organic compounds
2,9-Dichloro-6H,13H-5:12,7:14-dimethanodibenzo[d,i][1,3,6,8]tetraazecine
aDepartamento de Química, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Ciudad Universitaria, Bogotá, Colombia, and bInstitute of Physics ASCR, v.v.i., Na Slovance 2, 182 21 Praha 8, Czech Republic
*Correspondence e-mail: ariverau@unal.edu.co
The title compound, C16H14Cl2N4, is isomorphous with 2,9-dimethyl-6H,13H-5:12,7:14-dimethanodibenzo[d,i]-[1,3,6,8]tetraazecine [Rivera et al. (2009). Acta Cryst. E65, o2553] and has twofold symmetry, with two carbon atoms located on a twofold axis. Only occur between molecules in the crystal. In the isomorphous compound the is stabilized by weak C—H⋯π interactions.
Related literature
For the isomorphous compound see: Rivera et al. (2009). For a related compound, see: Murray-Rust & Smith (1975). For uses of benzo-fused aminal cages, see: Schönherr et al. (2004); Polshettiwar & Varma (2008); Rivera et al. (2008).
Experimental
Crystal data
|
Data collection: CrysAlis PRO (Agilent Technologies, 2010); cell CrysAlis PRO; data reduction: CrysAlis PRO; program(s) used to solve structure: SIR2002 (Burla et al., 2003); program(s) used to refine structure: JANA2006 (Petříček et al., 2006); molecular graphics: DIAMOND(Brandenburg & Putz, 2005); software used to prepare material for publication: JANA2006.
Supporting information
10.1107/S1600536811033721/bx2366sup1.cif
contains datablocks global, I. DOI:Structure factors: contains datablock I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811033721/bx2366Isup2.hkl
Supporting information file. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811033721/bx2366Isup3.cml
A solution of 4-chloro-1,2-diaminobenzene (142 mg, 1 mmol) in MeOH/H2O (5 ml/15 mL) was added dropwise to an aqueous formaldehyde solution (5 ml, 37%) at 273 K. The mixture was allowed to stir for 1 h. at 273 K during which time a white solid was slowly deposited. After completion of the reaction title compound was obtained by filtration of the reaction mixture. The compound isolated was thoroughly washed with water and dried in vacuo. Slow evaporation of an ethyl acetate solution of the title compound yielded crystals suitable for single-crystal X-ray diffraction in 48% yield. Melting point 468 K.
All hydrogen atoms were placed in calculated positions with C–H distance 0.96 Å and refined as riding.The isotropic atomic displacement parameters of hydrogen atoms were evaluated as 1.2×Ueq of the parent atom.
Data collection: CrysAlis PRO (Agilent Technologies, 2010); cell
CrysAlis PRO (Agilent Technologies, 2010); data reduction: CrysAlis PRO (Agilent Technologies, 2010); program(s) used to solve structure: SIR2002 (Burla et al., 2003); program(s) used to refine structure: JANA2006 (Petříček et al., 2006); molecular graphics: DIAMOND (Brandenburg & Putz, 2005); software used to prepare material for publication: JANA2006 (Petříček et al., 2006).Fig. 1. A view of the title compound with the numbering scheme. Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 50% probability level. |
C16H14Cl2N4 | F(000) = 688 |
Mr = 333.2 | Dx = 1.536 Mg m−3 |
Orthorhombic, Aba2 | Cu Kα radiation, λ = 1.5418 Å |
Hall symbol: A 2 -2ac | Cell parameters from 3667 reflections |
a = 9.8633 (6) Å | θ = 4.5–66.8° |
b = 19.0429 (14) Å | µ = 4.06 mm−1 |
c = 7.6720 (7) Å | T = 120 K |
V = 1441.00 (19) Å3 | Plate, colourless |
Z = 4 | 0.48 × 0.29 × 0.06 mm |
Agilent Xcalibur diffractometer with an Atlas (Gemini ultra Cu) detector | 1265 independent reflections |
Radiation source: Enhance Ultra (Cu) X-ray Source | 1174 reflections with I > 3σ(I) |
Mirror monochromator | Rint = 0.044 |
Detector resolution: 10.3784 pixels mm-1 | θmax = 66.8°, θmin = 6.5° |
Rotation method data acquisition using ω scans | h = −11→11 |
Absorption correction: analytical (CrysAlis PRO; Agilent Technologies, 2010); analytical numeric absorption correction using a multifaceted crystal model | k = −22→22 |
Tmin = 0.291, Tmax = 0.78 | l = −9→8 |
7379 measured reflections |
Refinement on F2 | H-atom parameters constrained |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.036 | Weighting scheme based on measured s.u.'s w = 1/(σ2(I) + 0.0016I2) |
wR(F2) = 0.095 | (Δ/σ)max = 0.004 |
S = 1.33 | Δρmax = 0.51 e Å−3 |
1265 reflections | Δρmin = −0.17 e Å−3 |
101 parameters | Absolute structure: (Flack, 1983), 569 Friedel pairs |
0 restraints | Absolute structure parameter: −0.03 (3) |
37 constraints |
C16H14Cl2N4 | V = 1441.00 (19) Å3 |
Mr = 333.2 | Z = 4 |
Orthorhombic, Aba2 | Cu Kα radiation |
a = 9.8633 (6) Å | µ = 4.06 mm−1 |
b = 19.0429 (14) Å | T = 120 K |
c = 7.6720 (7) Å | 0.48 × 0.29 × 0.06 mm |
Agilent Xcalibur diffractometer with an Atlas (Gemini ultra Cu) detector | 1265 independent reflections |
Absorption correction: analytical (CrysAlis PRO; Agilent Technologies, 2010); analytical numeric absorption correction using a multifaceted crystal model | 1174 reflections with I > 3σ(I) |
Tmin = 0.291, Tmax = 0.78 | Rint = 0.044 |
7379 measured reflections |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.036 | H-atom parameters constrained |
wR(F2) = 0.095 | Δρmax = 0.51 e Å−3 |
S = 1.33 | Δρmin = −0.17 e Å−3 |
1265 reflections | Absolute structure: (Flack, 1983), 569 Friedel pairs |
101 parameters | Absolute structure parameter: −0.03 (3) |
0 restraints |
Refinement. The refinement was carried out against all reflections. The conventional R-factor is always based on F. The goodness of fit as well as the weighted R-factor are based on F and F2 for refinement carried out on F and F2, respectively. The threshold expression is used only for calculating R-factors etc. and it is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. The program used for refinement, Jana2006, uses the weighting scheme based on the experimental expectations, see _refine_ls_weighting_details, that does not force S to be one. Therefore the values of S are usually larger than the ones from the SHELX program. |
x | y | z | Uiso*/Ueq | Occ. (<1) | |
Cl1 | 0.91895 (7) | 0.18505 (3) | 0.16603 | 0.0292 (2) | |
N1 | 0.8773 (2) | 0.47904 (11) | 0.4178 (4) | 0.0189 (6) | |
N2 | 1.0725 (2) | 0.44428 (10) | 0.1595 (4) | 0.0195 (6) | |
C1 | 1 | 0.5 | 0.5138 (5) | 0.0183 (11) | |
C2 | 1.1711 (3) | 0.46992 (13) | 0.2877 (4) | 0.0202 (7) | |
C3 | 1 | 0.5 | 0.0621 (5) | 0.0205 (11) | |
C4 | 0.8852 (3) | 0.40867 (13) | 0.3509 (4) | 0.0189 (7) | |
C5 | 0.7937 (3) | 0.35816 (14) | 0.4088 (4) | 0.0225 (7) | |
C6 | 0.8032 (3) | 0.28915 (15) | 0.3488 (4) | 0.0231 (8) | |
C7 | 0.9055 (3) | 0.27247 (14) | 0.2356 (4) | 0.0222 (8) | |
C8 | 0.9965 (3) | 0.32191 (13) | 0.1713 (5) | 0.0215 (7) | |
C9 | 0.9845 (3) | 0.39095 (14) | 0.2278 (4) | 0.0187 (7) | |
H1a | 1.022741 | 0.464287 | 0.59718 | 0.022* | 0.5 |
H1b | 0.977259 | 0.535713 | 0.59718 | 0.022* | 0.5 |
H2a | 1.212108 | 0.430722 | 0.346134 | 0.0243* | |
H2b | 1.248556 | 0.488821 | 0.228165 | 0.0243* | |
H3a | 1.060567 | 0.52114 | −0.020563 | 0.0247* | 0.5 |
H3b | 0.939433 | 0.47886 | −0.020563 | 0.0247* | 0.5 |
H5 | 0.723842 | 0.370826 | 0.490066 | 0.027* | |
H6 | 0.7394 | 0.254156 | 0.386118 | 0.0277* | |
H8 | 1.065893 | 0.308653 | 0.089972 | 0.0258* |
U11 | U22 | U33 | U12 | U13 | U23 | |
Cl1 | 0.0363 (4) | 0.0194 (3) | 0.0318 (4) | −0.0013 (2) | 0.0042 (3) | −0.0043 (3) |
N1 | 0.0200 (11) | 0.0177 (10) | 0.0189 (11) | 0.0005 (9) | 0.0006 (10) | 0.0007 (9) |
N2 | 0.0201 (10) | 0.0184 (10) | 0.0199 (10) | −0.0004 (8) | 0.0012 (10) | −0.0016 (11) |
C1 | 0.0231 (19) | 0.0156 (16) | 0.0163 (19) | 0.0021 (13) | 0 | 0 |
C2 | 0.0174 (12) | 0.0197 (12) | 0.0236 (13) | 0.0025 (10) | 0.0004 (11) | −0.0009 (11) |
C3 | 0.027 (2) | 0.0215 (19) | 0.014 (2) | 0.0001 (14) | 0 | 0 |
C4 | 0.0182 (13) | 0.0213 (13) | 0.0172 (12) | 0.0006 (10) | −0.0040 (11) | 0.0019 (11) |
C5 | 0.0222 (14) | 0.0245 (12) | 0.0207 (13) | −0.0006 (10) | −0.0001 (13) | 0.0012 (11) |
C6 | 0.0217 (13) | 0.0238 (13) | 0.0237 (13) | −0.0031 (10) | −0.0054 (12) | 0.0017 (12) |
C7 | 0.0267 (15) | 0.0169 (12) | 0.0230 (13) | 0.0021 (10) | −0.0073 (11) | −0.0016 (11) |
C8 | 0.0214 (12) | 0.0247 (12) | 0.0186 (13) | 0.0040 (9) | −0.0028 (15) | −0.0016 (12) |
C9 | 0.0165 (12) | 0.0216 (12) | 0.0182 (12) | 0.0004 (10) | −0.0026 (10) | 0.0004 (10) |
N1—C1 | 1.472 (3) | C3—H3b | 0.96 |
N1—C2i | 1.473 (4) | C4—C5 | 1.392 (4) |
N1—C4 | 1.437 (3) | C4—C9 | 1.402 (4) |
N2—C2 | 1.467 (4) | C5—C6 | 1.395 (4) |
N2—C3 | 1.482 (3) | C5—H5 | 0.96 |
N2—C9 | 1.435 (3) | C6—C7 | 1.369 (4) |
C1—H1a | 0.96 | C6—H6 | 0.96 |
C1—H1b | 0.96 | C7—C8 | 1.391 (4) |
C2—H2a | 0.96 | C8—C9 | 1.389 (4) |
C2—H2b | 0.96 | C8—H8 | 0.96 |
C3—H3a | 0.96 | ||
C1—N1—C2i | 115.28 (19) | N2—C3—H3ai | 109.4707 |
C1—N1—C4 | 112.78 (19) | N2i—C3—H3a | 109.4708 |
C2i—N1—C4 | 113.0 (2) | N2i—C3—H3b | 109.4717 |
C2—N2—C3 | 114.81 (18) | H3a—C3—H3b | 97.2479 |
C2—N2—C9 | 113.1 (3) | N1—C4—C5 | 119.7 (3) |
C3—N2—C9 | 113.53 (18) | N1—C4—C9 | 120.2 (2) |
N1—C1—N1i | 119.9 (3) | C5—C4—C9 | 120.1 (2) |
N1—C1—H1a | 109.4716 | C4—C5—C6 | 120.1 (3) |
N1—C1—H1ai | 109.4709 | C4—C5—H5 | 119.9335 |
N1i—C1—H1a | 109.4709 | C6—C5—H5 | 119.9344 |
N1i—C1—H1b | 109.4716 | C5—C6—C7 | 118.5 (3) |
H1a—C1—H1b | 96.4816 | C5—C6—H6 | 120.7546 |
N1i—C2—N2 | 117.3 (2) | C7—C6—H6 | 120.755 |
N1i—C2—H2a | 109.4713 | C6—C7—C8 | 122.9 (3) |
N1i—C2—H2b | 109.4717 | C7—C8—C9 | 118.4 (3) |
N2—C2—H2a | 109.471 | C7—C8—H8 | 120.82 |
N2—C2—H2b | 109.4709 | C9—C8—H8 | 120.8182 |
H2a—C2—H2b | 100.2895 | N2—C9—C4 | 119.9 (2) |
N2—C3—N2i | 119.4 (3) | N2—C9—C8 | 120.3 (3) |
N2—C3—H3a | 109.4717 | C4—C9—C8 | 119.8 (3) |
Symmetry code: (i) −x+2, −y+1, z. |
Experimental details
Crystal data | |
Chemical formula | C16H14Cl2N4 |
Mr | 333.2 |
Crystal system, space group | Orthorhombic, Aba2 |
Temperature (K) | 120 |
a, b, c (Å) | 9.8633 (6), 19.0429 (14), 7.6720 (7) |
V (Å3) | 1441.00 (19) |
Z | 4 |
Radiation type | Cu Kα |
µ (mm−1) | 4.06 |
Crystal size (mm) | 0.48 × 0.29 × 0.06 |
Data collection | |
Diffractometer | Agilent Xcalibur diffractometer with an Atlas (Gemini ultra Cu) detector |
Absorption correction | Analytical (CrysAlis PRO; Agilent Technologies, 2010); analytical numeric absorption correction using a multifaceted crystal model |
Tmin, Tmax | 0.291, 0.78 |
No. of measured, independent and observed [I > 3σ(I)] reflections | 7379, 1265, 1174 |
Rint | 0.044 |
(sin θ/λ)max (Å−1) | 0.596 |
Refinement | |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S | 0.036, 0.095, 1.33 |
No. of reflections | 1265 |
No. of parameters | 101 |
H-atom treatment | H-atom parameters constrained |
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å−3) | 0.51, −0.17 |
Absolute structure | (Flack, 1983), 569 Friedel pairs |
Absolute structure parameter | −0.03 (3) |
Computer programs: CrysAlis PRO (Agilent Technologies, 2010), SIR2002 (Burla et al., 2003), JANA2006 (Petříček et al., 2006), DIAMOND (Brandenburg & Putz, 2005).
Acknowledgements
We acknowledge the Dirección de Investigaciones, Sede Bogotá (DIB) de la Universidad Nacional de Colombia, for financial support of this work, as well as the Institutional Research Plan No. AVOZ10100521 of the Institute of Physics and the Praemium Academiae project of the Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic.
References
Agilent Technologies (2010). CrysAlis PRO. Yarnton, Oxfordshire, England. Google Scholar
Brandenburg, K. & Putz, H. (2005). DIAMOND. Crystal Impact, Bonn, Germany. Google Scholar
Burla, M. C., Camalli, M., Carrozzini, B., Cascarano, G. L., Giacovazzo, C., Polidori, G. & Spagna, R. (2003). J. Appl. Cryst. 36, 1103. CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Flack, H. D. (1983). Acta Cryst. A39, 876–881. CrossRef CAS Web of Science IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Murray-Rust, P. & Smith, I. (1975). Acta Cryst. B31, 587–589. CSD CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Web of Science Google Scholar
Petříček, V., Dušek, M. & Palatinus, L. (2006). JANA2006. Institute of Physics, Prague, Czech Republic. Google Scholar
Polshettiwar, V. & Varma, R. S. (2008). Tetrahedron Lett. 49, 7165–7167. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Rivera, A., Maldonado, M., Ríos-Motta, J., González-Salas, D. & Dacunha-Marinho, B. (2009). Acta Cryst. E65, o2553. Web of Science CSD CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Rivera, A., Navarro, M. & Rios-Motta, J. (2008). Heterocycles, 75, 1651–1658. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Schönherr, T., Weber, E. & Seichter, W. (2004). J. Inclusion Phenom. Macrocycl. Chem. 50, 187–191. Google Scholar
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.
Macrocyclic oligoaza compounds such as title compound (I) have been prepared in a variety of structural modifications and studied widely (Schönherr et al., 2004). With regard to their use in the synthesis of ring-fused aminals which are of considerable interest as useful building block sand as potential drug candidates (Polshettiwar & Varma, 2008) we have used aromatic macrocyclic aminal compounds to perform one-pot synthesis of benzimidazole compounds (Rivera et al., 2008). Engaged in the development of new synthetic pathways of ring-fused aminals, we undertaken the synthesis of the macrocyclic aminal 2,9-dichloro-6H,13H-5:12,7:14-dimethane- dibenzo[d,i][1,3,6,8]tetraazecine (I), by the reaction of 4-chloro-1,2-diaminobenzene with aqueous formaldehyde using a water-MeOH mixture as solvent. The title compound, shown in Fig. 1, is isomorphous with 2,9-dimethyl-6H,13H-5:12,7:14-dimethane- dibenzo[d,i][1,3,6,8]tetraazecine (Rivera et al., 2009) and has twofold symmetry, with the C1 and C3 atoms located on a twofold axis and is The bond lengths and angles of the title compound are within normal ranges and are comparable with the isomorphous compound and with the related compound 6H,13H-5:12,7:14-dimethanedibenzo[d,i][1,3,6,8]tetraazecine (Murray-Rust & Smith, 1975) .However, the C6—C7 bond [1.369 (4) Å] in (I) is slightly shorter than that observed in the isomorphous structure [1.385 (3) Å Rivera et al., 2009], suggesting some effect of halogen substitution. This fact is further supported by the C7—C8 bond length [1.403 (2) Å], which is slightly longer than C6—C7 bond [1.369 (4) Å].The crystal packing is stabilized by van der Waal's force. In the isomorphous compound the crystal structure is stabilized by weak C—H···π interactions.