metal-organic compounds
Two-dimensional polymeric [Hg4(μ2-I)6I2(μ2-C4S6)]n
aInstitut UTINAM UMR CNRS 6213, Université de Franche-Comté, 16 Route de Gray, La Bouloie, 25030 Besançon, France, and bAnorganische Chemie, Technische Universität Dortmund, Otto-Hahn-Strasse 6, 44227 Dortmund, Germany
*Correspondence e-mail: mail@carsten-strohmann.de
The title compound, poly[(μ2-2H,5H-1,3-dithiolo[4,5-d][1,3]dithiole-2,5-dithione)hexa-μ2-iodido-diiodidotetramercury(II)], [Hg4I8(C4S6)]n, represents the first example of a coordination polymer assembled by the α,α-C4S6 dithione ligand. The HgII ions are four-coordinated in a distorted tetrahedral geometry, the coordination demand being satisfied either by four bridging iodide ligands or by three iodide ligands (one terminal and two bridging) and a thiocarbonyl S atom. Due to the bridging nature of the dithione ligand, the coordination polymer has a two-dimensional structure, built up of undulated layers parallel to (001). There is an inversion center at the mid-point of the central C=C double bond.
Related literature
For the synthesis and structure of the α,α-C4S6 ligand, see: Krug et al. (1977); Beck et al. (2006). For related studies on polymeric binary carbon see: Galloway et al. (1994). For the synthesis and structures of coordination polymers with sulfur-rich ligands, see: Peindy et al. (2005); Hameau et al. (2006); Ndiaye et al. (2007); Guyon et al. (2008).
Experimental
Crystal data
|
Data collection: SMART (Bruker, 2001); cell SAINT-Plus (Bruker, 1999); data reduction: SAINT-Plus; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: ORTEP-3 (Farrugia, 1997); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXL97.
Supporting information
10.1107/S1600536811006556/fi2103sup1.cif
contains datablocks I, global. DOI:Structure factors: contains datablock I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811006556/fi2103Isup2.hkl
The α,α-C4S6 ligand was prepared as described previously (Beck et al., 2006). To the α,α-C4S6 dithione (14 mg, 58 µmol) dissolved in 13.5 ml of a solvent mixture (toluene/acetonitrile/chlorobenzene in 2/1/1 ratio) was added upon stirring a solution of HgI2 (53 mg, 116 µmol) in toluene (10 ml). The resulting solution was refluxed for 0.2 h., then allowed to reach room temperature and filtered. Dark red crystals suitable for X-ray analysis were obtained by slow evaporation of the solution (yield 85%). IR (KBr): ν C═S = 1036 cm-1.
The largest Fourier peak/hole (3.56 and –3.29 e/Å3, respectively) are found 0.95 and 0.68Å from Hg1 (see even extra table).
Data collection: SMART (Bruker, 2001); cell
SAINT-Plus (Bruker, 1999); data reduction: SAINT-Plus (Bruker, 1999); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: ORTEP-3 (Farrugia, 1997); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008).Fig. 1. A view of the title compound along (001). Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 50% probability level. Symmetry operations: (i) -x, -y+2, -z+2; (ii) -x, -y+1, -z+2; (iii) -x+1, -y+1, -z+2. |
[Hg4I8(C4S6)] | F(000) = 1728 |
Mr = 1028.98 | Dx = 5.295 Mg m−3 |
Monoclinic, P21/c | Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å |
Hall symbol: -P 2ybc | Cell parameters from 8987 reflections |
a = 8.5502 (6) Å | θ = 2.4–26° |
b = 11.2156 (8) Å | µ = 33.76 mm−1 |
c = 13.4634 (9) Å | T = 173 K |
β = 91.343 (1)° | Needle, dark red |
V = 1290.73 (16) Å3 | 0.30 × 0.10 × 0.10 mm |
Z = 4 |
Bruker APEX CCD diffractometer | 2543 independent reflections |
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube | 2337 reflections with I > 2σ(I) |
Graphite monochromator | Rint = 0.086 |
ω scans | θmax = 26.0°, θmin = 2.4° |
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 1999) | h = −10→10 |
Tmin = 0.035, Tmax = 0.133 | k = −13→13 |
24415 measured reflections | l = −16→16 |
Refinement on F2 | 0 restraints |
Least-squares matrix: full | Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.039 | Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map |
wR(F2) = 0.114 | w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.077P)2 + 7.1937P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3 |
S = 1.03 | (Δ/σ)max = 0.001 |
2543 reflections | Δρmax = 3.56 e Å−3 |
100 parameters | Δρmin = −3.29 e Å−3 |
[Hg4I8(C4S6)] | V = 1290.73 (16) Å3 |
Mr = 1028.98 | Z = 4 |
Monoclinic, P21/c | Mo Kα radiation |
a = 8.5502 (6) Å | µ = 33.76 mm−1 |
b = 11.2156 (8) Å | T = 173 K |
c = 13.4634 (9) Å | 0.30 × 0.10 × 0.10 mm |
β = 91.343 (1)° |
Bruker APEX CCD diffractometer | 2543 independent reflections |
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 1999) | 2337 reflections with I > 2σ(I) |
Tmin = 0.035, Tmax = 0.133 | Rint = 0.086 |
24415 measured reflections |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.039 | 100 parameters |
wR(F2) = 0.114 | 0 restraints |
S = 1.03 | Δρmax = 3.56 e Å−3 |
2543 reflections | Δρmin = −3.29 e Å−3 |
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes. |
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger. |
x | y | z | Uiso*/Ueq | ||
C1 | 0.0263 (12) | 0.9542 (9) | 1.0288 (7) | 0.029 (2) | |
C2 | 0.2439 (12) | 0.9942 (9) | 0.9076 (8) | 0.033 (2) | |
Hg1 | 0.51629 (6) | 0.77041 (5) | 0.83365 (5) | 0.05585 (19) | |
Hg2 | 0.22624 (7) | 0.46970 (6) | 0.97826 (5) | 0.0672 (2) | |
I1 | 0.82359 (9) | 0.77867 (6) | 0.83985 (5) | 0.0374 (2) | |
I2 | 0.25603 (8) | 0.64475 (6) | 0.79810 (5) | 0.0372 (2) | |
I3 | 0.08558 (9) | 0.60123 (6) | 1.11662 (5) | 0.03616 (19) | |
I4 | 0.45656 (8) | 0.32667 (6) | 0.92556 (5) | 0.03444 (19) | |
S1 | 0.2076 (3) | 0.8973 (2) | 1.0033 (2) | 0.0374 (6) | |
S2 | 0.4123 (3) | 0.9968 (3) | 0.8465 (2) | 0.0427 (6) | |
S3 | −0.0987 (3) | 0.9043 (2) | 1.1185 (2) | 0.0363 (6) |
U11 | U22 | U33 | U12 | U13 | U23 | |
C1 | 0.025 (5) | 0.035 (5) | 0.028 (5) | −0.001 (4) | 0.003 (4) | 0.002 (4) |
C2 | 0.031 (5) | 0.029 (5) | 0.039 (5) | −0.002 (4) | 0.003 (4) | −0.001 (4) |
Hg1 | 0.0325 (3) | 0.0672 (4) | 0.0682 (4) | −0.0029 (2) | 0.0078 (2) | 0.0044 (3) |
Hg2 | 0.0477 (4) | 0.0668 (4) | 0.0881 (5) | 0.0157 (3) | 0.0243 (3) | −0.0110 (3) |
I1 | 0.0303 (4) | 0.0452 (4) | 0.0369 (4) | −0.0012 (3) | 0.0048 (3) | −0.0032 (3) |
I2 | 0.0332 (4) | 0.0424 (4) | 0.0359 (4) | −0.0019 (3) | 0.0013 (3) | 0.0038 (3) |
I3 | 0.0351 (4) | 0.0365 (4) | 0.0369 (4) | −0.0014 (3) | 0.0029 (3) | −0.0047 (3) |
I4 | 0.0305 (4) | 0.0404 (4) | 0.0326 (4) | 0.0048 (3) | 0.0041 (3) | −0.0024 (3) |
S1 | 0.0310 (14) | 0.0406 (14) | 0.0410 (14) | 0.0074 (11) | 0.0101 (11) | 0.0073 (11) |
S2 | 0.0350 (15) | 0.0365 (13) | 0.0576 (17) | 0.0020 (11) | 0.0205 (13) | 0.0038 (12) |
S3 | 0.0339 (14) | 0.0372 (13) | 0.0383 (13) | 0.0051 (10) | 0.0128 (11) | 0.0067 (11) |
C1—C1i | 1.36 (2) | Hg1—S2 | 2.697 (3) |
C1—S1 | 1.718 (11) | Hg2—I4 | 2.6496 (9) |
C1—S3 | 1.724 (11) | Hg2—I3 | 2.6828 (9) |
C2—S2 | 1.675 (11) | Hg2—I3ii | 3.0353 (10) |
C2—S3i | 1.715 (11) | Hg2—I2 | 3.1357 (10) |
C2—S1 | 1.720 (11) | I3—Hg2ii | 3.0353 (10) |
Hg1—I1 | 2.6285 (9) | S3—C2i | 1.715 (11) |
Hg1—I2 | 2.6678 (9) | ||
C1i—C1—S1 | 117.1 (11) | I4—Hg2—I3ii | 112.31 (3) |
C1i—C1—S3 | 116.3 (11) | I3—Hg2—I3ii | 91.87 (3) |
S1—C1—S3 | 126.6 (6) | I4—Hg2—I2 | 95.60 (3) |
S2—C2—S3i | 121.0 (6) | I3—Hg2—I2 | 103.81 (3) |
S2—C2—S1 | 123.4 (6) | I3ii—Hg2—I2 | 85.70 (3) |
S3i—C2—S1 | 115.5 (6) | Hg1—I2—Hg2 | 105.93 (3) |
I1—Hg1—I2 | 148.57 (3) | Hg2—I3—Hg2ii | 88.13 (3) |
I1—Hg1—S2 | 107.19 (7) | C1—S1—C2 | 95.4 (5) |
I2—Hg1—S2 | 103.53 (7) | C2—S2—Hg1 | 107.7 (4) |
I4—Hg2—I3 | 150.11 (4) | C2i—S3—C1 | 95.7 (5) |
Symmetry codes: (i) −x, −y+2, −z+2; (ii) −x, −y+1, −z+2. |
Experimental details
Crystal data | |
Chemical formula | [Hg4I8(C4S6)] |
Mr | 1028.98 |
Crystal system, space group | Monoclinic, P21/c |
Temperature (K) | 173 |
a, b, c (Å) | 8.5502 (6), 11.2156 (8), 13.4634 (9) |
β (°) | 91.343 (1) |
V (Å3) | 1290.73 (16) |
Z | 4 |
Radiation type | Mo Kα |
µ (mm−1) | 33.76 |
Crystal size (mm) | 0.30 × 0.10 × 0.10 |
Data collection | |
Diffractometer | Bruker APEX CCD diffractometer |
Absorption correction | Multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 1999) |
Tmin, Tmax | 0.035, 0.133 |
No. of measured, independent and observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections | 24415, 2543, 2337 |
Rint | 0.086 |
(sin θ/λ)max (Å−1) | 0.617 |
Refinement | |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S | 0.039, 0.114, 1.03 |
No. of reflections | 2543 |
No. of parameters | 100 |
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å−3) | 3.56, −3.29 |
Computer programs: SMART (Bruker, 2001), SAINT-Plus (Bruker, 1999), SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008), SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008), ORTEP-3 (Farrugia, 1997).
Qx | nearest atom | distance | value |
-Q1 | Hg1 | 0.68 | -3.29 |
Q1 | Hg1 | 0.951 | 3.56 |
Q2 | Hg2 | 0.994 | 1.67 |
Q3 | Hg2 | 0.770 | 1.49 |
Q4 | I3 | 0.797 | 1.07 |
Q5 | Hg1 | 1.256 | 0.92 |
Q6 | I3 | 0.688 | 0.92 |
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft and the Fonds der Chemischen Industrie.
References
Beck, J., Daniels, J., Roloff, A. & Wagner, N. (2006). Dalton Trans. pp. 1174–1180. Web of Science CSD CrossRef Google Scholar
Bruker (1999). SADABS and SAINT-Plus. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA. Google Scholar
Bruker (2001). SMART. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA. Google Scholar
Farrugia, L. J. (1997). J. Appl. Cryst. 30, 565. CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Galloway, C. P., Doxsee, D. D., Fenske, D., Rauchfuss, T. B., Wilson, S. R. & Yang, X. (1994). Inorg. Chem. 33, 4537–4544. CSD CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Guyon, F., Hameau, A., Khatyr, A., Knorr, M., Amrouche, H., Fortin, D., Harvey, P. D., Strohmann, C., Ndiaye, A. L., Huch, V., Veith, M. & Avarvari, N. (2008). Inorg. Chem. 47, 7483–7492. Web of Science CSD CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Hameau, A., Guyon, F., Knorr, M., Enescu, M. & Strohmann, C. (2006). Monatsh. Chem. 137, 545–555. Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Krug, W. P., Bloch, A. N. & Cowan, D. O. (1977). J. Chem. Soc. Chem. Commun. p. 660. CrossRef Google Scholar
Ndiaye, A. L., Guyon, F., Knorr, M., Huch, V. & Veith, M. (2007). Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 633, 1959–1963. Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Peindy, H. A., Guyon, F., Knorr, M., Smith, A. B., Farouq, J. A., Islas, S. A., Rabinovich, D., Golen, J. A. & Strohmann, C. (2005). Inorg. Chem. Commun. 8, 479–478. Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.
Molecular and polymeric binary carbon sulfides have been the subject of numerous studies (see for example Galloway et al., 1994). In the context of our interest in using sulfur-rich ligands to synthesize coordination polymers (Peindy et al., 2005; Hameau et al., 2006; Ndiaye et al. 2007; Guyon et al. 2008), carbon sulfides and especially 1,3-dithiolo-(4,5-d)-1,3-dithiol-2,5-dithione (α,α-C4S6) appears attractive due to the presence of two potentially coordinating thiocarbonyl sulfur atoms. The α,α-C4S6 carbon sulfide compound, first prepared in 1977 (Krug et al., 1977), reacts with HgI2 to afford the coordination polymer [Hg4I8(C4S6)]n (1). As shown in Fig.1, the monomeric unit has a centrosymmetrical tetranuclear structure which is formed by one α,α-C4S6 ligand linking two Hg2I4 fragments with an inversion centre located at the mid-point of the central C═C bond. Each mercury(II) centre is arranged in a distorted tetrahedral manner. The Hg1 atom is coordinated by one terminal iodine atom (I1), two bridging iodine atoms (I2 and I4iii) and the sulfur of the thiocarbonyl function S2 whereas the coordination sphere of Hg2 involves only bridging iodo ligands (I2, I3, I3ii and I4). Note however that the bridging contribution of I4 is weak since the Hg1iii-I4 distance (3.423 (1) Å) is quite long compared to that of Hg2—I4 (2.6497 (8) Å). The C═S bond of α,α-C4S6 is weakly affected by coordination of the sulfur atom on Hg1 (1.671 (10) Å versus 1.645 (2) in the free ligand, Beck et al., 2006). The Hg1—S2 distance of 2.697 (3) Å is somewhat longer than that reported for 4,5-bis(methylthio)-1,3-dithiole-2-thione on HgI2 (Hameau et al., 2006). The α,α-C4S6 ligands connect the inorganic chains built upon the alternance of 8-membered Hg4I4 and 4-membered Hg2I2 cycles to form a two-dimensional framework. Note that there are no S—S interactions inferior to the sum of the van der Waals radii of two S atoms in the solid state.