metal-organic compounds
Aquabis(1-methyl-1H-imidazole-κN3)bis(nitrato-κO)copper(II)
aOrdered Matter Science Research Center, College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing 211189, People's Republic of China
*Correspondence e-mail: zhurunqiang@163.com
The title complex molecule, [Cu(NO3)2(C4H6N2)2(H2O)], has crystallographically imposed twofold symmetry. The CuII atom displays a distorted square-pyramidal CuN2O3 coordination geometry. In the crystal, intermolecular O—H⋯O hydrogen bonds between the coordinated water molecule and the nitrate anions form chains parallel to the c axis.
Related literature
The title compound was studied as part of our work to obtain potential ferroelectric phase-change materials. For general background to ferroelectric metal-organic frameworks, see: Fu et al. (2009); Ye et al. (2006); Zhang et al. (2008, 2010).
Experimental
Crystal data
|
Refinement
|
Data collection: CrystalClear (Rigaku, 2005); cell CrystalClear; data reduction: CrystalClear; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXL97.
Supporting information
https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600536810047525/rz2515sup1.cif
contains datablocks I, global. DOI:Structure factors: contains datablock I. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600536810047525/rz2515Isup2.hkl
An aqueous solution of 1-methyl-1H-imidazole (1.64 g, 20 mmol) and H2SO4 (0.98 g, 10 mmol) was treated with CuSO4 (2.5 g, 10 mmol). After the mixture was churned for a few minutes, Ba(NO2)2 (5 g, 20 mmol) was added to give a blue solution. Slow evaporation of the resulting solution yielded blue crystals after a few days.
All H atoms were placed in geometrically idealized positions and constrained to ride on their parent atoms with C—H = 0.93–0.96 Å, O—H = 0.85 Å, and with Uiso(H) = 1.2 Uiso(C, O) or 1.5 Uiso(C) for methyl H atoms.
Dielectric constant measurements of compounds as a function of temperature is the basic method to find potential ferroelectric phase change materials (Fu et al., 2009; Ye et al., 2006; Zhang et al., 2008; Zhang et al., 2010). Unfortunately, the study carried out on the title compound indicated that the permittivity is temperature-independent, suggesting that there may be no dielectric disuniformity between 80 K to 350 K (m.p. 393–381 K). In this report the
of the title compound is reported.The title complex molecules has crystallographically imposed twofold symmetry (Fig. 1). The copper(II) metal centre is five-coordinated in a distorted square-planar geometry by two nitrogen atoms from two 1-methyl-1H-imidazole ligands and two oxygen atoms from two NO3- defining the basal plane, and a coordinated water at the apex. The Cu–N and Cu–O bond lengths are not exceptional. In the crystal packing, intermolecular O—H···O hydrogen bonds (Table 1) between the coordinate water molecules and nitrate ions form chains along the c axis (Fig. 2).
The title compound was studied as part of our work to obtain potential ferroelectric phase-change materials. For general background to ferroelectric metal-organic frameworks, see: Fu et al. (2009); Ye et al. (2006); Zhang et al. (2008, 2010).
Data collection: CrystalClear (Rigaku, 2005); cell
CrystalClear (Rigaku, 2005); data reduction: CrystalClear (Rigaku, 2005); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008).[Cu(NO3)2(C4H6N2)2(H2O)] | F(000) = 756 |
Mr = 369.78 | Dx = 1.613 Mg m−3 |
Monoclinic, C2/c | Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å |
Hall symbol: -C 2yc | Cell parameters from 3705 reflections |
a = 11.864 (2) Å | θ = 3.0–27.5° |
b = 12.242 (2) Å | µ = 1.48 mm−1 |
c = 10.509 (2) Å | T = 293 K |
β = 93.98 (3)° | Block, blue |
V = 1522.6 (5) Å3 | 0.30 × 0.25 × 0.20 mm |
Z = 4 |
Rigaku SCXmini diffractometer | 1742 independent reflections |
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube | 1608 reflections with I > 2σ(I) |
Graphite monochromator | Rint = 0.031 |
CCD_Profile_fitting scans | θmax = 27.5°, θmin = 3.0° |
Absorption correction: multi-scan (CrystalClear; Rigaku, 2005) | h = −15→15 |
Tmin = 0.640, Tmax = 0.740 | k = −15→15 |
7712 measured reflections | l = −13→13 |
Refinement on F2 | Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods |
Least-squares matrix: full | Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.033 | Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites |
wR(F2) = 0.088 | H-atom parameters constrained |
S = 1.14 | w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0453P)2 + 0.8389P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3 |
1742 reflections | (Δ/σ)max < 0.001 |
102 parameters | Δρmax = 0.45 e Å−3 |
0 restraints | Δρmin = −0.37 e Å−3 |
[Cu(NO3)2(C4H6N2)2(H2O)] | V = 1522.6 (5) Å3 |
Mr = 369.78 | Z = 4 |
Monoclinic, C2/c | Mo Kα radiation |
a = 11.864 (2) Å | µ = 1.48 mm−1 |
b = 12.242 (2) Å | T = 293 K |
c = 10.509 (2) Å | 0.30 × 0.25 × 0.20 mm |
β = 93.98 (3)° |
Rigaku SCXmini diffractometer | 1742 independent reflections |
Absorption correction: multi-scan (CrystalClear; Rigaku, 2005) | 1608 reflections with I > 2σ(I) |
Tmin = 0.640, Tmax = 0.740 | Rint = 0.031 |
7712 measured reflections |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.033 | 0 restraints |
wR(F2) = 0.088 | H-atom parameters constrained |
S = 1.14 | Δρmax = 0.45 e Å−3 |
1742 reflections | Δρmin = −0.37 e Å−3 |
102 parameters |
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes. |
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger. |
x | y | z | Uiso*/Ueq | Occ. (<1) | |
C1 | 0.3268 (2) | 0.4147 (2) | 0.0458 (2) | 0.0496 (5) | |
H1A | 0.3799 | 0.4495 | −0.0012 | 0.060* | |
C2 | 0.2500 (2) | 0.3234 (2) | 0.1908 (2) | 0.0505 (5) | |
H2 | 0.2402 | 0.2830 | 0.2641 | 0.061* | |
C3 | 0.1669 (2) | 0.3521 (2) | 0.1028 (3) | 0.0543 (6) | |
H3A | 0.0905 | 0.3354 | 0.1042 | 0.065* | |
C4 | 0.1617 (3) | 0.4595 (3) | −0.1034 (3) | 0.0765 (9) | |
H4A | 0.1108 | 0.5157 | −0.0797 | 0.115* | |
H4B | 0.1203 | 0.4044 | −0.1519 | 0.115* | |
H4C | 0.2178 | 0.4906 | −0.1541 | 0.115* | |
Cu1 | 0.5000 | 0.36656 (3) | 0.2500 | 0.03738 (14) | |
N1 | 0.35145 (16) | 0.36341 (14) | 0.15477 (17) | 0.0427 (4) | |
N2 | 0.21687 (16) | 0.41042 (16) | 0.01160 (19) | 0.0493 (4) | |
N3 | 0.58487 (15) | 0.27708 (16) | 0.03266 (17) | 0.0462 (4) | |
O1 | 0.5000 | 0.5610 (2) | 0.2500 | 0.0700 (8) | |
H1B | 0.5267 | 0.5958 | 0.1888 | 0.084* | 0.50 |
H1C | 0.4733 | 0.5958 | 0.3112 | 0.084* | 0.50 |
O2 | 0.57326 (14) | 0.37175 (12) | 0.08207 (15) | 0.0473 (4) | |
O3 | 0.60599 (18) | 0.27180 (18) | −0.08000 (16) | 0.0715 (6) | |
O4 | 0.57213 (17) | 0.19602 (15) | 0.09852 (17) | 0.0650 (5) |
U11 | U22 | U33 | U12 | U13 | U23 | |
C1 | 0.0505 (12) | 0.0489 (12) | 0.0495 (12) | −0.0099 (10) | 0.0038 (10) | 0.0080 (10) |
C2 | 0.0491 (12) | 0.0617 (14) | 0.0414 (11) | −0.0145 (11) | 0.0085 (9) | 0.0018 (10) |
C3 | 0.0433 (12) | 0.0639 (15) | 0.0559 (14) | −0.0101 (10) | 0.0051 (10) | −0.0042 (11) |
C4 | 0.0762 (19) | 0.0697 (18) | 0.080 (2) | −0.0042 (15) | −0.0213 (16) | 0.0228 (15) |
Cu1 | 0.0392 (2) | 0.0413 (2) | 0.0326 (2) | 0.000 | 0.00887 (13) | 0.000 |
N1 | 0.0436 (9) | 0.0461 (10) | 0.0391 (9) | −0.0060 (7) | 0.0072 (7) | −0.0004 (7) |
N2 | 0.0522 (11) | 0.0427 (10) | 0.0520 (11) | −0.0038 (8) | −0.0038 (9) | 0.0025 (8) |
N3 | 0.0437 (9) | 0.0580 (11) | 0.0371 (9) | 0.0025 (8) | 0.0052 (7) | −0.0051 (8) |
O1 | 0.096 (2) | 0.0467 (14) | 0.0651 (16) | 0.000 | −0.0127 (15) | 0.000 |
O2 | 0.0532 (9) | 0.0481 (9) | 0.0422 (8) | −0.0034 (6) | 0.0152 (7) | −0.0010 (6) |
O3 | 0.0866 (14) | 0.0926 (15) | 0.0375 (9) | 0.0187 (11) | 0.0187 (8) | −0.0079 (9) |
O4 | 0.0866 (13) | 0.0497 (10) | 0.0582 (10) | −0.0069 (9) | 0.0013 (9) | 0.0026 (8) |
C1—N1 | 1.321 (3) | C4—H4C | 0.9600 |
C1—N2 | 1.330 (3) | Cu1—N1i | 1.9658 (19) |
C1—H1A | 0.9300 | Cu1—N1 | 1.9658 (19) |
C2—C3 | 1.350 (3) | Cu1—O2i | 2.0216 (16) |
C2—N1 | 1.377 (3) | Cu1—O2 | 2.0216 (16) |
C2—H2 | 0.9300 | Cu1—O1 | 2.381 (3) |
C3—N2 | 1.363 (3) | N3—O4 | 1.225 (3) |
C3—H3A | 0.9300 | N3—O3 | 1.229 (2) |
C4—N2 | 1.463 (3) | N3—O2 | 1.281 (2) |
C4—H4A | 0.9600 | O1—H1B | 0.8500 |
C4—H4B | 0.9600 | O1—H1C | 0.8500 |
N1—C1—N2 | 111.7 (2) | N1—Cu1—O2 | 88.90 (8) |
N1—C1—H1A | 124.2 | O2i—Cu1—O2 | 176.40 (9) |
N2—C1—H1A | 124.2 | N1i—Cu1—O1 | 91.12 (5) |
C3—C2—N1 | 109.3 (2) | N1—Cu1—O1 | 91.12 (5) |
C3—C2—H2 | 125.4 | O2i—Cu1—O1 | 88.20 (4) |
N1—C2—H2 | 125.4 | O2—Cu1—O1 | 88.20 (4) |
C2—C3—N2 | 106.6 (2) | C1—N1—C2 | 105.21 (19) |
C2—C3—H3A | 126.7 | C1—N1—Cu1 | 124.65 (16) |
N2—C3—H3A | 126.7 | C2—N1—Cu1 | 129.59 (15) |
N2—C4—H4A | 109.5 | C1—N2—C3 | 107.3 (2) |
N2—C4—H4B | 109.5 | C1—N2—C4 | 125.5 (2) |
H4A—C4—H4B | 109.5 | C3—N2—C4 | 127.2 (2) |
N2—C4—H4C | 109.5 | O4—N3—O3 | 122.9 (2) |
H4A—C4—H4C | 109.5 | O4—N3—O2 | 118.86 (17) |
H4B—C4—H4C | 109.5 | O3—N3—O2 | 118.2 (2) |
N1i—Cu1—N1 | 177.76 (10) | Cu1—O1—H1B | 120.0 |
N1i—Cu1—O2i | 88.90 (8) | Cu1—O1—H1C | 120.0 |
N1—Cu1—O2i | 91.17 (8) | H1B—O1—H1C | 120.0 |
N1i—Cu1—O2 | 91.17 (8) | N3—O2—Cu1 | 112.97 (12) |
Symmetry code: (i) −x+1, y, −z+1/2. |
D—H···A | D—H | H···A | D···A | D—H···A |
O1—H1B···O3ii | 0.85 | 2.48 | 2.941 (3) | 115 |
O1—H1C···O3iii | 0.85 | 2.48 | 2.941 (3) | 115 |
Symmetry codes: (ii) −x+1, −y+1, −z; (iii) x, −y+1, z+1/2. |
Experimental details
Crystal data | |
Chemical formula | [Cu(NO3)2(C4H6N2)2(H2O)] |
Mr | 369.78 |
Crystal system, space group | Monoclinic, C2/c |
Temperature (K) | 293 |
a, b, c (Å) | 11.864 (2), 12.242 (2), 10.509 (2) |
β (°) | 93.98 (3) |
V (Å3) | 1522.6 (5) |
Z | 4 |
Radiation type | Mo Kα |
µ (mm−1) | 1.48 |
Crystal size (mm) | 0.30 × 0.25 × 0.20 |
Data collection | |
Diffractometer | Rigaku SCXmini |
Absorption correction | Multi-scan (CrystalClear; Rigaku, 2005) |
Tmin, Tmax | 0.640, 0.740 |
No. of measured, independent and observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections | 7712, 1742, 1608 |
Rint | 0.031 |
(sin θ/λ)max (Å−1) | 0.649 |
Refinement | |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S | 0.033, 0.088, 1.14 |
No. of reflections | 1742 |
No. of parameters | 102 |
H-atom treatment | H-atom parameters constrained |
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å−3) | 0.45, −0.37 |
Computer programs: CrystalClear (Rigaku, 2005), SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008), SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008), SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008).
D—H···A | D—H | H···A | D···A | D—H···A |
O1—H1B···O3i | 0.85 | 2.48 | 2.941 (3) | 114.7 |
O1—H1C···O3ii | 0.85 | 2.48 | 2.941 (3) | 114.7 |
Symmetry codes: (i) −x+1, −y+1, −z; (ii) x, −y+1, z+1/2. |
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by a start-up grant from Southeast University.
References
Fu, D.-W., Ge, J.-Z., Dai, J., Ye, H.-Y. & Qu, Z.-R. (2009). Inorg. Chem. Commun. 12, 994–997. Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Rigaku (2005). CrystalClear. Rigaku Corporation, Tokyo, Japan. Google Scholar
Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Ye, Q., Song, Y.-M., Wang, G.-X., Chen, K. & Fu, D.-W. (2006). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 128, 6554–6555. Web of Science CSD CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Zhang, W., Xiong, R.-G. & Huang, S.-P. D. (2008). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 130, 10468–10469. Web of Science CSD CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Zhang, W., Ye, H.-Y., Cai, H.-L., Ge, J.-Z. & Xiong, R.-G. (2010). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 132, 7300–7302. Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.
Dielectric constant measurements of compounds as a function of temperature is the basic method to find potential ferroelectric phase change materials (Fu et al., 2009; Ye et al., 2006; Zhang et al., 2008; Zhang et al., 2010). Unfortunately, the study carried out on the title compound indicated that the permittivity is temperature-independent, suggesting that there may be no dielectric disuniformity between 80 K to 350 K (m.p. 393–381 K). In this report the crystal structure of the title compound is reported.
The title complex molecules has crystallographically imposed twofold symmetry (Fig. 1). The copper(II) metal centre is five-coordinated in a distorted square-planar geometry by two nitrogen atoms from two 1-methyl-1H-imidazole ligands and two oxygen atoms from two NO3- defining the basal plane, and a coordinated water at the apex. The Cu–N and Cu–O bond lengths are not exceptional. In the crystal packing, intermolecular O—H···O hydrogen bonds (Table 1) between the coordinate water molecules and nitrate ions form chains along the c axis (Fig. 2).