research communications
of hydrazine iron(III) phosphate, the first transition metal phosphate containing hydrazine
aLaboratoire de Réactivité et Chimie des Solides (LRCS), Université de Picardie Jules Verne, CNRS UMR 7314, 33 rue Saint Leu, 80039 Amiens, France
*Correspondence e-mail: renald.david@u-picardie.fr
The title compound, poly[(μ2-hydrazine)(μ4-phosphato)iron(III)], [Fe(PO4)(N2H4)]n, was prepared under hydrothermal conditions. Its contains one FeIII atom located on an inversion centre, one P atom located on a twofold rotation axis, and two O, one N and two H atoms located on general positions. The FeIII atom is bound to four O atoms of symmetry-related PO4 tetrahedra and to two N atoms of two symmetry-related hydrazine ligands, resulting in a slightly distorted FeO4N2 octahedron. The consists of a three-dimensional hydrazine/iron phoshate framework whereby each PO4 tetrahedron bridges four FeIII atoms and each hydrazine ligand bridges two FeIII atoms. The H atoms of the hydrazine ligands are also involved in moderate N—H⋯O hydrogen bonding with phosphate O atoms. The is isotypic with the sulfates [Co(SO4)(N2H4)] and [Mn(SO4)(N2H4)].
Keywords: crystal structure; hydrazine; iron phosphate; isotypism.
CCDC reference: 1432700
1. Chemical context
During the last century, transition metal phosphates have been studied intensively not only for their rich crystal- and magneto-chemistry (Kabbour et al., 2012), but also for their various potential applications. For example, NH4MIIPO4·H2O phases, where M is a transition metal, are used as pigments for protective paint finishes on metals, as fire retardants in paints and plastics but may also be applied as catalysts, fertilizers and magnetic devices (Erskine et al., 1944; Bridger et al., 1962; Barros et al., 2006; Ramajo et al., 2009). More recently, it was demonstrated by Goodenough and co-workers that in electrodes the presence of PO4 groups results in higher positive potentials (Padhi et al., 1997), leading to an intensive research on LiFePO4, one of the most promising materials for the new generation of Li batteries (Ouvrard et al., 2013).
2. Structural commentary
The structure of the title compound, [Fe(PO4)(N2H4)], is isotypic with the sulfates [Co(SO4)(N2H4)] and [Mn(SO4)(N2H4)] (Jia et al., 2011). The FeIII atom is bound to four PO4 tetrahedra and to two N atoms of hydrazine ligands, resulting in a slightly distorted FeO4N2 octahedron (Fig. 1). The consists of a three-dimensional network made up of FeIII atoms which are interconnected through neutral hydrazine (N2H4) ligands and phosphate (PO43−) anions (Fig. 2). If the phosphate and sulfate structures are isotypic, the presence of phosphate implies an of +III for the transition metal compared to +II for the sulfate analogues. The replacement of sulfate for phosphate leads to a change in the coordination sphere of the metal. These differences are mainly associated with the metal–oxygen bond lengths. The average FeIII—O bond length is 1.97 Å for [Fe(PO4)(N2H4)] and the average CoII—O bond length is 2.12 Å for [Co(SO4)(N2H4)], whereas the average M—N bond lengths involving the N atom of the hydrazine ligand are similar, with values of 2.17 and 2.12 Å, respectively. As a consequence, the FeN2O4 octahedron is more distorted, appearing like an FeO4 square additionally bound by two trans hydrazine ligands in axial positions.
It should be noted that it seems rather surprising to stabilize FeIII with hydrazine, since the latter is a powerful reducing agent. Efforts are currently underway to obtain the title compound as a pure phase to perform magnetic measurements. It could be a way, by comparison with the results reported for [Co(SO4)(N2H4)] (Jia et al., 2011), to study the ability of hydrazine to transmit magnetic coupling.
3. Supramolecular features
The three-dimensional framework structure of [Fe(PO4)(N2H4)] is consolidated by N—H⋯O interactions between the hydrazine ligands and phosphate O atoms (Fig. 3). One of the two hydrogen bonds is bifurcated. Considering the N⋯O distances and the values of the N—H⋯angles (Table 1), this type of hydrogen bonding can be considered as moderately strong.
4. Synthesis and crystallization
Iron(II) chloride tetrahydrate (>99.0%, Sigma–Aldrich), hydrazine monohydrate (99+%) and KH2PO4 (both VWR International) were used as received without further purification. Iron(II) chloride tetrahydrate (2 g) was dissolved in water (20 ml) before adding hydrazine monohydrate (2 ml). The obtained solution was stirred for 5 min. Then, KH2PO4 (11.5 g) was added. After 10 min of stirring for homogenization, the obtained solution (15 ml) was incorporated in a 23 ml autoclave. The autoclave was then heated at 433 K for 10 h before being cooled to room temperature at a rate of 10 K h−1. The obtained mixture, consiting of orange crystals of the title phase and yellow crystals of an additional phase, was washed with water. The obtained crystals were very small (around 20 µm) and well isolated from the others. Details of the composition and structure of the yellow crystals will be described in a forthcoming article.
5. details
Crystal data, data collection and structure refinements are summarized in Table 2. All H atoms were located in a difference Fourier map and were refined freely with isotropic displacement parameters.
Supporting information
CCDC reference: 1432700
https://doi.org/10.1107/S2056989015020010/wm5227sup1.cif
contains datablocks global, I. DOI:Structure factors: contains datablock I. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1107/S2056989015020010/wm5227Isup2.hkl
Data collection: APEX2 (Bruker, 2013); cell
SAINT (Bruker, 2013); data reduction: SAINT (Bruker, 2013); program(s) used to solve structure: SUPERFLIP (Palatinus & Chapuis, 2007); program(s) used to refine structure: JANA2006 (Petrićek et al., 2014); molecular graphics: DIAMOND (Brandenburg & Putz, 2010); software used to prepare material for publication: JANA2006 (Petrićek et al., 2014).[Fe(PO4)(N2H4)] | F(000) = 364 |
Mr = 182.87 | Dx = 2.902 Mg m−3 |
Orthorhombic, Pccn | Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å |
Hall symbol: -P 2ab 2ac | Cell parameters from 2128 reflections |
a = 6.3114 (13) Å | θ = 4.2–26.9° |
b = 7.6680 (15) Å | µ = 3.89 mm−1 |
c = 8.6485 (18) Å | T = 293 K |
V = 418.55 (15) Å3 | Parallelepiped, orange |
Z = 4 | 0.05 × 0.03 × 0.03 mm |
Bruker APEXII CCD diffractometer | 457 reflections with I > 3σ(I) |
Radiation source: X-ray tube | Rint = 0.065 |
phi scan | θmax = 30.6°, θmin = 4.2° |
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2013) | h = −9→8 |
Tmin = 0.668, Tmax = 0.746 | k = −10→10 |
13820 measured reflections | l = −12→12 |
601 independent reflections |
Refinement on F | 0 constraints |
R[F > 3σ(F)] = 0.020 | All H-atom parameters refined |
wR(F) = 0.027 | Weighting scheme based on measured s.u.'s w = 1/(σ2(F) + 0.0001F2) |
S = 1.46 | (Δ/σ)max = 0.006 |
601 reflections | Δρmax = 0.40 e Å−3 |
47 parameters | Δρmin = −0.33 e Å−3 |
0 restraints |
x | y | z | Uiso*/Ueq | ||
O1 | −0.0604 (2) | 0.30096 (17) | 0.36016 (16) | 0.0093 (4) | |
Fe | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00652 (11) | |
P | −0.25 | 0.25 | 0.25868 (8) | 0.00567 (17) | |
O2 | −0.1898 (2) | 0.09269 (19) | 0.15978 (16) | 0.0111 (4) | |
N | 0.2656 (3) | 0.1556 (2) | 0.0781 (2) | 0.0103 (5) | |
H1 | 0.306 (4) | 0.132 (3) | 0.169 (3) | 0.024 (7)* | |
H2 | 0.364 (4) | 0.139 (3) | 0.012 (3) | 0.020 (7)* |
U11 | U22 | U33 | U12 | U13 | U23 | |
O1 | 0.0089 (6) | 0.0090 (7) | 0.0099 (7) | 0.0001 (5) | −0.0032 (5) | −0.0013 (5) |
Fe | 0.00692 (19) | 0.0059 (2) | 0.00678 (19) | −0.00013 (13) | 0.00010 (16) | −0.00054 (16) |
P | 0.0059 (3) | 0.0053 (3) | 0.0057 (3) | −0.0001 (3) | 0 | 0 |
O2 | 0.0135 (6) | 0.0096 (7) | 0.0101 (7) | 0.0003 (5) | 0.0030 (6) | −0.0033 (6) |
N | 0.0110 (8) | 0.0074 (8) | 0.0123 (9) | −0.0017 (7) | −0.0012 (8) | 0.0010 (7) |
O1—Fei | 1.9843 (14) | P—O2iii | 1.5268 (15) |
O1—P | 1.5346 (15) | N—Niv | 1.461 (2) |
Fe—O2 | 1.9621 (15) | N—H1 | 0.85 (3) |
Fe—O2ii | 1.9621 (15) | N—H2 | 0.85 (3) |
P—O2 | 1.5268 (15) | ||
Fei—O1—P | 133.97 (8) | O1—P—O2iii | 108.25 (7) |
O1v—Fe—O1vi | 180.0 (5) | O1iii—P—O2 | 108.25 (7) |
O1v—Fe—O2 | 88.09 (6) | O1iii—P—O2iii | 109.13 (7) |
O1v—Fe—O2ii | 91.91 (6) | O2—P—O2iii | 111.85 (9) |
O1vi—Fe—O2 | 91.91 (6) | Fe—O2—P | 146.37 (9) |
O1vi—Fe—O2ii | 88.09 (6) | Niv—N—H1 | 104.6 (18) |
O2—Fe—O2ii | 180.0 (5) | Niv—N—H2 | 104.2 (18) |
O1—P—O1iii | 110.23 (8) | H1—N—H2 | 112 (2) |
O1—P—O2 | 109.13 (7) |
Symmetry codes: (i) −x, y+1/2, −z+1/2; (ii) −x, −y, −z; (iii) −x−1/2, −y+1/2, z; (iv) −x+1/2, −y+1/2, z; (v) −x, y−1/2, −z+1/2; (vi) x, −y+1/2, z−1/2. |
D—H···A | D—H | H···A | D···A | D—H···A |
N—H1···O1iv | 0.85 (3) | 2.36 (2) | 3.086 (2) | 144 (2) |
N—H1···O2vii | 0.85 (3) | 2.27 (3) | 2.974 (2) | 141 (2) |
N—H2···O1viii | 0.85 (3) | 2.19 (3) | 2.873 (2) | 137 (2) |
Symmetry codes: (iv) −x+1/2, −y+1/2, z; (vii) x+1/2, −y, −z+1/2; (viii) −x+1/2, y, z−1/2. |
Acknowledgements
The RS2E (French Network on Electrochemical Energy Storage) and ANR (Labex STORE-EX; grant No. ANR-10-LABX-0076) are acknowledged for funding of the X-ray diffractometer.
References
Barros, N., Airoldi, C., Simoni, J. A., Ramajo, B., Espina, A. & García, J. R. (2006). Thermochim. Acta, 441, 89–95. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Brandenburg, K. & Putz, H. (2010). DIAMOND. Crystal Impact GbR, Bonn, Germany. Google Scholar
Bridger, G. L., Salutsky, M. L. & Starostka, R. W. (1962). J. Agric. Food Chem. 10, 181–188. CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Bruker (2013). APEX2, SAINT and SADABS. Bruker–Nonius AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA. Google Scholar
Erskine, A. M., Grimm, G. & Horning, S. C. (1944). Ind. Eng. Chem. 36, 456–460. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Jia, L.-H., Li, R.-Y., Duan, Z.-M., Jiang, S.-D., Wang, B.-W., Wang, Z.-M. & Gao, S. (2011). Inorg. Chem. 50, 144–154. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Kabbour, H., David, R., Pautrat, A., Koo, H.-J., Whangbo, M.-H., André, G. & Mentré, O. (2012). Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 51, 11745–11749. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Ouvrard, G., Zerrouki, M., Soudan, P., Lestriez, B., Masquelier, C., Morcrette, M., Hamelet, S., Belin, S., Flank, A. M. & Baudelet, F. (2013). J. Power Sources, 229, 16–21. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Padhi, A. K., Nanjundaswamy, K. S., Masquelier, C., Okada, S. & Goodenough, J. B. (1997). J. Electrochem. Soc. 144, 1609–1613. CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Palatinus, L. & Chapuis, G. (2007). J. Appl. Cryst. 40, 786–790. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Petříček, V., Dušek, M. & Palatinus, L. (2014). Z. Kristallogr. 229, 345–352. Google Scholar
Ramajo, B., Espina, A., Barros, N. & García, J. R. (2009). Thermochim. Acta, 487, 60–64. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.