Issue contents
Download PDF of article
Download CIF
3D view
Navigation
Highlighting
Dictionary of Crystallography reference
IUPAC Gold Book reference
more ...
Download citation
FormatBIBTeX
EndNote
RefMan
Refer
Medline
CIF
SGML
Plain Text
share
Previous article
Next article
Previous article
Issue contents
Download PDF of article
Download CIF
3D view
Navigation
Highlighting
Dictionary of Crystallography reference
IUPAC Gold Book reference
more ...
Download citation
FormatBIBTeX
EndNote
RefMan
Refer
Medline
CIF
SGML
Plain Text
share
Next article

organic compounds\(\def\hfill{\hskip 5em}\def\hfil{\hskip 3em}\def\eqno#1{\hfil {#1}}\)

Journal logoCRYSTALLOGRAPHIC
COMMUNICATIONS
ISSN: 2056-9890
Volume 66| Part 1| January 2010| Pages o163-o164
doi:10.1107/S1600536809053410

Gabapentin-lactum–chloranilic acid (1/1)

Jerry P. Jasinski,a* Ray J. Butcher,b Q. N. M. Hakim Al-arique,c H. S. Yathirajanc and B. Narayanad

aDepartment of Chemistry, Keene State College, 229 Main Street, Keene, NH 03435-2001, USA, bDepartment of Chemistry, Howard University, 525 College Street NW, Washington, DC 20059, USA, cDepartment of Studies in Chemistry, University of Mysore, Manasagangotri, Mysore 570 006, India, and dDepartment of Studies in Chemistry, Mangalore University, Mangalagangotri 574 199, India
*Correspondence e-mail: jjasinski@keene.edu

(Received 6 December 2009; accepted 11 December 2009; online 16 December 2009)

In the title compound, C9H15NO·C6H2Cl2O4 [sytematic name: 2-aza­spiro­[4.5]decan-3-one–chloranilic acid (1/1)], the cyclo­hexane ring of the lactam molecule adopts a slightly distorted normal chair conformation and the five-membered 3-aza­spiro ring is in a slightly distorted chair conformation. The dihedral angle between the least-squares planes of the cyclohexane and 3-azaspiro rings is 84.0 (3)°. In the crystal, the chloranilic acid mol­ecule and the gabapentin-lactum mol­ecules are held together by strong inter­molecular N—H⋯O and O—H⋯O hydrogen bonds with two bifurcated O acceptor atoms on the chloranilic acid mol­ecule and one on the gabapentin-lactum mol­ecule, each bonding with an inter- and intra­molecular hydrogen bond. The molecules are linked into chains parallel to (011) and propagating along the b axis.

Related literature

For the neuroprotective properties of gabapentin-lactam and related compounds, see: Lagreze et al. (2001[Lagreze, W. A., Muller-Velten, R. & Feuerstein, T. J. (2001). Graefe's Arch. Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol. 239, 845-849.]); Henle et al. (2006[Henle, F., Leemhuis, J., Fischer, C., Bock, H. H., Lindemeyer, K., Feuerstein, T. J. & Meyer, D. K. (2006). J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 319, 181-191.]); Bowery (1993[Bowery, N. G. (1993). Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 33, 109-147.]). For the synthesis and spectroscopic studies of chloranilic acid charge-transfer complexes, see: Al-Attas et al. (2009[Al-Attas, A. S., Habeeb, M. M. & Al-Raimi, D. S. (2009). J. Mol. Struct. 928, 158-170.]). For related structures, see: Gotoh et al. (2008[Gotoh, K., Asaji, T. & Ishida, H. (2008). Acta Cryst. C64, o550-o553.]); Ibers (2001[Ibers, J. A. (2001). Acta Cryst. C57, 641-643.]); Ishida (2004[Ishida, H. (2004). Acta Cryst. E60, o1900-o1901.]); Ishida & Kashino (2000[Ishida, H. & Kashino, S. (2000). Acta Cryst. C56, e202-e204.]); Jasinski et al. (2009[Jasinski, J. P., Butcher, R. J., Yathirajan, H. S., Mallesha, L., Mohana, K. N. & Narayana, B. (2009). J. Chem. Crystallogr. 39, 777-780.]). For density functional theory (DFT), see: Frisch et al. (2004[Frisch, M. J., et al. (2004). GAUSSIAN03, Revision C01. Gaussian Inc., Wallingford, CT, USA.]); Hehre et al. (1986[Hehre, W. J., Random, L., Schleyer, P. V. R. & Pople, J. A. (1986). In Ab Initio Molecular Orbital Theory. New York: Wiley.]); Schmidt & Polik (2007[Schmidt, J. R. & Polik, W. F. (2007). WebMO Pro. WebMO, LLC: Holland, MI, USA, available from http://www.webmo.net.]).

[Scheme 1]

Experimental

Crystal data

  • C9H15NO·C6H2Cl2O4

  • Mr = 362.20

  • Triclinic, [P \overline 1]

  • a = 6.6127 (9) Å

  • b = 9.5800 (11) Å

  • c = 13.0724 (13) Å

  • α = 102.679 (9)°

  • β = 91.934 (9)°

  • γ = 98.481 (10)°

  • V = 797.23 (16) Å3

  • Z = 2

  • Cu Kα radiation

  • μ = 3.90 mm−1

  • T = 110 K

  • 0.47 × 0.42 × 0.15 mm
Data collection

  • Goniometer Xcalibur diffractometer with a Ruby (Gemini Cu) detector

  • Absorption correction: multi-scan (CrysAlis RED; Oxford Diffraction, 2007[Oxford Diffraction (2007). CrysAlis PRO and CrysAlis RED. Oxford Diffraction Ltd, Abingdon, England.]) Tmin = 0.200, Tmax = 0.557

  • 5138 measured reflections

  • 3123 independent reflections

  • 2731 reflections with I > 2σ(I)

  • Rint = 0.025
Refinement

  • R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.042

  • wR(F2) = 0.119

  • S = 1.05

  • 3123 reflections

  • 210 parameters

  • H-atom parameters constrained

  • Δρmax = 0.45 e Å−3

  • Δρmin = −0.40 e Å−3

Table 1
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯A D—H H⋯A D⋯A D—H⋯A
O1A—H1A⋯O2Ai 0.84 1.97 2.7493 (19) 153
O1A—H1A⋯O2A 0.84 2.20 2.671 (2) 115
O3A—H3A⋯O1Bii 0.84 1.70 2.4807 (19) 153
O3A—H3A⋯O4A 0.84 2.26 2.7148 (19) 114
N2B—H2BA⋯O1Bii 0.88 2.07 2.913 (2) 161
N2B—H2BA⋯O4A 0.88 2.53 3.091 (2) 122
Symmetry codes: (i) -x, -y, -z+1; (ii) -x+1, -y+2, -z+1.

Data collection: CrysAlis PRO (Oxford Diffraction, 2007[Oxford Diffraction (2007). CrysAlis PRO and CrysAlis RED. Oxford Diffraction Ltd, Abingdon, England.]); cell refinement: CrysAlis PRO; data reduction: CrysAlis PRO; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008[Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112-122.]); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008[Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112-122.]); molecular graphics: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008[Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112-122.]); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL.

Supporting information

Crystal structure: contains datablocks global, I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536809053410/ng2704sup1.cif

Structure factors: contains datablock I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536809053410/ng2704Isup2.hkl

checkCIF report


Comment top

Gabapentin-lactum (systematic name: 3-azaspiro-[4,5]-decan-2-one), is an intermediate for the preparation of gabapentin. Gabapentin-lactam (GBP-L) is also a derivative of the anti-convulsant drug gabapentin. The neuroprotective properties of gabapentin-lactam are described (Lagreze et al. 2001). Gabapentin is currently used as a therapeutic agent against epilepsy as well as neuropathic pain. In contrast to gabapentin, its derivative gabapentin-lactam has a pronounced neuroprotective activity (Henle et al. 2006). Gabapentin is structurally related to the neurotransmitteraminobutyric acid (GABA), which has been widely studied for its significant inhibitory action in the central nervous system (Bowery, 1993). We have recently reported a crystal structure of a second polymorph of gabapentin hydrochloride hemihydrate with a three-center bifurcated hydrogen bond (Jasinski et al. 2009).

Chloranilic acid is a strong dibasic organic acid which exhibits electron-acceptor properties on one hand and acidic properties leading to formation of hydrogen bonds on the other hand. In the case of stronger bases the proton-transfer, hydrogen bonded ion pairs will be formed which is interesting from the point of view of electron transfer reactions in biological systems. Also, protonation of the donor from acidic acceptors are generally a route for the formation of ion pair adducts. The synthesis and spectroscopic studies of charge transfer complexes between chloranilic acid and some heterocyclic amines in ethanol (Al-Attas, Habeeb & Al-Raimi, 2009) have been studied. In view of the importance of gabapentin-lactam, this paper reports the interaction of Gabapentin-lactam as an electron donor with chloranilic acid as an electron acceptor resulting in the formation of a charge transfer complex (I) while the two molecules are held together by intermolecular hydrogen bonding interactions.

The title compound,C9H15NO.C6H2Cl2O4,(I), is composed of two independent molecules, gabapentin-lactum (C9H15NO) and chloranilic acid (C6H2Cl2O4),in the asymmetric unit (1:1) (Fig.1). In the gabapentin-lactum molecule the cyclohexane ring (C4B—C9B) adopts a slightly distorted normal chair conformation and the 5-membered 3-Azaspiro ring is in a slightly distorted half-chair conformation The N2B and C1B atoms are sp2 hybridized while the C3B, C4B and C10B atoms are sp3. The C10B—C4B—C5B—C6B, N2B—C3B—C4B—C5B and N2B—C3B—C4B—C9B torsion angles are 177.77 (17)°, -136.89 (16)° and 101.19 (17)°, respectively, indicating a significant twist between the 3-azaspiro and cyclohexane rings while sharing a corner C4B atom. The dihedral angle between the least squares planes of these two rings measures 84.0 (3)°. The planar chloranilic acid molecule and gabapentin-lactum molecules are held together by N—H···O and O—H···O intermolecular hydrogen bonds with two bifurcated oxygen acceptor atoms on the chloranilic acid molecule (O2A & O4A) and one on the gabapentin-lactum molecule (O1B), each bifurcating with an inter and intra molecular hydrogen bond, respectively (Fig. 3, Table 1). This produces a set of O—H···O—H···O—H infinite chains along the b axis in (011). The O=C—N—H groups from the 3-azaspiro groups in adjacent gabapentin-lactum molecules form a R2,2(8) graph set motif, while the O=C—C—O—H groups from symmetry related chloranilic acid molecules form a R2,2(10) graph set motif in the unit cell (Fig. 3). The dihedral angles between mean planes of the chloranilic acid molecule and the 3-azaspiro and cyclohexane rings of the gabapentin-lactum molecule are 7.0 (1)° and 77.0 (1)°, respectively. In addition, weak Cg3···Cg3 [= 3.680 (1) Å; slippage = 1.825 Å; -x, 1 - y,1 - z] intermolecular interactions are observed where Cg3 = C1A–C6A, which contribute to crystal packing.

Following a geometry optimization, density functional theory (DFT) calculation at the B3LYP 6–31-G(d) level (Hehre et al., 1986; Schmidt & Polik, 2007) with the Gaussian03 program package (Frisch at al., 2004) the dihederal angle between the least squares planes of the 3-azaspiro and cyclohexane rings in the gabapentin-lactum molecule become 79.2 (9)° compared to 84.0 (3)° in the crystal. The dihedral angles between mean planes of the chloranilic acid molecule and the 3-azaspiro and cyclohexane rings of the gabapentin-lactum molecule become 2.0 (0)° and 77.2 (9)°, respectively, versus 7.0 (1)° and 77.0 (1)° observed in the crystal. Starting geometries were taken from X-ray refinement data. This suggests that strong N—H···O and O—H···O intermolecular hydrogen bonds and weak intermolecular Cg···Cg intermolecular interactions, collectively, influence crystal packing.

Related literature top

For the neuroprotective properties of gabapentin-lactam and related compounds, see: Lagreze et al. (2001); Henle et al. (2006); Bowery (1993). For the synthesis and spectroscopic studies of chloranilic acid charge-transfer complexes, see: Al-Attas et al. (2009). For related structures, see: Gotoh et al. (2008); Ibers (2001); Ishida (2004); Ishida & Kashino (2000); Jasinski et al. (2009). For density functional theory (DFT), see: Frisch et al. (2004); Hehre et al. (1986); Schmidt & Polik (2007).

Experimental top

The title compound was synthesized by adding a solution of chloranilic acid (0.42 g, 2 mmol) in 10 ml me thanol to a solution of gabapentin-lactam (0.21 g, 2 mmol) in 10 ml me thanol. A red color developed and the solution was allowed to evaporate slowly at room temperature. The red colored complex formed was filtered off, washed with diethyl ether and dried under vacuum. X-ray quality crystals were grown from methanol:water (80:20 v/v) solvent mixture (m.p.: 439–442 K). Analysis for C15H17Cl2NO5: Found (Calculated): C:49.68 (49.74); H: 4.70 (4.73); N:3.85 (3.87).

Refinement top

The hydroxyl and aza hydrogen atoms (H1A, H3A & H2B) were obtained from a difference fourier map. The rest of the H atoms were placed in their calculated positions and then refined using the riding model with O—H = 0.84 Å, N—H = 0.88 Å, C—H = 0.99 Å, and with Uiso(H) = 1.18–1.22Ueq(C,O,N).

Computing details top

Data collection: CrysAlis PRO (Oxford Diffraction, 2007); cell refinement: CrysAlis PRO (Oxford Diffraction, 2007); data reduction: CrysAlis PRO (Oxford Diffraction, 2007); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008).

Figures top
[Figure 1] Fig. 1. Molecular structure of C9H15NO.C6H2Cl2O4 showing the atom labeling scheme and 50% probability displacement ellipsoids. H atoms are presented as small circles of arbitrary radius.
[Figure 2] Fig. 2. Packing diagram of the title compound, (I), viewed down the a axis. Dashed lines indicate strong N—H···O and O—H···O intermoloecular hydrogen bonds linking the C9H15NO and C6H2Cl2O4 molecules into an infinite O—H···O—H···O—H chain network along the b axis in (011).
2-azaspiro[4.5]decan-3-one–chloranilic acid (1/1) top
Crystal data top
C9H15NO·C6H2Cl2O4Z = 2
Mr = 362.20F(000) = 376
Triclinic, P1Dx = 1.509 Mg m−3
Hall symbol: -P 1Cu Kα radiation, λ = 1.54184 Å
a = 6.6127 (9) ÅCell parameters from 3438 reflections
b = 9.5800 (11) Åθ = 4.8–74.0°
c = 13.0724 (13) ŵ = 3.90 mm−1
α = 102.679 (9)°T = 110 K
β = 91.934 (9)°Irregular plate, red-brown
γ = 98.481 (10)°0.47 × 0.42 × 0.15 mm
V = 797.23 (16) Å3
Data collection top
Goniometer Xcalibur
diffractometer with a Ruby (Gemini Cu) detector		3123 independent reflections
Radiation source: Enhance (Cu) X-ray Source2731 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromatorRint = 0.025
Detector resolution: 10.5081 pixels mm-1θmax = 74.2°, θmin = 4.8°
ω scansh = −8→5
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(CrysAlis RED; Oxford Diffraction, 2007)		k = −10→11
Tmin = 0.200, Tmax = 0.557l = −15→16
5138 measured reflections
Refinement top
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.042Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.119H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.05 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0762P)2 + 0.4046P]
where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
3123 reflections(Δ/σ)max = 0.001
210 parametersΔρmax = 0.45 e Å−3
0 restraintsΔρmin = −0.40 e Å−3
Crystal data top
C9H15NO·C6H2Cl2O4γ = 98.481 (10)°
Mr = 362.20V = 797.23 (16) Å3
Triclinic, P1Z = 2
a = 6.6127 (9) ÅCu Kα radiation
b = 9.5800 (11) ŵ = 3.90 mm−1
c = 13.0724 (13) ÅT = 110 K
α = 102.679 (9)°0.47 × 0.42 × 0.15 mm
β = 91.934 (9)°
Data collection top
Goniometer Xcalibur
diffractometer with a Ruby (Gemini Cu) detector		3123 independent reflections
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(CrysAlis RED; Oxford Diffraction, 2007)		2731 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Tmin = 0.200, Tmax = 0.557Rint = 0.025
5138 measured reflections
Refinement top
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.0420 restraints
wR(F2) = 0.119H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.05Δρmax = 0.45 e Å−3
3123 reflectionsΔρmin = −0.40 e Å−3
210 parameters
Special details top

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.

Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/Ueq
Cl10.07819 (8)0.35536 (5)0.25360 (3)0.02058 (15)
Cl20.30441 (7)0.39346 (5)0.73387 (3)0.01894 (15)
O1A0.0035 (2)0.11592 (14)0.36708 (11)0.0185 (3)
H1A−0.01010.05500.40480.022*
O2A0.1030 (2)0.13961 (14)0.57058 (11)0.0198 (3)
O3A0.3781 (2)0.63101 (14)0.62265 (11)0.0168 (3)
H3A0.38000.69580.58850.020*
O4A0.2633 (2)0.61192 (14)0.41806 (11)0.0174 (3)
C1A0.1342 (3)0.3619 (2)0.38385 (15)0.0142 (4)
C2A0.0914 (3)0.2440 (2)0.42497 (15)0.0149 (4)
C3A0.1454 (3)0.25105 (19)0.53885 (15)0.0142 (4)
C4A0.2436 (3)0.3875 (2)0.60388 (14)0.0139 (4)
C5A0.2870 (3)0.50807 (19)0.56472 (15)0.0134 (4)
C6A0.2301 (3)0.50147 (19)0.45017 (15)0.0132 (4)
O1B0.5433 (2)1.13507 (14)0.43096 (11)0.0189 (3)
C1B0.4590 (3)1.03933 (19)0.35294 (15)0.0147 (4)
N2B0.3806 (3)0.90640 (16)0.35775 (12)0.0158 (3)
H2BA0.39230.87310.41490.019*
C3B0.2729 (3)0.8193 (2)0.26005 (14)0.0163 (4)
H3BA0.12260.80810.26540.020*
H3BB0.31410.72200.24240.020*
C4B0.3395 (3)0.90694 (19)0.17620 (14)0.0155 (4)
C5B0.1561 (3)0.9111 (2)0.10248 (16)0.0214 (4)
H5BA0.04610.94840.14480.026*
H5BB0.19860.97850.05680.026*
C6B0.0727 (4)0.7610 (2)0.03391 (17)0.0288 (5)
H6BA0.01900.69560.07910.035*
H6BB−0.04180.7686−0.01430.035*
C7B0.2397 (4)0.6977 (3)−0.02991 (17)0.0320 (5)
H7BA0.28270.7577−0.08050.038*
H7BB0.18410.5986−0.07050.038*
C8B0.4253 (4)0.6919 (2)0.04056 (17)0.0278 (5)
H8BA0.53500.6579−0.00360.033*
H8BB0.38660.62160.08470.033*
C9B0.5062 (3)0.8409 (2)0.11141 (16)0.0198 (4)
H9BA0.56250.90730.06740.024*
H9BB0.61930.83180.15980.024*
C10B0.4297 (3)1.0593 (2)0.24256 (15)0.0175 (4)
H10A0.56211.09550.21700.021*
H10B0.33401.12880.23940.021*
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top
U11U22U33U12U13U23
Cl10.0306 (3)0.0172 (2)0.0145 (2)0.00588 (19)−0.00172 (18)0.00410 (18)
Cl20.0277 (3)0.0151 (2)0.0153 (2)0.00428 (18)−0.00131 (18)0.00606 (17)
O1A0.0265 (7)0.0099 (6)0.0176 (7)−0.0005 (5)0.0004 (6)0.0026 (5)
O2A0.0281 (8)0.0111 (6)0.0211 (7)0.0016 (6)0.0049 (6)0.0057 (5)
O3A0.0228 (7)0.0093 (6)0.0179 (7)−0.0007 (5)−0.0029 (5)0.0048 (5)
O4A0.0214 (7)0.0131 (7)0.0194 (7)0.0022 (5)0.0020 (5)0.0076 (5)
C1A0.0154 (9)0.0149 (9)0.0141 (9)0.0062 (7)0.0023 (7)0.0042 (7)
C2A0.0144 (9)0.0112 (8)0.0183 (9)0.0032 (7)0.0023 (7)0.0008 (7)
C3A0.0154 (9)0.0107 (9)0.0184 (9)0.0048 (7)0.0048 (7)0.0047 (7)
C4A0.0168 (9)0.0125 (9)0.0138 (9)0.0051 (7)0.0017 (7)0.0042 (7)
C5A0.0112 (9)0.0113 (9)0.0184 (9)0.0036 (7)0.0014 (7)0.0037 (7)
C6A0.0122 (8)0.0108 (9)0.0179 (9)0.0043 (7)0.0027 (7)0.0044 (7)
O1B0.0276 (8)0.0112 (6)0.0166 (7)−0.0010 (5)−0.0015 (6)0.0036 (5)
C1B0.0170 (9)0.0110 (8)0.0166 (9)0.0029 (7)0.0014 (7)0.0037 (7)
N2B0.0236 (8)0.0109 (7)0.0130 (8)0.0012 (6)−0.0001 (6)0.0044 (6)
C3B0.0245 (10)0.0116 (8)0.0123 (9)0.0004 (7)0.0009 (7)0.0032 (7)
C4B0.0224 (10)0.0106 (9)0.0138 (9)0.0024 (7)0.0013 (7)0.0038 (7)
C5B0.0251 (10)0.0216 (10)0.0192 (10)0.0078 (8)−0.0004 (8)0.0058 (8)
C6B0.0350 (12)0.0279 (12)0.0208 (10)0.0012 (9)−0.0075 (9)0.0034 (9)
C7B0.0492 (15)0.0252 (11)0.0174 (10)0.0041 (10)−0.0010 (10)−0.0022 (8)
C8B0.0413 (13)0.0195 (10)0.0229 (10)0.0115 (9)0.0078 (9)0.0002 (8)
C9B0.0245 (10)0.0173 (9)0.0193 (9)0.0054 (8)0.0042 (8)0.0060 (8)
C10B0.0268 (10)0.0112 (9)0.0155 (9)0.0030 (7)0.0024 (8)0.0049 (7)
Geometric parameters (Å, º) top
Cl1—C1A1.7158 (19)C3B—H3BB0.9900
Cl2—C4A1.7196 (18)C4B—C5B1.534 (3)
O1A—C2A1.330 (2)C4B—C9B1.538 (3)
O1A—H1A0.8400C4B—C10B1.546 (2)
O2A—C3A1.227 (2)C5B—C6B1.530 (3)
O3A—C5A1.301 (2)C5B—H5BA0.9900
O3A—H3A0.8400C5B—H5BB0.9900
O4A—C6A1.215 (2)C6B—C7B1.523 (3)
C1A—C2A1.352 (3)C6B—H6BA0.9900
C1A—C6A1.465 (3)C6B—H6BB0.9900
C2A—C3A1.504 (3)C7B—C8B1.525 (3)
C3A—C4A1.441 (3)C7B—H7BA0.9900
C4A—C5A1.361 (3)C7B—H7BB0.9900
C5A—C6A1.517 (3)C8B—C9B1.531 (3)
O1B—C1B1.262 (2)C8B—H8BA0.9900
C1B—N2B1.318 (2)C8B—H8BB0.9900
C1B—C10B1.507 (2)C9B—H9BA0.9900
N2B—C3B1.460 (2)C9B—H9BB0.9900
N2B—H2BA0.8800C10B—H10A0.9900
C3B—C4B1.558 (2)C10B—H10B0.9900
C3B—H3BA0.9900
C2A—O1A—H1A109.5C10B—C4B—C3B103.66 (14)
C5A—O3A—H3A109.5C6B—C5B—C4B111.76 (17)
C2A—C1A—C6A120.62 (17)C6B—C5B—H5BA109.3
C2A—C1A—Cl1121.97 (15)C4B—C5B—H5BA109.3
C6A—C1A—Cl1117.41 (14)C6B—C5B—H5BB109.3
O1A—C2A—C1A122.13 (17)C4B—C5B—H5BB109.3
O1A—C2A—C3A116.63 (16)H5BA—C5B—H5BB107.9
C1A—C2A—C3A121.23 (16)C7B—C6B—C5B110.90 (19)
O2A—C3A—C4A124.02 (17)C7B—C6B—H6BA109.5
O2A—C3A—C2A117.66 (17)C5B—C6B—H6BA109.5
C4A—C3A—C2A118.32 (16)C7B—C6B—H6BB109.5
C5A—C4A—C3A121.67 (17)C5B—C6B—H6BB109.5
C5A—C4A—Cl2120.66 (14)H6BA—C6B—H6BB108.0
C3A—C4A—Cl2117.67 (14)C6B—C7B—C8B111.52 (18)
O3A—C5A—C4A121.97 (17)C6B—C7B—H7BA109.3
O3A—C5A—C6A118.01 (16)C8B—C7B—H7BA109.3
C4A—C5A—C6A120.03 (16)C6B—C7B—H7BB109.3
O4A—C6A—C1A123.11 (17)C8B—C7B—H7BB109.3
O4A—C6A—C5A118.78 (16)H7BA—C7B—H7BB108.0
C1A—C6A—C5A118.10 (15)C7B—C8B—C9B111.18 (17)
O1B—C1B—N2B123.96 (17)C7B—C8B—H8BA109.4
O1B—C1B—C10B125.82 (16)C9B—C8B—H8BA109.4
N2B—C1B—C10B110.21 (16)C7B—C8B—H8BB109.4
C1B—N2B—C3B114.19 (15)C9B—C8B—H8BB109.4
C1B—N2B—H2BA122.9H8BA—C8B—H8BB108.0
C3B—N2B—H2BA122.9C8B—C9B—C4B112.62 (17)
N2B—C3B—C4B104.11 (15)C8B—C9B—H9BA109.1
N2B—C3B—H3BA110.9C4B—C9B—H9BA109.1
C4B—C3B—H3BA110.9C8B—C9B—H9BB109.1
N2B—C3B—H3BB110.9C4B—C9B—H9BB109.1
C4B—C3B—H3BB110.9H9BA—C9B—H9BB107.8
H3BA—C3B—H3BB109.0C1B—C10B—C4B105.01 (15)
C5B—C4B—C9B109.57 (15)C1B—C10B—H10A110.7
C5B—C4B—C10B111.96 (15)C4B—C10B—H10A110.7
C9B—C4B—C10B109.81 (16)C1B—C10B—H10B110.7
C5B—C4B—C3B111.08 (16)C4B—C10B—H10B110.7
C9B—C4B—C3B110.64 (15)H10A—C10B—H10B108.8
C6A—C1A—C2A—O1A179.69 (16)C4A—C5A—C6A—C1A−1.8 (3)
Cl1—C1A—C2A—O1A0.0 (3)O1B—C1B—N2B—C3B174.06 (18)
C6A—C1A—C2A—C3A−1.6 (3)C10B—C1B—N2B—C3B−5.0 (2)
Cl1—C1A—C2A—C3A178.76 (13)C1B—N2B—C3B—C4B14.0 (2)
O1A—C2A—C3A—O2A−0.8 (3)N2B—C3B—C4B—C5B−136.89 (16)
C1A—C2A—C3A—O2A−179.58 (18)N2B—C3B—C4B—C9B101.19 (17)
O1A—C2A—C3A—C4A179.11 (16)N2B—C3B—C4B—C10B−16.48 (19)
C1A—C2A—C3A—C4A0.3 (3)C9B—C4B—C5B—C6B55.7 (2)
O2A—C3A—C4A—C5A−179.95 (18)C10B—C4B—C5B—C6B177.77 (17)
C2A—C3A—C4A—C5A0.2 (3)C3B—C4B—C5B—C6B−66.9 (2)
O2A—C3A—C4A—Cl20.0 (3)C4B—C5B—C6B—C7B−57.1 (2)
C2A—C3A—C4A—Cl2−179.94 (13)C5B—C6B—C7B—C8B55.9 (2)
C3A—C4A—C5A—O3A−179.05 (16)C6B—C7B—C8B—C9B−54.4 (3)
Cl2—C4A—C5A—O3A1.1 (3)C7B—C8B—C9B—C4B54.4 (2)
C3A—C4A—C5A—C6A0.6 (3)C5B—C4B—C9B—C8B−54.5 (2)
Cl2—C4A—C5A—C6A−179.28 (13)C10B—C4B—C9B—C8B−177.91 (16)
C2A—C1A—C6A—O4A−176.63 (18)C3B—C4B—C9B—C8B68.3 (2)
Cl1—C1A—C6A—O4A3.0 (3)O1B—C1B—C10B—C4B174.58 (18)
C2A—C1A—C6A—C5A2.3 (3)N2B—C1B—C10B—C4B−6.4 (2)
Cl1—C1A—C6A—C5A−178.02 (13)C5B—C4B—C10B—C1B133.80 (17)
O3A—C5A—C6A—O4A−3.2 (3)C9B—C4B—C10B—C1B−104.25 (17)
C4A—C5A—C6A—O4A177.16 (17)C3B—C4B—C10B—C1B13.99 (19)
O3A—C5A—C6A—C1A177.86 (15)
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
O1A—H1A···O2Ai0.841.972.7493 (19)153
O1A—H1A···O2A0.842.202.671 (2)115
O3A—H3A···O1Bii0.841.702.4807 (19)153
O3A—H3A···O4A0.842.262.7148 (19)114
N2B—H2BA···O1Bii0.882.072.913 (2)161
N2B—H2BA···O4A0.882.533.091 (2)122
Symmetry codes: (i) −x, −y, −z+1; (ii) −x+1, −y+2, −z+1.

Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formulaC9H15NO·C6H2Cl2O4
Mr362.20
Crystal system, space groupTriclinic, P1
Temperature (K)110
a, b, c (Å)6.6127 (9), 9.5800 (11), 13.0724 (13)
α, β, γ (°)102.679 (9), 91.934 (9), 98.481 (10)
V (Å3)797.23 (16)
Z2
Radiation typeCu Kα
µ (mm−1)3.90
Crystal size (mm)0.47 × 0.42 × 0.15
Data collection
DiffractometerGoniometer Xcalibur
diffractometer with a Ruby (Gemini Cu) detector
Absorption correctionMulti-scan
(CrysAlis RED; Oxford Diffraction, 2007)
Tmin, Tmax0.200, 0.557
No. of measured, independent and
observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections		5138, 3123, 2731
Rint0.025
(sin θ/λ)max (Å−1)0.624
Refinement
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S 0.042, 0.119, 1.05
No. of reflections3123
No. of parameters210
H-atom treatmentH-atom parameters constrained
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å−3)0.45, −0.40

Computer programs: CrysAlis PRO (Oxford Diffraction, 2007), SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008), SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008), SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008).

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
O1A—H1A···O2Ai0.841.972.7493 (19)153.1
O1A—H1A···O2A0.842.202.671 (2)115.2
O3A—H3A···O1Bii0.841.702.4807 (19)153.4
O3A—H3A···O4A0.842.262.7148 (19)114.0
N2B—H2BA···O1Bii0.882.072.913 (2)161.3
N2B—H2BA···O4A0.882.533.091 (2)122.2
Symmetry codes: (i) −x, −y, −z+1; (ii) −x+1, −y+2, −z+1.
 

Acknowledgements

QNMHA thanks the University of Mysore for use of their research facilities. RJB acknowledges the NSF MRI program (grant No. CHE-0619278) for funds to purchase an X-ray diffractometer.

References

First citationAl-Attas, A. S., Habeeb, M. M. & Al-Raimi, D. S. (2009). J. Mol. Struct. 928, 158–170.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
 First citationBowery, N. G. (1993). Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 33, 109–147.  CrossRef CAS PubMed Web of Science Google Scholar
 First citationFrisch, M. J., et al. (2004). GAUSSIAN03, Revision C01. Gaussian Inc., Wallingford, CT, USA.  Google Scholar
 First citationGotoh, K., Asaji, T. & Ishida, H. (2008). Acta Cryst. C64, o550–o553.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
 First citationHehre, W. J., Random, L., Schleyer, P. V. R. & Pople, J. A. (1986). In Ab Initio Molecular Orbital Theory. New York: Wiley.  Google Scholar
 First citationHenle, F., Leemhuis, J., Fischer, C., Bock, H. H., Lindemeyer, K., Feuerstein, T. J. & Meyer, D. K. (2006). J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 319, 181–191.  Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
 First citationIbers, J. A. (2001). Acta Cryst. C57, 641–643.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
 First citationIshida, H. (2004). Acta Cryst. E60, o1900–o1901.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
 First citationIshida, H. & Kashino, S. (2000). Acta Cryst. C56, e202–e204.  CSD CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
 First citationJasinski, J. P., Butcher, R. J., Yathirajan, H. S., Mallesha, L., Mohana, K. N. & Narayana, B. (2009). J. Chem. Crystallogr. 39, 777–780.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
 First citationLagreze, W. A., Muller-Velten, R. & Feuerstein, T. J. (2001). Graefe's Arch. Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol. 239, 845–849.  Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
 First citationOxford Diffraction (2007). CrysAlis PRO and CrysAlis RED. Oxford Diffraction Ltd, Abingdon, England.  Google Scholar
 First citationSchmidt, J. R. & Polik, W. F. (2007). WebMO Pro. WebMO, LLC: Holland, MI, USA, available from http://www.webmo.net.  Google Scholar
 First citationSheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.

Journal logoCRYSTALLOGRAPHIC
COMMUNICATIONS
ISSN: 2056-9890
Volume 66| Part 1| January 2010| Pages o163-o164
doi:10.1107/S1600536809053410
Follow Acta Cryst. E
Sign up for e-alerts
E-alerts
Follow Acta Cryst. on Twitter
Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds
RSS