciliary structural biology by allowing the determination of maps with sufficient resolution to build atomic models that have uncovered the identities, locations and interactions of hundreds of axonemal proteins from an array of species and cell types. This information has provided a foundation to understand the molecular effects of ciliopathies and has revolutionized the field more broadly from working with low-resolution information to specific, residue-level interactions. In the next decade, developments in cryo-ET methods and AI-driven software improvements will address questions of in situ axoneme biology. We can look forward to high-resolution structures of axonemes in different functional states, resolving the molecular details of axonemal asymmetry, and observing the relationship between motile and primary cilia and their molecular environment (Müller et al., 2023; Sheu et al., 2022).
Footnotes
‡These authors made equal contributions.
Funding information
This work was funded by The National Institute of General Medical Sciences (grants R01-GM141109 and R01-GM143183).
References
Afzelius, B. A. (1955). Z. Zellforsch. Mikrosk. Anat. 42, 134–148. CrossRef PubMed CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Alford, L. M., Stoddard, D., Li, J. H., Hunter, E. L., Tritschler, D., Bower, R., Nicastro, D., Porter, M. E. & Sale, W. S. (2016). Cytoskeleton, 73, 331–340. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Aoyama, S. & Kamiya, R. (2005). Biophys. J. 89, 3261–3268. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Baccetti, B. & Afzelius, B. A. (1976). Monogr. Dev. Biol., pp. 1–254. Google Scholar
Barnes, B. G. (1961). J. Ultrastruct. Res. 5, 453–467. CrossRef PubMed CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Bastin, P., Sherwin, T. & Gull, K. (1998). Nature, 391, 548. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Beneke, T., Demay, F., Wheeler, R. J. & Gluenz, E. (2020). Methods Mol. Biol. 2116, 485–495. CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Bower, R., Tritschler, D., VanderWaal, K., Perrone, C. A., Mueller, J., Fox, L., Sale, W. S. & Porter, M. E. (2013). Mol. Biol. Cell, 24, 1134–1152. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Bozkurt, H. H. & Woolley, D. M. (1993). Cell Motil. Cytoskeleton, 24, 109–118. CAS PubMed Web of Science Google Scholar
Brown, A., Long, F., Nicholls, R. A., Toots, J., Emsley, P. & Murshudov, G. (2015). Acta Cryst. D71, 136–153. Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Bui, K. H., Yagi, T., Yamamoto, R., Kamiya, R. & Ishikawa, T. (2012). J. Cell Biol. 198, 913–925. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Chaaban, S. & Carter, A. P. (2022). Nature, 610, 212–216. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Chai, P., Rao, Q. & Zhang, K. (2022). J. Struct. Biol. 214, 107897. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Chang, L., Wang, F., Connolly, K., Meng, H., Su, Z., Cvirkaite-Krupovic, V., Krupovic, M., Egelman, E. H. & Si, D. (2022). Biophys. J. 121, 2840–2848. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Chen, Z., Greenan, G. A., Shiozaki, M., Liu, Y., Skinner, W. M., Zhao, X., Zhao, S., Yan, R., Yu, Z., Lishko, P. V., Agard, D. A. & Vale, R. D. (2023). Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 30, 360–369. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Chen, Z., Shiozaki, M., Haas, K. M., Skinner, W. M., Zhao, S., Guo, C., Polacco, B. J., Yu, Z., Krogan, N. J., Lishko, P. V., Kaake, R. M., Vale, R. D. & Agard, D. A. (2023). Cell, 186, 5041–5053. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Cheng, Y., Grigorieff, N., Penczek, P. A. & Walz, T. (2015). Cell, 161, 438–449. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Chojnowski, G., Simpkin, A. J., Leonardo, D. A., Seifert-Davila, W., Vivas-Ruiz, D. E., Keegan, R. M. & Rigden, D. J. (2022). IUCrJ, 9, 86–97. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Chrétien, D. & Wade, R. H. (1991). Biol. Cell, 71, 161–174. PubMed Web of Science Google Scholar
Cook, A. D., Manka, S. W., Wang, S., Moores, C. A. & Atherton, J. (2020). J. Struct. Biol. 209, 107402. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Craige, B., Brown, J. M. & Witman, G. B. (2013). Curr. Protoc. Cell. Biol. 59, 3.41.1–3.41.9. CrossRef Google Scholar
Doroquez, D. B., Berciu, C., Anderson, J. R., Sengupta, P. & Nicastro, D. (2014). eLife, 3, e01948. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Dutcher, S. K. (2020). Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B, 375, 20190153. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Emsley, P., Lohkamp, B., Scott, W. G. & Cowtan, K. (2010). Acta Cryst. D66, 486–501. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Fawcett, D. W. & Porter, K. R. (1954). J. Morphol. 94, 221–281. CrossRef Web of Science Google Scholar
Ghanaeian, A., Majhi, S., McCafferty, C. L., Nami, B., Black, C. S., Yang, S. K., Legal, T., Papoulas, O., Janowska, M., Valente-Paterno, M., Marcotte, E. M., Wloga, D. & Bui, K. H. (2023). Nat. Commun. 14, 5741. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Grigorieff, N. (2016). Methods Enzymol. 579, 191–226. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Grossman-Haham, I., Coudray, N., Yu, Z., Wang, F., Zhang, N., Bhabha, G. & Vale, R. D. (2021). Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 28, 20–28. Web of Science CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Gui, M., Croft, J. T., Zabeo, D., Acharya, V., Kollman, J. M., Burgoyne, T., Höög, J. L. & Brown, A. (2022). Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 119, e2207605119. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Gui, M., Farley, H., Anujan, P., Anderson, J. R., Maxwell, D. W., Whitchurch, J. B., Botsch, J. J., Qiu, T., Meleppattu, S., Singh, S. K., Zhang, Q., Thompson, J., Lucas, J. S., Bingle, C. D., Norris, D. P., Roy, S. & Brown, A. (2021). Cell, 184, 5791–5806. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Gui, M., Ma, M., Sze-Tu, E., Wang, X., Koh, F., Zhong, E. D., Berger, B., Davis, J. H., Dutcher, S. K., Zhang, R. & Brown, A. (2021). Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 28, 29–37. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Gui, M., Wang, X., Dutcher, S. K., Brown, A. & Zhang, R. (2022). Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 29, 483–492. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Han, L., Rao, Q., Yang, R., Wang, Y., Chai, P., Xiong, Y. & Zhang, K. (2022). Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 29, 472–482. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Hoek, H. van den, Klena, N., Jordan, M. A., Alvarez Viar, G., Righetto, R. D., Schaffer, M., Erdmann, P. S., Wan, W., Geimer, S., Plitzko, J. M., Baumeister, W., Pigino, G., Hamel, V., Guichard, P. & Engel, B. D. (2022). Science, 377, 543–548. Web of Science PubMed Google Scholar
Holm, L. (2022). Nucleic Acids Res. 50, W210–W215. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Ichikawa, M., Khalifa, A. A. Z., Kubo, S., Dai, D., Basu, K., Maghrebi, M. A. F., Vargas, J. & Bui, K. H. (2019). Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 116, 19930–19938. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Ichikawa, M., Liu, D., Kastritis, P. L., Basu, K., Hsu, T. C., Yang, S. & Bui, K. H. (2017). Nat. Commun. 8, 15035. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Jamali, K., Käll, L., Zhang, R., Brown, A., Kimanius, D. & Scheres, S. H. W. (2024). Nature, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-07215-4. Google Scholar
Jiang, M., Palicharla, V. R., Miller, D., Hwang, S.-H., Zhu, H., Hixson, P., Mukhopadhyay, S. & Sun, J. (2023). Cell Res. 33, 288–298. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Jordan, M. A., Diener, D. R., Stepanek, L. & Pigino, G. (2018). Nat. Cell Biol. 20, 1250–1255. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., Bridgland, A., Meyer, C., Kohl, S. A. A., Ballard, A. J., Cowie, A., Romera-Paredes, B., Nikolov, S., Jain, R., Adler, J., Back, T., Petersen, S., Reiman, D., Clancy, E., Zielinski, M., Steinegger, M., Pacholska, M., Berghammer, T., Bodenstein, S., Silver, D., Vinyals, O., Senior, A. W., Kavukcuoglu, K., Kohli, P. & Hassabis, D. (2021). Nature, 596, 583–589. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Kamiya, R. (1982). Prog. Clin. Biol. Res. 80, 169–173. CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Kamiya, R. & Okagaki, T. (1986). Cell Motil. Cytoskeleton, 6, 580–585. CrossRef Web of Science Google Scholar
Kellogg, E. H., Hejab, N. M. A., Howes, S., Northcote, P., Miller, J. H., Díaz, J. F., Downing, K. H. & Nogales, E. (2017). J. Mol. Biol. 429, 633–646. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Kempen, M. van, Kim, S. S., Tumescheit, C., Mirdita, M., Lee, J., Gilchrist, C. L. M., Söding, J. & Steinegger, M. (2024). Nat. Biotechnol. 42, 243–246. Web of Science PubMed Google Scholar
Khalifa, A. A. Z., Ichikawa, M., Dai, D., Kubo, S., Black, C. S., Peri, K., McAlear, T. S., Veyron, S., Yang, S. K., Vargas, J., Bechstedt, S., Trempe, J.-F. & Bui, K. H. (2020). eLife, 9, e52760. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Kiesel, P., Alvarez Viar, G., Tsoy, N., Maraspini, R., Gorilak, P., Varga, V., Honigmann, A. & Pigino, G. (2020). Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 27, 1115–1124. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Kikkawa, M., Ishikawa, T., Nakata, T., Wakabayashi, T. & Hirokawa, N. (1994). J. Cell Biol. 127, 1965–1971. CrossRef CAS PubMed Web of Science Google Scholar
Krissinel, E. & Henrick, K. (2004). Acta Cryst. D60, 2256–2268. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Kubo, S., Black, C. S., Joachimiak, E., Yang, S. K., Legal, T., Peri, K., Khalifa, A. A. Z., Ghanaeian, A., McCafferty, C. L., Valente-Paterno, M., De Bellis, C., Huynh, P. M., Fan, Z., Marcotte, E. M., Wloga, D. & Bui, K. H. (2023). Nat. Commun. 14, 2168. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Kubo, S., Yang, S. K., Black, C. S., Dai, D., Valente-Paterno, M., Gaertig, J., Ichikawa, M. & Bui, K. H. (2021). EMBO Rep. 22, e52911. Google Scholar
Kühlbrandt, W. (2014). Science, 343, 1443–1444. Web of Science PubMed Google Scholar
Lacey, S. E., Foster, H. E. & Pigino, G. (2023). Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 30, 584–593. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Leung, M. R., Zeng, J., Wang, X., Roelofs, M. C., Huang, W., Zenezini Chiozzi, R., Hevler, J. F., Heck, A. J. R., Dutcher, S. K., Brown, A., Zhang, R. & Zeev-Ben-Mordehai, T. (2023). Cell, 186, 2880–2896. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Liebschner, D., Afonine, P. V., Baker, M. L., Bunkóczi, G., Chen, V. B., Croll, T. I., Hintze, B., Hung, L.-W., Jain, S., McCoy, A. J., Moriarty, N. W., Oeffner, R. D., Poon, B. K., Prisant, M. G., Read, R. J., Richardson, J. S., Richardson, D. C., Sammito, M. D., Sobolev, O. V., Stockwell, D. H., Terwilliger, T. C., Urzhumtsev, A. G., Videau, L. L., Williams, C. J. & Adams, P. D. (2019). Acta Cryst. D75, 861–877. Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Long, F., Vagin, A. A., Young, P. & Murshudov, G. N. (2008). Acta Cryst. D64, 125–132. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Ma, M., Stoyanova, M., Rademacher, G., Dutcher, S. K., Brown, A. & Zhang, R. (2019). Cell, 179, 909–922. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Ma, Y., He, J., Li, S., Yao, D., Huang, C., Wu, J. & Lei, M. (2023). Nat. Commun. 14, 1506. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Maheshwari, A., Obbineni, J. M., Bui, K. H., Shibata, K., Toyoshima, Y. Y. & Ishikawa, T. (2015). Structure, 23, 1584–1595. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Meleppattu, S., Zhou, H., Dai, J., Gui, M. & Brown, A. (2022). Cell, 185, 4986–4998. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Mistry, J., Finn, R. D., Eddy, S. R., Bateman, A. & Punta, M. (2013). Nucleic Acids Res. 41, e121. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Mukundan, V., Sartori, P., Geyer, V. F., Jülicher, F. & Howard, J. (2014). Biophys. J. 106, 2434–2442. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Müller, A., Klena, N., Pang, S., Galicia Garcia, L. E., Sulaymankhil, D., Topcheva, O., Seliskar, M., Mziaut, H., Schöniger, E., Friedland, D., Kipke, N., Kretschmar, S., Münster, C., Weitz, J., Distler, M., Kurth, T., Schmidt, D., Hess, H. F., Xu, C. S., Pigino, G. & Solimena, M. (2023). bioRxiv, 2023.12.01.568979. Google Scholar
Nicastro, D., Fu, X., Heuser, T., Tso, A., Porter, M. E. & Linck, R. W. (2011). Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 108, e845. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Nicastro, D., McIntosh, J. R. & Baumeister, W. (2005). Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 102, 15889–15894. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Nicastro, D., Schwartz, C., Pierson, J., Gaudette, R., Porter, M. E. & McIntosh, J. R. (2006). Science, 313, 944–948. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Nogales, E. (2015). Protein Sci. 24, 1912–1919. CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Owa, M., Uchihashi, T., Yanagisawa, H., Yamano, T., Iguchi, H., Fukuzawa, H., Wakabayashi, K., Ando, T. & Kikkawa, M. (2019). Nat. Commun. 10, 1143. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Pettersen, E. F., Goddard, T. D., Huang, C. C., Meng, E. C., Couch, G. S., Croll, T. I., Morris, J. H. & Ferrin, T. E. (2021). Protein Sci. 30, 70–82. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Pfab, J., Phan, N. M. & Si, D. (2021). Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 118, e2017525118. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Punjani, A., Rubinstein, J. L., Fleet, D. J. & Brubaker, M. A. (2017). Nat. Methods, 14, 290–296. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Rao, Q., Han, L., Wang, Y., Chai, P., Kuo, Y.-W., Yang, R., Hu, F., Yang, Y., Howard, J. & Zhang, K. (2021). Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 28, 799–810. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Ray, S., Meyhöfer, E., Milligan, R. A. & Howard, J. (1993). J. Cell Biol. 121, 1083–1093. CrossRef CAS PubMed Web of Science Google Scholar
Sackett, D. L., Bhattacharyya, B. & Wolff, J. (1985). J. Biol. Chem. 260, 43–45. CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Satir, P. (1967). J. Gen. Physiol. 50, 241–258. CrossRef Web of Science Google Scholar
Schwede, T., Kopp, J., Guex, N. & Peitsch, M. C. (2003). Nucleic Acids Res. 31, 3381–3385. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Sheu, S.-H., Upadhyayula, S., Dupuy, V., Pang, S., Deng, F., Wan, J., Walpita, D., Pasolli, H. A., Houser, J., Sanchez-Martinez, S., Brauchi, S. E., Banala, S., Freeman, M., Xu, C. S., Kirchhausen, T., Hess, H. F., Lavis, L., Li, Y., Chaumont-Dubel, S. & Clapham, D. E. (2022). Cell, 185, 3390–3407. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Song, K., Shang, Z., Fu, X., Lou, X., Grigorieff, N. & Nicastro, D. (2020). Nat. Methods, 17, 201–208. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Sui, H. & Downing, K. H. (2006). Nature, 442, 475–478. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Summers, K. E. & Gibbons, I. R. (1971). Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 68, 3092–3096. CrossRef CAS PubMed Web of Science Google Scholar
Sun, S., Fisher, R. L., Bowser, S. S., Pentecost, B. T. & Sui, H. (2019). Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 116, 9370–9379. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Tai, L., Yin, G., Huang, X., Sun, F. & Zhu, Y. (2023). Cell. Discov. 9, 116. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Taira, K. & Shibasaki, S. (1978). Arch. Histol. Jpn, 41, 351–366. CrossRef CAS PubMed Web of Science Google Scholar
Vagin, A. & Teplyakov, A. (2010). Acta Cryst. D66, 22–25. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Walton, T., Gui, M., Velkova, S., Fassad, M. R., Hirst, R. A., Haarman, E., O'Callaghan, C., Bottier, M., Burgoyne, T., Mitchison, H. M. & Brown, A. (2023). Nature, 618, 625–633. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Walton, T., Wu, H. & Brown, A. (2021). Nat. Commun. 12, 477. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Witman, G. B., Plummer, J. & Sander, G. (1978). J. Cell Biol. 76, 729–747. CrossRef CAS PubMed Web of Science Google Scholar
Wriggers, W., Milligan, R. A. & McCammon, J. A. (1999). J. Struct. Biol. 125, 185–195. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Zhang, R. & Nogales, E. (2015). J. Struct. Biol. 192, 245–254. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Zhang, Y. (2008). BMC Bioinformatics, 9, 40. Google Scholar
Zheng, W., Li, F., Ding, Z., Liu, H., Zhu, L., Xu, C., Li, J., Gao, Q., Wang, Y., Fu, Z., Peng, C., Yan, X., Zhu, X. & Cong, Y. (2021). Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 118, e2021180118. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Zhou, L., Liu, H., Liu, S., Yang, X., Dong, Y., Pan, Y., Xiao, Z., Zheng, B., Sun, Y., Huang, P., Zhang, X., Hu, J., Sun, R., Feng, S., Zhu, Y., Liu, M., Gui, M. & Wu, J. (2023). Cell, 186, 2897–2910. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Zivanov, J., Nakane, T., Forsberg, B. O., Kimanius, D., Hagen, W. J., Lindahl, E. & Scheres, S. H. W. (2018). eLife, 7, e42166. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Zivanov, J., Otón, J., Ke, Z., von Kügelgen, A., Pyle, E., Qu, K., Morado, D., Castaño-Díez, D., Zanetti, G., Bharat, T. A. M., Briggs, J. A. G. & Scheres, S. H. W. (2022). eLife, 11, e83724. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.