organic compounds
1,4-Dibromobutane-2,3-dione
aCollege of Science, Nanjing Forestry University, No. 159, Longpan Road, Nanjing 210037, People's Republic of China
*Correspondence e-mail: zdxnjfu@gmail.com
The 4H4Br2O2, contains one half-molecule, being located about a centre of inversion. In the crystal, there are no significant intermolecular interactions.
of the title compound, CRelated literature
For the uses of 1,4-dibromobutane-2,3-dione, see: Gogte et al. (1967). For the synthesis of 1,4-dibromobutane-2,3-dione, see: Ruggli & Herzog (1946). For the cystal structure of the 1,4-dichloro analogue, see: Ducourant et al. (1986). For bond–length data, see: Allen et al. (1987).
Experimental
Crystal data
|
Data collection: CAD-4 Software (Enraf–Nonius, 1985); cell CAD-4 Software; data reduction: XCAD4 (Harms & Wocadlo, 1995); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL.
Supporting information
10.1107/S1600536812044200/su2517sup1.cif
contains datablocks I, global, n1. DOI:Structure factors: contains datablock I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812044200/su2517Isup2.hkl
Supporting information file. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812044200/su2517Isup3.cml
1,4-Dibromobutane-2,3-dione was prepared by the method reported in the literature (Ruggli & Herzog, 1946). Yellow plate-like crystals were obtained by dissolving the title compound (0.50 g, 2.05 mmol) in dichloromethane (30 ml) and evaporating the solvent slowly at room temperature for ca. 2 days.
The methylene H atoms were positioned geometrically and refined as riding atoms: C-H = 0.97 Å, with Uiso(H) = 1.2Ueq(C).
Data collection: CAD-4 Software (Enraf–Nonius, 1985); cell
CAD-4 Software (Enraf–Nonius, 1985); data reduction: XCAD4 (Harms & Wocadlo, 1995); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008).C4H4Br2O2 | Dx = 2.442 Mg m−3 |
Mr = 243.89 | Melting point < 395 K |
Orthorhombic, Pbca | Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å |
Hall symbol: -P 2ac 2ab | Cell parameters from 25 reflections |
a = 6.945 (1) Å | θ = 9–14° |
b = 5.542 (1) Å | µ = 12.13 mm−1 |
c = 17.238 (3) Å | T = 298 K |
V = 663.5 (2) Å3 | Cube, yellow |
Z = 4 | 0.10 × 0.10 × 0.10 mm |
F(000) = 456 |
Enraf–Nonius CAD-4 diffractometer | 319 reflections with I > 2σ(I) |
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube | Rint = 0.077 |
Graphite monochromator | θmax = 25.4°, θmin = 2.4° |
ω/2θ scans | h = 0→8 |
Absorption correction: ψ scan (North et al., 1968) | k = −6→6 |
Tmin = 0.195, Tmax = 0.377 | l = −20→20 |
614 measured reflections | 3 standard reflections every 120 min |
614 independent reflections | intensity decay: 1% |
Refinement on F2 | Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods |
Least-squares matrix: full | Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.065 | Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites |
wR(F2) = 0.108 | H-atom parameters constrained |
S = 0.93 | w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.P)2] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3 |
614 reflections | (Δ/σ)max < 0.001 |
37 parameters | Δρmax = 0.65 e Å−3 |
1 restraint | Δρmin = −0.60 e Å−3 |
C4H4Br2O2 | V = 663.5 (2) Å3 |
Mr = 243.89 | Z = 4 |
Orthorhombic, Pbca | Mo Kα radiation |
a = 6.945 (1) Å | µ = 12.13 mm−1 |
b = 5.542 (1) Å | T = 298 K |
c = 17.238 (3) Å | 0.10 × 0.10 × 0.10 mm |
Enraf–Nonius CAD-4 diffractometer | 319 reflections with I > 2σ(I) |
Absorption correction: ψ scan (North et al., 1968) | Rint = 0.077 |
Tmin = 0.195, Tmax = 0.377 | 3 standard reflections every 120 min |
614 measured reflections | intensity decay: 1% |
614 independent reflections |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.065 | 1 restraint |
wR(F2) = 0.108 | H-atom parameters constrained |
S = 0.93 | Δρmax = 0.65 e Å−3 |
614 reflections | Δρmin = −0.60 e Å−3 |
37 parameters |
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes. |
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. |
x | y | z | Uiso*/Ueq | ||
Br | 0.96430 (19) | 0.17863 (19) | 0.67746 (8) | 0.0634 (5) | |
O | 0.8640 (13) | 0.2368 (15) | 0.5056 (4) | 0.062 (2) | |
C1 | 1.0276 (16) | 0.4425 (18) | 0.6134 (6) | 0.055 (3) | |
H1A | 0.9689 | 0.5875 | 0.6342 | 0.066* | |
H1B | 1.1661 | 0.4652 | 0.6138 | 0.066* | |
C2 | 0.9577 (15) | 0.4056 (11) | 0.5267 (6) | 0.039 (2) |
U11 | U22 | U33 | U12 | U13 | U23 | |
Br | 0.0755 (7) | 0.0501 (7) | 0.0647 (9) | −0.0027 (7) | 0.0041 (7) | 0.0097 (6) |
O | 0.076 (5) | 0.036 (3) | 0.073 (6) | −0.026 (5) | −0.019 (5) | 0.007 (3) |
C1 | 0.045 (6) | 0.068 (7) | 0.052 (7) | 0.000 (6) | 0.009 (6) | −0.016 (7) |
C2 | 0.033 (5) | 0.028 (4) | 0.057 (7) | 0.013 (6) | 0.023 (5) | 0.007 (5) |
Br—C1 | 1.885 (10) | C1—H1A | 0.9700 |
O—C2 | 1.196 (11) | C1—H1B | 0.9700 |
C1—C2 | 1.585 (9) | C2—C2i | 1.512 (16) |
C2—C1—Br | 112.4 (6) | H1A—C1—H1B | 107.9 |
C2—C1—H1A | 109.1 | O—C2—C2i | 124.6 (12) |
Br—C1—H1A | 109.1 | O—C2—C1 | 123.7 (8) |
C2—C1—H1B | 109.1 | C2i—C2—C1 | 111.4 (10) |
Br—C1—H1B | 109.1 | ||
Br—C1—C2—O | 4.7 (13) | Br—C1—C2—C2i | −169.0 (8) |
Symmetry code: (i) −x+2, −y+1, −z+1. |
Experimental details
Crystal data | |
Chemical formula | C4H4Br2O2 |
Mr | 243.89 |
Crystal system, space group | Orthorhombic, Pbca |
Temperature (K) | 298 |
a, b, c (Å) | 6.945 (1), 5.542 (1), 17.238 (3) |
V (Å3) | 663.5 (2) |
Z | 4 |
Radiation type | Mo Kα |
µ (mm−1) | 12.13 |
Crystal size (mm) | 0.10 × 0.10 × 0.10 |
Data collection | |
Diffractometer | Enraf–Nonius CAD-4 diffractometer |
Absorption correction | ψ scan (North et al., 1968) |
Tmin, Tmax | 0.195, 0.377 |
No. of measured, independent and observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections | 614, 614, 319 |
Rint | 0.077 |
(sin θ/λ)max (Å−1) | 0.603 |
Refinement | |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S | 0.065, 0.108, 0.93 |
No. of reflections | 614 |
No. of parameters | 37 |
No. of restraints | 1 |
H-atom treatment | H-atom parameters constrained |
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å−3) | 0.65, −0.60 |
Computer programs: CAD-4 Software (Enraf–Nonius, 1985), XCAD4 (Harms & Wocadlo, 1995), SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008), SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008), SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008).
References
Allen, F. H., Kennard, O., Watson, D. G., Brammer, L., Orpen, A. G. & Taylor, R. (1987). J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. 2, pp. S1–19. CrossRef Web of Science Google Scholar
Ducourant, B., Maury, C., Lere-Porte, J.-P., Petrissans, J. & Ribet, J.-L. (1986). Acta Cryst. C42, 341–343. CSD CrossRef CAS Web of Science IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Enraf–Nonius (1985). CAD-4 Software. Enraf–Nonius, Delft, The Netherlands. Google Scholar
Gogte, V. N., Shan, L. G., Tilak, B. D., Gadekar, K. N. & Sahasrabudhe, M. B. (1967). Tetrahedron, 23, 2437–2441. CrossRef CAS PubMed Web of Science Google Scholar
Harms, K. & Wocadlo, S. (1995). XCAD4. University of Marburg, Germany. Google Scholar
North, A. C. T., Phillips, D. C. & Mathews, F. S. (1968). Acta Cryst. A24, 351–359. CrossRef IUCr Journals Web of Science Google Scholar
Ruggli, P. & Herzog, M. (1946). Helv. Chim. Acta., 29, 95-101. CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.
1,4-Dibromobutane-2,3-dione and its derivatives are important intermediates for the synthesis of compounds possessing promising anticancer activity, which is attributed to their likely interference in the hexose-monophosphate (HMP) pathway (Gogte et al., 1967). We report herein on the crystal structure of the title compound.
In the title molecule, Fig. 1, the bond lengths (Allen et al., 1987) and angles are within normal ranges. The asymmetric unit contains one half-molecule, being located on a centre of inversion. It can be compared to the 1,4-dichloro derivative that crystallized in the monoclinic space group P21/c (Ducourant et al., 1986) but which also possesses inversion symmetry.
In the crystal, there are no significant intermolecular interactions (Fig. 2).