metal-organic compounds
Ethylenediammonium tetraaquadisulfatocadmate
aLaboratoire de l'État Solide, Département de Chimie, Faculté des Sciences de Sfax, Université de Sfax, BP 1171, 3000 Sfax, Tunisia, and bLaboratoire de Chimie du Solide et Inorganique Moléculaire (CNRS, UMR 6511), Université de Rennes I, Avenue du Général Leclerc, 35042 Rennes Cedex, France
*Correspondence e-mail: w_rekik@alinto.com
The 3(CH2)2NH3][Cd(SO4)2(H2O)4], consists of [Cd(SO4)2(H2O)4]2− anions that are built from octahedral Cd(H2O)4O2 and SO4 tetrahedral units linked by corner sharing. The ethylenediamminium cations are linked to the anions via N—H⋯O hydrogen bonds. The contains one-half of the compound, the other half being related to the first by an inversion centre. The presents alternate stacking of the inorganic and organic layers along the crystallographic b axis. The structure cohesion and stability is further assured by O(water)—H⋯O hydrogen bonds.
of the title compound, [NHRelated literature
For our previous work on the synthesis, characterization and properties of mixed metal sulfates and et al. (2005, 2007, 2008, 2009a); Naïli et al. (2006); Yahyaoui et al. (2007). For the manganese, iron, cobalt and magnesium analogs of the title compound, see: Chaabouni et al. (1996); Held (2003); Rekik et al. (2008, 2009b). For our previous work on the synthesis, characterization and properties of mixed metal sulfates and see: Rekik, Naïli, Bataille & Mhiri (2006); Rekik, Naïli, Bataille, Roisnel & Mhiri (2006).
see: RekikExperimental
Crystal data
|
Refinement
|
|
Data collection: COLLECT (Nonius, 1998); cell SCALEPACK (Otwinowski & Minor, 1997); data reduction: DENZO (Otwinowski & Minor, 1997) and SCALEPACK; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: DIAMOND (Brandenburg & Berndt, 1999); software used to prepare material for publication: WinGX (Farrugia, 1999).
Supporting information
10.1107/S1600536811030005/go2021sup1.cif
contains datablocks global, I. DOI:Structure factors: contains datablock I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811030005/go2021Isup2.hkl
Single-crystals of the title compound were grown by slow evaporation at room temperature of an aqueous solution of CdSO4.8(H2O)/C2H8N2 /H2SO4in a ratio 1:1:1. The product was filtered off and washed with a small amount of distilled water.
The aqua H atoms were located in difference map and refined with O—H distance restraints of 0.85 (2) Å and H—H distance restraints of 1.35 (2) Å. H atoms bonded to C and N atomswere positioned geometrically and allowed to ride on their parent atom, with C—H = 0.97 Å, N—H = 0.89 Å and Uiso = 1.2Ueq(C, N). The 1 1 3 reflection has been omitted, (Iobs/Ical)/sigma greater than 10.
Data collection: COLLECT (Nonius, 1998); cell
SCALEPACK (Otwinowski & Minor, 1997); data reduction: DENZO and SCALEPACK (Otwinowski & Minor, 1997); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: DIAMOND (Brandenburg & Berndt, 1999); software used to prepare material for publication: WinGX (Farrugia, 1999).Fig. 1. Projection of the crystal structure of the title compound along the a axis, with hydrogen bonds indicated as dashed lines. | |
Fig. 2. A part of the crystal structure of the title compound showing the asymmetric unit (expanded by symmetry to give complete organic cation and trimeric unit) and atom numbering. Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 50% probability level. Hydrogen bonds are represented by dashed lines.[Symmetry codes: (I) -x + 1, -y + 1, -z + 2; (II) -x + 2, -y + 2, -z + 1.] |
(C2H10N2)[Cd(SO4)2(H2O)4] | Z = 1 |
Mr = 438.70 | F(000) = 220 |
Triclinic, P1 | Dx = 2.166 Mg m−3 |
Hall symbol: -P 1 | Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å |
a = 6.9114 (2) Å | Cell parameters from 8732 reflections |
b = 7.3056 (2) Å | θ = 2.9–42.2° |
c = 7.3629 (1) Å | µ = 1.99 mm−1 |
α = 74.013 (2)° | T = 293 K |
β = 71.731 (1)° | Prism, colourless |
γ = 78.043 (1)° | 0.12 × 0.11 × 0.07 mm |
V = 336.39 (1) Å3 |
Nonius KappaCCD diffractometer | 4684 independent reflections |
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube | 4352 reflections with I > 2σ(I) |
Horizontally mounted graphite crystal monochromator | Rint = 0.040 |
Detector resolution: 9 pixels mm-1 | θmax = 42.2°, θmin = 2.9° |
CCD rotation images, thick slices scans | h = −13→13 |
Absorption correction: analytical (de Meulenaer & Tompa, 1965) | k = −9→13 |
Tmin = 0.817, Tmax = 0.885 | l = −9→13 |
8732 measured reflections |
Refinement on F2 | Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map |
Least-squares matrix: full | Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.030 | H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement |
wR(F2) = 0.070 | w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0105P)2 + 0.0726P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3 |
S = 1.04 | (Δ/σ)max = 0.001 |
4684 reflections | Δρmax = 0.90 e Å−3 |
105 parameters | Δρmin = −1.49 e Å−3 |
6 restraints | Extinction correction: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008), Fc*=kFc[1+0.001xFc2λ3/sin(2θ)]-1/4 |
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods | Extinction coefficient: 0.242 (7) |
(C2H10N2)[Cd(SO4)2(H2O)4] | γ = 78.043 (1)° |
Mr = 438.70 | V = 336.39 (1) Å3 |
Triclinic, P1 | Z = 1 |
a = 6.9114 (2) Å | Mo Kα radiation |
b = 7.3056 (2) Å | µ = 1.99 mm−1 |
c = 7.3629 (1) Å | T = 293 K |
α = 74.013 (2)° | 0.12 × 0.11 × 0.07 mm |
β = 71.731 (1)° |
Nonius KappaCCD diffractometer | 4684 independent reflections |
Absorption correction: analytical (de Meulenaer & Tompa, 1965) | 4352 reflections with I > 2σ(I) |
Tmin = 0.817, Tmax = 0.885 | Rint = 0.040 |
8732 measured reflections |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.030 | 6 restraints |
wR(F2) = 0.070 | H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement |
S = 1.04 | Δρmax = 0.90 e Å−3 |
4684 reflections | Δρmin = −1.49 e Å−3 |
105 parameters |
Experimental. Data were corrected for Lorentz-polarization effects and an analytical absorption correction (de Meulenaer & Tompa, 1965) was applied. The structure was solved in the P -1 space group by the direct methods (Cd and S) and subsequent difference Fourier syntheses (all other atoms), with an exception for H atoms bonded to C and N atoms which are positioned geometrically. |
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes. |
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger. |
x | y | z | Uiso*/Ueq | ||
Cd | 0.5000 | 0.5000 | 1.0000 | 0.01899 (4) | |
OW1 | 0.5857 (3) | 0.24405 (19) | 1.22634 (18) | 0.0483 (4) | |
OW2 | 0.77475 (16) | 0.43008 (19) | 0.74717 (15) | 0.0293 (2) | |
S | 0.69724 (4) | 0.72895 (4) | 1.24802 (4) | 0.01654 (5) | |
O1 | 0.81539 (17) | 0.55801 (17) | 1.34097 (15) | 0.02945 (19) | |
O2 | 0.49364 (16) | 0.76868 (19) | 1.38281 (14) | 0.0302 (2) | |
O3 | 0.81079 (17) | 0.89591 (15) | 1.18806 (15) | 0.02517 (18) | |
O4 | 0.66952 (18) | 0.69978 (16) | 1.06591 (13) | 0.0285 (2) | |
N | 0.83624 (18) | 0.99858 (18) | 0.75717 (15) | 0.02352 (18) | |
H0A | 0.7789 | 0.9054 | 0.8533 | 0.035* | |
H0B | 0.7386 | 1.0923 | 0.7270 | 0.035* | |
H0C | 0.9219 | 1.0448 | 0.7964 | 0.035* | |
C | 0.9515 (2) | 0.92081 (19) | 0.58209 (17) | 0.0226 (2) | |
H1D | 0.8591 | 0.8685 | 0.5400 | 0.027* | |
H1E | 1.0575 | 0.8180 | 0.6145 | 0.027* | |
H21 | 0.765 (3) | 0.456 (4) | 0.633 (2) | 0.037 (6)* | |
H12 | 0.661 (4) | 0.140 (3) | 1.205 (4) | 0.066 (9)* | |
H11 | 0.561 (4) | 0.235 (4) | 1.347 (2) | 0.045 (7)* | |
H22 | 0.896 (3) | 0.439 (4) | 0.740 (3) | 0.044 (6)* |
U11 | U22 | U33 | U12 | U13 | U23 | |
Cd | 0.02244 (6) | 0.01866 (6) | 0.01811 (6) | −0.00551 (4) | −0.00646 (4) | −0.00462 (4) |
OW1 | 0.0878 (12) | 0.0283 (6) | 0.0277 (5) | 0.0176 (7) | −0.0281 (6) | −0.0090 (4) |
OW2 | 0.0206 (4) | 0.0431 (6) | 0.0245 (4) | −0.0046 (4) | −0.0047 (3) | −0.0096 (4) |
S | 0.01696 (11) | 0.01998 (12) | 0.01439 (10) | −0.00478 (9) | −0.00561 (8) | −0.00337 (8) |
O1 | 0.0256 (5) | 0.0265 (5) | 0.0308 (4) | −0.0015 (4) | −0.0096 (4) | 0.0031 (4) |
O2 | 0.0200 (4) | 0.0437 (6) | 0.0221 (4) | −0.0006 (4) | −0.0016 (3) | −0.0069 (4) |
O3 | 0.0289 (5) | 0.0231 (4) | 0.0292 (4) | −0.0102 (4) | −0.0118 (3) | −0.0056 (3) |
O4 | 0.0410 (6) | 0.0350 (5) | 0.0168 (3) | −0.0214 (5) | −0.0087 (3) | −0.0045 (3) |
N | 0.0244 (5) | 0.0274 (5) | 0.0175 (4) | −0.0054 (4) | −0.0040 (3) | −0.0036 (3) |
C | 0.0275 (5) | 0.0220 (5) | 0.0178 (4) | −0.0080 (4) | −0.0036 (4) | −0.0032 (4) |
Cd—OW1i | 2.2511 (12) | S—O2 | 1.4708 (10) |
Cd—OW1 | 2.2511 (12) | S—O3 | 1.4770 (10) |
Cd—O4 | 2.2789 (9) | S—O4 | 1.4884 (8) |
Cd—O4i | 2.2789 (9) | N—C | 1.4803 (16) |
Cd—OW2i | 2.2887 (10) | N—H0A | 0.8900 |
Cd—OW2 | 2.2887 (10) | N—H0B | 0.8900 |
OW1—H12 | 0.846 (16) | N—H0C | 0.8900 |
OW1—H11 | 0.833 (15) | C—Cii | 1.514 (2) |
OW2—H21 | 0.833 (15) | C—H1D | 0.9700 |
OW2—H22 | 0.842 (15) | C—H1E | 0.9700 |
S—O1 | 1.4669 (11) | ||
OW1i—Cd—OW1 | 180.0 | H21—OW2—H22 | 107.2 (19) |
OW1i—Cd—O4 | 85.76 (5) | O1—S—O2 | 110.44 (7) |
OW1—Cd—O4 | 94.24 (5) | O1—S—O3 | 110.09 (7) |
OW1i—Cd—O4i | 94.24 (5) | O2—S—O3 | 110.47 (7) |
OW1—Cd—O4i | 85.76 (5) | O1—S—O4 | 110.31 (7) |
O4—Cd—O4i | 180.0 | O2—S—O4 | 108.81 (6) |
OW1i—Cd—OW2i | 95.02 (5) | O3—S—O4 | 106.63 (6) |
OW1—Cd—OW2i | 84.98 (5) | S—O4—Cd | 134.68 (6) |
O4—Cd—OW2i | 87.96 (4) | C—N—H0A | 109.5 |
O4i—Cd—OW2i | 92.04 (4) | C—N—H0B | 109.5 |
OW1i—Cd—OW2 | 84.98 (5) | H0A—N—H0B | 109.5 |
OW1—Cd—OW2 | 95.02 (5) | C—N—H0C | 109.5 |
O4—Cd—OW2 | 92.04 (4) | H0A—N—H0C | 109.5 |
O4i—Cd—OW2 | 87.96 (4) | H0B—N—H0C | 109.5 |
OW2i—Cd—OW2 | 180.000 (1) | N—C—Cii | 109.62 (13) |
Cd—OW1—H12 | 127.0 (18) | N—C—H1D | 109.7 |
Cd—OW1—H11 | 127.6 (18) | Cii—C—H1D | 109.7 |
H12—OW1—H11 | 105 (2) | N—C—H1E | 109.7 |
Cd—OW2—H21 | 121.2 (16) | Cii—C—H1E | 109.7 |
Cd—OW2—H22 | 123.0 (15) | H1D—C—H1E | 108.2 |
Symmetry codes: (i) −x+1, −y+1, −z+2; (ii) −x+2, −y+2, −z+1. |
D—H···A | D—H | H···A | D···A | D—H···A |
N—H0A···O4 | 0.89 | 1.93 | 2.8155 (15) | 177 |
N—H0B···O2iii | 0.89 | 1.99 | 2.8378 (16) | 160 |
N—H0C···O3iv | 0.89 | 2.03 | 2.8767 (15) | 160 |
OW1—H11···O2v | 0.83 (2) | 1.90 (2) | 2.7342 (15) | 176 (3) |
OW1—H12···O3vi | 0.85 (2) | 1.89 (2) | 2.7293 (17) | 173 (3) |
OW2—H21···O1vii | 0.83 (2) | 2.01 (2) | 2.8177 (14) | 163 (2) |
OW2—H22···O1viii | 0.84 (2) | 1.89 (2) | 2.7150 (15) | 165 (2) |
Symmetry codes: (iii) −x+1, −y+2, −z+2; (iv) −x+2, −y+2, −z+2; (v) −x+1, −y+1, −z+3; (vi) x, y−1, z; (vii) x, y, z−1; (viii) −x+2, −y+1, −z+2. |
Experimental details
Crystal data | |
Chemical formula | (C2H10N2)[Cd(SO4)2(H2O)4] |
Mr | 438.70 |
Crystal system, space group | Triclinic, P1 |
Temperature (K) | 293 |
a, b, c (Å) | 6.9114 (2), 7.3056 (2), 7.3629 (1) |
α, β, γ (°) | 74.013 (2), 71.731 (1), 78.043 (1) |
V (Å3) | 336.39 (1) |
Z | 1 |
Radiation type | Mo Kα |
µ (mm−1) | 1.99 |
Crystal size (mm) | 0.12 × 0.11 × 0.07 |
Data collection | |
Diffractometer | Nonius KappaCCD diffractometer |
Absorption correction | Analytical (de Meulenaer & Tompa, 1965) |
Tmin, Tmax | 0.817, 0.885 |
No. of measured, independent and observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections | 8732, 4684, 4352 |
Rint | 0.040 |
(sin θ/λ)max (Å−1) | 0.945 |
Refinement | |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S | 0.030, 0.070, 1.04 |
No. of reflections | 4684 |
No. of parameters | 105 |
No. of restraints | 6 |
H-atom treatment | H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement |
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å−3) | 0.90, −1.49 |
Computer programs: COLLECT (Nonius, 1998), DENZO and SCALEPACK (Otwinowski & Minor, 1997), SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008), SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008), DIAMOND (Brandenburg & Berndt, 1999), WinGX (Farrugia, 1999).
Cd—OW1i | 2.2511 (12) | Cd—O4i | 2.2789 (9) |
Cd—OW1 | 2.2511 (12) | Cd—OW2i | 2.2887 (10) |
Cd—O4 | 2.2789 (9) | Cd—OW2 | 2.2887 (10) |
Symmetry code: (i) −x+1, −y+1, −z+2. |
D—H···A | D—H | H···A | D···A | D—H···A |
N—H0A···O4 | 0.89 | 1.93 | 2.8155 (15) | 176.7 |
N—H0B···O2ii | 0.89 | 1.99 | 2.8378 (16) | 159.5 |
N—H0C···O3iii | 0.89 | 2.03 | 2.8767 (15) | 159.5 |
OW1—H11···O2iv | 0.833 (15) | 1.902 (15) | 2.7342 (15) | 176 (3) |
OW1—H12···O3v | 0.846 (16) | 1.887 (17) | 2.7293 (17) | 173 (3) |
OW2—H21···O1vi | 0.833 (15) | 2.012 (17) | 2.8177 (14) | 163 (2) |
OW2—H22···O1vii | 0.842 (15) | 1.894 (17) | 2.7150 (15) | 165 (2) |
Symmetry codes: (ii) −x+1, −y+2, −z+2; (iii) −x+2, −y+2, −z+2; (iv) −x+1, −y+1, −z+3; (v) x, y−1, z; (vi) x, y, z−1; (vii) −x+2, −y+1, −z+2. |
Acknowledgements
Grateful thanks are expressed to Dr T. Roisnel (Centre de Diffractométrie X, Université de Rennes 1) for the X-ray data collection.
References
Brandenburg, K. & Berndt, M. (1999). DIAMOND. Crystal Impact GbR, Bonn, Germany. Google Scholar
Chaabouni, S., Kamoun, S., Daoud, A. & Jouini, T. (1996). Acta Cryst. C52, 505–506. CSD CrossRef CAS Web of Science IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Farrugia, L. J. (1999). J. Appl. Cryst. 32, 837–838. CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Held, P. (2003). Acta Cryst. E59, m197–m198. Web of Science CSD CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Meulenaer, J. de & Tompa, H. (1965). Acta Cryst. 19, 1014–1018. CrossRef IUCr Journals Web of Science Google Scholar
Naïli, H., Rekik, W., Bataille, T. & Mhiri, T. (2006). Polyhedron, 25, 3543–3554. Google Scholar
Nonius (1998). COLLECT. Nonius BV, Delft, The Netherlands. Google Scholar
Otwinowski, Z. & Minor, W. (1997). Methods in Enzymology, Vol. 276, Macromolecular Crystallography, Part A, edited by C. W. Carter Jr & R. M. Sweet, pp. 307–326. New York: Academic Press. Google Scholar
Rekik, W., Naïli, H., Bataille, T. & Mhiri, T. (2006). J. Organomet. Chem. 691, 4725–4732. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Rekik, W., Naïli, H., Bataille, T., Roisnel, T. & Mhiri, T. (2006). Inorg. Chim. Acta, 359, 3954–3962. CAS Google Scholar
Rekik, W., Naïli, H., Mhiri, T. & Bataille, T. (2005). Acta Cryst. E61, m629–m631. Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Rekik, W., Naïli, H., Mhiri, T. & Bataille, T. (2007). J. Chem. Crystallogr. 37, 147–155. Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Rekik, W., Naïli, H., Mhiri, T. & Bataille, T. (2008). Mater. Res. Bull. 43, 2709–2718. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Rekik, W., Naïli, H., Mhiri, T. & Bataille, T. (2009a). Acta Cryst. E65, m1404–m1405. CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Rekik, W., Naïli, H., Mhiri, T. & Bataille, T. (2009b). J. Solid State Sci. 11, 614–621. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Yahyaoui, S., Rekik, W., Naïli, H., Mhiri, T. & Bataille, T. (2007). J. Solid State Chem. 180, 3560–3570. Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.
The chemistry of organic-inorganic hybrid materials has received increasing attention over the last few years, mainly with the idea of using amines as templates and associating transition metals. A great interest has been shown in some organically templated metal sulfate because of their open-framework structure and ferroelastic and ferroelectric propreties. We note also that a previous work of synthesis and characterization of mixed metal sulfates and amines, leading to many important physical properties, has been realized in our laboratory (Rekik et al., 2005; Naïli, et al., 2006; Rekik et al., 2007; Yahyaoui et al., 2007; Rekik et al., 2008; Rekik et al., 2009a). In the course of our investigations on new sulfate materials having interesting properties, we report here the chemical preparation and the structural characterization of a new ethylenediammonium cadmium (II) teraaquadisulfato, [NH3(CH2)2NH3][Cd(SO4)2(H2O)4]. The title compound is isostructural with the manganese, iron, cobalt and magnesium related phases (Chaabouni et al., 1996; Held, 2003; Rekik et al., 2008; Rekik et al., 2009b). As it can be seen in figure 1, the crystal structure shows an alternate stacking of inorganic layers of tetraaquabis(sulfato-O)cadmium anions, [Cd(SO4)2(H2O)4]2-, and organic layers of [NH3(CH2)2NH3]2+ cations along the crystallographic b axis. Anions and cations are linked together through N—H···O hydrogen bonds to form a three-dimensional network. The asymmetric unit (Fig. 2) of the title compound contains only one cadmium atom located at a symmetry centre, only one sulfate tetrahedron and ethylendiammonium cation lying about inversion centre. The Cd(II) central atom is octahedrally coordinated by one oxygen atom of sulfate group, two water molecules and the corresponding centrosymmetrically located atoms. Each octahedron around Cd shares two oxygen atoms with two sulfate groups to form trimeric units. These latest are stabilized and linked via OW—H···O hydrogen bonds giving rise to a three-dimensional inorganic framework delimiting tunnels along the three crystallographic axes. The negative charge of the inorganic part is compensated by ethylediammonium cations which are located on inversion centres in the inorganic framework cavities. The structure cohesion and stability are assured by two types of hydrogen bonds, OW—H···O and N—H···O.