research papers
Biochemical and structural characterization of a tail-spike protein with depolymerase activity identified in a marine podovirus
aSynchrotron SOLEIL, L'Orme des Merisiers, Départementale 128, 91190 Saint-Aubin, France, bSorbonne Université, CNRS, UMR 8227, LBI2M, Station Biologique de Roscoff, 29680 Roscoff, France, and cSorbonne Université, CNRS, UMR 7144, Station Biologique de Roscoff, 29680 Roscoff, France
*Correspondence e-mail: [email protected], [email protected]
Marine phages are, through the infection of their bacterial hosts, key regulators of microbiome and carbon fluxes in the ocean. Despite their important role, the specific molecular mechanisms that underlie infection are so far understudied. Previously, the podovirus Cobetia marina virus 1 (Carin-1), which infects the marine γ-proteobacterium C. marina, was shown to display exopolysaccharide depolymerase activity. This activity is likely to mediate degradation of the host capsule to facilitate access to the bacterial membrane receptor, but no corresponding gene could be annotated in the genome of Carin-1 by comparative genomics. Biochemical characterization enabled assignment of this activity to Dpo31, a protein sharing less than 10% sequence identity with any characterized protein. Here, we report the structural domain organization and biochemical characterization of Dpo31, revealing an overall structure that is analogous to podovirus tail-spike proteins, allowing us to locate the depolymerase activity to the D3 domain and to identify original structural features that explain the absence of detectable similarity at the primary-sequence level.
Keywords: marine phages; podoviruses; EPS depolymerases; tail-spike proteins; crystal structure; SAXS.
PDB references: Dpo31, native, 28lx; ΔD1, 28mg; D4, 28nb
SASBDB references: Dpo31, ΔD1, SASDYX6; D4, SASDYY6; native, SASDYZ6
1. Introduction
The tail structure of bacterial viruses (bacteriophages) that belong to the class Caudoviricetes (previously known as Caudoviridae) is a determinant of host recognition and infection (Labrie et al., 2010
; Leiman & Molineux, 2008
). The tail fibers or tail-spike proteins commonly exhibit depolymerases (Dpos) that are involved in the early steps of infection. These enzymes facilitate the binding and degradation of bacterial host extracellular polysaccharides [capsular polysaccharides (CPS), exopolysaccharides (EPS) or lipopolysaccharide (LPS)] in order to access the bacterial cell wall for DNA injection (Sutherland, 1995
, 1999
; Latka et al., 2017
). Dpos fall into two main enzymatic classes of polysaccharidases, hydrolases and lyases (the latter constituting a large majority of well characterized and experimentally validated depolymerases), that act endolytically, cleaving specific internal glycosidic bonds at multiple positions along the polymer chain (Sutherland, 1995
, 1999
; Latka et al., 2017
; Knecht et al., 2020
). Despite their common biological role, Dpos display a high level of functional and molecular diversity and target various substrates (Latka et al., 2017
; Knecht et al., 2020
). To our knowledge, studies on virus-derived Dpos have largely focused on short-tailed podoviruses that infect pathogenic and biofilm-forming bacteria (Cornelissen et al., 2011
, 2012
; Jia et al., 2025
). More recently, viruses of marine bacteria were also shown to possess depolymerases active against EPS released by their hosts (Lelchat et al., 2019
).
EPS derived from marine bacteria consist mostly of polysaccharides, but also proteins, lipids and DNA. The polysaccharidic moiety displays a wide chemical diversity with homopolymeric or heteropolymeric composition, including numerous rare and specific monosaccharides, linear or branched backbones, and inorganic or organic substituents (Decho & Gutierrez, 2017
; Vincent et al., 1994
; Kokoulin et al., 2014
; Bramhachari & Dubey, 2006
; Drouillard et al., 2018
; Hassler et al., 2011
; Nichols et al., 2005
). Compared with their terrestrial counterparts, EPS released by marine bacteria typically contain more uronic acids (for example D-glucuronic and D-galacturonic acid; Chi & Fang, 2005
; Delbarre-Ladrat et al., 2014
) that provide them a negative charge and serve important ecological functions. The polyanionic nature of bacterial EPS was shown to facilitate microbial adhesion and biofilm formation, and to mediate the binding and the fate of trace metal nutrients in marine systems, while the poor reactivity of bacterial EPS to microbial degradation is related to the chemical and structural complexity of these molecules and the diversity of bacteria that produce them (Decho & Gutierrez, 2017
).
Carin-1, a short-tailed virus (podovirus) that infects the marine bacterium Cobetia marina, encodes a large protein, Dpo31, that at the sequence level shows very little similarity to any other characterized protein in public databases. We show here that Dpo31 displays EPS-lytic activity and a three-dimensional structural organization resembling that of typical tail-spike proteins. The overall structure of the bacteriophage Carin-1 was previously solved by cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM), highlighting the position of Dpo31 on the tail fibers with the depolymerase activity located at the distal end of the tail structure (d'Acapito et al., 2023
). The crystal structure revealed a trimeric, multi-modular composition with a straight, elongated arrangement. In contrast, small-angle scattering analyses of Dpo31 in solution supported kinked or bent envelopes, which are more consistent with the configuration of the protein on the virion structure solved by cryo-EM. To identify distinct functions of the individual domains, particularly those responsible for hydrolytic activity, we generated a series of constructs that either isolated individual domains or lacked specific domains. Heterologous expression of truncated variants of Dpo31 revealed that the enzymatic activity is carried by the central module designated domain 3 (D3).
2. Methods
2.1. Bacterial and viral strains
Cobetia marina (DSMZ 4741) is naturally infected by Carin-1, a short-tailed virus (podovirus) isolated from the surface water of the bay of Brest at the long-term monitoring station SOMLIT (4° 33′ 07.19 W, 48° 21′ 32.13 N; Lelchat et al., 2019
). Infected C. marina was grown from cryogenized stocks in Marine Broth 2216 (DIFCO), from which Carin-1 was purified. A stock suspension of purified Carin-1 bacteriophages was stored at 4°C in autoclaved SM buffer (5.8 g l−1 NaCl, 2 g l−1 MgSO4, 50 ml 1 M Tris–HCl pH 7.5 in Milli-Q water) as described in Lelchat et al. (2019
).
2.2. Bacterial EPS production
Cryogenized stocks of C. marina were streaked onto Marine Agar (DIFCO) and incubated overnight at 25°C. A single colony was then pre-cultivated overnight at 25°C and 200 rev min−1 in liquid Marine Broth enriched with 30 g l−1 glucose to induce EPS production. Once the exponential phase was reached, the pre-culture was inoculated [1%(v/v)] in 500 ml glucose-enriched Marine Broth and incubated for 72 h (25°C, 150 rev min−1).
To purify the produced EPS, cultures were clarified at 7000g for 20 min (4°C). Supernatants were collected, filtered on 0.2 µm Stericup filtration units (PES membrane, GP Millipore) and concentrated to approximately 50 ml via tangential flow filtration using a 30 kDa cutoff Vivaflow 200 cassette (PES membrane, Sartorius). The concentrate was dialyzed against Milli-Q water (5 × 500 ml) in order to desalt the medium. Finally, the solution was frozen at −80°C and lyophilized.
2.3. Heterologous expression, production and purification of Dpo31
The wild-type Dpo31 (or, in brief, Dpo31) coding sequence (Supplementary Fig. S1) was cloned using a pFO4 plasmid [vector modified from pET-15b (Novagen, USA) to be compatible with the BamHI/EcoRI ligation strategy (Groisillier et al., 2010
)]. This plasmid generates a hexahistidine tag at the N-terminus of the recombinant protein and contains an ampicillin-resistance gene and a LacI gene, as well as the T7 promoter. Expression vectors (pFO4) were digested either by BamHI/EcoRI or XhoI/NsiI. For each targeted sequence, restriction sites recognized by BamHI, EcoRI or their isocaudomers (BglII and MfeI, respectively) were sought using the Geneious software (or XhoI and NsiI/SalI and PstI). The standard scheme for primer design was defined for the forward primers as 5′-[hexa-A tail]-[BamHI or BglII]-[start codon ATG if necessary]-[hybridization site]-3′ and for the reverse primers as 5′-[hexa-A tail]-[EcoRI or MfeI]-[stop anticodon]-[hybridization site]-3′. for PCR were purchased from Operon Biotechnologies GmbH, Cologne, Germany. PCR amplification was performed on a GeneAmpR PCR System 2700 (Applied Biosystems, USA). The thermocycle utilized was at 95°C for 5 min and 30 cycles of denaturing at 95°C for 30 s, annealing at 50°C for 30 s and polymerization at 72°C for 4 min. Escherichia coli strain DH5α was used for standard cloning procedures and E. coli strain BL21 (DE3) was used for gene-expression experiments. Both were grown in Luria–Bertani (LB) liquid medium or on LB solid medium, as described by Sambrook & Gething (1989
). For expression tests in 3 ml cultures, an auto-inducible ZYP5052 medium was used (Studier, 2005
). All media were supplemented, when necessary, with 100 µg ml−1 ampicillin (sodium salt).
The E. coli BL21 (DE3) clones expressing soluble Dpo31 were grown at 37°C overnight in LB medium containing 100 µg ml−1 ampicillin. The culture was then diluted 1:100 with auto-inducible ZYP5052 medium (Studier, 2005
; Groisillier et al., 2010
) containing 100 µg ml−1 ampicillin in a final volume of 500 ml and subjected to further incubation at 20°C for 72 h (baffled flasks, 300 rev min−1). Cells were recovered by centrifugation (35 min, 4°C, 3000g), resuspended in 20 ml buffer A (50 mM Tris–HCl pH 8.0, 500 mM NaCl, 20 mM imidazole) and chemically lysed as described previously (Groisillier et al., 2010
). Afterwards, the lysate was clarified at 12 000g for 30 min at 4°C and the supernatant was filtered at 0.22 µm. The supernatant was loaded onto an IMAC column charged with NiCl2 (0.1 M) and pre-equilibrated with buffer A. The column was washed with buffer A and the protein was eluted with a linear imidazole gradient produced by mixing buffer A and buffer B (50 mM Tris–HCl pH 8.0, 500 mM NaCl, 500 mM imidazole) at a flow rate of 1 ml min−1. Elution started with an imidazole concentration around 175 mM (35% buffer B) for Dpo31. The different fractions were analyzed by SDS–PAGE and fractions of interest were concentrated on Amicon Ultra-15 (10 kDa, Merck Millipore) to reach a volume of 2 ml. The protein was then injected onto a Sephacryl S-200 size-exclusion column (GE Healthcare) pre-equilibrated with buffer C (50 mM Tris–HCl pH 8.0, 300 mM NaCl). Absorbance was followed at 280 nm and fractions containing the enzyme were collected and pooled. A concentration step was added using an Amicon Ultra-15 until a volume of 1–2 ml was reached. This two-step purification allowed the final production of 47.3 mg of the recombinant Dpo31 protein starting from 500 ml culture. The molecular mass observed on SDS–PAGE was around 85–90 kDa for Dpo31, which is consistent with the theoretical size of the protein (86 795.47 Da; Fig. 4).
Cultures involving selenomethionine (SeMet) were performed similarly except that the auto-inducible ZYP5052 medium was replaced by PASM-5052 (Guerrero et al., 2001
). Despite the identical protocol, production and purification of the protein labeled with SeMet in 500 ml culture yielded 16.4 mg. The protein reacted differently on the IMAC column and eluted at an imidazole concentration of 80 mM (16% buffer B). The monodispersity of the protein samples was verified by DLS measurements (data not shown).
2.4. Heterologous expression, production and purification of Dpo31 domains Dpo31-ΔD1, D3* and D4
The domain boundaries of individual domains and constructs (Supplementary Fig. S1) were defined by the crystal structure of Dpo31. Constructs containing sequences corresponding to the designed variants were synthesized by GenScript. In brief, the open reading frames were amplified by PCR using primers that incorporated specific restriction sites compatible with our ligation strategies. The amplification products were cloned into the pET-15b vector, which encodes an N-terminal His6-tag. Recombinant plasmids were used to transform E. coli strain DH5α. The validated plasmids were then used to transform E. coli strain BL21(DE3). The transformed BL21(DE3) strains were grown overnight at 37°C in LB medium supplemented with ampicillin. After the initial small-scale production, only the individual domains D1, D2, D3*, D4 and Dpo31-ΔD1 indicated soluble expression (Supplementary Fig. S2) and were produced in larger cultures. The cultures were diluted 1:100 in 500 ml auto-inducible ZYP5052 medium (4 l to produce 3.2 mg of D3*) containing ampicillin and incubated at 20°C until saturation. After centrifugation at 5000g for 10 min at 4°C, the pelleted bacteria were stored at −20°C. The cells were resuspended in buffer consisting of 50 mM Tris–HCl pH 8.0, 100 mM NaCl, supplemented with 15 mM imidazole, a protease-inhibitor cocktail and DNase. The bacteria were disrupted using a French press, followed by centrifugation at 12 000g for 90 min at 4°C.
The supernatant was applied onto a HisTrap column (GE Healthcare) with Ni–NTA resin or TALON cobalt resin in the case of Dpo31 D3*. After washing, the bound proteins were eluted with a linear gradient of imidazole ranging from 15 mM to 1 M. The eluted proteins were collected and concentrated using Amicon Ultra centrifugal filters (Merck Millipore). The subdomains D1 and D2 rapidly aggregated and did not reach reasonable concentrations. The concentrated samples were subsequently purified on a Superdex 200 size-exclusion chromatography column (or Superdex 75 for Dpo31 D3*; GE Healthcare) using a buffer consisting of 50 mM Tris–HCl pH 8.0, 100 mM NaCl (Fig. 4). Finally, the proteins were concentrated using adapted Amicon Ultra-10 (Ultra 3 for D3* and D4) until a volume of about 1 ml was reached. The final concentrations for Dpo31-ΔD1, D3* and D4 were 26.9, 5.8 and 9.9 mg ml−1, respectively.
2.5. EPS analysis by size-exclusion chromatography (SEC-RI)
Prior to the analyses, samples were thawed, diluted at a ratio of 1:2 (EPS final concentration 1 mg ml−1) and filtered through a 0.45 µm PES filter (Sartorius). Analyses were performed using an UltiMate 3000 HPLC system. Volumes of 50 µl were injected onto two serial Superdex 10/300 columns (GE Healthcare) at 0.5 ml min−1. A buffer composed of 50 mM Tris–HCl, 0.5 M NaCl and 8 mM MgSO4 pH 7.5 was used as the solvent. Signal was acquired by refractometry during 120 min after injection (Supplementary Fig. S3).
2.6. EPS degradation assays
EPS degradation assays were performed to characterize the mode of action and physico-chemical stability of Dpo31. All assays were conducted in triplicate using purified bacterial EPS solutions [0.2%(w/v)] incubated with purified Dpo31 at a final concentration of 100 ng ml−1 in SM dilution buffer (50 mM Tris–HCl, 0.5 M NaCl, 8 mM MgSO4 pH 7.5). Incubation conditions and analytical procedures were adapted according to the parameters being assessed.
To determine whether Dpo31 exhibits lyase or hydrolase activity, EPS degradation was monitored at 25°C by measuring the absorbance at 235 nm, which indicates the formation of unsaturated bonds characteristic of lyase-mediated cleavage. The absorbance at 235 nm was recorded every 5 min for 1 h and after 5 h of incubation. No increase in absorbance was detected, indicating that Dpo31 activity was due to a hydrolytic reaction (Supplementary Fig. S7).
For stability assays, EPS solutions were incubated with Dpo31 for 1 h with agitation at 200 rev min−1 in a final volume of 200 µl. Reactions were terminated by heat inactivation at 90°C for 5 min, and samples were stored at −80°C until analysis. Temperature tolerance was assessed over a range of 5–60°C. pH dependence was evaluated at 25°C using 100 mM buffer systems, including Tris–maleate (pH 5.5–8.0), Tris–HCl (pH 7.5–9.0) and glycine–NaOH (pH 8.5–10.5). Salinity tolerance was tested at 25°C in SM buffer with NaCl concentrations ranging from 0 to 750 mM, with or without supplementation with 8 mM MgSO4·7H2O (Fig. 7). Control reactions containing EPS only were processed under identical conditions to assess potential auto-hydrolysis. Low-molecular-weight degradation products were recovered after filtration over a 100 kDa Vivaspin column and were analyzed by size-exclusion chromatography to visualize degradation patterns. Relative Dpo31 activity was calculated by normalizing all values to the highest activity observed within each series, which was set to 100%.
2.7. EPS depolymerase activity measured by DLS and MALS
To test for depolymerase activity of the different constructs, 10 mM Dpo31-ΔD1, D3* or D4 protein solution was incubated with 30 mg EPS solubilized in 100 ml buffer (50 mM Tris–HCl pH 8, 100 mM NaCl) for 24 h. Dynamic light-scattering (DLS) curves (Malvern Instruments) were recorded for separated EPS and protein solutions before incubation and after incubation (Supplementary Fig. S6). Only incubation with DPO31-ΔD1 led to a significative shift in EPS scattering indicative of degradation, meaning that D1, D3* and D4 are not sufficient and necessary for depolymerase activity. The catalytic activity is thus most likely located within the D3 domain.
The size range of the polymers and their hydrolysis products was assessed by high-performance size-exclusion coupled to a multi-angle light-scattering detector (HPSEC-MALS; Supplementary Fig. S4). The chromatographic system consisted of a Dionex Ultimate 3000 pump and autosampler coupled to a refractometer (Optilab rEX, Wyatt Technology) and a multi-angle light-scattering detector (Dawn Heleos, Wyatt Technology). Three columns connected in series were used for separation: Shodex SB-805, SB-804 and SB-803-HQ (8 × 300 mm each), with a separation domain extending between 103 and 4 × 106 g mol−1. A 0.1 M lithium nitrate solution containing 0.03% sodium azide, filtered through a 0.1 µm Durapore membrane (PES, Millipore), was used as the Elution was performed at 0.5 ml min−1 and at room temperature (21 ± 2°C). The data were recorded and analyzed using the Astra 5 software (Wyatt Technology).
2.8. Crystallization and structure resolution of Dpo31
Crystallization experiments for the His-tagged Dpo31 (828 residues) from phage Carin-1 were set up in a first step by screening 3 × 96 conditions using the JCSG+, PEGs Suite and PACT (Qiagen) commercial kits with a nano-drop dispensing robot (Gryphon). The screening solutions were dispensed into Greiner 96-well trays (80 µl) with sitting drops composed of 0.2 µl protein solution and 0.1 µl well solution. The best hit was further optimized by the hanging-drop vapor-diffusion method at room temperature by mixing 2 µl protein solution (12 mg ml−1) with 1 µl reservoir solution consisting of 1.2 M ammonium sulfate, 100 mM citric acid pH 5.0. Crystals of SeMet-labeled Dpo31 were obtained by the same method, mixing 2 µl protein solution (14.7 mg ml−1) with 1 µl reservoir solution consisting of 1.6 M ammonium sulfate, 100 mM citric acid pH 4.6 or 4.7. All crystals were flash-cooled in liquid nitrogen in reservoir solution containing between 15 and 25%(v/v) glycerol.
X-ray diffraction data were collected on the PROXIMA-1 beamline at the SOLEIL synchrotron, St Aubin, France. Data processing was performed using the XDS package (Kabsch, 2010
). Since the diffraction data for Dpo31 were highly anisotropic, elliptical cutoffs were applied using the STARANISO program (Tickle et al., 2016
) to final resolutions of 2.2, 2.9 and 2.15 Å for Dpo31, SeMet Dpo31 and Dpo31-ΔD1, respectively (Table 1
). Experimental phases were initially obtained from a selenium-derivatized (SeMet) crystal. A single-wavelength anomalous diffraction (SAD) data set was collected at the Se edge (λ = 0.979 Å). The selenium sites were identified using HKL2MAP (Pape & Schneider, 2004
) and experimental phases were calculated with Phaser (McCoy et al., 2007
) and refined by density modification using Parrot (Cowtan, 2010
).
‡Diffraction data were collected from two crystals, which diffracted anisotropically to 3.24 Å along 0.894a* − 0.447b*, 3.25 Å along b* and 2.09 Å along c*. §Diffraction data were collected from one crystal, which diffracted anisotropically to 2.05 Å along 0.711a* − 0.703c*, 2.81 Å along b* and 2.49 Å along 0.42a* + 0.91c*. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The initial maps were not readily interpretable, but the presence of a left-handed parallel β-helix domain was clearly distinguishable. A search model (a 130-amino-acid fragment of PDB entry 3suc) identified using HHpred (Zimmermann et al., 2018
) could be positioned in the electron density using phased rotation and translation functions as implemented in MOLREP (Vagin & Teplyakov, 2010
). Subsequently, several rounds of phase improvements were conducted by combining experimental and model phases, again using Phaser (McCoy et al., 2007
), followed by density modification with Parrot (Cowtan, 2010
). The resulting model underwent iterative cycles of manual reconstruction in Coot (Emsley et al., 2010
) and refinement in BUSTER (Bricogne et al., 2022
). Phase extension was subsequently carried out using the final model for molecular replacement against a higher resolution native dataset. The final models were evaluated using MolProbity (Chen et al., 2010
).
2.9. Crystallization and structure determination of Dpo31 constructs
The protein constructs Dpo31-ΔD1 (26.9 mg ml−1), D3* (5.8 mg ml−1) and D4 (9.9 mg ml−1) were similarly screened against 3 × 96 conditions using the JCSG+, PEG Suite and PACT commercial kits. However, none of the trials for D3* led to exploitable conditions, even after additional screening with the SaltRX and PEGs II kits. The best crystals of Dpo31-ΔD1 (residues 103–828) were obtained by mixing 2 µl protein solution (26.9 mg ml−1) with 1 µl reservoir solution consisting of 20% PEG 3350, 200 mM potassium nitrate. The best crystals of D4 (residues 664–828) were obtained by mixing 2 µl protein solution (9.86 mg ml−1) with 1 µl reservoir solution consisting of 27%(w/v) PEG 3350, 21%(v/v) 2-propanol, 100 mM Tris–HCl pH 8.5. Crystals of Dpo31-ΔD1 and D4 were flash-cooled in liquid nitrogen in reservoir solution containing 10 and 12%(v/v) glycerol, respectively.
X-ray diffraction data were collected on the PROXIMA-2 beamline at the SOLEIL synchrotron, St Aubin, France. Data processing was performed using the XDS package (Kabsch, 2010
). The structure of Dpo31-ΔD1 was phased by molecular replacement with MOLREP (Vagin & Teplyakov, 2010
) using the native Dpo31 structure after deleting the D1 domain, and was reconstituted as a trimer by applying the `Generate symmetry mates' option in Coot (Emsley et al., 2010
). Iterative cycles of structure refinement under strong NCS restraints and manual reconstruction were carried out with BUSTER (Bricogne et al., 2022
) and Coot (Emsley et al., 2010
), respectively. The structure of D4 was phased by molecular replacement using MOLREP (Vagin & Teplyakov, 2010
) and the coordinates of the D4 domain of Dpo31, and was refined with BUSTER (Bricogne et al., 2022
). Final refinement statistics for both crystal structures are given in Table 1
.
2.10. Small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) analyses
SAXS measurements were conducted on the SWING beamline at the SOLEIL synchrotron, St Aubin, France and were performed at 15°C. The SAXS data were measured using the same buffer as for crystallization trials (50 mM Tris–HCl pH 8, 100 mM NaCl). The scattering vector is defined as q = 4πsinθ/λ, where 2θ is the scattering angle. Data were collected covering a q range of 0.005–0.5 Å−1. Data were recorded using an AVIEX170170 CCD detector at a distance of 1.807 m (λ = 1.033 Å). Protein solutions of Dpo31, Dpo31-ΔD1, D3* and D4 were prepared at the final concentrations given in Table 2
. SAXS data were collected on samples eluting from an online size-exclusion high-performance liquid chromatography (SEHPLCBio-SEC3Agilent) column directly connected to the SAXS measuring cell. Volumes of protein sample ranging from 60 to 120 µl were injected and eluted directly into the SAXS capillary at a flow rate of 0.2 ml min−1. The elution buffer consisted of 50 mM Tris–HCl pH 8.0, 100 mM NaCl, identical to those used for the purification step. 250 SAXS frames were collected continuously during elution with a frame duration of 1.5 s and a between frames of 0.5 s. 100 frames accounting for buffer scattering were collected before the void volume. SAXS data were normalized to the intensity of the incident beam, and background (i.e. the elution buffer) was subtracted using the program FoxTrot (David & Pérez, 2009
). The experimental curves were analyzed using PRIMUS as part of the ATSAS suite (Franke et al., 2017
) to calculate the Rg value in the Guinier region, and GNOM (Svergun, 1992
) was used to calculate the P(r) and Dmax values. The experimental curve was compared with the theoretical diffusion curves for the and the cryo-EM structure using CRYSOL (Franke et al., 2017
) as implemented in the ATSAS suite. GASBOR (Svergun et al., 2001
) or DAMMIF (Franke & Svergun, 2009
) were used in subsequent steps for data interpretation and ab initio modeling to find the best shapes that fit the experimental data.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3. Results
3.1. Crystal structure determination of the viral enzyme Dpo31
After having identified the polysaccharide depolymerase of Carin-1 within the phage genome (Mocaër, 2019
), the targeted gene sequence was cloned and heterologously expressed in E. coli. EPS-degradation assays were successful with the recombinant protein, confirming that the heterologous protein was produced in an active form. Larger quantities (almost 50 mg) were then produced and purified to homogeneity in order to structurally and biochemically characterize the enzyme. Since the sequence homology to any characterized protein was very low (below 10%), and at the time of the experiments AlphaFold did not yet exist, SeMet-labeled Dpo31 was also successfully produced and purified. Both the native and SeMet-labeled proteins were successfully and reproducibly crystallized, and the crystals belonged to H32 with unit-cell parameters a = 88.2, c = 643.34 Å and one Dpo31 or SeMet-labeled molecule in the (Table 1
). The trimeric structural organization of Dpo31 was formed by three intertwined protein chains centered on the crystallographic threefold axis (Fig. 1
).
| Figure 1 Ribbon representation of the trimeric organization in the crystal structures of (a) native Dpo31, (b) Dpo31 and the docked most probable position of the trimeric D4, which although present in the construction was not visible in the electronic density of the crystal structure, and (c) of Dpo31-ΔD1. The three individual protein chains are colored green, cyan and magenta, respectively. The docked ribbon representation of the D4 trimer, as defined in the crystal structure, is colored yellow. The N-terminal end of the protein is located at the bottom and the C-terminus is positioned at the top of the representations in (a), (b) and (c). The protein attaches to the phage tail through the N-terminal D1 domain. |
When submitting the sequence to AlphaFold3 without knowing the oligomeric state, the overall secondary structures of the different subdomains are well predicted, but the relative positions of these are incorrect; the structure is curved, forming almost a U shape (Fig. 2
a), and far from the bent form observed by SAXS or cryo-EM. In contrast, when submitting the sequence and asking for a trimer, AlphaFold3 predicts a straight form, similar to that observed in the crystal structure, but the root-mean-square deviation (r.m.s.d.) between the predicted and the experimental structure is 4.02 Å for 395 Cα atoms out of 652, which hampers solution of the structure by using this structure as a model. Indeed, while D3 is well superimposed, the AlphaFold3 model is twisted in domains D2 and D1 (Fig. 2
b) with respect to the crystal structure, and the change in arrangement would have been difficult to detect when preparing a suitable model for molecular replacement.
| Figure 2 Ribbon representation of AlphaFold-predicted models of Dpo31. The different domains from D1 to D4 are labeled. (a) Prediction of full-length Dpo31 when submitting the sequence as a monomer, without specifying the oligomeric state, resulting in a curved overall shape. (b) Superimposition of the AlphaFold-predicted model (yellow), when specifying the oligomeric state as a trimer, onto the crystal structure of Dpo31 (the three monomers are colored magenta, cyan and green, respectively). D4 is absent in the crystal structure and D3 of both models fits well, but the presence of a clear twist or rotation, starting from D2 and increasing towards D1, results in a large discrepancy between these domains in the predicted and experimental structures. |
The 3D of Dpo31 was solved using the SAD method at the wavelength of the Se (λ = 0.979 Å) on a SeMet-labeled crystal at low resolution (for details, see Section 2
). This preliminary model was subsequently refined against very anisotropic native data obtained from a Dpo31 crystal that diffracted to a final resolution of 2.2 Å (Table 1
). The overall trimeric protein structure displayed an elongated shape 240.4 Å in length and roughly 80 Å in diameter. The crystal structure also revealed an organization into several domains, which were named D1–D4 (Fig. 3
and Supplementary Fig. S1) in analogy to other tail-spike proteins (Xiang et al., 2009
).
| Figure 3 Schematic representation of the domain structure of Dpo31. Colored boxes in the linear diagram denote individual domains: D1 (purple), D2 (yellow), D3 (orange), D3* (cyan) and D4 (green). Above the diagram, representative surface renderings of the assembled particle are shown with the corresponding domain densities colored as in the schematic. In all cases, the mature form does not include domain D4. |
The final could be traced from residues 8 to 669, covering D1–D3 (including D3*), while no density was identified for D4. Moreover, the crystal packing is such that there is no space for D4, and we assume that only the mature form of Dpo31, without D4, is present in the crystals. This is supported by the systematic presence of a band at 18 kDa, corresponding to the molecular weight of D4, in the SDS–PAGE of several Dpo31 constructs (Supplementary Fig. S2).
The N-terminal domain D1 has a classical β-sandwich fold composed of residues 8–87 and is connected, through about 23 residues with no defined secondary structure, to the first helix of a coiled-coil region of domain D2. Domain D2 is composed of two three-helix-coil regions separated by a loop junction, and is overall composed of residues 102–256. The largest domain, D3 (including D3*), comprises residues 257–663 and is composed of a trimeric left-handed parallel β-helix that forms a ladder of 17 parallel β-strands. These β-helices are tightly packed against the equivalent β-helices of the two other monomers, together forming the core of the structure, which is typical of viral tail-spike proteins (d'Acapito et al., 2023
; Smith et al., 2005
; Figs. 1
a and 1
b). An additional domain that we labeled D3* protrudes from the central core structure, inserted from residues 434 to 536, and displays an immunoglobulin (Ig-like) fold.
When discovering the complex domain organization of this large tail-spike protein, we decided to produce truncated forms and individual domains, with the aim of better localizing the catalytic activity but also to understand the importance of subdomains for the overall structural organization. Not knowing whether some of the domains work together or whether individual domains could fold correctly when isolated, we tested each domain alone, as well as omitting each domain, and several combinations two by two (Supplementary Fig. S1). While 11 different constructs were cloned (see the scheme in Supplementary Fig. S1), only Dpo31-ΔD1 and the individual domains D1, D2, D3* and D4 were expressed solubly (Fig. 4
and Supplementary Fig. S2). Dpo31-ΔD1, D3* and D4 were purified in sufficient quality and quantity to set up crystallization trials and undertake SAXS measurements. The constructs D1 and D2 aggregated rapidly and appeared not to be suitable for further biochemical characterization.
| Figure 4 SDS–PAGE analysis of purified Dpo31 constructs. A single band is observed for each construct: full-length Dpo31 (88.7 kDa), Dpo31-ΔD1 (77.7 kDa) and Dpo31-D3* (10.5 kDa), except for Dpo31-D4, for which two bands, corresponding to the tagged (19.5 kDa) and cleaved (17.5 kDa) forms, are visible. |
3.2. Crystal structure determination of the truncated constructs Dpo31-ΔD1 and D4
We designed and expressed a series of constructs covering the four domains of the tail spike (D1–D4) to evaluate their contributions to folding and solubility. The intact construct covering domains D1–D4 and the fragment D2–D3–D4 (Dpo31-ΔD1) were soluble and purified readily (yields of ∼50.0 mg and 34.1 mg per 500 ml culture, respectively; Fig. 4
), whereas most fragments lacking D4 (D1–D2–D3, D2–D3, D3, D1–D2) were insoluble (Supplementary Fig. S2). The isolated D4 domain is intrinsically soluble but is expressed at low yield (∼5.9 mg in 500 ml culture). D2 alone shows incomplete solubility and a tendency to aggregate, and D1 is poorly soluble. These results are consistent with a structural model in which D2 forms the trimeric core required for assembly and D4 functions as an auto-chaperone: D4 facilitates final folding only in the context of a properly formed D2 scaffold (for example D3–D4 is insoluble, while D2–D3–D4 is soluble). The observations also suggest that domain boundaries and/or context-dependent cleavage of D4 can influence fragment solubility. Because solubility and proper assembly depended critically on the D2 trimeric scaffold and the presence of D4, we focused crystallographic efforts on truncated variants that retain the architecture. Crystals were successfully obtained for Dpo31-ΔD1 and D4, while D3* did not crystallize within roughly 500 crystallization trials. The crystals of Dpo31-ΔD1 belonged to space group P21, with unit-cell parameters a = 93.7, b = 75.6, c = 124.9 Å, β = 103.3° and three molecules in the (Table 1
), corresponding to the trimeric structure of the protein (Fig. 1
c). Domain D2 was more disordered in this truncated construct; nevertheless, the monomeric chains could be traced from residues 112, 103 and 109 for the three monomeric chains, respectively. All three chains ended at residue 663, which is slightly shorter than for the native Dpo31 protein. Chain-by-chain superimposition between the native monomer and each of the Dpo31-ΔD1 monomers leads to root-mean-square deviations (r.m.s.d.s) of 1.94 Å (A–A), 1.04 Å (A–B) and 1.94 Å (A–C), respectively. Overall, no major conformational changes are observed, but the helices of domain D2 display much higher B factors, more than twice as high in the truncated protein with respect to the native Dpo31 protein.
The crystals of D4 belonged to P3221, with unit-cell parameters a = b = 69.7, c = 533.4 Å, and contained three independent copies (unrelated by any rotational symmetry) of the trimeric organization of the monomeric D4 domains, leading to a total of nine molecules of D4 in the The three, biologically relevant, D4 trimers superimpose well (the r.m.s.d.s of superimpositions between trimers range between 1.27 and 1.38 Å) and their presence confirms that this domain is able to form the trimeric organization in the absence of the rest of the protein (Figs. 5
a and 5
b). All residues from Asp664 to Lys828 could be traced in the electron density, although several regions were disordered. A DALI search revealed that D4 matches best (Z-score 21, r.m.s.d. of 1.7 Å) with an equivalent domain of the tail-spike (TS) protein gp12 from the bacteriophage φ29-infecting Bacillus subtilis (Xiang et al., 2009
) with the same trimeric organization, although neither D2 or D3 of the respective TS proteins have the same level of similarity.
| Figure 5 Ribbon representation of the structural organization of D4 as observed in the crystal structure of the isolated domain. (a) Side view and (b) top view of the trimeric organization of D4. (c) Ribbon representation of the bent structure of Dpo31 that was fitted into the cryo-EM electron density (d'Acapito et al., 2023 |
3.3. Small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) analyses of Dpo31 and truncated constructs
To obtain further insight into the structural domain arrangement of Dpo31 in solution, we have successfully collected small-angle X-ray scattering data for native Dpo31 and the purified and stable constructs Dpo31-ΔD1, D3* and D4 (Fig. 6
and Table 2
). As expected, the scattering data for Dpo31 (Fig. 6
a), Dpo31-ΔD1 (Fig. 6
b) and D4 (Fig. 6
c) show that the trimeric organization is maintained in solution while, not surprisingly, D3* appears as a monomer (Fig. 6
d).
| Figure 6 Small-angle X-ray scattering curves of Dpo31 (a), Dpo31-ΔD1 (b), D4 (c) and D3* (d). In all panels, experimental data are represented as black dots and the calculated fit by GASBOR (a) or DAMMIF (b, c, d) is colored red (native Dpo31), yellow (Dpo31-ΔD1), green (D4) and cyan (D3*), respectively. The residual of each fit is given as ΔI(q)/σI(q) below each corresponding curve (same colors). In each panel, the insets show ribbon representations of structural coordinates (left or upper inset) and the most representative envelopes that fit the experimental data (right or lower inset); the colors are the same as described above. |
In the case of native Dpo31 and Dpo31-ΔD1, the scattering curves are best fitted by clusters of envelopes [calculated with DAMMIF (Franke & Svergun, 2009
) or GASBOR (Svergun et al., 2001
)], which in general points towards the presence of conformational variability and/or flexibility. In both cases, the theoretical scattering curves calculated from the crystal structure coordinates using CRYSOL (as implemented in the ATSAS suite; Franke et al., 2017
) only give very poor fits, which also supports the presence of conformational variability. Most interestingly, the most representative envelopes calculated for Dpo31-ΔD1 maintain the straight, elongated arrangement, while native Dpo31 envelopes are more compatible with the bent form that was previously observed in the cryo-EM data (d'Acapito et al., 2023
). In contrast, the theoretical scattering of the AlphaFold (Jumper et al., 2021
) and crystal structures of the D3* domain and D4 trimer, respectively, fit the experimental curve with reasonable χ2 values (CRYSOL fit in Table 2
).
3.4. Analyses of EPS degradation by recombinant Dpo31 with SEC-RI
EPS from C. marina, native and degraded, were analyzed using size-exclusion chromatography coupled with a refractometer. Data recorded with native EPS showed two distinct populations: (i) a first population with an elution time peak at 30 min with a consequent front shoulder between 26 and 28 min, and with two slight following shoulders between 32 and 35 min and between 35 and 40 min, and (ii) a large peak between 44 and 63 min with a peak at 54 min of elution (Supplementary Fig. S3a).
After degradation by the Dpo31 enzyme, modifications appeared in both populations. These effects were observed in a noncomplete degradation state (Supplementary Fig. S3b) and in a final degradation step (Supplementary Fig. S3c). In the first case, the highest peak of the first population at 30 min faded, but the front and the shoulder remained. The shoulder at 35–40 min increased and a peak appeared at 37 min of elution. Concerning the second population, the large peak remained, but three populations appeared at 57, 59 and 62–63 min. In the case of the final degradation, the same observations were made as for the first population. However, a unique peak appeared after the large second population at an elution time of 62–63 min. The area of this latter peak was considered to be final degradation products and was taken into account for further analysis regarding the enzyme activity at different pH, temperature and salinity conditions. Similarly, degradation, although not to completion, was observed when following the reaction by HPSEC-MALS (Supplementary Fig. S4) since an additional peak with a lower molecular weight appeared after incubation with Dpo31 (Supplementary Table S1). Altogether, these results confirm that recombinant Dpo31 is able to degrade EPS produced by C. marina.
3.5. Dpo31 activity under variable temperature, pH and salt conditions
The activity of Dpo31 increased with increasing temperature from 4 to 45°C, reaching its optimal activity at 45°C (Fig. 7
a). At this optimal temperature, Dpo31 activity was four times higher than at 13°C, which is the average seawater temperature at the Carin-1 isolation site. Above 45°C enzyme activity declined rapidly, and no activity was recorded at 60°C. This correlates well with the protein melting temperature (Tm) determined by dynamic light scattering (DLS), for which we obtained a Tm of 43.72 ± 0.15°C (Supplementary Fig. S5). Regarding pH conditions, Dpo31 was functional between pH 5.5 and 10, with optimal activity at pH 8.5 in a glycine–NaOH buffer. The buffering molecule influenced the enzymatic activity, with glycine–NaOH yielding twice the activity of Tris–HCl at pH 8.5 (Fig. 7
b). The addition of salt reduced Dpo31 activity, with the maximal activity recorded in the absence of NaCl, and a continuous decrease was observed up to a concentration of 350 mM. No activity was detected at NaCl concentrations above 600 mM. The addition of MgSO4 enhanced the activity, although the same declining pattern with increasing NaCl concentration was observed (Fig. 7
c).
| Figure 7 Degradation efficiencies of Dpo31 under varying conditions (a) temperature, (b) pH and (c) salt concentration. Relative Dpo31 activity was calculated by normalizing each series to its highest observed activity, set as 100%. For the pH series, values were specifically normalized to activity at Tris–HCl pH 7.5. |
3.6. Activity of truncated constructs as measured by dynamic light scattering
To more precisely identify the location of the enzymatic activity, EPS degradation in the presence of the various soluble and stable constructs, Dpo31-ΔD1, D3* and D4, was monitored by dynamic light scattering (DLS; Supplementary Fig. S6a). The size distribution of the substrate after 24 h of incubation diminished only in the presence of Dpo31-ΔD1 (Supplementary Fig. S6b) and not in the presence of D3* (Supplementary Fig. S6c) or D4 (data not shown), indicating that similar to analogous tail-spike proteins, the catalytic activity is carried by the central domain D3. While D3* alone clearly is not responsible for activity, we could not explore whether the presence of D3* is required for activity, since constructs of D3 alone were not stable in our hands.
4. Discussion
The present study, focusing on the structural and biochemical characterization of Dpo31 from the marine bacteriophage Carin-1, reveals that this protein displays a typical, although divergent, tail-spike protein fold, as illustrated in Fig. 8
. Intriguingly, the crystallographic space group of Dpo31, which is H32, and the protein arrangement in the crystals is commonly found for tail-spike proteins (Xiang et al., 2009
; Smith et al., 2005
). Most interestingly, the distant structural similarity was not detected at the primary-sequence level, with less than 10% sequence identity of Dpo31 to any characterized protein. This genetic divergence highlights the fact that comparative genomics does not appear to be a suitable tool to assess diversity and evolutionary relationships of these viral proteins, and provides a likely explanation why these depolymerases and/or tail-spike proteins are rarely detected in marine bacteriophage genomes.
| | Figure 8 Ribbon representation comparing various tail-spike protein monomers for which crystal structures have been determined. Secondary structures are colored magenta for β-sheets, cyan for α-helices and pink for loops. The comparison highlights the large diversity of structural features leading to low sequence identities of less than 10% between proteins. The leftmost panel shows Dpo31 (our study; PDB entry 28lx) compared with CBA120-TSP3 (PDB entry 6nw9), DnGVE2 (PDB entry 7chu), P22 (PDB entry 2xc1), φ29 (PDB entry 3gq8), HK620 (PDB entry 2vji) and Sf6 (PDB entry 2vbk). |
Despite a similar overall structural organization of Dpo31 compared with tail-spike proteins from various bacteriophages (Fig. 8
), such as ΔnGVE2 (Zhang et al., 2020
) or P22 (Seul et al., 2014
), it does display several distinct features providing structural novelty. In particular, while the β-helix domains D3 of ΔnGVE2 (PDB entry 7chu) and P22 (PDB entry 2xc1) have 10 and 13 helical turns, respectively, domain D3 in Dpo31 is particularly long, having 17 β-helix turns. While protruding loops or domains in the β-helix domain (D3 in our structure) have been reported, the D3* domain of Dpo31 displays an immunoglobulin-like structural arrangement that so far has not been observed in short-tail podovirus tail-spike proteins. A DALI search with the isolated D3* domain reveals distant similarity to sugar-binding domains (SBDs) with an Ig-like fold, such as those present in a galactan synthase (PDB entry 8d3z; Z-score 2.9, r.m.s.d. of 3.38 Å for D3* and SBD) and a GH2 (PDB entry 8u01; Z-score 2.8, r.m.s.d. of 3.89 Å for D3* and SBD). Based on these similarities in combination with our activity assays, showing that all constructs containing domain D3 degrade the EPS from C. maritima, we speculate that the depolymerase activity is located in the D3 domain and probably at or close to the interface with the D3* domain. Due to the low sequence similarities with other depolymerases, it is impossible at this stage to identify any residues that could play a role in the (hydro)lytic activity.
In the recent cryo-EM study of the entire Carin-1 virion by d'Acapito et al. (2023
) it was possible to identify and position this tail-spike protein in the experimental map, allowing its relative orientation to be defined, with D1 linked to the base of the virion and D3 oriented outwards, ready to anchor to the host's surface (Figs. 6a and 6c in d'Acapito et al., 2023
). Importantly, the arrangement that fitted best the cryo-EM map is bent, with three hinges located between D1 and D2, within D2 and between D2 and D3 [see Figs. 6b and 6c of d'Acapito et al. (2023
) and Fig. 5
c], while the overall arrangement of the Dpo31 domains in the crystal structure is perfectly aligned and straight. In contrast, our SAXS experiments showed that the arrangement observed in solution (Fig. 6
a) is in better agreement with the bent form observed in the cryo-EM map, indicating that the straight conformation is most likely forced by crystal-packing interactions.
In the study of protein gp12 from bacteriophage φ29 by Xiang et al. (2009
) the authors show that the C-terminal D4 domain is an `auto-chaperone' aiding with the trimeric formation of the rest of the TS protein. In our study, the corresponding domain D4 was systematically absent in the expressed proteins, even if present in the cloned construction (Supplementary Figs. S1 and S2). In addition, the presence of an intense band at the size of D4 in the SDS–PAGE gels (Supplementary Fig. S2) indicates that the domain was prone to proteolytic cleavage. Together with the structural similarity that we observe, and the well conserved organization of the trimeric D4 in our study, these findings allow us to suggest that D4 plays a similar role in Dpo31. Furthermore, by comparing the ATP-binding site residues reported by Xiang et al. (2009
) (PDB entries 3suc and 3gqk), we found that most of the key amino acids are conserved in our structure, suggesting that the overall architecture of the ATP-binding pocket is also preserved, despite the absence of ATP in our crystal structure.
Our study provides the first experimental evidence that this tail-spike protein, Dpo31, acts as a depolymerase active on the EPS secreted by C. marina. Moreover, we were able to locate the lytic activity in the D3 domain. Interestingly, the lytic activity does not degrade the EPS completely, in the sense that no small oligosaccharides are released as reaction products, but in contrast the depolymerase produces polysaccharide fractions with medium to high molecular weight (roughly around 225 kDa) after incubation with C. marina EPS. We conclude that Dpo31 seems to be very specific for a rarely occurring bond or sugar unit, which could explain the occurrence of this degradation pattern and our difficulties in characterizing the reaction products further. This highly specific cleavage of a rarely occurring bond or sugar could also explain the specificity of the depolymerase for C. marina EPS. Such specificity may underlie the strict host range of Carin-1 for C. marina.
From an ecological perspective, the depolymerization activity of Dpo31 suggests that phages may influence EPS turnover in natural marine environments in a highly selective manner. Marine bacteria are indeed known to release copious amounts of EPS into seawater, where they constitute a major component of dissolved organic matter (DOM; Decho & Gutierrez, 2017
; Stoderegger & Herndl, 1998
). Experiments with natural bacterial communities supplemented with EPS indicate that these macromolecules are largely resistant to microbial degradation (Stoderegger & Herndl, 1998
, 1999
; Zhang et al., 2020
), suggesting that EPS contribute to semi-labile and refractory DOM pools and long-term carbon storage. Our results demonstrate that marine phages can transform EPS through tail-bound Dpos, with efficiencies that depend on environmental parameters such as pH, temperature and salinity. Nevertheless, the physiological relevance of the observed salt sensitivity remains to be further investigated. This reveals a previously unrecognized viral mechanism capable of altering the EPS size spectrum, with potential consequences for EPS bioavailability. Considering the ubiquity of phages (Stoderegger & Herndl, 1999
) and the widespread distribution of bacterial EPS (Decho & Gutierrez, 2017
) in the ocean, viral Dpos may contribute to the structuring of microbial communities and the modulation of carbon fluxes, and therefore warrant further investigation.
Supporting information
PDB references: Dpo31, native, 28lx; ΔD1, 28mg; D4, 28nb
SASBDB references: Dpo31, ΔD1, SASDYX6; D4, SASDYY6; native, SASDYZ6
Supplementary Figures and Table,. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1107/S2059798326005425/ni5032sup1.pdf
Footnotes
‡S. Sirigu, T. Roret and P.-Y. Mocaër contributed equally to this work.
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank the Biogenouest Crystallography Platform CristalO at the Station Biologique de Roscoff and the SOLEIL synchrotron staff on the PROXIMA-1, PROXIMA-2 and SWING beamlines for their important technical support. We also thank Murielle Jam, LBI2M CNRS-SU UMR8227, for technical assistance when performing the experiments to detect hydrolytic activity. We warmly thank Dr Gurvan Michel, LBI2M CNRS-SU UMR8227, for constructive discussions and help with functional annotation of genes potentially active on Open access publication funding provided by COUPERIN CY26.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Data availability
The genome sequence of phage Carin-1 has been deposited in GenBank under accession No. PQ119497.1. The coordinates of the crystal structures have been deposited in the Protein Data Bank with accession codes 28lx, 28mg and 28nb. The small-angle X-ray scattering data have been deposited in SASBDB with accession Nos. SASDYX6 (Dpo31-ΔD1), SASDYY6 (D4) and SASDYZ6 (Dpo31-wt).
Funding information
This work was funded by the French National Research Agency (ANR) under the Calypso project (ANR-15-CE01-0009).
References
Bramhachari, P. V. & Dubey, S. K. (2006). Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 43, 571–577. CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Bricogne, G., Blanc, E., Brandl, M., Flensburg, C., Keller, P., Paciorek, P. & Roversi, P. (2022). BUSTER version 2.10.4. Cambridge: Global Phasing Ltd. Google Scholar
Chen, V. B., Arendall, W. B., Headd, J. J., Keedy, D. A., Immormino, R. M., Kapral, G. J., Murray, L. W., Richardson, J. S. & Richardson, D. C. (2010). Acta Cryst. D66, 12–21. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Chi, Z. & Fang, Y. (2005). J. Ocean Univ. China, 4, 67–74. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Cornelissen, A., Ceyssens, P.-J., Krylov, V. N., Noben, J.-P., Volckaert, G. & Lavigne, R. (2012). Virology, 434, 251–256. CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Cornelissen, A., Ceyssens, P.-J., T'Syen, J., Van Praet, H., Noben, J.-P., Shaburova, O. V., Krylov, V. N., Volckaert, G. & Lavigne, R. (2011). PLoS One, 6, e18597. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Cowtan, K. (2010). Acta Cryst. D66, 470–478. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
d'Acapito, A., Roret, T., Zarkadas, E., Mocaër, P.-Y., Lelchat, F., Baudoux, A.-C., Schoehn, G. & Neumann, E. (2023). J. Virol. 97, e00248-23. PubMed Google Scholar
David, G. & Pérez, J. (2009). J. Appl. Cryst. 42, 892–900. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Decho, A. W. & Gutierrez, T. (2017). Front. Microbiol. 8, 922. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Delbarre-Ladrat, C., Sinquin, C., Lebellenger, L., Zykwinska, A. & Colliec-Jouault, S. (2014). Front. Chem. 2, 85. PubMed Google Scholar
Drouillard, S., Jeacomine, I., Buon, L., Boisset, C., Courtois, A., Thollas, B., Morvan, P.-Y., Vallée, R. & Helbert, W. (2018). Mar. Drugs, 16, 164. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Emsley, P., Lohkamp, B., Scott, W. G. & Cowtan, K. (2010). Acta Cryst. D66, 486–501. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Franke, D., Petoukhov, M. V., Konarev, P. V., Panjkovich, A., Tuukkanen, A., Mertens, H. D. T., Kikhney, A. G., Hajizadeh, N. R., Franklin, J. M., Jeffries, C. M. & Svergun, D. I. (2017). J. Appl. Cryst. 50, 1212–1225. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Franke, D. & Svergun, D. I. (2009). J. Appl. Cryst. 42, 342–346. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Groisillier, A., Hervé, C., Jeudy, A., Rebuffet, E., Pluchon, P. F., Chevolot, Y., Flament, D., Geslin, C., Morgado, I. M., Power, D., Branno, M., Moreau, H., Michel, G., Boyen, C. & Czjzek, M. (2010). Microb. Cell Fact. 9, 45. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Guerrero, S. A., Hecht, H.-J., Hofmann, B., Biebl, H. & Singh, M. (2001). Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 56, 718–723. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Hassler, C. S., Alasonati, E., Mancuso Nichols, C. A. & Slaveykova, V. I. (2011). Mar. Chem. 123, 88–98. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Jia, X., Gao, X., Zhang, S., Inman, J. T., Hong, Y., Singh, A., Rashid, F., Berger, J. M., Patel, S. S. & Wang, M. D. (2025). Nat. Commun. 16, 10543. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., Bridgland, A., Meyer, C., Kohl, S. A. A., Ballard, A. J., Cowie, A., Romera-Paredes, B., Nikolov, S., Jain, R., Adler, J., Back, T., Petersen, S., Reiman, D., Clancy, E., Zielinski, M., Steinegger, M., Pacholska, M., Berghammer, T., Bodenstein, S., Silver, D., Vinyals, O., Senior, A. W., Kavukcuoglu, K., Kohli, P. & Hassabis, D. (2021). Nature, 596, 583–589. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Kabsch, W. (2010). Acta Cryst. D66, 125–132. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Knecht, L. E., Veljkovic, M. & Fieseler, L. (2020). Front. Microbiol. 10, 2949. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Kokoulin, M. S., Kalinovsky, A. I., Komandrova, N. A., Tomshich, S. V., Romanenko, L. A. & Vaskovsky, V. E. (2014). Carbohydr. Res. 397, 46–51. CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Labrie, S. J., Samson, J. E. & Moineau, S. (2010). Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 8, 317–327. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Latka, A., Maciejewska, B., Majkowska-Skrobek, G., Briers, Y. & Drulis-Kawa, Z. (2017). Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 101, 3103–3119. CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Leiman, P. G. & Molineux, I. J. (2008). Mol. Microbiol. 69, 287–290. CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Lelchat, F., Mocaer, P. Y., Ojima, T., Michel, G., Sarthou, G., Bucciarelli, E., Cérantola, S., Colliec-Jouault, S., Boisset, C. & Baudoux, A.-C. (2019). FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 95, fiz079. Google Scholar
McCoy, A. J., Grosse-Kunstleve, R. W., Adams, P. D., Winn, M. D., Storoni, L. C. & Read, R. J. (2007). J. Appl. Cryst. 40, 658–674. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Mocaër, P.-Y. (2019). Thesis. https://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-03137918. Google Scholar
Nichols, C. M., Lardière, S. G., Bowman, J. P., Nichols, P. D. A. E., Gibson, J. & Guézennec, J. (2005). Microb. Ecol. 49, 578–589. CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Pape, T. & Schneider, T. R. (2004). J. Appl. Cryst. 37, 843–844. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Sambrook, J. & Gething, M.-J. (1989). Nature, 342, 224–225. CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Seul, A., Müller, J. J., Andres, D., Stettner, E., Heinemann, U. & Seckler, R. (2014). Acta Cryst. D70, 1336–1345. CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Smith, N. L., Taylor, E. J., Lindsay, A.-M., Charnock, S. J., Turkenburg, J. P., Dodson, E. J., Davies, G. J. & Black, G. W. (2005). Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 102, 17652–17657. CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Stoderegger, K. & Herndl, G. (1999). Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 189, 9–16. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Stoderegger, K. & Herndl, G. J. (1998). Limnol. Oceanogr. 43, 877–884. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Studier, F. W. (2005). Protein Expr. Purif. 41, 207–234. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Sutherland, I. W. (1995). FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 16, 323–347. CrossRef CAS PubMed Web of Science Google Scholar
Sutherland, I. W. (1999). Carbohydr. Polym. 38, 319–328. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Svergun, D. I. (1992). J. Appl. Cryst. 25, 495–503. CrossRef CAS Web of Science IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Svergun, D. I., Petoukhov, M. V. & Koch, M. H. J. (2001). Biophys. J. 80, 2946–2953. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Tickle, I. J., Flensburg, C., Keller, P., Paciorek, W., Sharff, A., Vonrhein, C. & Bricogne, G. (2016). STARANISO. Cambridge: Global Phasing Ltd. Google Scholar
Vagin, A. & Teplyakov, A. (2010). Acta Cryst. D66, 22–25. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Vincent, P., Pignet, P., Talmont, F., Bozzi, L., Fournet, B., Guezennec, J., Jeanthon, C. & Prieur, D. (1994). Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 60, 4134–4141. CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Xiang, Y., Leiman, P. G., Li, L., Grimes, S., Anderson, D. L. & Rossmann, M. G. (2009). Mol. Cell, 34, 375–386. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Zhang, L., Yan, Y., Gan, Q., She, Z., Zhu, K., Wang, J., Gao, Z., Dong, Y. & Gong, Y. (2020). Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 164, 4415–4422. CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Zimmermann, L., Stephens, A., Nam, S.-Z., Rau, D., Kübler, J., Lozajic, M., Gabler, F., Söding, J., Lupas, A. N. & Alva, V. (2018). J. Mol. Biol. 430, 2237–2243. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.

journal menu
access



